1
|
Brodsky AL, Flores Legarreta A, Fellman BM, Glassman D, How J, Vuttaradhi V, Sood AK, Ramondetta LM, Gershenson D, Hillman RT. TERT promoter mutations and survival outcomes in adult-type granulosa cell tumors. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2024:ijgc-2024-005837. [PMID: 39395821 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2024-005837] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES T0 evaluate survival outcomes among patients with adult-type granulosa cell tumors who have telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) promoter mutations. METHODS This is a retrospective cohort study using the MD Anderson Rare Gynecologic Malignancy Registry. Patients with adult granulosa cell tumors who underwent molecular testing for TERT promoter and FOXL2 c.C402G mutations were included. We used descriptive statistics to compare demographic and clinical variables and estimated progression-free and overall survival with Kaplan-Meier curves. Cox proportional hazards regression and log-rank tests were employed for comparisons, with multivariable analyses adjusting for various factors. RESULTS Among 70 patients, 28 (40%) had TERT+ tumors. The median age at diagnosis was 40 years (range 12-71) for TERT- patients and 46 years (range 25-76) for TERT+ patients. At diagnosis, 22 (63%) of 35 TERT- patients were stage I, 10 (29%) stage II, and 3 (9%) stage III, while in the TERT+ group, 17/23 (74%) were stage I, 3 (13%) stage II, and 3 (13%) stage II. Univariable analysis showed no difference in time from diagnosis to first recurrence (p=0.19) and from first recurrence to second recurrence (p=0.24) based on tumor TERT status. The median time from first to second recurrence in the TERT- group was 27.3 months (95% CI 14.1 to 40.0) and in the TERT+ group was 14.8 months (95% CI 8.1 to 21.0). There was no observed difference in overall survival between the groups (HR=0.53; 95% CI 0.19 to 1.45; p=0.21). Multivariable analysis adjusting for age at diagnosis, TERT promoter mutation status, systemic chemotherapy, and stage demonstrated a significant difference in progression-free survival based on TERT mutation status (HR=2.89; 95% CI 1.32 to 6.36). CONCLUSIONS After adjustment for covariates, patients with adult granulosa cell tumors and TERT+ tumors had shorter progression-free survival after first recurrence. TERT promoter mutations may identify a subset of patients with recurrent adult granulosa cell tumors and less favorable outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison L Brodsky
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Alejandra Flores Legarreta
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Bryan M Fellman
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Deanna Glassman
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jeffrey How
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Veena Vuttaradhi
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Anil K Sood
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Lois Michelle Ramondetta
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - David Gershenson
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Robert Tyler Hillman
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Andres S, Finch L, Iasonos A, Zhou Q, Girshman J, Chhetri-Long R, Green H, Jang D, O'Cearbhaill R, Kyi C, Cohen S, Friedman C, Makker V, Chi DS, Sonoda Y, Chiang S, Aghajanian C, Weigelt B, Grisham RN. Basket study of oral progesterone antagonist onapristone extended release in progesterone receptor-positive recurrent granulosa cell, low-grade serous ovarian cancer, or endometrioid endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2024; 189:30-36. [PMID: 38991472 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.06.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2024] [Revised: 06/24/2024] [Accepted: 06/27/2024] [Indexed: 07/13/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the safety and efficacy of the oral progesterone antagonist onapristone extended release (onapristone-XR) in patients with recurrent progesterone receptor (PR)-positive adult-type granulosa cell tumor (aGCT), low-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSOC), or endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC). METHODS This single-institution phase II study included patients with PR-positive aGCT, LGSOC, or EEC who received ≥1 prior line of chemotherapy. Patients were enrolled from 5/2019-5/2020. PR status was evaluated via immunohistochemistry. Eligible patients had PR expression ≥1% on tissue collected within 3 years of enrollment. Patients received 50 mg of onapristone-XR twice daily until disease progression or treatment discontinuation. Adverse events were graded by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1. Secondary endpoints were response duration, clinical benefit rate (CBR), and safety. RESULTS Five patients with LGSOC and 1 with EEC enrolled, but both cohorts closed early due to slow accrual. Fourteen patients with aGCT enrolled and completed stage 1 accrual. No responses were observed. Four patients with LGSOC were evaluable, with median PFS of 4.4 months (range, 1.8-NE) and CBR of 50% (range, 6.8%-93.2%). All 14 patients with aGCT were evaluable, with median PFS of 2.8 months (range, 1.6-4.9), 6-month PFS rate of 21.4% (range, 5.2%-44.8%), 12-month PFS rate of 14.3% (range, 2.3%-36.6%), and a CBR of 35.7% (range, 12.8%-64.9%). CONCLUSIONS The study did not meet its primary endpoint. While onapristone-XR was well tolerated in all 3 arms, no objective responses were observed.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Humans
- Female
- Middle Aged
- Aged
- Receptors, Progesterone/metabolism
- Endometrial Neoplasms/drug therapy
- Endometrial Neoplasms/pathology
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy
- Carcinoma, Endometrioid/drug therapy
- Carcinoma, Endometrioid/pathology
- Carcinoma, Endometrioid/metabolism
- Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy
- Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology
- Ovarian Neoplasms/metabolism
- Granulosa Cell Tumor/drug therapy
- Granulosa Cell Tumor/metabolism
- Granulosa Cell Tumor/pathology
- Adult
- Gonanes/administration & dosage
- Gonanes/adverse effects
- Delayed-Action Preparations/administration & dosage
- Aged, 80 and over
- Administration, Oral
- Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous/drug therapy
- Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous/pathology
- Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous/metabolism
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Andres
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lindsey Finch
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alexia Iasonos
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Qin Zhou
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jeffrey Girshman
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rashmi Chhetri-Long
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hunter Green
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dasom Jang
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Roisin O'Cearbhaill
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Chrisann Kyi
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Seth Cohen
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Claire Friedman
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Vicky Makker
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dennis S Chi
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yukio Sonoda
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sarah Chiang
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Carol Aghajanian
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Britta Weigelt
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rachel N Grisham
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Moh M, Puzyrenko A, Summey R, Rader JS, Herrera Cano GE, Gavina JV, Rui H, Sun Y, Hopp E. Clinicopathologic Characteristics of a Single-institution Cohort of Ovarian Adult Granulosa Cell Tumors, With Biomarker and Therapeutic Implications Utilizing the Detection of Androgen, Estrogen, and Progesterone Hormone Receptor Expression by Immunohistochemistry. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2024; 43:527-534. [PMID: 38661526 DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0000000000001032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
Adult granulosa cell tumors (AGCTs) are rare ovarian tumors with generally good prognosis after surgical resection; however, they do have recurrence potential. Therapeutic and management options for recurrences are currently limited, and the need for expanded adjuvant therapies is increasingly recognized. Anti-hormonal therapy is being explored as an option, which relies on the detection and assessment of hormone receptor expression (androgen, estrogen, and progesterone receptors) as a biomarker and therapeutic target. Our study identifies several clinicopathologic characteristics with significant associations for recurrence of AGCT, which were younger age, higher stage, and larger tumor size. Our study also demonstrates that androgen receptor (AR) expression may be utilized as a potential biomarker for hormonal therapy and that detection of AR expression in AGCT by immunohistochemistry (IHC) varies depending on the antibody clone used for testing. AR was detected in 95% of samples tested with antibodies derived from clone AR27. This detection rate is much higher than previously reported.
Collapse
|
4
|
Moss E, Taylor A, Andreou A, Ang C, Arora R, Attygalle A, Banerjee S, Bowen R, Buckley L, Burbos N, Coleridge S, Edmondson R, El-Bahrawy M, Fotopoulou C, Frost J, Ganesan R, George A, Hanna L, Kaur B, Manchanda R, Maxwell H, Michael A, Miles T, Newton C, Nicum S, Ratnavelu N, Ryan N, Sundar S, Vroobel K, Walther A, Wong J, Morrison J. British Gynaecological Cancer Society (BGCS) ovarian, tubal and primary peritoneal cancer guidelines: Recommendations for practice update 2024. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2024; 300:69-123. [PMID: 39002401 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.06.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2024] [Accepted: 06/13/2024] [Indexed: 07/15/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Esther Moss
- College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK
| | | | - Adrian Andreou
- Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Combe Park, Bath BA1 3NG, UK
| | - Christine Ang
- Northern Gynaecological Oncology Centre, Gateshead, UK
| | - Rupali Arora
- Department of Cellular Pathology, University College London NHS Trust, 60 Whitfield Street, London W1T 4E, UK
| | | | | | - Rebecca Bowen
- Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Combe Park, Bath BA1 3NG, UK
| | - Lynn Buckley
- Beverley Counselling & Psychotherapy, 114 Holme Church Lane, Beverley, East Yorkshire HU17 0PY, UK
| | - Nikos Burbos
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital Colney Lane, Norwich NR4 7UY, UK
| | | | - Richard Edmondson
- Saint Mary's Hospital, Manchester and University of Manchester, M13 9WL, UK
| | - Mona El-Bahrawy
- Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London W12 0HS, UK
| | | | - Jonathan Frost
- Gynaecological Oncology, Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Combe Park, Bath, Bath BA1 3NG, UK; University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Raji Ganesan
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Birmingham Women's Hospital, Birmingham B15 2TG, UK
| | | | - Louise Hanna
- Department of Oncology, Velindre Cancer Centre, Whitchurch, Cardiff CF14 2TL, UK
| | - Baljeet Kaur
- North West London Pathology (NWLP), Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London W12 0HS, UK
| | - Ranjit Manchanda
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Cancer Research UK Barts Centre, Queen Mary University of London and Barts Health NHS Trust, UK
| | - Hillary Maxwell
- Dorset County Hospital, Williams Avenue, Dorchester, Dorset DT1 2JY, UK
| | - Agnieszka Michael
- Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford GU2 7XX and University of Surrey, School of Biosciences, GU2 7WG, UK
| | - Tracey Miles
- Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Combe Park, Bath BA1 3NG, UK
| | - Claire Newton
- Gynaecology Oncology Department, St Michael's Hospital, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol BS1 3NU, UK
| | - Shibani Nicum
- Department of Oncology, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK
| | | | - Neil Ryan
- The Centre for Reproductive Health, Institute for Regeneration and Repair (IRR), 4-5 Little France Drive, Edinburgh BioQuarter City, Edinburgh EH16 4UU, UK
| | - Sudha Sundar
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham and Pan Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre, City Hospital, Birmingham B18 7QH, UK
| | - Katherine Vroobel
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Royal Marsden Foundation NHS Trust, London SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Axel Walther
- Bristol Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Jason Wong
- Department of Histopathology, East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust, Ipswich Hospital, Heath Road, Ipswich IP4 5PD, UK
| | - Jo Morrison
- University of Exeter, Exeter, UK; Department of Gynaecological Oncology, GRACE Centre, Musgrove Park Hospital, Somerset NHS Foundation Trust, Taunton TA1 5DA, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Trozzi R, Tuyaerts S, Annibali D, Herreros Pomares A, Boog L, Van Dam P, Leunen K, Deroose C, Trum H, Amant F. An open-label, single-arm, prospective, multi-center, tandem two-stage designed phase II study to evaluate the efficacy of fulvestrant in women with recurrent/metastatic estrogen receptor-positive gynecological malignancies (FUCHSia study). Int J Gynecol Cancer 2024; 34:1217-1224. [PMID: 38724237 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2023-005229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/07/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate fulvestrant efficacy in women with estrogen receptor-positive low-grade gynecological cancers. The primary objective was to determine the response rate. Secondary objectives were progression-free survival, clinical benefit, duration of response, safety, tolerability, and quality of life. METHODS FUCHSia is an open-label, single-arm, prospective, multi-center phase II study. The study population included patients with recurrent/metastatic low-grade gynecological malignancies with estrogen receptor positivity who received a maximum of two lines of previous hormonal therapy. Patients received fulvestrant (FASLODEX, AstraZeneca) via two intramuscular injections (250 mg/5 mL each) in the gluteal muscle on day 1, day 15, day 29, and then every 28 days thereafter until disease progression, withdrawal from the trial due to any unacceptable adverse event, or withdrawal of patient consent. RESULTS A total of 15 patients (uterine sarcoma n=4; sex cord-stromal ovarian tumors n=3; endometrial carcinoma n=4; serous ovarian cancer n=4) were enrolled. Median follow-up was 48 weeks (interquartile range (IQR) 26-122) in the uterine sarcoma cohort, 63 weeks (IQR 28-77) for sex cord-stromal tumors, 19 weeks (IQR 17-21) for endometrial carcinoma, and 60 weeks (IQR 40-119) for serous ovarian cancer. One partial response according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1 was observed in one uterine sarcoma patient. No responses were observed in the other cohorts. However, stable disease was observed in three uterine sarcomas (median duration 12 weeks), three sex cord-stromal tumors (median duration 32 weeks), and four low-grade serous ovarian cancer patients (median duration 20 weeks), leading to a disease control rate of 100% for these tumor types. All patients with endometrial carcinoma showed progressive disease. CONCLUSION Fulvestrant may control tumor growth in recurrent/metastatic estrogen receptor-positive low-grade gynecological malignancies of specific histology. Further studies are needed to confirm these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rita Trozzi
- Department of Women, children and Public health sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Sandra Tuyaerts
- Laboratory of Medical and Molecular Oncology (LMMO), Department of Medical Oncology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, UZ Brussel, Brussel, Belgium
| | - Daniela Annibali
- Laboratory of Gynecological Oncology, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Netherlands Cancer Institute Department of Gynecology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Lotte Boog
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Netherlands Cancer Institute Department of Gynecology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Peter Van Dam
- Division Gynaecological Oncology, Multidisciplinary oncologic Centre, CORE Antwerp University, Edegem, Belgium
| | - Karin Leunen
- Gynecology and Obstetrics, AZ Sint-Maarten, Mechelen, Antwerpen, Belgium
| | - Christophe Deroose
- Nuclear Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant, Belgium
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium
| | - Hans Trum
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Netherlands Cancer Institute Department of Gynecology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frédéric Amant
- Laboratory of Gynecological Oncology, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Netherlands Cancer Institute Department of Gynecology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sajeev A, BharathwajChetty B, Manickasamy MK, Alqahtani MS, Abbas M, Shakibaei M, Sethi G, Ma Z, Kunnumakkara AB. Nuclear receptors in ovarian cancer: changing paradigms in cancer therapeutics. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1383939. [PMID: 39077471 PMCID: PMC11284039 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1383939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2024] [Accepted: 05/31/2024] [Indexed: 07/31/2024] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cancer (OVC) is one of the most common causes of cancer-related deaths in women worldwide. Despite advancements in detection and therapy, the prognosis of OVC remains poor due to late diagnosis and the lack of effective therapeutic options at advanced stages. Therefore, a better understanding of the biology underlying OVC is essential for the development of effective strategies for early detection and targeted therapies. Nuclear receptors (NRs) are a superfamily of 48 transcription factors that, upon binding to their specific ligand, play a vital role in regulating various cellular processes such as growth, development, metabolism, and homeostasis. Accumulating evidence from several studies has shown that their aberrant expression is associated with multiple human diseases. Numerous NRs have shown significant effects in the development of various cancers, including OVC. This review summarizes the recent findings on the role of NRs in OVC, as well as their potential as prognostic and therapeutic markers. Further, the basic structure and signaling mechanism of NRs have also been discussed briefly. Moreover, this review highlights their cellular and molecular mechanisms in chemoresistance and chemosensitization. Further, the clinical trials targeting NRs for the treatment of OVC have also been discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anjana Sajeev
- Cancer Biology Laboratory, Department of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati (IITG), Guwahati, Assam, India
| | - Bandari BharathwajChetty
- Cancer Biology Laboratory, Department of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati (IITG), Guwahati, Assam, India
| | - Mukesh Kumar Manickasamy
- Cancer Biology Laboratory, Department of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati (IITG), Guwahati, Assam, India
| | - Mohammed S. Alqahtani
- Radiological Sciences Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia
- BioImaging Unit, Space Research Centre, Michael Atiyah Building, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - Mohamed Abbas
- Electrical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mehdi Shakibaei
- Chair of Vegetative Anatomy, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Gautam Sethi
- Department of Pharmacology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- National University of Singapore (NUS) Center for Cancer Research, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Zhaowu Ma
- School of Basic Medicine, Health Science Center, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, Hubei, China
| | - Ajaikumar B. Kunnumakkara
- Cancer Biology Laboratory, Department of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati (IITG), Guwahati, Assam, India
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ottenbourgs T, van Gorp T, Kridelka F, Baert T, Denys H, Selle F, Baas I, Van Rompuy AS, Lambrechts D, Van Nieuwenhuysen E. A phase II, multicenter, open-label study of abemaciclib and letrozole in patients with estrogen receptor-positive rare ovarian cancer: ALEPRO trial. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2024; 34:627-630. [PMID: 38453176 PMCID: PMC10982620 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2023-005189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low-grade serous and endometrioid ovarian cancers and adult-type granulosa cell tumors are rare ovarian malignancies that show high estrogen receptor positivity. Recurrences of these subtypes of ovarian cancer are often treated with conventional chemotherapy, although response rates are disappointing. PRIMARY OBJECTIVE To determine the overall response rate of the combination therapy of abemaciclib and letrozole in patients with estrogen receptor-positive rare ovarian cancers. STUDY HYPOTHESIS The combination therapy of abemaciclib and letrozole will provide a clinically meaningful therapeutic benefit, with an overall response rate of >25%. TRIAL DESIGN This is a phase II, international, multicenter, open-label, single-arm study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of abemaciclib and letrozole in patients with advanced, recurrent, and/or metastatic estrogen receptor-positive, rare ovarian cancer. The study will follow a tandem two-stage design. MAJOR INCLUSION/EXCLUSION CRITERIA Patients must have histologically confirmed low-grade serous/endometrioid ovarian cancer or adult-type granulosa cell tumor with estrogen receptor positivity on immunohistochemistry. Patients need to have recurrent and measurable disease according to Radiologic Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. A maximum of two prior lines of endocrine therapy are allowed, and patients cannot have previously received a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor. Patients with platinum-refractory disease are not allowed in any stage of the study. PRIMARY ENDPOINT Investigator-assessed confirmed overall response rate, defined as the proportion of patients with a complete or partial response according to RECIST v1.1. SAMPLE SIZE 40 to 100 patients will be included, depending on the results of the interim analysis. Patients will be included in Belgium, France and the Netherlands. ESTIMATED DATES FOR COMPLETING ACCRUAL AND PRESENTING RESULTS Patient recruitment will be completed by the end of 2025 and reporting of the final study results will be done by the end of 2027. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT05872204.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Toon van Gorp
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Frédéric Kridelka
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Central University Hospital of Liege, Liege, Belgium
| | - Thaïs Baert
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Hannelore Denys
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Frédéric Selle
- Department of Medical Oncology, Groupe hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint-Simon, Paris, France
| | - Inge Baas
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | | - Diether Lambrechts
- Laboratory of Translational Genetics, VIB-KU Leuven CCB, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Els Van Nieuwenhuysen
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Dogan I, Aydin E, Topuz S, Saip P, Salihoglu MY, Aydiner A. Hormonal Therapy in Pretreated Patients With Recurrent Ovary Granulosa Cell Tumor. J Pharm Pract 2024; 37:146-150. [PMID: 36148892 DOI: 10.1177/08971900221129679] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of hormonal therapy (HT) in patients with recurrent adult ovary granulosa cell tumors. Methods: The clinical and treatments features of the patients who received HT were studied retrospectively. The efficacy and safety of HT were evaluated. The Kaplan-Meier technique was used to conduct survival analysis. Results: The research involved a total of thirteen patients. The median age of the participants was 49 years (range: 34-61). Since diagnosis, the median number of surgeries has been three (range: 2-8). At least one chemotherapy regimen has been administered to 12 (92.3%) patients. Ten of the patients (76.9%) had at least two metastatic areas. Lung metastases were found in two (15.4%) of the patients. Inhibin B levels were elevated in 81.2% of patients before hormone treatment. The patients received different HTs (Leuprolide acetate + anastrozole-three patients, leuprolide acetate + tamoxifen-six patients, only anastrozole-three patients, only tamoxifen-one patients). The median progression-free survival was found 17.7 months (95 % CI: 14.7-20.6). In four (33.4%) patients, an overall response (complete or partial) was identified. A stable response was observed in eight (66.7%) patients. Conclusions: HT is effective in pretreated individuals with recurrent ovarian granulosa cell tumors, according to this research. Despite the limited number of patients and treatment variability, disease control was achieved in all patients. Also, we found that Inhibin B levels were associated with treatment response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Izzet Dogan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institute of Oncology, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Esra Aydin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institute of Oncology, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Samet Topuz
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Pinar Saip
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institute of Oncology, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Mehmet Y Salihoglu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Adnan Aydiner
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institute of Oncology, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Liu Y, Chen J, Lu Z, Chang X, Wang P, Ma H, Chen X, Mo S, Lv Z, Mao X, Zong L, Yu S, Chen J. Clinicopathological analysis of patients with molecularly confirmed stage I adult granulosa cell tumors and prediction of recurrence. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 176:106-114. [PMID: 37481922 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Revised: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 07/25/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Adult granulosa cell tumors (AGCTs) are rare malignancies that accounts for approximately 1% of ovarian neoplasms. As there are currently no well-recognized models for predicting relapse-free survival (RFS), we performed a clinicopathological analysis to identify risk factors for AGCT recurrence. METHODS We investigated 130 patients with pathologically diagnosed AGCT as confirmed by the presence of the characteristic FOXL2 C402G mutation. RESULTS Most patients had International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage I disease (n = 122, 95.3%). The 10-year RFS rate was 31.4% (22/70) and mean 10-year RFS was 74.4 (95% CI, 65.2-83.7) months. Ten patients experienced recurrence beyond the 10-year follow-up period. Undergoing fertility sparing surgery, an estrogen receptor-α (ERα) score (>0.25), and a Ki-67 index >15% were independent risk factors for recurrence in patients with stage I disease (bias-corrected C-index: 0.776). We constructed a nomogram with well-fitting calibration plots; the areas under the curve (AUCs) for 5-, and 10-year RFS prediction were 0.883 and 0.906 respectively. A simplified model with 3 predictive factors (ERα score, Ki-67 index, and primary surgical procedure) and 2 risk stratification subgroups (low- and high-risk) was constructed; its AUCs for 5-, and 10-year RFS prediction were 0.825 and 0.850 respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed significant differences in 10-year RFS between the low- and high-risk groups (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The type of primary surgical procedure, ERα score, and Ki-67 index are independent predictors of recurrence for patients with stage I AGCT. Our predictive model based on these factors showed good performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yilin Liu
- Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Jingci Chen
- Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Zhaohui Lu
- Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Xiaoyan Chang
- Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Pengyan Wang
- Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Heng Ma
- Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Xianlong Chen
- Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Shengwei Mo
- Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Zhuoyao Lv
- Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Xinxin Mao
- Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Liju Zong
- Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Shuangni Yu
- Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China.
| | - Jie Chen
- Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hanvic B, Lecuru F, Vanacker H, Pautier P, Narducci F, Cherifi F, Floquet A, Angeles MA, Berton D, Pomel C, Kalbacher E, Provansal M, Fernandez Y, Rouge TDLM, Roméo C, Laas E, Morice P, Hudry D, Meriaux E, Guyon F, Illac-Vauquelin C, Selle F, Meeus P, Genestie C, Salleron J, Ray-Coquard I. Impact of surgery and chemotherapy in ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors from the multicentric Salomé study including 469 patients. A TMRG and GINECO group study. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 174:190-199. [PMID: 37210929 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.05.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Revised: 05/06/2023] [Accepted: 05/12/2023] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Identifying prognostic factors and evaluating the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with sex cord stromal tumors (SCST) is crucial. In this study, we aimed to address these challenges. METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis of data from 13 centers of the French Rare malignant gynecological tumors (TMRG) network. We enrolled 469 adult patients with malignant SCST who received upfront surgery since 2011 to July 2015. RESULTS 75% were diagnosed with adult Granulosa cell tumors, and 23% had another subtype. With a median follow-up of 6.4 years, 154 patients (33%) developed a first recurrence, 82 (17%) two recurrences, and 49 (10%) three recurrences. Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered in 14.7% of patients at initial diagnosis. In relapse, perioperative chemotherapy was administered in 58.5%, 28.2%, and 23.8% of patients, respectively, in the first, second, and third relapse. In the first-line therapy, age under 70 years, FIGO stage, and complete surgery were associated with longer progression-free survival (PFS). Chemotherapy had no impact on PFS in early-stage disease (FIGO I-II). The PFS was similar using BEP or other chemotherapy regimens (HR 0.88 [0.43; 1.81]) in the first-line therapy. In case of recurrence, PFS was statistically prolonged by complete surgery, but perioperative chemotherapy use did not impact PFS. CONCLUSION Chemotherapy use did not impact survival in the first-line or relapse setting in SCST. Only surgery and its quality demonstrated benefit for PFS in ovarian SCST in any lines of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Anne Floquet
- Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | | | - Dominique Berton
- Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, site René Gauducheau, Nantes, France
| | | | - Elsa Kalbacher
- Medical Oncology CHU de Besançon, Hôpital Jean Minjoz, Besançon, France
| | | | - Yolanda Fernandez
- Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Nancy, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Frédéric Selle
- Medical Oncology, Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint Simon, Hôpital de la Croix Saint Simon, Paris, France
| | | | | | - Julia Salleron
- Biostatistics, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Nancy, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Xia L, Qiu S, Kong FB, Lai J, Huang H, Hu H, Liu X, Ye Z, Cao J. Epidemiology and Nomogram for Predicting the Cancer-specific Survival of Ovarian Granulosa Cell Tumor: A Seer database study. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 2023; 52:102601. [PMID: 37156420 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2023.102601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2023] [Revised: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 05/04/2023] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE ovarian granulosa cell tumor (OGCT) is a kind of infrequent ovarian malignant tumor with limited epidemiological data available. we established a predictive nomograph to verify the clinical prognosis. METHODS 1005 diagnosed with ovarian granulosa cell tumor (OGCT) were extracted from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) public database from 2000-2018. Kaplan-Meier analysis was applied to distinguish risk factors, univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were used to determine the independent prognostic factors for cancer-specific survival (CSS) of OGCT patients. The obtained prognostic variables were combined to construct a nomogram model for predicting CSS in OGCT patients. RESULTS Model performance was detected and evaluated with ROC curves and calibration plots. Data collected from 1005 patients were divided into two groups: training cohort(n=703,70%) and validation cohort(n=302,30%). The multivariate Cox model identified five covariates including age, marital status, AJCC stages, surgery and chemotherapy as independent interfering factors of CSS. The nomogram has shown a promising and excellent accuracy in evaluating 3 -, 5 -, 8-year CSS in OGCT patients. In terms of the CSS of the training cohort, the AUC values of the 3 -, 5 -, 8-year ROC curves were 0.819,0.8,0.819, while in terms of the CSS of the validation cohort, the AUC values of the validation cohort were 0.822,0.84,0.823, respectively. All the calibration curves showed pleasant consistency between predicted and actual survival rates. The nomogram model established in the study can improve the veracity of prognosis prediction, thereby improving the accuracy of individualized survival risk assessment, and providing targeted and constructive recommendations for specific treatment options. CONCLUSION Age, advanced clinical stage, widower and without surgery therapy are independent risk factors for poor prognosis and the nomogram we constructed can help clinicians efficiently recognize high-risk OGCT patients to guide targeted therapies and improve their outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Longjie Xia
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Jinan University, 613 West Huangpu Avenue, Tianhe District, Guangzhou 510630, China.; Department of General Surgery, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou, No. 1 Panfu Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou 510180, China
| | - Shenghui Qiu
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Jinan University, 613 West Huangpu Avenue, Tianhe District, Guangzhou 510630, China.; Department of General Surgery, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou, No. 1 Panfu Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou 510180, China
| | - Fan-Biao Kong
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Jinan University, 613 West Huangpu Avenue, Tianhe District, Guangzhou 510630, China.; Department of Colorectal and Anal Surgery, The People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, 6 Taoyuan Road, Nanning, Guangxi Zhuang autonomous region 530021, People's Republic of China.; Institute of Minimally Invasive Technology and Applications Guangxi Academy of Medical Science,6 Taoyuan Road, Nanning, Guangxi Zhuang autonomous region 530021, People's Republic of China
| | - Jianqin Lai
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Jinan University, 613 West Huangpu Avenue, Tianhe District, Guangzhou 510630, China.; Department of General Surgery, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou, No. 1 Panfu Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou 510180, China
| | - Huixian Huang
- Department of Plastic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, No. 58 Zhongshan Road 2, Guangzhou 510080, China
| | - Huiqiong Hu
- Department of General Surgery, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou, No. 1 Panfu Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou 510180, China
| | - Xiangxia Liu
- Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA 38138..
| | - Zi Ye
- Department of Emergency, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, No. 58 Zhongshan Road 2, Guangzhou 510080, China.
| | - Jie Cao
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Jinan University, 613 West Huangpu Avenue, Tianhe District, Guangzhou 510630, China.; Department of General Surgery, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou, No. 1 Panfu Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou 510180, China.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lebreton C, Quesada S, Bini M, Babin G, Rossi L, Chopin N, Croce S, Hartog C, Renaud T, Gaillard AL, Petit A, Serre AA, Trédan O, Rowinski E, Cockenpot V, Treilleux I, Rousset-Jablonski C, Méeus P, Guyon F, Ray-Coquard I. [Treatments for rare ovarian tumors: What's new?]. Bull Cancer 2023:S0007-4551(23)00151-0. [PMID: 37045734 DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2023.03.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2023] [Revised: 03/03/2023] [Accepted: 03/08/2023] [Indexed: 04/14/2023]
Abstract
Even if each rare ovarian tumor (ROT) has a low incidence, the sum of all these entities represents almost the half of all ovarian neoplasms. Thus, development of dedicated clinical trial emerged as a prerequisite to improve their managements. Owing to the spreading of dedicated institutional networks and (supra)national collaborations, the number of clinical trials has increased the past few years, with different types of trials; while some focused on specific molecular features, others assessed innovative molecules. Furthermore, relevant randomized clinical trials were designed as a mean to position new treatment options. Currently, innovative molecular-driven trials, based on master protocol trials are emerging and may shed light towards the improvement of personalized medicine regarding ROT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Coriolan Lebreton
- Institut Bergonié, département d'oncologie médicale, Bordeaux, France; University of Bordeaux, ARTiSt Lab, Inserm U1312, Bordeaux, France.
| | - Stanislas Quesada
- Institut régional du cancer de Montpellier, département d'oncologie médicale, Montpellier, France
| | - Marta Bini
- Instituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italie
| | - Guillaume Babin
- University of Bordeaux, ARTiSt Lab, Inserm U1312, Bordeaux, France; Institut Bergonié, département de chirurgie, Bordeaux, France
| | - Léa Rossi
- Centre Léon-Bérard, département de chirurgie, Lyon, France
| | - Nicolas Chopin
- Centre Léon-Bérard, département de chirurgie, Lyon, France
| | - Sabrina Croce
- Institut Bergonié, département de biopathologie, Bordeaux, France; University of Bordeaux, SARCOTARGET Lab, Inserm U1312, Bordeaux, France
| | - Cécile Hartog
- University of Bordeaux, ARTiSt Lab, Inserm U1312, Bordeaux, France; Centre Léon-Bérard, département de chirurgie, Lyon, France
| | - Tiphaine Renaud
- Institut Bergonié, département de gynécologie médicale, Bordeaux, France
| | | | - Adeline Petit
- Institut Bergonié, département de radiothérapie et curiethérapie, Bordeaux, France
| | - Anne-Agathe Serre
- Centre Léon-Bérard, département de radiothérapie et curiethérapie, Lyon, France
| | - Olivier Trédan
- Centre Léon-Bérard, département d'oncologie médicale, Lyon, France
| | - Elise Rowinski
- Centre Léon-Bérard, département d'oncologie médicale, Lyon, France
| | | | | | | | - Pierre Méeus
- Centre Léon-Bérard, département de chirurgie, Lyon, France
| | - Frédéric Guyon
- Institut Bergonié, département de chirurgie, Bordeaux, France
| | - Isabelle Ray-Coquard
- Centre Léon-Bérard, département d'oncologie médicale, Lyon, France; University of Claude-Bernard Lyon 1, health services and performance research lab (EA 7425 HESPER), Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Plett H, Ricciardi E, Vacaru V, Ramspott JP, Colombo N, Sehouli J, du Bois A, Garbi A, Richter R, Ataseven B, Aletti G, Braicu E, Heitz F, Portuesi R, Muallem MZ, Dagres T, Parma G, Roser E, Traut A, Multinu F, Harter P. Adult ovarian granulosa cell tumors: analysis of outcomes and risk factors for recurrence. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2023; 33:734-740. [PMID: 36759002 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-003854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/11/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Adult granulosa cell tumors represent less than 5% of all ovarian malignancies. The aim of this study was to analyze the clinicopathological parameters and their impact on progression-free and overall survival. METHODS Patients with primary adult granulosa cell tumors treated in three international referral centers between July 1999 and December 2018 were included. The following data were anonymously exported from the prospective database: age at diagnosis, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, adjuvant therapy, surgical procedures, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Descriptive statistical analysis regarding tumor and treatment characteristics was performed. Survival analyses included Kaplan-Meier functions and Cox proportional hazard ratios (HR). RESULTS A total of 168 patients with primary adult granulosa cell tumors were included. Median age was 50 years (range 13-82). With regard to stage distribution, 54.2% (n=91) of patients were FIGO stage IA, 1.2% (n=2) were stage IB, 26.8% (n=45) were stage IC, and 17.9% (n=30) were FIGO stage II-IV. 66.7% (n=112) of patients underwent surgical restaging, of whom 17.9% (n=20) were moved to a higher stage. In addition, 36 (21.4%) patients underwent fertility-sparing surgery. After a median follow-up of 61 months (range 0-209), 10.7% of patients (n=18) had recurrent disease and 4.8% (n=8) died of disease. Five-year progression-free survival was 86.1% and estimated overall survival was 95.7%. Five-year progression-free survival was worse for patients with advanced stages (FIGO stage IA/B vs IC: HR 5.09 (95% CI 1.53 to 16.9); FIGO stage IA/B vs II-IV: HR 5.62 (95% CI 1.58 to 19.9)). Nineteen patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy had lower estimated 5-year progression-free survival compared with patients not receiving chemotherapy (49.7% vs 91.1%, p<0.001; HR 9.15 (95% CI 3.62 to 23.1)). CONCLUSION The prognosis of patients with primary adult granulosa cell tumors is mainly determined by FIGO stage. The outcome of patients with FIGO stage IC is comparable to those with advanced stages. Fertility-sparing surgery seems to be a safe procedure in stage IA. Our data do not support the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in early and advanced stages of adult granulosa cell tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helmut Plett
- Department of Gynecology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany .,Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Ev. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany.,Department of Gynecology with Center for Oncological Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Enzo Ricciardi
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ospedale Sandro Pertini, Rome, Italy.,Department of Gynecology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Vlad Vacaru
- Department of Gynecology with Center for Oncological Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany.,Division of Gynecology, Vivantes Humboldt-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jan Philipp Ramspott
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Ev. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany.,Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Nicoletta Colombo
- Department of Gynecology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan, Italy.,Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Jalid Sehouli
- Department of Gynecology with Center for Oncological Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andreas du Bois
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Ev. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Annalisa Garbi
- Department of Gynecology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Rolf Richter
- Department of Gynecology with Center for Oncological Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Beyhan Ataseven
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Ev. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Giovanni Aletti
- Department of Gynecology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Braicu
- Department of Gynecology with Center for Oncological Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Florian Heitz
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Ev. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany.,Department of Gynecology with Center for Oncological Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Rosalba Portuesi
- Department of Gynecology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan, Italy.,IRCCS, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Mustafa-Zelal Muallem
- Department of Gynecology with Center for Oncological Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Virchow Campus Clinic, Charité Medical University, Berlin, Germany
| | - Timoleon Dagres
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Ev. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Gabriella Parma
- Department of Gynecology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Eva Roser
- Department of Gynecology with Center for Oncological Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Alexander Traut
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Ev. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Francesco Multinu
- Department of Gynecology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Philipp Harter
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Ev. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Quesada S, Bini M, Lebreton C, Ray-Coquard I. Update on new treatments for rare ovarian tumours. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2023; 35:27-33. [PMID: 36440753 PMCID: PMC9788923 DOI: 10.1097/gco.0000000000000836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW In spite of their rarity when considered individually, the sum of all rare ovarian tumours (ROT) represent almost half of all ovarian malignancies. As such, their appropriate inclusion within dedicated clinical trials is essential for enhanced management. RECENT FINDINGS Supported by institutional expert national (e.g. TMRG) and international (e.g. ESGO) networks and owing to national (e.g. ARCAGY-GINECO) and international (e.g. ENGOT) collaborations dedicated to clinical research, the last few years have shown increased number of clinical trials dedicated to ROT. These either were based on specific molecular features of ROT (e.g. expression of oestrogen receptors for low-grade serous ovarian carcinomas and anastrazole evaluation in the PARAGON trial) or on the evaluation of innovative therapies (e.g. pembrolizumab within the ROT cohort from the AcSé Pembrolizumab multicentric basket trial). Furthermore, recent years have also shown the advent of randomized clinical trials. For instance, the ALIENOR trial positioned weekly paclitaxel as a new option for relapsed sex cord-stromal tumours, while the GOG281/LOGS trial raised trametinib as a new standard-of-care option for recurrent low-grade serous carcinomas. SUMMARY The last few years have exhibited a paradigm shift towards the possibility to develop dedicated trials for ROT, owing to international collaborations supported by institutional networks. Current trials, molecular-driven and based on innovative designs, are highly promising, as they may bring ROT management towards more personalized medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stanislas Quesada
- Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
- Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Marta Bini
- Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
- Instituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Liu R, Ye L, Yan J, Cao Y, Huang S, Qian Z, Qian T. Transition of ovarian granulosa cell tumor from a solid mass to a cystic mass in two months on MR imaging in an adult woman: A case report. Radiol Case Rep 2023; 18:397-401. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radcr.2022.10.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2022] [Revised: 10/11/2022] [Accepted: 10/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
|
16
|
Vergote I, Gonzalez-Martin A, Lorusso D, Gourley C, Mirza MR, Kurtz JE, Okamoto A, Moore K, Kridelka F, McNeish I, Reuss A, Votan B, du Bois A, Mahner S, Ray-Coquard I, Kohn EC, Berek JS, Tan DSP, Colombo N, Zang R, Concin N, O'Donnell D, Rauh-Hain A, Herrington CS, Marth C, Poveda A, Fujiwara K, Stuart GCE, Oza AM, Bookman MA. Clinical research in ovarian cancer: consensus recommendations from the Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup. Lancet Oncol 2022; 23:e374-e384. [PMID: 35901833 PMCID: PMC9465953 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(22)00139-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2022] [Revised: 02/21/2022] [Accepted: 02/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG) sixth Ovarian Cancer Conference on Clinical Research was held virtually in October, 2021, following published consensus guidelines. The goal of the consensus meeting was to achieve harmonisation on the design elements of upcoming trials in ovarian cancer, to select important questions for future study, and to identify unmet needs. All 33 GCIG member groups participated in the development, refinement, and adoption of 20 statements within four topic groups on clinical research in ovarian cancer including first line treatment, recurrent disease, disease subgroups, and future trials. Unanimous consensus was obtained for 14 of 20 statements, with greater than 90% concordance in the remaining six statements. The high acceptance rate following active deliberation among the GCIG groups confirmed that a consensus process could be applied in a virtual setting. Together with detailed categorisation of unmet needs, these consensus statements will promote the harmonisation of international clinical research in ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ignace Vergote
- Belgium and Luxembourg Gynaecological Oncology Group (BGOG), Leuven, Belgium; University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Antonio Gonzalez-Martin
- Grupo Español de Cáncer de Ovario (GEICO), Madrid, Spain; Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain; Program for Solid Tumors at Madrid, and Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA), Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Domenica Lorusso
- Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian Cancer and Gynecologic Malignancies (MITO), Naples, Italy; Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Charlie Gourley
- Scottish Gynaecological Cancer Trials Group (SGCTG), Cancer Research UK, Edinburgh, UK; Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Mansoor Raza Mirza
- Nordic Society of Gynecologic Oncology Clinical Trial Unit (NSGO-CTU), Copenhagen, Denmark; Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jean-Emmanuel Kurtz
- Groupe d'Investigateurs National des Etudes des Cancers Ovariens et du Sein (GINECO), Paris, France; Strasbourg Cancer Institute, Strasbourg, France
| | - Aikou Okamoto
- Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group (JGOG), Tokyo, Japan; The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kathleen Moore
- Gynecologic Oncology Group-Foundation (GOG-F), Philadelphia, PA, USA; OU Health Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, OH, USA
| | - Frédéric Kridelka
- Belgium and Luxembourg Gynaecological Oncology Group (BGOG), Leuven, Belgium; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Iain McNeish
- National Cancer Research Institute (NCRI), London, UK; Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Alexander Reuss
- Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) Study Group, Munich, Germany; Coordinating Center for Clinical Trials, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany
| | - Bénédicte Votan
- Association de Recherche Cancers Gynécologiques (ARCAGY)-GINECO, Paris, France
| | - Andreas du Bois
- Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) Study Group, Munich, Germany; Kliniken Essen Mitte (KEM), Essen, Germany
| | - Sven Mahner
- Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) Study Group, Munich, Germany; University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany
| | - Isabelle Ray-Coquard
- Groupe d'Investigateurs National des Etudes des Cancers Ovariens et du Sein (GINECO), Paris, France; Centre Leon Berard and University Claude Bernard Lyon I, Lyon, France
| | - Elise C Kohn
- National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Jonathan S Berek
- Women's Cancer Research Network-Cooperative Gynecologic Oncology Investigators (WCRN-COGI), Fresno, CA; Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - David S P Tan
- Asia Pacific Gynecologic Oncology Trials Group (APGOT), Seoul, South Korea; Gynecologic Cancer Group Singapore (GCGS), Singapore; Cancer Science Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Nicoletta Colombo
- Mario Negri Gynecologic Oncology (MaNGO), Milan, Italy; European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy; University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Rongyu Zang
- Shanghai Gynecologic Oncology Group (SGOG), Shanghai, China; Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Nicole Concin
- AGO -Austria, Innsbruck, Austria; Kliniken Essen Mitte (KEM), Essen, Germany; Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Dearbhaile O'Donnell
- Cancer Trials Ireland (CTI), Dublin, Ireland; St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Alejandro Rauh-Hain
- Global Gynecologic Oncology Consortium (G-GOC), Houston, TX, USA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, The University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA
| | - C Simon Herrington
- Scottish Gynaecological Cancer Trials Group (SGCTG), Cancer Research UK, Edinburgh, UK; Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Christian Marth
- AGO -Austria, Innsbruck, Austria; Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Andres Poveda
- Grupo Español de Cáncer de Ovario (GEICO), Madrid, Spain; Hospital Quironsalud, Valencia, Spain
| | - Keiichi Fujiwara
- Gynecologic Cancer Clinical Trials and Investigation Consortium (GOTIC), North Kanto, Japan; Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Gavin C E Stuart
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group (CCTG), Kingston, ON, Canada; University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Amit M Oza
- Princess Margaret Hospital Consortium (PMHC), Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Michael A Bookman
- Gynecologic Oncology Group-Foundation (GOG-F), Philadelphia, PA, USA; San Francisco Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Response to Systemic Therapies in Ovarian Adult Granulosa Cell Tumors: A Literature Review. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14122998. [PMID: 35740663 PMCID: PMC9221362 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14122998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2022] [Revised: 06/12/2022] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Adult granulosa cell tumors (aGCTs) are a rare subtype of ovarian cancer. First choice of treatment is surgery; when this is not possible, chemotherapy and anti-hormonal therapy are often used. There is limited evidence on the effect of systemic therapy in aGCT. The aim of our systematic review is to provide an overview of the response to chemotherapy and anti-hormonal therapy in patients with aGCT. We found very few articles reporting the response to chemotherapy and anti-hormonal therapy in only aGCT. The available data showed a moderate response to chemotherapy and anti-hormonal therapy, but if patients who achieve stable disease are also taken into account, the response is higher. This may mean that surgery can be postponed for a longer period of time. Abstract For adult granulosa cell tumors (aGCTs), the preferred treatment modality is surgery. Chemotherapy and anti-hormonal therapy are also frequently used in patients with recurrent aGCT. We aimed to review the existing literature on the response to chemotherapy and anti-hormonal therapy in patients with aGCT. Embase and MEDLINE were searched from inception to November 2021 for eligible studies. Objective response rate (ORR) was calculated as the total number of cases with a complete response (CR) or a partial response (PR). Disease control rate (DCR) was defined as the sum of cases with CR, PR or stable disease (SD). A total of 10 studies were included that reported on chemotherapy and 13 studies were included that reported on anti-hormonal therapy. The response rates of the 56 chemotherapy regimens that could be evaluated resulted in an ORR of 30% and DCR of 58%. For anti-hormonal therapy, the results of 73 regimens led to an ORR of 11% and a DCR of 66%. Evidence on systemic therapy in aGCT only is limited. For both chemotherapy and anti-hormonal therapy, the ORR is limited, but the response is considerably higher when patients achieving SD are included. New approaches are needed to provide more evidence and standardize treatment in aGCT.
Collapse
|
18
|
Edmondson RJ, O'Connell RL, Banerjee S, Mileshkin L, Sykes P, Beale P, Fisher A, Bonaventura A, Millan D, Nottley S, Benson C, Hamilton A, Sjoquist K, Alexander L, Kelly C, Carty K, Divers L, Bradshaw N, Friedlander M. Phase 2 study of anastrozole in rare cohorts of patients with estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor positive leiomyosarcomas and carcinosarcomas of the uterine corpus: The PARAGON trial (ANZGOG 0903). Gynecol Oncol 2021; 163:524-530. [PMID: 34625284 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.09.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2021] [Revised: 09/13/2021] [Accepted: 09/15/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Aromatase inhibitors have been used empirically to treat a subset of patients with hormone receptor positive uterine leiomyosarcomas(LMS) and carcinosarcomas (UCS) mainly supported by retrospective data. We evaluated the activity of anastrozole in two rare cohorts; patients with recurrent/metastatic LMS and UCS enrolled in PARAGON, a basket trial of anastrozole in estrogen receptor (ER+)/progesterone receptor positive (PR+) gynecological cancers. METHOD An investigator-initiated, single-arm, prospective open-label trial of anastrozole 1 mg/day in patients with ER &/or PR + ve LMS or UCS with measurable disease, treated until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint was clinical benefit (complete/partial response + stable disease) rate (CBR) at 3 months. Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival (PFS), quality of life and toxicity. RESULTS 39 eligible patients were enrolled, 32 with LMS and 7 with UCS. For the LMS cohort CBR at 3 months was 35% (95% CI: 21-53%) with a median duration of clinical benefit of 5.8 months. Best response was a partial response in one patient. Two patients remained on treatment for more than one year. The median progression-free survival was 2.8 months (95% CI: 2.6-4.9). For the UCS cohort CBR at 3 months was 43% (95% CI: 16-75%) with a median duration of clinical benefit of 5.6 months. Stable disease was seen in 3 patients but no objective responses were seen. The median progression-free survival was 2.7 months (95% CI, 1.1-8.2). Safety was acceptable with 5/39 evaluable patients showing grade 3 toxicities. CONCLUSION Whilst objective response rates with anastrozole are low, the clinical benefit rate and good tolerance suggests that aromatase inhibitor therapy may have a role in a subset of patients with metastatic LMS and UCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R J Edmondson
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester, UK; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, St Mary's Hospital, Central Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Level 5, Research, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK.
| | - R L O'Connell
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - S Banerjee
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - L Mileshkin
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - P Sykes
- Dept of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Otago, New Zealand
| | - P Beale
- Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - A Fisher
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Gateshead, UK
| | - A Bonaventura
- School of Medicine & Public Health, University of Newcastle, Australia
| | - D Millan
- Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK
| | - S Nottley
- Royal Hospital for Women/Prince of Wales Hospital and Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - C Benson
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - A Hamilton
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - K Sjoquist
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - L Alexander
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, UK
| | - C Kelly
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, UK
| | - K Carty
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, UK
| | - L Divers
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, UK
| | - N Bradshaw
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|