Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery for the treatment of stage I endometrial cancer

Is robotic surgery beneficial for the treatment of endometrial cancer? A comparison with conventional laparoscopic surgery

Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the oncologic outcomes between those who underwent robotic surgery or conventional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer. Method: We performed a retrospective review of patients from a single institution who underwent either laparoscopic or robotic surgery for the treatment of endometrial cancer between January 2010 and December 2020. Tumor characteristics, recurrence rate, disease-free survival, and overall survival were compared according to surgical approach. Results: Among the 268 patients included in this study, 95 underwent robotic surgery (35.4%) and 173 underwent laparoscopic surgery (64.6%). The median follow-up durations were 51 and 59 months for the robotic surgery and laparoscopic surgery groups, respectively (p = 0.085). The recurrence rate did not differ significantly between the two groups. (p = 0.371). Disease-free survival (p = 0.721) and overall survival (p = 0.453) were similar between the two groups. In both univariate and multivariate analyses, the type of surgery was not related to disease-free survival. The median total cost per admission was significantly higher for RS than for LS (12,123 vs. 6,884 USD, p < 0.0001). Conclusion: With consistently greater costs and similar survival outcomes, robotic systems have few advantages compared with laparoscopy.

Multidirectional Traction Method Using SURGICEL NU-KNIT and Surgical Suture in Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Surgery for Endometrial Cancer

OBJECTIVE

To describe a novel approach to robot-assisted laparoscopic total hysterectomy (RH) for endometrial cancer that minimizes cancer sell spillage and develops a stable surgical field.

DESIGN

Demonstration of the multidirectional traction method with narrated video footage.

SETTING

Many reports have indicated that RH for endometrial cancer has the same or superior short-term results compared with conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH), and the long-term prognosis is the same [1,2]. However, there are no randomized controlled trials of RH versus LH, and some previous reports [3] have suggested that RH has a worse prognosis than LH, so the long-term prognosis should be considered with caution. Factors that may affect the long-term prognosis include the use of uterine manipulators [4] and compression of the uterine body with robotic forceps without tactile sensation [3]. However, to the best of our knowledge, no surgical technique capable of avoiding these factors has been established yet. Herein, we report a multidirectional traction method using SURGICEL NU-KNIT (Ethicon; Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), a local hemostatic agent, and surgical sutures.

INTERVENTION

Cut 2-0 Prolene (Ethicon; Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) with straight needles (ST-70) thread to 35 cm, stick a 1 × 2 cm piece of SURGICEL NU-KNIT, and make knots Fig. 1. This implement is used to puncture the incisional margins of the peritoneum and then the abdominal wall to bring the thread to the surface of the body, where it is grasped with forceps and fixed. By repeating this operation, multidirectional traction can be obtained Fig. 2. A manipulating suture is also attached to the uterus to minimize the compression of the uterine body with robotic forceps.

CONCLUSION

The multidirectional traction method allows for reproducible stable surgical field development and minimizes cancer cell spillage by reducing uterine grasping by robotic forceps without the use of uterine manipulators.

Initial experience with the da Vinci SP robot-assisted surgical staging of endometrial cancer: a retrospective comparison with conventional laparotomy

To compare the perioperative outcomes of surgical staging performed using conventional laparotomy (LT) or the da Vinci SP robotic system (SP) in patients with endometrial cancer. We retrospectively analyzed 180 patients with stage I-III endometrial cancer who underwent surgical staging using LT (n = 126) or SP (n = 54) at the Yonsei Cancer Center between November 2018 and December 2022. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to mitigate potential confounding biases. Fifty-one pairs of patients were matched by PSM. SP required longer total operation time than LT (221 vs. 142 min in SP vs. LT, respectively, p < 0.001). However, estimated blood loss and postoperative hemoglobin change were lower in SP than in LT (30 vs. 100 mL, p < 0.001; 0.6 vs. 1.6 g/dL, p < 0.001 for SP vs. LT respectively). Furthermore, postoperative minor complications (13.7% in SP vs. 33.3% in LT, p = 0.02), perioperative transfusion rate (0% in SP vs. 11.8% in LT, p = 0.03), and postoperative hospital stay (2 days for SP vs. 8 days for LT, p < 0.001) were lower in SP than in LT. Although the patient-controlled analgesia administration rate was lower in SP (13.8% in SP vs. 100% in LT, p < 0.001), the median postoperative pain score at 6, 12, and 24 h after surgery was lower in SP than in LT (2 vs. 3, p = 0.002; 2 vs. 3, p = 0.005; 2 vs. 3, p = 0.001 for SP vs. LT, respectively). Although SP required longer total operation time, it demonstrated several advantages over LT in endometrial cancer staging.

Oncologic outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopy versus conventional laparoscopy for the treatment of apparent early-stage endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the uterus

OBJECTIVE

To compare long-term oncologic outcomes in patients with clinically uterine-confined endometrioid endometrial cancer who underwent surgical staging with robot-assisted (RA) versus conventional laparoscopy.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of patients with newly diagnosed, uterine-confined endometrioid endometrial cancer who were treated and had primary surgery at our institution between 1/1/2009-1/1/2018. Clinicopathologic, surgical, and survival data were collected. Appropriate statistical methods were applied.

RESULTS

Of 1728 patients identified, 1389 (80.4%) underwent RA and 339 (19.6%) conventional laparoscopy. At diagnosis, median age was 60 years (range, 24-92) and median BMI was 30.2 kg/m2 (range, 15.1-71.5). In the RA group, patients had longer operative time (170 vs 152 min, P < .001), lower conversion rate to laparotomy (0.6% vs 4.7%, P < .001), and a higher proportion had a BMI > 40 kg/m2 (17.2% vs 11.5%, P = .01) and same-day discharge (19.2% vs 5.3%, P < .001). Overall, 93% (RA) and 90% (conventional) of patients underwent lymph node assessment (P = .1). Comparing the RA versus conventional groups, final surgical stage on pathology (P = .6), median follow-up (55.7 vs 52.9 months, P = .4), and rates of perioperative complications (9.9% vs 7.7%, P = .6), recurrence (9.5% vs 7.4%, P = .3), 5-year PFS (88.5% vs 91.0%, P = .3), and 5-year OS (92.5% vs 92.4%, P = .7) were not significantly different. No significant increase in risk of recurrence (HR = 1.2, 95% CI: 0.8-1.9, P = .3) or poorer OS outcomes (HR = 0.9, 95% CI: 0.6-1.4, P = .7) were observed in the RA group.

CONCLUSION

In uterine-confined endometrioid endometrial cancers, surgical staging using RA laparoscopy was not associated with adverse survival outcomes compared to conventional laparoscopy.

Laparoscopy with transverse-abdominal extra-fascial hysterectomy for early-stage endometrial carcinoma, obesity, and large uterus: A case report

RATIONALE

Removal of a large uterus poses a challenge in minimally invasive surgery for patients with early-stage endometrial cancer. This manuscript presents 3 cases performed the improved surgical procedure with minimal trauma.

PATIENT CONCERNS

Three patients with obesity (Body Mass Index: 31.93, 30.06, and 51.82 kg/m2) and large uterus (7.3 × 8.0 × 7.6 cm, 8.5 × 8.9 × 8.5 cm, and 8.3 × 10.1 × 6.9 cm) visited our hospital because of vaginal bleeding, and received dilation and curettage. Pathological examination revealed endometrial carcinoma.

DIAGNOSES

Endometrial carcinoma, obesity.

INTERVENTION

Laparoscopy and transverse-abdominal extra-fascial hysterectomy were performed. First, we performed bilateral adnexectomy, pelvic lymph node dissection, and para-aortic lymph node sampling, and exposed and separated the para-uterine tissue and bladder before cutting off the uterus from the vagina through laparoscopy. Second, we made a 10 cm suprapubic transverse incision in the lower abdomen, clamped the vagina using right-angle forceps to follow the principle of tumor-free technique, placed the uterus in a surgical bag for retrieval the uterus immediately from the incision.

OUTCOME

All 3 patients underwent intestinal recovery for 24 hours post operation; 50 mL blood was lost during the operation with a well-healing wound and no complication. Till date, there has been no recurrence or metastasis in any of them.

LESSONS

Improving the surgical procedure could enhance safety and ease of operation even in cases of obesity and a large uterus.

Efficacy and prognosis of robotic surgery with sentinel node navigation surgery in endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to validate the surgical and oncologic outcomes of robotic surgery with sentinel node navigation surgery (SNNS) in endometrial cancer.

METHODS

This study included 130 patients with endometrial cancer, who underwent robotic surgery, including hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and pelvic SNNS at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Kagoshima University Hospital. Pelvic sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) were identified using the uterine cervix 99m Technetium-labeled phytate and indocyanine green injections. Surgery-related and survival outcomes were also evaluated.

RESULTS

The median operative and console times and volume of blood loss were 204 (range: 101-555) minutes, 152 (range: 70-453) minutes, and 20 (range: 2-620) mL, respectively. The bilateral and unilateral pelvic SLN detection rates were 90.0% (117/130) and 5.4% (7/130), respectively, and the identification rate (the rate at which at least one SLN could be identified on either side) was 95% (124/130). Lower extremity lymphedema occurred in only 1 patient (0.8%), and no pelvic lymphocele occurred. Recurrence occurred in 3 patients (2.3%), and the recurrence site was the abdominal cavity, with dissemination in 2 patients and vaginal stump in one. The 3-year recurrence-free survival and 3-year overall survival rates were 97.1% and 98.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Robotic surgery with SNNS for endometrial cancer showed a high SLN identification rate, low occurrence rates of lower extremity lymphedema and pelvic lymphocele, and excellent oncologic outcomes.

Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: long-term comparison of outcomes

Objective

There is a lack of multi-institutional large-volume and long-term follow-up data on comparisons between robot-assisted surgery and conventional laparoscopic surgery. This study compared the surgical and long-term survival outcomes between patients who underwent robot-assisted or conventional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the data of patients from five large academic institutions who underwent either robot-assisted or conventional laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of endometrial cancer between 2012 and 2017, ensuring at least 5 years of potential follow-up. Intra- and postoperative outcomes, long-term disease-free survival, and overall survival were compared.

Results

The study cohort included 1,003 unselected patients: 551 and 452 patients received conventional laparoscopic and robot-assisted surgery, respectively. The median follow-up duration was 57 months. Postoperative complications were significantly less likely to occur in the robot-assisted surgery group compared to the laparoscopic surgery group (7.74% vs. 13.79%, P = 0.002), primarily limited to minor complications. There were no significant differences in survival: 5-year disease-free survival was 91.2% versus 90.0% (P = 0.628) and overall survival was 97.9% versus 96.8% (P = 0.285) in the robot-assisted and laparoscopic surgery cohorts, respectively. Cox proportional hazard regression models demonstrated that the mode of surgery was not associated with disease-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.897; confidence interval, 0.563-1.429) or overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.791; confidence interval, 0.330-1.895) after adjusting for confounding factors.

Conclusion

Robot-assisted surgery for endometrial cancer demonstrates comparable long-term survival outcomes and a reduced incidence of postoperative minor complications when compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery.

Survival outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopy versus conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Robotic-assisted laparoscopy (RALS) has gained widespread acceptance in the field of gynecological oncology. However, whether the prognosis of endometrial cancer after RALS is superior to conventional laparoscopy (CLS) and laparotomy (LT) remains inconclusive. Therefore, the aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the long-term survival outcomes of RALS with CLS and LT for endometrial cancer.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted on electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane, EMBASE and Web of Science) until May 24, 2022, followed by a manual search. Based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, publications investigating long-term survival outcomes after RALS vs CLS or LT in endometrial cancer patients were collected. The primary outcomes included overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), recurrence-free survival (RFS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Fixed effects models or random effects models were employed to calculate the pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) as appropriate. Heterogeneity and publication bias were also assessed.

RESULTS

RALS and CLS had no difference in OS (HR = 0.962, 95% CI: 0.922-1.004), RFS (HR = 1.096, 95% CI: 0.947-1.296), and DSS (HR = 1.489, 95% CI: 0.713-3.107) for endometrial cancer; however, RALS was significantly associated with favorable OS (HR = 0.682, 95% CI: 0.576-0.807), RFS (HR = 0.793, 95% CI: 0.653-0.964), and DSS (HR = 0.441, 95% CI: 0.298-0.652) when compared with LT. In the subgroup analysis of effect measures and follow-up length, RALS showed comparable or superior RFS/OS to CLS and LT. In early-stage endometrial cancer patients, RALS had similar OS but worse RFS than CLS.

CONCLUSIONS

RALS is safe in the management of endometrial cancer, with long-term oncological outcomes equivalent to CLS and superior to LT.

Clinical Relevance of Uterine Manipulation on Oncologic Outcome in Robot-Assisted versus Open Surgery in the Management of Endometrial Cancer

In this study, we investigated the impact of uterine manipulation on endometrial cancer survival outcomes. We analyzed patients with endometrial cancer who underwent robot-assisted staging and open staging surgery between 2010 and 2020. Either uterine manipulators or vaginal tubes were utilized in robot-assisted staging. Propensity score matching was performed to correct baseline characteristics. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curve analysis. In total, 574 patients, including those undergoing robot-assisted staging with a uterine manipulator (n = 213) or vaginal tube (n = 147) and staging laparotomy (n = 214), were analyzed. Propensity score matching was performed for age, histology, and stage as covariates. Before matching, Kaplan-Meier curve analysis showed that PFS and OS were significantly different among the three groups (p < 0.001 and p = 0.009, respectively). In the propensity-matched cohorts of 147 women, the previously suggested differences in PFS and OS were not observed in patients undergoing robot-assisted staging with a uterine manipulator or vaginal tube or open surgery. In conclusion, robotic surgery using a uterine manipulator or vaginal tube did not compromise survival outcomes in endometrial cancer management.

Therapeutic Benefit of Systematic Lymphadenectomy in Node-Negative Uterine-Confined Endometrioid Endometrial Carcinoma: Omission of Adjuvant Therapy

Simple Summary

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecological tract malignancy in developed countries. Extrauterine disease, in particular lymph node metastasis, is an important prognostic factor. Nevertheless, pelvic lymphadenectomy is not considered to have a therapeutic benefit, as it did not improve survival in randomized studies. However, lymphadenectomy may have a therapeutic benefit if adjuvant therapy can be omitted without decreasing oncological outcomes, as the long-term quality of life is maintained by avoiding morbidities associated with adjuvant therapy. In intermediate- and high-risk endometrioid endometrial carcinomas, adjuvant therapy may be safely omitted without decreasing long-term survival by open surgery including systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy when patients are node-negative. Systematic lymphadenectomy may remove undetectable low-volume lymph node metastasis in both pelvic and para-aortic regions, and open surgery may reduce vaginal recurrence even without vaginal brachytherapy. However, lymphadenectomy may not improve survival in elderly patients and patients with p53-mutant tumors.

Abstract

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecological tract malignancy in developed countries, and its incidence has been increasing globally with rising obesity rates and longer life expectancy. In endometrial cancer, extrauterine disease, in particular lymph node metastasis, is an important prognostic factor. Nevertheless, pelvic lymphadenectomy is not considered to have a therapeutic benefit, as it did not improve survival in randomized studies. However, lymphadenectomy may have a therapeutic benefit if adjuvant therapy can be omitted without decreasing oncological outcomes, as the long-term quality of life is maintained by avoiding morbidities associated with adjuvant therapy. In intermediate- and high-risk endometrioid endometrial carcinomas, adjuvant therapy may be safely omitted without decreasing long-term survival by open surgery including systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy when patients are node-negative. Systematic lymphadenectomy may remove undetectable low-volume lymph node metastasis in both pelvic and para-aortic regions, and open surgery may reduce vaginal recurrence even without vaginal brachytherapy. However, lymphadenectomy may not improve survival in elderly patients and patients with p53-mutant tumors. In this review, I discuss the characteristics of lymph node metastasis, the methods of lymph node assessment, and the therapeutic benefits of systematic lymphadenectomy in patients with intermediate- and high-risk endometrioid endometrial carcinoma.

Current Approaches to the Management of Patients with Endometrial Cancer

Simple Summary

New data, the development of new methods of treatment and management and the rising incidence of endometrial cancer require constant reviewing, in order to inform healthcare professionals about the current approaches to endometrial cancer. This review aims to present old, new and emerging perspectives in the management of endometrial cancer and evaluate the existing therapeutic strategies, by assessing the different surgical routes, the position of adjuvant therapies in the treatment of endometrial cancer and the implementation of SLNB. Upon reviewing literature data, it became clear that minimally invasive surgery is becoming gradually the preferred route of surgery, whereas SLNB is gaining more ground and could yield important information about the management needed in low-risk and high-risk endometrial cancer.

Abstract

The incidence of endometrial cancer (EC) is rising and healthcare professionals need to be informed about the latest data on the constant developments in the field of its management. With particular interest in the classification and management of EC, we surveyed current literature, national and international data, and guidelines, as well as the latest studies to present the most recent data regarding the management of EC. It became evident that despite the consensus on low-risk EC, there are still controversies surrounding the management of high-risk EC, especially regarding the role of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). Our aim is to present the old and new perspectives in the management of EC, the different available surgical routes, the possible desire for fertility preservation, the role of adjuvant therapies and the focus on the advantages and the limitations of the implementation of SLNB in therapeutic strategies. It became evident throughout our search and based on literature data that minimally invasive surgery (MIS) leads to satisfying outcomes, thus becoming gradually the preferred route of surgery, while SLNB could provide essential information and guidance about the overall management needed in cases of both low-risk and high-risk EC.