1
|
Creutzberg CL, Kim JW, Eminowicz G, Allanson E, Eberst L, Kim SI, Nout RA, Park JY, Lorusso D, Mileshkin L, Ottevanger PB, Brand A, Mezzanzanica D, Oza A, Gebski V, Pothuri B, Batley T, Gordon C, Mitra T, White H, Howitt B, Matias-Guiu X, Ray-Coquard I, Gaffney D, Small W, Miller A, Concin N, Powell MA, Stuart G, Bookman MA. Clinical research in endometrial cancer: consensus recommendations from the Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup. Lancet Oncol 2024; 25:e420-e431. [PMID: 39214113 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(24)00192-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2024] [Revised: 03/24/2024] [Accepted: 03/28/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024]
Abstract
The Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG) Endometrial Cancer Consensus Conference on Clinical Research (ECCC) was held in Incheon, South Korea, Nov 2-3, 2023. The aims were to develop consensus statements for future trials in endometrial cancer to achieve harmonisation on design elements, select important questions, and identify unmet needs. All 33 GCIG member groups participated in the development, refinement, and finalisation of 18 statements within four topic groups, addressing adjuvant treatment in high-risk disease; treatment for metastatic and recurrent disease; trial designs for rare endometrial cancer subgroups and special circumstances; and specific methodology and adaptation for trials in low-resource settings. In addition, eight areas of unmet need were identified. This was the first GCIG Consensus Conference to include patient advocates and an expert on inclusion, diversity, equity, and access to take part in all aspects of the process and output. Four early-career investigators were also selected for participation, ensuring that they represented different GCIG member groups and regions. Unanimous consensus was obtained for 16 of the 18 statements, with 97% concordance for the remaining two. Using the described methodology from previous Ovarian Cancer Consensus Conferences, this conference did not require even one minority statement. The high acceptance rate following active involvement in the preparation, discussion, and refinement of the statements by all representatives confirmed the consensus progress within a global academic setting, and the expectation that the ECCC will lead to greater harmonisation, actualisation, inclusion, and resolution of unmet needs in clinical research for individuals living with and beyond endometrial cancer worldwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carien L Creutzberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
| | - Jae-Weon Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Gemma Eminowicz
- Department of Clinical Oncology, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - Emma Allanson
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical School, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Lauriane Eberst
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Se Ik Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Remi A Nout
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jeong-Yeol Park
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Domenica Lorusso
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Humanitas San Pio X, Milan, Italy; Humanitas University Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Linda Mileshkin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and University of Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Alison Brand
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital and University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Delia Mezzanzanica
- Department of Experimental Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Amit Oza
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, UHN - Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Val Gebski
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Bhavana Pothuri
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NJ, USA; Diversity and Health Equity for Clinical Trials, GOG-Foundation, Philadelphia, PA USA
| | - Tania Batley
- Ko Ngai Tūhoe te iwi, Kaitauwhiro Mātātahi Mokopuna Ora, Te Pūtahitanga o Te Waipounamu, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Carol Gordon
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group, London, ON, Canada
| | - Tina Mitra
- Kolkata Gynecological Oncology Trials and Translational Research Group (KolGOTrg), New Town, Kolkata, India
| | - Helen White
- Peaches Womb Cancer Trust, Manchester, UK; Cancer Research Advocates Forum, London, UK
| | - Brooke Howitt
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Xavier Matias-Guiu
- Department of Pathology, Hospital U de Bellvitge, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Pathology, Hospital U Arnau de Vilanova, University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain
| | | | - David Gaffney
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - William Small
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stritch School of Medicine, Cardinal Bernadin Cancer Center, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, IL, USA
| | - Austin Miller
- Department of Biostatistics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Nicole Concin
- Department of Gynaecology and Gynaecological Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Matthew A Powell
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Gavin Stuart
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Colombia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nogueira-Rodrigues A, Giannecchini GV, Secord AA. Real world challenges and disparities in the systemic treatment of ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2024; 185:180-185. [PMID: 38442493 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.02.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Revised: 02/14/2024] [Accepted: 02/17/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024]
Abstract
Ovarian cancer (OC) is a global health problem, and the mortality-to-incidence ratio is expected to increase, especially in low- and middle-income countries. These regions face disparities in access to OC care, including lack of awareness, limited access to genetic and tumor testing, paucity of surgical expertise, time to approval of novel therapeutics, and treatment costs. By addressing these inequities, the core aim of this paper is to promote action through collaboration in order to overcome these barriers and promote health equity in OC management and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angélica Nogueira-Rodrigues
- Federal University MG, Brazilian Group of Gynecologic Oncology (EVA), Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG), Oncoclínicas, DOM Oncologia, Brazil.
| | | | - Angeles Alvarez Secord
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kopelman ZA, Tian C, Tumas J, Phippen NT, Tarney CM, Hope ER, Winkler SS, Jokajtys S, Kucera CW, Chan JK, Richardson MT, Kapp DS, Hamilton CA, Leath CA, Jones NL, Rocconi RP, Farley JH, Secord AA, Cosgrove CM, Powell MA, Klopp A, Walker JL, Fleming GF, Bateman NW, Conrads TP, Maxwell GL, Darcy KM. Disease progression, survival, and molecular disparities in Black and White patients with endometrioid endometrial carcinoma in real-world registries and GOG/NRG oncology randomized phase III clinical trials. Gynecol Oncol 2024; 183:103-114. [PMID: 38593674 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.03.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2024] [Revised: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 03/27/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Investigate racial disparities in outcomes and molecular features in Black and White patients with endometrioid endometrial carcinoma (EEC). METHODS Black and White patients diagnosed with EEC who underwent hysterectomy ± adjuvant treatment in SEER, National Cancer Database (NCDB), the Genomics Evidence Neoplasia Information Exchange (GENIE) project (v.13.0), and eight NCI-sponsored randomized phase III clinical trials (RCTs) were studied. Hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated for cancer-related death (CRD), non-cancer death (NCD), and all-cause death. RESULTS Black (n = 4397) vs. White (n = 47,959) patients in SEER had a HR (95% CI) of 2.04 (1.87-2.23) for CRD and 1.22 (1.09-1.36) for NCD. In NCDB, the HR (95% CI) for death in Black (n = 13,468) vs. White (n = 155,706) patients was 1.52 (1.46-1.58) dropping to 1.29 (1.23-1.36) after propensity-score matching for age, comorbidity, income, insurance, grade, stage, LVSI, and treatment. In GENIE, Black (n = 109) vs. White (n = 1780) patients had fewer PTEN, PIK3R1, FBXW7, NF1, mTOR, CCND1, and PI3K-pathway-related gene mutations. In contrast, TP53 and DNA-repair-related gene mutation frequency as well as tumor mutational burden-high status were similar in Black and White patients. In RCTs, Black (n = 187) vs. White (n = 2877) patients were more likely to have advanced or recurrent disease, higher grade, worse performance status and progressive disease. Risk of death in Black vs. White patients in RCTs was 2.19 (1.77-2.71) persisting to 1.32 (1.09-1.61) after matching for grade, stage, and treatment arm while balancing age and performance status. CONCLUSIONS Differences exist in clinical presentation, outcomes, and molecular features in Black vs. White patients with EEC in real-world registries and RCTs. Targeted-drug development, strategies to modify social determinants, and diverse inclusion in RCTs are approaches to reduce disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary A Kopelman
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Chunqiao Tian
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; The Henry M Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Jordyn Tumas
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Neil T Phippen
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Christopher M Tarney
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Erica R Hope
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Stuart S Winkler
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Suzanne Jokajtys
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Calen W Kucera
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - John K Chan
- Palo Alto Medical Foundation, California Pacific Medical Center, Sutter Health, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Michael T Richardson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Daniel S Kapp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Chad A Hamilton
- Gynecologic Oncology Section, Women's Services and The Ochsner Cancer Institute, Ochsner Health, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Charles A Leath
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Nathaniel L Jones
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mitchell Cancer Institute, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA
| | - Rodney P Rocconi
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Cancer Center & Research Institute, the University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA
| | - John H Farley
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Center for Women's Health, Cancer Institute, Dignity Health St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | | - Casey M Cosgrove
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Matthew A Powell
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Ann Klopp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Joan L Walker
- Gynecologic Oncology Division, Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma University Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Gini F Fleming
- Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Nicholas W Bateman
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Center for Women's Health, Cancer Institute, Dignity Health St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA; The Henry M Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Thomas P Conrads
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; The Henry M Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Bethesda, MD, USA; Women's Health Integrated Research Center, Inova Women's Service Line, Inova Health System, Falls Church, VA, USA
| | - G Larry Maxwell
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; The Henry M Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Bethesda, MD, USA; Women's Health Integrated Research Center, Inova Women's Service Line, Inova Health System, Falls Church, VA, USA.
| | - Kathleen M Darcy
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; The Henry M Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Bethesda, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sitler CA, Tian C, Hamilton CA, Richardson MT, Chan JK, Kapp DS, Leath CA, Casablanca Y, Washington C, Chappell NP, Klopp AH, Shriver CD, Tarney CM, Bateman NW, Conrads TP, Maxwell GL, Phippen NT, Darcy KM. Immuno-Molecular Targeted Therapy Use and Survival Benefit in Patients with Stage IVB Cervical Carcinoma in Commission on Cancer ®-Accredited Facilities in the United States. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1071. [PMID: 38473428 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16051071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2024] [Revised: 02/27/2024] [Accepted: 03/03/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate IMT use and survival in real-world stage IVB cervical cancer patients outside randomized clinical trials. METHODS Patients diagnosed with stage IVB cervical cancer during 2013-2019 in the National Cancer Database and treated with chemotherapy (CT) ± external beam radiation (EBRT) ± intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) ± IMT were studied. The adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for risk of death were estimated in patients treated with vs. without IMT after applying propensity score analysis to balance the clinical covariates. RESULTS There were 3164 evaluable patients, including 969 (31%) who were treated with IMT. The use of IMT increased from 11% in 2013 to 46% in 2019. Age, insurance, facility type, sites of distant metastasis, and type of first-line treatment were independently associated with using IMT. In propensity-score-balanced patients, the median survival was 18.6 vs. 13.1 months for with vs. without IMT (p < 0.001). The AHR was 0.72 (95% CI = 0.64-0.80) for adding IMT overall, 0.72 for IMT + CT, 0.66 for IMT + CT + EBRT, and 0.69 for IMT + CT + EBRT + ICBT. IMT-associated survival improvements were suggested in all subgroups by age, race/ethnicity, comorbidity score, facility type, tumor grade, tumor size, and site of metastasis. CONCLUSIONS IMT was associated with a consistent survival benefit in real-world patients with stage IVB cervical cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Collin A Sitler
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD 20889, USA
- Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD 20889, USA
| | - Chunqiao Tian
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD 20889, USA
- Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD 20889, USA
- The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine Inc., Bethesda, MD 20817, USA
| | - Chad A Hamilton
- Gynecologic Oncology Section, Women's Services and The Ochsner Cancer Institute, Ochsner Health, New Orleans, LA 70115, USA
| | - Michael T Richardson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Los Angeles School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA
| | - John K Chan
- Palo Alto Medical Foundation, California Pacific Medical Center, Sutter Health, San Francisco, CA 94010, USA
| | - Daniel S Kapp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Charles A Leath
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, Birmingham, AL 35249, USA
| | - Yovanni Casablanca
- Gynecologic Oncology Division, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC 28204, USA
| | - Christina Washington
- Gynecologic Oncology Division, Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma University Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA
| | - Nicole P Chappell
- Gynecologic Oncology Division, GW Medical Faculty Associates, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20037, USA
| | - Ann H Klopp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Craig D Shriver
- Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD 20889, USA
| | - Christopher M Tarney
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD 20889, USA
- Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD 20889, USA
| | - Nicholas W Bateman
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD 20889, USA
- Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD 20889, USA
- The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine Inc., Bethesda, MD 20817, USA
| | - Thomas P Conrads
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD 20889, USA
- Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD 20889, USA
- Women's Health Integrated Research Center, Women's Service Line, Inova Health System, Falls Church, VA 22042, USA
| | - George Larry Maxwell
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD 20889, USA
- Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD 20889, USA
- Women's Health Integrated Research Center, Women's Service Line, Inova Health System, Falls Church, VA 22042, USA
| | - Neil T Phippen
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD 20889, USA
- Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD 20889, USA
| | - Kathleen M Darcy
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD 20889, USA
- Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD 20889, USA
- The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine Inc., Bethesda, MD 20817, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Allanson E, Hari A, Ndaboine E, Cohen PA, Bristow R. Medicolegal, infrastructural, and financial aspects in gynecologic cancer surgery and their implications in decision making processes: Quo Vadis? Int J Gynecol Cancer 2024; 34:451-458. [PMID: 38438180 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2023-004585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Surgical decision making is complex and involves a combination of analytic, intuitive, and cognitive processes. Medicolegal, infrastructural, and financial factors may influence these processes depending on the context and setting, but to what extent can they influence surgical decision making in gynecologic oncology? This scoping review evaluates existing literature related to medicolegal, infrastructural, and financial aspects of gynecologic cancer surgery and their implications in surgical decision making. Our objective was to summarize the findings and limitations of published research, identify gaps in the literature, and make recommendations for future research to inform policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Allanson
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Anjali Hari
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of California Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | - Edgard Ndaboine
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Catholic University of Health and Allied Sciences, Mwanza, Mwanza, Tanzania
| | - Paul A Cohen
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Robert Bristow
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of California Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Richardson MT, Barry D, Steinberg JR, Thirunavu V, Strom DE, Holder K, Zhang N, Turner BE, Magnani CJ, Weeks BT, Young AMP, Lu CF, Wolgemuth TR, Laasiri N, Squires NA, Anderson JN, Karlan BY, Chan JK, Kapp DS, Roque DR, Salani R. Underrepresentation of racial and ethnic minority groups in gynecologic oncology: An analysis of over 250 trials. Gynecol Oncol 2024; 181:1-7. [PMID: 38096673 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2023] [Revised: 11/29/2023] [Accepted: 12/02/2023] [Indexed: 03/01/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the participation of racial and ethnic minority groups (REMGs) in gynecologic oncology trials. METHODS Gynecologic oncology studies registered on ClinicalTrials.gov between 2007 and 2020 were identified. Trials with published results were analyzed based on reporting of race/ethnicity in relation to disease site and trial characteristics. Expected enrollment by race/ethnicity was calculated and compared to actual enrollment, adjusted for 2010 US Census population data. RESULTS 2146 gynecologic oncology trials were identified. Of published trials (n = 252), 99 (39.3%) reported race/ethnicity data. Recent trials were more likely to report these data (36% from 2007 to 2009; 51% 2013-2015; and 53% from 2016 to 2018, p = 0.01). Of all trials, ovarian cancer trials were least likely to report race/ethnicity data (32.1% vs 39.3%, p = 0.011). Population-adjusted under-enrollment for Blacks was 7-fold in ovarian cancer, Latinx 10-fold for ovarian and 6-fold in uterine cancer trials, Asians 2.5-fold in uterine cancer trials, and American Indian and Alaska Native individuals 6-fold in ovarian trials. Trials for most disease sites have enrolled more REMGs in recent years - REMGs made up 19.6% of trial participants in 2007-2009 compared to 38.1% in 2016-2018 (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION Less than half of trials that published results reported race/ethnicity data. Available data reveals that enrollment of REMGs is significantly below expected rates based on national census data. These disparities persisted even after additionally adjusting for population size. Despite improvement in recent years, additional recruitment of REMGs is needed to achieve more representative and equitable participation in gynecologic cancer clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael T Richardson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Danika Barry
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| | - Jecca R Steinberg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| | - Vineeth Thirunavu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| | - Danielle E Strom
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| | - Kai Holder
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| | - Naixin Zhang
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States of America
| | - Brandon E Turner
- Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Christopher J Magnani
- Division of Urological Surgery, Brigham & Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Brannon T Weeks
- Brigham and Women's Hospital/Massachusetts General Hospital Integrated Residency Program in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Anna Marie P Young
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| | - Connie F Lu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| | - Tierney R Wolgemuth
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| | - Nora Laasiri
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| | - Natalie A Squires
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Jill N Anderson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Beth Y Karlan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - John K Chan
- California Pacific / Palo Alto Medical Foundation / Sutter Research Institute, San Francisco, CA, United States of America
| | - Daniel S Kapp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States of America
| | - Dario R Roque
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| | - Ritu Salani
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lee SS, Dinicu AI, Arthurs L, Shields D, Pothuri B, Lightfoot MDS. Demographic reporting and language exclusion in gynecologic oncology clinical trials. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2024; 230:73.e1-73.e14. [PMID: 37751830 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.09.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2023] [Revised: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 09/20/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Participation in clinical trials may help mitigate disparate cancer outcomes. Thus, ensuring equitable access to clinical trials is a major priority for national cancer organizations. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to examine clinical trial eligibility criteria that may adversely affect the enrollment of underrepresented groups and assess the availability of demographic information in published gynecologic oncology studies. STUDY DESIGN ClinicalTrials.gov was searched for gynecologic oncology studies conducted between 1997 and 2021. Each study's inclusion and exclusion criteria were reviewed to determine whether demographic factors were used for enrollment screening. For published studies, demographic variables that were reported were identified. The expected clinical trial enrollment based on disease incidence and mortality was compared with the observed trial enrollment based on race. RESULTS There were 1597 gynecologic oncology studies: 883 (55%) from ovarian cancer studies, 336 (21%) from cervical cancer studies, 262 (17%) from uterine cancer studies, and 116 (7%) from multisite gynecologic oncology studies. Of the 581 published studies, 554 (95%) reported age, 363 (63%) reported race, and 171 (29%) reported ethnicities. Cervical cancer studies were most likely to report demographic information, including race (P=.026) and ethnicity (P<.001). During the study period, 189 studies (12%) excluded patients based on the language spoken. Industry-sponsored trials (odds ratio, 0.07; 95% confidence interval, 0.02-0.30) and organization-sponsored trials (odds ratio, 0.40; 95% confidence interval, 0.22-0.73) were less likely to exclude patients because of language than investigator-initiated trials. A minority of patients (37%) in cervical cancer trials were of White race, compared with 85% of patients in uterine cancer trials and 82% of patients in ovarian cancer trials. CONCLUSION Over the last 3 decades, 1 in 10 gynecologic oncology trials excluded patients because of language. Race and ethnicity were reported in more than half of the available studies. Initiatives to increase transparency in recruiting underrepresented patients and reporting demographic data are urgently needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah S Lee
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY; Bellevue Hospital, New York, NY
| | - Andreea I Dinicu
- Obstetrics & Gynecology Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | | | | | - Bhavana Pothuri
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY; Bellevue Hospital, New York, NY
| | - Michelle D S Lightfoot
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY; Bellevue Hospital, New York, NY.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Darko N, Millet N, Usman A, Teece L, Moss EL. Exploring the perspectives of underrepresented voices: Perceptions and experiences of uterine cancer for black African, Caribbean, black British, and mixed-black women in the UK to develop strategies for early symptom presentation. Gynecol Oncol 2024; 180:132-138. [PMID: 38091772 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.11.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2023] [Revised: 11/23/2023] [Accepted: 11/26/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The uterine cancer (UC) mortality rate in the UK is significantly higher for women who belong to a Black ethnic group compared to those from other ethnic groups. This study aimed to understand the views and experiences of UC amongst Black ethnic minority women in the UK, with a focus on awareness and presentation of red-flag symptoms. METHODS Women of Black African, Caribbean, Black British and Mixed-Black ethnicity were purposefully recruited to participate in focus groups and individual semi-structured interviews. RESULTS Twenty women from different regions in England participated in the study. Reflexive thematic analysis of the data led to the identification of three main themes: 1) Healthcare inequities; 2) Support and sense making with other Black women; and 3) Knowledge dissemination, mobilisation, and empowerment. Perceptions of inequitable healthcare provision and distrust influenced how participants, and their peer networks, approached seeking assistance from healthcare professionals. Concerns were also raised about culturally insensitive information resources, including issues of language, literacy, and representation, all of which served as potential barriers for women within Black ethnic minority groups. CONCLUSIONS The deficiency of targeted knowledge mobilisation and specific UC information aimed at Black ethnicity women living in the UK, reportedly contributes to the dissemination of misconceptions and an atmosphere of apprehension around a UC diagnosis. The insights from this study highlight the significance of designing culturally sensitive strategies to promote informed decision-making and empower the dissemination of accurate health knowledge amongst Black women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Darko
- College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK.
| | - N Millet
- College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK
| | - A Usman
- College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK
| | - L Teece
- College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK
| | - E L Moss
- College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK; University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Infirmary Square, Leicester, LE1 5WW, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Girda E, Randall LM, Chino F, Monk BJ, Farley JH, O'Cearbhaill RE. Cervical cancer treatment update: A Society of Gynecologic Oncology clinical practice statement. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 179:115-122. [PMID: 37980766 PMCID: PMC11001261 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.10.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2023] [Revised: 10/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/20/2023] [Indexed: 11/21/2023]
Abstract
Cervical cancer is the most commonly diagnosed gynecologic cancer worldwide. Although the incidence has declined with increased screening and higher uptake of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination in high-income countries, this disease remains the second highest cause of cancer mortality among women in low- and middle-income countries. In this clinical practice statement, we describe therapies for cervical cancer by treatment setting, as well as quality of life, financial toxicity, and disparities associated with this disease. In addition to chemotherapy and radiation, therapeutic strategies for cervical cancer include immune checkpoint blockade, antiangiogenics, and antibody-drug conjugates. Optimal treatment for recurrent cervical cancer remains an area of unmet need, necessitating further exploration of rational and innovative treatment approaches, including cell and immune-based therapies. Importantly, development of effective therapies for cervical cancer must incorporate strategies to ensure universal equitable access to HPV vaccination, screening, and treatment. Important consequences of the disease and treatment that impact quality of life must also be addressed. Patients with cervical cancer are at increased risk for financial toxicity, which can lead to downstream detrimental effects on physical, financial, and career outcomes. Underrepresentation of racial and ethnic minorities in gynecologic oncology clinical trials highlights the urgent need for collaborative and focused initiatives to bridge the significant divide and alleviate inequalities in the prevention and treatment of cervical cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eugenia Girda
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States of America
| | - Leslie M Randall
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology and Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University Health, Richmond, VA, United States of America
| | - Fumiko Chino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Bradley J Monk
- Arizona Oncology (US Oncology Network), University of Arizona, Creighton University, Phoenix, AZ, United States of America
| | - John H Farley
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, United States of America
| | - Roisin E O'Cearbhaill
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mandane B, Amirthanayagam A, Patel N, Darko N, Moss EL. Attitudes and barriers to participation in window-of-opportunity trials reported by White and Asian/Asian British ethnicity patients who have undergone treatment for endometrial cancer. Trials 2023; 24:754. [PMID: 38007461 PMCID: PMC10676569 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07572-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2022] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 11/27/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Window-of-opportunity trials (WOT) are a study design that have been used to investigate drug activity in endometrial cancer (EC). Recruitment to cancer clinical trials by patients from ethnic minority groups is reported to be lower than for patients of White ethnicity. METHODS A verbal questionnaire was conducted with White and Asian/Asian British ethnicity patients who had undergone treatment for EC. Strategic purposeful sampling was used to recruit patients from diverse social/educational backgrounds. Questions explored: background knowledge of clinical research, WOT study design, and views on medications that might be investigated. Thematic analysis was used to explore motivations for WOT participation and perceived barriers. RESULTS In total, 21 patients were recruited to the study (15 White and 6 Asian/Asian British). Views on optimum time to receive trial information differed, preferences ranging from 'at the time of diagnosis' to 'a few days after diagnosis'. The choice of medication under investigation had a strong influence on potential willingness to participate, with greater interest reported in medications derived from vitamins or food supplements rather than hormone-based drugs. Potential barriers to participation included concern over potential side-effects and the emotional/physical burden of a cancer diagnosis prior to major surgery. DISCUSSION This study provides important insights into patients' views on WOT participation in EC and raises issues that need to be considered for future trial design and participant recruitment materials. The timing and format of study information and type of substance under investigation were factors influencing potential participation. Future studies should consider using multi-lingual visual information videos to address information needs, as this may encourage participation by ethnic minority patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Mandane
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK
- University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Infirmary Square, Leicester, LE1 5WW, UK
| | - A Amirthanayagam
- College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK
| | - N Patel
- University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Infirmary Square, Leicester, LE1 5WW, UK
| | - N Darko
- College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK
| | - E L Moss
- University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Infirmary Square, Leicester, LE1 5WW, UK.
- College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
O'Cearbhaill RE, Miller A, Soslow RA, Lankes HA, DeLair D, Segura S, Chavan S, Zamarin D, DeBernardo R, Moore K, Moroney J, Shahin M, Thaker PH, Wahner-Hendrickson AE, Aghajanian C. A phase 2 study of dasatinib in recurrent clear cell carcinoma of the ovary, fallopian tube, peritoneum or endometrium: NRG oncology/gynecologic oncology group study 0283. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 176:16-24. [PMID: 37418832 PMCID: PMC10529107 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.06.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2023] [Revised: 06/22/2023] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Gynecologic cancers are traditionally managed according to their presumed site of origin, without regard to the underlying histologic subtype. Clear cell histology is associated with chemotherapy refractoriness and poor survival. Mutations in SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex member ARID1A, which encodes for BAF250a protein, are common in clear cell and endometriosis-associated endometrioid carcinomas. High-throughput cell-based drug screening predicted activity of dasatinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in ARID1A-mutant clear cell carcinoma. METHODS We conducted a phase 2 clinical trial of dasatinib 140 mg once daily by mouth in patients with recurrent or persistent ovarian and endometrial clear cell carcinoma. Patients with measurable disease were enrolled and then assigned to biomarker-defined populations based on BAF250a immunohistochemistry. The translational endpoints included broad next-generation sequencing to assess concordance of protein expression and treatment outcomes. RESULTS Twenty-eight patients, 15 of whom had tumors with retained BAF250a and 13 with loss of BAF250a were evaluable for treatment response and safety. The most common grade 3 adverse events were anemia, fatigue, dyspnea, hyponatremia, pleural effusion, and vomiting. One patient had a partial response, eight (28%) had stable disease, and 15 (53.6%) had disease progression. Twenty-three patients had next-generation sequencing results; 13 had a pathogenic ARID1A alteration. PIK3CA mutations were more prevalent in ARID1A-mutant tumors, while TP53 mutations were more prevalent in ARID1A wild-type tumors. CONCLUSIONS Dasatinib was not an effective single-agent treatment for recurrent or persistent ovarian and endometrial clear cell carcinoma. Studies are urgently needed for this rare gynecologic subtype.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Austin Miller
- Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, United States of America.
| | - Robert A Soslow
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America.
| | - Heather A Lankes
- NRG Oncology, Operations Center-Philadelphia East, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States of America.
| | - Deborah DeLair
- Northwell Health, Greenvale, New York, NY, United States of America.
| | - Sheila Segura
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States of America.
| | - Shweta Chavan
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America.
| | - Dmitriy Zamarin
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America.
| | | | - Kathleen Moore
- University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK, United States of America.
| | - John Moroney
- University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America.
| | - Mark Shahin
- Abington Memorial Hospital, Willow Grove, PA, United States of America.
| | - Premal H Thaker
- Washington University, St. Louis, MO, United States of America.
| | | | - Carol Aghajanian
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|