Gonadal hormones in female rats protect against dehydration-induced memory impairments in the novel object recognition paradigm

The estrogenic reduction in water intake stimulated by dehydration involves estrogen receptor alpha and a potential role for GLP-1

It is well documented that estrogens inhibit fluid intake. Most of this research, however, has focused on fluid intake in response to dipsogenic hormone and/or drug treatments in euhydrated rats. Additional research is needed to fully characterize the fluid intake effects of estradiol in response to true hypovolemia. As such, the goals of this series of experiments were to provide a detailed analysis of water intake in response to water deprivation in ovariectomized female rats treated with estradiol. In addition, these experiments also tested if activation of estrogen receptor alpha is sufficient to reduce water intake stimulated by water deprivation and tested for a role of glucagon like peptide-1 in the estrogenic control of water intake. As expected, estradiol reduced water intake in response to 24 and 48 h of water deprivation. The reduction in water intake was associated with a reduction in drinking burst number, with no change in drinking burst size. Pharmacological activation of estrogen receptor alpha reduced intake. Finally, estradiol-treatment caused a leftward shift in the behavioral dose response curve of exendin-4, the glucagon like peptide-1 agonist. While the highest dose of exendin-4 reduced 10 min intake in both oil and estradiol-treated rats, the intermediate dose only reduced intake in rats treated with estradiol. Together, this series of experiments extends previous research by providing a more thorough behavioral analysis of the anti-dipsogenic effect of estradiol in dehydrated rats, in addition to identifying the glucagon like peptide-1 system as a potential bioregulator involved in the underlying mechanisms by which estradiol reduces water intake in the female rat.

Limited effects of dehydration on object discrimination in the novel object recognition paradigm in young and middle-aged male and female rats

Dehydration is associated with impaired cognitive function in humans. Limited animal research also suggests that disruptions in fluid homeostasis impair performance in cognitive tasks. We previously demonstrated that extracellular dehydration impaired performance in the novel object recognition memory test in a sex and gonadal hormone specific manner. The experiments in this report were designed to further characterize the behavioral effects of dehydration on cognitive function in male and female rats. In Experiment 1, we tested whether dehydration during the training trial in the novel object recognition paradigm would impact performance, while euhydrated, in the test trial. Regardless of hydration status during training, all groups spent more time investigating the novel object during the test trial. In Experiment 2, we tested whether aging exacerbated dehydration-induced impairments on test trial performance. Although aged animals spent less time investigating the objects and had reduced activity levels, all groups spent more time investigating the novel object, compared to the original object, during the test trial. Aged animals also had reduced water intake after water deprivation and, unlike the young adult rats, there was no sex difference in water intake. Together these results, in combination with our previous findings, suggest that disruptions in fluid homeostasis have limited effects on performance in the novel object recognition test and may only impact performance after specific types of fluid manipulations.

Sex Differences in Salt Appetite: Perspectives from Animal Models and Human Studies

Salt ingestion by animals and humans has been noted from prehistory. The search for salt is largely driven by a physiological need for sodium. There is a large body of literature on sodium intake in laboratory rats, but the vast majority of this work has used male rats. The limited work conducted in both male and female rats, however, reveals sex differences in sodium intake. Importantly, while humans ingest salt every day, with every meal and with many foods, we do not know how many of these findings from rodent studies can be generalized to men and women. This review provides a synthesis of the literature that examines sex differences in sodium intake and highlights open questions. Sodium serves many important physiological functions and is inextricably linked to the maintenance of body fluid homeostasis. Indeed, from a motivated behavior perspective, the drive to consume sodium has largely been studied in conjunction with the study of thirst. This review will describe the neuroendocrine controls of fluid balance, mechanisms underlying sex differences, sex differences in sodium intake, changes in sodium intake during pregnancy, and the possible neuronal mechanisms underlying these differences in behavior. Having reviewed the mechanisms that can only be studied in animal experiments, we address sex differences in human dietary sodium intake in reproduction, and with age.

Object recognition tasks in rats: Does sex matter?

Novelty recognition tasks based on object exploration are frequently used for the evaluation of cognitive abilities and investigation of neurobiological and molecular aspects of memory in rodents. This is an interesting approach because variations of the object recognition tasks focus on different aspects of the memory events such as novelty, location, context, and combinations of these elements. Nevertheless, as in most animal neuroscience research, female subjects are underrepresented in object recognition studies. When studies include females, the particularities of this sex are not always considered. For example, appropriate controls for manipulations conducted exclusively in females (such as estrous cycle verification) are not included. In addition, interpretation of data is often based on standardizations conducted with male subjects. Despite that, females are frequently reported as deficient and unable to adequately perform some memory tests. Thus, our study aims to review studies that describe similarities and differences between male and female performances in the different variations of object recognition tasks. In summary, although females are commonly described with deficits and the articles emphasize sex differences, most published data reveal similar performances when sexes are compared.

Sex differences in the acute ethanol effects on object recognition memory: influence of estrous cycle

Effects of acute ethanol (EtOH) on memory depend on several factors, including type of behavioral task. Sex differences in EtOH effects have been reported in humans and animals, and recognition memory can be influenced by circulating sex hormones. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of sex and estrous cycle in the acute effects of EtOH on novel object recognition memory in rats. Male and female Wistar rats were part of one of the groups: control, 0.6-g/kg EtOH and 1.8-g/kg EtOH (administered intraperitoneally before the training session). The estrous cycle was evaluated by vaginal smear. The task was conducted in an open field arena. During training, animals were exposed to two identical objects, and test sessions were performed 1 h (short-term) and 24 h (long-term) later. One of the objects was changed in each test. Increased novel object exploration was shown by male and female controls in the short- and long-term tests, respectively. In the short-term test, females did not show preference for the novel object, and EtOH 1.8 g/kg impaired performance in males. In the long-term test, both sexes showed object discrimination, and 1.8-g/kg EtOH reduced preference for the new object in male rats. The phase of the cycle, the performance on proestrus was worse compared with other phases, and EtOH failed to impair performance mainly on estrous. In conclusion, while male rats displayed ethanol-induced recognition memory deficit, female rats were unaffected by EtOH impairing effects. In addition, the performance of female rats was influenced by the estrous cycle phases.

Fluid intake, what's dopamine got to do with it?

Maintaining fluid balance is critical for life. The central components that control fluid intake are only partly understood. This contribution to the collection of papers highlighting work by members of the Society for the Study of Ingestive Behavior focuses on the role that dopamine has on fluid intake and describes the roles that various bioregulators can have on thirst and sodium appetite by influencing dopamine systems in the brain. The goal of the review is to highlight areas in need of more research and to propose a framework to guide that research. We hope that this framework will inspire researchers in the field to investigate these interesting questions in order to form a more complete understanding of how fluid intake is controlled.

Bidirectional effects of estradiol on the control of water intake in female rats

The inhibitory effect of estradiol (E2) on water intake has been recognized for 50 years. Despite a rich literature describing this phenomenon, we report here a previously unidentified dipsogenic effect of E2 during states of low fluid intake. Our initial goal was to test the hypothesis that the anti-dipsogenic effect of E2 on unstimulated water intake is independent of its anorexigenic effect in female rats. In support of this hypothesis, water intake was reduced during estrus, compared to diestrus, when food was present or absent. Water intake was reduced by E2 in ovariectomized rats when food was available, demonstrating a causative role of E2. Surprisingly, however, when food was removed, resulting in a significant reduction in baseline water intake, E2 enhanced drinking. Accordingly, we next tested the effect of E2 on water intake after an acute suppression of intake induced by exendin-4. The initial rebound drinking was greater in E2-treated, compared to Oil-treated, rats. Finally, to reconcile conflicting reports regarding the effect of ovariectomy on water intake, we measured daily water and food intake, and body weight in ovariectomized and sham-operated rats. Predictably, ovariectomy significantly increased food intake and body weight, but only transiently increased water intake. Together these results provide further support for independent effects of E2 on the controls of water and food intake. More importantly, this report of bidirectional effects of E2 on water intake may lead to a paradigm shift, as it challenges the prevailing view that E2 effects on fluid intake are exclusively inhibitory.

How predictive is body weight on fluid intake in rats? It depends on sex

The assumption that body weight is a predictor of fluid intake is often used as rationale for normalizing intake to body weight when examining sex differences in drinking behavior. Nonuniform application of this body weight correction likely contributes to discrepancies in the literature. We, however, previously demonstrated sex differences in the relationship between body weight and angiotensin II (AngII)-stimulated water intake. Only after a pharmacological dose of AngII did water intake correlate with body weight, and only in males. Here we investigated whether body weight correlated with fluid intake stimulated by additional dipsogenic agents in male and female rats. We found that intake stimulated by either water deprivation or furosemide correlated with body weight in male rats. We found no relationship between intake and body weight after water deprivation, furosemide treatment, or isoproterenol treatment in females, nor did we find a relationship between intake and body weight after hypertonic saline treatment in either males or females. Finally, we report that daily water intake correlated with body weight in females. This effect, however, is likely the result of a relationship between body weight and food intake because when food was absent or reduced, the correlation between body weight and intake disappeared. These results demonstrate that multiple factors need to be considered when determining the best way to compare fluid intake between males and females and provides insight to help explain the discrepancies in the literature regarding sex differences in fluid intake.