1
|
Zaidi M, Sarkar S, Arakelyan S, Poghosyan H. Relationship Between Fatalistic Cancer Beliefs and Risky Health Behaviors. West J Nurs Res 2024; 46:757-765. [PMID: 39161288 DOI: 10.1177/01939459241273388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/21/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is limited research on how fatalism influences risky health behaviors that are linked to higher cancer risks. This study investigates the relationship between risky health behaviors (tobacco smoking, electronic cigarette use, and heavy alcohol drinking) and fatalistic cancer beliefs while controlling for health care-related self-efficacy and sociodemographic and clinical factors among adults without a history of cancer. METHODS We used cross-sectional data from the 2020 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) 5 Cycle 4. The study sample included noninstitutionalized adults (aged ≥18 years without a self-reported cancer history (n = 2464). The outcome variable was risky health behaviors comprised of tobacco smoking, electronic cigarette use, and heavy alcohol drinking. We combined these 3 risky behaviors into a binary variable (0, not having risky health behavior; 1, having ≥1 risky health behavior). The key independent variable was cancer fatalistic beliefs. We used descriptive statistics and multivariate logistic regression analyses. RESULTS Overall, 50% of the sample were women, 64.7% of participants self-identified as non-Hispanic White, 16.4% as Hispanic, and 10.6% as non-Hispanic Black. About 43% of participants reported having at least one risky health behavior. While holding all other factors constant, each unit increase in cancer fatalism score was associated with 30.0% higher odds of increased risky health behaviors (odds ratio = 1.30, 95% confidence interval 1.04-1.62, P = .021) among adults without a history of cancer. CONCLUSION By understanding the relationship between cancer-related fatalistic beliefs and risky health behaviors, cancer prevention outreach programs can be personalized to suit the unique needs of specific individuals and communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maryum Zaidi
- Solomont School of Nursing, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA, USA
| | | | - Stella Arakelyan
- Advance Care Reseach Centre, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kaya A, Tuzcu A. A Bibliometric Analysis of the 36-Year History of Cancer Nursing (1987-2023). Cancer Nurs 2024; 47:252-260. [PMID: 38335453 DOI: 10.1097/ncc.0000000000001324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bibliometric analysis is an effective method for evaluating the publication characteristics and development of a journal. To our knowledge, this study is the first such analysis of the publications in Cancer Nursing . OBJECTIVE This study aimed to analyze the publication characteristics and evolution of Cancer Nursing over a period of 36 years since its inception. METHODS Bibliometric analysis was carried out on 3095 publications. Data were collected from the Web of Science Core Collection database on September 15, 2023. Data analysis was conducted with Web of Science Core Collection, VOSviewer, and Bibliometrix package in R software. RESULTS The results showed a steady increase in the citation and publication structure of Cancer Nursing . "Quality of life" was at the center of the studies, and "quality of life," "women," and "breast cancer" were identified as trend topics. The United States was both at the center of the cooperation network and was the country that contributed the most publications to the journal. CONCLUSION Cancer Nursing has had an increasing contribution to and impact on cancer nursing in terms of the quality and citations of published articles. It was noted that the journal's network of collaboration has expanded globally and that its thematic diversity is high. Although quality of life, women, and breast cancer have been reported extensively, more studies addressing the concepts of "children," "support," and "needs" are needed in the journal. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE This study not only enriches global readers in the field of cancer nursing but may also be beneficial in providing input to guide future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayla Kaya
- Author Affiliations: Department of Pediatric Nursing (Dr Kaya) and Department of Public Health Nursing (Dr Tuzcu), Faculty of Nursing, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Xiong L, Liu FC. Immune function status of postoperative patients with colon cancer for predicting liver metastasis. World J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 16:463-470. [PMID: 38463357 PMCID: PMC10921213 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i2.463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Revised: 01/04/2024] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colon cancer (CC) has a high incidence rate. Radical resection is the main treatment method for CC; however, liver metastasis (LM) often occurs post-surgery. The liver contains both innate and adaptive immune cells that monitor and remove abnormal cells and pathogens. Before LM, tumor cells secrete cytokines and exosomes to adjust the immune microenvironment of the liver, thus forming an inhibitory immune microenvironment for colonization by circulating tumor cells. This indicates that the immune state of patients with CC plays a crucial role in the occurrence and progression of LM. AIM To observe and analyze the relationship between immune status and expression of tumor factors in patients with LM of CC, and to provide a scientific intervention method for promoting the patient prognosis. METHODS A retrospective analysis was performed. The baseline data of 100 patients with CC and 100 patients with CC who suffered from postoperative LM and were admitted to our hospital from May 2021 to May 2023 were included in the non-occurrence and occurrence groups, respectively. The immune status of the patients and the expression of tumor factor-related indicators in the two groups were compared, and the predictive value of the indicators for postoperative LM in patients with CC was analyzed. RESULTS Compared with the non-occurrence group, the expression of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), CA19-9, CA242, CA72-4 and CA50 in patients in the occurrence group were significantly higher, while the expression of CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, natural killer (NK) and CD4+/CD25 in patients in the occurrence group were significantly lower (P < 0.05). No significant difference was observed in other baseline data between groups (P > 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression model analysis revealed that the expressions of CEA, CA19-9, CA242, CA72-4, CA50, CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, NK, and CD4+/CD25 were associated with the LM in patients with CC. High expressions of serum CEA, CA19-9, CA242, CA72-4 and CA50, and low expressions of CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, NK, and CD4+/CD25 in patients with CC were risk factors for LM (OR > 1, P < 0.05). The receiver operating characteristic curve showed that the area under curve for CEA, CA19-9, CA242, CA72-4, CA50, CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, NK, and CD4+/CD25 in the prediction of LM in patients with CC were all > 0.80, with a high predictive value. CONCLUSION The expression of tumor factors and immune state-related indices in patients with CC is closely associated with the occurrence of LM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Le Xiong
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Xiangyang No. 1 People’s Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Xiangyang 441000, Hubei Province, China
| | - Fang-Chen Liu
- Department of Blood Transfusion, Xiangyang No. 1 People’s Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Xiangyang 441000, Hubei Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Aruma JF, Hearn M, Bernacchi V, Moss JL. Examining the roles of travel distance, medical mistrust, and cancer fatalism in the uptake of clinical cancer prevention among women in rural and urban US communities: A secondary data analysis. Prev Med Rep 2024; 38:102611. [PMID: 38375162 PMCID: PMC10874844 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2023] [Revised: 01/04/2024] [Accepted: 01/12/2024] [Indexed: 02/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Rural adults are less likely to receive cancer screening than urban adults, likely due to systematic differences in community- and individual-level factors. The purpose of this study was to analyze the relative contributions of rurality, travel time, medical mistrust, and cancer fatalism in explaining uptake of clinical cancer prevention services. Methods We conducted a secondary data analysis of 2019-2020 survey data from women, ages 45-65, in rural and urban counties in central Pennsylvania, examining rurality, travel time to a primary care provider, medical mistrust, and cancer fatalism, as well as uptake of guideline-recommended colorectal cancer screening, cervical cancer screening, and preventive check-up. Final models used multivariable logistic regression to assess the relationships among study variables, controlling for participant demographics. Results Among 474 participants, 48.9 % resided in rural counties. Most participants had received clinical cancer prevention services (colorectal cancer screening: 55.4 %; cervical cancer screening: 82.8 %; preventive check-up in the last year: 75.4 %). Uptake of services was less common among participants with higher medical mistrust (colorectal cancer screening: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.87, 95 % confidence interval [CI] = 0.76-1.00; cervical cancer screening: aOR = 0.79, 95 % CI = 0.63-1.00; last-year check-up: aOR = 0.74, 95 % CI = 0.63-0.88). Conclusions Patient attitudes, particularly medical mistrust, may contribute to rural/urban disparities in clinical cancer prevention among women. Community- and individual-level interventions are needed to improve cancer outcomes in rural areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane-Frances Aruma
- Penn State College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, USA
| | - Madison Hearn
- Penn State College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Veronica Bernacchi
- Penn State College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Jennifer L. Moss
- Penn State College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Clarke N, Hayes L, McQueen A, Gallagher P, Kearney PM, McNamara D, O'Morain CA, von Wagner C, Mooney T, Sharp L. The role of defensive information processing in population-based colorectal cancer screening uptake. Cancer 2023; 129:1253-1260. [PMID: 36740959 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34603] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2022] [Revised: 08/23/2022] [Accepted: 08/25/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Internationally, colorectal cancer screening participation remains low despite the availability of home-based testing and numerous interventions to increase uptake. To be effective, interventions should be based on an understanding of what influences individuals' decisions about screening participation. This study investigates the association of defensive information processing (DIP) with fecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based colorectal cancer screening uptake. METHODS Regression modeling of data from a cross-sectional survey within a population-based FIT screening program was conducted. The survey included the seven subdomains of the McQueen DIP measure. The primary outcome variable was the uptake status (screening user or nonuser). Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) for screening nonuse by DIP (sub)domain score, with adjustments made for sociodemographic and behavioral factors associated with uptake. RESULTS Higher scores (equating to greater defensiveness) on all DIP domains were significantly associated with lower uptake in the model adjusted for sociodemographic factors. In the model with additional adjustments for behavioral factors, the suppression subdomains of "deny immediacy to be tested" (OR, 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.43-0.65; p < .001) and "self-exemption" (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.68-0.96; p < .001) independently predicted nonuse of FIT-based screening. CONCLUSIONS This is the first study outside the United States that has identified DIP as a barrier to colorectal cancer screening uptake, and it is the first focused specifically on FIT-based screening. The findings suggest that two suppression barriers, namely denying the immediacy to be tested and self-exempting oneself from screening, may be promising targets for future interventions to improve uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Clarke
- School of Psychology, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Louise Hayes
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Amy McQueen
- Health Communication Research Laboratory, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
- Division of General Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | | | | | - Deirdre McNamara
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Adelaide and Meath Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Colm A O'Morain
- Faculty of Health Science, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Christian von Wagner
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Linda Sharp
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Self-Reported Reasons for Inconsistent Participation in Colorectal Cancer Screening Using FIT in Flanders, Belgium. GASTROINTESTINAL DISORDERS 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/gidisord5010001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: In Flanders, the uptake in the population-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program (using fecal immunochemical test, FIT) is suboptimal (~50%). This study explored the reasons for inconsistent participation in FIT screening among irregular participants in Flanders. Methods: An online survey with both open questions and fixed statements was sent to irregular participants (2016–2018) in the Flemish CRC screening program. A reminder email followed eight weeks after the first email. Data analysis used both qualitative and quantitative approaches. Post-stratification weights based on gender, age group, and the first two digits of the postcode were employed to reduce non-response bias. Results: In total, 5328 out of 19,592 irregular participants responded to the survey. While the main reasons not to participate were related to ‘postponing participation’ and ‘having other priorities’, the main reasons to participate were related to the importance of (preventive) health checks. The role of general practitioners (GPs) in promoting CRC screening also emerged as an important theme among the respondents’ answers (based on fixed statements). Conclusions: The study reported the main reasons for inconsistent participation in FIT screening for CRC in Flanders. The findings are helpful in guiding tailored interventions to increase FIT screening uptake in the region.
Collapse
|
7
|
Swait J, de Bekker-Grob EW. A discrete choice model implementing gist-based categorization of alternatives, with applications to patient preferences for cancer screening and treatment. JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS 2022; 85:102674. [PMID: 36041269 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2022.102674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2021] [Revised: 03/28/2022] [Accepted: 08/16/2022] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
The rational microeconomic decision model is hard-coded into usual econometric specifications such as the Multinomial Logit and Probit models, inter alia. There is a very tight link between utility maximization and the apparatus of welfare theory that underlies economic policy analysis, which creates a tension around the possibility of representing other decision rules. We propose a less restrictive model of choice, built on the concept of gist-based categorization judgments that are assumed to precede (thus, condition) the maximization-driven selection process in decision making. This categorization facilitates decision making by allowing adoption of certain simpler decision rules under appropriate conditions, the drivers of which are endogenously determined. We demonstrate that the proposed model provides better fit than traditional choice models, using cancer screening and treatment choice data from two discrete choice experiments. In addition, we show that the model provides a deeper, more nuanced and insightful perspective on (healthcare) decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Swait
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management and Erasmus Choice Modeling Centre, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, Rotterdam 3000 DR, the Netherlands.
| | - E W de Bekker-Grob
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management and Erasmus Choice Modeling Centre, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, Rotterdam 3000 DR, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Syed Soffian SS, Safian N, Nawi AM, Ahmad SB, Chan HK, Abu Hassan MR. Rate and associated factors of refusal to perform immunochemical Faecal Occult Blood Test (iFOBT) among semi-urban communities. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0258129. [PMID: 34618854 PMCID: PMC8496834 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2021] [Accepted: 09/19/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The uptake of the immunochemical faecal occult blood test (iFOBT) in many countries with an opportunistic colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programme remains suboptimal. This study aimed to determine the rate, associated factors and reasons of refusal to perform the iFOBT test offered under an opportunistic CRC screening programme in semi-urban communities. This cross-sectional study was conducted among the average-risk individuals living in semi-urban areas, who sought care from public primary care centres across Kedah state, Malaysia. The information regarding the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of individuals who were offered the iFOBT between January and April 2019, along with their willingness to perform the test, was gathered. The factors associated with the refusal were further explored using the logistic regression analysis. The individuals offered the iFOBT (n = 920) were mainly female (52.4%) and had a mean age of 58.7±10.6 years. The refusal rate of the iFOBT was 32.2%. Patients who did not have hypertension (adjusted OR: 3.33; 95% CI: 2.44, 4.54), did not have CRC symptoms (adjusted OR: 3.15; 95% CI:1.26, 7.89), had the test offered by either medical assistants (adjusted OR: 2.44; 95% CI: 1.71, 3.49) or nurses (adjusted OR: 2.41; 95% CI 1.65, 3.51), did not have diabetes (adjusted OR: 1.99; 95% CI: 1.42, 2.77),and were not active smokers (adjusted OR: 1.74; 95% CI: 1.22, 2.47), were more likely to refuse the iFOBT. The common reasons of refusing the test included "feeling not ready for the test" (21.6%) and "feeling healthy" (14.9%). The iFOBT was refused by one-third of the average-risk individuals from semi-urban communities. The associated factors and reasons of refusal found in this study could guide policymakers in developing targeted interventions to boost the uptake of CRC screening in Malaysia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nazarudin Safian
- Department of Community Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Azmawati Mohammed Nawi
- Department of Community Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | | | - Huan-Keat Chan
- Clinical Research Center, Sultanah Bahiyah Hospital, Kedah, Malaysia
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cohen M, Rosenfeld M, Greenblatt-Kimron L. Associations Between Cancer Fatalism, Causal Attributions, and Perceptions of Benefits and Barriers to Screening for Colorectal Cancer. Int J Behav Med 2021; 29:357-366. [PMID: 34523072 DOI: 10.1007/s12529-021-10023-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/02/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of the study was to assess the associations between cancer causal attributions (divine providence, chance or luck, environmental or genetic factors, weak personal resilience), cancer fatalistic beliefs (cancer occurrence and outcome beliefs), and benefits of and barriers to screening for early detection of colorectal cancer. METHODS It was a cross-sectional study of 252 individuals (46% men and 54% women) aged 50-75. Participants completed measures of cancer causal attributions, Powe's cancer fatalism questionnaire, and the benefits and barriers to colorectal cancer screening subscales of the health belief model. The study model was assessed using path analysis and mediation tests. RESULTS Participants expressed moderate levels of occurrence and outcome of fatalistic beliefs, moderate levels of causal attributions, a high level of perception of the benefits of screening, and a moderate level of barriers to screening. The path model showed good fit measures (χ2 = 17.38, df = 14, p = .24; χ2/df = 1.24; NFI = .98; TLI = .99; CFI = .99; RMSEA = .03, 90% CI = .01, .07). Outcome fatalism mediated the relationship between each causal attribution and perceived barriers, whereas occurrence fatalism mediated only the relationship between the causal attribution of divine providence and the perceived benefits of screening. CONCLUSIONS The results add to our understanding of the effects of causal attributions and fatalistic beliefs on perceptions of benefits and barriers to screening; hence, these factors should be the focus of change to reduce barriers to screening for early detection of cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miri Cohen
- School of Social Work, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Harper DM, Tariq M, Alhawli A, Syed N, Patel M, Resnicow K. Cancer risk perception and physician communication behaviors on cervical cancer and colorectal cancer screening. eLife 2021; 10:e70003. [PMID: 34427182 PMCID: PMC8384416 DOI: 10.7554/elife.70003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2021] [Accepted: 07/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Women 50-65 years of age have the lowest cervical and colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates among ages recommended for screening. The primary aim of this work is to determine how cancer risk perceptions and provider communication behaviors, in addition to known demographic factors, influence the uptake of both cervical and CRC screening or a single screen among women in southeast Michigan. Methods Fourteen health services and communication behavior questions were adapted from the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) and administered to a multiethnic sample of adults in southeast Michigan. The outcome variable was self-reported up-to-date cervical cancer and/or CRC screening as defined by the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF). Demographic and cancer risk/communication behavior responses of the four screening populations (both tests, one test, no tests) were analyzed with multinomial regression for all comparisons. Results Of the 394 respondents, 54% were up to date for both cervical and CRC screening, 21% were up to date with only cervical cancer screening and 12% were up to date for only CRC screening. Of the 14 risk perception and communication behavior questions, only 'Did your primary care physician (PCP) involve you in the decisions about your health care as much as you wanted?' was significantly associated with women having both screens compared to only cervical cancer screening (aOR 1.67; 95% CI: 1.08, 2.57). The multivariate model showed age, and Middle East and North African (MENA) ethnicity and Black race, in addition to PCP-patient dyad decision-making to be associated with the cancer screenings women completed. Conclusions Optimizing PCP-patient decision-making in health care may increase opportunities for both cervical cancer and CRC screening either in the office or by self-sampling. Understanding the effects of age and the different interventional strategies needed for MENA women compared to Black women will inform future intervention trials aimed to increase both cancer screenings. Funding This work was supported by NIH through the Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research UL1TR002240 and by NCI through The University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center P30CA046592-29-S4 grants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diane M Harper
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan School of MedicineAnn ArborUnited States
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Michigan School of MedicineAnn ArborUnited States
- Department of Women’s Studies, University of Michigan, College of Literature, Science and the ArtsAnn ArborUnited States
| | - Madiha Tariq
- Arab Community Center for Economic and Social Services (ACCESS)DearbornUnited States
| | - Asraa Alhawli
- Arab Community Center for Economic and Social Services (ACCESS)DearbornUnited States
| | - Nadia Syed
- Arab Community Center for Economic and Social Services (ACCESS)DearbornUnited States
| | - Minal Patel
- Department of Health Behavior & Health Education, University of Michigan School of PublicAnn ArborUnited States
- Outreach and Health Disparities Research, University of Michigan Rogel Cancer CenterAnn ArborUnited States
| | - Ken Resnicow
- Outreach and Health Disparities Research, University of Michigan Rogel Cancer CenterAnn ArborUnited States
- Center for Health Communications Research, University of Michigan, School of Public HealthAnn ArborUnited States
| |
Collapse
|