Comparative assessment of immune complex-mediated hypersensitivity reactions with biotherapeutics in the non-human primate: Critical parameters, safety and lessons for future studies

Immune-Mediated Liver Effects Associated With Administration of a Human Anti-IL-21 Receptor Antibody (ATR-107) in Rats

The toxicity of ATR-107, a human anti-interleukin-21 receptor (IL-21R) monoclonal antibody (mAb), was evaluated in CD-1 mice and cynomolgus monkeys after single-dose intravenous (IV) administration, and in Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats and cynomolgus monkeys after weekly IV and subcutaneous (SC) administration in 13-week toxicity studies that included recovery. Adverse liver necrosis, diffuse bridging fibrosis, and higher liver enzymes occurred in rats in the low-dose IV group (10 mg/kg), but not at 50 or 250 mg/kg IV, and not following SC administration despite overlapping systemic ATR-107 exposures. Similar findings were not seen in mice or cynomolgus monkeys. A series of investigative rat toxicity studies showed liver findings only occurred after administration of at least 3 weekly doses, only occurred in rats that developed anti-drug antibodies (ADAs), and the incidence was associated with higher ADAs titers. However, the presence of ADAs did not always result in liver injury. Liver findings did not occur in nude rats, which had high ATR-107 exposures and no ADAs. These findings suggest an adaptive immune response with formation of ADAs was necessary for development of ATR-107-related liver findings, and that liver injury can occur in rats secondary to development of ADAs following repeated administration of a human therapeutic mAb.

The science and practice of current environmental risk assessment for gene therapy: a review

Gene therapy is a fast-growing field showing great potential to treat genetic diseases and cancer. With accelerating gene therapy development and approval, their environment risk assessment (ERA) becomes increasingly important. An ERA is an assessment of the risks to human health and the environment upon exposure to a medicinal product as the result of its release during clinical development or after entering the market. Because ERA is an important component of regulatory submission, drug developers must perform a robust assessment to ensure the safety of unintended persons, animal, plants, microorganisms and environment at large. Global regulations on gene therapy ERA continue to evolve. Gene therapy ERAs are carried out according to general principles as provided in regulatory guidelines for application of clinical trials and marketing authorizations. The current review intends to summarize regulations and content requirements on gene therapy ERA in European Union, the USA and Japan. The approved gene therapy products by EMA and US Food and Drug Administration are analyzed for the critical aspects of their ERAs to provide the current status and practice of gene therapy ERAs by drug developers. For this purpose, the main contents of these gene therapy ERAs are summarized. Critical safety factors of gene therapy ERAs are described. With more experience and knowledge to be accumulated, gene therapy ERAs are expected to be less challenging with commonly used viral vectors.

Visible particles in parenteral drug products: A review of current safety assessment practice

Parenteral drug products (PDPs) are administered extensively to treat various diseases. Product quality plays a critical role in ensuring patient safety and product efficacy. One important quality challenge is the contamination of particles in PDPs. Particle presence in PDPs represents potential safety risk to patients. Differential guidance and practice have been in place for visible (VPs) and subvisible particles (SVPs) in PDPs. For SVPs, the amount limits have been harmonized in multiple Pharmacopeias. The pharmaceutical industry follows the guided limits for regulatory and quality compliance. However, for VPs, no such acceptable limit has been set. This results in not only quality but also safety challenges for manufacturers and drug developers in managing and evaluating VPs. It is important to understand the potential safety risk of VPs so these can be weighed against the benefit of the PDPs. To evaluate their potential risk(s), it is necessary to understand their nature, origin, frequency of their occurrence, safety risk, the risk mitigation measures, and the method to evaluate their safety. The current paper reviews the critical literature on these aspects and provides insight into considerations when performing safety assessment and managing the risk(s) for VPs in PDPs.

Translatability of findings from cynomolgus monkey to human suggests a mechanistic role for IL-21 in promoting immunogenicity to an anti-PD-1/IL-21 mutein fusion protein

AMG 256 is a bi-specific, heteroimmunoglobulin molecule with an anti-PD-1 antibody domain and a single IL-21 mutein domain on the C-terminus. Nonclinical studies in cynomolgus monkeys revealed that AMG 256 administration led to the development of immunogenicity-mediated responses and indicated that the IL-21 mutein domain of AMG 256 could enhance the anti-drug antibody response directed toward the monoclonal antibody domain. Anti-AMG 256 IgE were also observed in cynomolgus monkeys. A first-in-human (FIH) study in patients with advanced solid tumors was designed with these risks in mind. AMG 256 elicited ADA in 28 of 33 subjects (84.8%). However, ADA responses were only robust and exposure-impacting at the 2 lowest doses. At mid to high doses, ADA responses remained low magnitude and all subjects maintained exposure, despite most subjects developing ADA. Limited drug-specific IgE were also observed during the FIH study. ADA responses were not associated with any type of adverse event. The AMG 256 program represents a unique case where nonclinical studies informed on the risk of immunogenicity in humans, due to the IL-21-driven nature of the response.

Re-evaluating the need for chronic toxicity studies with therapeutic monoclonal antibodies, using a weight of evidence approach

To support registration of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) for chronic indications, 6-month toxicity studies have historically been conducted. Experience with mAb development has shown a relatively benign and well-understood safety profile for this class, with most toxicity findings anticipated based on pharmacology. We evaluated whether a 6-month toxicity study is necessary to assess the long-term safety of mAbs. Data on First-in-Human (FIH)-enabling and chronic toxicity studies were shared for 142 mAbs submitted by 11 companies. Opportunities to further optimize study designs to reduce animal usage were identified. For 71% of mAbs, no toxicities or no new toxicities were noted in chronic studies compared to FIH-enabling study findings. New toxicities of potential concern for human safety or that changed trial design were identified in 13.5% of cases, with 7% being considered critical and 2% leading to program termination. An iterative, weight-of-evidence model which considers factors that influence the overall risk for a mAb to cause toxicity was developed. This model enables an evidence-based justification, suggesting when 3-month toxicity studies are likely sufficient to support late-stage clinical development and registration for some mAbs.

Supportive care for animals on toxicology studies: An industrial best practices survey conducted by the IQ 3Rs TPS CRO Outreach Working Group

Contract Research Organizations (CROs) conducting toxicology studies on behalf of biopharmaceutical sponsors and others routinely provide supportive care for animals to minimize pain and distress on studies. A large number of guidance documents govern the care of experimental animals, however there is currently no uniform approach on the communication between sponsor and their CRO partners in providing a standard definition of and strategies for administering supportive care in toxicity studies. This survey was conducted by the CRO Outreach Working Group (WG), a part of the 3Rs Translational and Predictive Sciences (TPS) Leadership Group of the International Consortium for Innovation and Quality in Pharmaceutical Development (IQ Consortium), to better understand the provision of supportive care on nonclinical studies. The survey aimed to define supportive care strategies, identify alternatives to supportive care, and understand regulatory feedback and implications about supportive care decisions. The survey was distributed to members of the 3Rs Leadership Group of the IQ Consortium and several CRO partners, representing 35 organizations as potential respondents. The results of the survey from 13 respondents provided positive feedback that helped in highlighting the existing best practices for supportive care. Areas of enhancements identified included greater consistency in the inclusion of sponsor veterinarians on project teams for externalized studies, the timing of initiation of supportive care, and increased sharing of regulatory outcomes. Suggested best practices include creating a plan of action for veterinary care prior to study start, and enhancing information sharing regarding expected toxicities from previous study findings. Improved communication regarding supportive care will pave the way for enhanced 3Rs initiatives, refining the existing animal care paradigm and helping to ensure the most ethical toxicology study designs.

Nonclinical Development of Biologics: Integrating Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics to Create Smarter and More Flexible Nonclinical Safety Programs Optimizing Animal Use

Safety assessment of biological drugs has its challenges due to the multiple new different modalities, for example, antibody-drug conjugates, bispecifics, nanobodies, fusion proteins and advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs), their different pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, and their ability to trigger immunogenicity and toxicity. In the public and in the pharmaceutical industry, there is a strong and general desire to reduce the number of animals used in research and development of drugs and in particular reducing the use of nonhuman primates. Important discussions and activities are ongoing investigating the smarter designs of early research and dose range finding studies, reuse of animals, and replacing animal experiments with in vitro studies. Other important challenges include absence of a relevant species and design of studies and developing genetically modified animals for special investigative toxicology studies. Then, the learnings and challenges from the development of the first ATMPs are available providing valuable insights in the development path for these new potentially transformative treatments. Finally, development of strategies for assessment of immunogenicity and prediction of translation of immunogenicity and associated findings to the clinic. On this, the eighth meeting for the European BioSafe members, these challenges served as the basis for the presentations and discussions during the meeting. This article serves as the workshop report reviewing the presentations and discussions at the meeting.

BSTP Review of 12 Case Studies Discussing the Challenges, Pathology, Immunogenicity, and Mechanisms of Inhaled Biologics

The inhalation route is a relatively novel drug delivery route for biotherapeutics and, as a result, there is a paucity of published data and experience within the toxicology/pathology community. In recent years, findings arising in toxicology studies with inhaled biologics have provoked concern and regulatory challenges due, in part, to the lack of understanding of the expected pathology, mechanisms, and adversity induced by this mode of delivery. In this manuscript, the authors describe 12 case studies, comprising 18 toxicology studies, using a range of inhaled biotherapeutics (monoclonal antibodies, fragment antigen-binding antibodies, domain antibodies, therapeutic proteins/peptides, and an oligonucleotide) in rodents, nonhuman primates (NHPs), and the rabbit in subacute (1 week) to chronic (26 weeks) toxicology studies. Analysis of the data revealed that many of these molecules were associated with a characteristic pattern of toxicity with high levels of immunogenicity. Microscopic changes in the airways consisted of a predominantly lymphoid perivascular/peribronchiolar (PV/PB) mononuclear inflammatory cell (MIC) infiltrate, whereas changes in the terminal airways/alveoli were characterized by simple ("uncomplicated") increases in macrophages or inflammatory cell infiltrates ranging from mixed inflammatory cell infiltration to inflammation. The PV/PB MIC changes were considered most likely secondary to immunogenicity, whereas simple increases in alveolar macrophages were most likely secondary to clearance mechanisms. Alveolar inflammatory cell infiltrates and inflammation were likely induced by immune modulation or stimulation through pharmacologic effects on target biology or type III hypersensitivity (immune complex disease). Finally, a group of experts provide introductory thoughts regarding the adversity of inhaled biotherapeutics and the basis for reasonable differences of opinion that might arise between toxicologists, pathologists, and regulators.

Toxicologic Pathology Forum: Opinion on Obligatory Microscopic Examination of Intermediate-Dose Groups in Toxicity Studies With Biotherapeutics in Cynomolgus Monkeys

In nonrodent toxicity studies that are usually conducted in cynomolgus monkeys or beagle dogs, the added value of examining all tissues from all dose groups (current practice) versus all tissues in only control and high-dose groups and target tissues in intermediate-dose groups by default, is a subject of debate. A previous retrospective review of 325 nonrodent toxicity studies that included a limited number of biotherapeutics suggested that the evaluation of all tissues from all groups was not justified as a routine practice and recommended the examination of all tissues in control and high-dose groups and only target tissues in intermediate-dose groups. In contrast, the present retrospective review which examined 213 nonrodent studies (212 in cynomolgus monkeys and 1 in dog) from 4 multinational pharmaceutical companies (Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, and Roche) conducted only with biotherapeutics showed that restricting the microscopic examination in intermediate-dose groups to target tissues has the potential to miss findings in 6.6% of studies, possibly impacting the overall study interpretation and conclusion. In conclusion and in the opinion of the authors, all tissues from all dose groups should be examined in toxicity studies with biotherapeutics conducted in nonrodent species.

Industry experiences with immune-mediated findings in biotherapeutic nonclinical toxicology studies

With the growth of monoclonal antibodies and other proteins as major modalities in the pharmaceutical industry, there has been an increase in pharmacology and toxicity testing of biotherapeutics in animals. Animals frequently mount an immune response to human therapeutic proteins. This can result in asymptomatic anti-drug antibody formation, immune complexes that affect drug disposition and/or organ function such as kidney, cytokine release responses, fatal hypersensitivity, or a range of reactions in between. In addition, an increasing number of oncology therapeutics are being developed that enhance or directly stimulate immune responses by a variety of mechanisms, which could increase the risk of autoreactivity and an autoimmune-like syndrome in animals and humans. When evaluating the risk of biotherapeutics prior to entering the clinic, the nonclinical safety data may include any of these responses and it is critical to understand whether they represent a safety liability for humans. The DruSafe Leadership group of the IQ Consortium conducted a survey of industry to understand sponsors' experiences with these immune reactions in nonclinical studies related to both immunogenicity and pharmacologically-mediated immune perturbations. The survey covered what pathways were affected, how the immune responses were presented, how the company and health authorities interpreted the data and whether the immune responses were observed in the clinic. Additionally, the survey gathered information on association of these findings with anti-drug antibodies as well as sponsor's use of immunogenicity predictive tools. The data suggests that the ability of a biotherapeutic to activate the immune system, intended or not, plays a significant role on characteristics of the response and whether theys are translatable.

Formation and Glomerular Deposition of Immune Complexes in Mice Administered Human Antibodies: Evaluation of Dose, Frequency, and Biomarkers

Administration of human protein-based drugs to animals often leads to formation of antidrug antibodies (ADAs) that may form circulating immune complexes (CICs) with the dosed protein. Circulating immune complexes can activate and bind complement (cCICs), and if large amount of CICs or cCICs is formed, the clearance mechanism potentially becomes saturated, which can lead to immune complex (IC) deposition and inflammation. To obtain a better understanding of the underlying factors, including the relationship between different dose regimes on IC formation and deposition and identification of possible biomarkers of IC deposition and IC-related pathological changes in kidneys, BALB/c and C57BL/6J mice were administered with human anti-tumor necrosis factor α (aTNFα, adalimumab) or a humanized anti-TNP (aTNP) antibody for 13 weeks. Particularly, ADA, CIC, cCIC formation, IC deposition, and glomerulonephritis were observed in C57BL/6J administered with aTNFα, whereas the immunologic response was minor in BALB/c mice administered with aTNFα and in BALB/c and C57BL/6J mice administered aTNP. Changing dose levels or increasing dosing frequency of aTNFα on top of an already-established CIC and cCIC response did not lead to substantial changes in CIC, cCIC formation, or IC deposition. Finally, no association between the presence of CICs or cCIC in plasma and glomerular IC deposition and/or glomerulonephritis was observed.

Nonclinical safety evaluation of erenumab, a CGRP receptor inhibitor for the prevention of migraine

Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and its receptor have been implicated as a key mediator in the pathophysiology of migraine. Thus, erenumab, a monoclonal antibody antagonist of the CGRP receptor, administered as a once monthly dose of 70 or 140 mg has been approved for the preventive treatment of migraine in adults. Due to the species specificity of erenumab, the cynomolgus monkey was used in the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and toxicology studies to support the clinical program. There were no effects of erenumab on platelets in vitro (by binding, activation or phagocytosis assays). Specific staining of human tissues with erenumab did not indicated any off-target binding. There were no erenumab-related findings in a cardiovascular safety pharmacology study in cynomolgus monkeys or in vitro in human isolated coronary arteries. Repeat-dose toxicology studies conducted in cynomolgus monkeys at dose levels up to 225 mg/kg (1 month) or up to 150 mg/kg (up to 6 months) with twice weekly subcutaneous (SC) doses showed no evidence of erenumab-mediated adverse toxicity. There were no effects on pregnancy, embryo-fetal or postnatal growth and development in an enhanced pre-postnatal development study in the cynomolgus monkey. There was evidence of placental transfer of erenumab based on measurable serum concentrations in the infants up to 3 months post birth. The maternal and developmental no-observed-effect level (NOEL) was the highest dose tested (50 mg/kg SC Q2W). These nonclinical data in total indicate no safety signal of concern to date and provide adequate margins of exposure between the observed safe doses in animals and clinical dose levels.

Pros and cons of the immunogenicity of monoclonal antibodies in cancer treatment: a lesson from autoimmune diseases

The aim of this review is to report the current evidence on immunogenicity of monoclonal antibodies (moAbs) used in cancer compared with autoimmune diseases, focusing on local microenvironment. English abstracts were identified in Medline and www.clinicaltrials.gov . A total of 82 papers were selected. The percentage of immunogenicity of moAbs used for cancer therapy, evaluated as the serum concentration of antidrug antibodies, is significantly lower than that of moAbs used for the treatment of autoimmune diseases. This condition may rely on a different immunologic background characterized by a hyperactivation of immune cells in autoimmune diseases. The formation of complexes between antidrug antibodies and non-neutralizing moAbs bound to neoplastic antigens may allow more efficient elimination of cancer cells, but additional studies are needed.

Histopathological Findings in Cynomolgus Macaques ( Macaca fascicularis) Consistent with Secondary Immunological Reaction to Biotherapeutics with an Emphasis on the CNS and Eye

Biotherapeutics are pharmaceutical products derived from or synthesized by biological systems. Such molecules carry the potential for immunogenicity which may lead to adverse immune responses. The cynomolgus macaque ( Macaca fascicularis) is the species of choice in nonclinical safety assessment of biotherapeutics. The main aim of this study was to confirm whether mononuclear cell infiltrates at specific locations represent a generic effect of biotherapeutics, and therefore the result of their immunogenicity. Following a review of microscopic findings in studies conducted over a 10-year period at one test facility, 15% of biotherapeutics were reported to have such findings. The most commonly affected site was the choroid plexus and less frequently the meninges and ciliary body. The reporting of such findings as test article-related becomes more subjective as the severity and incidence decreases. To assess the accuracy of such associations, a mathematical approach was employed to determine the probability of obtaining the observed results by chance. There was good agreement between this approach and the original findings. In addition to an increased number and size of mononuclear cell infiltrates in the brain, biotherapeutic administration was strongly associated with the presence of plasma cells and eosinophils.

2018 White Paper on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis: focus on immunogenicity assays by hybrid LBA/LCMS and regulatory feedback (Part 2 - PK, PD & ADA assays by hybrid LBA/LCMS & regulatory agencies' inputs on bioanalysis, biomarkers and immunogenicity)

The 2018 12^th Workshop on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis took place in Philadelphia, PA, USA on April 9-13, 2018 with an attendance of over 900 representatives from pharmaceutical/biopharmaceutical companies, biotechnology companies, contract research organizations and regulatory agencies worldwide. WRIB was once again a 5-day, week-long event - a full immersion week of bioanalysis, biomarkers and immunogenicity. As usual, it was specifically designed to facilitate sharing, reviewing, discussing and agreeing on approaches to address the most current issues of interest including both small- and large-molecule bioanalysis involving LCMS, hybrid LBA/LCMS and LBA/cell-based assays approaches. This 2018 White Paper encompasses recommendations emerging from the extensive discussions held during the workshop and is aimed to provide the bioanalytical community with key information and practical solutions on topics and issues addressed, in an effort to enable advances in scientific excellence, improved quality and better regulatory compliance. Due to its length, the 2018 edition of this comprehensive White Paper has been divided into three parts for editorial reasons. This publication (Part 2) covers the recommendations for PK, PD and ADA assays by hybrid LBA/LCMS and regulatory agencies' input. Part 1 (LCMS for small molecules, peptides, oligonucleotides and small molecule biomarkers) and Part 3 (LBA/cell-based assays: immunogenicity, biomarkers and PK assays) are published in volume 10 of Bioanalysis, issues 22 and 24 (2018), respectively.

Immunogenicity and Immune Complex Disease in Preclinical Safety Studies

This article summarizes a continuing education presentation on immunogenicity that was part of a continuing education course entitled, “Clinical Pathology of Biotherapeutics.” Immunogenicity of a biotherapeutic can have diverse impacts including altered systemic exposure and pharmacologic responses and, in a fraction of the cases, safety concerns including cross-reactive neutralization of endogenous proteins or sequela related to immune complex disease (ICD). In most cases, immune complexes are readily cleared from circulation; however, based on physiochemical properties, insoluble complexes form, activate complement, and deposit in tissues. Using published information and personal experience, a set of repeat-dose monkey toxicity studies with manifestations suggestive of ICD was reviewed to summarize the spectrum of clinical and pathology findings. The most common live-phase observation linked to ICD was an acute postdosing reaction following multiple dose administrations characterized by generalized collapse and attributed to acute complement activation. Less common live-phase observations were related to syndromes such as a consumptive coagulopathy or a protein losing nephropathy. The most common histologic change attributed to ICD was multi-organ vascular/perivascular inflammation followed by glomerulonephritis. The presentation concluded with a description of the challenges in assessing the relevance of immunogenicity-related reaction in monkey to human clinical use.

Drug-induced Glomerulonephritis: The Spectre of Biotherapeutic and Antisense Oligonucleotide Immune Activation in the Kidney

Prevalence of immune-mediated glomerulonephritis has increased in preclinical toxicity studies, with more frequent use of biotherapeutic agents (especially antigenic humanized molecules) and antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) therapies. Immune complex disease affects a small number of study monkeys, often correlates with antidrug antibody (ADA) titers, and occurs at a dose that favors immune complex formation or impedes clearance. While preclinical glomerulonephritis often fails to correlate with evidence of glomerular or vascular injury in human clinical trials and is not considered predictive, additional animal investigative immunohistochemical work may be performed to substantiate evidence for immune complex pathogenesis. While ADA is most commonly encountered as a predisposing factor with biotherapeutic agents, complement activation may occur without circulating complexes, and other mechanisms of non-ADA immune-mediated glomerulonephritis have been observed including nonendogenous immune aggregates and immunoregulatory pharmacology. Although glomerulonephritis associated with oligonucleotide therapies has been noted occasionally in preclinical studies and more rarely with human patients, pathophysiologic mechanisms involved appear to be different between species and preclinical cases are not considered predictive for humans. ADA is not involved in oligonucleotide-associated cases, and complement fixation plays a more important role in monkeys. Recent screening of ASOs for proinflammatory activity appears to have decreased glomerulonephritis incidence preclinically.