Prophylactic oral amiodarone compared with placebo for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery

Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation After Cardiac Surgery: A Review of Literature and Comparison of Different Treatment Modalities

Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia to occur after cardiac surgery, with an incidence of 10% to 50%. It is associated with postoperative complications including increased risk of stroke, prolonged hospital stays and increased costs. Despite new insights into the mechanisms of atrial fibrillation, no specific etiologic factor has been identified as the sole perpetrator of the arrhythmia. Current evidence suggests that the pathophysiology of atrial fibrillation in general, as well as after cardiac surgery, is multifactorial. Studies have also shown that new-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation following cardiac surgery is associated with a higher risk of short-term and long-term mortality. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that prophylactic medical therapy decreases the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. Of note, the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation has not changed during the last decades despite the numerous preventive strategies and operative techniques proposed, although the perioperative and postoperative care of cardiac patients as such has improved.

Navigating the Incidence of Postoperative Arrhythmia and Hospitalization Length: The Role of Amiodarone and Other Antiarrhythmics in Prophylaxis

Antiarrhythmic drugs play a pivotal role in managing and preventing arrhythmias. Amiodarone, classified as a class III antiarrhythmic, has been used prophylactically to effectively prevent atrial fibrillation postoperatively in cardiac surgeries. However, there is a lack of consensus on the use of amiodarone and other antiarrhythmic drugs as prophylaxis to reduce the occurrence of all types of postoperative arrhythmias in cardiac and non-cardiac surgeries. A comprehensive PubMed query yielded 614 relevant papers, of which 52 clinical trials were analyzed. The data collection included the class of antiarrhythmics, timing or method of drug administration, surgery type, type of arrhythmia and its incidence, and hospitalization length. Statistical analyses focused on prophylactic antiarrhythmics and their respective reductions in postoperative arrhythmias and hospitalization length. Prophylactic amiodarone alone compared to placebo demonstrated a significant reduction in postoperative arrhythmia incidence in cardiac and non-cardiac surgeries (24.01%, p<0.0001), and it was the only treatment group to significantly reduce hospitalization length versus placebo (p = 0.0441). Prophylactic use of class 4 antiarrhythmics versus placebo also demonstrated a significant reduction in postoperative arrhythmia incidence (28.01%, p<0.0001), and while there was no significant statistical reduction compared to amiodarone (4%, p=0.9941), a lack of abundant data provides a case for further research on the prophylactic use of class 4 antiarrhythmics for this indication. Amiodarone prophylaxis remains a prime cornerstone of therapy in reducing postoperative arrhythmia incidence and hospitalization length. Emerging data suggests a need for a broader exploration of alternative antiarrhythmic agents and combination therapies, particularly class 4 antiarrhythmics, in both cardiac and non-cardiac surgeries. This meta-analysis depicts the effectiveness of amiodarone, among other antiarrhythmics, in postoperative arrhythmia incidence and hospitalization length reduction in cardiac and non-cardiac surgeries.

Healthcare resource utilization and costs for patients with postoperative atrial fibrillation in the United States

BACKGROUND

Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is one of the most common complications following cardiac surgery. POAF is associated with increased hospitalization costs, but its long-term economic burden is not well defined.

OBJECTIVE

To assess 30-day and 1-year incremental healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs associated with POAF in the United States (US).

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used claims data from the IBM Watson MarketScan database. A cohort of US adults aged 55--90 years who underwent open-heart surgery between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2018 was used to compare patients who experienced POAF versus patients who did not (controls). The outcomes of interest were incremental HRU and costs, which were assessed during the index hospitalization and 30-day and 1-year postdischarge time periods. Inverse probability weighting was used to adjust for differences in baseline characteristics.

RESULTS

A total of 8,020 patients met the study inclusion criteria with 5,765 patients in the control cohort (mean age, 63.4 years) and 2,255 patients in the POAF cohort (mean age, 65.8 years). After adjustment, patients with POAF had an index hospitalization that was 1.9 days longer (99% CI, 1.3-2.4 days; p < 0.001) and cost $13,919 more (99% CI, $2,828-$25,011; p < 0.001) than for patients without POAF. POAF patients also had significantly higher HRU at 30 days and 1-year postdischarge with incremental costs of $4,649 (99% CI, $1,479-$7,819; p < 0.001) and $10,671 (99% CI, $2,407-$18,935; p < 0.001), respectively.

CONCLUSION

POAF following open-heart surgery poses a significant economic burden up to 1 year postdischarge.

Does prophylactic low-dose amiodarone decrease the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass graft surgery? A randomized controlled trial

Background

Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) occurs within 1 to 5 days after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), with a peak occurrence on the second day. This research aimed to assess the role of dose-low amiodarone in the prevention of POAF after CABG.

Methods

This randomized controlled blind-single study was carried out on 150 patients undergoing elective CABG with sinus rhythm. Cases were randomized into two equal groups. The placebo group received matching placebo tablets. The amiodarone group received a prophylactic oral amiodarone 5 mg/kg/day for 6 days before and 6 days after surgery.

Results

The incidence of POAF was significantly lower in the amiodarone group compared to the placebo group (16% vs 33.3%, P = 0.013) with a relative risk of 0.48 times (95% confidence interval: 0.26–0.88). The onset of POAF, percent of patients responded to medication, and time elapsed to respond to medication were insignificantly different between both groups. The mean (± SD) of ICU stay was 2.51 ± 1.11 days in the amiodarone group versus 3.31 ± 1.83 days in the placebo group, and the mean (± SD) of hospital stay duration was 10 ± 1.99 days in the amiodarone group versus 12.72 ± 2.23 days in the placebo group. The length of ICU admission and hospital stay was significantly lower in the amiodarone group than in the placebo group (P = 0.002 and < 0.001, respectively).

Conclusions

Low-dose oral amiodarone was effective in POAF prevention after CABG with a lower length of ICU admission and hospital stay.

Trial registration

Pan African Clinical Trials Register PACTR202101651961317. Registered on 21 January 2021

Atrial Fibrillation Post Coronary Artery Graft Surgery: A Review Of Literature

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a failure that is observed in heart disease and is also known to be the most common heart rhythm disturbance post coronary artery bypass surgery. Although AF is considered a transient problem, it is usually accompanied with a variety of complications and morbidity for patients and may result in death. In the present study, pre- and post-operative considerable factors which may increase the risk and mortality of AF, and possible treatments have been concisely reviewed.

Dataset for amiodarone adverse events compared to placebo using data from randomized controlled trials

The dataset presented here provides a detailed description of the adverse events of amiodarone versus placebo using data from 43 randomized controlled trials. Two authors (M.M., M.R.) independently extracted the data. The dataset also includes baseline patient characteristics, amiodarone loading and maintenance doses, as well as forest plots describing the relative risk (RR) of developing an adverse event related to the pulmonary, thyroid, hepatic, cardiac, skin, gastrointestinal, neurological, and ocular systems. The Mantel-Haenszel random effects model was used to determine the relative risk of adverse events of amiodarone compared to placebo. This dataset is complementary to our article “Meta-analysis Comparing the Relative Risk of Adverse Events for Amiodarone Versus Placebo”, which was published in the American Journal of Cardiology [1]. The data can be used to assess certain adverse events and their relation to amiodarone loading and/or maintenance dose.

Simple Amiodarone Protocol Reduces Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation

Background

Incorporating amiodarone into an existing postoperative atrial fibrillation (AF) prevention pathway may reduce postoperative AF and length of stay (LOS).

Methods

From July 2002 through December 2002, 476 consecutive cardiac surgical patients were managed with an AF prevention protocol using aggressive potassium replacement, intraoperative/ postoperative magnesium supplementation, and postoperative resumption of β-blockers. From January 2003 through June 2003, 592 additional patients were subjected to the same protocol except amiodarone was initiated intraoperatively (150 mg intravenously) and continued postoperatively until discharge (200 mg orally three times daily). Incidence of AF, postoperative LOS, and AF risk factors were collected prospectively and compared using regression models with propensity scores to adjust for dissimilarities between groups.

Results

Incorporating amiodarone into an existing AF protocol resulted in a 45% reduction in postoperative AF (29% [136/476] versus 16% [94/592], P < 0.0001). After adjustment for covariates and propensity score, the relative risk reduction with amiodarone in this protocol remained significant (P = 0.001, RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.5–0.8). Multivariate risks for postoperative AF included no amiodarone (P = 0.0001), age (P < 0.0001), ejection fraction <40% (P = 0.0005), ventilator support >24 hours (P = 0.002), no postoperative β-blocker (P = 0.002), and mitral valve procedure (P = 0.03). When postoperative AF did occur, risk adjusted LOS was less in patients on the amiodarone protocol (mean 9.4 days versus 13.1 days, P = 0.06). Readmission after discharge for any reason (10% [49/476] versus 8% [45/592], P = 0.1) or for AF (1.1% [5/476] versus 0.7% [4/592], P = 0.5) was similar between groups.

Conclusion

Amiodarone initiated intraoperatively followed by oral dosing significantly reduces postoperative AF and tends to reduce LOS if AF occurs.

Posterior Left pericardiotomy for the prevention of postoperative Atrial fibrillation after Cardiac Surgery (PALACS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is a common complication following cardiac surgery. POAF is associated with increased morbidity and hospital costs. We herein describe the protocol for a randomized controlled trial to determine if performing a posterior left pericardiotomy prevents POAF after cardiac surgery.

METHODS/DESIGN

All patients submitted to cardiac surgery at our institution will be screened for inclusion into the study. The study will consist of two parallel arms with random allocation between groups to either receive a posterior left pericardiotomy or serve as a control. Masking will be done in a single-blinded fashion to the patient. Patients will be continuously monitored postoperatively for the occurrence of atrial fibrillation until discharge. At the follow-up clinic visit (15-30 days after surgery), the primary endpoint (atrial fibrillation) and other secondary endpoints, such as pleural or pericardial effusion, will be assessed. A total sample size of 350 subjects will be recruited.

DISCUSSION

POAF is associated with increased morbidity, prolonged hospital stay, and increased costs after cardiac surgery. Several strategies aimed at reducing the incidence of POAF have been investigated, including beta-blockers, amiodarone, and statins, all with suboptimal results. Posterior left pericardiotomy has been associated with a reduction of POAF in previous series. However, these studies had limited sample sizes and suboptimal methodology, so that the efficacy of posterior pericardiotomy in preventing POAF remains to be definitively proven. Our randomized trial aims to determine the effect of a posterior left pericardiotomy on the incidence of POAF.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT02875405 , protocol record 1502015867. Registered on July 2016.

Comparison of posttransplant outcomes in patients with no, acute, or chronic amiodarone use before heart transplantation

Background

Major concerns about the safety of pretransplant amiodarone use have been raised. As a result of its long half-life, the cardiac allograft is exposed to amiodarone posing potential risks such as bradycardia, requirement for pacemaker implantation, or increased mortality after heart transplantation (HTX).

Objective

The aim of this study is to investigate the posttransplant outcomes of patients with no, acute, or chronic amiodarone use before HTX.

Methods

This retrospective single-center study included 530 adult patients who received HTX between 06/1989 and 12/2012. Patients were stratified by their amiodarone therapy before HTX: no continuous amiodarone use (≤90 days before HTX), acute amiodarone use (≤90 days before HTX), and chronic amiodarone use (>90 days before HTX). Differences between the 3 groups in demographics, posttransplant medication, echocardiographic features, heart rates including occurrences of bradycardia, permanent pacemaker implantation, atrial fibrillation (AF), and survival were analyzed.

Results

A total of 412 patients (77.7%) were in the “no amiodarone” group, 23 patients (4.4%) in the “acute amiodarone” group, and 95 patients (17.9%) in the “chronic amiodarone” group. Left ventricular ejection fraction (P=0.5819), heart rates including occurrence of bradycardia during posttransplant week 1 (P=0.0979 and P=0.2695), week 2 (P=0.1214 and P=0.8644), week 3 (P=0.1033 and P=0.8894), and week 4 (P=0.2892 and P=0.8644), permanent pacemaker implantation within 30-day (P=0.8644), or overall follow-up after HTX (P=0.8664) were not significant between groups. Patients with chronic pretransplant amiodarone therapy had the lowest rate of early posttransplant AF (P=0.0065). There was no statistically significant difference between groups in 30-day (P=0.8656), 1-year (P=1.0000), 2-year (P=0.8763), 5-year (P=0.5174), or overall posttransplant follow-up mortality (P=0.1936).

Conclusion

Administration of acute or chronic pretransplant amiodarone was not related to an increased occurrence of bradycardia, requirement for permanent pacemaker implantation, or mortality after HTX. Importantly, chronic amiodarone use effectively reduced early AF after HTX, whereas acute amiodarone use showed no such effect.

Amiodaron in atrial fibrillation: post coronary artery bypass graft

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrilation (AF) is the most common complication following heart surgeries; it often occurs in patients after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). The purpose of this review is to categorize prophylaxes or treatment by administration of Amiodaron in patients with CABG.

DATA RESOURCES

We searched google scholar, pubmed, and Cochrane Library databases (the period 1970-2010) for articles on Amiodaron in CABG and cardiac surgery. A total of 1 561 articles were identified, and 30 articles met the criteria and were enrolled in this review.

RESULTS

Most studies supported Amiodarone for prophylaxi purpose in patients who were performed with CABG; few papers supported Amiodaron as a drug for treating CABG. The prophylaxis can decrease the incidence rate of AF in CABG, but if it uses as a treatment, the side effect of Amiodaron will decrease because all of the patients will not get Amiodarone. In the other hand use of Amiodarone as a treatment does not influence the length of hospital stay significantly but these kinds of study are so few.

CONCLUSION

No appropriate therapeutic method has been defined for AF. At present, the common way of treating AF following cardiac surgery is mainly based on prophylaxis in medical books and references.

Amiodarone Versus Propafenone to Treat Atrial Fibrillation after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Randomized Double Blind Controlled Trial

Background

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the most common complications after cardiac surgery. Several therapeutic and preventive strategies have been introduced for postoperative AF, but the treatment and prophylaxis of AF remain controversial. We aimed to compare the efficacy of intravenous amiodarone and oral propafenone in the treatment of AF after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

Methods

This was a randomized controlled trial performed in two hospitals in Shiraz, Iran from 2009 to 2012. We included all patients who underwent elective CABG and developed AF postoperatively. The patients were randomly assigned to receive propafenone or amiodarone. The duration of AF, the success rate of the treatment, the need for cardioversion, the frequency of repeated AF, and the need for repeating the treatment were compared.

Results

The duration of the first (p=0.361), second (p=0.832), and third (p=0.298) episodes of AF, the need for cardioversion (p=0.998), and the need to repeat the first and second doses of drugs (p=0.557, 0.699) were comparable between the study groups. Repeated AF was observed in 17 patients (30.9%) in the propafenone group and 23 patients (34.3%) in the amiodarone group (p=0.704).

Conclusion

Oral propafenone and intravenous amiodarone are equally effective in the treatment and conversion of recent-onset AF after CABG.

Levosimendan Use Decreases Atrial Fibrillation in Patients after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Pilot Study

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) often occurs after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and can result in increased morbidity and mortality due to complications. In the present study, our goal was to investigate whether the use of levosimendan can reduce the frequency of AF after coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with poor left ventricle function. Material and Methods: To investigate the effectiveness of levosimendan in the prophylaxis of AF, we conducted a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical study on 200 consecutive patients in whom we performed elective CABG operations. Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. A control group of 100 patients were treated with placebo (500 mL saline solution), whereas the levosimendan group (n = 100 patients) was treated with levosimendan. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein, cardiac troponin, and creatine kinase–MB levels were measured before surgery and 5 days postoperatively. Results: AF occurred in 12% of the levosimendan group and 36% of the control group. The occurrence of AF was significantly lower in the levosimendan group (P < 0.05). The duration of AF in the levosimendan group was significantly shorter than that in the control group (4.83 ± 1.12 and 6.50 ± 1.55 hours, respectively; P = 0.028). Our research showed that C-reactive protein was higher postoperatively in the control group than in the levosimendan group (P < 0.05). Conclusions: The incidence of postoperative AF in the levosimendan group was reduced significantly in patients with poor left ventricle function after CABG operations.

Interventions for preventing post-operative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing heart surgery

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation is a common post-operative complication of cardiac surgery and is associated with an increased risk of post-operative stroke, increased length of intensive care unit and hospital stays, healthcare costs and mortality. Numerous trials have evaluated various pharmacological and non-pharmacological prophylactic interventions for their efficacy in preventing post-operative atrial fibrillation. We conducted an update to a 2004 Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature to gain a better understanding of the effectiveness of these interventions.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective was to assess the effects of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for preventing post-operative atrial fibrillation or supraventricular tachycardia after cardiac surgery. Secondary objectives were to determine the effects on post-operative stroke or cerebrovascular accident, mortality, cardiovascular mortality, length of hospital stay and cost of treatment during the hospital stay.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of ControlLed Trials (CENTRAL) (Issue 8, 2011), MEDLINE (from 1946 to July 2011), EMBASE (from 1974 to July 2011) and CINAHL (from 1981 to July 2011).

SELECTION CRITERIA

We selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that included adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery who were allocated to pharmacological or non-pharmacological interventions for the prevention of post-operative atrial fibrillation or supraventricular tachycardia, except digoxin, potassium (K(+)), or steroids.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently abstracted study data and assessed trial quality.

MAIN RESULTS

One hundred and eighteen studies with 138 treatment groups and 17,364 participants were included in this review. Fifty-seven of these studies were included in the original version of this review while 61 were added, including 27 on interventions that were not considered in the original version. Interventions included amiodarone, beta-blockers, sotalol, magnesium, atrial pacing and posterior pericardiotomy. Each of the studied interventions significantly reduced the rate of post-operative atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery compared with a control. Beta-blockers (odds ratio (OR) 0.33; 95% confidence interval) CI 0.26 to 0.43; I(2) = 55%) and sotalol (OR 0.34; 95% CI 0.26 to 0.43; I(2) = 3%) appear to have similar efficacy while magnesium's efficacy (OR 0.55; 95% CI 0.41 to 0.73; I(2) = 51%) may be slightly less. Amiodarone (OR 0.43; 95% CI 0.34 to 0.54; I(2) = 63%), atrial pacing (OR 0.47; 95% CI 0.36 to 0.61; I(2) = 50%) and posterior pericardiotomy (OR 0.35; 95% CI 0.18 to 0.67; I(2) = 66%) were all found to be effective. Prophylactic intervention decreased the hospital length of stay by approximately two-thirds of a day and decreased the cost of hospital treatment by roughly $1250 US. Intervention was also found to reduce the odds of post-operative stroke, though this reduction did not reach statistical significance (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.47 to 1.01; I(2) = 0%). No significant effect on all-cause or cardiovascular mortality was demonstrated.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Prophylaxis to prevent atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery with any of the studied pharmacological or non-pharmacological interventions may be favored because of its reduction in the rate of atrial fibrillation, decrease in the length of stay and cost of hospital treatment and a possible decrease in the rate of stroke. However, this review is limited by the quality of the available data and heterogeneity between the included studies. Selection of appropriate interventions may depend on the individual patient situation and should take into consideration adverse effects and the cost associated with each approach.

Examining the safety of amiodarone

INTRODUCTION

Amiodarone is the most widely used antiarrhythmic agent, with demonstrated effectiveness against all the spectrum of cardiac tachyarrhythmias. The risk of adverse effects acts as a limiting factor to its utilization especially in the long term. This article systematically reviews the published evidence on amiodarone versus placebo to examine its safety as an antiarrhythmic drug.

AREAS COVERED

Authors collected data on adverse effects reported in 49 randomized placebo-controlled trials with amiodarone. Adverse effects were classified according to the organ/system involved. Pooled estimates of the number needed to treat (NNT) and to harm (NNH) versus placebo were calculated.

EXPERT OPINION

Amiodarone is effective for both the acute conversion of atrial fibrillation (AF) (11 trials, NNT = 4 at 24 h; p = 0.003) and the prevention of postoperative AF (18 trials, NNT = 8; p < 0.001), although with an increased risk of bradycardia, hypotension, nausea or phlebitis (pooled NNH = 4; p < 0.001). Amiodarone administration for the maintenance of sinus rhythm has a favorable net clinical benefit (pooled NNT = 3; p < 0.001 versus pooled NNH for either thyroid toxicity, gastrointestinal discomfort, skin toxicity or eye toxicity = 11; p < 0.001). Treatment with amiodarone for the prophylaxis of sudden cardiac death has less favorable net clinical benefit (15 trials, NNT = 38; p < 0.001 versus NNH for either thyroid toxicity, hepatic toxicity, pulmonary toxicity or bradycardia = 14; p < 0.001). Amiodarone treatment in this setting should be used in only selected cases.

Comparison of the Length of Hospital Stay between the Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Treated with Amiodarone and Patients with Normal Sinus Rhythm after Coronary Artery Bypass Graft

INTRODUCTION

Postoperative atrial fibrillation occurs in 20 % to 40 % of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting ( CABG ) and contributes to increasing length of stay and hospital cost . The purpose of our study was to compare the length of hospital stay between patients of postoperative atrial fibrillation treated with amiodarone (experimental) and those with normal sinus rhythm ( NSR ) (Control ) after CABG.

METHODS

From October of 2008 to October 2010, our experimental group including 26 patients was treated with amiodarone in Tabriz Madani Heart Center. The background variables, length of atrial fibrillation, and length of hospital stay were recorded. The experimental group was compared with a control group of 50 patients. The two groups were the same in terms of age, gender, ejection fraction, vascular diseases and risk factors.

RESULTS

The hospital stay duration was 8.0 ±1.6 and 7.4 ±1.4 days (p = 0.08) for experimental, and control groups respectively. Atrial fibrillation occurred mainly (60%) on the second postoperative day.

CONCLUSION

25 patients out of 26 patients (96 %) returned to NSR after starting the amiodarone protocol and the length of hospital stay in the experimental group was not significantly different from that of the control group. Thus, treating with Amiodarone in postoperative atrial fibrillation can reduce hospital stay duration compared to that of normal sinus patients.

Pharmacologic prophylaxis for atrial fibrillation following cardiac surgery: a systematic review

Atrial Fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia occurring after cardiac surgery. Its incidence varies depending on type of surgery. Postoperative AF may cause hemodynamic deterioration, predispose to stroke and increase mortality. Effective treatment for prophylaxis of postoperative AF is vital as reduces hospitalization and overall morbidity. Beta-blockers, have been proved to prevent effectively atrial fibrillation following cardiac surgery and should be routinely used if there are no contraindications. Sotalol may be more effective than standard b-blockers for the prevention of AF without causing an excess of side effects. Amiodarone is useful when beta-blocker therapy is not possible or as additional prophylaxis in high risk patients. Other agents such as magnesium, calcium channels blocker or non-antiarrhythmic drugs as glycose-insulin--potassium, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, corticosteroids, N-acetylcysteine and statins have been studied as alternative treatment for postoperative AF prophylaxis.

Intraoperative loading dose of amiodarone for prophylaxis against atrial fibrillation after valvular heart surgery

Objective:

Benefit of amiodarone in restoring sinus rhythm (SR) after cardiac surgery was concluded in previous studies that used different protocols for giving amiodarone. The purpose of this study was to assess the use of single parenteral intraoperative loading dose of amiodarone without maintenance as prophylaxis against atrial fibrillation (AF) after valvular heart surgery.

Materials and Methods:

This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled study on 94 patients listed for valvular heart surgery. The patients received either amiodarone, 3 mg/kg diluted in 100 ml of normal saline and started prior to making skin incision and administrated through venous line over a period of 30 minutes, or the same volume of normal saline infused in a similar fashion. The incidence of AF during the first 5 days after surgery was the main outcome measured.

Results:

There was significant difference in favor of the amiodarone group regarding restoration of sinus rhythm after aortic cross-clamp removal, number of patients requiring cardioversion, incidence of AF and the time elapsed before incidence of it postoperatively (P values=0.02, 0.04, 0.02, 0.02, respectively). There was no difference in hospital mortality, major postoperative morbidity, intensive care unit (ICU) stay or hospital stay.

Conclusions:

Amiodarone prophylaxis in a single intraoperative dose was significantly effective in prevention of new-onset postoperative AF after valvular heart surgery. This amiodarone dose is well tolerated and not associated with postoperative complications.

Biatrial pacing vs. intravenous amiodarone in prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery

This study was aimed to compare the results of post operative biatrial pacing and i.v. amiodarone in prevention of AF. In a single blind randomized clinical trial, 210 patients scheduled for elective CABG surgery were randomized either to receive overdrive biatrial pacing, i.v. amiodarone or no intervention. Incidence of AF postoperatively evaluated. Pacing was successful in 83% of patients and 80% of patients in amiodarone group could receive their drug. Twenty and one patients developed AF. Incidence of AF in pace, amiodarone and control group was 10.7, 5.3 and 17.9%, respectively (p = 0.08). Comparing incidence of AF between pacing and control group, the difference was not significant (p = 0.2), but the difference between amiodarone and control groups was significant statistically (p = 0.03). Patients who developed AF were older but their left ventricular ejection fraction was not different with patients without AF. The ICU stay was higher in patients with AF. Use of i.v. amiodarone was more effective than biatrial pacing in prevention of post operative AF and we recommend use of this drug in high risk patients.

Does Sodium Nitroprusside Decrease the Incidence of Atrial Fibrillation After Myocardial Revascularization?

Background— Atrial fibrillation (AF) often occurs after coronary artery bypass grafting and can result in increased morbidity and mortality. In the present pilot study, our aim was to investigate whether sodium nitroprusside (SNP), as a nitric oxide donor, can reduce the frequency of post–coronary artery bypass grafting AF.

Methods and Results— To investigate the effectiveness of SNP in the prophylaxis of AF, we conducted a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical study on 100 consecutive patients in whom we performed elective and initial CABG operations. A control group of 50 patients were treated with placebo (dextrose 5% in water), whereas the SNP group (n=50 patients) was treated with SNP (0.5 μg · kg −1 · min −1 ) during the rewarming period. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels were measured before surgery and 5 days postoperatively. All patients were monitored postoperatively with telemetry. Baseline characteristics were similar in both treatment groups. AF occurred in 12% of the SNP group and 27% of the control group. The occurrence of AF was significantly lower in the SNP group ( P =0.005). The duration of AF in the SNP group was significantly shorter than that in the control group (5.33±1.86 and 7.55±1.94 hours, respectively; P =0.023). C-reactive protein levels were higher postoperatively in the control group than in the SNP group ( P <0.05). Postoperative AF significantly prolonged postoperative hospital stay ( P <0.05).

Conclusions— The incidence of postoperative AF in the SNP group was reduced significantly. Further studies are needed to better delineate the anti-AF profile of SNP.

Prevention of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery

Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia occurring after heart surgery. Its prevalence after coronary artery bypass surgery is 17-33%. Atrial fibrillation requires additional treatment, lengthens hospitalization and increases the overall expenses of cardiac surgery. Atrial fibrillation can cause hemodynamic problems, predispose to congestive heart failure and increase the risk of stroke. Beta-blockers have been shown to effectively prevent atrial fibrillation, and beta-blockers should be a part of the medication of every patient undergoing cardiac surgery, if there are no contraindications. Amiodarone therapy can also be considered for especially high-risk patients.

The Changing Face of Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation Prevention

Atrial fibrillation is the most common postoperative arrhythmia with significant consequences on patient health. Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) complicates up to 8% of all noncardiac surgeries, between 3% and 30% of noncardiac thoracic surgeries, and between 16% and 46% of cardiac surgeries. POAF has been associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and longer, more costly hospital stays. The risk of POAF after cardiac and noncardiac surgery may be affected by several epidemiologic and intraoperative factors, as well as by the presence of preexisting cardiovascular and pulmonary disorders. POAF is typically a transient, reversible phenomenon that may develop in patients who possess an electrophysiologic substrate for the arrhythmia that is present before or as a result of surgery. Numerous studies support the efficacy of beta-blockers in POAF prevention; they are currently the most common medication used in POAF prophylaxis. Perioperative amiodarone, sotalol, nondihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, and magnesium sulfate have been associated with a reduction in the occurrence of POAF. Biatrial pacing is a nonpharmacologic method that has been associated with a reduced risk of POAF. Additionally, recent studies have demonstrated that hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitors may decrease the risk of POAF. Finally, based on recent evidence that angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers reduce the risk of permanent atrial fibrillation, these medications may also hold promise in POAF prophylaxis. However, there is a need for further large-scale investigations that incorporate standard methodologies and diagnostic criteria, which have been lacking in past trials.

Amiodarone Prophylaxis: Impact on Atrial Fibrillation and Outcomes after Cardiac Surgery

This continuing feature will update readers on recent developments in cardiovascular pharmacotherapy. Cardiovascular disease remains the number one killer in the United States, and more clinical outcome trials have been conducted in cardiology than in any other field of medicine. Given this rapidly expanding knowledge base, pharmacists can have a significant impact on prevention and treatment—if they keep current with developments in drug therapy.

Intravenous and oral amiodarone for the prevention of postoperative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation is still a frequent complication that increases morbidity after coronary artery bypass grafting. This prospective randomized study is designed to define efficacy of postoperative amiodarone prophylaxis in preventing atrial fibrillation after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.

METHODS

One hundred forty-four patients who underwent elective off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting were enrolled for the study. Seventy-six patients (amiodarone group) received 5 mg/kg loading amiodarone infusion in the first postoperative hour, followed by 10 mg/kg for the first 24 hours. After 24 hours, patients received 600 mg/day amiodarone orally for 7 days and 200 mg/day until the end of the postoperative first month. Sixty-eight patients received placebo (control group).

RESULTS

Preoperative characteristics and operative variables of the patients were similar in both groups. Incidence of new-onset atrial fibrillation and maximal ventricular rate response were recorded. The incidence of new-onset atrial fibrillation (11.8% versus 26.5%) (P = .025) and maximal ventricular rate response (109 +/- 13.8 beats/min versus 124.5 +/- 13.9 beats/min) (P = .011) were significantly lower in the amiodarone group. Duration of atrial fibrillation was 17.5 +/- 8.1 hours for the amiodarone group compared with 32.7 +/- 12 hours for the control group (P = .002).

CONCLUSION

Postoperative intravenous amiodarone prophylaxis followed by oral amiodarone significantly reduces the incidence of atrial fibrillation after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting and the ventricular rate during atrial fibrillation.

Practical regimen for amiodarone use in preventing postoperative atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Postoperative atrial fibrillation occurs in 5% to 65% of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Although postoperative atrial fibrillation is often regarded as a temporary, benign, operation-related problem, it is associated with a twofold to threefold increase in risk of adverse events, including permanent or transient stroke, acute myocardial infarction, and death.

METHODS

This randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial included 250 eligible consecutively enrolled patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). They received 300 mg of amiodarone/placebo administered intravenously over 20 minutes on the first postoperative day and an oral dose of 600 mg of amiodarone or placebo twice daily for the first 5 postoperative days.

RESULTS

The patients in amiodarone prophylaxis experienced a reduction in risk of atrial fibrillation of 14% (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.0% to 24%), with the number needed to treat at 6.9 (95% CI, 4.2 to 20), and the results for symptomatic atrial fibrillation showed a risk reduction of 18% (95% CI, 9.4% to 26), with the number needed to treat at 5.7 (95% CI, 3.9 to 11). Of the patients who developed atrial fibrillation in the placebo group, 84% experienced a symptomatic attack versus only 43% in the amiodarone group.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative prophylaxis with a high dose of oral amiodarone after an intravenous bolus infusion is a safe, practical, feasible, and effective regimen for CABG patients. It significantly diminishes the occurrence of postoperative atrial fibrillation.

Amiodarone Prophylaxis for Atrial Fibrillation After Cardiac Surgery: Meta-Analysis of Dose Response and Timing of Initiation

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To investigate a possible dose-response relationship between amiodarone and reduction in incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation, and to determine whether pre- or postoperative initiation of amiodarone is superior.

DESIGN

Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

DATA SOURCE

MEDLINE and EMBASE databases and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for English-language reports published between 1966 and December 2005.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Of 23 identified randomized controlled trials of amiodarone prophylaxis of postoperative atrial fibrillation, 14 were included in the final analysis. These studies enrolled a total of 2864 patients. For each study, the total administered amiodarone dose--categorized as low (< 3000 mg), medium (3000-5000 mg), or high (> 5000 mg)--and preoperative versus postoperative initiation were aggregated by using meta-analytic techniques. The incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation was significantly reduced by amiodarone compared with placebo (p<0.001). Although the odds of developing atrial fibrillation appeared to be somewhat higher in the low-dose group, no significant differences were noted in the odds ratios (ORs) of developing atrial fibrillation among the low-, medium-, and high-dose groups: OR 0.58, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44-0.77; OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.30-0.69; and OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.33-0.58; respectively (p=0.238). In addition, the ORs for atrial fibrillation development associated with preoperative and postoperative initiation of amiodarone were not significantly different (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.39-0.63; and OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.37-0.63; respectively, p=0.862).

CONCLUSION

Total amiodarone doses of 3000 mg or higher may be more effective than lower doses in reducing the rate of postoperative atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. Preoperative initiation of amiodarone appears to be unnecessary. These findings require confirmation in prospective, randomized trials.

Prophylactic Amiodarone for Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation After Cardiac Surgery: A Meta-Analysis

Amiodarone has been proposed to decrease atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. The literature was systematically reviewed for randomized trials comparing amiodarone with control for prevention of atrial fibrillation. Data were extracted on study characteristics, quality, and incidence of atrial fibrillation, cardiovascular outcomes, and length of hospitalization. Nineteen trials were included. Amiodarone reduced the odds ratio of atrial fibrillation (0.50; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.43 to 0.59, p < 0.0001), ventricular tachyarrhythmias (0.39; 95% CI: 0.26 to 0.58, p < 0.0001), and strokes (0.53; 95% CI: 0.30 to 0.92, p = 0.02). Amiodarone reduced hospital stay (0.6 days; 95% CI: 0.4 to 0.8, p < 0.0001). Amiodarone decreased atrial fibrillation, reduced perioperative ventricular tachyarrhythmias and strokes, and reduced duration of hospitalization. The current evidence supports recommending the routine use of perioperative amiodarone for cardiac surgery.

Cost-effectiveness of amiodarone for prophylaxis of atrial fibrillation after cardiothoracic surgery

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine whether prophylactic amiodarone, dosed according to Atrial Fibrillation Suppression Trial (AFIST) I and II regimens, is a cost-effective strategy for prevention of postoperative atrial fibrillation.

DESIGN

Cost-effectiveness analysis of retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Urban, academic hospital.

PATIENTS

A total of 2046 patients who underwent cardiothoracic surgery between February 1, 1998, and October 31, 2003. Of these patients, 186 received amiodarone and 1860 served as controls.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Each patient who received prophylactic amiodarone using the AFIST I or II dosing strategies was matched for age, sex, history of valvular surgery, history of atrial fibrillation, beta-blocker intolerance, and receipt of preoperative digoxin therapy with 10 patients who did not receive prophylactic amiodarone. Occurrence of postoperative atrial fibrillation, total hospital costs, and both intensive care unit (ICU) and total hospital length of stay (LOS) were compared between groups. Nonparametric bootstrapping was conducted to examine study results as part of a quadrant analysis and to calculate confidence intervals for the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. The ICU and total hospital LOS, and total costs for patients with and without postoperative atrial fibrillation were also compared. Fewer patients receiving prophylactic amiodarone developed postoperative atrial fibrillation compared with controls (23.1% vs 29.9%, p=0.05). Total hospital costs for the amiodarone group were 28% less than those for the control group (24,131 US dollars +/- 26,539 vs 33,518 US dollars +/- 40,892, p=0.002). Approximately 98% of the time, patients receiving amiodarone prophylaxis fell into the quadrant that showed superior efficacy and lower total costs. Patients who developed postoperative atrial fibrillation, compared with those who did not, regardless of amiodarone prophylaxis, had a longer mean +/- SD stay in the ICU (6.9 +/- 17.1 vs 3.7 +/- 7.9 days, p<0.001), a longer mean total hospital LOS (14.8 +/- 18.8 vs 10.2 +/- 10.4 days, p+/-0.001), and higher mean total hospital costs (41,574 US dollars +/- 54,721 vs 28,968 US dollars +/- 31,046, p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Prophylactic amiodarone was shown to reduce the occurrence of postoperative atrial fibrillation as well as total hospital costs in patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgery. In patients who developed postoperative atrial fibrillation, both ICU and total hospital LOS as well as total hospital costs were increased.

Risk-Stratified Evaluation of Amiodarone to Prevent Atrial Fibrillation After Cardiac Surgery

BACKGROUND

Amiodarone prophylaxis (AMP) reduces the prevalence of postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) after cardiac surgery. We investigated the impact of AMP on the frequency and duration of POAF, the intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, and its cost-effectiveness in a risk-stratified cohort.

METHODS

A retrospective, observational analysis of 509 patients who underwent cardiac surgery in 2003 was performed. Data sources included The Society of Thoracic Surgeons national database; medical and medication administration records; and the activity-based cost data from our institution. Risk stratification for POAF was determined using a validated risk index. Cost-effectiveness was determined from the hospital's perspective.

RESULTS

The mean patient age was 63 years, 27% were female, 80% underwent coronary artery bypass grafting, and 29% underwent valve surgery. When a risk-stratified evaluation was made, 50% of patients were at an elevated risk for having POAF develop. When compared with nonprophylaxed patients, those receiving AMP (59%) experienced less POAF (31% vs 22%; p = 0.027) and shorter durations of POAF (4.7 vs 2.7 days; p = 0.025). In the elevated-risk group, AMP clinically (but not significantly) reduced length of stay in the intensive care unit (101 vs 68 hours; p > 0.05) and post-procedural hospital length of stay (9.7 vs. 7.9 days, p > 0.05). In the elevated-risk group, AMP was robustly cost-effective in reducing POAF.

CONCLUSIONS

Amiodarone prophylaxis reduced the prevalence and duration of POAF. Baseline risk for POAF was a major determinant of the overall cost-effectiveness of AMP. The greatest cost savings with AMP was seen in patients at an elevated risk for POAF. These findings suggest the need for risk stratification when prescribing AMP.

Amiodarone prophylaxis for atrial fibrillation of high-risk patients after coronary bypass grafting: a prospective, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized study

AIMS

Atrial fibrillation (AF) occurs often in patients after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and can result in increased morbidity and mortality. Previous studies using P-wave signal-averaged electrocardiogram (P-SAECG) have shown that patients with a longer filtered P-wave duration (FPD) have a high risk of AF after CABG. We have shown that patients with an FPD > or = 124 ms and a root-mean-square voltage of the last 20 ms of the P-wave 20 < or = 3.7 microV have an increased risk of AF after surgery. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to investigate whether or not prophylactic peri-operative administration of amiodarone could reduce the incidence of AF in this high-risk group undergoing CABG identified by P-SAECG.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this prospective, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized study, 110 patients received either amiodarone (n = 55) or placebo (n = 55). During CABG, two patients of both groups died. Amiodarone was given as 600 mg oral single dose one day before and from days 2 through 7 after surgery. In addition, amiodarone was also administered intravenously during surgery in a 300-mg bolus for 1 h and as a total maintenance dose of 20 mg/kg weight over 24 h on the first day following surgery. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of AF after CABG. The secondary endpoint was the hospitalization length of stay after CABG. The baseline characteristics were similar in both treatment groups. The incidence of post-operative AF was significantly higher in the placebo group compared with the amiodarone group (85 vs. 34% of patients, P < 0.0001). The prophylactic therapy with amiodarone significantly reduced the intensive care (1.8 +/- 1.7 vs. 2.4 +/- 1.5 days, P = 0.001) and hospitalization length of stay (11.3 +/- 3.4 vs. 13.0 +/- 4.3 days, P = 0.03). In the amiodarone group, concentrations of amiodarone and desethylamiodarone differed significantly between patients with AF and sinus rhythm (amiodarone: 0.96 +/- 0.5 vs. 0.62 +/- 0.4 microg/mL, P = 0.02; desethylamiodarone: 0.65 +/- 0.2 vs. 0.48 +/- 0.1 microg/mL, P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

The incidence of post-operative AF among high-risk patients was significantly reduced by a prophylactic amiodarone treatment resulting in a shorter time of intensive care unit and hospital stay. Our data supports the prophylactic use of amiodarone in peri-operative period in patients at high risk for AF after CABG.

Safety of amiodarone in the prevention of postoperative atrial fibrillation: A meta-analysis

PURPOSE

A meta-analysis was conducted to assess the safety of amiodarone in the prevention of postoperative atrial fibrillation.

METHODS

A search of the medical literature was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials of prophylactic amiodarone use in cardiothoracic surgery. Studies were independently reviewed by three investigators and selected for inclusion if they met the following three criteria: (1) randomized controlled trial of amiodarone versus placebo or routine treatment, (2) patients underwent coronary artery bypass graft or valvular surgery, and (3) reported data on the frequency of at least one of the following safety endpoints: bradycardia, hypotension, heart block, nausea, cerebral vascular accident, myocardial infarction, and death. Both random- and fixed-effects models were used to determine any significant associations between amiodarone and safety endpoints.

RESULTS

Eighteen trials were analyzed. A total of 3408 patients were enrolled in these trials (1736 received amiodarone and 1672 received placebo). Amiodarone increased the odds of developing bradycardia (odds ratio [OR], 1.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-2.74) and hypotension (OR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.04-2.54). The administration of i.v. amiodarone, an average daily dose exceeding 1 g, and postoperative amiodarone administration were each associated with a greater likelihood of hemodynamic adverse effects. Amiodarone did not appear to affect other safety endpoints.

CONCLUSION

Meta-analysis showed amiodarone to be associated with an increased risk of developing bradycardia and hypotension when used for the prophylaxis of postoperative atrial fibrillation. The greatest risk in the occurrence of these adverse events arose when using regimens containing i.v. amiodarone, initiating prophylaxis during the postoperative period, and using regimens with average daily doses exceeding 1 g.

Effect of Prophylactic Amiodarone on Clinical and Economic Outcomes After Cardiothoracic Surgery: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND:

Two previous meta-analyses of amiodarone for prevention of postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) after cardiothoracic surgery did not evaluate total hospital cost, concluded that data on stroke are incomplete, and did not evaluate the effect of clinical heterogeneity between trials.

OBJECTIVE:

To conduct a meta-analysis examining amiodarone's prophylactic impact on cardiothoracic surgery POAF, length of stay (LOS), stroke, and total costs.

METHODS:

Three reviewers conducted a systematic literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library (1966–September 2004%). Studies were included if they met the following criteria: (1%) randomized controlled trial versus placebo/routine treatment, (2%) coronary artery bypass graft and/or valvular surgery, (3%) Jadad score ≥3, (4%) reported data on incidence of POAF or stroke, LOS, or total costs, (5%) used electrocardiographic/Holter monitoring, and (6%) monitored subjects for ≥2 days. A random-effects model was utilized. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted.

RESULTS:

Fifteen trials were identified, including 1512 and 1429 patients in the amiodarone and control groups, respectively. Amiodarone reduced POAF (OR 0.50; 95% CI 0.42 to 0.60%) and decreased stroke (n = 8 studies), LOS (n = 10%), and total costs (n = 6%) (OR 0.47; 95% CI 0.23 to 0.96; −0.73 days, 95% CI −0.95 to −0.51; and –$1619, 95% CI −3395 to 156, respectively). Surgery type, β-blocker use, route of administration, use of a fixed-effects model, or exclusion of unblinded/unpublished studies did not affect the overall results. No statistical heterogeneity was observed for any endpoint evaluated (p > 0.22 for all comparisons).

CONCLUSIONS:

Prophylactic treatment with amiodarone decreases patients' risk of POAF and stroke while reducing LOS.

Epidemiology, Mechanisms, and Risks

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the most frequent complications of cardiac surgery, affecting more than one third of patients. The mechanism of this arrhythmia is believed to be reentry. The electrophysiologic substrate may be preexisting or may develop due to heterogeneity of refractoriness after surgery. Multiple perioperative factors have been proposed to contribute to the latter, including operative trauma, inflammation, elevations in atrial pressure (including that due to left ventricular diastolic dysfunction), autonomic nervous system imbalance, metabolic and electrolyte imbalances, or myocardial ischemic damage incurred during the operation. Whether ectopic beats originating in the pulmonary veins explain at least some episodes of postoperative AF, as has been shown for nonsurgical patients with the arrhythmia, is of current interest as such sites could easily be isolated at the time of surgery. The development of postoperative AF is associated with a higher risk of operative morbidity, prolonged hospitalization, and increased hospital cost compared with that in patients remaining in sinus rhythm. Many factors have been identified as being associated with postoperative AF, but the most consistent variable across studies is increasing patient age. It is speculated that age-related pathologic changes in the atrium contribute to arrhythmia susceptibility. An important modifiable risk factor for postoperative AF is the failure to resume therapy with beta-adrenergic receptor blockers after surgery. The stratification of patients who are at higher risk for AF would focus preventative strategies on patients who are most likely to benefit from such therapy. Nonetheless, since postoperative AF often develops in patients with comorbidities who are predisposed to other complications and prolonged hospitalization, it is presently unclear whether the prevention of postoperative AF will result in improved patient outcomes, particularly shorter hospitalizations.

Pharmacologic Prophylaxis

New-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) occurs frequently in patients after cardiac surgery. The purpose of this study was to review the published trials and to provide clinical practice guidelines for pharmacologic prophylaxis against postoperative AF. Trials of pharmacologic prophylaxis against AF after heart surgery were identified by searching MEDLINE, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, and the bibliographies of published reports. Evidence grades and clinical recommendation scores were assigned to each prophylactic drug based on published evidence. Ninety-one trials were identified. The primary study design was a randomized, controlled trial of one drug vs placebo/usual care. Pharmacologic therapies that are reviewed include Vaughan-Williams class II agents (ie, beta-receptor antagonists) [29 trials; 2,901 patients], Vaughan-Williams class III agents (ie, sotalol and amiodarone) [18 trials; 2,978 patients], Vaughan-Williams class IV agents (ie, verapamil and diltiazem) [5 trials; 601 patients], and Vaughan-Williams class I agents (ie, quinidine and procainamide) [3 trials; 246 patients], as well as digitalis (10 trials; 1,401 patients), magnesium (14 trials; 1,853 patients), dexamethasone (1 trial; 216 patients), glucose-insulin-potassium (3 trials; 102 patients), insulin (1 trial; 501 patients), triiodothyronine (2 trials; 301 patients), and aniline (1 trial; 32 patients). A consistent finding in this review is that antiarrhythmic drugs with beta-adrenergic receptor-blocking effects (ie, class II beta-blockers, sotalol, and amiodarone) demonstrated successful prophylaxis. Furthermore, those therapies that did not inhibit beta-receptors generally failed to demonstrate a decreased incidence in postoperative AF. While sotalol and amiodarone have been shown in some studies to be effective, their safety and the incremental prophylactic advantage in comparison with beta-blockers has not been conclusively demonstrated. On the basis of evidence that has been reviewed and graded for quality, it is recommended that strong consideration should be given to the prophylactic administration of Vaughan-Williams class II beta-blocking drugs as a means of lowering the incidence of new-onset post-cardiac surgery AF.

Atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: an evidence-based approach to prevention

A number of advances in surgical and anesthetic techniques have reduced the risk for patients undergoing cardiac surgery. However, postoperative atrial fibrillation remains common, with an incidence ranging between 25% and 40%. It is associated with an increased incidence of congestive heart failure, renal insufficiency, and stroke that prolongs hospitalization and increases rates of readmission after discharge. Consequently, there has been great interest in strategies to prevent this arrhythmia. When both safety and efficacy are considered, the available evidence to date suggests that only beta-blockers can be recommended for the prevention of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. Other treatments might be considered on an individual basis after careful consideration of the patient's potential for side effects.

Hepatotoxicity during rapid intravenous loading with amiodarone: Description of three cases and review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia after cardiac surgery. Amiodarone can effectively prevent and control postoperative atrial and ventricular fibrillation. Acute hepatic damage after intravenous amiodarone, which can be fatal, is not well recognized. We describe three cases of acute hepatocellular injury after intravenous amiodarone administration in critically ill patients. Another 25 published cases and six cases reported to the Swiss Pharmacovigilance Center (Swissmedic) are discussed.

DESIGN

This study consisted of a series of three case reports and review of the literature.

SETTING

: This study was conducted at an operative critical care unit at the University Hospital Basel, Switzerland.

PATIENTS

Three hemodynamically compromised patients after open heart surgery developed significant increases of transaminases (up to more than 100-fold of the upper limit of normal) shortly after the introduction of intravenous amiodarone. INTERVENTIONS AND MEASUREMENT: Cessation of intravenous amiodarone and of other potentially hepatotoxic drugs.

RESULTS

Liver parameters significantly improved or returned to normal in all three patients, even after start of oral amiodarone in two patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Amiodarone is a highly effective antiarrhythmic agent for the treatment and prevention of atrial and ventricular arrhythmias. Acute liver damage after intravenous amiodarone, possibly induced by the solubilizer polysorbate 80, is rare but potentially harmful. Amiodarone loading should therefore be adapted to the necessity of an immediate effect of the drug, and liver function should be monitored closely in critically ill patients. Oral maintenance therapy with amiodarone is possible, even in patients who developed liver disease during intravenous loading.

Pharmacologic Strategies for Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation After Open Heart Surgery

Postoperative atrial fibrillation is a common complication after open heart surgery; it increases morbidity, hospital stay, and costs. In an analysis of 8 large cardiac surgery trials totaling 20,193 patients, the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation was estimated to be 26% and ranged from 17% to 35%. We reviewed the results of 52 studies published between 1966 and 2003 that evaluated pharmacologic strategies to prevent postoperative atrial fibrillation in nearly 10,000 patients undergoing open heart operations. Supraventricular tachyarrhythmias, including atrial fibrillation, after open heart operations occurred in 29% of patients who did not receive prophylactic drugs, compared with 12% in patients who received intravenous followed by oral amiodarone, 15% in those given sotalol, 16% in those given oral amiodarone, and 19% in those given beta-blockers. Pharmacologic strategies and regimens aimed at preventing postoperative atrial fibrillation are necessary to optimize the postoperative care of patients undergoing open heart operations. Although no strategy has consistently been shown to be superior to another, the most effective approach to preventing postoperative atrial fibrillation likely involves multiple interventions. In the absence of contraindications, all patients should receive beta-blocker therapy before and after the operation. For patients with 1 or more risk factors for postoperative atrial fibrillation, regimens consisting of either sotalol (beta-blocker with class III antiarrhythmic properties) alone or beta-blockers in combination with amiodarone seem to be the safest, most effective pharmacologic strategies for preventing postoperative atrial fibrillation.

Selective Use of Amiodarone and Early Cardioversion for Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Postoperative atrial fibrillation (AF) occurs in 20%-40% of patients undergoing open-heart surgery. Numerous pharmacological and electrical therapies have been used as a prophylaxis to prevent this dysrhythmia. The purpose of this study was to examine the selective use of amiodarone and early cardioversion (CVN) postoperatively to restore normal sinus rhythm (NSR).

METHODS

A retrospective nonrandomized review of patients who received amiodarone and early electrical CVN (study group) for postoperative AF after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) were compared with patients who received nonamiodarone therapies (control group). The study group received 150 mg of amiodarone bolus intravenously and thereafter received an infusion of 1 g over a 24-hour period. If NSR was established within 24 hours, then the intravenous (IV) infusion was continued for another 24 hours with concomitant oral amiodarone overlap. If NSR was not established within 24 hours, then external electrical CVN was performed. After 48 hours, the IV infusion was discontinued and the oral regimen maintained through discharge. Control group patients received either combination digoxin and procainamide or diltiazem. Postoperative beta-blocker administration was instituted in all patients.

RESULTS

Six-hundred forty consecutive CABG patients were examined between July 1995 and June 2003. Postoperative AF developed in 160 of these patients (25%). One-hundred patients constituted the study group and 60 patients represented the control group. Restoration of NSR within 24 and 48 hours occurred in 79 (79%) and 90 patients (90%) for the study group, respectively, compared with 38 (64%) and 44 patients (73%) for the control group, respectively. The presence of NSR at discharge was achieved in 98 study patients (98%) and 50 control patients (83%). The length of stay (LOS) for the study and control patients was 7.4 and 9.1 days, respectively. There was no mortality in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

Amiodarone and early CVN was more effective than nonamiodarone therapies with regard to restoring NSR for patients in whom AF developed after elective CABG. A trend toward a decrease in LOS was observed in the study group, but was not statistically significant. The overall LOS using amiodarone therapy with early CVN was similar to postoperative AF for patients in whom the condition did not develop.

Pharmacological management of atrial fibrillation following cardiac surgery

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common complication following coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). Post-CABG AF occurs most commonly on the second postoperative day and declines in incidence thereafter. A number of risk factors have been found to be associated with a higher frequency of post-CABG AF. These risk factors include advanced age, a prior history of AF, hypertension, and heart failure. Postoperative complications--including low cardiac output, use of an intra-aortic balloon pump, pneumonia, and prolonged mechanical ventilation--are also associated with higher rates of post-CABG AF. Post-CABG AF increases the risk of stroke, and the length and cost of hospitalization. Prophylactic administration of conventional beta-adrenoceptor antagonists (beta-blockers) or sotalol produces a consistent and significant reduction in the incidence of post-CABG AF; however, results with prophylactic amiodarone or magnesium are less consistent. Termination of post-CABG AF, once it occurs, can be accomplished with a number of antiarrhythmic agents. Ibutilide has been the most widely studied agent for this indication. Sotalol is not indicated for cardioversion of AF and has not been studied in the post-CABG setting. Electrical cardioversion and biatrial pacing have also been used to terminate post-CABG AF. Ventricular rate is best controlled with beta-blockers and calcium channel antagonists. Esmolol has a rapid onset of action and is easily titrated to effect. Digoxin can control the ventricular rate, but has a slow onset of action. There are limited data available to guide decisions regarding the optimal management of post-CABG AF.

Interventions for preventing post-operative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing heart surgery

BACKGROUND

Post-operative atrial fibrillation is a common complication of cardiac surgery and has been associated with increased incidence of other complications including post-operative stroke, increased hospital length of stay and increased cost of hospitalisation. Prevention of atrial fibrillation is a reasonable clinical goal and, consequently, many randomised trials have evaluated the effectiveness of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions. We systematically reviewed the literature and prepared meta-analyses to better understand the role and effects of various prophylactic therapies against post-operative atrial fibrillation.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for preventing post-cardiac surgery atrial fibrillation.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL from earliest achievable date to June 2003. We hand searched references from reports and earlier reviews. We searched abstract books and CD-ROMs from annual scientific meetings of American College of Cardiology, American Heart Association, North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology and European Heart Organization between 1997-2003. No language restrictions were applied.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing pharmacological interventions or non-pharmacological interventions with control treatment, placebo or usual care for the prevention of post-operative atrial fibrillation in post-coronary artery bypass grafting or combined CABG and valvular surgery.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers assessed trial quality and extracted data. Study authors were contacted for additional information.

MAIN RESULTS

Fifty eight studies were included with a total of 8565 participants. Interventions included were amiodarone, beta blockers, solatol and pacing. Results favoured treatment for post-operative atrial fibrillation. The data for stroke favoured treatment by a non-significant effect size of 0.81, 95% confidence interval 0.51 to 1.28. Similarly, a positive indication for length of stay was derived but it too was not significant with a weighted mean difference of -0.66, 95% confidence interval -0.95 to -0.37. A positive result for cost of hospitalisation in favour of treatment was achieved, but the statistic is not significant due to low power and large standard deviations: a weighted mean difference of -2717, 95% confidence interval 7518 to 2084. Beta-blockers had the greatest magnitude of effect across 28 trials (4074 patients) with an odds ratio (random) of 0.35, 95% confidence interval 0.26 to 0.49. Across all treatment, the odds ratio favoured treatment with a ratio (random) of 0.43, 95% confidence interval 0.37 to 0.51.

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

Intervention is favoured across the three pharmacological interventions studied and the one non-pharmacological intervention, pacing. The length of stay data favoured treatment (-0.66, 95% confidence interval -0.95 to -0.37).

Amiodarone versus sotalol for the treatment of atrial fibrillation after open heart surgery: the Reduction in Postoperative Cardiovascular Arrhythmic Events (REDUCE) trial

OBJECTIVES

This prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study compared the efficacy and safety of amiodarone and sotalol in the prevention of atrial fibrillation (AF) following open heart surgery.

BACKGROUND

The incidence of supraventricular arrhythmias following open heart surgery ranges from 20% to 40%, with AF being the most common. Both amiodarone and sotalol have been shown to be effective in reducing postoperative arrhythmias, but no direct comparison of these agents has been conducted.

METHODS

A total of 160 patients were randomized, of whom 134 underwent coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) alone, 17 underwent CABG and concomitant aortic valve replacement surgery (AVR), 9 underwent AVR only, and 1 patient's surgery was canceled. Patients with signs or symptoms of congestive heart failure (CHF), ejection fraction < or =30%, estimated creatinine clearance <30 mL/min, or serum creatinine > or =2.5 mg/dL were excluded. Patients were randomized to receive either sotalol 80 mg 2 times per day (n = 76) or intravenous amiodarone 15 mg/kg over 24 hours followed by oral amiodarone 200 mg 3 times per day (n = 83). Study drug was started at the time of surgery and continued for 7 days or until discharge, whichever came first.

RESULTS

AF occurred in 17% of patients randomized to amiodarone and 25% of the patients randomized to sotalol (P =.21). However, the duration of AF was significantly shorter in amiodarone-treated patients (169 +/- 224 min) compared to sotalol treated patients (487 +/- 505 min; P =.04). In a subgroup analysis, the incidence of AF in patients undergoing AVR or CABG with AVR was significantly less with amiodarone (1/15, 7%) compared to sotalol (9/11, 82%) (P <.001). Blood pressure was lower immediately after surgery with amiodarone but comparable to sotalol at 24 hours. Of the hemodynamic indices measured, only stroke volume was significantly lower in patients randomized to sotalol at 24 hours (P =.035).

CONCLUSIONS

Amiodarone and sotalol share similar efficacy and safety in reducing postoperative AF. Hemodynamic effects were similar between both drugs at 24 hours, with the exception that stroke volume was lower in sotalol-treated patients. In patients undergoing more complex surgery, postoperative AF occurred more frequently with sotalol than with amiodarone.