Treatment effects of eptifibatide in planned coronary stent implantation in patients with chronic kidney disease (ESPRIT Trial)

Cardiac Catheter Laboratory Based Computer Generated Bivalirudin/Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Flow Sheet

Bivalirudin and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists are commonly used during percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). The Pharmacy Department of Charlton Memorial Hospital implemented a dosing flow sheet that is operated by the Cardiac Catheter Lab nursing staff. The computer-oriented program utilizes the Microsoft Excel spreadsheet program. The computer spreadsheet calculates an estimated creatinine clearance (CrCl) rate and inserts proper renal adjusted dosages of both bivalirudin and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists into a printed flow sheet. The computer program is encoded to follow specific medication regimens for patients whether or not they are on dialysis. Institutions can develop medication dosing flow-sheet forms utilizing the spreadsheet concept.

Management of antithrombotic agents in patients undergoing flexible bronchoscopy

Bleeding is one of the most feared complications of flexible bronchoscopy. Although infrequent, it can be catastrophic and result in fatal outcomes. Compared to other endoscopic procedures, the risk of morbidity and mortality from the bleeding is increased, as even a small amount of blood can fill the tracheobronchial tree and lead to respiratory failure. Patients using antithrombotic agents (ATAs) have higher bleeding risk. A thorough understanding of the different ATAs is critical to manage patients during the peri-procedural period. A decision to stop an ATA before bronchoscopy should take into account a variety of factors, including indication for its use and the type of procedure. This article serves as a detailed review on the different ATAs, their pharmacokinetics and the pre- and post-bronchoscopy management of patients receiving these medications.

Treatment of non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction and ST-elevation myocardial infarction in patients with chronic kidney disease

Renal dysfunction is frequent in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS). Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with very poor prognosis and is an independent predictor of early and late mortality and major bleeding in patients with NSTE-ACS. Patients with NSTE-ACS and CKD are still rarely treated according to guidelines. Medical registers reveal that patients with CKD are usually treated with too high doses of antithrombotics, especially anticoagulants and inhibitors of platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptors, and therefore they are more prone to bleeding. Drugs which are excreted mainly or exclusively by the kidney should be administered in a reduced dose or discontinued in patients with CKD. These drugs include enoxaparin, fondaparinux, bivalirudin, and small molecule inhibitors of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors. In long-term treatment of patients after myocardial infarction, anti-platelet therapy, lipid-lowering therapy and β-blockers are used. Chronic kidney disease patients before qualification for coronary interventions should be carefully selected in order to avoid their use in the group of patients who could not benefit from such procedures. This paper presents schemes of non-ST and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treatment in CKD patients in accordance with the current recommendations of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).

Managing cardiovascular risk in people with chronic kidney disease: a review of the evidence from randomized controlled trials

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death and morbidity in people with chronic kidney disease (CKD) making measures to modify cardiovascular risk a clinical priority. The relationship between risk factors and cardiovascular outcomes is often substantially different in people with CKD compared with the general population, leading to uncertainty around pathophysiological mechanisms and the validity of generalizations from the general population. Furthermore, published reports of subgroup analyses from clinical trials have suggested that a range of interventions may have different effects in people with kidney disease compared with those with normal kidney function. There is a relative scarcity of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted in CKD populations, and most such trials are small and underpowered. As a result, evidence to support cardiovascular risk modification measures for people with CKD is largely derived from small trials and post hoc analyses of RCTs conducted in the general population. In this review, we examine the available RCT evidence on interventions aimed at preventing cardiovascular events in people with kidney disease to identify beneficial treatments as well as current gaps in knowledge that should be a priority for future research.

Antiplatelet drugs: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines

The article describes the mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of aspirin, dipyridamole, cilostazol, the thienopyridines, and the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists. The relationships among dose, efficacy, and safety are discussed along with a mechanistic overview of results of randomized clinical trials. The article does not provide specific management recommendations but highlights important practical aspects of antiplatelet therapy, including optimal dosing, the variable balance between benefits and risks when antiplatelet therapies are used alone or in combination with other antiplatelet drugs in different clinical settings, and the implications of persistently high platelet reactivity despite such treatment.

Adjusting Eptifibatide Doses for Renal Impairment: A Model of Dosing Agreement Among Various Methods of Estimating Creatinine Clearance

Background:

Because of the renal elimination and increased risk for bleeding events at supratherapeutic doses of eptifibatide, the manufacturer recommends dosing adjustment in patients with renal dysfunction. Methods commonly used to estimate renal dysfunction in hospital settings may be inconsistent with those studied and recommended by the manufacturer

Objective:

To compare hypothetical renal dosing adjustments of eptifibatide using both the recommended method and several other commonly used formulas for estimating kidney function.

Methods:

Sex, age, weight, height, serum creatinine, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were obtained retrospectively from the records of patients who received eptifibatide during a 12-month period. Renal dosing decisions were determined for each patient based on creatinine clearance (CrCI) estimates via the Cockcroft-Gault formula (CG) with actual body weight (ABW), ideal body weight (IBW) or adjusted weight (ADJW), and eGFR from the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula. Percent agreement and Cohen κ were calculated comparing dosing decisions for each formula to the standard CG-ABW.

Results:

In this analysis of 179 patients, percent agreement as compared to CG-ABW varied (CG-IBW: 90.50%, CG-ADJW: 95.53%, and eGFR: 93.30%). All κ coefficients were categorized as good. In the 20% of patients receiving an adjusted dose by any of the methods, 68.6% could have received a dose different from that determined using the CG-ABW formula.

Conclusions:

In the patients with renal impairment (CrCI <50 mL/min) in this study, two thirds would have received an unnecessary 50% dose adjustment discordant from the manufacturer's recommendation. Because failure to adjust eptifibatide doses in patients with renal impairment has led to increased bleeding events, practitioners may be inclined to err on the side of caution. However, studies have shown that suboptimal doses of eptifibatide lead to suboptimal outcomes. Therefore, correct dosing of eptifibatide is important to both patient safety and efficacy.

Safety and efficacy of antiplatelet and antithrombotic therapy in acute coronary syndrome patients with chronic kidney disease

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is prevalent and affects an ever-increasing proportion of patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Patients with CKD have a higher risk of ACS and significantly higher mortality, and are also predisposed to increased bleeding complications. Antiplatelet and antithrombotic drugs form the bedrock of management of patients with ACS. Most randomized trials of these drugs exclude patients with CKD, and current guidelines for management of these patients are largely based on these trials. We aim to review the safety and efficacy of these drugs in patients with CKD presenting with ACS.

Incidence of bleeding in renally impaired patients receiving incorrectly dosed eptifibatide or bivalirudin while undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND

Limited data are available regarding adverse bleeding events associated with antithrombotic agents incorrectly dosed based on renal function in patients receiving percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

OBJECTIVE

To compare the incidence of bleeding during their hospital stay in patients with reduced renal function receiving incorrect doses of bivalirudin or eptifibatide to the incidence of correct doses, based on manufacturer recommendations; secondary objectives were to determine the incidence of correct dosing based on manufacturer recommendations and the incidence of TIMI (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction) major bleeding.

METHODS

A chart review over a 32-month period showed that patients with reduced renal function who received either eptifibatide or bivalirudin during PCI were evaluated for correct dosing based on manufacturer recommendations, bleeding incidence according to the TIMI criteria, and extent of bleeding according to the TIMI and GUSTO (Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries) criteria.

RESULTS

One hundred ninety patients met inclusion criteria, 56 who received eptifibatide and 134 who received bivalirudin. Eptifibatide was dosed incorrectly in 64% of the patients. Patients receiving incorrectly dosed compared to correctly dosed eptifibatide experienced significantly more bleeding (64% vs 35%, respectively, p = 0.04), a greater extent of bleeding based on the TIMI and GUSTO criteria (p = 0.03 and p = 0.009, respectively), and had more TIMI major bleeding (19% vs 5%, respectively). Bivalirudin was dosed incorrectly in 28% of the patients. Patients receiving incorrectly dosed compared to correctly dosed bivalirudin experienced a significantly greater extent of bleeding based on the GUSTO criteria (p = 0.01). There was no significant difference between the incidence of bleeding (37% vs 21%, respectively; p = 0.06), extent of bleeding based on the TIMI criteria (p = 0.058), or incidence of TIMI major bleeding (5% vs 3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients receiving incorrectly dosed eptifibatide and bivalirudin are susceptible to adverse bleeding events. The occurrence of incorrect dosing offers an opportunity for pharmacist-driven institutional improvement.

[Chronic renal failure is associated with worse outcome after implantation of sirolimus eluting stent]

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Chronic renal failure (CRF) is an emergent pathology in industrialized countries and is associated with high prevalence of coronary artery disease. Our aim is to determine the influence of CRF in the appearance of adverse cardiovascular events after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation in a non selected cohort.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Observational retrospective study with a cohort of 461 patients who received one or more sirolimus-eluting stent between September 2002 and December 2005 at our institution. We evaluated the incidence of adverse cardiovascular events during the follow-up period and their relation with chronic kidney disease. We used the abbreviated Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation to calculate the GFR.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 42 months (SD ± 13) and the mean age was 61 ± 11 years and 85 percent of the group were men. Chronic renal failure was present in 50 patients, 11 percent of the cohort. In a multivariate model, after adjustment for age, sex, left ventricle election fraction, anemia, diabetes, hypertension, Killip class and stent thrombosis, chronic renal failure was an independent predictive factor of death from any cause (hazard ratio, 3.82; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.41-10.33, p = 0.008), and an significant risk factor for restenosis (hazard ratio 3.47; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.01-11.97, p = 0.045). Significant differences were not found in thrombosis between patients with or without CRF (8% vs 3.4%, p = 0,109), although a trend was observed in the CRF group. There no were statistical association with need for a new target vessel revascularization (TVR) after coronary intervention either (18.8% versus 10.5%, p = 0.094).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of chronic renal failure in patients with coronary disease is associated with higher risk of restenosis and is a potent predictor of mortality after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation.

Use of drug-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease and renal insufficiency

Renal insufficiency (RI) has been shown to be associated with increased major adverse cardiovascular events after percutaneous coronary intervention. We reviewed the impact of RI on the pathogenesis of coronary artery disease and outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention in the form of drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in these high-risk patients. We searched the English-language literature indexed in MEDLINE, Scopus, and EBSCO Host research databases from 1990 through January 2009, using as search terms coronary revascularization, drug-eluting stent, and renal insufficiency. Studies that assessed DES implantation in patients with various degrees of RI were selected for review. Most of the available data were extracted from observational studies, and data from randomized trials formed the basis of a post hoc analysis. The outcomes after coronary revascularization were less favorable in patients with RI than in those with normal renal function. In patients with RI, DES implantation yielded better outcomes than did use of bare-metal stents. Randomized trials are needed to define optimal treatment of these high-risk patients with coronary artery disease.

Impact of chronic kidney disease on early (30-day) and late (1-year) outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes treated with alternative antithrombotic treatment strategies: an ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage strategY) substudy

OBJECTIVES

In this substudy of the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage strategY) trial, we investigated the relationship between chronic kidney disease (CKD) and clinical outcomes, and compared the safety and efficacy of bivalirudin monotherapy versus heparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (GPI).

BACKGROUND

CKD is an important predictor of prognosis in the general population. The outcomes of patients with CKD and acute coronary syndromes (ACS) have not been well studied.

METHODS

In the ACUITY study, 13,819 patients with moderate- and high-risk ACS undergoing an early, invasive strategy were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 antithrombin regimens: a heparin plus a GPI, bivalirudin plus a GPI, or bivalirudin monotherapy. CKD (creatinine clearance <60 ml/min) was present in 2,469 (19.1%) of 12,939 randomized patients with baseline creatinine clearance data.

RESULTS

Patients with CKD had worse 30-day and 1-year clinical outcomes than those with normal renal function. There were no significant differences between bivalirudin monotherapy and heparin plus a GPI in rates of 30-day composite ischemia (11.1% vs. 9.4%, p = 0.27) and net clinical adverse outcomes (16.1% vs. 16.9%, p = 0.65). There was remarkably less major bleeding (6.2% vs. 9.8%, p = 0.008) at 30 days, but no significant difference in 1-year composite ischemia (22.0% vs. 18.9%, p = 0.10) or mortality (7.1% vs. 7.3%, p = 0.96).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with ACS, CKD is associated with higher 30-day and 1-year adverse event rates. Compared with heparin plus a GPI, the use of bivalirudin monotherapy in patients with CKD results in nonstatistically different ischemic outcomes, but significantly less 30-day major bleeding.

Coronary stent thrombosis in patients with chronic renal insufficiency

Renal insufficiency (RI) is a strong predictor of unfavorable outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). After PCI, stent thrombosis (ST) is a considerable concern. The risk of ST in RI has not been independently evaluated before. The mechanism of ST is frequently related to dual antiplatelet underuse. We reviewed the publications listed on Medline, Scopus, and EBSCO Host research database in the last two decades to identify the risk of ST in patients with RI. There are no enough data on the incidence of ST in RI patients. Platelet reactivity, appropriate period of dual antiplatelet therapy, coronary anatomy, selection of stent, and patient compliance are vital issues that warrant detailed evaluation in RI patients. Moreover, prospective trials and new therapeutic strategies are needed for proper assessment and management of ST in high-risk patients.

The scope of coronary heart disease in patients with chronic kidney disease

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) affects approximately 13% of the U.S. population and is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular complications. Once renal replacement therapy became available, it became apparent that the mode of death of patients with advanced CKD was more likely than not related to cardiovascular compromise. Further observation revealed that such compromise was related to myocardial disease (related to hypertension, stiff vessels, coronary heart disease, or uremic toxins). Early on, the excess of cardiovascular events was attributed to accelerated atherosclerosis, inadequate control of blood pressure, lipids, or inflammatory cytokines, or perhaps poor glycemia control. In more recent times, outcome research has given us further information that relates even lesser degrees of renal compromise to an excess of cardiovascular events in the general population and in those with already present atherosclerotic disease. As renal function deteriorates, certain physiologic changes occur (perhaps due to hemodynamic, inflammatory, or metabolic changes) that decrease oxygen-carrying capacity of the blood by virtue of anemia, make blood vessels stiffer by altering collagen or through medial calcinosis, raise the blood pressure, increase shearing stresses, or alter the constituents of atherosclerotic plaque or the balance of thrombogenesis and thrombolysis. At further levels of renal dysfunction, tangible metabolic perturbations are recognized as requiring specific therapy to reduce complications (such as for anemia and hyperparathyroidism), although outcome research to support some of our current guidelines is sorely lacking. Understanding the process by which renal dysfunction alters the prognosis of cardiac disease might lead to further methods of treatment. This review will outline the relationship of CKD to coronary heart disease with respect to the current understanding of the traditional and nontraditional risk factors, the role of various imaging modalities, and the impact of coronary revascularization on outcome.

[Myocardial revascularization in patients with chronic renal failure]

The incidence of chronic renal failure has increased in the last years in industrialized countries. In Spain the prevalence of this pathology is estimated at 10-12% of the population, and the stages III-V of the disease, corresponding to the estimated glomerular filtration rate less than 60 ml/min/m2, represent the 5%. From the cardiovascular point of view, both chronic and acute coronary syndrome is a very important subgroup of patients because of the increased association between chronic renal failure and coronary artery disease. In fact, ACS is the main cause of death in patients with advanced chronic renal failure. Frequently, this kind of patients are excluded from prospective randomized clinical trials, consequently scientific evidence is not available to guide the therapy of coronary revascularization.

Use of Low Molecular Weight Heparins and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease

Despite aggressive intervention, cardiac causes of death, including acute coronary syndrome (ACS), continue to be a major source of mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), including end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Multiple large prospective trials have demonstrated the clinical benefits of both low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and glycoprotein (Gp) IIb/IIIa inhibitors in treating patients with ACS. Unfortunately patients with significant impairment of kidney function have generally been excluded from these major clinical trials. Consequently relatively little is known about the pharmacokinetics, appropriate dosing, efficacy, and safety of these medications in patients with CKD of various stages. This article examines the available literature regarding the pharmacokinetics, dosing, efficacy, and safety of LMWH and Gp IIb/IIIa inhibitors in patients with CKD.

Risks and benefits of antiplatelet therapy in uremic patients

Patients with renal insufficiency are at an increased risk for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Despite being at a substantial risk for thrombotic events, patients with renal insufficiency also experience a greater number of hemorrhagic complications associated with antiplatelet therapy than individuals with normal renal function. This review focuses on the benefits and risks of antiplatelet therapy in patients with impaired kidney function suffering from an acute coronary syndrome.

Antiplatelet drugs: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition)

This article about currently available antiplatelet drugs is part of the Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). It describes the mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of aspirin, reversible cyclooxygenase inhibitors, thienopyridines, and integrin alphaIIbbeta3 receptor antagonists. The relationships among dose, efficacy, and safety are thoroughly discussed, with a mechanistic overview of randomized clinical trials. The article does not provide specific management recommendations; however, it does highlight important practical aspects related to antiplatelet therapy, including the optimal dose of aspirin, the variable balance of benefits and hazards in different clinical settings, and the issue of interindividual variability in response to antiplatelet drugs.

Management of ischemic heart disease in patients with chronic kidney disease

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and ischemic heart disease (IHD) have strikingly high mortality rates. In the general population, there has been a reduction in the mortality and morbidity rates for IHD through the implementation of effective risk-factor-reduction programs and better interventions for patients with established IHD. No such trend has been observed in patients with end-stage kidney disease. This review article addresses the following topics: (i) epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical CKD patients with IHD; (ii) diagnostic modalities for IHD and their limitation in CKD patients; (iii) medical treatment options and revascularization strategies for these high-risk patients; and (iv) optimal cardiovascular risk management. Generally, in CKD patients with IHD an aggressive approach to IHD is warranted, a low threshold for diagnostic testing should be employed, and awaiting a clinical trial targeting these patients they should be considered for all proven strategies to improve outcomes.

Morbidity, mortality and economic burden of renal impairment in cardiac intensive care

BACKGROUND

Moderate to severe impairment of renal function has emerged as a potent risk factor for adverse short- and long-term outcomes among patients presenting with cardiac disease.

AIMS

We sought to define the clinical, late mortality and economic burden of this risk factor among patients presenting to cardiac intensive care.

METHODS

A clinical audit of patients presenting to cardiac intensive care was undertaken between July 2002 and June 2003. All patients presenting with cardiac diagnoses were included in the study. Baseline creatinine levels were assessed in all patients. Late mortality was assessed by the interrogation of the National Death Register. Renal impairment was defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min per 1.73 m2, as calculated by the Modified Diet in Renal Disease formula. In-hospital and late outcomes were compared by Cox proportional hazards modelling, adjusting for known confounders. A matched analysis and attributable risk calculation were undertaken to assess the proportion of late mortality accounted for by impairment of renal function and other known negative prognostic factors. The in-hospital total cost associated with renal impairment was assessed by linear regression.

RESULTS

Glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min per 1.73 m2 was evident in 33.0% of this population. Among these patients, in-hospital and late mortality were substantially increased: risk ratio 13.2; 95% CI 3.0-58.1; P < 0.001 and hazard ratio 6.2; 95% CI 3.6-10.7; P < 0.001, respectively. In matched analysis, renal impairment to this level was associated with 42.1% of all the late deaths observed. Paradoxically, patients with renal impairment were more conservatively managed, but their hospitalizations were associated with an excess adjusted in-hospital cost of $A1676.

CONCLUSION

Impaired renal function is associated with a striking clinical and economic burden among patients presenting to cardiac intensive care. As a marker for future risk, renal function accounts for a substantial proportion of the burden of late mortality. The burden of risk suggests a greater potential opportunity for improvement of outcomes through optimisation of therapeutic strategies.

Chronic kidney disease in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes

PURPOSE

Chronic kidney disease has been linked to high mortality rates in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction but has not been well described for patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. We examined the treatment and outcomes of patients with both non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes and moderate to severe chronic kidney disease.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

We evaluated 45343 patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes enrolled in the CRUSADE Quality Improvement Initiative and compared treatments and outcomes in patients with and without moderate to severe chronic kidney disease.

RESULTS

Patients presenting with moderate to severe chronic kidney disease (n = 6560) were older, more often diabetic, and more likely to present with signs of congestive heart failure. Adherence to Class IA/IB guidelines recommendations was lower in patients with moderate to severe chronic kidney disease, who were significantly less likely to be treated with medications, undergo invasive cardiac procedures, and be given discharge counseling. Moderate to severe chronic kidney disease was associated with a 50% increased risk of mortality and a 70% increased likelihood of transfusion. Despite having a higher risk of adverse outcomes, patients with moderate to severe chronic kidney disease were treated less aggressively than patients with normal renal function.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that, in patients with moderate to severe chronic kidney disease, safety concerns about adverse outcomes and the absence of trial data for this population may limit the use of guidelines-recommended therapies and interventions for non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. The decreased use of discharge counseling in patients with moderate to severe chronic kidney disease and non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes may represent therapeutic nihilism.

Therapy Insight: how changes in renal function with increasing age affect cardiovascular drug prescribing

Age is well recognized as a powerful prognostic factor in the setting of cardiovascular disease. With the aging of the US population, it is projected that more than 50 million people will be aged over 65 years by the year 2020. This growing elderly population has increased rates of morbidity and mortality owing to cardiovascular disease; however, proven therapies for prevention and treatment are often underused in older patients, largely because physicians perceive them as being frail and have limited understanding of age-related unique adverse and therapeutic effects. Advancing age is associated with a number of physiologic and pathophysiologic changes that impact the toxic effects, efficacy and dosing of many medications. Decreases in lean muscle mass affect the volume of distribution, and reductions in hepatic function affect the metabolism of many medications. Age-related reductions in renal function might have the most profound impact on the safety profile and dosing of medications in elderly patients. The strong association between renal and cardiovascular disease makes recognition of renal dysfunction and appropriate dose adjustment particularly important in elderly patients with cardiovascular disease. This article reviews current approaches to the estimation of renal function, and unique considerations related to prescribing medication for elderly patients with concomitant renal and cardiovascular disease.

Coronary artery disease and peripheral vascular disease in chronic kidney disease: an epidemiological perspective

The enormous burden of CAD and PVD inpatients who have CKD contributes substantially to increased morbidity and mortality. The increased risk of vascular disease observed in CKD patients is likely to be multifactorial, with contributions from traditional and nontraditional cardiovascular factors. Given the overwhelming evidence on the known benefits of cardioprotective medications, their underuse remains puzzling in a population at enormous risk. During the past 5 years, the research community and national interest groups have made significant progress in organizing a concerted approach to improve the management of patients who have CKD and vascular disease. Much work remains to be done. The development of national guidelines in the management of these patients at high risk for future cardiovascular events will be a welcome step. The evaluation of multitargeted interventions for reduction of cardiovascular risk through randomized clinical trials is desperately needed. Finally, the low use of known cardioprotective strategies in this high-risk group is a serious issue and warrants immediate attention at local and national levels.

Impact of renal insufficiency on outcome after contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND

End-stage renal failure is associated with poor outcomes, including increased mortality, after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The effect of milder degrees of renal insufficiency (RI) is less clear, especially with routine stenting and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor therapy, which may be of particular benefit in patients with RI.

METHODS

Clinical, angiographic, procedural, and outcome variables of 7769 consecutive patients who underwent PCI between April 2000 and July 2004 were entered into a prospective database. Inhospital mortality and morbidity were calculated according to baseline creatinine clearance. Simple and multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to determine independent predictors of mortality.

RESULTS

Baseline creatinine clearance was available in 6840 patients. It was normal (> 80 mL/min) in 3474; 1670 had mild RI (61-80 mL/min), 1111 moderate RI (41-60 mL/min), and 585 severe RI (< or = 40 mL/min). Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (death/myocardial infarction/revascularization) increased substantially with worsening renal function (2.4% vs 3.0% vs 4.8% vs 9.7%, P < .0001), as did mortality (0.3% vs 0.7% vs 1.5% vs 6.0%, P < .0001). Multiple logistic regression analysis identified moderate RI and severe RI as independent predictors of mortality (odds ratio [OR] 3.9, P < .001; OR 12.7, P < .0001, respectively) and morbidity (MACE) (OR 1.5, P < .05; OR 2.5, P < .0001, respectively). Mild RI trended to increase the risk of mortality but did not reach statistical significance as an independent predictor of inhospital death on multiple regression analysis (OR 2.1, P = .1) and did not increase the risk of MACE (OR 1.1, P = .6).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite routine stenting and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor therapy, RI remains an independent predictor of increased morbidity, and particularly mortality, after PCI. However, the adverse effect of truly mild RI on outcome is limited.

Safety of bivalirudin during percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with abnormal renal function

BACKGROUND

Chronic kidney disease is associated with an increased risk of ischemic and bleeding complications after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Bivalirudin, a direct thrombin inhibitor, has been shown to reduce adverse bleeding events compared to unfractionated heparin in patients undergoing PCI. However, the effect of diminished renal function on the safety and efficacy of bivalirudin for PCI is unknown. We aimed to test the safety of bivalirudin in routine practice and to assess whether this benefit was influenced by renal function.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The interaction between renal impairment and benefit from bivalirudin was assessed in 115 consecutive patients (age 68.5+/-12.1, 45% female) undergoing PCI. Bivalirudin dosing was adjusted based on renal function. Creatinine clearance (CrCl) was calculated using the Cockroft-Gault formula. The composite endpoints of in-hospital death, myocardial infarction or revascularization and bleeding events were assessed. Overall, these events occurred in 10 (8.7%) patients. Patients with a CrCl<60 ml/min had a significantly increased risk for in-hospital complications (18.6 versus 2.78%, P = 0.011). Univariate analysis for MACE and bleeding were significant for CrCl<60 ml/min OR: 2.54 (95% CI: 1.61-39.7, P = 0.011), age OR: 3.29 (95% CI: 1.07-1.39, P<0.001) and female gender OR: 2.1 (95% CI: 0.036-0.89, P = 0.036). Risk of complications increased with decreasing renal function: 2.7, 14.2, and 37.5% for CrCl of >60, 30-60 or <30 ml/min, respectively, P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Advanced age, renal dysfunction, and female gender remain important risk factors for ischemic and bleeding complications in patients undergoing PCI with bivalirudin.

Renal function, concomitant medication use and outcomes following acute coronary syndromes

BACKGROUND

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is highly prevalent in patients with cardiovascular disease. We explored the associations of CKD with outcomes using combined data from two large acute coronary syndrome (ACS) trials. We also explored the associations of CKD with prescription patterns for common cardiovascular medications and the association of these prescription patterns with clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Patients were stratified by CKD stage using creatinine clearance (CrCl, ml/min) estimated by the modified MDRD equation using baseline core laboratory creatinine measures. Serum creatinine > or =1.5 mg/dl was an exclusion criterion for the SYMPHONY trials. Baseline characteristics and outcomes across CKD categories were compared and Cox proportional hazards regression was used to assess the relationship of renal insufficiency with clinical outcomes after adjusting for previously identified outcome predictors. Interactions between the use of specific medications and calculated CrCl were tested in the final Cox proportional hazards model predicting time to mortality.

RESULTS

Of 13 707 patients analysed, 6840 had CKD stage I (CrCl > or =90 ml/min), 5909 stage II (CrCl 60-89 ml/min), 955 stage III (CrCl 30-59 ml/min) and three stage IV (CrCl <30 ml/min). Patients with more advanced CKD (III) were older, more often female, non-smokers and more likely to have co-morbid diseases including diabetes mellitus, hypertension and congestive heart failure. Cardiovascular medications were used less frequently in patients with CKD. Unadjusted survival was poorer in patients with CKD stages > or =II. In adjusted analyses, for those with CrCl < or =91, each 10 ml/min increase in CrCl was associated with a significantly decreased risk of mortality (hazards ratio 0.897, 95% confidence interval 0.815-0.986) (P = 0.024). The interaction between use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and CrCl was significantly associated with outcomes; the benefit of drug therapy was greater among patients with CKD.

CONCLUSIONS

CKD is an independent predictor of risk among ACS patients, and is associated with less frequent use of proven medical therapies. More aggressive use of conventional cardiovascular therapies in patients with CKD and ACS may be warranted.

Treatment of acute coronary syndromes in patients who have chronic kidney disease

Patients with CKD and CAD have traditionally been a difficult population to diagnose and treat in the setting of ACS. In addition to having poorer outcomes post-ACS, data are lacking regarding best treatments available. Aggressive interventional and medical treatments in this group with already poor outcomes are not necessarily contraindicated and should always be considered. The appalling outcome for CKD patients post-ACS is improved by many therapies shown to benefit in the non-CKD patients. Data suggest that troponins are useful markers in CKD patients, that major bleeding is not increased with the use of GP IIb-IIIa antagonists, that thrombolytics have been used successfully in CKD patients, and that PCI electively and as a primary treatment for ACS is successful and probably more beneficial to treatment.

Bivalirudin versus heparin and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition among patients with renal impairment undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (a subanalysis of the REPLACE-2 trial)

Among patients who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention, renal impairment is associated with an excessive risk of bleeding and ischemic events. Bivalirudin provides comparable suppression of ischemic events with a decrease in bleeding events compared with heparin and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition. We examined the relation between adverse events, renal impairment, and antithrombotic therapy within a randomized comparison. The Second Randomized Evaluation in PCI Linking Bivalirudin to Reduced Clinical Events per-protocol study population was assessed. Renal function was defined as calculated creatinine clearance <60 ml/min. Events within the overall study population and within each study arm were assessed. Thirty-day events by renal function were compared by chi-square test and logistic regression. Late mortality was compared by log-rank test. Interaction analyses were performed. Among 5,710 patients, renal impairment was associated with increased ischemic events (hazard ratio 1.45, 95% confidence interval 1.13 to 1.88, p = 0.004), bleeding complications (hazard ratio 1.72, 95% confidence interval 1.06 to 2.80, p = 0.028), and excessive 12-month mortality (hazard ratio 3.85, 95% confidence interval 2.67 to 5.54, p <0.001). Bivalirudin provided suppression of ischemic events that was comparable to heparin and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition regardless of renal impairment. Fewer bleeding events with bivalirudin were also evident irrespective of renal dysfunction. No interaction between treatment assignment, bleeding or ischemic complications, and renal impairment was observed. The safety and efficacy of bivalirudin compared with heparin and planned glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition in this high-risk group are comparable and consistent with the results of the overall trial.

The renal patient with coronary artery disease

The patient with chronic kidney disease and coronary artery disease (CAD) presents special challenges. This report reviews the scope of the challenge, the hostile internal milieu predisposing to CAD and cardiac events, management issues, unresolved dilemmas, and the need for randomized trials to allow for evidence-based treatment.

Platelet-Active Drugs: The Relationships Among Dose, Effectiveness, and Side Effects

This article discusses platelet active drugs as part of the Seventh American College of Chest Physicians Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy: Evidence-Based Guidelines. New data on antiplatelet agents include the following: (1) the role of aspirin in primary prevention has been the subject of recommendations based on the assessment of cardiovascular risk; (2) an increasing number of reports suggest a substantial interindividual variability in the response to antiplatelet agents, and various phenomena of "resistance" to the antiplatelet effects of aspirin and clopidogrel; (3) the benefit/risk profile of currently available glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists is substantially uncertain for patients with acute coronary syndromes who are not routinely scheduled for early revascularization; (4) there is an expanding role for the combination of aspirin and clopidogrel in the long-term management of high-risk patients; and (5) the cardiovascular effects of selective and nonselective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors have been the subject of increasing attention.

Cardiovascular disease and chronic kidney disease: insights and an update

Despite the high prevalence and significant morbidity and mortality rates of chronic kidney disease (CKD) related to cardiovascular disease, it remains vastly understudied. Most of the current practice recommendations come from small under-powered prospective studies, retrospective reviews, and assuming patients with CKD will similarly benefit from medications and treatments as patients with normal renal function. In addition, because of the previous lack of a consistent definition of CKD and how to measure renal function, definitions of the degree of renal dysfunction have varied widely and compounded the confusion of these data. Remarkably, despite patients with CKD representing the group at highest risk from cardiovascular complications, even greater than patients with diabetes mellitus, there has been a systematic exclusion of patients with CKD from therapeutic trials. This review outlines our current understanding of CKD as a cardiovascular risk factor, treatment options, and the future directions that are needed to treat cardiovascular disease in patients with CKD.

Dosing considerations and monitoring of low molecular weight heparins and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists in patients with renal insufficiency

Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors and low molecular heparins are important new components of the medical treatment for acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Renal insufficiency is a common comorbid condition and high-risk marker for ACS. The safety and efficacy of these treatments in ACS are dependent on the pharmacokinetics of the specific medication. Even though these treatments have been studied in large randomized controlled trials in ACS, there are few prospective data regarding their safety or efficacy in renal insufficiency. Most have been shown to be safe and effective in mild to moderate degrees of renal insufficiency; none have been thoroughly studied in severe renal disease or in patients requiring dialysis therapy. Future prospective trials should include patients with more severe renal insufficiency, as well as combinations of the current recommended therapies.