Rationale, design, and baseline characteristics of the Prospective Randomized Evaluation of the Vascular Effects of Norvasc Trial (PREVENT)

Polygenic scores for cardiovascular risk factors improve estimation of clinical outcomes in CCB treatment compared to pharmacogenetic variants alone

Pharmacogenetic variants are associated with clinical outcomes during Calcium Channel Blocker (CCB) treatment, yet whether the effects are modified by genetically predicted clinical risk factors is unknown. We analyzed 32,000 UK Biobank participants treated with dihydropiridine CCBs (mean 5.9 years), including 23 pharmacogenetic variants, and calculated polygenic scores for systolic and diastolic blood pressures, body fat mass, and other patient characteristics. Outcomes included treatment discontinuation and heart failure. Pharmacogenetic variant rs10898815-A (NUMA1) increased discontinuation rates, highest in those with high polygenic scores for fat mass. The RYR3 variant rs877087 T-allele alone modestly increased heart failure risks versus non-carriers (HR:1.13, p = 0.02); in patients with high polygenic scores for fat mass, lean mass, and lipoprotein A, risks were substantially elevated (HR:1.55, p = 4 × 10-5). Incorporating polygenic scores for adiposity and lipoprotein A may improve risk estimates of key clinical outcomes in CCB treatment such as treatment discontinuation and heart failure, compared to pharmacogenetic variants alone.

Antihypertensive treatment and risk of cancer: an individual participant data meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Some studies have suggested a link between antihypertensive medication and cancer, but the evidence is so far inconclusive. Thus, we aimed to investigate this association in a large individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov from Jan 1, 1966, to Sept 1, 2019, to identify potentially eligible randomised controlled trials. Eligible studies were randomised controlled trials comparing one blood pressure lowering drug class with a placebo, inactive control, or other blood pressure lowering drug. We also required that trials had at least 1000 participant years of follow-up in each treatment group. Trials without cancer event information were excluded. We requested individual participant data from the authors of eligible trials. We pooled individual participant-level data from eligible trials and assessed the effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), β blockers, calcium channel blockers, and thiazide diuretics on cancer risk in one-stage individual participant data and network meta-analyses. Cause-specific fixed-effects Cox regression models, stratified by trial, were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs). The primary outcome was any cancer event, defined as the first occurrence of any cancer diagnosed after randomisation. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42018099283).

FINDINGS

33 trials met the inclusion criteria, and included 260 447 participants with 15 012 cancer events. Median follow-up of included participants was 4·2 years (IQR 3·0-5·0). In the individual participant data meta-analysis comparing each drug class with all other comparators, no associations were identified between any antihypertensive drug class and risk of any cancer (HR 0·99 [95% CI 0·95-1·04] for ACEIs; 0·96 [0·92-1·01] for ARBs; 0·98 [0·89-1·07] for β blockers; 1·01 [0·95-1·07] for thiazides), with the exception of calcium channel blockers (1·06 [1·01-1·11]). In the network meta-analysis comparing drug classes against placebo, we found no excess cancer risk with any drug class (HR 1·00 [95% CI 0·93-1·09] for ACEIs; 0·99 [0·92-1·06] for ARBs; 0·99 [0·89-1·11] for β blockers; 1·04 [0·96-1·13] for calcium channel blockers; 1·00 [0·90-1·10] for thiazides).

INTERPRETATION

We found no consistent evidence that antihypertensive medication use had any effect on cancer risk. Although such findings are reassuring, evidence for some comparisons was insufficient to entirely rule out excess risk, in particular for calcium channel blockers.

FUNDING

British Heart Foundation, National Institute for Health Research, Oxford Martin School.

Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Progression as Surrogate Marker for Cardiovascular Risk: Meta-Analysis of 119 Clinical Trials Involving 100 667 Patients

BACKGROUND

To quantify the association between effects of interventions on carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) progression and their effects on cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk.

METHODS

We systematically collated data from randomized, controlled trials. cIMT was assessed as the mean value at the common-carotid-artery; if unavailable, the maximum value at the common-carotid-artery or other cIMT measures were used. The primary outcome was a combined CVD end point defined as myocardial infarction, stroke, revascularization procedures, or fatal CVD. We estimated intervention effects on cIMT progression and incident CVD for each trial, before relating the 2 using a Bayesian meta-regression approach.

RESULTS

We analyzed data of 119 randomized, controlled trials involving 100 667 patients (mean age 62 years, 42% female). Over an average follow-up of 3.7 years, 12 038 patients developed the combined CVD end point. Across all interventions, each 10 μm/y reduction of cIMT progression resulted in a relative risk for CVD of 0.91 (95% Credible Interval, 0.87-0.94), with an additional relative risk for CVD of 0.92 (0.87-0.97) being achieved independent of cIMT progression. Taken together, we estimated that interventions reducing cIMT progression by 10, 20, 30, or 40 μm/y would yield relative risks of 0.84 (0.75-0.93), 0.76 (0.67-0.85), 0.69 (0.59-0.79), or 0.63 (0.52-0.74), respectively. Results were similar when grouping trials by type of intervention, time of conduct, time to ultrasound follow-up, availability of individual-participant data, primary versus secondary prevention trials, type of cIMT measurement, and proportion of female patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The extent of intervention effects on cIMT progression predicted the degree of CVD risk reduction. This provides a missing link supporting the usefulness of cIMT progression as a surrogate marker for CVD risk in clinical trials.

Primary and secondary prevention of stroke by antihypertensive drug treatment

Hypertension is the most powerful risk factor for stroke. Antihypertensive drug treatment reduces the incidence of stroke. In a meta-analysis of actively controlled trials, calcium-channel blockers, including (-8%; p = 0.07) or excluding verapamil (-10%; p = 0.02), as well as angiotensin Type 1 receptor blockers (-24%; p = 0.0002) resulted in better stroke prevention than the old drugs (diuretics or beta-blockers), whereas the opposite trend was observed for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (+10%; p = 0.03). An overview of six trials conducted in patients with a history of cerebrovascular disease demonstrated that blood pressure-lowering therapy reduced stroke recurrence by 25% (p = 0.004). A meta-regression analysis showed that within-trial differences in systolic blood pressure accounted for the prevention of stroke in most trials. This finding was corroborated by the recently published Valsartan Antihypertensive Long-term Use Evaluation trial.

Circulating lipid hydroperoxides predict cardiovascular events in patients with stable coronary artery disease: the PREVENT study

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed to determine the predictive value of lipid hydroperoxide (LOOH) levels for adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD).

BACKGROUND

Oxidative modification of circulating lipids contributes to inflammation and endothelial dysfunction, which are hallmark features of atherosclerosis. A serum biomarker of oxidation is LOOH, which is a primary product of fatty acid peroxidation.

METHODS

Serum LOOH levels were measured and correlated with clinical events over a 3-year period in 634 patients with angiographic evidence of CAD.

RESULTS

Baseline LOOH levels in the highest quartile were associated with hazard ratios of 3.24 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.86 to 5.65; p = 0.0001) for nonfatal vascular events (n = 149), 1.80 (95% CI 1.13 to 2.88; p = 0.014) for major vascular procedures (n = 139), and 2.23 (95% CI 1.44 to 3.44; p = 0.0003) for all vascular events and procedures. Baseline LOOH levels correlated with serum levels of soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (p = 0.001) and thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (p = 0.001) as well as the mean percent change in stenosis for large segments >50% stenosed (p = 0.048). A multivariate proportional hazards model, adjusted for traditional risk factors and inflammatory markers, showed an independent effect of LOOH on nonfatal vascular events, vascular procedures, and all events or procedures. Amlodipine treatment was associated with reduced cardiovascular events and changes in LOOH levels compared with placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated LOOH levels were predictive of nonfatal vascular events and procedures in patients with stable CAD, independent of traditional risk factors and inflammatory markers.

Rationale and public health implications of changing CHD risk factor definitions

The definition of disease is central to the practice of medicine and to public health policy. Practice guidelines set standards for disease identification and treatment. Quality care is often defined as adherence to these guidelines. Over the past few years, the diagnostic thresholds for several common medical conditions have been lowered, resulting in a substantial expansion in the market for health care. The most recent guidelines for high blood pressure, high cholesterol, and impaired fasting glucose each define a high percentage of the adult population as in need of regular medical attention. Under the latest proposed thresholds, virtually the entire adult population qualifies for a chronic condition diagnosis. We evaluate the health and financial outcomes associated with changes in diagnostic thresholds for the prevention of three risk factors for cardiovascular disease and stroke: blood pressure, serum cholesterol, and fasting plasma glucose. Estimates of the numbers of people affected, the cost implications, and the overall public health consequences are offered.

Tracking Coronary Calcification and Atherosclerotic Lesions in Patients with Stable Angina Pectoris Undergoing Nifedipine Therapy

AIMS

The objective of the Coronary Calcification (CC) study was to determine in patients with chronic symptomatic coronary artery disease, if, in addition to standard therapy, nifedipine GITS, relative to placebo, would arrest or slow down the progression of calcium or the development of new atherosclerotic lesions in the coronary arteries.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The CC study was part of the ACTION trial. Multi-slice computerized tomography was used to measure and track the progression of CC. Five hundred and eighteen patients were included in this study. The changes in calcium score from baseline every 24 months, over a period of between 4.5 and 6 years, were similar in the nifedipine and placebo treatment groups (p = 0.8). Compared to placebo, more patients in the nifedipine group (71 vs. 60%) were free of new calcified atherosclerotic lesions during follow-up(p = 0.095).

CONCLUSION

Nifedipine GITS was not effective in slowing down the progression of calcium in advanced atherosclerotic plaques in patients with stable angina pectoris. Although statistically not significant, Nifedipine demonstrated a trend in slowing down the development of new atherosclerotic lesions.

TGF-beta and TNF-alpha producing effects of losartan and amlodipine on human mononuclear cell culture

AIM

The modulation of cytokine release, which affects adhesion of leucocytes to endothelial cells, and proliferation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells with antihypertensive drugs was explored.

METHOD

In the present study, mononuclear cells were incubated with losartan and amlodipine at concentrations of 10(-6), 10(-5) and 10(-4) mol/L for 6 h. Transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta and tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha levels were measured. Proliferation of mononuclear cells were assessed at the same concentrations of amlodipine and losartan with the methylthiazoletetrazolium (MTT) test.

RESULTS

Amlodipine was found to induce TGF-beta synthesis from mononuclear cells with increasing concentrations, while it was found to inhibit TNF-alpha secretion with increasing concentrations. In contrast, losartan was found to induce TGF-beta and TNF-alpha secretion with increasing concentrations.

CONCLUSION

Anti-atherosclerotic effects of amlodipine and losartan might be through increased secretion of TGF-beta from mononuclear cells. Different results at different concentrations might be due to the pharmocokinetic differences of these drugs.

Do angiotensin II receptor blockers increase the risk of myocardial infarction?

AIMS

The uncertainty surrounding safety of angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) increased after publication of experimental and clinical studies which suggested an excess risk of myocardial infarction (MI) in people treated with ARBs.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials, which compared ARBs with either a placebo or active drugs different from ARBs. Overall, ARBs were not associated with an excess risk of MI [odds ratio (OR): 1.03 in a random-effect model and 1.02 in a fixed-effect model]. In pre-specified subgroup analyses, incidence of MI did not differ between ARBs and either placebo (OR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.84-1.10) or angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)-Inhibitors (OR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.91-1.07). Incidence of MI was slightly higher with ARBs than with drug classes different from ACE-Inhibitors (OR: 1.16; P=0.06 in a random-effect model and 0.017 in a fixed-effect model). Cardiovascular mortality did not differ between ARBs and drugs different from ARBs (OR: 1.00 in a random-effect model and 0.99 in a fixed-effect model) and it was slightly lesser with ARBs than with placebo (OR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.83-0.99; P=0.042) in a pre-specified subgroup analysis.

CONCLUSION

Our findings do not support the hypothesis that ARBs increase the risk of MI.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Calcium Channel Blockers for Coronary Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention

We investigated whether protection from coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke conferred by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and calcium channel blockers (CCBs) in hypertensive or high-risk patients may be explained by the specific drug regimen. We extracted summary statistics regarding CHD and stroke from 28 outcome trials that compared either ACEIs or CCBs with diuretics, β-blockers, or placebo for a total of 179 122 patients, 9509 incident cases of CHD, and 5971 cases of stroke. CHD included myocardial infarction and coronary death. In placebo-controlled trials, ACEIs decreased the risk of CHD ( P <0.001), and CCBs reduced stroke incidence ( P <0.001). There were no significant differences in CHD risk between regimens based on diuretics/β-blockers and regimens based on ACEIs ( P =0.46) or CCBs ( P =0.52). The risk of stroke was reduced by CCBs ( P =0.041) but not by ACEIs ( P =0.15) compared with diuretics/β-blockers. Because heterogeneity between trials was significant, we investigated potential sources of heterogeneity by metaregression. Examined covariates were the reduction in systolic blood pressure (BP), drug treatment (ACEIs versus CCBs), their interaction term, sex, age at randomization, year of publication, and duration of treatment. Prevention of CHD was explained by systolic BP reduction ( P <0.001) and use of ACEIs ( P =0.028), whereas prevention of stroke was explained by systolic BP reduction ( P =0.001) and use of CCBs ( P =0.042). These findings confirm that BP lowering is fundamental for prevention of CHD and stroke. However, over and beyond BP reduction, ACEIs appear superior to CCBs for prevention of CHD, whereas CCBs appear superior to ACEIs for prevention of stroke.

Blood Pressure Reduction and Cardiovascular Prevention: An Update Including the 2003-2004 Secondary Prevention Trials

In a meta-analysis published in June 2003, we reported that new and old classes of antihypertensive drugs had similar long-term efficacy and safety. Furthermore, we observed that in clinical trials in hypertensive or high-risk patients gradients in systolic blood pressure (SBP) accounted for most differences in outcome. To test whether our previous conclusions would hold, we updated our quantitative overview with new information from clinical trials published before 2005. To compare new and old antihypertensive drugs, we computed pooled odds ratios from stratified 2 x 2 contingency tables. In a meta-regression analysis, we correlated these odds ratios with corresponding between-group differences in SBP. We then contrasted observed odds ratios with those predicted from gradients in SBP. The main finding of our overview was that reduction in SBP largely explained cardiovascular outcomes in the recently published actively controlled trials in hypertensive patients and in placebo-controlled secondary prevention trials. The published results suggested that dihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers might offer a selective benefit in the prevention of stroke and inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system in the prevention of heart failure. For prevention of myocardial infarction, the published results were more equivocal, because of the benefit of amlodipine over placebo or valsartan in 2 trials, whereas other placebo-controlled trials of calcium-channel blockers or angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors did not substantiate the expected benefit with regard to cardiac outcomes. In conclusion, the hypothesis that new antihypertensive drugs might influence cardiovascular prognosis over and beyond their antihypertensive effect remains unproven. Our overview emphasizes the need of tight blood pressure control, but does not allow determining to what extent blood pressure must be lowered for optimal cardiovascular prevention.

Calcium antagonists

Calcium antagonists were introduced for the treatment of hypertension in the 1980s. Their use was subsequently expanded to additional disorders, such as angina pectoris, paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardias, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, Raynaud phenomenon, pulmonary hypertension, diffuse esophageal spasms, and migraine. Calcium antagonists as a group are heterogeneous and include 3 main classes--phenylalkylamines, benzothiazepines, and dihydropyridines--that differ in their molecular structure, sites and modes of action, and effects on various other cardiovascular functions. Calcium antagonists lower blood pressure mainly through vasodilation and reduction of peripheral resistance. They maintain blood flow to vital organs, and are safe in patients with renal impairment. Unlike diuretics and beta-blockers, calcium antagonists do not impair glucose metabolism or lipid profile and may even attenuate the development of arteriosclerotic lesions. In long-term follow-up, patients treated with calcium antagonists had development of less overt diabetes mellitus than those who were treated with diuretics and beta-blockers. Moreover, calcium antagonists are able to reduce left ventricular mass and are effective in improving anginal pain. Recent prospective randomized studies attested to the beneficial effects of calcium antagonists in hypertensive patients. In comparison with placebo, calcium antagonist-based therapy reduced major cardiovascular events and cardiovascular death significantly in elderly hypertensive patients and in diabetic patients. In several comparative studies in hypertensive patients, treatment with calcium antagonists was equally effective as treatment with diuretics, beta-blockers, or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. From these studies, it seems that a calcium antagonist-based regimen is superior to other regimens in preventing stroke, equivalent in preventing ischemic heart disease, and inferior in preventing congestive heart failure. Calcium antagonists are also safe and effective as first-line or add-on therapy in diabetic hypertensive patients. Heart rate-lowering calcium antagonists (verapamil, diltiazem) may have an edge over the dihydropyridines in post-myocardial infarction patients and in diabetic nephropathy. Thus, calcium antagonists may be safely used in the management of hypertension and angina pectoris.

Association of increased carotid intima-media thickness with the extent of coronary artery disease

OBJECTIVE

To investigate (a) the relation between intima-media thickness (IMT) in carotid arteries and the extent of coronary artery disease (CAD); and (b) whether IMT is predictive of coronary atherosclerosis. The coexistence of severe extracranial atherosclerosis in patients with CAD was also analysed.

METHODS

Coronary angiography and carotid ultrasound evaluation were performed in 558 consecutive patients (438 men), with a mean (SD) age of 58.8 (9.2) years and suspected CAD. Mean IMT was measured at both carotid arteries and expressed as the mean aggregate value. The relation between IMT and severity of CAD was determined.

RESULTS

A significant correlation between mean IMT and advancing CAD (p < 0.0001) was found. Four independent predictors of CAD were found in the discriminant analysis: age (p = 0.0193), hyperlipidaemia (p < 0.0001), smoking (p = 0.0032), and IMT (p < 0.0001). A significant increase in IMT was observed among patients with one, two, and three vessel CAD. A log normal distribution of IMT values showed that if mean IMT was over 1.15 mm, patients had a 94% probability of having CAD, with sensitivity of 65% and specificity of 80% in the patients with a high risk of CAD. The number of critically stenosed extracranial arteries increased with advancing CAD. None of the patients with normal coronary arteries had severe stenosis of the extracranial arteries. Severe carotid, vertebral, or subclavian stenosis was found in 16.6% of patients with three vessel CAD.

CONCLUSIONS

IMT increases with advancing CAD, patients with mean IMT over 1.15 mm have a 94% likelihood of having CAD, and the coexistence of CAD with severe stenosis of aortic arch arteries is relatively high and was found in 16.6% of patients with three vessel CAD.

Serum levels of thiobarbituric acid reactive substances predict cardiovascular events in patients with stable coronary artery disease

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to test the predictive value of an oxidative stress biomarker in 634 patients from the Prospective Randomized Evaluation of the Vascular Effects of Norvasc Trial (PREVENT).

BACKGROUND

Oxidative stress contributes to mechanisms of atherosclerosis and plaque instability. Biomarkers of oxidation, such as malondialdehyde (MDA), may represent independent indicators of risk for patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD).

METHODS

Serum MDA levels were measured as thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) in 634 patients with documented CAD using reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography and spectrophotometric approaches.

RESULTS

During the three-year study, there were 51 major vascular events such as fatal/nonfatal myocardial infarction, 149 hospitalizations for nonfatal vascular events, and 139 patients underwent a major vascular procedure. At baseline, patients with TBARS levels in the highest quartile had a relative risk (RR) of 3.30 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.47 to 7.42; p = 0.038) for major vascular events, RR of 4.10 (95% CI 2.55 to 6.60; p < 0.0001) for nonfatal vascular events, and RR of 3.84 (95% CI 2.56 to 5.76; p < 0.0001) for major vascular procedures. The effect of TBARS on events and procedures was also seen in a multivariate model adjusted for inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein, soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1, interleukin-6), and other risk factors (age, low-density lipoprotein, high-density lipoprotein, total cholesterol, triglycerides, body mass index, and blood pressure). This analysis showed an independent effect of TBARS on major vascular events (p = 0.0149), nonfatal vascular events (p < 0.0001), major vascular procedures (p < 0.001), and all vascular events and procedures (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Serum levels of TBARS were strongly predictive of cardiovascular events in patients with stable CAD, independently of traditional risk factors and inflammatory markers.

Atheroprotective effects of long-acting dihydropyridine-type calcium channel blockers: evidence from clinical trials and basic scientific research

Atherosclerosis is a systemic disease that can ultimately lead to ischaemia and infarction in the heart, brain and peripheral vasculature. According to the "response to injury" hypothesis, endothelial dysfunction is the early event that allows penetration of lipids and inflammatory cells into the arterial wall, contributing to the development of the atherosclerotic lesion. Endothelial dysfunction is causally related to a variety of risk factors for atherosclerosis, including hyperlipidaemia and hypertension. Agents that restore endothelial function and NO bioavailability have beneficial anti-atherogenic activities and can improve cardiovascular outcomes; this has been observed with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, statins and certain dihydropyridine-type calcium channel blockers (CCBs). In the Prospective Randomised Evaluation of the Vascular Effects of Norvasc Trial (PREVENT), the CCB amlodipine provided significant clinical benefits compared with placebo, including a marked reduction in cardiovascular morbidity and a reduction in the progression of carotid atherosclerosis. As these beneficial effects of amlodipine have not been observed with other dihydropyridine-type CCBs, it has been proposed that this agent has distinct anti-atherosclerotic properties related to its strong lipophilicity and membrane location. Experimental support for this hypothesis has been obtained from various in vitro and in vivo models of atherosclerosis. These findings support a broader therapeutic role for third-generation dihydropyridine-type CCBs in the treatment of atherosclerosis.

Cardiovascular prevention and blood pressure reduction: a quantitative overview updated until 1 March 2003

BACKGROUND

In a meta-analysis published in October 2001, we reported that new and old classes of antihypertensive drugs had similar long-term efficacy and safety. Furthermore, we observed that in clinical trials in hypertensive or high-risk patients gradients in systolic pressure accounted for most differences in outcome.

OBJECTIVE

To test whether our previous conclusions would hold, we updated our quantitative overview with new information from 14 clinical trials presented before 1 March 2003.

METHODS

To compare new and old antihypertensive drugs, we computed pooled odds ratios from stratified 2 x 2 contingency tables. If Zelen's test of heterogeneity was significant, we used a random effects model. In a meta-regression analysis, we correlated odds ratios with corresponding between-group differences in systolic pressure. We then contrasted observed odds ratios with those predicted from gradients in systolic pressure.

MAIN OUTCOMES

Differences in achieved systolic blood pressure and incidence of total and cardiovascular mortality, cardiovascular events, stroke, myocardial infarction and heart failure. NEW VERSUS OLD DRUGS: In 15 trials, 120 574 hypertensive patients were randomized to old drugs (diuretics or beta-blockers) or new agents [calcium-channel blockers, alpha-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin type-1 receptor (AR1) blockers]. Old and new drugs provided similar protection against total and cardiovascular mortality and fatal plus non-fatal myocardial infarction. Calcium-channel blockers, including (-8%, P = 0.07) or excluding verapamil (-10%, P = 0.02), as well as AR1 blockers (-24%, P = 0.0002) resulted in better stroke prevention than did the old drugs, whereas the opposite trend was observed for ACE inhibitors (+10%, P = 0.03). The risk of heart failure was higher (P < 0.0001) on calcium-channel blockers (+33%) and alpha-blockers (+102%) than on conventional therapy involving diuretics. META-REGRESSION: Between-group differences in achieved systolic pressure ranged from 0.1 to 3.2 mmHg in seven actively controlled trials (73 237 patients), and from 2.1 to 22.1 mmHg in seven studies comparing varying intensities of blood pressure lowering (11 128 patients). For these 14 new trials, we predicted outcome from achieved systolic blood pressure using our previously published meta-regression models based on 30 trials with 149 407 patients. In general, predicted and observed odds ratios were similar. Larger reductions in systolic pressure (weighted mean 1.8 mmHg) in two trials accounted for the advantage of AR1 blockers over conventional therapy in the prevention of stroke. Only for cardiovascular mortality in very old patients (P = 0.02) and for cardiovascular events and myocardial infarction in old Australians (P < 0.05), the observed odds ratios deviated from our predictions based on the gradients in systolic blood pressure.

INTERPRETATION

The hypothesis that new antihypertensive drugs, such as calcium-channel blockers, alpha-blockers, ACE inhibitors or AR1 blockers might influence cardiovascular prognosis over and beyond their antihypertensive effects remains unproven. The finding that blood pressure differences largely accounted for cardiovascular outcome emphasizes the desirability of tight blood pressure control. However, the level to which blood pressure must be lowered to achieve maximal benefit remains currently unknown.

Diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease

Diabetes is associated with a high incidence and poor prognosis of cardiovascular disease, and with high short- and long-term mortality. Adequate treatment of cardiovascular disorders and aggressive management of coexisting risk factors have proved to be at least as effective in diabetic as in nondiabetic patients in randomized, controlled studies. Indeed, treating diabetic patients with cardiovascular disease results in a larger absolute risk reduction than in nondiabetic subjects. Nevertheless, diabetic patients often receive inadequate therapy, which may, to a certain extent, explain their poor prognosis. Recommendations for the treatment of diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction should include beta-blockers, aspirin, and ACE-inhibitors in all patients in whom no specific contraindications exist. Fibrinolysis should be administered when indicated, and the benefits of improving glycemic control should not be forgotten either. In patients with multi-vessel disease who need revascularization, when selecting the type of procedure, the superiority of surgical revascularization over angioplasty should be borne in mind. Even heart transplantation should be included as a therapeutic option since there are no data to support the exclusion of patients on account of their diabetes. Finally, coexisting risk factors should be intensively treated through lifestyle intervention, with or without drug therapy, in order to achieve secondary prevention goals.

Coronary benefits of calcium antagonist therapy for patients with hypertension

Calcium antagonists effective in lowering blood pressure are a heterogeneous group including three main classes: phenylalkylamines, benzothiazepines and dihydropyridines. Dihydropyridines have a dual mode of action upon the endothelium contributing to their beneficial antihypertensive effects: (1) direct relaxation by inhibition of smooth muscle L-type calcium current, and (2) indirect relaxation through release of nitric oxide from the vascular endothelium. Calcium antagonists may affect many calcium-dependent events in the formation of atherosclerosis such as the localized accumulation of collagen, elastin, and calcium together with monocyte infiltration and smooth muscle proliferation and migration. In the INSIGHT calcification study, the overall treatment effect of nifedipine demonstrated significant inhibition of coronary calcium progression over a three-year period. Calcium antagonists improve symptoms and reduce ischemia in hypertensive patients with ischemic heart disease. Although in placebo-controlled trials calcium antagonists demonstrated a significant reduction in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, they may be less effective than other types of antihypertensive drugs in preventing ischemic heart disease.

Management of coronary heart disease risk factors and progression with calcium channel blockers

The death rate from coronary heart disease (CHD) declined by 25% in the United States during 1987-1997, but the actual number of deaths fell by only 9%. Modifiable risk factors for CHD include hypertension, elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, reduced high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, cigarette smoking, and diabetes. Several randomized clinical trials demonstrated that calcium channel blockers reduce the frequency of strokes in patients with hypertension, with particular benefit observed in patients with both hypertension and diabetes. Results of a meta-analysis suggest that calcium channel blockers are similar to beta-blockers in preventing death or myocardial infarction and in improving exercise tolerance among patients with established CHD. In addition, amlodipine, a long-acting dihydropyridine, was reported to reduce nonfatal vascular events and major vascular procedures in patients with angina. Ongoing clinical trials are comparing amlodipine with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor for slowing the onset and progression of coronary artery plaque and cardiovascular events.

Calcium channel blocker nifedipine slows down progression of coronary calcification in hypertensive patients compared with diuretics

Calcium controls numerous events within the vessel wall. Permeability of the endothelium is calcium dependent, as are platelet activation and adhesion, vascular smooth muscle proliferation and migration, and synthesis of fibrous connective tissue. Double-helix computerized tomography is a noninvasive technique that can detect, measure, and compare coronary calcification in the coronary arteries. Using this method, our objective was to determine whether administration of nifedipine once daily in lieu of diuretics in high-risk hypertensive patients will arrest or slow down the progression of coronary artery calcification. The study was designed as a side arm of INSIGHT (International Nifedipine Study: Intervention as Goal for Hypertension Therapy), aimed to show the efficacy of nifedipine once daily versus co-amilozide (hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg, amiloride 2.5 mg) in high-risk hypertensive patients. A total of 201 patients with a total calcium score of >/=10 at the onset of study who underwent an annual double-helix computerized tomography for 3 years were analyzed for efficacy. Inhibition of coronary calcium progression was significant in the nifedipine versus the co-amilozide group during the first year (3.18% versus 27%, respectively, P=0.02), not significant during the second year (28.5% versus 47%, respectively, P=0.14), and significant during the third year (40% versus 78%, respectively, P=0.02). The results point to a slower progression of coronary calcification in hypertensive patients on nifedipine once daily versus co-amilozide.

The effect of amlodipine on endothelial function in young adults with a strong family history of premature coronary artery disease: a randomised double blind study

Endothelial dysfunction, an early event in atherogenesis, has been demonstrated in young asymptomatic subjects with a strong family history of premature coronary artery disease (CAD). In these subjects, preventive measures involving risk factor modification are not appropriate, and strategies employing novel antiatherogenic agents, such as the dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker, amlodipine, may be useful. Ninety-one subjects (mean age, 28.6 years; range, 18-40) with a strong family history of premature CAD and no other identified vascular risk factors were randomised to either 5 mg amlodipine (49 subjects) or placebo (42 subjects). Brachial artery flow mediated dilatation (FMD) (endothelium-dependent response) and response to glyceryltrinitrate (GTN) (direct smooth muscle dilator) were assessed non-invasively at baseline, and after 12 and 24 weeks using high-resolution vascular ultrasound. In those treated with amlodipine, mean FMD increased from 2.32+/-2.23% at baseline to 3.52+/-3.1% at 24 weeks (P<0.005). However, FMD also increased in the placebo group from 1.64+/-2.12 to 3.37+/-2.68% (P<0.002), and the difference between the FMD response in the amlodipine and placebo groups was not significant. Dilatation to GTN did not change in either group. Therefore, impaired endothelial function improved in family history subjects taking both amlodipine and placebo, but there is no difference between the groups.

Amlodipine increases nitric oxide synthesis in cytokine-stimulated cultured vascualar smooth muscle cells

OBJECTIVE

If calcium channel blockers affect nitric oxide synthesis in the vascular tissue, they could influence disease progression in coronary arteries. We investigated the effects of the calcium channel blocker amlodipine on nitric oxide synthesis by measuring the production of nitrite, a stable metabolite of nitric oxide, in vascular smooth muscle cells.

METHODS

We measured the production of nitrate in cultured rat vascular smooth muscle cells with the Griess reagent Inducible nitric oxide synthase protein and mRNA expression were assayed by Western blotting and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, respectively. The levels of NF-kappaB proteins in nuclear extracts were analyzed by gel retardation assay.

RESULTS

Incubation of cultures with interleukin-1 , (10 ng/ ml) for 24 h caused a significant increase in nitrite generation. Interleukin-1 l-induced nitrite production by vascular smooth muscle cells was significantly increased by amlodipine in a dose-dependent manner. This augmentative effect of amlodipine was completely abolished in the presence of N(G)-monomethyl-L-arginine or actinomycin D. Amlodipine-induced nitrite production was accompanied by increased inducible nitric oxide synthase mRNA and protein accumulation. Interleukin-1 , induced NF-kappaB activation in vascular smooth muscle cells, and addition of amlodipine further increased this NF-kappaB activation. The effect of amlodipine on nitrite production was maintained in the presence of the calcium channel agonist Bay K 8644.

CONCLUSION

Amlodipine enhances nitric oxide synthesis in cytokine-stimulated cultured vascular smooth muscle cells by L-type calcium channel-independent mechanisms.

Effect of amlodipine on the progression of atherosclerosis and the occurrence of clinical events. PREVENT Investigators

BACKGROUND

The results of angiographic studies have suggested that calcium channel-blocking agents may prevent new coronary lesion formation, the progression of minimal lesions, or both.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The Prospective Randomized Evaluation of the Vascular Effects of Norvasc Trial (PREVENT) was a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-masked clinical trial designed to test whether amlodipine would slow the progression of early coronary atherosclerosis in 825 patients with angiographically documented coronary artery disease. The primary outcome was the average 36-month angiographic change in mean minimal diameters of segments with a baseline diameter stenosis of 30%. A secondary hypothesis was whether amlodipine would reduce the rate of atherosclerosis in the carotid arteries as assessed with B-mode ultrasonography, which measured intimal-medial thicknesses (IMT). The rates of clinical events were also monitored. The placebo and amlodipine groups had nearly identical average 36-month reductions in the minimal diameter: 0.084 versus 0.095 mm, respectively (P:=0.38). In contrast, amlodipine had a significant effect in slowing the 36-month progression of carotid artery atherosclerosis: the placebo group experienced a 0.033-mm increase in IMT, whereas there was a 0. 0126-mm decrease in the amlodipine group (P:=0.007). There was no treatment difference in the rates of all-cause mortality or major cardiovascular events, although amlodipine use was associated with fewer cases of unstable angina and coronary revascularization.

CONCLUSIONS

Amlodipine has no demonstrable effect on angiographic progression of coronary atherosclerosis or the risk of major cardiovascular events but is associated with fewer hospitalizations for unstable angina and revascularization.

Differences in risk factors, atherosclerosis, and cardiovascular disease between ethnic groups in Canada: the Study of Health Assessment and Risk in Ethnic groups (SHARE)

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular disease rates vary greatly between ethnic groups in Canada. To establish whether this variation can be explained by differences in disease risk factors and subclinical atherosclerosis, we undertook a population-based study of three ethnic groups in Canada: South Asians, Chinese, and Europeans.

METHODS

985 participants were recruited from three cities (Hamilton, Toronto, and Edmonton) by stratified random sampling. Clinical cardiovascular disease was defined by history or electrocardiographic findings. Carotid atherosclerosis was measured with B-mode ultrasonography. Conventional (smoking, hypertension, diabetes, raised cholesterol) and novel risk factors (markers of a prothrombotic state) were measured.

FINDINGS

Within each ethnic group and overall, the degree of carotid atherosclerosis was associated with a higher prevalence of cardiovascular disease. South Asians had the highest prevalence of this condition compared with Europeans and Chinese (11%, 5%, and 2%, respectively, p=0.0004). Despite this finding, Europeans had more atherosclerosis (mean of the maximum intimal medial thickness 0.75 [0.16] mm) than South Asians (0.72 [0.15] mm), and Chinese (0.69 [0.16] mm). South Asians had an increased prevalence of glucose intolerance, higher total and LDL cholesterol, higher triglycerides, and lower HDL cholesterol, and much greater abnormalities in novel risk factors including higher concentrations of fibrinogen, homocysteine, lipoprotein (a), and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1.

INTERPRETATION

Although there are differences in conventional and novel risk factors between ethnic groups, this variation and the degree of atherosclerosis only partly explains the higher rates of cardiovascular disease among South Asians compared with Europeans and Chinese. The increased risk of cardiovascular events could be due to factors affecting plaque rupture, the interaction between prothrombotic factors and atherosclerosis, or as yet undiscovered risk factors.

Amlodipine inhibits expression of matrix metalloproteinase-1 and its inhibitor in human vascular endothelial cells

Matrix metalloproteinase-1 (MMP-1) may play an important role in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and atherosclerotic plaque rupture. We investigated the effect of the calcium channel blockers amlodipine and nifedipine on the expression of MMP-1 and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1) in endothelial cells (ECs). MMP-1 and TIMP-1 levels in conditioned media of human vascular ECs were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Collagenolytic activity was determined by fluorescence-labeled collagen digestion. The addition of interleukin-1beta (IL-1beta) increased MMP-1 levels in the culture media of ECs. Amlodipine, but not nifedipine, significantly decreased MMP-1 levels in IL-1beta-stimulated ECs. TIMP-1 levels also were significantly increased by IL-1beta, and its expression was slightly decreased by amlodipine, not by nifedipine. Amlodipine significantly inhibited collagenolytic activity in the culture media of IL-1beta-stimulated ECs, whereas nifedipine showed no significant effect on the activity. Our findings revealed that amlodipine, but not nifedipine, inhibits IL-1beta-induced MMP-1 expression in human ECs.

Amlodipine, a long-acting calcium channel blocker, attenuates morning blood pressure rise in hypertensive patients

1. The effects of once-daily calcium channel blockers with different plasma half-lives on diurnal blood pressure changes were examined in hypertensive patients. 2. Patients with essential hypertension, nine men and 13 women aged 61 +/- 2 years, were treated with amlodipine or nitrendipine in a random cross-over design for 12-16 weeks each. The study drugs were given once daily as monotherapy (n = 8) or in combination with other classes of antihypertensive drugs (n = 14). The plasma half-life of amlodipine is as long as 36 h, while that of nitrendipine is 10 h. At the end of each treatment period, 24 h ambulatory blood pressure and pulse rate were monitored. 3. Average office blood pressure was comparably controlled below 140/90 mmHg by either amlodipine or nitrendipine, both in the monotherapy and the combination therapy groups; however, pulse rate was greater in nitrendipine than in amlodipine either in the monotherapy (by 6 b.p.m., P < 0.05) or in the combination therapy (by 5 b.p.m., P < 0.01). 4. In 24 h blood pressure monitoring, morning (05.30-09.00 h) blood pressure was higher in nitrendipine than in amlodipine by 6/4 mmHg in the monotherapy (P < 0.05) and by 7/5 mmHg in the combination therapy (P < 0.03), although the blood pressure in the remainder of the 24 h did not differ between the two treatment periods. In addition, pulse rate in the daytime (09.30-18.00 h) was greater in nitrendipine than in amlodipine by 6 b.p.m. in the monotherapy (P < 0.01) and by 7 b.p.m. in the combination therapy (P < 0.02). 5. These results suggest slow pharmacokinetics of amlodipine provides an advantage in controlling morning blood pressure and mitigating reflex activation of the sympathetic nervous system.

Special considerations in the therapy of diabetic hypertension

Patients with diabetes mellitus have an increased prevalence of hypertension and associated cardiovascular disease (CVD), including coronary and cerebrovascular disease. The risk of an individual of developing CVD is much greater when both diseases coexist and is further magnified by their frequent association with dyslipidemia, coagulation, platelet, and endothelial abnormalities. Metabolic abnormalities frequently associated with hypertension are insulin resistance, enhanced coagulation, and decreased fibrinolytic activity. Drug treatment of hypertension in diabetic subjects is fraught with potential difficulties, including altered efficacy of medications, possible side effects, worsening of glycemic control, and impairment of lipid metabolism. Because hypertension is a major contributor to morbidity and mortality in diabetes, it should be recognized and treated early and aggressively despite these difficulties. This article reviews the efficacy and side effects of the various classes of antihypertensive agents in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Atheroprotection with amlodipine: cells to lesions and the PREVENT trial. Prospective Randomized Evaluation of the Vascular Effects of Norvasc Trial

Oxidized lipid and calcium regulatory abnormalities appear to play important roles in early atherogenesis secondary to cholesterol enrichment of the cell membrane in endothelial and arterial smooth muscle cells (SMCs). However, the link between the two is poorly understood. The findings reviewed here demonstrate that amlodipine has membrane-modifying and antioxidant actions at the cell membrane level in addition to its classical calcium channel blocking properties. These multiple pharmacologic actions may explain the cellular mechanisms of the atheroprotective effects of amlodipine in spontaneous atherogenesis and in accelerated atherosclerotic syndromes. Recent animal model studies have demonstrated that amlodipine inhibits the progression of atherosclerotic lesions and protects against restenosis after angioplasty. Amlodipine inhibits the cholesterol-induced increase in calcium permeability in SMCs, and has been shown to repair abnormalities in SMC membrane structure. Recent data have also demonstrated that amlodipine has a marked antioxidant action in membrane bilayers enriched with polyunsaturated fatty acids. However, these findings have been in animal models only; the efficacy of amlodipine in atheroprotection in humans cannot be predicted. The PREVENT trial has therefore been launched to examine the atheroprotective potential of amlodipine in spontaneous lesion development in humans with ischemic heart disease and in the prevention of restenosis after angioplasty.