Long-term efficacy of low-density lipoprotein apheresis on coronary heart disease in familial hypercholesterolemia. Hokuriku-FH-LDL-Apheresis Study Group

Efficacy of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Apheresis in the Treatment of Familial Hypercholesterolemia: Single Center Experience

PURPOSE

  Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a genetic disorder associated with extremely high levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and increased incidence of cardiovascular disease. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and long-term outcomes of lipoprotein apheresis (LA) in the treatment of FH.

METHODS

  Cardiovascular events that occurred before and after LA treatment were evaluated by reviewing previous medical records of patients with FH.

RESULTS

  Thirteen patients (female/male: 8/5) were included in this study. The mean Dutch score was 20±4. All patients were treated with a combination of statin and ezetimibe. Before the onset of LA, 8 patients had a history of coronary artery disease, and the median age at onset of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in these patients was 24 years. At the initiation of LA, the median age was 22 years and the mean LDL-C level was 410±130 mg/dL. The mean duration of LA treatment was 13.9±6.9 years. The mean LDL-C levels before and after the latest three LA treatments were 267±63.4 and 71.5±23.4 mg/dL, respectively. The mean reduction in LDL-C levels after LA was 73±8.2%. De novo cardiovascular events occurred in 10 patients during LA treatment; six of these patients had a known history of CVD before LA. Eight of these patients underwent invasive procedures for therapeutic purposes and the total number of procedures was 12.

CONCLUSION

  LA is an effective method of reducing LDL-C levels and an additional treatment option that may slow disease progression in patients with FH who are at high risk of cardiovascular events.

Lipoprotein Apheresis: Utility, Outcomes, and Implementation in Clinical Practice: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Despite the availability of multiple classes of lipoprotein-lowering medications, some high-risk patients have persistent hypercholesterolemia and may require nonpharmacologic therapy. Lipoprotein apheresis (LA) is a valuable but underused adjunctive therapeutic option for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and lipoprotein(a) lowering, particularly in children and adults with familial hypercholesterolemia. In addition to lipid lowering, LA reduces serum levels of proinflammatory and prothrombotic factors, reduces blood viscosity, increases microvascular myocardial perfusion, and may provide beneficial effects on endothelial function. Multiple observational studies demonstrate strong evidence for improved cardiovascular outcomes with LA; however, use in the United States is limited to a fraction of its Food and Drug Administration-approved indications. In addition, there are limited data regarding LA benefit for refractory focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. In this scientific statement, we review the history of LA, mechanisms of action, cardiovascular and renal outcomes data, indications, and options for treatment.

State of the Art: Lipoproteinapherese

Lipoprotein apheresis (LA) is usually a last resort in cardiovascular high-risk patients in the context of secondary prevention after lifestyle measures and maximal pharmacotherapy have failed to prevent the occurrence of new atherosclerotic cardiovascular events (ASCVDE) or to achieve the internationally accepted target values for LDL cholesterol (LDL-C). Patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (hoFH), in whom myocardial infarctions can occur even in children < 10 years of age without adequate therapy, often owe their survival to LA (used here in primary prevention). Severe hypercholesterolemia (HCH) can often be well controlled with modern potent lipid-lowering agents, including PCSK9 approaches, so that the need for LA has decreased here over the years. In contrast, the number of patients in whom elevation of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is relevant to atherogenesis is increasing in applications to the apheresis committees of the associations of panel physicians (KV). For this indication, LA is currently the only therapeutic procedure approved by the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA). LA significantly reduces the new occurrence of ASCVDE (comparison with the situation before the start of LA), especially in Lp(a) patients. There are convincing observational studies and a German LA Registry with now 10-year data, but there is no randomized controlled trial. This had been requested by the G-BA in 2008, and a corresponding concept was designed but not accepted by the ethics committee. In addition to the highly effective reduction of atherogenic lipoproteins, many discussed pleiotropic effects of LA itself, the medical rounds and motivating discussions also with the nursing staff, which take place within the weekly LA, certainly contribute to the success of the therapy (steady adjustment of all cardiovascular risk factors, lifestyle measures including smoking cessation, adherence of medication intake). This review article summarizes and discusses the study situation, clinical practical experience as well as the future of LA against the background of the currently rapid development of new pharmacotherapies.

Pharmacotherapy in familial hypercholesterolemia - Current state and emerging paradigms

Familial hypercholesterolemia is a highly prevalent but underdiagnosed disease marked by increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Aggressive reduction of LDL-cholesterol is a hallmark of cardiovascular risk mitigation in familial hypercholesterolemia. More recently, we have witnessed an expanded repertoire of pharmacologic agents that directly target LDL-cholesterol and/or reduce heart disease burden. In this state-of-the-art review, we explore the development, clinical efficacy and limitations of existing and potential future therapeutics in familial hypercholesterolemia.

Apheresis: What Should a Clinician Know?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Apheresis is a treatment option for severe dyslipidemia which has been introduced approximately 40 years ago to clinical practice. This article reviews recent apheresis research progresses, including apheresis for elevated LDL-cholesterol and elevated lipoprotein(a).

RECENT FINDINGS

While the role of apheresis in treating more common forms of LDL-hypercholesterolemia has been reduced due to the development of new, very potent LDL-lowering drugs, it still plays an important role in treating patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia and patients with severe lipoprotein(a) elevation. One apheresis session can decrease LDL-cholesterol, apoB, and lipoprotein(a) by approximately 65%, which results in a time averaged reduction of 30-50%. Although time-consuming, and expensive regular apheresis is very well tolerated and has been proven safe for decades. Apheresis remains a treatment option for severe dyslipidemia, especially in homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia and elevated lipoprotein(a), if other forms of therapy fail to achieve targets.

Complementary role of evinacumab in combination with lipoprotein apheresis in patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia

Patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) have severe hypercholesterolemia from birth and if untreated may experience very early onset of coronary artery disease in childhood or young adulthood with an aggressive course resulting in early death. Early initiation of aggressive low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering is the mainstay of treatment, which requires the use of a multidrug treatment regimen, often in combination with lipoprotein apheresis, but LDL-C goal achievement is frequently unattainable due to the severity of baseline hypercholesterolemia and hyporesponsiveness to many LDL-C-lowering medications. Evinacumab, a monoclonal antibody that sequesters angiopoietin-like 3 protein and lowers LDL-C by an average of 49% in patients with homozygous FH, was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in February 2021 and is a major advance in treatment of these high-risk patients. In this report, we describe the complementary role of evinacumab in combination with lipoprotein apheresis in two patients with homozygous FH.

COVID-19 and Therapeutic Apheresis

The COVID-19 pandemic, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, is an unprecedented challenge for the global community. The pathogenesis of COVID-19, its complications and long term sequelae (so called Long/Post-COVID) include, in addition to the direct virus-induced tissues injury, multiple secondary processes, such as autoimmune response, impairment of microcirculation, and hyperinflammation. Similar pathological processes, but in the settings of neurological, cardiovascular, rheumatological, nephrological, and dermatological diseases can be successfully treated by powerful methods of Therapeutic Apheresis (TA). We describe here the rationale and the initial attempts of TA treatment in severe cases of acute COVID-19. We next review the evidence for the role of autoimmunity, microcirculatory changes and inflammation in pathogenesis of Long/Post COVID and the rationale for targeting those pathogenic processes by different methods of TA. Finally, we discuss the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on patients, who undergo regular TA treatments due to their underlying chronic conditions, with the specific focus on the patients with inherited lipid diseases being treated at the Dresden University Apheresis Center.

Vascular access for lipid apheresis: a challenge in young children with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia

Background

Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (hoFH) is a rare genetic disorder leading to extremely increased LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C), resulting in high cardiovascular risk in early childhood. Lipid apheresis (LA) is an effective treatment and should be started as early as possible to prevent premature cardiovascular events. As peripheral punctures in children can be challenging due to small vessels and anxiety, this study aimed to evaluate feasibility and safety of central venous catheters (CVCs) as vascular access for LA in young children with hoFH.

Methods

Retrospective analysis (2016-2019) on four children with hoFH aged 3-5 years, performing weekly or biweekly LA with a CVC.

Results

LDL-C decreased by> 60%. In three children, the use of a permanent CVC for 698, 595, and 411 days, respectively, avoided difficult peripheral access, without the occurrence of occlusion or thrombosis. Unfortunately, one child had recurrent CVC-related infections and needed an arteriovenous fistula from the age of 5. Although the mean dwell time per catheter was 212 days, there were, as expected, severe side effects of early catheter infections with sepsis and accidental self-removal. Starting LA at an early age improved or stabilized carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) in three children. However, IMT did increase in one child caused by intolerance to peripheral punctures and LA interruption.

Conclusions

Permanent CVCs are a viable temporary access choice for LA in young children with hoFH until peripheral venipuncture is practicable. The risk of CVC-related infections needs to be taken into account.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12887-022-03192-7.

Vascular Access in Therapeutic Apheresis: One Size Does not Fit All

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic apheresis has been used in treating hematological and non-hematological diseases. For a successful procedure, efficient vascular access is required. Presently, peripheral venous access (PVA), central venous catheterization (CVC), implantable ports, and arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) are used. This review aims to evaluate different type of access and their pros and cons to help physicians determine the best venous access.

METHODS

The electronic search included PubMed and Google Scholar up to Nov. 2020. The Mesh terms were apheresis, peripheral catheterization, central catheterization, and arteriovenous fistula.

RESULTS

A total of 228 studies were found through database searching. Two independent authors reviewed the articles using their titles and abstracts; 88 articles were selected and the full text was reviewed. Finally, 25 were included. The inclusion criteria were studies incorporating patients with any indication for apheresis.

CONCLUSION

PVA has been promoted in recent years in many centers across the United States to lower the rate of complications associated with vascular access and to make this procedure more accessible. Several factors are involved in selecting appropriate venous access, such as the procedure's duration and frequency, patient's vascular anatomy, and staff's experience. In short-term procedures, temporary vascular access like PVA or CVC is preferred. Permanent vascular access such as AVF, tunneled cuffed central lines, and implantable ports are more beneficial in prolonged treatment period but each patient has to be evaluated individually by apheresis team for the most appropriate method.

Major adverse cardiovascular events in homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

Homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (HoFH) is a genetic condition characterized by extremely elevated levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and death. Due to its rarity, accurate assessment of cardiovascular outcomes associated with HoFH and how they have changed over time has been challenging. The goal of this study was to assess the prevalence and age-of-onset of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) among patients with HoFH.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Pubmed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, Africa-Wide, Google Scholar, Open Grey, and various clinical trial registries from inception to February 2020 to identify studies reporting on MACE in HoFH patients. We determined the pooled prevalence and mean age-of-onset of MACE outcomes individually using a random effects inverse variance model. We identified 94 studies that met our eligibility criteria. Myocardial infarction and coronary revascularization were common with a prevalence of 15.1% [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 10.7-20.0] and 28.3% (95% CI 22.5-34.3), respectively. The mean age-of-onset was 24.5 (95% CI 19.2-29.8) years for myocardial infarction and 32.2 (95% CI 26.6-37.8) years for revascularization. Sub-group analyses based on the year of publication revealed significant delays in the onset of MACE outcomes post-1990 compared to pre-1990. Egger's regression suggested possible bias, likely due to small study effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease is common among HoFH patients and occurs at a young age. Age-of-onset of myocardial infarction was delayed by more than a decade from pre-1990 to post-1990, likely attributable to widespread use of statins and other therapies, reflecting substantial progress in the management of this rare but severe disorder.

Health-related quality of life in homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) is a rare genetic disease characterized by extreme elevations of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and extremely premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. To date, impacts of HoFH and its treatment on the psychosocial wellbeing of patients have been poorly characterized.

OBJECTIVES

We performed a systematic review of the association between HoFH and health-related quality of life (HRQL).

METHODS

This review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) consensus guidelines. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, The Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL), Pubmed, Scopus, AfricaWide (via EBSCO), and six trial registries and grey-literature databases from inception to May 2021 for published English-language literature examining HRQL and its determinants in HoFH. Studies were eligible if they included patients with confirmed HoFH and evaluated HRQL using validated tools. We performed a narrative synthesis of qualitative findings from included studies and, where data permitted, random-effects meta-analysis reporting standardized mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Our review identified seven eligible studies examining HRQL in HoFH participants. Pooling data from two included studies, we found that relative to the general population, HoFH patients demonstrated significantly poorer HRQL in multiple dimensions of the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) with lower scores in physical functioning (SMD -0.37; 95% CI: -0.60, -0.15), role limitations due to physical health (SMD -0.63; 95% CI: -1.24, -0.02), social functioning (SMD -0.61; 95% CI: -1.19, -0.03), bodily pain (SMD -0.24; 95% CI: -0.46, -0.01), and general health (SMD -1.55; 95% CI: -1.80, -1.31). No differences were observed in domains of energy and vitality, mental health and emotional well-being, or role limitations due to emotional problems. Patients suffered high treatment burdens related to lipoprotein apheresis that compromised educational attainment and employment. However, few patients received psychological support in navigating their treatment challenges. No studies evaluated the association of HoFH with incident anxiety, depression, or other psychopathology.

CONCLUSIONS

Limited data are available on quality of life for patients with HoFH. The available data suggest that these patients may suffer disease-related impairments in quality of life. Future work should aim to elucidate relationships between HoFH and mental health outcomes and develop interventions to improve quality of life in this population.

Use of apheresis in the age of new therapies for familial hypercholesterolaemia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Lipoprotein apheresis has been first line therapy for homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) and other severe and refractory forms of dyslpidaemia for over 40 years but the recent advent of novel and potent LDL-lowering compounds necessitates a reappraisal of its role.

RECENT FINDINGS

During the past decade a substantial amount of evidence has accumulated describing the effect of LDL-lowering with apheresis and conventional drug therapy upon the cardiovascular outcomes associated with homozygous and statin-refractory heterozygous FH. This has necessitated re-defining the target levels of LDL cholesterol needed to arrest progression of atherosclerosis in these situations. At the same time, evidence has accrued regarding the pathogenicity of raised levels of lipoprotein (a) and the promising role of apheresis in mitigating the adverse effects of the latter. The latest advance in treatment has been the introduction of three classes of novel and potent LDL-lowering compounds in the shape of inhibitors of Propertin convertase subtilisin kexin 9 (PCSK9), microsomal triglyceride transfer protein and angiopoietin-like 3.

SUMMARY

These recent developments raise the question of whether these compounds will be used as adjuvants to bolster lipoprotein apheresis in FH homozygotes or whether they will render it obsolete, as is already occurring with PCSK9 inhibitors in FH heterozygotes.

Just not cosmesis! Role of low-density lipoprotein apheresis in familial hypercholesterolemia: Experience at a newly developed tertiary care institution in Northern India

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is characterized by an increase in plasma low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. It presents with tendon/skin xanthomas and premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. The most available treatment options for FH are lipid-lowering medications such as statins, lifestyle modification, and LDL apheresis. As per American Society for Apheresis guidelines 2019, the treatment of FH using LDL apheresis falls under Category I. Here, we are reporting an interesting case of a young patient who presented with chief complaints of progressively increasing yellowish lesions around eyes, neck, hands, and legs. She was thoroughly investigated and was diagnosed provisionally as a case of Type 2 FH. Her total serum cholesterol and LDL-C were 717.2 mg/dl and 690.6 mg/dl, respectively, at presentation. One cycle of LDL apheresis was planned for her. We found immediate post-procedural reduction of 55.8% and 55.3% for total serum and LDL cholesterol levels respectively while 70.58% and 77.41% reduction in the levels from the day of presentation to the hospital.

Familial hypercholesterolemia in Southeast and East Asia

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a relatively common autosomal dominant disorder associated with a significantly increased risk of coronary heart disease (CHD). Most (~85-90%) cases are due to pathogenic variants in the LDL-receptor gene (LDLR), while the remaining are due to pathogenic variants in the apolipoprotein B (APOB) and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) genes, though the proportion may vary depending on geographic location. Even though at least a quarter of the world's FH population lives in Southeast and East Asia, there are substantial gaps in knowledge regarding the epidemiology of FH due to low awareness, the absence of national screening programs, and limited availability of genetic testing. In this review, we discuss the most recent and relevant information available related to diagnostic criteria, prevalence, awareness, clinical characteristics, genetic epidemiology, and treatment in the FH population of Southeast and East Asia. Increasing awareness and improving the diagnosis and management of FH will reduce the burden of premature CHD in these regions of the world.

Lipoprotein apheresis efficacy and challenges: single center experience

Introduction

Lipoprotein apheresis (LA) is an extracorporeal therapy which removes apolipoprotein B-containing particles from the circulation. We evaluated techniques and efficiency of lipoprotein apheresis procedures applied to patients with familial and non-familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) at our center.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated 250 LA procedures applied to 27 patients with dyslipidemia between March 2011 and August 2019.

Results

A total of 27 patients, of whom 19 (70.4%) were male and 8 (29.6%), female, were included. Eighteen (66.7%), 6 (22.2%) and 3 (11.1%) patients were diagnosed with non-FH, homozygous FH (HoFH) and heterozygous FH (HeFH), respectively. Two different apheresis techniques, direct adsorption of lipoproteins (DALI) (48.8%) and double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) (51.2%), were used. The change in the serum total cholesterol (TC) level was the median 302 mg/dl (171–604 mg/dl) (60.4%) in HoFH patients, 305 mg/dl (194–393 mg/dl) (60.8%) in HeFH patients and 227 mg/dl (75–749 mg/dl) (65.3%) in non-FH patients. The change in the serum low-density lipoprotein (LDL) level was the median 275 mg/dl (109–519 mg/dl) (64.2%), 232 mg/dl (207–291 mg/dl) (64.5%) and 325 mg/dl (22–735 mg/dl) (70.9%) in patients with HoFH, HeFH and non-FH, respectively. A significantly effective reduction in serum lipid levels, including TC, LDL and triglycerides, was achieved in all patients, regardless of the technique, p < .001. The decrease in the serum TC and LDL levels was significantly higher in the DFPP, compared to the DALI, being 220 mg/dl (−300 to 771) vs 184 mg/dl (64–415), p < .001 and 196 mg/dl (11–712) vs 157 mg/dl (54–340), p < .001, respectively.

Conclusions

Our results showed that LA is a highly effective treatment in reducing serum lipid levels and safe, without any major adverse event.

LDL Apheresis and Lp (a) Apheresis: A Clinician's Perspective

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Lipoprotein apheresis is the most effective means of lipid-lowering therapy. However, it's a semi-invasive, time consuming, and chronic therapy with variable adherence. There are still no specific guideline recommendations for the management of patients on lipid apheresis. The purpose of this review is to discuss the clinical indications and major drawbacks of lipid apheresis in the light of recent evidence.

RECENT FINDINGS

Lipoprotein apheresis should be initiated at early ages and performed frequently to receive the expected cardiovascular benefits. However, in clinical practice, most patients experience ineffective apheresis and fail to reach lipid targets. This real-world failure is due to several factors including late diagnosis, delayed referral, and improper frequency of procedures. All these denote that awareness is still low among physicians. Another important factor is the semi-invasive, time consuming nature of the apheresis, leading to high refusal and low adherence rates. Moreover, apheresis decreases quality of life and increases the risk of depression. Mental status is also deteriorated in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia on lipid apheresis. New effective lipid lowering agents are underway with promising cardiovascular results. To overcome the drawbacks, a structured approach, including standardized protocols for lipoprotein apheresis with regular cardiovascular follow-up is warranted. New effective lipid lowering agents with documented cardiovascular benefit, should be integrated into the treatment algorithms of patients on lipoprotein apheresis.

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol lowering therapy for the secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is highly prevalent and a major contributor to morbidity and mortality worldwide. Elevated blood cholesterol is a key driver of risk for atherosclerotic events, and patients with established ASCVD comprise a specific high-risk population in which low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering therapy is strongly endorsed by multiple guidelines. An increasing number of medications across several pharmacologic classes are available today in clinical practice. Therefore, guidance on the appropriate use of these interventions is necessary for cost-effective solutions to managing residual atherothrombotic risk. In this review we summarize the key evidence supporting LDL-C lowering as described in the most recent 2018 multi-society Blood Cholesterol Guidelines, and provide a framework for optimizing LDL-C lowering therapy in secondary prevention populations.

Plaque Regression and Endothelial Progenitor Cell Mobilization With Intensive Lipid Elimination Regimen (PREMIER)

BACKGROUND

Low-density lipoproteins (LDLs) are removed by extracorporeal filtration during LDL apheresis. It is mainly used in familial hyperlipidemia. The PREMIER trial (Plaque Regression and Progenitor Cell Mobilization With Intensive Lipid Elimination Regimen) evaluated LDL apheresis in nonfamilial hyperlipidemia acute coronary syndrome patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention.

METHODS

We randomized 160 acute coronary syndrome patients at 4 Veterans Affairs centers within 72 hours of percutaneous coronary intervention to intensive lipid-lowering therapy (ILLT) comprising single LDL apheresis and statins versus standard medical therapy (SMT) with no LDL apheresis and statin therapy alone. Trial objectives constituted primary safety and primary efficacy end points and endothelial progenitor cell colony-forming unit mobilization in peripheral blood.

RESULTS

Mean LDL reduction at discharge was 53% in ILLT and 17% in SMT groups (P<0.0001) from baseline levels of 116.3±34.3 and 110.7±32 mg/dL (P=0.2979), respectively. The incidence of the primary safety end point of major peri-percutaneous coronary intervention adverse events was similar in both groups (ILLT, 3; SMT, 0). The primary efficacy end point, percentage change in total plaque volume at 90 days by intravascular ultrasound, on average decreased by 4.81% in the ILLT group and increased by 2.31% in the SMT group (difference of means, -7.13 [95% CI, -14.59 to 0.34]; P=0.0611). The raw change in total plaque volume on average decreased more in the ILLT group than in the SMT group (-6.01 versus -0.95 mm³; difference of means, -5.06 [95% CI, -11.61 to 1.48]; P=0.1286). Similar results were obtained after adjusting for participating sites, age, preexisting coronary artery disease, diabetes mellitus, baseline LDL levels, and baseline plaque burden. There was robust endothelial progenitor cell colony-forming unit mobilization from baseline to 90 days in the ILLT group (P=0.0015) but not in SMT (P=0.0844).

CONCLUSIONS

PREMIER is the first randomized clinical trial to demonstrate safety and a trend for early coronary plaque regression with LDL apheresis in nonfamilial hyperlipidemia acute coronary syndrome patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01004406 and NCT02347098.

Therapeutic Options for Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia: The Role of Lomitapide

Background:

Lomitapide (Juxtapid® in US and Lojuxta® in Europe) is the first developed inhibitor of the Microsomal Triglyceride Transfer Protein (MTP) approved as a novel drug for the management of Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia (HoFH). It acts by binding directly and selectively to MTP thus decreasing the assembly and secretion of the apo-B containing lipoproteins both in the liver and in the intestine.

Aims:

The present review aims at summarizing the recent knowledge on lomitapide in the management of HoFH.

Results:

The efficacy and safety of lomitapide have been evaluated in several trials and it has been shown a reduction of the plasma levels of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) by an average of more than 50%. Although the most common side effects are gastrointestinal and liver events, lomitapide presents generally with a good tolerability and satisfactory patients compliance. Recently, in Europe, to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of lomitapide, the LOWER registry (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02135705) has been established in order to acquire informations on HoFH lomitapidetreated patients from “real life” clinical practice.

:

Furthermore, the observation that lomitapide decreases triglyceride levels may be considered for patients affected by severe forms of hypertriglyceridemia who undergo recurrent episodes of pancreatitis and are poor responders to conventional treatment.

Conclusion:

Lomitapide represents an innovative and efficacious drug for the treatment of HoFH. Longterm safety data, treatment of pediatric and pregnant HoFH patients and management of severe hypertriglyceridemia still require further investigations.

Mental status and physical activity in patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: A subgroup analysis of a nationwide survey (A-HIT1 registry)

BACKGROUND

Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) is a rare, life-threatening disease due to high serum low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels. LDL cholesterol-lowering interventions are fundamental for patients with HoFH.

OBJECTIVE

It was aimed to investigate the association between the mental status of patients with HoFH and healthy lifestyle behaviors.

METHODS

This subgroup analysis of the A-HIT1 population included the data of patients aged ≥18 years with a clinical diagnosis of HoFH undergoing therapeutic LDL apheresis. Besides the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients, healthy lifestyle behaviors were assessed, and psychiatric symptoms were screened by Symptom Check List (SCL-90-R).

RESULTS

The highest percentage for pathology was observed in dimensions of obsessive-compulsive, somatization, interpersonal sensitivity, and depression in SCL-90-R. Patients with any cardiovascular condition have more psychiatric symptoms in different fields of SCL-90-R. The outcomes of the correlative analysis indicated that lower the age of the first coronary event better the psychiatric status, probably denoting a better adaptation to disease and its treatment. Among 68 patients, 36 patients were not exercising regularly. Patients with regular physical activity had significantly lower scores in most dimensions of SCL-90-R and there was no association between regular physical activity and other investigated variables. The strongest predictor of regular exercising was global severity index of SCL-90-R.

CONCLUSION

In the HoFH population, there was a high prevalence of mental disturbances. Better psychiatric status was associated with regular exercising. Therefore, assessing the mental status of patients with HoFH and referring patients in need, to a psychiatrist, may improve the outcome of patients.

Lipoprotein apheresis in Germany - Still more commonly indicated than implemented. How can patients in need access therapy?

BACKGROUND

Although lipid-lowering drugs, especially statins, and recently also PCSK9 inhibitors can reduce LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) and decrease the risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) including coronary artery disease (CAD) events most efficiently, only 5-10% of high-risk cardiovascular patients reach the target values recommended by international guidelines. In patients who cannot be treated adequately by drugs it is possible to reduce increased LDL-C and/or lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) values by the use of lipoprotein apheresis (LA) with the potential to decrease severe CVD events in the range of 70%->80%. Even in Germany, a country with well-established reimbursement guidelines for LA, knowledge about this life-saving therapy is unsatisfactory in medical disciplines treating patients with CVD. Starting in 1996 our aim was to offer LA treatment following current guidelines for all patients in the entire region of our clinic as standard of care.

METHODS

Based on the experience of our large apheresis competence center overlooking now nearly 80,000 LA treatments in the last two decades, we depict the necessary structure for identification of patients, defining indication, referral, implementation and standardisation of therapy as well as for reimbursement. LA is unfamiliar for most patients and even for many practitioners and consultants. Therefore nephrologists performing more than 90% of LA in Germany have to form a network for referral and ongoing medical education, comprising all regional care-givers, general practitioners as well as the respective specialists and insurances or other cost bearing parties for offering a scientifically approved therapeutic regimen and comprehensive care. The German Lipid Association (Lipid-Liga) has implemented the certification of a lipidological competence center as an appropriate way to realize such a network structure.

RESULTS

Working as a lipidological and apheresis competence center in a region of 400,000 to 500,000 inhabitants, today we treat 160 patients in the chronic LA program. In spite of the availability of PCSK9 inhibitors since 2015, LA has remained as an indispensable therapeutic option for targeted lipid lowering treatment. An analysis of nearly 37,000 LA treatments in our own center documented a >80% reduction of cardiovascular events in patients treated by regular LA when comparing with the situation before the start of the LA therapy. We have implemented the concept of an apheresis competence center characterised by ongoing medical education with a focus on lipidological and cardiovascular aspects, interdisciplinary networking and referral.

CONCLUSIONS

Incidence and prevalence of LA patients in our region demonstrate that based on our ongoing patient-centered approach the access of patients in need to LA is substantially above the German average, thus contributing to an extraordinary reduction of cardiovascular events in the population we in particular feel responsible for.

Guidelines on the Use of Therapeutic Apheresis in Clinical Practice - Evidence-Based Approach from the Writing Committee of the American Society for Apheresis: The Eighth Special Issue

The American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) Journal of Clinical Apheresis (JCA) Special Issue Writing Committee is charged with reviewing, updating and categorizing indications for the evidence-based use of therapeutic apheresis (TA) in human disease. Since the 2007 JCA Special Issue (Fourth Edition), the committee has incorporated systematic review and evidence-based approaches in the grading and categorization of apheresis indications. This Eighth Edition of the JCA Special Issue continues to maintain this methodology and rigor in order to make recommendations on the use of apheresis in a wide variety of diseases/conditions. The JCA Eighth Edition, like its predecessor, continues to apply the category and grading system definitions in fact sheets. The general layout and concept of a fact sheet that was introduced in the Fourth Edition, has largely been maintained in this edition. Each fact sheet succinctly summarizes the evidence for the use of TA in a specific disease entity or medical condition. The Eighth Edition comprises 84 fact sheets for relevant diseases and medical conditions, with 157 graded and categorized indications and/or TA modalities. The Eighth Edition of the JCA Special Issue seeks to continue to serve as a key resource that guides the utilization of TA in the treatment of human disease.

Familial Hypercholesterolemia and Lipoprotein Apheresis

Lipoprotein apheresis has been developed as the treatment for refractory familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) to remove low-density lipoprotein (LDL), which is the main pathogenic factor. Currently, three procedures are available in Japan, including the plasma exchange, double-membrane filtration, and selective LDL adsorption. Selective LDL adsorption, which was developed in Japan, has been one of the most common treatment methods in the world. Lipoprotein apheresis enabled the prevention of atherosclerosis progression even in homozygous FH (HoFH) patients. However, in our observational study, HoFH patients who started lipoprotein apheresis in adulthood had a poorer prognosis than those who started in childhood. Therefore, HoFH patients need to start lipoprotein apheresis as early as possible. Although the indication for lipoprotein apheresis in heterozygous FH (HeFH) patients has been decreasing with the advent of strong statins, our observational study showed that HeFH patients who discontinued lipoprotein apheresis had a poorer prognosis than patients who continued apheresis therapy. These results suggest that it is beneficial for very-high-risk HeFH patients to be treated by lipoprotein apheresis even if their LDL cholesterol is controlled well by lipid-lowering agents. Since launching a new class of lipid-lowering agents, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) antibody and microsome triglyceride transfer protein inhibitors, the indication for lipoprotein apheresis in FH has been changing. However, despite the development of these drugs, lipoprotein apheresis is still an option with a high therapeutic effect for FH patients with severe atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

Long-term lipoprotein apheresis in the treatment of severe familial hypercholesterolemia refractory to high intensity statin therapy: Three year experience at a lipoprotein apheresis centre

BACKGROUND

Severe familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) individuals, refractory to conventional lipidlowering medications are at exceptionally high risk of cardiovascular events. The established therapeutic option of last choice is lipoprotein apheresis (LA). Herein, it was sought to investigate the clinical usefulness of LA in a highly selected group of severe heterozygous FH (HeFH), as recently described by the International Atherosclerosis Society (IAS), for their efficacy in lipid reduction and safety.

METHODS

Efficacy and safety of LA were investigated in 318 sessions of 7 severe HeFH females with cardiovascular disease, over a mean period of 26.9 ± 6.5 months. Relative reduction of low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) ≥ 60%, clinical complications and vascular access problems were evaluated and compared between the direct adsorption of lipoproteins (DALI) and lipoprotein filtration (Membrane Filtration Optimized Novel Extracorporeal Treatment [MONET]). Additionally, lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)], total cholesterol (TC), high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), triglycerides (TG) and fibrinogen concentrations were investigated.

RESULTS

The relative reduction of LDL-C, TC, TG and Lp(a) were 69.4 ± 12.9%, 59.7 ± 9.1, 51.5 ± ± 14.2% and 71.3 ± 14.4%, respectively. A similar efficacy was found in both systems in LDL-C removal. DALI system led to larger depletions of Lp(a) (80.0 [76-83]% vs. 73.0 [64.7-78.8]%; p < 0.001). The frequency of clinical side effects and vascular access problems were low (8.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term LA in severe HeFH individuals is safe and efficiently reduces LDL-C and Lp(a). Higher efficacy of the DALI system than MONET in Lp(a) removal may indicate the need for individualized application of the LA system in severe HeFH individuals.

Apheresis to Mitigate Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic apheresis is a term used to describe a group of treatments where blood components are separated in real time, and one component is removed, exchanged, and/or treated to remove pathogenic substances from the circulation. Plasma exchange, which removed all plasma components, and lipid apheresis which selectively removes lipoproteins from circulation, have both been used to treat atherosclerotic vascular diseases.

METHODS

To review the literature regarding the application of therapeutic apheresis for atherosclerotic vascular diseases.

RESULTS

Primarily lipid apheresis is used to treat atherosclerotic vascular diseases, particularly familial hypercholesterolemia, lipoprotein (a) hyperlipoproteinemia and peripheral vascular diseases. Lipid apheresis can be used as first line or second line treatment with a strong evidenced-based recommendation. Its use has decreased atherosclerotic events.

CONCLUSION

Lipid apheresis is an important therapy for the treatment of familial hypercholesterolemia, lipoprotein (a) hyperlipoproteinemia and peripheral vascular diseases. Lipid apheresis does more than remove low-density lipoproteins and other lipoproteins but also decreases inflammatory markers and improves blood flow.

Current Role of Lipoprotein Apheresis in the Treatment of High-Risk Patients

Lipoprotein apheresis (LA) is a therapeutic approach to save the lives of patients who are at an extremely high risk of developing cardiovascular events (CVE), especially after all other therapeutic options were not tolerated, or appeared not to be effective enough. Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia represents a clear indication to start LA therapy. Another recognized indication is a severe hypercholesterolemia, which induced CVE, often in association with other risk factors. In the last years, an expressive elevation of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) emerged as an indication for LA. In Germany, progress of atherosclerosis should have been documented before the permission to start LA therapy is given in these patients. Usually, all LA methods acutely decrease both LDL-C and Lp(a). However, specific columns which reduce only Lp(a) are available. Case reports and prospective observations comparing the situation before and during LA therapy clearly show a high efficiency with respect to the reduction of CVE, especially in patients with high Lp(a) levels. PCSK9 inhibitors may reduce the need for LA in patients with heterozygous or polygenetic hypercholesterolemia, but in some patients, a combination of these drugs with LA will be necessary. In the future, an antisense oligonucleotide against apolipoprotein(a) may offer an alternative therapeutic approach.

Intraindividual Comparison of the Impact of two Selective Apheresis Methods (DALI and HELP) on the Coagulation System

We performed an intraindividual comparison of the effect on the coagulation system of two selective apheresis procedures: Direct Adsorption of Lipoproteins (DALI) and Heparin-induced Lipoprotein Fibrinogen Precipitation (HELP). Six patients suffering from heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia have been treated with 2 sessions of each procedure. Anticoagulation was carried out according to usual recommendations. Blood samples were taken before, immediately after and on the second day after the sessions. We assessed global coagulation tests (prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time), fibrinogen, prothrombin fragment F 1 + 2 and a variety of factors (Factors II, V, VII, XIII, IX, X, XI, XII, XIIa; von Willebrand Factor; collagen-binding activity, prekallikrein, high-molecular weight kininogen) and antagonists (antithrombin III, protein S activity, free protein S). In fact, all parameters measured have been influenced by the apheresis treatment. Fibrinogen is lowered more by HELP, which also has a more definite impact on factors belonging to the prothrombin complex (II, VII, X). In contrast, the major effects of the DALI system have been seen on the intrinsic pathway of the coagulation system (IX, XI, prekallikrein, high-molecular-weight kininogen). With both systems, no increases in activated Factor XII or in prothrombin fragment F1 + 2 have been observed. These data provide a solid basis for individual adaptations of anticoagulant doses.

Retrospective Comparison of 5 different Methods for Long-Term LDL-Apheresis in 20 Patients between 1986 and 2001

Purpose

To compare long-term efficacy and biocompatibility of the 5 most commonly applied LDL-apheresis techniques using a specifically modified calculation method of the area under the curve (AUC) for laboratory parameters.

Design

Retrospective long-term analysis of 20 patients with homozygous or severe heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia.

Procedures

The following 5 extra-corporeal LDL-apheresis methods were compared: IMAL (Immuno Adsorption of Lipoproteins), DSA (Dextran Sulphate Adsorption), HELP (Heparin Induced Extra-corporeal LDL Precipitation), DALI (Direct Adsorption of Lipoproteins), MDF (Membrane Differential Filtration).

Main outcome measures

AUC derived plasma concentrations (CAUC) of lipoproteins between two apheresis procedures and their long-term course. Comparison of biocompatibility and efficacy concerning the LDL-C target of < 2.6 mmol/L of 5 apheresis techniques. Progression of atherosclerosis in patients with severe hypercholesterolemia.

Main findings

The means of AUC derived average plasma concentrations (CAUC) of all treatment intervals were for LDL-C and the LDL/HDL ratio as follows: IMAL (5.59 mmol/L; ratio 4.1), DSA (3.03 mmol/L; ratio 2.0), HELP (4.06 mmol/L; ratio 2.2), DALI (3.83 mmol/L; ratio 3.3), MDF (3.26 mmol/L; ratio 3.2). Coronary heart disease and cardiac events (myocardial infarction, PTCA/ stent implantation, CABG) progressed in only 2 patients whereas atherosclerosis manifestations (sclerosis abdominal aorta, carotid artery stenosis, peripheral vascular disease) worsened in 13 patients. Mean ergometric capacity improved from 112 to 118 Watt.

Conclusions

All 5 apheresis methods (IMAL, DSA, HELP, DALI, MDF) proved to be safe and suitable for long-term treatment in patients with severe hypercholesterolemia. The introduction of the CAUC revealed that the target of LDL-C < 2.6 mmol/L was not achieved with regard to the time averaged concentration (CAUC).

LDL-apheresis in Acute Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy

Acute anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (AION) is a disabling disease which impairs visual function. Standard treatment is unable to affect the outcome and the visual damage persists. We describe the case of a 64-year-old patient affected by AION, whose only known risk factor was hypercholesterolemia. After a first onset of involvement of the right eye (RE), the patient presented four weeks later with an analogous episode affecting the left eye (LE). Since standard treatment, started at involvement of the RE, had not yielded any beneficial effect, the patient underwent three sessions of LDL apheresis. The scotomatous portion of the visual field reduced even after the first session, there was further improvement after the third, and after six months the condition remained stable. Corrected vision improved from 2/10 to 6/10 after the third session. LDL cholesterol and fibrinogen decresade after the third session from 239 mg/dL to 31 mg/dL and from 289 mg/dL to 92 mg/dL, respectively. In conclusion, thanks to its effect of antagonizing hemorheologic disorders of the ocular microcirculation, LDL apheresis seems to be an efficacious treatment of AION, especially in patients suffering from hypercholesterolemia.

H.E.L.P apheresis exerts long term effects on the capacity of circulating proangiogenic cells

BACKGROUND

Severe forms of mono- and polygenetic hypercholesterolemia as well as elevated Lipoprotein (a) (LP(a)) with progressing cardiovascular (CV) disease are indication for lipoprotein apheresis (LA) in Germany. Many studies investigated pleiotropic effects of LA that might contribute to beneficial effects in advanced atherosclerosis. The present study aimed at investigating the potential role of Proangiogenic Cells (PAC) in patients with new onset or chronic LA using the heparin induced extracorporeal LDL-precipitation (H.E.L.P.) apheresis system.

METHODS

Patients (n = 10) new to LA and HELP treatment were investigated immediately before, shortly after, 24 h later and 4 weeks following LA. Peripheral blood was used to count PAC in circulation via flow cytometry. In a second step, blood cells from patients were cultured in endothelial selective medium and further evaluated for adhesion in fibronectin coated chamber slides and migratory capacity (stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1) induced migration).

RESULTS

Cells expressing typical EPC markers were rarely detected in blood samples. No differences occurred over time in CD34⁺; CD34⁺ CD133⁺ CD45^-; CD34⁺/KDR⁺ and CXCR4⁺/CD14⁺ positive PAC. We found no differences in cell adhesion at the different time points, while significantly more cells migrated into the SDF-1 medium following four weeks of continuing apheresis therapy.

CONCLUSION

Using well established systems, this study was not able to demonstrate relevant acute effects of LA on PAC in patients new to LA. The increased migratory capacity of PAC might be an indicator of chronic beneficial pleiotropic effects in patients undergoing H.E.L.P. apheresis.

Vascular access in lipoprotein apheresis: a retrospective analysis from the UK's largest lipoprotein apheresis centre

INTRODUCTION

Lipoprotein apheresis (LA) has proven to be an effective, safe and life-saving therapy. Vascular access is needed to facilitate this treatment but has recognised complications. Despite consistency in treatment indication and duration there are no guidelines in place. The aim of this study is to characterise vascular access practice at the UK's largest LA centre and forward suggestions for future approaches.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of vascular access strategies was undertaken in all patients who received LA treatment in the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) Apheresis Unit at Harefield Hospital (Middlesex, UK) from November 2000 to March 2016.

RESULTS

Fifty-three former and current patients underwent 4260 LA treatments. Peripheral vein cannulation represented 79% of initial vascular access strategies with arteriovenous (AV) fistula use accounting for 15%. Last used method of vascular access was peripheral vein cannulation in 57% versus AV fistula in 32%. Total AV fistula failure rate was 37%.

CONCLUSIONS

Peripheral vein cannulation remains the most common method to facilitate LA. Practice trends indicate a move towards AV fistula creation; the favoured approach receiving support from the expert body in this area. AV fistula failure rate is high and of great concern, therefore we suggest the implementation of upper limb ultrasound vascular mapping in all patients who meet treatment eligibility criteria. We encourage close ties between apheresis units and specialist surgical centres to facilitate patient counselling and monitoring. Further prospective data regarding fistula failure is needed in this expanding treatment field.

Lipoprotein apheresis in the treatment of dyslipidaemia - the Czech Republic experience

In 1984, we started using therapeutic plasmapheresis (plasma exchange) as a method of extracorporeal lipoprotein elimination for the treatment of hypercholesterolemic patients. We evaluated the results of long-term therapy in 14 patients, 8 men and 6 women. The average age was 55.6+/-13.2 (range 28-70), median 59.5 years. 14 patients were diagnosed with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH): 5 homozygous, 9 heterozygous. Ten patients in the group were treated using immunoadsorption lipoprotein apheresis and 4 using hemorheopheresis. Immunoapheretic interventions decreased LDL-cholesterol (82+/-1 %), ApoB (73+/-13 %) and even Lp(a) by 82+/-19 %, respectively. Selected non-invasive methods are important for long-term and repeated follow-up. Carotid intima-media thickness showed improvement or stagnation in 75 % of the patients. Biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction such as endoglin (in the control group: 3.85+/-1.25 microg/l, in lipoprotein apheresis-treated hypercholesterolemic individuals 5.74+/-1.47 microg/l), CD40 ligand (before lipoprotein apheresis: 6498+/-2529 ng/l, after lipoprotein apheresis: 4057+/-2560 ng/l) and neopterin (before lipoprotein apheresis: 5.7+/-1.1 nmol/l, after lipoprotein apheresis: 5.5+/-1.3 nmol/l) related to the course of atherosclerosis, but did not reflect the actual activity of the disease nor facilitate the prediction or planning of therapy. Hemorheopheresis may improve blood flow in microcirculation in familial hypercholesterolemia and also in some other microcirculation disorders via significantly decreased activity of thrombomodulin (p<0.0001), tissue factor (p<0.0001), aggregation of thrombocytes (p<0.0001) and plasma and whole blood viscosity (p<0.0001). In conclusion, lipoprotein apheresis and hemorheopheresis substantially lowered LDL-cholesterol in severe hypercholesterolemia. Our experience with long-term therapy also shows good tolerance and a small number of complications (6.26 % non-serious clinical complications).

Current insights into the German lipoprotein apheresis standard: PCSK9-inhibitors, lipoprotein apheresis or both?

According to current European guidelines, lipid lowering therapy for progressive cardiovascular disease including cardiovascular events has to be focused on a target level for LDL-C. In contrast for Lp(a) a threshold has to be defined with respect to the method of measurement. However, due to new lipid lowering drug developments like PCSK9-inhibitors (PCSK-9-I) a therapeutic algorithm for patients with severe hypercholesterolemia or isolated Lipoprotein(a)-hyperlipoproteinemia with progressive cardiovascular disease may be necessary to manage the use of PCSK9-I, lipoprotein apheresis (LA) or both. The therapeutic approach for patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia is unambiguous: In addition to LA, in order to improve LDL-C reduction, PCSK9-I could be applied. In patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, PCSK9-I is to be applied first. If in addition to a pronounced LDL-C elevation, cardiovascular complications exist or if imaging techniques documented atherosclerotic changes pre-disposing for a cardiovascular event while LDL-C reduction is insufficiently reduced (LDL-C > 100 mg/dl (2.6 mmol/l)), LA treatment should then be applied as last resort. In patients with elevated Lp(a) concentrations (Lp(a) > 60 mg/dl (>120 nmol/l)) and established cardiovascular disease, therapy should rely primarily on LA methods. If in addition to high Lp(a) levels insufficiently treated LDL-C concentrations (LDL-C > 100 mg/dl (2.6 mmol/l)) exist, in rare cases PCSK9-I can supplement the lipid lowering concept.

Long-term follow-up of circulating oxidative stress markers in patients undergoing lipoprotein apheresis by Direct Adsorption of Lipids (DALI)

OBJECTIVE

Beyond its well-established efficacy in lowering atherogenic lipids and lipoproteins, DALI (Direct Adsorption of Lipids) apheresis has been shown to have acute anti-inflammatory and endothelium-protective effects. In the present study, we investigated long-term effects of DALI procedures on circulating oxidative stress markers.

METHODS

Thirteen patients involved in the study underwent regular DALI apheresis for nearly two years. At sessions 1, 40 and 80 conventional lipid status and changes of systemic oxidative stress markers (oxidized LDL, anti-oxidized LDL antibodies, advanced oxidation protein products (AOPP), and myeloperoxidase (MPO)) were examined.

RESULTS

DALI procedure efficiently reduced atherogenic lipids/lipoproteins. On day three after apheresis lipid parameters returned to pre-apheresis values. They showed no tendency to increase or to decrease over time. No significant differences were found between 1st, 40th and 80th sessions. In a similar way, levels of oxidative stress biomarkers acutely decreased after apheresis sessions and rebounded on day three after apheresis. No significant differences were observed between sessions 1, 40, and 80.

CONCLUSION

DALI apheresis repeatedly decreases atherogenic lipid/lipoprotein profile and oxidative stress biomarker levels during each session. Among all investigated parameters no longitudinal effects over two years could be observed.

[PCSK9 inhibitors : Current clinical relevance]

BACKGROUND

Hypercholesterolemias are known risk factors for cardiovascular diseases. Although statins have reduced the cardiovascular morbidity and mortality and further therapeutic measures are available, treatment goals are often not achieved. In cases of very high levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol or of intolerability, the established therapies are often not sufficiently effective or cannot be used in adequate doses. For these high-risk patients further treatment options are required.

OBJECTIVES

The current clinical relevance of the new substance class of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors for the treatment of hypercholesterolemias is presented on the basis of the available data and the German regulations.

CURRENT DATA

The two PCSK9 inhibitors, evolocumab and alirocumab, were approved in 2015. Data from many different patient groups are available for both substances. The significant reduction of LDL cholesterol of 50-60% and the very good tolerability and safety profile (at placebo level) are shown for both substances. The PCSK9 inhibitors are not as effective only in homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. The first long-term data and one imaging study raise hope that the endpoint trials will show the expected reduction in cardiovascular events. Long-term trials have to show the long-term safety. In Germany it is legally regulated which patients can be treated by PCSK9 inhibitors and these prerequisites are largely in accordance with clinical practice.

CONCLUSION

The body of evidence is rapidly increasing thereby facilitating the decision making when PCSK9 inhibitors could be used. The PCSK9 inhibitors will considerably improve the options for optimal treatment of high-risk patients.

Two Patients with Familial Hypercholesterolemia Who Were Successfully Weaned from Low-density Lipoprotein Apheresis after Treatment with Evolocumab

Two elderly patients (a 76-year-old man and a 75-year-old woman), who had been previously diagnosed with familial hypercholesterolemia (at 58 and 48 years of age, respectively) underwent long-term treatment with oral therapy and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis. As their LDL cholesterol levels remained high (>150 mg/dL and >120 mg/dL, respectively) and their familial hypercholesterolemia was complicated with angina pectoris, we added evolocumab to their prescription. Thereafter, their LDL cholesterol levels decreased rapidly, and the patients were successfully weaned from LDL apheresis. Evolocumab therapy should thus be considered when LDL apheresis cannot achieve the target LDL cholesterol levels, though the prognosis of such treatment remains unclear.

Long-term Low-density Lipoprotein Apheresis in a Patient with Refractory Idiopathic Membranous Glomerulonephritis

A 61-year-old Japanese man developed nephrotic syndrome (NS) due to idiopathic membranous glomerulonephritis (MGN). He received immunosuppressive therapy for two years, including prednisolone, cyclophosphamide, and cyclosporine A, but the NS persisted. Low-density lipoprotein apheresis (LDL-A) was initiated at a frequency of twice a month and continued for 9 years (203 sessions in total). His proteinuria reduced to less than 1 g daily after 9 years. LDL-A was stopped, and the NS has not relapsed for five years. This case suggests that long-term LDL-A therapy may be a treatment option for idiopathic MGN refractory to immunosuppressive therapy or short-term LDL-A.