A randomized comparison of bivalirudin and heparin in patients undergoing coronary angioplasty for postinfarction angina. Hirulog Angioplasty Study Investigators

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in renal insufficiency undergoing dialysis and percutaneous coronary intervention after acute myocardial infarction: A case report

BACKGROUND

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a rare complication of heparin therapy, and is characterized by arteriovenous thrombosis and bleeding events. The incidence of HIT after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with myocardial infarction complicated with renal failure is rarely reported.

CASE SUMMARY

We report a 73-year-old man with acute myocardial infarction and renal failure who underwent hemodialysis and PCI, and developed a progressive decline in platelets and subcutaneous hemorrhage of both upper limbs after heparin treatment. In addition to a gradual decrease in platelets, the patient’s 4T's score was 7, and HIT antibody was positive, confirming the diagnosis of HIT.

CONCLUSION

Patients receiving heparin combined with antiplatelet therapy should be monitored closely, especially for their platelet count. In the case of thrombo-cytopenia, HIT should be highly suspected. When the diagnosis of HIT is confirmed, timely individualized treatment should be delivered.

Bivalirudin versus heparin in percutaneous coronary intervention-a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials stratified by adjunctive glycoprotein IIb/IIIa strategy

Background

Bivalirudin has been shown to be associated with less major bleeding than heparin in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI); but the confounding effect of concomitant glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPI) limits meaningful comparison. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare bivalirudin to heparin, with and without adjunctive GPI in PCI.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Cochrane, EMBASE, CINAHL and WOS from January 2000 to December 2017 for clinical trials comparing bivalirudin to heparin, with and without adjunctive GPI during PCI. Cochrane's Q statistics were used to determine heterogeneity. Random effects model was used.

Results

Twenty-six comparison groups (22 original studies and 4 subgroup analyses) with 53,364 patients were included. Mean follow-up was 192±303 days. There was no difference between the two groups in all-cause mortality [risk ratio (RR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.82-1.05, P=0.260), target vessel revascularization (TVR) (RR: 1.17; 95% CI: 0.93-1.46, P=0.174) or stroke (RR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.71-1.18, P=0.490). Major bleeding was lower in the bivalirudin group with concomitant GPI in one or both arms (RR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.53-0.77, P<0.001) and without (RR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.51-0.99, P=0.041) provisional or routine GPIs. Bivalirudin appeared to have a higher risk of stent thrombosis (RR: 1.32; 95% CI: 1.04-1.68, P=0.022) and a trend towards more myocardial infarction (RR: 1.12; 95% CI: 0.98-1.28, P=0.098) though without statistical significance. However, exclusion of studies with GPI showed no difference in stent thrombosis or myocardial infarction with bivalirudin.

Conclusions

Bivalirudin is associated with less major bleeding compared to heparin, regardless of GPI use. The lower anticoagulant effect of bivalirudin is linked with higher stent thrombosis and a trend towards more MI, however a confounding effect of GPI use in the heparin arm cannot be excluded.

Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia: A Comprehensive Clinical Review

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is a profoundly dangerous, potentially lethal, immunologically mediated adverse drug reaction to unfractionated heparin or, less commonly, to low-molecular weight heparin. In this comprehensive review, the authors highlight heparin-induced thrombocytopenia's risk factors, clinical presentation, pathophysiology, diagnostic principles, and treatment. The authors place special emphasis on the management of patients requiring procedures using cardiopulmonary bypass or interventions in the catheterization laboratory. Clinical vigilance of this disease process is important to ensure its recognition, diagnosis, and treatment. Misdiagnosis of the syndrome, as well as misunderstanding of the disease process, continues to contribute to its morbidity and mortality.

Bivalirudin: Pharmacology and Clinical Applications

Bivalirudin (Hirulog, Angiomax) is a specific, reversible and direct thrombin inhibitor with a predictable anticoagulant effect. It is cleared by both proteolytic cleavage and renal mechanisms, predominantly glomerular filtration. Bivalirudin inhibits both circulating thrombin and fibrin bound thrombin directly by binding to thrombin catalytic site and anion-binding exosite I in a concentration-dependent manner. Bivalirudin prolongs activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin time, thrombin time and activated clotting time (ACT). ACT levels with bivalirudin do not correlate with its clinical efficacy. Bivalirudin with a provisional GpIIb/IIIa inhibitor is indicated in elective contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In respect to combined ischemic and hemorrhagic endpoints of death, myocardial infarction, unplanned urgent revascularization and major bleeding during PCI (including subgroups of patients with renal impairment and diabetes) bivalirudin is not inferior to unfractioned heparin and planned GpIIb/IIIa inhibitors. In addition, bivalirudin has been consistently shown to have significantly less in-hospital major bleeding than heparin alone or heparin in combination with a GpIIb/IIIa inhibitor. Bivalirudin appears to be also safe and effective during PCI in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Finally, data from PCI studies support the safety and efficacy of bivalirudin, although its direct randomized comparison with unfractionated heparin is lacking.

Treatment of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia: Is There a Role for Bivalirudin?

The recognition and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with thrombosis syndrome (HITTS) has been evolving over the past several years. Although HIT is a relatively uncommon adverse event in patients receiving heparin therapy, it bears a significant risk of thrombotic events. If patients are left untreated, 50% can develop thrombosis. Several direct thrombin inhibitors have been studied as alternative anticoagulants in patients with HIT. Lepirudin and argatroban are both approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the management of HIT. Lepirudin requires dosage adjustments in patients with renal insufficiency and has potential for antibody formation. Argatroban requires dosage adjustments in patients with hepatic insufficiency. Argatroban increases the international normalized ratio when coadministered with warfarin, leading to dosage difficulties when transitioning to warfarin therapy. Bivalirudin is the most recent direct thrombin inhibitor to be introduced to the market, but it is not currently FDA approved for HIT. Controversy still exists over which direct thrombin inhibitor to use, especially in acutely ill patients and in those requiring invasive or surgical procedures. Bivalirudin has a relatively short half-life and a predictable response, which makes it attractive as an anticoagulant in patients requiring invasive or surgical procedures, those who are acutely ill, or patients with both renal and hepatic insufficiency. It offers promise as an additional direct thrombin inhibitor for use in patients with HIT, but additional studies need to be performed to further define its use.

Brachytherapy and bivalirudin evaluation study

BACKGROUND

Bivalirudin is shown to be a competent substitute for heparin in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The safety and efficacy of bivalirudin in patients undergoing PCI and vascular brachytherapy (VBT) are not known. This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of bivalirudin as a single antithrombotic agent in patients undergoing PCI and VBT.

METHODS

A total of 152 patients enrolled in the Brachytherapy and Bivalirudin Evaluation Study underwent PCI and VBT with either gamma (n = 8) or beta radiation (n = 144). The main outcome measures were in-hospital events and 30-day clinical outcomes. All patients were treated with bivalirudin (0.75 mg/kg bolus and 1.75 mg/kg per hour infusion for beta radiation, 1 mg/kg bolus and 2.5 mg/kg per hour infusion for gamma radiation) as a single antithrombotic agent during the entire procedure.

RESULTS

Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. More than 90% of the patients received beta radiation. In-hospital events showed a higher prevalence of acute procedural intracoronary thrombosis in patients treated with gamma- vs beta radiation (25% vs. 0.7%, P < .001). Thirty-day outcomes including death, Q-wave, and non-Q-wave myocardial infarctions, subacute stent thromboses, and repeat revascularizations were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Bivalirudin, as a single antithrombotic agent during PCI and VBT with beta emitters, may be used safely, but its use in the setting of PCI and gamma radiation may not be acceptable due to an increased incidence of acute procedural intracoronary thrombosis.

Treatment of acute coronary syndromes in patients who have chronic kidney disease

Patients with CKD and CAD have traditionally been a difficult population to diagnose and treat in the setting of ACS. In addition to having poorer outcomes post-ACS, data are lacking regarding best treatments available. Aggressive interventional and medical treatments in this group with already poor outcomes are not necessarily contraindicated and should always be considered. The appalling outcome for CKD patients post-ACS is improved by many therapies shown to benefit in the non-CKD patients. Data suggest that troponins are useful markers in CKD patients, that major bleeding is not increased with the use of GP IIb-IIIa antagonists, that thrombolytics have been used successfully in CKD patients, and that PCI electively and as a primary treatment for ACS is successful and probably more beneficial to treatment.

Antithrombotic agents in the treatment of severe sepsis

Sepsis, a systemic inflammatory syndrome, is a response to infection and when associated with multiple organ dysfunction is termed severe sepsis. It remains a leading cause of mortality in the critically ill. The response to the invading microorganisms may be considered as a balance between a pro-inflammatory and an anti-inflammatory reaction. While an inadequate pro-inflammatory reaction and a strong anti-inflammatory response could lead to overwhelming infection and the death of the patient, a strong and uncontrolled pro-inflammatory response, manifested by the release of pro-inflammatory mediators may lead to microvascular thrombosis and multiple organ failure. Endotoxin triggers sepsis via the release of various mediators such as tumour necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-1 (IL-1). These cytokines activate the complement and coagulation systems, release adhesion molecules, prostaglandins, leukotrienes, reactive oxygen species and nitric oxide. Other mediators involved in the sepsis syndrome include IL-1, -6 and -8; arachidonic acid metabolites; platelet activating factor; histamine; bradykinin; angiotensin; complement components and vasoactive intestinal peptide. These pro-inflammatory responses are counteracted by IL-10. Most of the trials targeting the different mediators of the pro-inflammatory response have failed due to a lack of correct definition of sepsis. Understanding the exact pathophysiology of the disease will enable more advanced treatment options. Targeting the coagulation system with various anticoagulant agents including, activated protein C, and tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) is a rational approach. Many clinical trials have been conducted to evaluate these agents in severe sepsis. While trials on antithrombin and TFPI were not so successful, the double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase III trial of recombinant human activated Protein C Worldwide Evaluation in Severe Sepsis (PROWESS) was successful, creating a significant decrease in mortality when compared to the placebo group. A better understanding of the pathophysiologic mechanism of severe sepsis will provide better treatment options, and combination antithrombotic treatment may provide a multipronged approach for the treatment of severe sepsis.

The Direct Thrombin Inhibitors: Their Role and Use for Rational Anticoagulation

Major clinical advantages are achieved when direct thrombin inhibitors are used in venous thromboembolism. These agents provide more reliable anticoagulant response patterns because they are not significantly bound to plasma proteins and few, if any, drug-drug interactions are seen. The studies to date confirm that not all direct thrombin inhibitors are the same. The new reversible, short-acting catalytic site-specific drugs provide an excellent safety profile and high degree of efficacy for the prophylaxis and treatment of venous thromboembolism and pulmonary embolic states. The availability of the oral prodrug ximelagatran allows reproducible, effective, and safe direct thrombin inhibition without the requirement for coagulation laboratory monitoring; it appears destined to be the oral anticoagulant of the future.

Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage strategY (ACUITY) trial: study design and rationale

BACKGROUND

Patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS; unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction) are at significant risk for death and myocardial infarction. Early angiography followed by revascularization is considered the treatment of choice for moderate- to high-risk patients with ACS. However, despite the integration of newer therapies including stents, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, and thienopyridines, the rate of adverse ischemic events still remains unacceptably high, and the intensive pharmacologic regimens used to stabilize the disrupted atherosclerotic plaque and support angioplasty and surgical revascularization procedures elicit a high rate of bleeding complications. Pilot trials suggest that the thrombin-specific anticoagulant bivalirudin may improve clinical outcomes in ACS.

STUDY DESIGN

In the Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage strategY (ACUITY) trial, 13,800 patients with moderate- to high-risk ACS are being prospectively randomly assigned at up to 600 centers to unfractionated heparin or enoxaparin + IIb/IIIa inhibition, versus bivalirudin + IIb/IIIa inhibition, versus bivalirudin + provisional IIb/IIIa inhibition. All patients undergo cardiac catheterization within 72 hours, followed by percutaneous or surgical revascularization when appropriate. In a second random assignment, patients assigned to receive IIb/IIIa inhibitors are subrandomized to upstream drug initiation, versus IIb/IIIa inhibitor administration during angioplasty only. The primary study end point is the composite of death, myocardial infarction, unplanned revascularization for ischemia, and major bleeding at 30 days. Clinical follow-up will continue for 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

The ACUITY trial is the largest study yet performed in patients with ACS undergoing an invasive strategy. In addition to evaluating the utility of bivalirudin in ACS, this study will also provide important guidance regarding the necessity for and timing of IIb/IIIa inhibitor administration.

Hirulog-like peptide reduces restenosis and expression of tissue factor and transforming growth factor-beta in carotid artery of atherosclerotic rabbits

Restenosis is responsible to approximately 30% of long-term failure following therapeutic vascular procedures. Thrombosis plays a key role in the development of restenosis. Thrombin-specific inhibitors have been considered as one type of candidates for the prevention of restenosis. Previous studies by our group demonstrated that a novel thrombin-specific inhibitor, hirulog-like peptide (HLP), reduced balloon catheter-induced neointima formation in rat carotid arteries. The present study examined the effect of HLP on angioplasty-induced restenosis in carotid arteries of atherosclerotic rabbits. New Zealand white rabbits were subject to air desiccation of the lumen of the right carotid arteries, then received high cholesterol/fat diet for 3 weeks. The rabbits were intravenously infused with HLP (1.6 mg/(kg/h)) or saline (n=7 per group) for 4 h started before angioplasty which dilated atherosclerotic lesions in right common carotid artery. Four weeks after the angioplasty, neointimal area, stenosis and neointima/media ratio in injured carotid arteries were reduced in atherosclerotic rabbits treated with HLP compared to saline controls by 62, 39 and 59% (P<0.05). The expression of tissue factor (TF) and transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta in the neointima of carotid arteries of rabbits treated with HLP was significantly weaker than saline controls (P<0.05 or <0.01). Activated partial thromboplastin time and bleeding time in HLP-treated rabbits were not significantly prolonged compared to controls. The results of the present study suggest that HLP may substantially reduce angioplasty-induced restenosis in atherosclerotic rabbits without increasing bleeding tendency. The inhibition on the expression of TF and TGF-beta in the neointima of the arterial wall may contribute to the preventive effect of HLP on restenosis in atherosclerotic rabbits.

Combination platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor and lepirudin administration during percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

We evaluated a combination therapy using glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonism and direct thrombin inhibition in nine patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) undergoing 10 percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs). In selected patients with HIT, the combination of a direct thrombin inhibitor, lepirudin, and abciximab, tirofiban, or eptifibatide appears to be a safe and effective anticoagulation strategy for PCI.

Management of patients with acute coronary syndromes: what is the clinical role of direct thrombin inhibitors?

Despite important pharmacokinetic and biological advantages of direct thrombin inhibitors over heparin, early randomised trials failed to demonstrate a clear net clinical benefit of these agents compared with heparin because of a higher bleeding risk, particularly with hirudin, and only modest efficacy gains. More recently, however, a systematic review of the direct thrombin inhibitor trials based on individual patient data as well as the results of the 17 000-patient Hirulog Early Reperfusion or Occlusion (HERO)-2 trial have confirmed the superiority of both hirudin and bivalirudin over unfractionated heparin in patients with acute coronary syndromes and undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Ongoing trials should further clarify the role of bivalirudin in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the context of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor use, while additional studies are required to define the role of direct thrombin inhibitors used in conjunction with other newer antithrombotic and/or thrombolytic strategies in patients with acute coronary syndromes.

Bivalirudin: a direct thrombin inhibitor for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty

The treatment of patients with acute coronary syndromes has changed dramatically over the last several years. Most patients now undergo some form of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), which includes either stent placement or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). Along with new medical interventions for acute coronary syndromes comes the need for new antithrombotic therapies. Combination therapy with antiplatelet agents (aspirin, adenosine diphosphate inhibitors), glycoprotein (GP) IIb-IIIa receptor inhibitors, and anticoagulants (unfractionated heparin or low-molecular-weight heparins) is administered, depending on the type of intervention and severity of the coronary lesion. Bivalirudin is a direct thrombin inhibitor that recently was approved as an alternative to heparin in patients undergoing PTCA. Compared with unfractionated heparin, bivalirudin reduces the rate of death, myocardial infarction, or revascularization, with a concurrent reduction in bleeding. This agent offers promise as a replacement for unfractionated heparin in PCI and is being studied in comparison with unfractionated heparin plus GP IIb-IIIa receptor inhibitors in patients undergoing intracoronary stent placement.

Bivalirudin: a review of its potential place in the management of acute coronary syndromes

Bivalirudin, a synthetic analogue of hirudin, is a specific and reversible inhibitor of thrombin which binds directly with both fluid-phase and clot-bound thrombin. In patients with unstable angina undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), results from a large well designed study and its reanalysis (n = 4312) indicate that bivalirudin is more effective than heparin in the prevention of ischaemic complications for up to 90 days after the start of treatment. In addition, among patients undergoing PTCA for post myocardial infarction (MI) bivalirudin may be more effective than heparin in preventing ischaemic complications for up to 180 days after treatment was started. Data from dose-finding studies indicate bivalirudin has potential in the treatment of patients with unstable angina not undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI); however, well designed comparative studies are needed before firm conclusions can be made. Among patients with acute ST elevation MI, randomised trials have demonstrated bivalirudin to be significantly more effective than heparin in improving early patency in patients receiving thrombolytic therapy with streptokinase. Data from the Hirulog and Early Reperfusion/Occlusion (HERO)-1 trial (n = 412) indicate that bivalirudin recipients were significantly more likely to have Thrombin Inhibition in Myocardial Ischaemia (TIMI) grade 3 flow at 90 to 120 minutes than heparin recipients. In addition, data from the HERO-2 trial (n = 17 073) show bivalirudin was significantly more effective than heparin in reducing adjudicated 96-hour reinfarction and 30-day investigator-reported death/reinfarction than heparin. Bivalirudin was as effective as heparin in reducing 30-day mortality. Data from a meta-analysis of four randomised trials among patients undergoing PTCA or treatment for acute coronary syndromes indicate that, at after 30 to 50 days of follow-up, bivalirudin was significantly more effective than heparin in reducing the incidence of nonfatal MI and the combined endpoint of death or nonfatal MI. The most significant adverse events associated with bivalirudin are bleeding complications. In individual trials, bivalirudin was as well tolerated as heparin with, in general, a reduced incidence of bleeding complications. Additionally, bivalirudin provides a more consistent, predictable anticoagulant response. In 4312 patients with unstable angina undergoing PTCA the incidence of retroperitoneal bleeding, blood transfusion and major haemorrhage was significantly lower in bivalirudin than heparin recipients. Data from the HERO-2 trial in patients with acute MI indicate that although bivalirudin recipients had a significantly higher incidence of mild or moderate bleeding than heparin recipients, there was no difference in intracranial haemorrhage, severe bleeding or transfusions. Data from a meta-analysis among 5674 patients with ischaemic heart disease show bivalirudin recipients were at a significantly lower risk of haemorrhagic events than heparin recipients.

CONCLUSIONS

Bivalirudin is an effective alternative to heparin in the prevention of ischaemic complications in patients with unstable angina undergoing PTCA. In addition, the drug has shown potential in the treatment of patients with unstable angina not undergoing PCI. For patients with MI, it is clear that bivalirudin can replace heparin in the management of MI where streptokinase is used as the thrombolytic agent. Further data are required on the efficacy of bivalirudin in patients undergoing thrombolysis with newer thrombolytics.

Bivalirudin administration during percutaneous coronary intervention: emphasis on high-risk patients

In a large phase III study of patients with unstable angina treated with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), the thrombin-specific anticoagulant bivalirudin produced relative risk reductions of 22% (p = 0.039) for ischemic complications and 62% (p < 0.001) for bleeding complications compared with heparin. Subsequent reports have shown that between-treatment differences favoring fewer complications with bivalirudin also extend to high-risk patients. Early heparinization promotes heparin resistance and decreases activated clotting time achieved during PTCA. These effects are relevant to patients with postinfarction angina, which is associated with a greater likelihood of early vessel closure and procedural failure. In 1006 patients with one or both of these risk factors, bivalirudin significantly reduced combined ischemic and bleeding complications compared with heparin (8.6% vs 18%, p < 0.001). Treatment separations favoring bivalirudin increased with risk, suggesting decreased heparin effectiveness in patients at heightened risk. Findings in three additional risk groups-women, the elderly, and patients not receiving glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors-also showed fewer complications with bivalirudin therapy. Preliminary data suggest that bivalirudin can be combined safely with glycoprotein IIb/Illa antagonists in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), including PTCA. An ongoing trial is aimed at determining the efficacy and safety of heparin with planned glycoprotein IIb/IIIa therapy versus bivalirudin with provisional glycoprotein IIb/IIIa therapy. The use of bivalirudin in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia also is being evaluated after favorable findings in early compassionate-use studies. The fact that between-treatment differences favoring bivalirudin were especially outstanding among the high-risk patients considered in this review reinforces the impression that bivalirudin is a promising and unprecedented alternative to heparin in PCI.

Percutaneous coronary intervention with bivalirudin anticoagulation, immediate sheath removal, and early ambulation: a feasibility study with implications for day-stay procedures

We assessed the feasibility and safety of a strategy of transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with bivalirudin anticoagulation, immediate sheath removal, early ambulation, and, where possible, same-day discharge in 100 consecutive patients. Ambulation was achieved by 2 hr 30 min in 85% of patients and same-day discharge in 26%. PCI was angiographically successful in 97%. In hospital, there were no deaths or Q-wave myocardial infarctions. One patient suffered a non-Q-wave infarction, another in-hospital surgical revascularization and one required blood transfusion for rectal bleeding. Femoral access site hematoma > 5 cm diameter occurred in two patients. In addition, by 1 month there had been one death (at 10 days) and one pseudoaneurysm treated nonsurgically. In this preliminary study, the strategy of bivalirudin bolus anticoagulation, immediate sheath removal, and 2-hr ambulation after PCI appeared safe, with same-day discharge possible in 26% of unselected patients with stable or unstable angina.

Treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

OBJECTIVE

To describe heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT or HIT-2), an immune-mediated adverse reaction to heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin. Available treatment options and considerations in developing a therapy approach are discussed.

DATA SOURCES

A search of the National Library of Medicine (1992-June 2001) was done to identify pertinent literature. Additional references were reviewed from selected articles.

STUDY SELECTION

Articles related to laboratory recognition and treatment options of HIT, including the use of agents in selected clinical conditions, were reviewed and included.

CONCLUSIONS

HIT is a rare but potentially severe adverse reaction to heparin that was, until recently, poorly understood and had limited treatment options. Recent advances describing the recognition and clinical manifestations of immune-mediated HIT, including recently available antithrombotic treatment options, have dramatically changed outcomes for patients having this syndrome.

Bivalirudin: a direct thrombin inhibitor

BACKGROUND

Studies of the anticoagulant effects of hirudin, which is derived from the saliva of the leech Hirudo medicinalis, led to the development of compounds that can directly inhibit thrombin activity without the need for additional cofactors. One of these is the direct thrombin inhibitor bivalirudin, which has recently been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for use as an anticoagulant in patients with unstable angina undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.

OBJECTIVE

This is a review of the pharmacologic properties, efficacy, tolerability, and potential cost-effectiveness of bivalirudin in the treatment of ischemic coronary syndromes.

METHODS

Articles were identified by searches of MEDLINE (1966-September 2001), International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970-September 2001), and the Iowa Drug Information Service (1966-September 2001) using the terms bivalirudin and Hirulog. The reference lists of retrieved articles were also reviewed for relevant articles.

RESULTS

Bivalirudin is a synthetic polypeptide that directly inhibits thrombin by binding simultaneously to its active catalytic site and its substrate recognition site. After intravenous administration, peak plasma concentrations occur in 2 minutes. In patients given a 1.0-mg/kg bolus followed by a 2.5-mg/kg per hour infusion, a median activated clotting time of 346 seconds is achieved with little interpatient or intrapatient variability. Clearance of bivalirudin occurs through a combination of renal elimination and proteolytic cleavage, and doses may need to be decreased in the presence of renal dysfunction. In patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions, bivalirudin has been associated with equivalent efficacy but lower bleeding rates (P < 0.001) than unfractionated heparin (UFH). Data from the Hirulog Early Reperfusion/Occlusion-2 study suggest no reduction in mortality with bivalirudin compared with heparin when either is added to aspirin and streptokinase in patients with acute myocardial infarction, despite a lower reinfarction rate (P < 0.001). Experience with bivalirudin in patients with unstable angina and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), as well as in patients receiving glycoprotein IIb/IIIla inhibitors, is limited. The differences in bleeding rates between bivalirudin and heparin in published clinical trials probably reflect differences in levels of anticoagulation achieved in comparator groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Given its high cost, bivalirudin should be reserved for use as an alternative to UFH, primarily in patients with HIT, until clinical trials have more clearly demonstrated its benefits in terms of efficacy or safety.

Pitfalls in the Use of Anticoagulants

Anticoagulants are in widespread use for the management of a variety of conditions, ranging from thrombus prevention to the treatment of arterial and venous occlusion. As with any effective therapy, recognition of adverse effects is critically important for the safe use of these drugs. Pitfalls in the use of heparins include dosing in close proximity to invasive procedures; not closely monitoring patients in whom dose adjustments may be required, such as the very obese, the elderly, and patients with renal or hepatic failure; failing to make dose adjustments during pregnancy; and not recognizing when patients are developing heparin-induced thrombocytopenia or osteoporosis. Pitfalls in the use of unfractionated heparin include delays in achieving a therapeutic activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and failure to consider the effects of protein binding in acutely ill patients. A pitfall in the use of low molecular weight heparin is giving prophylactic doses when therapeutic doses are indicated. Pitfalls in the use of warfarin are stopping heparin before the warfarin is fully effective; failing to maintain the International Normalized Ratio within the therapeutic range; failing to adjust the dose of warfarin because of changes in diet, renal or hepatic failure, and exposure to new drugs; failing to stop warfarin at an appropriate interval before an invasive procedure; and giving warfarin during pregnancy. Pitfalls in the use of thrombin inhibitors include using them with thrombolytic agents; giving them in proximity to invasive procedures; not adjusting the dose for renal or hepatic failure; and failing to consider the effect of these agents on the prothrombin time when initiating warfarin therapy.

Bivalirudin for percutaneous coronary intervention and in acute coronary syndromes

This review focuses on the use of bivalirudin as a replacement anticoagulant for heparin in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, or who are being treated for unstable angina pectoris, ST-elevation, or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Potential advantages of bivalirudin include a lack of dependence on antithrombin III for anticoagulant activity, the ability to inactivate both fibrin-bound and soluble thrombin, a lack of aggregatory effects on platelets, a predictable anticoagulant response without monitoring, and a wider therapeutic window. Clinical trial results to date suggest that bivlirudin is at least as effective as heparin with superior safety due to lower bleeding rates.

New anticoagulant drugs

Arterial and venous thrombosis are major causes of morbidity and mortality. Arterial thrombosis is the most common cause of myocardial infarction, stroke, and limb gangrene. Venous thrombosis leads to potentially fatal pulmonary embolism and to post-phlebitic syndrome. Because arterial thrombi consist of platelet aggregates held together by small amounts of fibrin, strategies to inhibit arterial thrombogenesis focus mainly on blocking platelet function, but often include anticoagulants to prevent fibrin deposition. Anticoagulants are used for the prevention and treatment of venous thrombosis because venous thrombi consist mainly of fibrin and red blood cells. This paper (1) reviews arterial and venous thrombogenesis, (2) outlines new anticoagulant strategies, and (3) provides clinical perspectives on these new strategies.

Clinical use of new antithrombotic therapies for medical management of acute coronary syndromes

Prevention and management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are focal points of interest among health care providers. Acute coronary syndromes is an all-encompassing term that refers to unstable angina, non-Q wave myocardial infarction, and Q wave myocardial infarction. These syndromes are usually the result of atherosclerotic plaque rupture leading to thrombus formation in a coronary artery. Heparin and aspirin are traditional antithrombotic treatments. They typically are administered with antiischemic therapies and often with fibrinolytic agents for patients with ST segment elevation associated with acute myocardial infarction. Although aspirin and heparin are important, they have significant limitations that have prompted development of newer antithrombotic approaches. Adenosine diphosphate inhibitors have been evaluated as either alternatives or adjunctive treatment to aspirin. Glycoprotein IIb-IIIa receptor inhibitors, low-molecular-weight heparins, and direct thrombin inhibitors have been studied as concurrent therapy with, or as alternatives to, heparin.

Thrombin inhibitors as anticoagulant agents

Hirudin and its analogues and the synthetic antithrombin agents are interesting new antithrombotic agents that have been studied in a number of well-designed randomized clinical trials and further studies are underway. These agents offer certain advantages over heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin, and at least one agent is orally bioavailable. Studies have shown that the specific thrombin inhibitors can significantly decrease the incidence of composite cardiac endpoints in acute ischemic syndromes (following thrombolysis for myocardial infarction, unstable angina, and non-Q wave myocardial infarction and coronary angioplasty), but it is disappointing that the benefits obtained during short-term treatment are not sustained in the long term. Recent data are reviewed here from clinical trials supporting the use of the specific antithrombin agents in the treatment of acute cardiac ischemic syndromes, the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism, and the management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.