Prospects for changing the burden of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug toxicity

Gastroprotective Effect of 2,3-Dimethylquinoxaline Against Indomethacin-Induced Gastric Ulcer in Rat

Background

Gastric ulcers pose a significant health risk due to an imbalance between protective and aggressive factors on the mucous membrane. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-induced gastric damage affects 25% of users. Quinoxaline compounds, known for their diverse biological properties, have potential applications in cancer therapy and as antimicrobial agents targeting various pathogens.

Objective

Our study aimed to investigate the impact of DMQ on gastroprotective mechanisms in an experimental model of indomethacin-induced gastric ulcer.

Methods

Thirty male Wistar rats were randomly assigned to five groups. Group 1 served as the control, while Group 2 received a single oral dose of IND (30 mg/kg). Groups 3 and 4 received oral DMQ (30 mg/kg and 60 mg/kg, respectively) for three days, with the final dose administered intragastrically one hour before IND administration. Group 5 received esomeprazole (30 mg/kg) orally for three days, with the final dose given one hour before IND administration. Rats were sacrificed four hours after IND induction.

Results

Indomethacin-induced ulcers were associated with epithelial damage and blood streaks on the gastric mucosa. However, DMQ significantly decreased levels of inflammatory biomarkers (TNF-α, IL-6, Cox-2, IFN-γ, and IL-β1) while increasing gastroprotective mediator prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and mucin levels. Histopathological analysis revealed a significant reduction in ulcer-induced pathological alterations and upregulation of tumor suppressor genes (NF-κB levels) following DMQ treatment. Rats treated with Indo+DMQ showed a significant decrease in ulcer index compared to the Indo group, with mild injuries observed.

Conclusion

DMQ demonstrated promising gastroprotective effects against IND-induced gastric ulcers, as evidenced by alterations in histopathological data and upregulation of gene expression.

Indomethacin co-amorphous drug-drug systems with improved solubility, supersaturation, dissolution rate and physical stability

In this study, new co-amorphous drug systems were designed using a pharmacologically relevant combination to improve the solubility and dissolution of indomethacin. Combinations of indomethacin-paracetamol (IND-PAR) as an anti-inflammatory/pain killer, and indomethacin-nicotinamide (IND-NCT) for prevention of gastric ulcers caused by IND, were developed for co-amorphization. The effect of PAR and NCT on the solubility, supersaturation, and dissolution of the poorly soluble counterpart, IND, was investigated. PAR and NCT were found to enhance the solubility and supersaturation of IND in biorelevant medium (FaSSIF) and in FaSSIF blank. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) showed capability of IND-PAR and IND-NCT binary mixtures to form eutectic mixture. Powder X-ray diffraction and DSC indicated the formation of a homogenous co-amorphous system with single T_g value. Hydrogen bonding between IND and each of PAR and NCT were found to stabilize the co-amorphous systems as supported by FTIR studies. The intrinsic dissolution rate under sink conditions was improved over that of plain amorphous IND both in FaSSIF and FaSSIF blank. IND-PAR 2:1 and IND-NCT 1:1 were extremely stable and remained amorphous for 7 months at 25 °C, while all co-amorphous formulations were stable at least up to one month at 40 °C under dry condition. The present work demonstrates an improved approach to combine IND-PAR and IND-NCT as promising co-amorphous systems for potential therapeutical applications.

Indomethacin-induced gastric ulceration in rats: Ameliorative roles of Spondias mombin and Ficus exasperata

CONTEXT

Spondias mombin Linn (Anacardiaceae) and Ficus exasperata Valh (Moraceae) are botanicals with known phytotherapeutic potentials in the traditional system of medicine in the world.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to investigate the quantitative polyphenolic constituents and gastroprotective effects of aqueous leaf extracts of Spondias mombin and Ficus exasperata against indomethacin-induced gastric ulcer in rats.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ulceration was induced by a single oral administration of indomethacin (30 mg/kg body weight (b.w.)). Ulcerated rats were orally administered with esomeprazole (a reference drug) at a dose of 20 mg/kg body weight, and Spondias mombin and Ficus exasperata at a dose of 100 and 200 mg/kg b.w. once daily for 21 d after ulcer induction. Gastric secretions and antioxidant parameters were thereafter evaluated.

RESULTS

The significantly increased (p < 0.05) ulcer index, gastric volume, malondialdehyde level, and pepsin activity by indomethacin were effectively reduced by 65.40, 36.47, 45.71, and 53.79%, respectively, following treatment with F. exasperata at 200 mg/kg b.w. S. mombin at this regimen also attenuated these parameters by 71.70, 46.62, 50.16, and 55.73%. Moreover, the extracts significantly increase the reduced activity of superoxide dismutase as well as pH and mucin content in the ulcerated rats.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

These findings are indicative of gastroprotective and antioxidative potentials of the extracts which is also evident in the degree of % inhibition against ulceration. The available data in this study suggest that the extracts proved to be capable of ameliorating indomethacin-induced gastric ulceration and the probable mechanisms are via antioxidative and proton pump inhibition.

Indomethacin-induced gastric ulceration in rats: Protective roles of Spondias mombin and Ficus exasperata

This study investigated the quantitative polyphenolic constituents and gastroprotective effects of aqueous leaf extracts of Spondias mombin and Ficus exasperata against indomethacin-induced gastric ulcer in rats. Ulceration was induced by a single oral administration of indomethacin (30 mg/kg body weight). Wistar rats were pretreated with esomeprazole (reference drug) at a dose of 20 mg/kg body weight, S. mombin or F. exasperata at 100 and 200 mg/kg body weight once daily for 21 days prior to ulcer induction. At the end of the experiment, gastric secretions and antioxidant parameters were evaluated. We observed that the significantly increased (p < 0.05) ulcer index, gastric volume, malondialdehyde level and pepsin activity were effectively reduced following treatment with S. mombin and F. exasperata. The extracts also markedly attenuated the reduced activity of superoxide dismutase as well as pH and mucin content in the ulcerated rats. These findings are indicative of gastroprotective and antioxidative potentials of the extracts which is also evident in the degree of % inhibition against ulceration. The available data in this study suggest that the extracts of S. mombin and F. exasperata proved to be capable of ameliorating indomethacin-induced gastric ulceration and the probable mechanisms are via antioxidative and proton pump inhibition.

Costa I, Pio Santos AC, Szszudlowski RG, de Oliveira Silva D. Interaction of chitosan beads with a copper–naproxen metallodrug

A new hybrid material resulting from the interaction of chitosan beads with a copper–naproxen metallodrug was prepared and characterized. The Acrycoat-coated beads were investigated for release behavior in gastric/intestinal pH simulated solutions.

Tolerability of selective cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors used for the treatment of rheumatological manifestations of inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are used to reduce inflammatory pain and swelling in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients with rheumatological manifestations. While these drugs effectively reduce musculoskeletal pain and stiffness, long-term use is limited by gastrointestinal (GI) adverse effects (AEs) and disease exacerbation. As an alternative to NSAIDs, selective cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) inhibitors were developed to improve GI safety and tolerability. COX-2 inhibitors include drugs such as celecoxib, rofecoxib, valdecoxib, etoricoxib, and lumiracoxib. Rofecoxib and valdecoxib have been withdrawn from the market worldwide due to safety concerns (most importantly for cardiovascular adverse events) and lumiracoxib has been withdrawn in many countries due to liver toxicity. However, celecoxib and etoricoxib continue to be available for use in many countries. Several studies have examined whether COX-2 inhibitors can be safely used for the treatment of rheumatological manifestations of IBD with inconsistent results. Some investigators report acceptable safety profiles associated with these drugs while others found that COX-2 inhibitors are associated with high rates of disease exacerbation.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the tolerability and safety of COX-2 inhibitors used for the treatment of rheumatological manifestations of IBD.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following databases from inception to 19 September 2013: PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE and CENTRAL. The search was not limited by language. Additional trials were identified by manually searching the reference lists of relevant papers and conference proceedings and through correspondence with experts and pharmaceutical companies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared COX-2 inhibitors to placebo were considered for inclusion. Participants were adult patients with IBD presenting with rheumatological manifestations of at least two weeks duration.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed trial eligibility and extracted data. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of patients with disease exacerbation as defined by the included studies. Secondary outcomes included GI adverse effects, renal toxicity, cardiovascular and thrombotic events. Data were analysed on an intention-to-treat basis where patients with missing final outcomes were assumed to have had an exacerbation of IBD. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for dichotomous outcomes. The overall quality of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE criteria.

MAIN RESULTS

There were no RCTs that assessed the tolerability or safety of the withdrawn COX-2 inhibitors rofecoxib, valdecoxib, or lumiracoxib. Two RCTs (n = 381 IBD patients with rheumatological manifestations) were included in the review. One study (n = 159) compared etoricoxib (60 to 120 mg/day) to placebo in IBD patients with quiescent or active ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease. The other study (n = 222) compared celecoxib (200 mg twice daily) to placebo in patients with quiescent ulcerative colitis. Both studies were judged to be at low risk of bias. The two included studies were not pooled for meta-analysis due to differences in patient populations and treatment duration. There was no statistically significant difference in exacerbation of IBD between etoricoxib and placebo. After 12 weeks of treatment the IBD exacerbation rate was 17% (14/82) in the etoricoxib group compared to 19% (15/77) in the placebo group (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.69). A GRADE analysis indicated that the overall quality of the evidence supporting this outcome was low due to very sparse data (29 events). There was no statistically significant difference in exacerbation of ulcerative colitis between celecoxib and placebo. After two weeks of treatment 4% (5/112) of celecoxib patients experienced an exacerbation of ulcerative colitis compared to 6% (7/110) of patients in the placebo group (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.23 to 2.14). A GRADE analysis indicated that the overall quality of the evidence supporting this outcome was low due to very sparse data (12 events). The study comparing etoricoxib to placebo documented but did not report on AEs. The proportion of patients who experienced AEs was similar in the celecoxib and placebo groups (21% and 17%, respectively, P > 0.20). No patients in either group died or experienced serious adverse events. Eleven percent of patients in the celecoxib and placebo groups experienced GI AEs (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.46 to 2.07). A GRADE analysis indicated that the overall quality of the evidence supporting this outcome was low due to very sparse data (24 events). GI AEs led to premature withdrawal from the study in 3% of patients in celecoxib and placebo groups respectively. GI AEs included increased stool frequency, rectal bleeding, and inflamed mucosa. No patients experienced any cardiovascular adverse events. Renal toxicity or thrombotic AEs were not reported.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The results for disease exacerbation and AEs between the COX-2 inhibitors celecoxib and etoricoxib and placebo were uncertain. Thus no definitive conclusions regarding the tolerability and safety of the short term use of celecoxib and etoricoxib in patients with IBD can be drawn. The two included studies suggest that celecoxib and etoricoxib do not exacerbate IBD symptoms. However, it should be noted that both studies had relatively small sample sizes and short follow-up durations. Clinicians need to continue to weigh the risks and benefits of these drugs when treating patients IBD patients with rheumatological manifestations in order to avoid disease exacerbation and other adverse effects. Further RCTs are needed to determine the tolerability and safety of celecoxib and etoricoxib in these patients.

Gastroprotective activity of violacein isolated from Chromobacterium violaceum on indomethacin-induced gastric lesions in rats: investigation of potential mechanisms of action

Chromobacterium violaceum, Gram-negative bacteria species found in tropical regions of the world, produces a distinct deep violet-colored pigment called violacein. In the present study, we investigated whether violacein can promote a gastroprotective effect and verified the possible mechanisms involved in this action. For this study, an indomethacin-induced gastric ulcer rat model was used. The roles of biomolecules such as MPO, PGE₂, pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines, growth factors, caspase-3, NO, K⁺ATP channels, and α₂-receptors were investigated. Violacein exhibited significant gastroprotective effect against indomethacin-induced lesions, while pretreatment with L-NAME and glibenclamide (but not with NEM or yohimbine) was able to reverse this action. Pretreatment with violacein also restored cNOS level to normal and led to attenuation of enhanced apoptosis and gastric microvascular permeability. Our results suggest that violacein provides a significant gastroprotective effect in an indomethacin-induced ulcer model through the maintenance of some vital protein molecules, and this effect appears to be mediated, at least in part, by endogenous prostaglandins, NOS, K⁺ATP channel opening, and inhibition of apoptosis and gastric microvascular permeability.

Role of selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors in exacerbation of inflammatory bowel disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

In the general population, selective cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors have been associated with fewer gastrointestinal adverse effects (AEs) than NSAIDs, but whether they are associated with exacerbations in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remains controversial.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to review published and unpublished findings to determine whether the use of COX-2 inhibitors increased the risk for IBD exacerbations relative to placebo in the treatment of IBD.

METHODS

A systematic search of MEDLINE (1966-July 2007), EMBASE (1980-July 2007), the Cochrane Library (2007 Issue 4), US Food and Drug Administration records, and data on file at Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Pfizer US Pharmaceutical Group, and Merck & Co., Inc., using the search terms celecoxib, rofecoxib, valdecoxib, etoricoxib, lumiracoxib, cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitor, Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, and inflammatory bowel disease, was performed to identify randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials of 5 COX-2 inhibitors in patients with IBD. The publications were fully reviewed for quality. Data on trial design, patient characteristics, intervention drugs, dosages, and outcomes were collected using a predetermined data-extraction form. A meta-analysis was performed based on the publications that met the inclusion/exclusion criteria.

RESULTS

Of 588 studies identified in the electronic search, 574 were excluded after screening the titles and abstracts. Fourteen related to the use of COX-2 inhibitors in patients with IBD were reviewed. Two randomized, controlled trials comparing COX-2 inhibitors with placebo were identified. In the first trial, 82 patients were randomized to receive etoricoxib (60-120 mg/d) and 77 to receive placebo. The exacerbation rates were 10.5% (8/76) in the active-treatment group and 11.4% (8/70) in the placebo group (relative risk [RR], 0.92; 95% CI, 0.37-2.32). In the second trial, 112 patients were treated with celecoxib (200 mg BID) and 110 received placebo. The exacerbation rates were 3.7% (4/107) in the celecoxib group and 2.7% (3/110) in the placebo group (RR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.17-3.18). Of these patients, 5 were lost to follow-up because of AEs. In the meta-analysis comparing COX-2 inhibitors and placebo, the RR was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.39-1.88). No statistically significant differences in IBD relapse rates were found between COX-2 inhibitors and placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

The results from this meta-analysis suggest that insufficient data were available to determine the impact of COX-2 inhibitors on IBD exacerbations. The relatively smaller risk for AEs makes the short-term use of COX-2 inhibitors potentially attractive, but the long-term benefits remain unclear. Further studies with sound methodology and large sample sizes are needed to evaluate the tolerability of COX-2 inhibitors in the treatment of IBD.

The NSAID dilemma: managing osteoarthritis in high-risk patients

For decades, evidence-based data and reported experience have warned that the common chronic oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) therapy for osteoarthritis (OA) in elderly patients is ultimately dangerous. Elderly patients with OA are at heightened risk for developing serious gastrointestional and cardiovascular adverse events, including gastrointestinal bleeding, myocardial infarction, and stroke. Prescribing NSAIDs, especially in an elderly population, continues to be discouraged because of these significant risks. A dilemma exists for individuals who need the established efficacy associated with oral NSAIDs but who are at increased risk for serious adverse events associated with these agents. The goal of this clinical review was to evaluate the risks versus benefits of current options in the treatment of OA. This review found that topical NSAIDs seem to be the safest choice among all options to mitigate gastrointestinal and cardiovascular risks and should be considered prior to the initiation of oral nonselective or cyclooxygenase (COX)-2-selective NSAIDs for individuals presenting with a localized expression of OA. Further research is needed to evaluate and compare these therapies in treating both pain and inflammation effectively while mitigating safety risks in high-risk populations.

Treatment of chronic non-cancer pain

Chronic pain is a pervasive problem that affects the patient, their significant others, and society in many ways. The past decade has seen advances in our understanding of the mechanisms underlying pain and in the availability of technically advanced diagnostic procedures; however, the most notable therapeutic changes have not been the development of novel evidenced-based methods, but rather changing trends in applications and practices within the available clinical armamentarium. We provide a general overview of empirical evidence for the most commonly used interventions in the management of chronic non-cancer pain, including pharmacological, interventional, physical, psychological, rehabilitative, and alternative modalities. Overall, currently available treatments provide modest improvements in pain and minimum improvements in physical and emotional functioning. The quality of evidence is mediocre and has not improved substantially during the past decade. There is a crucial need for assessment of combination treatments, identification of indicators of treatment response, and assessment of the benefit of matching of treatments to patient characteristics.

Nicotinamide alleviates indomethacin-induced gastric ulcers: a novel antiulcer agent

Nicotinamide, a precursor of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD(+)), is an essential nutrient for cell growth that participates in DNA repair and energy production. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)-induced gastropathy is an intricate process involving gastric mucus depletion, increased microvascular permeability, nitric oxide imbalance, as well as free radical production. The present study was conducted to test for the possible gastroprotective effect of nicotinamide utilizing an acute indomethacin-induced gastric ulcer model. Sucralfate possesses antiulcer/antioxidant properties; hence it was used as the reference drug. Indomethacin resulted in hemorrhagic mucosal lesions, increased microvascular permeability, and reduced the gastric mucosal contents of nitric oxide and mucus. Moreover, it produced an imbalance in the mucosal redox state as indicated by a decline of glutathione and glutathione peroxidase, which were associated with increased lipid peroxides. Comparable to sucralfate, nicotinamide markedly decreased the severity of indomethacin-induced gastric lesions and restored the levels of altered biochemical parameters. Gastroprotection afforded by nicotinamide is possibly mediated by conservation of gastric mucus, as well as nitric oxide contents, enhanced gastric microvascular permeability, and its antioxidant properties.

Gastroprotective effect of nicorandil in indomethacin and alcohol-induced acute ulcers

Despite the fact that dietary habits and lifestyles are incredibly advancing, gastric ulceration is still a terrible complaint. Extensive use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and alcohol, in addition to stress, are all predisposing factors for ulcers. Most medical treatments are always time consuming and not efficient or satisfactory to the patients. Cardiovascular patients always need NSAIDs, or mostly cannot quit alcohols, while using many cardiovascular drugs. We aim to study a possible benefit of a common nitrogen oxide donor, anti-anginal drug, nicorandil [N-(2-hydroxyethyl) nicotinamide nitrate ester], in managing acute gastric ulcers through studying its effect on some relevant intermediates to ulcerogenesis as lipid peroxidation, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), and nitric oxide (NO). In addition, gastric mucosal histology was studied to pursue the drug effects on tissue level. Our study revealed that both indomethacin and alcohol induced gastric ulcer mainly through up-regulation of gastric mucosal lipid peroxidation, local tissue inflammation, leukocytic infiltration, and necrosis. Both ulcerogens significantly elevated TNF-alpha and decreased NO, initiating ulcer formation. Nicorandil pretreatment depicted a higher preventive index in indomethacin- (89.8%) and alcohol-induced (77.7%) acute ulceration. On the tissue level, it also protected the gastric mucosa combating leukocyte infiltration and tissue congestion. Nicorandil protected tissue necrosis through decreasing oxidative stress, elevating NO levels, and down-regulating the ulcerogen-induced TNF-alpha elevation and improved sub-mucosal blood supply. We conclude that nicorandil may be a suitable bimodal treatment for cardiovascular patients who are at high risk of gastric ulcers by using variable analgesics to alleviate possible cardiac pain episodes, and probably frequent doses will offer a more established and long-lasting protection.

Association of health-related quality of life with dual use of prescription and over-the-counter nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs

OBJECTIVE

Inadequate prescription therapy pain management, lack of doctor-patient communication about over-the-counter (OTC) medications, and easy accessibility of OTC medications may contribute to patients using more than 1 medication to manage pain. It is well established that taking multiple nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can lead to serious gastrointestinal problems. Little is known about whether use of more than 1 NSAID (i.e., dual use) is related to patient self-reported outcomes, specifically health-related quality of life (HRQOL). We hypothesized that dual use of NSAIDs would be associated with reduced HRQOL.

METHODS

Patients from a managed care organization who filled > or =1 NSAID prescription over a 6-month period were eligible for a telephone interview focusing on NSAID use, which included the Short Form 12 (SF-12) Health Survey. Dual use was defined as taking 2 NSAIDs, either prescription or OTC, at least twice weekly during the past month. A multivariable linear regression model examined the association between dual use and the Physical Component Summary score (PCS-12) from the SF-12.

RESULTS

Dual use was associated with lower PCS-12 scores indicating poorer HRQOL, after controlling for clinical and demographic factors.

CONCLUSION

Patients may self-manage their pain to improve their daily activities by taking more than 1 NSAID. However, by attempting to obtain symptom relief, patients may be putting themselves at risk for complications. Providers are likely unaware of patients' risk. Future research should evaluate the causal factors contributing to dual use.

Healing Properties of Some Indian Medicinal Plants against Indomethacin-Induced Gastric Ulceration of Rats

The healing activity of the ethanol extracts of Piper betel, Emblica officinalis, Terminalia bellerica, and Terminalia chebula against the indomethacin-induced stomach ulceration has been studied and compared with that of misoprostol. Compared to autohealing, all the drugs accelerated the healing process, albeit to different extents. The relative healing activities of the extracts was P. betel>E. officinalis>T. bellerica~T. chebula, that correlated well with their in vivo antioxidant and mucin augmenting activities. The excellent healing activity of the extracts of P. betel and E. officinalis indicated a major role of mucin protection and regeneration in the healing of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs mediated stomach ulceration.

Fatores associados ao uso de antiinflamatórios não esteróides em população de funcionários de uma universidade no Rio de Janeiro: Estudo Pró-Saúde

Os Antiinflamatórios Não-Esteróides (AINE) estão entre os medicamentos mais utilizados no mundo. Estima-se que mais de 30 milhões de pessoas tomem AINE diariamente, apesar de sua toxicidade e de seus efeitos adversos, principalmente gastrointestinais. O presente trabalho utilizou dados seccionais da Fase 1 (1999) de um estudo de coorte (Estudo Pró-Saúde) coletados entre 4.030 funcionários técnico-administrativos de uma universidade no Rio de Janeiro, nos quais foram aplicados questionários autopreenchíveis. Nesse estudo, os AINE apareceram entre os principais produtos consumidos nas duas semanas que antecederam à pesquisa, com prevalência de 7%. Verificou-se que as mulheres têm maior chance de serem usuárias (OR = 2,11; IC 95%: 1,59 - 2,79). Os dados foram submetidos a análise multivariada, tendo sido propostos modelos logísticos por sexo. A carga horária trabalhada na semana foi um importante preditor do uso de AINE (OR = 1,03; IC 95%: 1,01 - 1,04, para homens, e OR = 1,02; IC 95%: 1,00 - 1,03, para mulheres). Dor incapacitante e artrose também se mostraram relevantes, com OR = 2,89 (IC 95%: 1,77 - 4,71) e OR = 2,29 (IC 95%: 1,10 - 4,75), respectivamente, para os homens, e OR = 2,65 (IC 95%: 1,89 - 3,70) e OR = 2,00 (IC 95%: 1,37 - 2,93), respectivamente, para as mulheres. Outros preditores importantes foram a hérnia de disco (OR = 2,27; IC 95%: 0,93 - 5,54) para os homens, e LER (OR = 1,64; IC 95%: 1,15 - 2,35), cálculos vesical (OR = 1,85; IC 95%: 1,00 - 3,45) e renal (OR = 1,81; IC 95%: 1,12 - 2,91) para as mulheres. Mulheres e indivíduos com maior carga horária de trabalho semanal constituem grupos mais vulneráveis, em termos de uso irracional, e, portanto, mais sujeitos a programas de intervenção. Os resultados apontam para a importância das condições de trabalho no processo de desencadeamento de doenças.

SSRIs and upper gastrointestinal bleeding: what is known and how should it influence prescribing?

SSRIs have achieved a high usage rate in the treatment of depression because of a similar efficacy to TCAs and a favourable safety and tolerability profile. However, SSRI use has been associated with bleeding. We reviewed the epidemiological evidence on the association between SSRI use alone and the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding, and on synergistic effects reported with other commonly used drugs that can also cause bleeding.A literature search identified four studies of SSRI use and risk for upper gastrointestinal bleeding and a further two studies of SSRI use and bleeding in general, including upper gastrointestinal bleeding. The available evidence indicates quite convincingly that SSRI use may play a causal role in upper gastrointestinal bleeding and that these drugs may act synergistically with other bleeding risk-increasing medications such as NSAIDs or low-dose aspirin. Assuming a causal role of SSRIs, reported excess gastrointestinal bleedings attributable to SSRI use was reported to be 3.1 per 1000 treatment years, 4.1 per 1000 treatment years among octogenarians and 11.7 per 1000 treatment years among persons with prior upper gastrointestinal bleeding. These non-negligible risks warrant that prescribing doctors consider strategies on the individual level to reduce the likelihood of an upper gastrointestinal adverse event. Patients at particular risk include those with previous ulcers or gastrointestinal bleeding, the elderly and those with certain concurrent illnesses and/or high-risk comedications. Suggested strategies include alternatives to SSRI use, prescribing of less gastrotoxic NSAIDs or co-prescribing of gastroprotective drugs. Patients should be informed about the likelihood of possible upper gastrointestinal bleeding and high-risk patients should be followed closely.

Need for guidelines in gastroenterology for the general practitioner

General practitioners base their clinical strategy on evidence-based medicine and experience. When prospective randomized controlled studies have not provided an answer to a specific clinical question, or when common practice in a certain area is not well established, guidelines formulated by specialists with in-depth knowledge of the field are needed. Studies have shown that gastroenterology guidelines have improved the approach to Helicobacter pylori infection and the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Failure to use these guidelines by general practitioners can lead to diagnostic inconsistencies and faulty patient care. This is particularly important in Israel, where the heterogeneous patient and physician populations are characterized by differences in the interpretation of symptoms, disease prevalence, and education.

Immobilization of Ibuprofen and Copper-Ibuprofen Drugs on Layered Double Hydroxides

The immobilization of the NSAID ibuprofen (Hibp) and the Cu(II)-ibp compound on magnesium-aluminum layered double hydroxides (Mg3Al-LDH) is described. Ibuprofen was intercalated on LDHs by three routes (ion exchange, co-precipitation, and reconstruction). The organic drug and the Cu(II)-ibp were also immobilized by adsorption on LDH external surfaces. Materials were characterized by elemental analysis, UV/VIS, FTIR, and Raman spectroscopies, powder X-ray diffractometry (XRD), thermogravimetry, and electronic paramagnetic resonance (EPR). Mg3Al-(ibp)(cop) (30% w/w of drug/material) and Mg3Al-(ibp)(ie) (33%) materials exhibit bilayer arrangements of ibp anions intercalated between the host layers. Mg3Al-(ibp)(rec) and Mg3Al-(ibp)(ads) contain 13% and 6.2% of ibuprofenate, respectively. Mg3Al-(Cu-ibp)(ads) exhibits two Cu centers in different environments interacting with host layers. Pharmacological potential of materials are compared considering the amounts of immobilized drugs and their buffering properties. Mg3Al-(ibp)(ie) and Mg3Al-(ibp)(cop) exhibit poor buffering property, but contain high ibp amounts. Mg3Al-(ibp)(ads) despite having buffering property, contains low amount of ibuprofen. Mg3Al-(ibp)(rec) combines significant amount of immobilized ibp with good buffering property. Mg3Al-(Cu-ibp)(ads), due to the buffering property, may be an interesting new formulation aiming to decrease gastric irritation.

FORMATION AND PROTEIN BINDING OF THE ACYL GLUCURONIDE OF A LEUKOTRIENE B4ANTAGONIST (SB-209247): RELATION TO SPECIES DIFFERENCES IN HEPATOTOXICITY

SB-209247 [(E)-3-[6-[[(2,6-dichlorophenyl)-thio]methyl]-3-(2-phenylethoxy)-2-pyridinyl]-2-propenoic acid], an anti-inflammatory leukotriene B4 receptor antagonist, was associated in beagle dogs but not male rats with an inflammatory hepatopathy. It also produced a concentration-dependent (10-1000 microM) but equal leakage of enzymes from dog and rat precision-cut liver slices. The hepatic metabolism of SB-209247 was investigated with reference to the formation of reactive acyl glucuronides. [14C]SB-209247 (100 micromol/kg) administered i.v. to anesthetized male rats was eliminated by biliary excretion of the acyl glucuronides of the drug and its sulfoxide. After 5 h, 1.03 +/- 0.14% (mean +/- S.E.M., n = 4) of the dose was bound irreversibly to liver tissue. The sulfoxide glucuronide underwent pH-dependent rearrangement in bile more rapidly than did the SB-209247 conjugate. [14C]SB-209247 was metabolized by sulfoxidation and glucuronidation in rat and dog hepatocytes, and approximately 1 to 2% of [14C]SB-209247 (100 microM) became irreversibly bound to cellular material. [14C]SB-209247 sulfoxide and glucuronide were the only metabolites produced by dog, rat, and human liver microsomes in the presence of NADPH and UDP-glucuronic acid (UDPGA), respectively. V(max) values for [14C]SB-209247 glucuronidation by dog, rat, and human microsomes were 2.6 +/- 0.1, 1.2 +/- 0.1, and 0.4 +/- 0.0 nmol/min/mg protein, respectively. Hepatic microsomes from all three species catalyzed UDPGA-dependent but not NADPH-dependent irreversible binding of [14C]SB-209247 (100-250 microM) to microsomal protein. Although a reactive acyl glucuronide was formed by microsomes from every species, the binding did not differ between species. Therefore, neither the acute cellular injury nor glucuronidation-driven irreversible protein binding in vitro is predictive of the drug-induced hepatopathy.

Predicting the risk for gastrointestinal toxicity in patients taking NSAIDs: the Gastrointestinal Toxicity Survey

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are among the most widely used drugs in the world, but their use is often associated with adverse gastrointestinal (GI) events that may be life threatening in some patients. Development of simple questionnaires for predicting GI events in individuals taking NSAIDs may help to prevent use of these drugs in high-risk patients. The present study was undertaken to test a new questionnaire designed to identify patients at high risk for NSAID-associated GI events--the Gastrointestinal Toxicity Survey (NSAID Induced) (GITS [NI]). In this study, results for GITS (NI) were compared with those for an established questionnaire, the Stanford Calculator of Risk for Events (SCORE), in a small cohort of 400 patients. Feasible generalized least squares (FGLS) and multinomial logistic (MNL) regression were used to perform the comparison. The overall correlation between results for GITS (NI) responses and the total score for the SCORE questionnaire was 0.962 (P < .0001). The agreement between the 2 instruments with respect to their ability to predict the same risk for NSAID-induced GI events was similar for both FGLS and MNL. For 4 levels of risk, the agreement was approximately 80% between the 2 instruments. For 3 levels of risk, the agreement was approximately 90%. This study showed that results obtained with GITS (NI) are highly correlated with those from SCORE and that GITS (NI) may provide physicians with information that will help them avoid administering NSAIDs to patients who are at high risk for adverse GI reactions.

Reducing Clinically Significant Gastrointestinal Toxicity Associated with Nonsteroidal Antiinflammatory Drugs

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the efficacy of treatment strategies to reduce clinically significant gastrointestinal adverse effects associated with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).

DATA SOURCES:

A MEDLINE search (1966–November 2003) was performed to identify relevant articles. Key search terms included proton-pump inhibitors, histamine H2 antagonists, misoprostol, cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) selective inhibitors, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory agents, stomach ulcer, prevention, and economics. Additional references were obtained from cross-referencing the bibliographies of selected articles.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION:

All information obtained from the MEDLINE search was reviewed. To provide the most clinically relevant information, only randomized controlled trials are included in this review.

DATA SYNTHESIS:

Clinically significant upper gastrointestinal adverse events, such as ulcers and ulcer complications, associated with NSAIDs are a cause of significant morbidity and mortality in the US. Interest in strategies to reduce the risk of these adverse events is high among clinicians and patients. Misoprostol, high-dose H2-receptor antagonists, proton-pump inhibitors, and COX-2 inhibitors have been shown to reduce this risk. Misoprostol and proton-pump inhibitors are more effective than H2-receptor antagonists; dose-related diarrhea limits the clinical utility of misoprostol. These strategies may not provide enough protection in patients taking concomitant low-dose aspirin therapy or patients with a history of ulcer complications.

CONCLUSIONS:

COX-2 inhibitors and proton-pump inhibitors are effective and well-tolerated therapies to reduce clinically significant upper gastrointestinal adverse events associated with NSAIDs.

Cyclooxygenases, the kidney, and hypertension

Selective cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors that are in widespread clinical use were developed to avoid side effects of conventional NSAIDs, including gastrointestinal and renal toxicity. However, COX-2 is constitutively expressed in the kidney and is highly regulated in response to alterations in intravascular volume. COX-2 metabolites have been implicated in maintenance of renal blood flow, mediation of renin release, and regulation of sodium excretion. COX-2 inhibition may transiently decrease urine sodium excretion in some subjects and induce mild to moderate elevation of blood pressure. Furthermore, in conditions of relative intravascular volume depletion and/or renal hypoperfusion, interference with COX-2 activity can have deleterious effects on maintenance of renal blood flow and glomerular filtration rate. In addition to physiological regulation of COX-2 expression in the kidney, increased renal cortical COX-2 expression is seen in experimental models associated with altered renal hemodynamics and progressive renal injury (decreased renal mass, poorly controlled diabetes), and long-term treatment with selective COX-2 inhibitors ameliorates functional and structural renal damage in these conditions.

Tips for managing chronic pain. Implementing the latest guidelines

Recently revised guidelines from the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) call for an increased awareness of the impact of chronic pain and recommend that physicians assess and treat pain complaints seriously. Although significant and persistent chronic pain is a common reason for primary care visits, the incidence of psychologic distress and personality disorder in patients with chronic pain often makes this population a difficult one for physicians and staff to treat. This discussion offers practical tips for managing patients with chronic pain and reducing staff burnout. The author also dispels various myths about chronic pain and focuses on the effective management of its comorbidities.

Understanding NSAIDs: from aspirin to COX-2

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) annually account for 70 million prescriptions and 30 billion over-the-counter (OTC) medications sold in the United States alone. Despite our familiarity with these drugs, NSAIDs are full of paradoxes that pose significant challenges for the medical community. Although NSAIDs are among the oldest of drugs, new formulations continue to come to market. Some formulas are safe enough to be sold OTC for use in infants with fever, while others are available only as a prescription medication and are a leading cause of iatrogenic reactions, hospitalizations, and death. Physicians face the choice of prescribing lower cost, older NSAIDs versus the more expensive but potentially safer ones. The use of NSAIDs is clearly increasing. Factors contributing to this increase are the availability of OTC preparations and the aging of the population with a concomitant increase in osteoarthritis. One indication of the popularity of NSAIDs is that following the introduction of 2 new cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) selective inhibitors in 1999, these drugs immediately became the most frequently prescribed new drugs in the United States. This article will familiarize the practitioner with the various types of NSAIDs, including the newer COX-2 formulations, their mechanism of action, and potential adverse reactions and efficacy. Although most practitioners are aware of the indications for NSAIDs, research is continuing to explore nontraditional applications. A new framework is being created that will allow new additions to the NSAID class of medications.

Approaches to healing and prophylaxis of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-associated ulcers

Treating and preventing peptic ulcers associated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) calls for clinical judgment. Physicians must weigh their patients' need for anti-inflammatory therapy against their individual risks for ulcer development; their likelihood of coping with an ulcer complication if it should develop; and the economics, efficacy, and tolerability of various treatment and prevention options. This article considers some general strategies common to both treatment and prevention. Data from randomized trials that can guide clinicians and their patients as they attempt to heal an established NSAID ulcer or prevent one occurring in the future are also reviewed.