Calcium channel blockers as antihypertensive agents

ERdj3 is an endoplasmic reticulum degradation factor for mutant glucocerebrosidase variants linked to Gaucher's disease

Gaucher's disease (GD) is caused by mutations that compromise β-glucocerebrosidase (GCase) folding in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), leading to excessive degradation instead of trafficking, which results in insufficient lysosomal function. We hypothesized that ER GCase interacting proteins play critical roles in making quality control decisions, i.e., facilitating ER-associated degradation (ERAD) instead of folding and trafficking. Utilizing GCase immunoprecipitation followed by mass-spectrometry-based proteomics, we identified endogenous HeLa cell GCase protein interactors, including ERdj3, an ER resident Hsp40 not previously established to interact with GCase. Depleting ERdj3 reduced the rate of mutant GCase degradation in patient-derived fibroblasts, while increasing folding, trafficking, and function by directing GCase to the profolding ER calnexin pathway. Inhibiting ERdj3-mediated mutant GCase degradation while simultaneously enhancing calnexin-associated folding, by way of a diltiazem-mediated increase in ER Ca(2+) levels, yields a synergistic rescue of L444P GCase lysosomal function. Our findings suggest a combination therapeutic strategy for ameliorating GD.

Hypertension and renal disease

Systemic hypertension is commonly associated with chronic renal failure in dogs and cats. Consequences of systemic hypertension are manifested by pathologic changes involving the eyes, heart, central nervous system, and/or kidneys. These changes may be prevented or reversed by diagnosing and treating systemic hypertension. Therefore, blood pressure determination and ophthalmic examination should be performed routinely in animals with chronic renal failure. Therapy for systemic hypertension associated with chronic renal failure should be initiated cautiously with the goal being to lower arterial pressure below values considered to be hypertensive. Therapy may involve nonpharmacologic strategies and/or hypertensive drugs. This article discusses pathophysiologic mechanisms, consequences, diagnosis, and treatment of systemic hypertension associated with chronic renal failure in dogs and cats.

Clinical experience with a once-daily, extended-release formulation of diltiazem in the treatment of hypertension

Although calcium channel blockers were only recently approved for antihypertensive therapy, 10 years of data have demonstrated their beneficial effects. Among the available calcium channel blockers, diltiazem hydrochloride appears to have a highly favorable side-effect profile. A new, extended-release formulation of diltiazem has been developed for the treatment of essential hypertension. The safety and efficacy of various once-daily doses of this new formulation were assessed in two multicenter studies. The first study was a dose-ranging trial of 275 patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. Patients were randomly assigned to once-daily diltiazem (120, 240, 360, or 480 mg) or placebo for a 4-week, double-blind treatment period. A patient subgroup underwent ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) twice. Once-daily diltiazem (dose range, 240-480 mg) significantly lowered trough systolic and diastolic blood pressure in a clearly dose-related fashion. ABPM results demonstrated consistent decreases in systolic and diastolic blood pressure throughout the 24-hour dosing interval. Dosages greater than or equal to 240 mg/day provided trough drug blood levels within the therapeutic range (i.e., greater than or equal to 40 ng/mL). The second study was a forced-escalation trail of 115 patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. Patients were randomized to treatment with either placebo or escalating dosages of diltiazem (180 mg/day for 2 weeks, 360 mg/day for 2 weeks, and then 540 mg/day for 2 weeks). Statistically significant (p less than 0.01) reductions in supine systolic and diastolic blood pressure were observed with the 360 mg/day and 540 mg/day dosages. Dose escalations resulted in incremental blood pressure reductions and an increase in the percentage of responders. There was a significant correlation between diltiazem peak and trough plasma concentrations and antihypertensive effects in both studies, supporting the 24-hour efficacy of this extended-release formulation. Diltiazem administered once daily was found to be safe and well tolerated by the patients in these studies; adverse events were generally mild, with an incidence similar to placebo. Results indicate that this new extended-release formulation of diltiazem, administered once daily in doses greater than 120 mg, effectively lowers systolic and diastolic blood pressure in patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension.

Assessment of left ventricular function after sublingual administration of nifedipine in patients with moderate to severe hypertension

To evaluate the left ventricular functional changes induced by acute decreases in blood pressure in 15 patients with systemic hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy, this study used Doppler and M-mode echocardiographic derived left ventricular indices. After 30 minutes of administration of sublingual nifedipine, both systolic and diastolic blood pressure decreased and heart rates increased. The left ventricular end-systolic dimension decreased but not the end-diastolic dimension, which suggests that sublingual nifedipine may decrease only afterload, not preload. Total peripheral resistance decreased from 2770 to 1960 dyne.sec.cm-5. The M-mode-derived peak rate of dimension changes improved both the systolic and diastolic phase, and Doppler-derived indices of atrial contribution to ventricular filling decreased. Because both the systolic and diastolic phase indices of LV function are sensitive to variations in both preload and afterload, the improvement of myocardial contractility per se cannot necessarily be attributed to the direct effect of the drug to myocardium. Though favorable effects on the myocardial oxygen supply-demand ratio or increased adrenergic tone stimulated by the decline in systemic arterial pressures may contribute to the augmentation of LV systolic and diastolic function observed after nifedipine in the present study, the apparent augmentation of LV function appears to be attributable primarily to afterload reduction.

Insulin resistance and hypertension

The author has reviewed the development of the concept that insulin resistance is related not only to the hypertensive state but potentially to the initiation and maintenance of high blood pressure. Potential sequelae of insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia, as they apply to atherogenesis, are also discussed. The impact of present antihypertensive pharmacologic therapy on insulin resistance is addressed, as are future directions in pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic management of hypertension. In addition, the author speculates on possible mechanisms leading to insulin resistance in hypertension.

Clinical neuropharmacology of calcium antagonists

Experimental and clinical data clearly demonstrate that calcium antagonists (CA) may have an action on the central nervous system (CNS). The cerebrovascular action of CA justifies their use in cerebral ischaemia, vasospasm and hypoxia. Several clinical trials have demonstrated such beneficial effects. On the other hand a number of reports indicate that CA may have a direct neuronal effect, although most of such trials have not been verified or are mere case reports. In addition, the large number of conditions susceptible to being corrected by CA is impressive: epilepsy, pain, dystonia, dyskinesia, psychiatric conditions, etc. Other papers are disconcerting that report extrapyramidal disorders induced by flunarizine and cinnarizine in the elderly, whereas nicardipine does not produce such side effects and may even alleviate some parkinsonian symptoms. In various experimental models (e.g. stroke, oedema), pharmacological effects have been shown to vary from one compound to the other. Two main questions are yet to be answered: 1) has the direct neuronal effect of CA been clearly established? 2) are the multiple clinical effects on the CNS really linked to calcium antagonism?

Antihypertensive effect of diltiazem in a slow-release formulation for mild to moderate essential hypertension

The antihypertensive efficacy and frequency of adverse reactions following administration of diltiazem in a new slow-release formulation were compared with placebo in 34 patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension in a randomized, double-blind, crossover study. After 6 weeks of treatment with diltiazem (240 or 360 mg/day), average supine blood pressure (BP) decreased from 165 +/- 21/101 +/- 5 mm Hg at baseline to 152 +/- 16/93 +/- 4 mm Hg compared with 160 +/- 19/100 +/- 7 mm Hg with placebo (p less than 0.01/p less than 0.001). Standing BP decreased from 162 +/- 20/107 +/- 6 mm Hg at baseline to 150 +/- 14/101 +/- 5 mm Hg compared to 159 +/- 18/107 +/- 8 mm Hg with placebo (p less than 0.01/p less than 0.001). The supine heart rate after diltiazem was 65 +/- 7 beats/min and after placebo 69 +/- 9 beats/min (p less than 0.01). There were no hematologic side effects. Only minor differences between diltiazem and placebo were observed in some of the biochemical laboratory values. Four patients were withdrawn due to side effects during treatment with diltiazem and 2 with placebo. Diltiazem in a slow-release formulation given twice a day lowered blood pressure significantly as monotherapy in patients with mild to moderate hypertension and was well tolerated.

Hemodynamic response, safety, and efficacy of isradipine in the treatment of essential hypertension

The hemodynamic response achieved by isradipine is balanced; there is a marked decrease in total peripheral resistance with no clinically significant tachycardia or cardiodepressant effect, no fluid retention (natriuretic/diuretic effect) or orthostatic reactions, whereas the blood flow to vital organs is preserved. The blood pressure-lowering effect of isradipine as monotherapy is dose dependent and has shown a greater efficacy than propranolol, hydrochlorothiazide, and prazosin, without an increase in adverse effects. Combination therapy with a beta-blocker is also safe and offers a useful additional reduction in blood pressure. Indeed, the side effects are no more frequent than with placebo (in doses below 10 mg daily); they are also dose dependent and appear to diminish with time. Isradipine's antiatherogenic effects and cardiac protection potential require further evaluation in clinical studies, but add an interesting aspect to the drug. Against this background, isradipine appears to be a useful addition to our therapeutic arsenal and has the potential to become the drug of choice in the treatment of hypertension.

Use of cardiovascular drugs in the elderly. What difference does age make?

Pharmacologic treatment of cardiovascular disease is both challenging and rewarding. Multiple medications and the variable nature of most cardiac problems necessitate careful monitoring of drug regimens in patients of any age. The elderly require even more attention to optimize therapy in light of variable drug absorption, effects, metabolism, and excretion. This challenge will present itself more frequently as the US population ages.

Effect of diltiazem on left ventricular mass and diastolic filling in mild to moderate hypertension

It is still uncertain whether antihypertensive therapy with calcium antagonists in general, and diltiazem in particular, can reduce left ventricular (LV) mass index and improve LV diastolic filling in hypertension. Therefore, 24 patients with mild to moderate hypertension (diastolic blood pressure 95 to 114 mm Hg before therapy) were randomly assigned to receive either a sustained-release preparation of diltiazem (n = 13) or placebo (n = 11) for 16 weeks in a double-blind, parallel-group protocol. M-mode and pulsed Doppler echocardiograms were performed at baseline and at the end of monotherapy. Echocardiograms were read blindly by 2 independent observers. The patients who received placebo exhibited no change in blood pressure, cardiac dimensions or LV function. Diltiazem significantly reduced both systolic pressure (151 +/- 14 to 139 +/- 12 mm Hg) and diastolic pressure (101 +/- 4 to 90 +/- 7 mm Hg, both p less than 0.05). Posterior wall and septal wall thicknesses decreased, but the changes were not statistically significant. End-diastolic dimension was reduced by diltiazem from 53 +/- 5 to 51 +/- 5 mm (p less than 0.05). LV mass index decreased significantly with diltiazem by 10%, from 125 +/- 21 to 113 +/- 23 g/m2 (p less than 0.05). The LV wall thickness to radius ratio remained unchanged during both diltiazem and placebo treatments. Changes in LV mass index and blood pressure did not correlate, suggesting that this response is influenced by factors other than pressure reduction alone.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Monotherapy of hypertension with darodipine: a new calcium-channel blocker

Calcium-channel blockers are increasingly used as single agents for the treatment of essential hypertension. Following three weeks of single-blind placebo therapy, 43 patients with essential hypertension were randomized into four groups. Group 1 (10 patients) received placebo twice a day, Group 2 (13 patients) received darodipine (PY 108-068) 50 mg twice a day, Group 3 (9 patients) received darodipine 100 mg twice a day, and Group 4 (11 patients) received darodipine 150 mg twice a day. Patients were seen in the clinic weekly for 4 weeks. Clinical and laboratory evaluations were done on each patient. Darodipine caused a sustained decrease in the supine and standing systolic and diastolic blood pressure (p less than .001) and there were no significant pressure differences between the three drug dosages. The effects of the drug on heart rate were not consistent. Placebo had no effect on either blood pressure or heart rate. Side effects were few, mild, and consisted of headaches and peripheral edema, and did not necessitate discontinuation of the drug. No metabolic abnormalities were seen with either low or high doses of the drug. We conclude that: (1) darodipine is effective, safe, and well tolerated; (2) its antihypertensive effectiveness is similar at high and low doses, although the higher doses seemed to have a slightly greater effect on the diastolic arterial pressure; (3) the low dose may be preferable since side effects were dose related.

Demographic considerations in the selection of antihypertensive therapy

Because of the growing number of antihypertensive agents that are suitable for initial therapy in mild and moderate hypertension, it is important to identify factors that influence the response to various medications. Although individual patient considerations, such as associated illnesses and potential side effects, are of primary importance in choosing therapy, the influence of demographic factors has received increasing attention. The effect of age, race and gender on the response to antihypertensive therapy will be examined. Several studies have indicated that the beta blockers and angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are more effective in younger than in older patients. Conversely, there is a trend toward greater responses in older subjects to the diuretics and calcium antagonists. In the few studies available that have compared agents in various classes, it appears that diuretics, and probably calcium antagonists, are significantly more effective than beta blockers or ACE inhibitors in patients over 60 years of age. However, the interdrug differences in young patients are probably less important. With regard to race, the relative lack of effect of beta blockers and ACE inhibitors in blacks is well accepted; in comparative studies, diuretics proved significantly better. From the few available studies, it does not appear that the calcium antagonists are more potent in either racial group, but they may be superior to the beta blockers and ACE inhibitors in blacks. Far less information is available concerning differences in antihypertensive responses between men and women. There is some suggestion that women may be less responsive to beta blockers than men.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Acute and chronic studies of diltiazem in elderly versus young hypertensive patients

The pharmacodynamics, disposition and hormonal responses to acute intravenous and chronic oral diltiazem treatment were compared in young and elderly hypertensive patients. In elderly patients, supine diastolic blood pressure decreased significantly during the first week of treatment (baseline mean +/- standard error of the mean, 100 +/- 1 to 93 +/- 2 mm Hg) and decreased further during the study to 86 +/- 2 mm Hg at the end of the study. Diastolic blood pressure of the young patients decreased significantly by the third week of treatment (from 104 +/- 2 to 97 +/- 3 mm Hg) and decreased further during the study to 94 +/- 2 mm Hg at the end of the study. Baseline supine systolic blood pressure was greater in elderly than in young patients (167 +/- 5 vs 144 +/- 3 mm Hg; p less than 0.01) and was significantly reduced in the elderly by the fourth week (167 +/- 5 to 154 +/- 3 mm Hg; p less than 0.003), with a significantly reduction sustained throughout the 14-week period. Young patients had little change in systolic blood pressure. Supine heart rate tended to decrease in both groups during the 14-week period. Acute intravenous diltiazem pharmacokinetics determined at the beginning of the study showed that total diltiazem clearance was similar in elderly (13.3 +/- 1.0 ml/min/kg) and young (13.7 +/- 1.9 ml/min/kg) patients as was volume of distribution (4.2 +/- 0.3 vs 4.3 +/- 0.6 liters/kg) and elimination half-life (3.78 +/- 0.19 vs 3.69 +/- 0.23 hours).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Nifedipine in hypertensive emergencies: a prospective study

Hypertensive emergencies usually present to the emergency department. Nifedipine was administered to 15 patients presenting to the emergency department with a diastolic blood pressure greater than 120 mm Hg with chest pain, shortness of breath, or focal neurological symptoms. Average blood pressure on entry was 215/134.9 mm Hg and decreased to 158/88 mm Hg over a two-hour period. No patient had any worsening of symptoms or suffered deleterious effects. All patients with pulmonary edema or chest pain noted prompt improvement in symptoms. One patient became hypotensive without clinical significance. Two patients failed to respond to nifedipine and were treated with nitroprusside. Nifedipine appears to be safe and effective in the management of hypertensive crises.

Diltiazem versus propranolol in essential hypertension: responses of rest and exercise blood pressure and effects on exercise capacity

Both beta-blocking and calcium channel-blocking drugs are being used with increasing frequency as initial therapy for essential hypertension. The present study was designed to compare the antihypertensive effects of a beta-blocking drug, propranolol, with a calcium channel-blocking drug, diltiazem, at rest and during upright bicycle exercise and to determine whether exercise capacity is altered by these therapies. Twenty-one patients with uncomplicated systemic hypertension and a diastolic blood pressure (BP) of 95 to 110 mm Hg without medication were randomly assigned to propranolol or diltiazem therapy in a double-blind manner. The total daily dosages were titrated as needed, from 160 to 480 mg of propranolol (mean 371 mg) and 120 to 360 mg of diltiazem (mean 307 mg) over 12 weeks, and the titrated dose was maintained for 4 additional weeks. Both drugs significantly reduced supine BP (from 149 +/- 14/101 +/- 4 to 136 +/- 17/89 +/- 10 mm Hg with propranolol and from 157 +/- 14/103 +/- 4 to 144 +/- 13/93 +/- 8 with diltiazem. Only diltiazem reduced BP during submaximal exercise, but both agents produced significant responses during maximal exercise. Diltiazem had no effect on maximal heart rate, exercise duration or O2 uptake, whereas propranolol reduced maximal VO2 from 27 +/- 6 to 22 +/- 6 ml/min/kg (p less than 0.01) and also shortened duration of exercise. Propranolol, despite its effects on heart rate, maintained the workload VO2 relation at submaximal loads, suggesting an increased oxygen delivery. However, these adaptive mechanisms appear to be insufficient during maximal effort.

Treatment of essential hypertension with PN 200-110 (isradipine)

The safety and antihypertensive efficacy of PN 200-110 (isradipine), a novel calcium antagonist, are discussed in a preliminary report of double-blind, multicenter, controlled, phase III clinical trials for essential hypertension. Patients who qualified for entry after a 3 week placebo-washout period were enrolled in 1 of 5 studies; 2 studies were placebo controlled; 3 studies evaluated PN 200-110 against 1 of 3 active controls: hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) propranolol or prazosin. A separate study assessing the effects of PN 200-110 in combination with HCTZ versus propranolol plus HCTZ is also discussed. Compared with placebo, PN 200-110 decreased mean supine systolic and diastolic blood pressures by 20/16 mm Hg versus 4/6 mm Hg. Compared with placebo and active control drugs, PN 200-110 normalized supine diastolic blood pressure to less than or equal to 90 mm Hg in 72% of patients, versus 13% in the placebo group, 74% in the HCTZ group, 45% in the propranolol group and 69% in the prazosin group. In the ability to decrease diastolic blood pressure by greater than or equal to 10 mm Hg, PN 200-110 compared favorably to prazosin (81% vs 81%), and was superior to HCTZ (81% vs 61%) and propranolol (81% vs 36%). In combination with HCTZ, PN 200-110 exerted as great an antihypertensive effect as propranolol plus HCTZ. Long-term therapy with PN 200-110 was also effective. Supine systolic and diastolic blood pressures decreased a mean of 15/13 mm Hg at 3 months, and 18/20 mm Hg at 12 months. PN 200-110 is well tolerated with relatively few adverse effects reported.

Effects of dihydropyridines on tension and calcium-45 influx in isolated mesenteric resistance vessels from spontaneously hypertensive and normotensive rats

Contractile tension responses to norepinephrine and depolarizing potassium (80 mM K+), as well as calcium-45 influx stimulated by these agents, were studied in isolated mesenteric resistance vessels (each 100 microM internal diameter) from spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs) and from normotensive Wistar Kyoto rats (WKYs). Inhibitory effects of 2 dihydropyridine Ca++ antagonists, PN 200-110 (isradipine) and nisoldipine, on these parameters were also determined. Contractile responses to 80 mM K+ were inhibited by both Ca++ antagonists with the same potency and efficacy in SHR compared with WKY vessels (PN 200-110 IC50 = 2.8 +/- 1.3 X 10(-8) M in SHRs and 2.5 +/- 1.5 X 10(-8) M in WKYs; nisoldipine IC50 = 1.1 +/- 0.4 X 10(-8) M in SHRs and 1.2 +/- 0.9 X 10(-8) M in WKYs). However, contractile responses to norepinephrine (10(-4) M) were inhibited less potently by nisoldipine in SHR vessels (IC50 = 2.2 +/- 0.3 X 10(-9) M) compared with WKY vessels (IC50 = 1.6 +/- 0.6 X 10(-10) M). Similarly, PN 200-110 tended to be less (but not significantly less) potent in SHR vessels (IC50 = 3.3 +/- 1.8 X 10(-8) M) than in WKY vessels (IC50 = 3.4 +/- 0.9 X 10(-9) M); its efficacy was significantly depressed in the SHR vessels (by approximately 20%). When norepinephrine-stimulated calcium-45 influx was determined in the presence of these Ca++ antagonists, a similar profile emerged with respect to a comparison of SHR and WKY vessels. These results support a previously hypothesized alteration in receptor-activated Ca++ influx pathways in SHR mesenteric resistance vessels.

Ca-channel blockers and the electrophysiology of synaptic transmission of the guinea-pig olfactory cortex

Slices of guinea-pig olfactory cortex have been used to compare the potency of various Ca-blockers on the electrophysiology of synaptic transmission. Listed in the order of potency, the divalent cations Cd2+, Ni2+, Mn2+, Co2+, La3+ and Mg2+ depressed synaptic transmission. The organic Ca-blockers, nifedipine or nimodipine or verapamil and diltiazem were ineffective up to 0.01 mmol/l. Verapamil, D600 or diltiazem (0.1-0.3 mmol/l) depressed both synaptic transmission and the sodium-mediated presynaptic action potential. These results reaffirm the idea that 'organic Ca-antagonist' do not block all Ca-channels in brain and the high Cd2+ sensitivity suggests the Ca-channels in post- and presynaptic membranes have dissimilar pharmacological profiles.

Comparison and additivity of nitrendipine and hydrochlorothiazide in systemic hypertension

Calcium channel blockers are highly effective antihypertensive agents and provide a good alternative to other medications used as initial or monotherapy. Although the calcium channel blockers act as peripheral vasodilators, they are unique among this group of drugs in lowering blood pressure in a sustained manner; several compensatory mechanisms are inhibited by virtue of either direct or indirect effects of these agents. In recent years, hypertension has generally been treated with a step-care approach, the limitations of which are now becoming apparent. Today, 4 classes of agents are effective and well tolerated as single therapy and might therefore be considered as first-line drug therapy: diuretics, beta blockers, converting enzyme inhibitors and calcium channel blockers. Preliminary results from an ongoing double-blind randomized trial comparing nitrendipine (a calcium channel blocker) and hydrochlorothiazide (a diuretic) in mild to moderate hypertension will be presented. Results from 63 patients showed the 2 agents to be equivalent in antihypertensive effects and in frequency of adverse reactions. Other data indicate that when nitrendipine and hydrochlorothiazide were combined, a further decrease in blood pressure was observed. Patient characteristics affecting drug choice and clinical situations in which calcium channel blockers can be used most effectively can now often be delineated.

Comparative effects of bepridil and diltiazem on systemic blood pressure and isolated peripheral arteries in spontaneously hypertensive rats

Bepridil and diltiazem were studied for their effects on blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) of spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) and on vascular tone of femoral and mesenteric arterial strips from SHR. The drugs (i.v.) reduced BP and HR more markedly in SHR than in normotensive Wistar Kyoto rats (WKY). The effects of bepridil were less pronounced and less prolonged than those of diltiazem. Bepridil relaxed arterial strips precontracted by KCl or prostaglandin F2 alpha to almost the same extent as diltiazem in both SHR and WKY. Bepridil was almost as potent as diltiazem in inhibiting non-competitively the Ca2+-evoked contractions of arteries depolarized in a Ca2+-free, high K+ buffer. alpha-Adrenoceptor agonist-induced contractions accompanied and not accompanied by Ca2+ influx were inhibited more markedly by bepridil than diltiazem under certain conditions. The inhibitions were more marked in SHR than in WKY. Thus, it was suggested that both drugs acted as Ca2+ influx inhibitor to reduce vascular tone. Bepridil inhibited intracellular vasoconstriction mechanisms linked with alpha-adrenoceptors more potently than did diltiazem in SHR. Taken together, these actions can explain the antihypertensive properties of both drugs in SHR.

Diltiazem as monotherapy for systemic hypertension: a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

A multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel group study of diltiazem in essential hypertension was carried out in 77 patients (40 diltiazem, 37 placebo) with stable supine diastolic blood pressure (BP) between 95 and 110 mm Hg. Patients were withdrawn from previous antihypertensive therapy for at least 4 weeks, titrated to the optimal dose, and followed for a total of 12 weeks during therapy. A diltiazem dose of 360 mg/day was required in 85% of the patients. Average BP in all positions was significantly (p less than 0.0001) reduced by diltiazem compared with placebo. With diltiazem, average supine BP fell from 156/100 mm Hg at baseline to 141/87 at end titration and 145/90 mm Hg at week 12, whereas average standing BP fell from 152/101 mm Hg to 136/90 and 143/91 mm Hg, respectively, at those times. There was no significant change in heart rate at week 12. Diltiazem tended to be more effective in older patients, but caused no increase in orthostatic BP drop. There were no statistically significant changes in BP in the placebo group. Two patients receiving placebo and 1 patient receiving diltiazem discontinued therapy as a result of adverse effects, and overall, side effects were only slightly more common with diltiazem treatment. Thus, diltiazem was effective and well tolerated single therapy for mild to moderate systemic hypertension and appears to compare favorably to most agents being used.

Immediate and short-term hemodynamic effects of diltiazem in patients with hypertension

The immediate effects of intravenous diltiazem effects and short-term (4 weeks) of the oral drug on systemic and regional hemodynamics, cardiac structure, and humoral responses were evaluated by previously reported methods in nine patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension and in one patient with primary aldosteronism. Diltiazem was first administered in three intravenous doses of 0.06, 0.06, and 0.12 mg/kg, respectively; patients were then treated for 4 weeks with daily doses ranging from 240 to 360 mg (average 300 mg). Intravenous diltiazem immediately reduced mean arterial pressure (from 115 +/- 3 to 96 +/- 3 mm Hg; p less than .01) through a fall in total peripheral resistance index (from 37 +/- 3 to 23 +/- 2 U/m2; p less than .01) that was associated with an increase in heart rate (from 66 +/- 2 to 77 +/- 3 beats/min; p less than .01) and cardiac index (from 3.3 +/- 0.3 to 4.3 +/- 0.4 liters/min/m2; p less than .01). These changes were not associated with changes in plasma levels of catecholamines or aldosterone or in plasma renin activity. After 4 weeks the significant decrease in mean arterial pressure persisted (104 +/- 3 mm Hg; p less than .01) and there were still no changes in the humoral substances or plasma volume. Renal blood flow index increased (from 368 +/- 52 to 462 +/- 57 ml/min/m2; p less than .01) and renal vascular resistance index decreased (from 0.37 +/- 0.06 to 0.26 +/- 0.04 U/m2; p less than .01), while splanchnic hemodynamics did not change.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Long-term renal and systemic effects of calcium entry blockers in normotensive and experimental hypertensive dogs

The effect of diltiazem administered as a sustained infusion (10 to 15 micrograms/kg/min) was studied in 3 groups of conscious instrumented dogs: 4 normotensive, 5 Goldblatt hypertensive (GH) and 4 deoxycorticosterone acetate salt treated Goldblatt hypertensive (DSGH) dogs. Mean arterial blood pressure, left renal blood flow and heart rate were monitored, and the plasma renin activity was determined in a control session and after 3 to 5 days of diltiazem infusion in the normotensive and after 5 to 8 days of infusion in the 2 hypertensive groups. Pressor and renal blood flow responses to phenylephrine, norepinephrine and angiotensin II were also determined in the control session and on the last day of the diltiazem infusion. Mean arterial blood pressure was found to be decreased at the 5 to 8-day interval in the DSGHs and in the GHs, but the change in the latter group was not statistically significant. Mean arterial blood pressure was unchanged in the normotensives. Renal vascular resistance was decreased by diltiazem in the normotensive group at 3 to 5 days and in the DSGHs at 1 to 2 days. Heart rate was not significantly affected by diltiazem in the hypertensive groups, but was increased in the normotensive group at the 1 to 2-day interval. Plasma renin activity tended to increase in the hypertensive, but not in the normotensive dogs. Pressor and renal blood flow responses to all the agonist agents tested were decreased in the presence of diltiazem.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The evolution of antihypertensive therapy

Beginning in the early 1950s, when a ganglioplegic agent and a vasodilator were used in combination to provide long-term control of severe hypertension, which neither drug alone could control, much has been learned about the management of hypertension from the use of new antihypertensive agents in man and from clinical trials of antihypertensive regimens. Some of this information includes: the unexpected yet very real hazards as well as benefits associated with the long-term use of powerful drugs, in particular the original description of hydralazine-induced lupus, its relation to genetic markers and its association with control of hypertension; the apparently decreasing need for antihypertensive drugs in subjects with well-controlled severe and moderate hypertension; the identification of risk factors for the complications of hypertension and the quantitation of their effects; the decrease in the incidence of hypertensive complications associated with the pharmacologic treatment of severe, moderate and, at least, the upper ranges of mild hypertension; the possibility of designing a chemical to block a specific reaction and the realization that it would have broader than expected effects; and the primary prevention of myocardial infarction in very high risk subjects.

Comparison of the effects of labetalol and hydrochlorothiazide on the ventilatory function of hypertensive patients with asthma and propranolol sensitivity

Previous studies have shown that labetalol, a new alpha- and beta-adrenergic antagonist, is relatively safe for the treatment of hypertension in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This multicenter study was designed to evaluate its effects in hypertensive patients with asthma and propranolol sensitivity. Hypertension was successfully controlled in 18 of 21 patients who received labetalol in increasing doses, up to 1,200 mg/day. The decrease in mean FEV1 (1.5 percent) two hours after the highest dose of labetalol was not statistically significant, although there was a gradual decline in mean baseline FEV1 during the four-week treatment period. Antihypertensive agents other than adrenergic antagonists should be considered for the management of hypertension in patients with asthma, especially those with marked reversibility of airflow. If treatment with beta-adrenergic antagonists is indicated, labetalol is recommended over other currently available agents.