Clinical significance of the FV:Q506 mutation in unselected oncology patients

Impact of hereditary thrombophilia on cancer-associated thrombosis, tumour susceptibility and progression: A review of existing evidence

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a cardiovascular disorder frequently diagnosed among cancer patients. Aside from being common, VTE severely deteriorates the prognosis of these patients as they face a higher risk of morbidity and mortality, which makes clinical tools able to identify the patients more prompt to thrombogenesis very attractive. Over the years, several genetic polymorphisms have been linked with VTE susceptibility in the general population. However, their clinical usefulness as predictive biomarkers for cancer-related VTE is yet unclear. Furthermore, as a two-way association between cancer and VTE is well-recognized, with haemostatic components fuelling tumour progression, haemostatic gene polymorphisms constitute potential cancer predictive and/or prognostic biomarkers as well. Thus, in this article, we review the existing evidence on the role of these polymorphisms on cancer-related VTE and their impact on cancer onset and progression. Despite the promising findings, the existing studies had inconsistent results most likely due to their limited statistical power and population heterogeneity. Future studies are therefore required to clarify the role of these polymorphisms in setting of malignancy.

Cancer-associated thrombosis: The search for the holy grail continues

Cancer patients have an increased risk of developing venous thromboembolism (VTE), a condition that is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Although risk assessment tools have been developed, it is still very challenging to predict which cancer patients will suffer from VTE. The scope of this review is to summarize and discuss studies focusing on the link between genetic alterations and risk of cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT). Thus far, classical risk factors that contribute to VTE have been tried as risk factors of CAT, with low success. In support, hypercoagulant plasma profiles in patients with CAT differ from those with only VTE, indicating other risk factors that contribute to VTE in cancer. As germline mutations do not significantly contribute to elevated risk of VTE, somatic mutations in tumors may significantly associate with and contribute to CAT. As it is very time-consuming to investigate each and every mutation, an unbiased approach is warranted. In this light we discuss our own recent unbiased proof-of-principle study using RNA sequencing in isolated colorectal cancer cells. Our work has uncovered candidate genes that associate with VTE in colorectal cancer, and these gene profiles associated with VTE more significantly than classical parameters such as platelet counts, D-dimer, and P-selectin levels. Genes associated with VTE could be linked to pathways being involved in coagulation, inflammation and methionine degradation. We conclude that tumor cell-specific gene expression profiles and/or mutational status has superior potential as predictors of VTE in cancer patients.

Polymorphisms of the coagulation system and risk of cancer

Hypercoagulability is a frequently finding in patients with cancer, and is associated with an increased risk of venous thrombosis (VT). Cancer-associated VT is associated with poor prognosis and represents the leading non-cancer cause of death among these patients. Conversely, patients experiencing VT are at increased risk of subsequent cancer, suggesting an epidemiological bidirectional link between cancer and hemostasis, and indicating a role of the hemostatic system in cancer development. How the coagulation system relates to cancer etiology at the genetic level is largely unexplored. Data on the association of polymorphisms in genes involved in coagulation with cancer development is important to clarify the role of the coagulation system in cancer pathogenesis. Effects of coagulation-related gene polymorphisms on cancer risk may possibly be translated into novel treatment- and prevention strategies of cancer-associated thrombosis and the cancer itself. This article reviews the current knowledge of the relation between polymorphisms in genes involved in coagulation and cancer risk in solid tumors.

Joint effects of cancer and variants in the factor 5 gene on the risk of venous thromboembolism

Venous thromboembolism occurs frequently in cancer patients. Two variants in the factor 5 gene (F5), rs6025 encoding for the factor V Leiden mutation R506Q, and rs4524 encoding K858R, have been found to be associated with venous thromboembolism. We assessed the joint effect of active cancer and these two F5 variants on venous thromboembolism risk in a case-cohort study. Cases with a first venous thromboembolism (n=609) and a randomly selected age-weighted cohort (n=1,691) were sampled from the general population in Tromsø, Norway. Venous thromboembolism was classified as cancer-related if it occurred in the period 6 months before to 2 years after a diagnosis of cancer. Active cancer was associated with an 8.9-fold higher risk of venous thromboembolism (95% CI 7.2-10.9). The risk of cancer-related venous thromboembolism was 16.7-fold (95% CI 9.9-28.0) higher in subjects heterozygous for rs6025 compared with non-carriers of this variant without active cancer. In subjects with active cancer the risk of venous thromboembolism was 15.9-fold higher (95% CI 9.1-27.9) in those with one risk allele at rs4524, and 21.1-fold (95% CI 12.4-35.8) higher in those with two risk alleles compared with non-carriers without active cancer. A synergistic interaction was observed between active cancer and factor V Leiden (relative excess risk due to interaction 7.0; 95% CI 0.5-14.4) and rs4524 (relative excess risk due to interaction 15.0; 95% CI 7.5-29.2). The incidence of venous thromboembolism during the initial 6 months following a diagnosis of cancer was particularly high in subjects with risk alleles at these loci. This implies that the combination of cancer and F5 variants synergistically increases venous thromboembolism risk.

Characteristics and Risk Factors of Cancer Associated Venous Thromboembolism

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this study was to examine the differences in commonly associated characteristics and risk factors of venous thromboembolism (VTE) between patients with and without cancer in a VTE population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Uniform data were collected for patients with a diagnosis of VTE obtaining care at CDC funded Thrombosis Network Centers. Patient characteristics and risk factors were compared in VTE patients with and without cancer. Logistic regression was used to calculate the unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to assess patient characteristics and thrombotic risk factors more frequently identified among VTE patients with cancer compared to those without cancer.

RESULTS

Between August 2003 and April 2011, 3,115 adult patients with a diagnosis of VTE including 189 (6.1%) patients with active cancer participated in the multi-site thrombosis registry. VTE patients with cancer had a higher prevalence of PE and DVT in unusual sites compared to those without cancer. Thrombophilia was more common among VTE patients without cancer than those with cancer (25.1% vs 10.6%, p<0.001). In adjusted analysis, age group≥45years (OR =5.20, 95% CI, 3.30, 8.18), surgery (OR =1.86, 95% CI, 1.19, 2.91), and hypertension (OR =1.66, 95% CI, 1.15, 2.40) were the VTE risk factors more commonly found among VTE patients with cancer.

CONCLUSION

The study identified several thrombotic risk factors more likely to be found with cancer associated VTE, which may help to characterize at risk cancer patients and to develop prevention and management strategies in this population.

Thrombosis in multiple myeloma

Multiple myeloma, as with other malignancies, has been associated with the development of venous thromboembolic events. Chemotherapy or steroids in combination with antiangiogenic agents can further enhance this risk. The identification of measurable factors associated with this prothrombotic state could help in the selection of patients who need antithrombotic prophylaxis. Malignancy-associated thrombophilic state, paraprotein-specific mechanisms and treatment-induced changes can explain the high rate of thrombosis in this cancer population. While the release of inflammatory cytokines induces high levels of factor VIII, von Willebrand factor and downregulate the protein C system, elevated plasma immunoglobulin can impair fibrinolysis. Strategies of thromboprophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin, warfarin or aspirin in patients treated with thalidomide/chemotherapy or lenalidomide and dexamethasone have shown efficacy. Early data indicate that the effect of low molecular weight heparin on multiple myeloma is not confined to the anticoagulant effect but could extend to survival; a similar positive trend in overall survival has also been reported in patients treated with aspirin.

Is genetic screening necessary for determining the possibility of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients?

OBJECTIVE

To determine the risk of an association with some genetic polymorphisms involved in venous thromboembolism (VTE) gene variations (FVL, FV H1299R, FII G20210A, MTHFR C677T, MTHFR A1298C, PAI-1 4G/5G, β-fibrinogen -455 G → A, FXIII Val34Leu and GpIIIa HPA-1a) in cancer patients.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Among 78 cancer patients, 28 who had proven first episode of VTE were selected as the patient group, with 50 control samples selected from age-, sex- and body mass index-matched healthy volunteers (healthy group). The differences in frequency of genetic polymorphisms were found to be statistically insignificant between these two groups.

RESULTS

Logistic regression analysis after adjustment for age, sex, smoking and hypertension showed no difference. The screened mutations of these genes were not significantly associated with VTE risk.

CONCLUSION

There is no possible benefit from genetic screening tests regarding VTE in cancer patients.

Increased acquired activated protein C resistance in unselected patients with hematological malignancies

BACKGROUND

We have previously found that activation of coagulation in patients with various hematological malignancies was apparently not initiated by tissue factor (TF). Acquired activated protein C (APC) resistance may be another mechanism responsible for such hypercoagulation, and has been demonstrated in patients with solid tumors, but not in patients with hematological malignancy.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate acquired APC resistance in a hypercoagulable cohort of patients with hematological malignancies.

PATIENTS/METHODS

Blood samples from 93 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), chronic lymphatic leukemia, multiple myeloma, or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, were analyzed before start and after completion of cancer therapy. APC resistance was measured using calibrated automated thrombography. The APC sensitivity ratio (APC-SR) was calculated as the ratio of the endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) determined in plasma probed with either APC or buffer.

RESULTS

Untreated patients were found to have higher APC-SR than healthy controls, and patients with AML had higher APC-SR as compared to the other diagnoses, both findings being consistent with acquired APC resistance. The acquired APC resistance was partly ameliorated with cancer treatment. Decreased levels of protein S and TF pathway inhibitor were inversely correlated to APC resistance.

CONCLUSIONS

APC resistance may contribute to the hypercoagulable state in hematological malignancies.

Experimental melanoma metastasis in lungs of mice with congenital coagulation disorders

Experimental animal studies as well as clinical trials have shown that interventions targeting the blood coagulation cascade inhibit cancer cell metastasis. These data support the hypothesis that congenital prothrombotic disorders, like factor V Leiden, facilitate metastasis whereas bleeding disorders, like haemophilia impede metastasis. To test this hypothesis, we subjected factor V Leiden and factor VIII deficient mice to a murine model of experimental lung metastasis. In this model, B16F10 murine melanoma cells are injected into the tail vein resulting in multiple lung metastases within 20 days. Both hemi- and homozygous factor VIII deficient mice were protected against lung metastasis compared to wild-type littermate controls. In contrast, homozygous factor V Leiden mice developed more metastases than wild-type littermates, whereas heterozygous carriers showed an intermediate number of pulmonary foci. Overall, these data show that a congenital susceptibility to either bleeding or thrombosis modifies the metastatic capacity of cancer cells in the bloodstream and suggest that procoagulant phenotypes are a risk factor for tumour metastasis.

Thrombophilia and risk of venous thrombosis in patients with cancer

Venous thrombosis is a common and severe complication in patients with cancer. We reviewed studies assessing whether a state of acquired or congenital thrombophilia influenced the risk of thrombosis in patients with cancer. The results are equivocal. However, the majority of studies were of limited size. The influence of thrombophilia in patients with cancer may be more difficult to demonstrate than in the general population, the risk of thrombosis due to cancer per se possibly outweighing the contribution of thrombophilic factors. Moreover, the results may depend on the genetic background of the population, the type of cancer, the type of thrombosis, and the chemotherapeutic treatment. Nevertheless, it appears that factor V Leiden or G20210A prothrombin gene mutation increases the risk of venous thromboembolism about 2- to 4-fold, compared with patients with cancer without either of these mutations. Similar results were observed for the occurrence of central venous catheter-associated thrombosis. Antiphospholipid antibodies and acquired resistance to activated protein C were frequently observed in patients with cancer and appeared to favor the occurrence of thrombosis. The role of hyperhomocysteinemia deserves further investigation. Since the clinical implications of these findings remain to be clarified, routine screening of cancer patients for thrombophilia cannot yet be recommended on the basis of these studies. Studies designed to assess the value of thromboprophylaxis in high-risk patients, including thrombophilic patients, with long-term central venous catheters may be valuable.

Cancer and thrombosis: from molecular mechanisms to clinical presentations

Although the bidirectional association between cancer and venous thromboembolism (VTE) has been known for almost two centuries, recent advances in our understanding of the clinical, laboratory, and epidemiologic aspects of this association have created a renewed interest in this topic. This review consists of two parts. The first part discusses the occurrence, determinants and significance of VTE in those with cancer, as well as the risk of developing and the possible need to detect cancer in those presenting with VTE. The second part reviews the role of hemostatic constituents (coagulation and fibrinolytic proteins and platelets) in promoting growth and progression of cancer, as well as the effects and possible mechanisms of the low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) in this process.

Prevalence of Factor V 1691 G–A (Leiden) and prothrombin G20210A polymorphisms and the risk of venous thrombosis among cancer patients

AIMS

Cancer patients have an increased risk for thromboembolism (TE). Factor V 1691 G-A(Leiden) (FVL) and prothrombin (PT) G20210A mutation are common inherited risk factor for TE. The aim of the study is to evaluate the prevalence of FVL and PT G20210A polymorphism in cancer patients with and without TE as compared to patients with TE without malignancy and healthy control.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We have studied 43 cancer patients who developed TE during cancer treatment (group 1); 81 cancer patients without TE (group 2); 100 patients with TE without malignancy (group 3); 100 healthy control (group 4). FVL and PT G20210A polymorphisms were determined by the method of polymerase chain reaction-based DNA analysis.

RESULTS

The prevalence of FVL was significantly greater in cancer patients with TE (13 of 43, 30.2%) compared with other groups: 3.7% in group 2; 18% in group 3; 8% in group 4 (P < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in the prevalence of PT G20210A among the groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The study suggested that cancer patients with TE should be evaluated for FVL but PT G20210A was not contributing factor to the development of TE during cancer therapy.

Acquired resistance to activated protein C (aAPCR) in multiple myeloma is a transitory abnormality associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism

Acquired activated protein C resistance (aAPCR), not associated with factor V Leiden, has been described in cancer patients with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). APCR was determined in 1178 myeloma patients using an activated partial thromboplastin time-based resistance assay in the presence of excess of factor V-deficient plasma; polymerase chain reaction amplification of genomic DNA was used to detect factor V Leiden mutation. A total of 109 patients were found to have abnormal APCR and one-third of them were carriers for the mutation. With a median follow-up of 40 months, the presence of aAPCR was associated with a significantly increased risk of thrombosis (P < or = 0.001). APCR was measured again after treatment in 31 patients with abnormal baseline values and had normalised in 30 of them. This study indicates that aAPCR is the most common single transitory baseline coagulation abnormality associated with VTE in myeloma patients.

Factor V Leiden, prothrombin 20210A and the risk of venous thrombosis among cancer patients

Cancer patients have an increased risk of venous thrombosis (VT). The association of factor V Leiden (FVL) and the prothrombin 20210A variant with VT in cancer patients is not established. We genotyped 101 cancer patients with VT and 101 cancer patients without VT for these polymorphisms. Five cases and three controls were heterozygous for FVL, yielding an odds ratio of 1.7 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.3-10.7). Five cases and no controls were heterozygous for prothrombin 20210A, for an odds ratio of 6.7 (95% CI 0.9-infinity). Prothrombin 20210A may be associated with VT risk among cancer patients.

Thrombotic complications and thromboprophylaxis in breast and gynaecological malignancies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Thrombotic complications are a common cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with gynaecological or advanced breast malignancies. There are several manifestations of thromboembolism in these patients, but deep venous thrombosis of the legs is the usual presentation. This review highlights various manifestations of thrombotic complications in these malignancies, and also describes the current evidence base for various forms of thromboprophylaxis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several trials have suggested that low molecular weight heparin therapy is at least as effective as oral anticoagulation for secondary prophylaxis. It has also been suggested that low molecular weight heparin therapy may prolong survival in cancer patients, but this was not shown in the results of one recently published placebo-controlled randomized trial.

SUMMARY

Primary thromboprophylaxis in cancer should be individualized and considered according to the risk category of each patient. Low molecular weight heparin therapy can be used for secondary thromboprophylaxis in patients with breast or gynaecological malignancy. However, more studies are needed to substantiate their acceptance in cancer patients.

Venous thromboembolism and cancer: risks and outcomes

Cancer and its treatments are well-recognized risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Evidence suggests that the absolute risk depends on the tumor type, the stage or extent of the cancer, and treatment with antineoplastic agents. Furthermore, age, surgery, immobilization, and other comorbid features will also influence the overall likelihood of thrombotic complications, as they do in patients without cancer. The role of hereditary thrombophilia in patients with cancer and thrombosis is still unclear, and screening for this condition in cancer patients is not indicated. The most common malignancies associated with thrombosis are those of the breast, colon, and lung, reflecting the prevalence of these malignancies in the general population. When adjusted for disease prevalence, the cancers most strongly associated with thrombotic complications are those of the pancreas, ovary, and brain. Idiopathic thrombosis can be the first manifestation of an occult malignancy. However, intensive screening for cancer in patients with VTE often does not improve survival and is not generally warranted. Independently of the timing of cancer diagnosis (before or after the VTE), the life expectancy of cancer patients with VTE is relatively short, because of both deaths from recurrent VTE and the cancer itself. Patients with cancer and acute VTE who take anticoagulants for an extended period are at increased risk of recurrent VTE and bleeding. A recent randomized trial, the Randomized Comparison of Low Molecular Weight Heparin versus Oral Anticoagulant Therapy for Long-Term Anticoagulation in Cancer Patients with Venous Thromboembolism (CLOT) study, showed that low molecular weight heparin may be a better treatment option for this group of patients. The antineoplastic effects of anticoagulants are being actively investigated with promising preliminary results.

Clinical and laboratory evaluation of thrombophilia

Thrombophilia is the predisposition to venous thromboembolism and is caused by inherited and acquired factors, alone or in combination. With the discovery of APC resistance and the prothrombin gene mutation, more than half of all patients with clinical characteristics of thrombophilia are now diagnosed with an inherited disorder. The hypercoagulable work-up of patients with venous thromboembolism is important, because the causes can influence the duration and management of anticoagulation therapy, as well as affect other decisions regarding life and health issues.

Prevalence of factor V Leiden, FII G20210A, FXIII Val34Leu and MTHFR C677T polymorphisms in cancer patients with and without venous thrombosis

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common complication in patients with malignant disease. In addition to well-established acquired risk factors for VTE, several genetic risk factors, mainly related to the haemostatic system, are known to influence thrombotic risk. However, the contribution of gene abnormalities to thrombotic tendency in cancer patients remains poorly explored. We performed a prospective study to evaluate the prevalence and clinical significance of four gene variations (factor V Leiden [FVL], factor II G20210A, factor XIII Val34Leu and MTHFR C677T) in cancer patients, with and without VTE. Enrolled were 211 unrelated and unselected patients (M/F ratio 0.5, mean age 57 years, range 12-91 years) with a diagnosis of cancer, admitted to two University Oncology Clinics in the city of São Paulo, Southeastern Brazil. After admission, all patients were evaluated for the presence of symptoms and signs of VTE. Sixty-four patients (30.3%) had an episode of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE), which has been objectively verified; 147 patients (69.7%) had no evidence of VTE. FVL was found with a frequency of 1.5% and 2.7% in the VTE and non-VTE group, respectively (odds ratio [OR] for VTE 0.6, 95% CI: 0.06-5.3). FII G20210A was found in 1.5% and 1.3% of thrombotic and nonthrombotic patients, respectively, yielding an OR of 1.2 (95% CI: 0.1-13.1). FXIII Val34Leu was detected in 29.6% of the thrombotic patients and in 28.5% of the non-thrombotic patients (OR 1.1, 95% CI: 0.5-2). MTHFR 677T was present in 53.1% and 60.5% of patients with and without thrombosis, respectively (OR 0.8, 95% CI: 0.4-1.4). The present data do not point to an association between the four polymorphisms here investigated and the risk of VTE in cancer patients.

Factor V Leiden mutation carriership and venous thromboembolism in polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia

Polycythemia Vera (PV) and Essential Thrombocythemia (ET) are chronic myeloproliferative disorders complicated by a high incidence of thrombotic complications. Extensive coagulation studies failed to demonstrate a consistent pattern of abnormalities associated with thrombosis. Recently, a poor anticoagulant response to activated protein C (APC), due to a mutation of factor V (FV Leiden), has been identified as the most frequent hereditary disorder associated with venous thrombophilia. We investigated in 304 patients with PV and ET whether the presence of FV Leiden could be a risk factor for thrombosis. FV Leiden was found in 14/304 patients (4.6%) and was associated with venous thromboembolism (VTE) occurred before and at diagnosis (5/27,16%, with a significant difference of prevalence in comparison of that observed in asymptomatic patients, 9/263, 3%, p = 0.003). Carriership of FV Leiden was associated with VTE relapse, with a prevalence of 3.6% in asymptomatic patients, 6.9% in patients with a single episode of VTE and 18.1% in patients with recurrent VTE. The prevalence of FV Leiden in patients with and without arterial thrombosis was similar (5/79, 6% and 9/211, 4%, respectively, p = 0.337). This study indicates that the prevalence of the FV Leiden mutation in patients with PV and ET is comparable with that observed in the general population. FV Leiden mutation is a risk factor for VTE before and at time of diagnosis and for VTE recurrences. Screening for FV Leiden may be considered to identify PV and ET patients at higher risk of recurrences.

Activated protein C resistance in the absence of factor V Leiden mutation is a common finding in multiple myeloma and is associated with an increased risk of thrombotic complications

Thromboembolism is not uncommon in multiple myeloma (MM) patients on treatment, but its pathogenesis remains poorly understood. We report the results of a prospective randomized trial of 62 newly diagnosed MM patients tested at baseline for hypercoagulability and treated with intensive chemotherapy with or without thalidomide in a randomized fashion. During the induction phase, 12 patients (19%) developed evidence of deep venous thrombosis (DVT), which was significantly more common in the thalidomide arm (36%) than in the control group (3%) (P = 0.001). Fourteen patients (23%) were found to have a baseline-reduced response to activated protein C (APC) in the absence of factor V Leiden mutation. Using a Kaplan-Meier analysis, a significantly higher proportion of patients with APC resistance developed DVT (5/14 versus 7/38; P = 0.04) irrespective of thalidomide administration. The risk of DVT was highest (50%) in patients with APC resistance on thalidomide. None of the patients with normal APC response and not receiving thalidomide developed DVT. In conclusion, in this series, acquired APC resistance was present in almost one-quarter of newly diagnosed myeloma patients and significantly increased the risk of DVT.

Acquired activated protein C resistance is common in cancer patients and is associated with venous thromboembolism

PURPOSE

Cancer patients have an increased risk for venous thromboembolism. Because activated protein C resistance is a common risk factor for venous thromboembolism, we prospectively evaluated the activated protein C sensitivity ratio and factor V Leiden mutation in cancer patients with and without venous thromboembolism.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

We studied 55 consecutive cancer patients with deep vein thrombosis, 58 cancer patients with no history of venous thromboembolism, 54 patients with venous thromboembolism without malignancy, and 56 healthy controls. The presence of factor V Leiden mutation was determined by polymerase chain reaction and allele specific restriction digestion. The activated protein C sensitivity ratio was expressed as the ratio of activated partial thromboplastin times measured in the presence and absence of activated protein C; a ratio <2.0 in patients who did not have factor V Leiden was considered to indicate acquired activated protein C resistance.

RESULTS

The prevalence of factor V Leiden mutation in cancer patients with thromboembolism (1 of 55, 2%) did not differ significantly from those in cancer patients without thromboembolism (4 of 58, 7%) or normal controls (2 of 56, 4%), but was significantly lower than that of patients with thromboembolism without cancer (18 of 54, 33%, P <0.001). The prevalence of acquired activated protein C resistance was significantly greater in cancer patients with thromboembolism (29 of 54, 54%, P = 0.001) compared with the other groups: 9 of 54 (17%) in cancer patients without thromboembolism, 7 of 36 (19%) in patients with thromboembolism without cancer, and none of the normal controls.

CONCLUSION

Although factor V Leiden is not a major risk factor for thrombosis in cancer patients, acquired activated protein C resistance is common and may contribute to the thrombotic tendency in these patients.

Arg506Gln mutation of the coagulation factor V gene not detected in Japanese pulmonary thromboembolism

The incidence of pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) is lower in Japanese than in Caucasians. The basis for the different incidence has not been clarified. A poor anticoagulant response to activated protein C based on a single point mutation of the factor V gene (Arg506Gln) was found to be a pathogenetic factor for venous thrombosis and PTE in North America and Europe. We investigated whether the Arg506Gln mutation of factor V is responsible for the occurrence of PTE among Japanese. We analyzed genomic DNA prepared from fresh peripheral blood of 25 patients with PTE of unknown etiology (12 of acute type and 13 of chronic type) and that of 110 controls without respiratory or circulatory disorders. To detect the Arg506Gln mutation, 267 bp DNA fragments of the factor V gene including the Arg506Gln region were amplified by PCR, digested by MnlI and electrophoresed. After digestion of PCR products with MnlI, DNA fragments of 163 bp length, but not DNA fragments of 200 bp length, were identified in all samples, indicating the absence of the Arg506Gln mutation in the patients with PTE and control subjects. These results suggest that the Arg506Gln mutation is absent or very rare and not an important pathogenetic factor for PTE in Japanese.

Venous thrombosis in older people: prevalence of the factor V gene mutation Q506

OBJECTIVES

Old age is usually considered to be a risk factor for venous thromboembolism, in conjunction with other factors such as heart failure, major surgery, cancer, long-term immobilization, and antiphospholipid antibodies. Genetic risk factors, especially inherited deficiencies in coagulation inhibitors, also play a role in the pathogenesis of thrombosis, but these are usually diagnosed in thrombophilic patients before the age of 50. The factor V Q506 mutation, responsible for activated protein C resistance, was recently linked to thromboembolic disease. We therefore investigated the prevalence of biological risk factors in older hospital patients with venous thromboembolism.

DESIGN

A 2-year study period.

SETTING

Ivry sur Seine (Paris), France.

PARTICIPANTS

Seventy-nine geriatric patients (60 women and 19 men, mean age 83+/-6.8 years, range 70-102 years) who had had at least one proven episode of venous thromboembolism were enrolled over a 2-year period.

MEASUREMENTS

Lupus anticoagulant and antithrombin (AT), protein C (PC), and protein S (PS) levels were determined in plasma. The factor V Q506 mutation was detected on genomic DNA.

RESULTS

Lupus anticoagulant was detected in two women, one of whom also had a high level of anticardiolipin IgG, leading to the diagnosis of an antiphospholipid syndrome. No hereditary deficiency in AT, PC, or PS was found, but one patient had an acquired AT deficiency. Interestingly, nine of the 79 patients (11.4%, six women and three men) were heterozygous for the factor V Q506 mutation, although none were homozygous. The only major risk factor for thrombosis identified in these patients was prolonged immobilization in four cases. Four of the nine patients who were heterozygous for the factor V Q506 mutation had recurrent thromboembolism, and two of these patients had been immobilized for long periods.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms that hereditary deficiencies in coagulation inhibitors, and the lupus anticoagulant, are rarely involved in the pathogenesis of venous thromboembolism in older subjects. In contrast, the factor V Q506 mutation was frequently associated with thrombosis (11.4% of our patients) and should, therefore, be considered an important risk factor in the older people.

The role of activated protein C resistance in the pathogenesis of venous thrombosis

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is the third most common cardiovascular disease in the United States. VTE is usually a consequence of either acquired or inherited alterations in hemostatic regulatory proteins. These regulatory proteins are predominantly those of the protein C/protein S natural anticoagulant pathway. Acquired deficiencies in this pathway are frequently a consequence of other clinical entities (eg, cancer, AIDS, and diabetes), while inherited deficiencies can be responsible for venous thrombosis in an otherwise healthy individual. The purpose of this article is to briefly describe the pathobiology of the anticoagulant protein system and to review the clinical implications of activated protein C resistance.