Update on the metabolic effects of steroidal contraceptives and their relationship to cardiovascular disease risk

Hormonal Contraception and Risk of Cardiometabolic Disease in Women with HIV

Objective: We sought to determine the association of hormonal contraception (HC) and cardiometabolic outcomes among women with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Methods: We included women with HIV aged 18-45 years in clinical care in the Southeastern United States between 1998 and 2018. Oral and injectable HC use was captured from medication records. Our outcomes included incident cardiovascular/thrombotic disease (CVD) (atherosclerosis, hypertension, cerebrovascular disease, thrombosis, and heart failure) and incident metabolic disorders (diabetes, dyslipidemia, obesity, and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis). We excluded women with prevalent conditions. We used multivariable marginal structural models to examine time-varying current and cumulative HC use and cardiometabolic outcomes in separate analyses, adjusting for age, race, smoking, time-varying comorbidities, CD4 cell count, HIV RNA, and antiretroviral use. Women with HC exposure were compared with women without HC exposure. Results: Among the 710 women included, 201 women (28%) used HC. CVD analyses included 603 women without prevalent CVD and 93 incident events; metabolic analyses included 365 women without prevalent metabolic disease and 150 incident events. Current and cumulative oral HC use was associated with increased odds of CVD, though this was not statistically significant (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.08, [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.80-5.43] and aOR = 1.24 [95% CI: 0.96-1.60] per year of use, respectively). Oral HC was not associated with risk of incident metabolic disorders. Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) was not associated with risk of incident CVD. Current and cumulative DMPA use was significantly associated with decreased odds of incident metabolic disorders (aOR = 0.48 [95% CI: 0.23, 1.00] and aOR = 0.65 [95% CI: 0.42-1.00] per year of use, respectively). Conclusion: Our results suggest that cardiovascular risk should be considered when selecting contraception for women with HIV.

Hormonal contraception and metabolic outcomes in women with or at risk for HIV infection

OBJECTIVE

The use of hormonal contraception (HC) is increasing in HIV-infected women. Both HC and HIV infection have been associated with adverse metabolic outcomes. We investigated the association of progestin-only and combined (estrogen/progestin) HC with disorders of glucose and lipid metabolism in HIV-infected and uninfected women.

METHODS

Linear mixed models evaluated the association of HC type with fasting high density lipoprotein, low density lipoprotein, triglycerides, the homeostasis model assessment estimate of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), and glucose in 885 HIV-infected and 408 HIV-uninfected women from the Women's Interagency HIV Study seen between October 2000 and September 2005.

RESULTS

Compared with non-HC users, progestin-only HC was independently associated with lower HDL [-3 mg/dL; 95% confidence interval (CI) -5, -1 in HIV-infected and -6 mg/dL; 95% CI: -9, -3 in HIV-uninfected women] and greater HOMA-IR (+0.86; 95% CI: 0.51-1.22 and +0.56; 95% CI: 0.12-1.01). Combined HC was associated with higher HDL (+5 mg/dL; 95% CI: 2-7 and +5 mg/dL; 95% CI: 3-7).

CONCLUSIONS

HIV-infected women using progestin-only HC have lower HDL and greater HOMA-IR than HIV-infected non-HC users. Combined HC may be preferred in HIV-infected women of reproductive age at risk for cardiovascular disease, but interactions with antiretroviral therapy that may impair contraceptive efficacy have been reported. Alternative HC methods that minimize adverse outcomes but maintain efficacy require further study.

Hormonal contraception and HIV-positive women: metabolic concerns and management strategies

As HIV-positive women live longer lives, and as testing for HIV becomes more routine, clinicians can expect to see more HIV-positive women in their practices. The need to be aware of management issues particular to this population becomes increasingly important. Metabolic dysregulation is a common, long-term complication associated with HIV and is one of the most difficult to manage. Hormonal contraception also is associated with metabolic dysregulation. As more HIV-positive women choose long-term, reversible contraception, the potential for concomitant and additive side effects, and the need for careful, proactive management strategies to avoid these complications, will become more important. This article reviews research detailing the metabolic dysfunction associated with hormonal contraception and with HIV-seropositivity. It highlights reasons for concern regarding the potential, although as yet theoretical, increased risk for metabolic dysfunction when hormonal contraception is used in the presence of HIV. Suggestions for management strategies for women living with HIV who choose to use hormonal contraception are presented. These strategies should be viewed as suggestions for management until substantitive research becomes available.

Drug delivery systems for oestrogenic hormones and antagonists: the need for selective targeting in estradiol-dependent cancers

The pleiotropic activity of oestrogens and their mechanism of action via their binding to the two oestrogen receptors alpha (ER alpha) and beta (ER beta) subtypes in the different tissues where oestrogens exert their action have been briefly described. The fate of these compounds trapped into different galenic forms is discussed with regard to their therapeutic applications. Firstly, the advantages and disadvantages of the different forms (pills, i.v. forms and transdermal patches) used in contraception are compared. Secondly, the therapeutic use of formulated oestrogens for the post-menopausal hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is analysed through the various results obtained in different trials. The link between HRT and the risks of breast cancer and cardiovascular disease is underlined. Finally, comparing the activity of selective oestrogen receptor modulators such as tamoxifen and pure anti-oestrogens such as RU58668 and ICI182780, we analysed the reasons leading to the need for a tumor targeting of the latters, but not of the former for the treatment of oestrogen-dependent breast cancer. Different injectable and biodegradable formulations, that lead to a remarkable anti-tumor efficiency in xenografts, have been recently developed and we believe that they may represent promising new administration ways of added therapeutic values for anti-oestrogens. Such devices could be extended to the delivery of other anti-cancer drugs with more aggressive activities than anti-oestrogens.

Sex hormones, insulin sensitivity, and diabetes mellitus

Sex differences and the role of gonadal hormones in modulating insulin sensitivity and glucose tolerance are of increasing interest and importance because of the increasing prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus and the metabolic abnormalities associated with aging. Body composition is closely associated with insulin sensitivity, and increased body fat, particularly in the visceral compartment, is a risk factor for developing type 2 diabetes mellitus. Sex differences in body composition and/or insulin sensitivity are evident in humans throughout the lifespan. Ovarian hormones influence insulin sensitivity across the menstrual cycle, during pregnancy, and in the menopausal transition. Similarly, estrogens and progestins used for contraception and hormone replacement therapy affect glucoregulation. Nonhuman primates and humans have similar life histories and reproductive characteristics. As a result, nonhuman primates provide a valuable model for investigating factors related to insulin sensitivity. Studies of nonhuman primates have contributed significantly to our understanding of sex differences and the influence of sex steroids in this context. This brief review surveys present knowledge of the sex differences in body composition, insulin sensitivity, and risk for development of type 2 diabetes mellitus derived from studies in humans and nonhuman primates. The influences of endogenous and exogenous gonadal steroids are emphasized.

A randomized study on the influence of oral contraceptives containing ethinylestradiol combined with drospirenone or desogestrel on lipid and lipoprotein metabolism over a period of 13 cycles

In this open-label, randomized study we compared the influence of a new oral contraceptive containing 30 microg ethinylestradiol and 3 mg drospirenone (EE + DRSP = Yasmin), with a reference preparation containing 30 microg ethinylestradiol and 150 microg desogestrel (EE + DSG = Marvelon) on the lipid profile. The primary target variables were total high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, HDL2 cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. These and additional lipid and lipoprotein fractions were measured at baseline and in the 3rd, 6th and 13th treatment cycles in a total of 50 volunteers, and also assessed after density gradient ultracentrifugation. A slight increase in mean total HDL cholesterol vs. baseline was found for the DRSP group (+12.8%) and the DSG group (+11.8%) after 13 treatment cycles. HDL2 cholesterol did not change remarkably in both groups. The mean LDL cholesterol values increased by 10.6% vs. baseline in the DSG group and remained nearly stable in the DRSP group (+1.8%). All measured values remained within the reference ranges. No statistically significant differences were found between the two treatment groups for those primary endpoints. A slight rise in mean total cholesterol was found for all cycles after the initiation of treatment. The mean increase after 1 year of treatment was approximately 8% in both treatment groups. Mean triglyceride levels increased for both treatment groups without leaving the reference range. The increase for total triglycerides was +73.6 % in the DRSP group and +61.3% in DSG group. For total phospholipids, an increase of +13.6% (DRSP) and +18.5% (DSG) over 13 cycles was measured. The apolipoproteins Apo A-I, Apo A-II and Apo B increased slightly more during DRSP treatment than during DSG treatment. The reduction of Apo E was similar in both groups. Lipoprotein (a) remained stable in the DRSP group, whereas it increased by +10.8% in the DSG group. In conclusion, the combined low-dose oral contraceptive Yasmin, with 30 microg ethinylestradiol and 3 mg of the novel progestogen drospirenone, as well as the reference preparation, had little impact on the lipid profile. While both preparations displayed a favorable lipid profile with increased total HDL cholesterol, the antiandrogenic or missing androgenic activity of Yasmin may be regarded as responsible for the stable LDL cholesterol levels. As a result, the ratio of total HDL:LDL was increased, a pattern that is usually considered clinically beneficial with respect to cardiovascular disease risk.

Safety concerns and health benefits associated with oral contraception

Since the introduction of hormonal contraceptives in the 1960s, there have been a variety of both health benefits and safety concerns attributed to their use. In most instances, the noncontraceptive benefits of oral contraceptives (OCs) outweigh the potential cardiovascular risks. In fact, the probability of a patient experiencing a cardiovascular event while taking a low-dose OC is very low. However, smoking, hypertension, obesity, and diabetes are risk factors that must be taken into account when prescribing OCs. The neoplastic effects of hormonal contraceptives have been extensively studied, and recent meta-analyses indicate that there is a reduction in the risk of endometrial and ovarian cancer, a possible small increase in the risk for breast and cervical cancer, and an increased risk of liver cancer. Finally, many women will experience noncontraceptive health benefits with OCs that expand far beyond pregnancy prevention. Some of these benefits include reduction in menstrual-related symptoms, fewer ectopic pregnancies, a possible increase in bone density, and possible protection against pelvic inflammatory disease.

Ovarian function during and after treatment with the new progestagen Org 30659

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate ovarian function during 21 days of oral administration of different doses of Org 30659, a novel selective progestagenic steroid.

DESIGN

Randomized, double-blind, dose-finding study.

SETTINGS

Three centers in Austria, Sweden, and the United Kingdom.

PARTICIPANTS

Eighty-one healthy women 19-40 years of age with regular ovulatory cycles.

INTERVENTION

Daily oral administration of 0.060, 0.120, 0.180, or 0.240 mg of Org 30659, or 0.075 mg desogestrel (reference group), for 21 days.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Once-daily measurements of follicular diameter and 17-beta estradiol, progesterone, FSH, and LH levels.

RESULT(S)

Daily treatment with Org 30659 for 21 days caused dose-dependent suppression of ovarian activity. No ovulation was observed in any study group. On average, ovulation returned 16.5 to 22.1 days after treatment. The effects of desogestrel, 0.075 mg, were similar to those of 0.060 and 0.120 mg of Org 30659. All doses were well tolerated, as shown by the type of side effects that occurred, the absence of an effect on physical and laboratory findings, and the low rate of study discontinuation.

CONCLUSION(S)

Daily oral administration of 0.060-0.240 mg of Org 30659 suppresses ovarian function to a level sufficient to inhibit ovulation. This effect is dose-dependent, and the suppressive effect is readily reversible at all doses tested. Org 30659 can thus be safely administered orally for 21 days to healthy female volunteers in a dosage of 0.060 mg/d to 0.240 mg/d.

Apolipoproteins E and C-III in apo B- and non-apo B-containing lipoproteins in middle-aged women from the Stanislas cohort: effect of oral contraceptive use and common apolipoprotein E polymorphism

Oral contraceptive (OC) use and common apo E polymorphism are well known to modify serum lipid and lipoprotein concentrations. The combined effect of OC use and apo E genotype on the concentration of apo E or apo C-III in apo B- (apo E-LpB or apo C-III-LpB) or in non-apo B-containing lipoparticles (apo E-Lp-non-B or apo C-III-Lp-non-B) are unknown. Our study comprised 613 women, aged 30-45 years, genotyped for common apo E polymorphism and who differed in their combined low-dose OC consumption. The concentrations of apo C-III, apo C-III-LpB and apo C-III-Lp-non-B were significantly higher in OC users than in non-users by 13, 23 and 8% respectively, without significant interaction with the apo E genotype. The concentrations of apo E and apo E-Lp-non-B were significantly lower (differences being -14% and -31% respectively) in OC users than in controls whereas the apo E-LpB concentration was significantly higher (+19%), resulting in a redistribution of apo E from Lp-non-B towards LpB. Total apo E and apo E-Lp-non-B concentrations were higher in subjects carrying the epsilon2 allele and lower in those with the epsilon4 allele when compared to epsilon3/epsilon3 subjects (P < 0.001). The opposite held for the apo E- LpB concentration (P < 0.05). The main finding is the significant interaction between apo E genotype and OC use (P < 0.01) on apo E-Lp-non-B concentration, the epsilon4 carriers showing the smallest differences between OC users and non-users in comparison with the epsilon2 or epsilon3/epsilon3 carriers. These results suggest that the common apo E polymorphism can modulate the OC use effect.

The long term health consequences of polycystic ovary syndrome

Women with polycystic ovary syndrome have both insulin resistance and beta cell dysfunction. Consequently, they are at increased risk of developing diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Women with polycystic ovary syndrome present to clinicians at a young age and as such offer a unique opportunity to identify insulin resistant patients at an early stage. This enables the modification of risk factors and diagnosis of diabetes before the onset of macro- and micro-vascular symptoms. Increased emphasis should thus be placed on long term risk management and diabetic screening with advice on smoking, exercise and, if appropriate, weight loss. Where possible drugs that exacerbate insulin resistance should be avoided and consideration should be given to the use of insulin sensitising agents, particularly in the obese.

Occlusive vascular diseases in oral contraceptive users. Epidemiology, pathology and mechanisms

Despite being an unprecedented departure from normal physiology, the combined oral contraceptive is not only highly effective, but it also has a remarkably good safety record. Concerns over safety persist, though, particularly with regard to venous thromboembolism (VTE), stroke and myocardial infarction (MI). Epidemiological studies consistently show an increase in risk of VTE, but the results are more contentious with regard to arterial diseases. Despite 40 years of research, the mechanisms behind these adverse effects are not understood. In this review, we integrate information from published studies of the epidemiology and pathology of the occlusive vascular diseases and their risk factors to identify likely explanations for pathogenesis in oral contraceptive users. Oral contraceptives induce both prothrombotic and fibrinolytic changes in haemostatic factors and an imbalance in haemostasis is likely to be important in oral contraceptive-induced VTE. The complexity of the changes involved and the difficulty of ascribing clinical significance has meant that uncertainty persists. A seriously under-researched area concerns vascular changes in oral contraceptive users. Histologically, endothelial and intimal proliferation have been identified in women exposed to high plasma estrogen concentrations and these lesions are associated with thrombotic occlusion. Other structural changes may result in increased vascular permeability, loss of vascular tone and venous stasis. With regard to arterial disease risk, epidemiological information relating to dose effects and joint effects with other risk factors, and studies of pathology and changes in risk factors, suggests that oral contraceptive use per se does not cause arterial disease. It can, nevertheless, synergise very powerfully with subclinical endothelial damage to promote arterial occlusion. Accordingly, the prothrombotic effects of the oral contraceptive estrogen intervene in a cycle of endothelial damage and repair which would otherwise remain clinically silent or would ultimately progress - in, for example, the presence of cigarette smoking or hypertension - to atherosclerosis. Future work in this area should focus on modification of the effects of established risk factors by oral contraceptive use rather than modification of the supposed risk of oral contraceptive use by established risk factors. Attempts to understand vascular occlusion in oral contraceptive users in terms of the general features of VTE or with reference to atherosclerosis may be limiting, and future work needs to acknowledge that such occlusions may have unique features. Unequivocal identification of the mechanisms involved would contribute considerably to the alleviation of fears over vascular disease and to the development of even safer formulations.

Metabolic and fibrinolytic response to changed insulin sensitivity in users of oral contraceptives

The fundamental role of insulin resistance for metabolic changes linked to cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes is increasingly recognized. Oral contraceptives (OC) may affect insulin sensitivity, and a detailed characterization hereof, as well as the secondary effects on related metabolic systems, are relevant in the evaluation of the risk of developing vascular disorders or diabetes in OC users. We studied insulin sensitivity index (S(I)), glucose effectiveness (S(g)), and insulin response in young, healthy women by frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance tests before and after randomization to 6 months of treatment with ethinyl estradiol in triphasic combination with norgestimate (n = 17) or gestodene (n = 20). Measurements of fasting triglycerides and antigen concentrations of tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA) and plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1) were also included. Both compounds increased fasting plasma insulin and reduced S(i) but did not affect S(g). The relationships between S(i) and insulin response were unchanged. No consistent correlation between insulin sensitivity and triglycerides, t-PA, or PAI-1 were demonstrated before or during treatment. We conclude that the treatments were followed by a compensated decrease in insulin sensitivity that was unrelated to changes in triglycerides, t-PA, or PAI-1 antigen.

A prospective study of pregravid oral contraceptive use and risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy

Oral contraceptive use is associated with hypertension, dyslipidemias, and insulin resistance, all of which also characterize hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. In this prospective cohort study, the association of oral contraceptive use before pregnancy and the risk of gestational hypertension and preeclampsia was assessed. Between 1991 and 1995, 3973 nulliparous women who reported their first pregnancy lasting > or = 6 months were studied. Pregravid exposures were collected by biennial mailed questionnaires, and cases were confirmed by medical record review. Recent oral contraceptive use was defined as use within 2 years of pregnancy. Proportional hazards analysis was used to adjust for potential confounding variables. During the 4 years of follow-up, 133 (3.3%) women with gestational hypertension and 62 (1.6%) with preeclampsia were identified. Twenty-five percent of women who did not develop these disorders were recent users of oral contraceptives, compared with 19% (p = 0.11) of women who developed gestational hypertension and 30% (p = 0.38) who developed preeclampsia. Mean duration of prior oral contraceptive use was similar for cases and noncases. Compared with never and past users, the multivariate relative risk among recent users for developing gestational hypertension was 0.7 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.4-1.0) and for preeclampsia was 1.3 (95% CI, 0.8-2.4). Among recent users who had used oral contraceptives for > or = 8 years, the relative risk for gestational hypertension was 0.6 (95% CI, 0.3-1.2) and for preeclampsia was 2.1 (95% CI, 1.1-4.2). When the analysis was restricted to women who had never smoked, the risk for gestational hypertension was 0.2 (95% CI, 0.1-0.9) and for preeclampsia was 4.1 (95% CI, 1.9-8.7). Thus, recent use of oral contraceptives was associated with a reduced risk for developing gestational hypertension. In contrast, there was a suggestion that recent use was associated with an increased risk of developing preeclampsia, but only among women who had used these agents for > or = 8 years.

Effect of two oral contraceptives containing ethinyl estradiol and gestodene or norgestimate on different lipid and lipoprotein parameters

The effect of a triphasic oral contraceptive containing ethinyl estradiol and gestodene (EE/GSD) on various lipid and lipoprotein parameters was compared with that of a monophasic formulation containing 35 micrograms ethinyl estradiol and 250 micrograms norgestimate (EE/NGM). Blood samples were collected from 46 women on days 2, 11, and 21 of the preceding control cycle and of the third, sixth, and twelfth treatment cycles. There was no significant difference between formulations with regard to the influence on any measured parameter. As compared with controls, a significant increase was observed in the plasma levels of total triglycerides (24-78%), total phospholipids (7-20%), very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) triglycerides (61-76%), VLDL-phospholipids (14-60%), low density lipoprotein (LDL) triglycerides (8-35%), LDL-phospholipids (28-30%), high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (8-16%), HDL 3-cholesterol (11-20%), HDL-triglycerides (17-66%), HDL-phospholipids, HDL 3-phospholipids (7-11%), apolipoprotein (apo) A-I (5-20%) and apo A-II (10-40%) during treatment with both formulations. In contrast, the LDL-cholesterol levels were significantly decreased. These changes in lipid metabolism appear to reflect a predominance of the effect of the estrogen component. The results indicate that both low dose oral contraceptives containing different progestins and different amounts of EE do not exert a deleterious effect on lipoprotein metabolism, as high HDL-cholesterol and low LDL-cholesterol levels are known as low risk factors of cardiovascular disease. In contrast to endogenous hypertriglyceridemia, an EE-induced rise in triglyceride levels does not appear to increase cardiovascular risk if LDL is not increased.

Effects of oral contraceptives on free fatty acid metabolism in women

These studies examined whether women using oral contraceptives have abnormalities in free fatty acid (FFA) metabolism compared with women not using oral contraceptives. Plasma palmitate kinetics ([3H]palmitate) were measured at rest, following glucose ingestion, and during epinephrine infusion in 13 oral contraceptive users and 13 matched women not using oral contraceptives. Oral contraceptive users had significantly greater plasma triglyceride concentrations and glucose responses to oral glucose tolerance testing. No differences in basal (2.1 +/- 0.1 v 1.8 +/- 0.2 micromol x kg fat-free mass x FFM(-1) x min[-1]), glucose-suppressed (0.6 +/- 0.1 v 0.5 +/- 0.1 micromol x kg FFM(-1) x min[-1]), or epinephrine-stimulated (3.3 +/- 0.1 v 3.6 +/- 0.2 micromol x kg FFM(-1) x min[-1]) palmitate flux were detected between women using and not using oral contraceptives. The respiratory quotient (RQ) also was not different between groups. We conclude that the increase in plasma triglycerides and the mild glucose intolerance seen with oral contraceptive use is not associated with significant abnormalities of FFA metabolism.

The cardiovascular safety of triphasic contraceptive steroids

It was hypothesized that estrogen-induced cardioprotection is mediated by up-regulation and down-regulation of expression of nitric oxide (NO) and P-selectin, respectively. Published data on circulating levels of the vasodilator NO, atherogenic glycoprotein P-selectin, and lipoprotein-a [Lp(a)] in users of triphasic contraceptive steroids are lacking. A total of 30 healthy women (nonusers, controls) and 82 women using oral triphasic contraceptive steroids (ethinyl estradiol and levonorgestrel: Triovlar, Schering AG) for 18 to 24 cycles participated in this study. Fasting blood samples were obtained from users and nonusers for the determination of P-selectin and Lp(a) by enzyme immunoassay and NO by a colorimetric method. The serum Lp(a) levels in OC users were significantly higher than those of nonusers. On the other hand, the serum NO levels in OC users were significantly elevated when compared to nonusers. Plasma P-selectin was significantly lowered in OC users p < 0.005. These results demonstrate the beneficial effects of ethinyl estradiol in the triphasic contraceptive regimen. Ethinyl estradiol may afford a degree of anti-atherogenic-cardioprotective effect by up-regulation of the expression of the vasodilator NO and down-regulation of the expression of the atherogenic P-selectin. This may outweigh the cardiovascular risk of the increased atherogenic Lp(a). This study may explain the very low rate of mortality from venous thromboembolism in OC users, which compares favorably with the risks that many people accept in daily life.

Interaction of oral contraceptive use with the effects of age, exercise habits and other cardiovascular risk modifiers on metabolic risk markers

An analysis was undertaken to determine whether combined oral contraceptive (OC) use interacts with the effects of potential cardiovascular risk modifiers (age, body mass index, cigarette smoking, alcohol intake, exercise habit, family histories of heart disease or diabetes, number of pregnancies and duration of OC use) on blood pressure and lipid, lipoprotein, glucose and insulin risk markers for cardiovascular disease. Relationships between risk modifiers and risk markers were compared between non-users (n = 418) and users of low-estrogen dose OC (n = 925, categorised according to progestin content as monophasic levonorgestrel, triphasic levonorgestrel, norethindrone or desogestrel). OC use diminished the adverse effects of age on glucose tolerance. Aerobic exercise had a particularly beneficial effect on triglyceride levels and OGTT insulin response in OC users. The rise in HDL and HDL2 cholesterol concentrations with alcohol intake seen in non-users was diminished in OC users. Increasing duration of use of a desogestrel combination was associated with increasing HDL cholesterol concentrations. No adverse effects of risk modifiers on metabolic risk markers and blood pressure were augmented by OC use, and some were even diminished.

Relationships between blood pressure, oral contraceptive use and metabolic risk markers for cardiovascular disease

Data from a previous study, designed to compare metabolic risk markers for cardiovascular disease in non-users and oral contraceptive (OC) users, were analysed to evaluate the influence of OC composition on blood pressure. Healthy, female volunteers (1189 women) either not using OC (non-users) or currently using one of six different combined formulations (users) were compared. Combinations studied contained 30-40 micrograms ethinyl estradiol combined with the progestins levonorgestrel, norethindrone (at two and three different doses, respectively) or desogestrel. After statistical standardisation to account for the significantly greater age of the non-users and longer duration of OC use amongst the levonorgestrel combination users, mean blood pressure was higher, compared with non-users, in users of monophasic or triphasic levonorgestrel combinations (systolic: +4.3 mmHg (p < 0.001) and +2.7 mmHg (p < 0.001), respectively; diastolic: +2.6 mmHg (p < 0.001) and +2.3 mmHg (p < 0.05), respectively). Blood pressures in users of monophasic norethindrone and desogestrel combinations were not significantly raised and there was no increase in the proportion of women with abnormal values. Diastolic and systolic blood pressures were positively associated with oral glucose tolerance test insulin response (r = 0.11 (p < 0.01) and r = 0.15 (p < 0.001), respectively) in users but not in non-users. Currently used OC containing norethindrone or desogestrel progestins have little impact on blood pressure. Their correlated reduction in impact on insulin concentrations, though small, suggests common mechanisms through which OC affect blood pressure and insulin.