Emergency operations for nondiverticular perforation of the left colon

Risk Factors and Patterns of Recurrence in Stage III Perforated Colorectal Cancer: A Single-Center, Retrospective, Observational Study

BACKGROUND

Colorectal perforation generally results in a poor prognosis with a high mortality rate. Malignant colorectal perforation may result in cancer recurrence; however, the reason for higher recurrence rates in perforated than in nonperforated colorectal cancer is unclear. Therefore, we aimed to identify factors influencing stage III perforated colorectal cancer recurrence after a microscopically margin-negative resection (R0) surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This single-center, retrospective, observational study enrolled patients with stage III colorectal cancer who had undergone R0 surgery between 2007 and 2019. The clinicopathological characteristics and recurrence patterns of patients with perforated (n = 34) versus nonperforated tumors (n = 120) were compared.

RESULTS

The T4 disease proportion was significantly higher, and lymphatic invasion was more severe in the perforated group than in the nonperforated group. Significantly more dissected lymph nodes (n = 17) were observed in the nonperforated group than in the perforated group (n = 11). The rates of postoperative Clavien-Dindo III or higher complications and in-hospital mortality were significantly higher in the perforated group. Of the 23 and 96 patients who underwent long-term follow-up in the perforated and nonperforated groups, recurrence occurred in 14 (61%) and 34 patients (35%), respectively. The proportion of stage IIIC lesions was higher in the recurrence subset of the nonperforated group; however, clinicopathological characteristics did not differ significantly between the subsets of the perforated group.

CONCLUSIONS

The higher recurrence rate of stage III perforated colorectal cancer is likely due to higher T classification, lymphatic invasion, and increased lymph node metastases. Factors leading to perforation are likely related to advanced cancer stage.

Evaluation of Abdominal Emergencies

Early primary assessment and abdominal examination can often be enough to triage the patient with abdominal pain into those with less severe underlying pathologic condition from those with more acute findings. A focused history of the patient can then allow the clinician to develop their differential diagnosis. Once the differential diagnoses are determined, diagnostic imaging and laboratory findings can help confirm the diagnosis and allow for expeditious treatment and intervention.

Risk factors for the recurrence of stage II perforated colorectal cancer: A retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Patients with perforated colorectal cancer (PCRC) experience higher recurrence rates than those with non-perforated tissue. We identified the promoting factors of stage II PCRC recurrence after R0 surgery.

METHOD

This retrospective observational study included patients treated for colorectal cancer at a single facility between 2007 and 2016, and compared the clinicopathological features of patients with perforating versus non-perforating stage II tumors who underwent R0 resection, while focusing on recurrences.

RESULTS

Thirty-two and 112 patients (predominantly men) with perforating and non-perforating tumors, respectively, were included. The perforated group had significantly higher proportions of T4 tumors than the non-perforated group (44% vs. 15%). The perforated group had significantly lower numbers of resected lymph nodes than the non-perforated group (6 vs. 17). Seven of 17 patients with follow-up data in the perforated group experienced recurrence (41%), versus 19 of 104 in the non-perforated group (18%). In the non-perforated group, male sex (89% vs. 60%, p = 0.030), T4 stage (32% vs. 9%, p = 0.029), and fewer resected lymph nodes (12.5 vs. 18.6, p = 0.003) were significantly associated with recurrence; however, no such influences on recurrence were observed in the perforated group. The recurrence sites in the perforated group were mostly local (6 patients, 86%). Conversely, recurrences in the non-perforated group were mostly distant; 8 of 19 patients (42%) had liver metastasis and 1 (5%) had lung metastasis.

CONCLUSION

Patients with stage II PCRC experienced higher recurrence rates regardless of clinicopathological features and had high local recurrence rates indicating possible local tumor cell dispersal owing to perforation.

Perspective on the true incidence of bowel perforations occurring with extreme lateral lumbar interbody fusions. How should they be treated?

Background

What is the risk of bowel perforation (BP) with open or minimally invasive (MI) extreme lateral lumbar interbody fusion (XLIF)? What is the truth? Further, if peritoneal symptoms/signs arise following XLIF/MI XLIF, it is critical to obtain an emergent consultation with general surgery who can diagnose and treat a potential BP.

Literature Review

In multiple series, the frequency of BP ranged markedly from 0.03% (i.e. 1 of 2998 patients), to 0.08% (11/13,004), to 0.5%, to 8.3% (1 in 12 patients), up to 12.5% (1 in 8 patients). BPs attributed to different causes carry high mortality rates varying from 11.1% to 23%. For the 11 (0.08%) BP occurring out of 13,004 patients undergoing XLIF in one series, there was one (9.09%) death due to uncontrolled sepsis. In another series, where 31 BP were identified for multiple lumbar surgical procedures identified through PubMed (1960-2016), including 10 (32.2%) for lateral lumbar surgery including XLIF, the overall mortality rate was 12.9% (4/31).

Conclusion

The incidence of BPs occurring following XLIF/MI XLIF procedures ranged from 0.03% to 12.5% in various reports. What is the true incidence of these errors? Certainly, it is more critical that when spine surgeons' patients develop acute peritoneal symptoms/signs following these procedures, they immediately consult general surgery to both diagnose, and treat potential BP in a timely fashion to avoid the high morbidity (87.1%) and mortality rates (12.9%) attributed to these perforations.

Severe acute ischemic colitis: What is the place of endoscopy in the management strategy?

Background and study aims  Ischemic colitis (IC) is potentially lethal. Clinical and biology information and results of computed tomography (CT) scan and/or colonoscopy are used to assess its severity. However, decision-making about therapy remains a challenge. Patients and methods  This was a retrospective, single-center study between 2006 and 2015. Patients with severe IC who underwent endoscopic evaluation were included. The aims were to determine outcomes depending on endoscopic findings and assess the role of endoscopy in the management. Results  A total of 71 patients were included (men = 48 (68%), mean age = 71 ± 13 years). There was hemodynamic instability in 29 patients (41 %) and severity signs on CT scan in 18 (38 %). Twenty-nine patients (41 %) underwent surgery and 24 (34 %) died. The endoscopic grades were: 15 grade 1 (21 %), 32 grade 2 (45 %), and 24 grade 3 (34%). Regarding patients with grade 3 IC, 55 % had hemodynamic instability, 58 % had severity signs on CT scan, 68 % underwent surgery, and 55 % died. The decision to perform surgery was based on hemodynamic status in 62 % of cases, CT scan data in 14 %, endoscopic findings in 10 %, and other in 14 %. Colectomy was more frequent in patients with grade 3 IC ( P  < 0.05). A mismatch between mucosal aspect (necrosis) and serous (normal) was observed in 13 patients (46 %). Risk factors for colectomy in univariate analysis were aortic aneurysm surgery, hemodynamic instability, no colic enhancement on CT scan, and endoscopic grade 3. Risk factors for mortality in multivariate analysis were hemodynamic instability, colectomy, and Charlson score > 5 ( P  < 0.05). Conclusions  This study suggests a low impact of endoscopy on surgical decision making. Hemodynamic instability was the first indication for colectomy. A discrepancy between endoscopic mucosal (necrosis) and surgical serous (normal) aspects was frequently noted.

Perforated colorectal cancers: clinical outcomes of 18 patients who underwent emergency surgery

Introduction

Although colon cancer perforations are rare among acute abdominal syndromes, it is a clinical picture with high mortality that requires urgent treatment.

Aim

In this study, the clinical results of patients who were operated in emergency conditions due to colorectal cancer perforation were evaluated.

Material and methods

The data of 18 patients treated for colorectal cancer perforation in our clinic between February 2014 and February 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. The following data were evaluated: demographic features of the patients, location of the tumour, metastasis, stage of the tumour, number of lymph nodes dissected, survival, type, and prognosis of the surgery.

Results

Eight (44%) of 18 patients with perforated colon cancers were female and 10 (56%) were male. The mean age was 65.2 (31-104) years. Four of the patients had liver metastasis only, and 5 had multiple metastases. All cases had sudden abdominal pain and acute abdominal clinical findings. Fourteen of the patients underwent full resection, and 4 of them underwent partial resection and trephine stoma (colostomy). Perioperative mortality was not observed. The long-term mortality rate in our study was 77.7% (n = 14), and the operative mortality rate was 44% (n = 8). Additional organ injuries occurred during resection in 2 patients.

Conclusions

Colorectal cancer perforation seen in advanced ages is one of the causes of acute abdominal syndrome, which can be fatal. The general condition of the patient and the size and localization of the perforation should be taken into consideration in the choice of treatment. Curative surgery can also be performed in perforated colorectal cancers. However, partial resection and trephine colostomy should be performed in patients with multiple metastases and poor general condition.

Natural History and Surgical Management of Colonic Perforations in Vascular Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome: A Retrospective Review

BACKGROUND

Vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome is a rare and severe genetic condition leading to spontaneous, potentially life-threatening arterial and digestive complications. Colonic ruptures are a common feature of the disease, but clear recommendations on their management are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to identify surgery-related morbidity and 30-day postoperative mortality after colonic perforation.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective review.

SETTING

A large cohort of patients with vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome was followed in a tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Between 2000 and 2016, the French National Reference Centre for Rare Vascular Diseases (HEGP, AP-HP, Paris, France) followed 148 patients with molecularly proven vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcomes measured were surgery-related morbidity and 30-day postoperative mortality.

RESULTS

Of 133 patients with molecularly proven vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, 30 (22%) had a history of colonic perforation and 15 (50%) were males. These subjects were diagnosed with vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome at a younger age than patients with a history of GI events without colonic perforation (p = 0.0007). There were 46 colonic perforations, median 1.0 event per patient (interquartile range, 1.0-2.0). Reperforations occurred in 14 (47%) patients, mostly males. Surgical management consisted of Hartmann procedures or subtotal abdominal colectomies, with a nonnegligible rate of reperforation following partial colonic resection (11 patients, 41%).

LIMITATIONS

The main limitations of this work are its retrospective design and that the diagnosis of vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome was made after colonic perforations in a majority of patients.

CONCLUSION

Colonic perforations seem more severe in males, with a high rate of reperforation after Hartmann procedure. Subtotal colectomy may reduce digestive morbidity, particularly in male patients. Additional studies are required to identify other predictors of reperforation. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A937.

Clinical outcomes and factors related to colonic perforations in patients receiving self-expandable metal stent insertion for malignant colorectal obstruction

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Although colonic perforation is a dreadful adverse event associated with stent placement, data on this topic are sparse. We aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of colonic perforation and factors related to its occurrence in patients who received self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs) for malignant colorectal obstruction.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the data of 474 patients with malignant colorectal obstruction who received endoscopic SEMS insertion from April 2004 to May 2011 in Severance Hospital and Gangnam Severance Hospital. Early perforation, defined as perforation occurring within 2 weeks, was assessed in bridge-to-surgery (n = 164) and palliative stent placement patient groups (n = 310). Delayed perforation was analyzed using data from the palliative stent placement group alone.

RESULTS

The technical and clinical success rates were 90.5% and 81.0%, respectively. Early and delayed perforations occurred in 2.7% (13/474) and 2.7% (8/301) of patients, respectively. Among 21 patients with perforation, 14 (66.7%) received emergency surgery and 5 (23.8%) died within 30 days after perforation. Regarding the perforation-related factors, age ≥70 years (odds ratio, 3.276; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.041-10.309) and sigmoid colonic location (odds ratio, 7.706; 95% CI, 1.681-35.317) were independently associated with occurrence of early perforation. Stent location in the flexure (hazard ratio, 17.573; 95% CI, 2.004-154.093) and absence of peritoneal carcinomatosis (hazard ratio, 6.139; 95% CI, 1.150-32.776) were significantly associated with delayed perforation.

CONCLUSIONS

The perforation-related 30-day mortality rate was 23.8%. Older age and sigmoid colonic location were significantly associated with occurrence of early perforation, whereas flexure location and absence of peritoneal carcinomatosis were related to delayed perforation.

Postoperative recurrence and risk factors of colorectal cancer perforation

PURPOSE

The common causes of colorectal perforation are benign. However, perforated colorectal cancer confers a risk of recurrence in the long term because of the malignant nature of the disease. In addition, the recurrence rate can also increase because of dissemination of cancer cells, reduced extent of lymph node dissection to prioritize saving life, and other reasons.

METHODS

We evaluated the clinical features and postoperative recurrence in patients with perforated colorectal cancer who developed general peritonitis and underwent emergency surgery during a 7-year period between April 2007 and March 2014.

RESULTS

During the study period, 44 patients had colorectal cancer perforation. The cancer sites were the ascending colon in 6 patients, transverse colon in 1, descending colon in 4, sigmoid colon in 15, and rectum in 18. The disease stage was stage II in 18 patients, stage III in 15, and stage IV in 7. Among 22 patients who could be followed up, 8 had postoperative recurrence. The recurrence rates were 18.2% for stage II cancer and 54.5% for stage III. Postoperative recurrence was more likely to occur in the patients positive for lymph node metastasis, those with poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma, those with T4 cancer, and those who did not receive postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

The recurrence rate was higher in the patients with perforated colorectal cancer than in those who underwent surgery for common colorectal cancer. The prognosis can be expected to improve by performing standard surgical procedures, to the maximum extent possible, followed by postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy.

Urgent surgery after emergency presentation for colorectal cancer has no impact on overall and disease-free survival: a propensity score analysis

Background

It remains a matter of debate whether colorectal cancer resection in an emergency setting negatively impacts on survival. Our objective was therefore to assess the impact of urgent versus elective operation on overall and disease-free survival in patients undergoing resection for colorectal cancer by using propensity score adjusted analysis.

Methods

In a single-center study patients operated for colorectal cancer between 1989 and 2013 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Median follow-up was 44 months. Patients with neoadjuvant treatment were excluded. The impact of urgent operation on overall and disease-free survival was assessed using both Cox regression and propensity score analyses.

Results

Of 747 patients with colorectal cancer, 84 (11 %) had urgent and 663 elective cancer resection. The propensity score revealed strongly biased patient characteristics (0.22 ± 0.16 vs. 0.10 ± 0.09; P < 0.001). In unadjusted analysis urgent operation was associated with a 35 % increased risk of overall mortality (hazard ratio(HR) of death = 1.35, 95 % confidence interval(CI):1.02–1.78, P = 0.045). In risk-adjusted Cox regression analysis urgent operation was not associated with poor overall (HR = 1.08, 95 %CI:0.79–1.48; P = 0.629) or disease-free survival (HR = 1.02, 95 %CI:0.76–1.38; P = 0.877). Similarly in propensity score analysis urgent operation did not influence overall (HR = 0.98, 95 % CI:0.74–1.29), P = 0.872) and disease-free survival (HR = 0.89, 95 %CI:0.68 to 1.16, P = 0.387).

Conclusions

This study provides evidence that worse oncologic outcomes after urgent operation for colorectal cancer are caused by clinical circumstances and not due to the urgent operation itself. Urgent operation is not a risk factor for colorectal cancer resection.

Day and night surgery: is there any influence in the patient postoperative period of urgent colorectal intervention?

BACKGROUND

Medical activity performed outside regular work hours may increase risk for patients and professionals. There is few data with respect to urgent colorectal surgery. The aim of this work was to evaluate the impact of daytime versus nighttime surgery on postoperative period of patients with acute colorectal disease.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted in a sample of patients with acute colorectal disease who underwent urgent surgery at the General Surgery Unit of Braga Hospital, between January 2005 and March 2013. Patients were stratified by operative time of day into a daytime group (surgery between 8:00 and 20:59) and the nighttime group (21:00-7:59) and compared for clinical and surgical parameters. A questionnaire was distributed to surgeons, covering aspects related to the practice of urgent colorectal surgery and fatigue.

RESULTS

A total of 330 patients were included, with 214 (64.8%) in the daytime group and 116 (35.2%) in the nighttime group. Colorectal cancer was the most frequent pathology. Waiting time (p < 0.001) and total length of hospital stay (p = 0.008) were significantly longer in the daytime group. There were no significant differences with respect to early or late complications. However, 100% of surgeons reported that they are less proficient during nighttime.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with acute colorectal disease subjected to urgent surgery, there was no significant association between nighttime surgery and the presence of postoperative medical and surgical morbidities. Patients who were subjected to daytime surgery had longer length of stay at the hospital.

Pneumoretroperitoneum and Pneumomediastinum Revealing a Left Colon Perforation

Left colon perforation usually occurs in complicated diverticulitis or cancer. The most frequent signs are intraperitoneal abscess or peritonitis. In cases of retroperitoneal colonic perforation, diagnosis may be difficult. A 59-year-old woman presented with left thigh pain and with abdominal discomfort associated with mild dyspnea. Computed tomography scan showed air bubbles and purulent collection in the retroperitoneum, with subcutaneous emphysema extending from the left thigh to the neck. Computed tomography scan also revealed portal vein gas and thrombosis with multiple liver abscesses. An emergency laparotomy revealed a perforation of the proximal left colon. No masses were found. A left colectomy was performed. The retroperitoneum was drained and washed extensively. A negative pressure wound therapy was applied. A second-look laparotomy was performed 48 hours later. The retroperitoneum was drained and an end colostomy was performed. Intensive Care Unit postoperative stay was 9 days, and the patient was discharged on the 32nd postoperative day. Pneumoretroperitoneum and pneumomediastinum are rare signs of colonic retroperitoneal perforation. The diagnosis may be delayed, especially in the absence of peritoneal irritation. Clinical, laboratory, and especially radiologic parameters might be useful. Surgical treatment must be prompt to improve prognosis.

Spontaneous perforation of the colon clinical review of five episodes in four patients

Spontaneous perforation of the colon is rare and is classified as "Idiopathic" and "Stercoral." Four patients with a total of 5 episodes of spontaneous perforation of the large bowel treated at the department of surgery, Rustaq hospital over the past 5 years are presented in this study as well as a literature review of clinical and pathological characteristics of each case. Spontaneous perforation of the colon should be considered in the differential diagnosis of patients with acute peritonitis and free gas under the diaphragm. The condition is usually associated with chronic constipation and the use of NSAIDs. Early surgical intervention reduces morbidity and mortality.

Resection and primary anastomosis without diverting ileostomy for left colon emergencies: is it a safe procedure?

INTRODUCTION

Large-bowel obstruction and perforation are still frequently occurring entities for the acute care surgeon. In these cases, Hartmann's procedure is the most commonly used surgical technique. However, recent papers demonstrate that colon resection and primary anastomosis (RPA) in the emergency setting is a safe and feasible procedure. We present our series of left colon resection and primary anastomosis procedures from Torrevieja Hospital (Alicante, Spain), performed without bowel irrigation or a diverting ileostomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-two RPA procedures were performed in emergency settings for perforation or obstruction, or both, during an 18-month period. The following data were prospectively collected: age, gender, nationality, diagnoses, ASA score, body mass index (BMI), POSSUM score (Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enumeration of Mortality and morbidity), and the score according to the Hinchey classification. Furthermore, duration of the operation, length of postoperative hospital stay, and mortality and morbidity data were recorded.

RESULTS

Sixteen of these patients were diagnosed with acute diverticulitis, 14 patients with neoplasm (of which 9 cases had obstruction, 2 cases had perforation, and 3 cases had both), and foreign body perforation in the remaining 2 cases. The mean hospital stay was 7.8 (range, 4-10) days. The physiological POSSUM score was 24.4 (range, 15-39), and the surgical POSSUM score was 19.8 (range, 16-24). None of the patients died (0% mortality). Seven patients developed some kind of complication (21.9%), all of which were managed conservatively.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that RPA for left colon obstruction and perforation in emergency settings can be safely performed in certain surgical conditions.

Generalized peritonitis due to perforated diverticulitis: Hartmann's procedure or primary anastomosis?

PURPOSE

Hartmann's procedure (HP) still remains the most frequently performed procedure for diffuse peritonitis due to perforated diverticulitis. The aims of this study were to assess the feasibility and safety of resection with primary anastomosis (RPA) in patients with purulent or fecal diverticular peritonitis and review morbidity and mortality after single stage procedure and Hartmann in our experience.

METHODS

From January 1995 through December 2008, patients operated for generalized diverticular peritonitis were studied. Patients were classified into two main groups: RPA and HP.

RESULTS

A total of 87 patients underwent emergency surgery for diverticulitis complicated with purulent or diffuse fecal peritonitis. Sixty (69%) had undergone HP while RPA was performed in 27 patients (31%). At the multivariate analysis, RPA was associated with less post-operative complications (P < 0.05). Three out of the 27 patients with RPA (11.1%) developed a clinical anastomotic leakage and needed re-operation.

CONCLUSIONS

RPA can be safely performed without adding morbidity and mortality in cases of diffuse diverticular peritonitis. HP should be reserved only for hemodynamically unstable or high-risk patients. Specialization in colorectal surgery improves mortality and raises the percentage of one-stage procedures.

Predictors of outcome following surgery in colonic perforation: an institution's experience over 6 years

BACKGROUND

Colonic perforation is associated with abysmal outcome. The aims of our study were to review the surgical outcome of patients with perforated colon and to identify factors predicting peri-operative complications.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients who underwent surgery for colonic perforation from January 2003 to August 2008 was performed. Patients with iatrogenic or traumatic perforation were excluded. The severity of abdominal sepsis was graded using the Mannheim peritonitis index (MPI).

RESULTS

A total of 129 patients, with median age of 65 years (22-97 years), formed the study group. While 29.5% had severe peritoneal contamination, 56.6% had an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score ≥3. Sigmoid colon (47.3%) and caecum (24.8%) were the most common sites of perforation. Diverticulitis and malignancy were the diagnoses in 51.9% and 34.9%, respectively. Hartmann's procedure and right hemicolectomy were performed in 43.4% and 34.1% of the patients, respectively. Stoma was created in 59.7%. The in-hospital mortality rate in our series was 15.5%. After multivariate analysis, the independent variables associated with worse peri-operative complications were ASA score ≥3, MPI >26 and creation of stoma. Malignant perforation was associated with higher ASA score and lower haematocrit level compared to diverticular perforation. Stoma was created more frequently in patients with MPI >26 and left-sided perforation, and was associated with worse complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery for colonic perforation is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Short-term outcome is determined by ASA score and severity of peritonitis. A lower haematocrit level must alert the possibility of malignancy.

Logistics and outcome in urgent and emergency colorectal surgery

AIM

Infrastructure-related factors are seldom described in detail in studies on outcome after surgical procedures. We studied patient, procedure, physician and infrastructure characteristics and their effect on outcome at a Norwegian University hospital.

METHOD

All patients admitted between 1st January 2002 and 30th June 2003 who underwent urgent or emergency colorectal surgery were extracted from the hospital databases and retrospectively analysed.

RESULTS

There were 196 patients. The overall complication rate was 39%. Forty-six (24%) patients died during admission after surgery. Those who died were less likely to be operated by a subspecialized colorectal surgeon (17%vs 30%, P = 0.001). The anaesthesiologist was a resident in most of the cases (> 75%) for both those who survived and those who died. Surgery performed out-of-office hours was common in both groups, although the patients who died were more likely to be operated upon at night (28%vs 18%, P = 0.001). The time interval standard from admission to surgery was met in only 84 (43%) patients. Forty-nine (49/196, 25%) procedures were delayed beyond the time requested by the surgeon by more than 120 min (mean 363 min).

CONCLUSION

The outcome after emergency colorectal surgery was consistent with the literature but the infrastructure was not optimal. Improvements may be achieved by a focus on decreasing waiting times, abandoning of out-of-office emergency surgery and increasing the involvement of senior staff.

Acuity and survival in colon cancer surgery

PURPOSE

Reports indicate that up to 40% of patients with colon cancer require nonelective resection, which has been shown to portend worse long-term prognosis compared with elective resection. We used a national database to identify specific preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative factors mediating the acuity-survival relationship in an effort to identify areas of medical practice that can serve as targets for improvement in cancer care.

METHODS

We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare-linked database to identify non-health maintenance organization-enrolled people aged 66 years and older who were diagnosed with stages I to III colon cancer between 1996 and 2003 (N = 30,685). Using stepwise, multivariate Cox regression, disease-specific survival was compared in patients undergoing elective vs nonelective resection. Adjustment for preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative variables was performed to identify factors contributing to the acuity-survival relationship.

RESULTS

Five-year disease-specific survival was 86.3% after elective and 75.4% after nonelective colon resection (hazard ratio, 1.92; P < .001). A significant proportion of this disparity was the result of differences in stage and patient characteristics, particularly age and comorbidity burden, at the time of resection. Differences in adequacy of nodal assessment and the use of surveillance colonoscopy and adjuvant chemotherapy, however, also contributed to the disparity. After adjustment for these factors, the hazard ratio for nonelective resection was 1.30 (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Nonelective resection of colon cancer is associated with poor long-term prognosis compared with elective resection. Disease-specific survival among patients undergoing nonelective surgery may be improved by addressing insufficient nodal assessment, inadequate follow-up care, and underutilization of appropriate, adjuvant chemotherapy.

Incidence, patterns of failure, and prognosis of perforated colorectal cancers in a well-defined population

INTRODUCTION

Few population-based studies investigate perforated colorectal cancers. This study was designed to compare the epidemiologic characteristics of perforated CRC with those of uncomplicated CRC and to determine patterns of failure and prognosis in a well-defined French population.

METHODS

Between 1976 and 2000, 89 patients who received an emergency operation caused by perforation and 5,462 who underwent elective surgery were registered in the digestive cancer registry of Burgundy (France).

RESULTS

Perforated colorectal cancers represented 1.6 percent of registered colorectal cancers. The five-year cumulative local recurrence rate was higher for perforated (15.7 percent) than for uncomplicated cancers (7.8 percent; P = 0.021), as well as for the peritoneal carcinomatosis rate (respectively 13.8 and 6.3 percent; P = 0.036). In multivariate analysis, perforation was an independent risk factor for local recurrence or peritoneal carcinomatosis (odds ratio, 2.17; P = 0.004). Operative mortality was higher among perforated cancers (20.2 percent) than after elective surgery (6.6 percent, P < 0.001). The five-year relative survival rates were 37 percent after emergency surgery and 49.2 percent after elective surgery (P = 0.036). After adjustment for sex, stage, and age, perforation remained significantly associated with a poor prognosis. After exclusion of operative mortality, perforation was no more significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Perforation is a rare complication of colorectal cancer. The prognosis is poor because of high operative mortality and high risk of local recurrence and peritoneal carcinomatosis.

Profile and Significance of Emergency Colonic Resections

The objectives of this study are to define the distinguishing features between elective and emergency colonic surgery. The records of adult patients who underwent elective and emergent colonic resection over a 4-year period were retrospectively reviewed. Univariate analysis was performed to compare outcomes for elective and emergency procedures and multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the significant predictors of outcome. Three hundred and thirty-eight elective and 147 emergency colonic resections were performed. Diverticular disease was most common in the emergency group (43.5% vs 14.2%, P = 0.001) whereas malignancy predominated in the elective group (56.2% vs 5.4%, P = 0.001). The emergency group accounted for 54.7 per cent and 79.3 per cent of the total morbidity and mortality. Emergency colonic surgery has distinctive features and significance. Emergency surgery for colonic obstruction and total/subtotal resection are associated with higher morbidity and mortality. Diverticular disease compares favorably to other pathologies in postoperative outcome.

Outcome Analysis of Patients Undergoing Colorectal Resection for Emergent and Elective Indications

Despite advances in perioperative care and operative techniques, urgent colorectal operations are associated with higher morbidity and mortality. To evaluate our rate of complications in elective and urgent colorectal operations, we performed retrospective chart review of 209 consecutive patients who underwent colorectal resection between 1998 and 2002 at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center. One hundred, forty-three (71%) patients underwent elective colorectal resection. A total of 19 (13.3%) complications occurred in the elective group, compared with 24 (38.1%) in the urgent group ( P = 0.003). Both right-sided and left-sided operations were associated with higher incidence of complications when performed urgently. Wound infection occurred in 7.7 per cent of patients undergoing an elective operation and 14.3 per cent in an urgent setting ( P = 0.21). Intra-abdominal abscess occurred in 1.4 per cent of patients undergoing elective operation, compared with 11.1 per cent in the urgent operation group. Four (1.9%) patients developed wound dehiscence, 1 in elective and 3 in the urgent group ( P = 0.09). Anastomotic leak occurred in 1.9 per cent of patients, 2 in each group ( P = 0.6). There were six deaths, 3 in elective and 3 in urgent cases ( P = 0.4). Urgent operation of the colon and rectum is associated with higher incidence of complications. Both right- and left-sided resections have a higher complication rate when performed in a nonelective setting.

Anastomotic leakage after elective right versus left colectomy for cancer: prevalence and independent risk factors

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery remains a major challenge because of its early and late consequences.

STUDY DESIGN

To determine whether prevalence and risk factors for anastomotic leakage (AL) differed between right and left elective colectomy for cancer, we conducted univariate and multivariate analyses and compared 33 variables (15 preoperative, 18 intraoperative) culled prospectively for 520 right and 1,230 left colectomies, followed by immediate anastomosis in 1,750 adult patients with or without AL.

RESULTS

The overall AL rate was 4% (71 of 1,750) and was significantly lower (p < 0.0001) for right (7 of 520=1.35%) than for left colectomy (64 of 1,230=5.20%). Overall mortality was 4.1% (68 of 1,750), and was not statistically different (p=0.50) between right (4.6%, 24 of 520) and left (3.6%, 44 of 1,230)) colectomy. In right colectomy, differences in associated mortality rates with (14.3%, 1 of 7) and without (4.5%, 23 of 513) AL were not statistically significant (p=0.28), but in left colectomy, associated mortality was statistically significantly higher (p < 0.006) with AL (10.9%, 7 of 64) than without it (3.2%, 37 of 1,166). Independent risk factors for AL were preoperative in right colectomy: loss of weight (> 10%), odds ratio (OR)=5.62, with 95% CI 1.06 to 29.8; and intraoperative in left colectomy: palliative resection (OR=2.12; 95% CI 1.06 to 4.23), "poor" colonic cleanliness (OR=2.4; 95% CI 1.34 to 4.28), proximal colorectal anastomosis (OR=1.34; 95% CI 1 to 1.8), and distal colorectal anastomosis (OR=3.91; 95% CI 1.64 to 9.81).

CONCLUSIONS

In right colectomy for cancer, preoperative nutritive support leading to regain of lost weight could reduce postoperative morbidity. Concerning left colectomy, if colonic cleanliness is poor, intraoperative colonic lavage should be done. When poor colonic cleanliness is associated with palliative resection and low distal rectal anastomosis, a protective stoma should be considered.

Emergency left colon resection for acute perforation: primary anastomosis or Hartmann's procedure? A case-matched control study

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment remains controversial for acute left-sided colon perforation. Therefore, the effectiveness and safety of primary anastomosis versus Hartmann's operation (HP) was compared in a case-matched control study.

METHODS

Thirty consecutive patients with primary anastomosis and protective ileostomy (PAS) were matched to 30 HP patients, controlling for age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, body mass index (BMI), and peritonitis severity (Hinchey). In a second analysis, PAS patients with purulent peritonitis (Hinchey 3) were matched to patients with primary anastomosis without ileostomy (PA).

RESULTS

Hospital mortality was similar between HP (17%) and PAS (10%). Complication frequency and severity (requiring re-intervention or admission to the Intensive Care Unit [ICU]) were comparable for the first operation (60% versus 56% and 30% versus 32%). The stoma reversal rate was higher in PAS than in HP (96% versus 60%, p = 0.001), with significantly fewer complications (23% versus 66%, p = 0.02), and lower severity (7% versus 33%, p = 0.02). Additional analysis of PAS versus PA showed similar morbidity (52% versus 41%, p = 0.45) and complication severity (18% versus 24%, p = 0.51), whereas overall operation time and hospital stay were significantly shorter in PA (169 versus 320 min, p = 0.003, 17 versus 28 days, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Primary anastomosis and protective ileostomy is a superior treatment to HP in acute left-sided colon perforation. In the absence of feculent peritonitis an ileostomy appears unnecessary.

Resultados a largo plazo de la cirugía urgente y electiva del cáncer de colon. Estudio comparativo

INTRODUCTION

Currently, the mechanisms that worsen the prognosis of complicated colon cancers are still not well known. Moreover, the possible effect of using sound oncological principles in emergency surgery on long-term prognosis has not been studied in detail.

AIMS

The aim of the present study was to analyze the 5-year efficacy of curative oncological surgery for complicated colon cancer performed in an emergency setting in terms of tumor recurrence and survival compared with elective surgery of uncomplicated tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

We performed a prospective observational cohort study in patients who underwent emergency surgery for complicated colon cancer (group 1) and patients who underwent elective surgery (group 2). Exclusion criteria were tumors of less than 15 cm from the anal verge, palliative surgery, and distant metastases.

RESULTS

During the study period, 646 patients underwent surgery: there were 165 (25.5%) emergency surgeries and 481 (74.5%) elective interventions. Surgery was considered curative in 456 (70.6%) patients: 102 (22.4%) emergency and 354 (77.6%) elective surgeries. Significant differences were found in disease stage between the 2 groups (P = 0.003). The postoperative mortality rate was 12.7% in group 1 and 3.4% in group 2 (P = 0.001). When patients were stratified by TNM stage, worse 5-year cancer-related and disease-free survival rates were observed in group 1 patients with stage II tumors. No differences were found in cancer-related survival rates in stage III patients (P = 0.178). There were no significant differences in overall survival, cancer-related survival or tumor recurrence rates when group 1 was compared with a subgroup of patients in group 2 with factors of poor prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Complicated colon cancer presents in more advanced stages and had a worse overall long-term prognosis than uncomplicated tumour. These differences decrease when patients are subclassified by tumoral stage. Overall survival and cancer-related survival rates similar to those of elective surgery can be achieved in emergency surgery when curative oncological resection is performed.

Ischemic colitis

BACKGROUND

Ischemic colitis almost always occurs in older patients. Because life expectancy is increasing, more and more often physicians will face this problem. The aim of this study was to identify factors leading to surgery in the acute phase of the disease, and to evaluate mortality and long-term follow-up evaluation.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of 73 patients (mean age, 73 y) in the Department of General and Digestive Surgery. Diagnosis was obtained by endoscopic and pathologic procedures. The median follow-up period was 4.5 years (range, 2-9 y).

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients had 1 or more co-existing medical diseases. All the patients had either lower intestinal bleeding (45 patients) or diarrhea (28 patients). Thirty-three patients had undergone surgery (45%). In the surgical group, 13 patients underwent immediate surgery for abdominal tenderness and/or shock. Eight of these patients died (62%). Out of 60 patients undergoing nonsurgical immediate management, 1 patient died (septic shock). Delayed surgery was indicated in 20 out of the 59 remaining patients for clinical or endoscopic aggravation. Six of these patients died (30%). Multivariate analysis selected 4 factors of severity: age younger than 80 years, male sex, absence of bleeding, and abdominal tenderness. In the follow-up period 13 patients died from a cardiovascular disease. The 2- and 5-year actuarial survival rates of patients who survived the initial hospitalization were 88% and 68%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Multivariate analysis selected the risk factors of severity. In severely ill patients serial endoscopic evaluations are the best indicator for surgery before appearance of tenderness, septic shock, full-thickness gangrene, and perforation. At discharge, anticoagulant or anti-arrhythmic therapy should be considered for patients who have cardiovascular disease.

Safety of bowel resection for colorectal surgical emergency in the elderly

OBJECTIVE

Colorectal emergency requiring radical surgery is becoming increasingly frequent in the elderly and problems remain as regards the best management policy. Our long-time experience is presented in this study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In the last 23 years, 105 elderly patients, aged > or = 65 years, with colorectal disease underwent an emergency operation in our Surgical Department. Forty-five patients (mean age 72 years) had benign disease and 60 patients (mean age 76.5 years) colorectal carcinoma.

RESULTS

The carcinoma was located in the left colon (68%), right colon (18%) and rectum (14%). Mostly, patients with malignant cancer presented with obstructive ileus, and patients with benign tumours with perforation and peritonitis, with a predominance of diverticulitis. A resection operation either with primary anastomosis or Hartmann's procedure was performed in 75% of cases; in the rest, only palliation was resorted to. Forty-three percent of the patients with colorectal cancer emergency were > or = 80 years of age. The mean morbidity was 25% and mortality 17%, which make up to 33% and 26.6% for benign disease, and 20% and 10% for malignant cancer, respectively. The mortality rate was higher in patients with perforation than those with obstruction.

CONCLUSION

Advanced age is not a contraindication to radical surgery in case of colorectal emergency in the elderly. In the majority, a resection operation is feasible. In high-risk patients, colostomy is a life-saving alternative.

Perfuração intestinal por enema aquoso: uma complicação pouco conhecida

A perfuração intestinal é uma ocorrência freqüente nos serviços de emergência, sendo iatrogênica em 6% dos casos. Pode tratar-se de uma complicação do uso de enemas aquosos retrógrados; a qual é rara, não tendo, pois, incidência conhecida. Apresentamos o relato de um paciente de 69 anos que após submeter-se a enema aquoso para preparo intestinal, evoluiu com quadro de dor abdominal súbita, vômitos, sinais de irritação peritoneal e comprometimento do estado geral. Após laparotomia exploradora, constatou-se perfuração no reto. A importância do relato é atentar para uma grave e pouco conhecida complicação de um procedimento rotineiro, que muitas vezes não é diagnosticada pela falta de uma história clínica relevante ou omissão pelas instituições que temem implicações judiciais.

La cirugía en el cáncer de colon complicado

Colorectal cancer continues to have a serious social impact. A large proportion of patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage of the disease. Approximately one-third of patients with colorectal cancer will undergo emergency surgery for a complicated tumor, with a high risk of mortality and poorer long-term prognosis. The most frequent complications are obstruction and perforation, while massive hemorrhage is rare. The curative potential of surgery, whether urgent or elective, depends on how radical the resection is, among other factors. In the literature on the management of urgent colorectal disease, there are few references to the oncological criteria for resection. Uncertainly about the optimal treatment has led to wide variability in the treatment of this entity. The present article aims to provide a critical appraisal of the controversies surrounding the role of surgery and its impact on complicated colorectal cancer.

[Ischemic colitis: two forms of clinical presentation and outcome]

OBJECTIVES

To characterize the clinical presentation and outcomes of ischemic colitis in our environment with a view to identifying risk factors.

METHOD

Fifty-one patients diagnosed in our hospital with ischemic colitis over a 5-year period (1998-2002) were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic data, clinical symptoms, diagnosis and treatment were studied. Two groups (surgical patients [n = 28] and nonsurgical patients [n = 23]) were compared.

RESULTS

No significant differences between the two groups were found in demographic data and associated disease. Diagnosis was performed by colonoscopy in nonsurgical patients and by analysis of the surgical specimen in almost all surgical patients. The presenting symptom was lower gastrointestinal bleeding in nonsurgical patients (p < 0.05) and peritonism in surgical patients (p < 0.05). Mortality was significantly higher in patients older than 80 years than in younger patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Lower gastrointestinal bleeding was more common as the presenting symptom in transitory forms of ischemic colitis. An acute abdomen indicates serious forms requiring surgery. Therefore the initial clinical symptoms determine the treatment provided. Advanced age is a poor prognostic factor for ischemic colitis. Risk factors in our series were presentation as acute abdomen and advanced age.

Comparative study of left colonic Peritonitis Severity Score and Mannheim Peritonitis Index

BACKGROUND

Prognostic evaluation of patients with left colonic perforation is useful in predicting mortality. The aims of this prospective study were to determine the prognostic value of the left colonic Peritonitis Severity Score (PSS) and to compare it with the Mannheim Peritonitis Index (MPI).

METHODS

One-hundred and fifty-six patients underwent emergency operation for distal colonic peritonitis. The PSS and MPI were calculated for each patient. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient was used to measure the association between the two scores. The predictive power of the two scoring systems and their differences were studied using the area under the receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curve.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients died (26.3 per cent). The relationship between scores and mortality was statistically significant for each scoring system (P < 0.001). The Spearman rank correlation coefficient for the correlation between the MPI and PSS was 0.55 (P < 0.001). There was no difference between areas under the ROC curves for the two systems.

CONCLUSION

The PSS and MPI are both well validated scoring systems for left colonic peritonitis. Their routine use might allow stratification of patients according to mortality risk.

Anastomotic dehiscence after resection and primary anastomosis in left-sided colonic emergencies

PURPOSE

There is no consensus about the risk factors for anastomotic failure after elective or emergency colorectal surgery. The purpose of this study was to analyze the factors that may contribute in anastomotic dehiscence.

METHODS

A total of 208 patients who underwent left colonic resection and primary anastomosis for distal colonic emergencies were studied. Preoperative and operative variables analyzed for each patient were gender, age, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, comorbidities, indication for surgery, etiology of the disease, presence and grade of peritonitis, preoperative creatinine, hematocrit, hemoglobin, and leukocyte count, need for preoperative and operative transfusion. The end point was the clinical evident incidence of anastomotic leak. Bivariate comparisons of those patients with or without anastomotic leak were unpaired, and all tests of significance were two-tailed. A multivariate analysis, in which presentation of anastomotic leak was the dependent outcome variable, was performed by forward stepwise logistic regression model.

RESULTS

One hundred five patients (50.4 percent) had one or more complications. Anastomotic leak was diagnosed in 12 patients (5.7 percent). Seventeen patients (8.2 percent) needed a reoperation for complication. The overall mortality was 6.2 percent (13 patients). Obesity was significant as a predictor of anastomotic leak.

CONCLUSIONS

Obesity is a factor predicting anastomotic leak risk after resection and primary anastomosis for left-sided colonic emergencies.

One-stage resection without colonic lavage in emergency surgery of the left colon

OBJECTIVE

Intra-operative colonic lavage is a widespread procedure introduced to decompress and clean the colon of its faecal load during emergency surgery of the left colon in order to perform a safe anastomosis. This type of lavage is never performed at our institution. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and acceptability of emergency left-sided colectomy without colonic lavage in a consecutive series of patients admitted at our department for perforation and obstruction of the left colon.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All 44 patients (29 with obstruction and 15 with perforation) on whom a one-stage left-sided colon resection was performed without colonic lavage between January 1998 and June 2004 were evaluated in a retrospective review. During this period all patients with acute disease of the left colon underwent a one stage resection without colonic lavage. The only exclusion criteria for anastomosis were: haemodynamic instability, ASA > 3, unresectable tumour. Death, anastomotic leakage and wound infection were main outcome measures.

RESULT

The leak rate was 4.5% and mortality 2.3% due to one case of postoperative myocardial infarction. A 16% morbidity rate was recorded due to 4 wound infections and 3 minor complications.

CONCLUSION

The procedure is safe. The low morbidity and mortality of one stage resection without colonic lavage can justify future prospective studies enrolling a large number of patients to compare its results with those obtained by one stage resection with colonic lavage.

A prospective study of outcomes of emergency and elective surgeries for complicated colonic cancer

BACKGROUND

Although a significantly decreased long-term survival has been observed in patients undergoing surgery for complicated colorectal tumors compared with uncomplicated ones, the role of radical oncologic surgery on emergency colonic cancer is not defined clearly. The aim of this study was to analyze the efficacy of a curative emergency surgery in terms of tumor recurrence and cancer-related survival compared with elective colonic surgery.

METHODS

Between January 1996 and December 1998, all patients with colonic cancer deemed to have undergone a curative resection were considered for inclusion in this prospective study. Patients were classified into 2 groups: group 1, after emergency surgery for complicated colonic cancer, and group 2, patients undergoing elective surgery. The main end points were cancer-related survival and the probability of being free from recurrence at 3 years.

RESULTS

Of the 266 patients included in the study, 59 patients (22.2%) were in group 1 and 207 patients (77.8%) were in group 2. Postoperative mortality was higher in group 1 (P=.0004). After patients were stratified by the tumor node metastasis system, differences between the groups with respect to overall survival of stage II tumors (P=.0728), the probability of being free from recurrence (P=.0827), and cancer-related survival (P=.1071) of stage III cancers did not reach statistical significance. Differences were observed for the overall survival in stage III tumors (P=.0007), and for the probability of being free from recurrence (P=.0011) and cancer-related survival (P=.0029) in stage II cancers. When patients with elective stage II tumors presenting 1 or more negative prognostic factor were compared with emergency patients affected by a stage II colonic cancer, no differences were observed.

CONCLUSION

Curative surgeries for complicated colonic cancer are acceptable in emergency conditions. Cancer-related survival and recurrence in patients with complicated colonic cancers may approach that of elective surgery if a surgical treatment with radical oncologic criteria is performed.

Hartmann's colectomy and reversal in diverticulitis: a population-level assessment

PURPOSE

This study was designed to assess the costs and outcomes of colostomy and colostomy reversal in patients with diverticulitis and examine the impact of such procedures on the health care system.

METHODS

We employed a retrospective design and used a Washington State administrative database to identify patients undergoing operations with colostomy (1987-2002) who were followed over time. Descriptive and comparative analysis was performed, focusing on patients with diverticulitis.

RESULTS

There were 16,556 patients who underwent colostomy and 5,420 (32.7 percent) were for diverticulitis and its related complications (mean age, 64.8 +/- 15.1 years; 53.2 percent female). In patients with diverticulitis, the rate of colostomy reversal was 56.3 percent (80 percent in patients less than 50 years, and 30 percent in patients over 77 years). The in-hospital mortality rate after colostomy reversal was 0.36 percent, and was 2.6 percent in those over 77 years of age. After colostomy reversal a second stoma was used in 3.4 percent, reoperation was required for bleeding complications in 0.6 percent, and infectious complications were noted in 2 percent. The length of time from colostomy to its reversal was approximately five months (138.1 +/- 164 days; interquartile range, 72-156). The relationship between the length of time from colostomy to reversal was evaluated and the adjusted odds of a second stoma being used at the time of colostomy reversal were 45 percent higher (odds ratio, 1.45; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.22, 1.73) for each increase in time interval (<3, 6-9, 9-12, >12 months).

CONCLUSIONS

One-third of all colostomies were related to diverticulitis and only 56 percent were reversed. We identified a higher than expected mortality rate among older patients undergoing colostomy reversal. The impact of colostomy and reversal operations on both patients and the health care system is significant.

Primary anastomosis or Hartmann's procedure for patients with diverticular peritonitis? A systematic review

PURPOSE

This systematic literature review was designed to summarize and compare the reported outcomes of one-stage and two-stage operations for the treatment of perforated diverticulitis with peritonitis.

METHODS

This review identified 98 published studies (1957-2003) dealing with the surgical management of perforated diverticulitis with peritonitis, either with primary resection and anastomosis or with the Hartmann's procedure. Aggregated results of adverse outcomes were calculated but statistical comparisons were not appropriate because of data and design heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Operative mortality data from patients with diverticular peritonitis undergoing Hartmann's procedure (n = 1,051) were derived from 54 studies. Considering the Hartmann's procedure and its reversal procedures together, the mortality rate was 19.6 percent (18.8 percent for the Hartmann's procedure and 0.8 percent for its reversal), the wound infection rate was 29.1 percent (24.2 percent for the Hartmann's procedure and 4.9 percent for its reversal), and stoma complications and anastomotic leaks (in the reversal operation) occurred in 10.3 and 4.3 percent, respectively. Of 569 reported cases of primary anastomosis from 50 studies, the aggregated mortality rate was 9.9 (range, 0-75) percent with an anastomotic leak rate of 13.9 (range, 0-60) percent and a wound infection rate of 9.6 (range, 0-26) percent.

CONCLUSIONS

Reported mortality and morbidity in patients with diverticular peritonitis who underwent primary anastomosis were not higher than those in patients undergoing Hartmann's procedure were. This suggests that primary anastomosis is a safe operative alternative in certain patients with peritonitis. Despite inclusion of only patients with peritonitis in this analysis, selection bias may have been a limitation and a prospective, randomized trial is recommended.