Non-aqueous flow-injection determination of atrazine by inhibition of immobilized tyrosinase

Enzymatic assays for the assessment of toxic effects of halogenated organic contaminants in water and food. A review

Halogenated organic compounds are a particular group of contaminants consisting of a large number of substances, and of great concern due to their persistence in the environment, potential for bioaccumulation and toxicity. Some of these compounds have been classified as persistent organic pollutants (POPs) under The Stockholm Convention and many toxicity assessments have been conducted on them previously. In this work we provide an overview of enzymatic assays used in these studies to establish toxic effects and dose-response relationships. Studies in vivo and in vitro have been considered with a particular emphasis on the impact of halogenated compounds on the activity of relevant enzymes to the humans and the environment. Most information available in the literature focuses on chlorinated compounds, but brominated and fluorinated molecules are also the target of increasing numbers of studies. The enzymes identified can be classified as enzymes: i) the activities of which are affected by the presence of halogenated organic compounds, and ii) those involved in their metabolisation/detoxification resulting in increased activities. In both cases the halogen substituent seems to have an important role in the effects observed. Finally, the use of these enzymes in biosensing tools for monitoring of halogenated compounds is described.

Kinetic, spectroscopic and computational docking study of the inhibitory effect of the pesticides 2,4,5-T, 2,4-D and glyphosate on the diphenolase activity of mushroom tyrosinase

The inhibitory effect of 2,4,5-T, 2,4-D, glyphosate and paraquat on the diphenolase activity of mushroom tyrosinase for oxidation of L-DOPA has been investigated by kinetic measurements, fluorescence spectroscopy and computational docking analysis. 2,4,5-T and 2,4-D inhibit the diphenolase activity of the enzyme following a competitive mechanism, while glyphosate is a mixed inhibitor according to Lineweaver-Burk kinetic analysis. The inhibitory activity follows the order glyphosate >2,4,5-T > 2,4-D with IC50 values of 65, 90 and 106 μM, respectively. Intrinsic tyrosinase fluorescence quenching and computational docking analysis suggest that 2,4,5-T and 2,4-D interact with the active site of the enzyme through hydrophobic interactions, while glyphosate also interacts with external residues of the active site of the enzyme by hydrogen bonding and hydrophilic interactions inducing conformational changes in the protein structure.

Effective immobilization of tyrosinase via enzyme catalytic polymerization of l-DOPA for highly sensitive phenol and atrazine sensing

The facile preparation of poly(l-DOPA)-tyrosinase (PDM-Tyr) composite and its application both in substrate (phenol) and inhibitor (atrazine) sensing is reported here for the first time. Effective immobilization of enzyme is realized via in-situ entrapping Tyr in poly(l-DOPA) (PDM), which is formed by Tyr catalytic polymerization of l-DOPA. The Tyr modified electrode is simply prepared by dipping the PDM-Tyr composite on an Au electrode and then covered by Nafion. The thus-prepared Tyr-immobilized electrode exhibits excellent performance superior to most Tyr-based electrochemical biosensors, the sensitivity to phenol is as high as 5122 μA mM(-1) in the linear range of 10nM~1.25 μM, the apparent Michaelis-Menten constant (KM(app)) determined as low as 3.13μM indicates strong substrate binding and high catalytic activity of the immobilized Tyr. The biosensor also works well in atrazine biosensing, with a linear detection range of 50ppb~30ppm and a low detection limit of 10ppb obtained. In addition, the biosensor shows excellent stability, precision, high sensitivity and fabrication simplicity.

Conductometric tyrosinase biosensor for the detection of diuron, atrazine and its main metabolites

The determination of diuron, atrazine, desisopropylatrazine (DIA) and desethylatrazine (DEA) were investigated using conductometric tyrosinase biosensor. Tyrosinase was immobilised on the biosensor sensitive part by allowing it to mix with bovine serum albumin (BSA) and then cross-linking in saturated glutaraldehyde (GA) vapour for 30min. The determination of pollutants in a solution was performed by comparison of the output signal (i.e percentage of the enzymatic activity) of the biosensor before and after contact with pollutants. The measurement of the enzymatic activity was performed using 4-chlorophenol, phenol and catechol substrates and response times ranging from 1 to 5min were observed. A 4-chlorophenol substrate was used to detect pesticides. A 30min contact time of the biosensor in the pollutant solution was used. Under the experimental conditions employed, detection limits for diuron and atrazine were about 1ppb and dynamic range of 2.3-2330 and 2.15-2150ppb were obtained for diuron and atrazine, respectively. A relative standard deviation (n=3) of the output signal was estimated to be 5% and a slight drift of 1.5muSh(-1) was observed. The 90% of the enzyme activity was still maintained after 23 days of storage in a buffer solution at 4 degrees C.

Simultaneous spectrophotometric determination of atrazine and cyanazine by chemometric methods

A spectrophotometric method for the simultaneous determination of two herbicides, atrazine and cyanazine, is described for the first time based on their reaction with p-aminoacetophenone in the presence of pyridine in hydrochloric acid medium. The absorption spectra were measured in the wavelength range of 400-600 nm. The optimized method indicated that individual analytes followed Beer's law in the concentration ranges for atrazine and cyanazine were 0.2-3.5 mg L(-1) and 0.3-5.0 mg L(-1), and the limits of detection for atrazine and cyanazine were 0.099 and 0.15 mg L(-1), respectively. The original and first-derivative absorption spectra of the binary mixtures were performed as a pre-treatment on the calibration matrices prior to the application of chemometric models such as classical least squares (CLS), principal component regression (PCR), partial least squares (PLS). The analytical results obtained by using these chemometric methods were evaluated on the basis of percent relative prediction error and recovery. It was found that the application of PCR and PLS models for first-derivative absorbance data gave the satisfactory results. The proposed methods were successfully applied for the simultaneous determination of the two herbicides in several food samples.

Review on the use of enzymes for the detection of organochlorine, organophosphate and carbamate pesticides in the environment

Pesticides are released intentionally into the environment and, through various processes, contaminate the environment. Three of the main classes of pesticides that pose a serious problem are organochlorines, organophosphates and carbamates. While pesticides are associated with many health effects, there is a lack of monitoring data on these contaminants. Traditional chromatographic methods are effective for the analysis of pesticides in the environment, but have limitations and prevent adequate monitoring. Enzymatic methods have been promoted for many years as an alternative method of detection of these pesticides. The main enzymes that have been utilised in this regard have been acetylcholinesterase, butyrylcholinesterase, alkaline phosphatase, organophosphorus hydrolase and tyrosinase. The enzymatic methods are based on the activation or inhibition of the enzyme by a pesticide which is proportional to the concentration of the pesticide. Research on enzymatic methods of detection, as well as some of the problems and challenges associated with these methods, is extensively discussed in this review. These methods can serve as a tool for screening large samples which can be followed up with the more traditional chromatographic methods of analysis.

Enzyme inhibition-based biosensors and biosensing systems: questionable analytical devices

An overview of methods based on enzyme inhibition is presented. Both biosensors and biosensing systems (implemented in continuous and discontinuous approaches) are considered. The aim of the overview is to alert users on the use of these devices which, despite they can involve selective biocatalysts, the inhibition effect is not selective. Tables and examples illustrate this assertion.