Concepts in vertebrate neuroethology

A gyroscopic advantage: phylogenetic patterns of compensatory movements in frogs

Head and eye compensatory movements known as vestibulo-ocular and vestibulo-cervical reflexes are essential to stay orientated in space while moving. We have used a previously developed methodology focused on the detailed mathematical description of head compensatory movements in frogs without the need for any surgical procedures on the examined specimens. Our comparative study comprising 35 species of frogs from different phylogenetic backgrounds revealed species-specific head compensatory abilities ensuring gaze stabilization. Moreover, we found a strong phylogenetic signal highlighting the great ability of compensatory head movements in families of Pyxicephalidae and Rhacophoridae from the Natatanura group. By contrast, families of Dendrobatidae and Microhylidae exhibited only poor or no head compensatory movements. Contrary to our expectation, the results did not corroborate an ecomorphological hypothesis anticipating a close relationship between ecological parameters and the head compensatory movements. We did not find any positive association between more complex (3D structured, arboreal or aquatic) habitats or more saltatory behavior and elevated abilities of head compensatory movements. Moreover, we found compensatory movements in most basal Archeobatrachia, giving an indication of common ancestry of these abilities in frogs that are variously pronounced in particular families. We hypothesize that the uncovered proper gaze stabilization during locomotion provided by the higher head compensatory abilities can improve or even enable visual perception of the prey. We interpret this completely novel finding as a possible gyroscopic advantage in a foraging context. We discuss putative consequences of such advanced neuromotor skills for diversification and ecological success of the Natatanura group.

The mesencephalic GCt-ICo complex and tonic immobility in pigeons (Columba livia): a c-Fos study

Tonic immobility (TI) is a response to a predator attack, or other inescapable danger, characterized by immobility, analgesia and unresponsiveness to external stimuli. In mammals, the periaqueductal gray (PAG) and deep tectal regions control the expression of TI as well as other defensive behaviors. In birds, little is known about the mesencephalic circuitry involved in the control of TI. Here, adult pigeons (both sex, n = 4/group), randomly assigned to non-handled, handled or TI groups, were killed 90 min after manipulations and the brains processed for detection of c-Fos immunoreactive cells (c-Fos-ir, marker for neural activity) in the mesencephalic central gray (GCt) and the adjacent nucleus intercollicularis (ICo). The NADPH-diaphorase staining delineated the boundaries of the sub nuclei in the ICo-GCt complex. Compared to non-handled, TI (but not handling) induced c-Fos-ir in NADPH-diaphorase-rich and -poor regions. After TI, the number of c-Fos-ir increased in the caudal and intermediate areas of the ICo (but not in the GCt), throughout the rostrocaudal axis of the dorsal stratum griseum periventriculare (SGPd) of the optic tectum and in the n. mesencephalicus lateralis pars dorsalis (MLd), which is part of the ascending auditory pathway. These data suggest that inescapable threatening stimuli such as TI may recruit neurons in discrete areas of ICo-GCt complex, deep tectal layer and in ascending auditory circuits that may control the expression of defensive behaviors in pigeons. Additionally, data indicate that the contiguous deep tectal SCPd (but not GCt) in birds may be functionally comparable to the mammalian dorsal PAG.

Neuroethology of releasing mechanisms: Prey-catching in toads

“Sign stimuli” elicit specific patterns of behavior when an organism's motivation is appropriate. In the toad, visually released prey-catching involves orienting toward the prey, approaching, fixating, and snapping. For these action patterns to be selected and released, the prey must be recognized and localized in space. Toads discriminate prey from nonprey by certain spatiotemporal stimulus features. The stimulus-response relations are mediated by innate releasing mechanisms (RMs) with recognition properties partly modifiable by experience. Striato-pretecto-tectal connectivity determines the RM's recognition and localization properties, whereas medialpallio-thalamo-tectal circuitry makes the system sensitive to changes in internal state and to prior history of exposure to stimuli. RMs encode the diverse stimulus conditions referring to the same prey object through different combinations of “specialized” tectal neurons, involving cells selectively tuned to prey features. The prey-selective neurons express the outcome of information processing in functional units consisting of interconnected cells. Excitatory and inhibitory interactions among feature-sensitive tectal and pretectal neurons specify the perceptual operations involved in distinguishing the prey from its background, selecting its features, and discriminating it from predators. Other connections indicate stimulus location. The results of these analyses are transmitted by specialized neurons projecting from the tectum to bulbar/spinal motor systems, providing a sensorimotor interface. Specific combinations of such projective neurons – mediating feature- and space-related messages – form “command releasing systems” that activate corresponding motor pattern generators for appropriate prey-catching action patterns.

Relationships between the superior colliculus and hippocampus: Neural and behavioral considerations

Theories of superior collicular and hippocampal function have remarkable similarities. Both structures have been repeatedly implicated in spatial and attentional behaviour and in inhibitory control of locomotion. Moreover, they share certain electrophysiological properties in their single unit responses and in the synchronous appearance and disappearance of slow wave activity. Both are phylogenetically old and the colliculus projects strongly to brainstem nuclei instrumental in the generation of theta rhythm in the hippocampal EEC

On the other hand, close inspection of behavioural and electrophysiological data reveals disparities. In particular, hippocampal processing mainly concerns stimulus ambiguity, contextual significance, and spatial relations or other subtle, higher order characteristics. This requires the use of largely preprocessed sensory information and mediation of poststimulus investigation. Although collicular activity must also be integrated with that of “higher” centres (probably to a varying degree, depending on the nature of stimuli being processed and the task requirements), its primary role in attention is more “peripheral” and specific in controlling orienting/localisation via eye and body movements toward egocentrically labelled spatial positions. In addition, the colliculus may exert a nonspecific influence in alerting higher centres to the imminence of information potentially worthy of focal attention. Nevertheless, it is noteworthy that collicular and hippocampal lesions produce deficits on similar tasks, although the type of deficit is usually different (often opposite) in each case. Functional overlap between hippocampus and colliculus (i.e., strategically synchronised or mutually interdependent activity) is virtually certain vis-à-vis stimulus sampling, for example in the acquisition of information via vibrissal movements and visual scanning. In addition, insofar as stimulus significance is a factor in collicular orienting mechanisms, the hippocampus — cingulate – cortex — colliculus pathway may play a significant role, modulating collicular responsiveness and thus ensuring an attentional strategy appropriate to current requirements (stimulus familiarity, stage of learning). A tentative “reciprocal loop” model is proposed which bridges physiological and behavioural levels of analysis and which would account for the observed degree and nature of functional overlap between the superior colliculus and hippocampus.

Spatial distribution of a fusiform cell in the optic tectum of Pantodon buchholzi, the African butterfly fish (Teleostei, Osteoglossomorpha)

Pantodon buchholzi, the African butterfly fish, inhabits an ecological niche just below the water surface. At that position, each eye necessarily views into the air through the surface of the water and into the water. Since Pantodon is an obligatory surface feeder, the ventral retina viewing the aerial environment provides all visual information for prey acquisition. The visual pathway of this fish reflects the divided visual field with structural differences in the retina and brain corresponding to the different views. In this study, we describe a specific type of neuron in the tectum that, due to its intrinsic structure, likely integrates visual and mechanoreceptor inputs. Because of its spatial distribution, this type of neuron is a candidate as a basic element in a network involved with prey acquisition.

Functional specializations within the tectum defense systems of the rat

Here we review the differential contribution of the periaqueductal gray matter (PAG) and superior colliculus (SC) to the generation of rat defensive behaviors. The results of studies involving sine-wave and rectangular pulse electrical stimulation and chemical (NMDA) stimulation are summarized. Stimulation of SC and PAG produced freezing and flight behaviors along with exophthalmus (fully opened bulged eyes), micturition and defecation. The columnar organization of the PAG was evident in the results obtained. Defecation was elicited primarily by lateral PAG stimulation, while the remaining defensive behaviors were similarly elicited by lateral and dorsolateral PAG stimulation, although with the lowest thresholds in the dorsolateral column. Conversely, the ventrolateral PAG did not appear to participate in unconditioned defensive behaviors, which were only elicited by high intensity stimulation likely to encroach on adjacent regions. In the SC, the most important differences relative to the PAG were the lack of stimulation-evoked jumping in both intermediate and deep layers, and of NMDA-evoked galloping in intermediate layers. Therefore, we conclude that the SC may be only involved in the increased attentiveness (exophthalmus, immobility) and restlessness (trotting) of prey species exposed to the cues of a nearby predator. These responses may be distinct from the full-blown flight reaction that is mediated by the dorsolateral and lateral PAG. However, other evidences suggest the possible influences of stimulation schedule, environment dimensions and rat strain in determining outcomes. Overall our results suggest a dynamically organized representation of defensive behaviors in the midbrain tectum.

Effect of early feeding experience on subsequent prey preference by cuttlefish,Sepia officinalis

Food preferences were investigated in cuttlefish during the first 3 months' posthatching, using choice tests between crabs, shrimps, and young fish. The results showed that without previous feeding experience, cuttlefish preferred shrimps on Day 3. This suggests an innate food preference; however, it was possible to induce a preference for an originally nonpreferred prey item in 3-day-old and naïve cuttlefish, demonstrating the flexibility of this initial behavioral preference in response to previous individual experience. This preference suggests a learning process involving a form of long-term memory, demonstrated for the first time in juvenile cuttlefish. Until Day 30, juvenile cuttlefish fed exclusively shrimps chose shrimps. This preference probably depends on their previous feeding experience. Finally, it appears that from Day 60, cuttlefish reared on the same restricted diet have a tendency to switch their preference to novel prey items, which diversify their diet.

A key by which the toad's visual system gets access to the domain of prey

Searching for principles that allow toads to distinguish between prey and nonprey, we wondered how the toad's prey-catching activity measured as R differs in response to changes in significant configurational stimulus features. Elongated shapes moving worm-like in the direction of their longer axes are preferred prey dummies; but a toad is not a worm detector, and a worm is not the unique prey-catching releaser. Considering the frequency distributions of R values, we show that the release of prey catching is in a specific manner sensitive to the relation between the extensions of an object parallel (xl1) and perpendicular (xl2) to its direction of movement. It is the xl1 and xl2 features-relating algorithm that provides the key (instruction) by which the toad's visual system gets access to the domain of potential prey in terms of configurational cues. This, within behaviorally relevant limits, largely invariant algorithm also holds for segmented stimuli. Further investigations show that this principle of object discrimination is not due to experimental procedures but emerges as a species-common property, of which different toad species take advantage in a species-specific manner. Neurobiological correlates are discussed.

Caveats in the study of perinatal behavioral development: utility of fetal study

Study of behavior during development presents psychobiologists and neurobiologists with a unique set of problems that should be addressed in the design and analysis of experiments. Some of these caveats have become apparent only with the recent growth in research with subjects around the time of birth. For example, physiological regulation within the maternal-infant dyad, litter effects, the influence of context at the time of testing on performance, and dissociation of age-related change and experience, all are important experimental considerations in developmental study. Manipulation and measurement of behavioral variables in the fetus in vivo can provide one means for circumventing many of the methodological pitfalls that are associated with behavioral study of newborn subjects.

[Neural and ethological relations in the evaluation of motor control changes. I. Neural substrates of motricity]

Movement is the final expression of the harmonious activation of multiple brain and muscle systems. In nature, movement measures primary responses of profound adaptative value such as reproduction, predation and flight, among others. The description of movements as motor acts or patterns was first the task of Ethology. With the recent advances in the Neurosciences, a neuro-ethological approach is proposed today for research in this area. When dysfunctions in motion occur, practically the same brain and muscle systems are utilized, but in an aberrant manner both in time and space. In the present review, we illustrate the major systems involved in normal motor control, in particular the cortex, basal ganglia, cerebellum, brain stem, medulla, and receptor and effector muscle periphery.

Neuronal organization underlying visually elicited prey orienting in the frog--III. Evidence for the existence of an uncrossed descending tectofugal pathway

A complete transverse hemisection of the neuraxis just caudal to the optic tectum in the frog, Rana pipiens, results in a failure to orient toward stimuli in one visual hemifield [Kostyk and Grobstein (1986) Neuroscience 21, 41-55]. This finding indicates that each tectal lobe gives rise to a crossed descending pathway adequate to cause turns in a direction contralateral to that tectal lobe, and suggests that each may also give rise to an uncrossed descending pathway adequate to cause turns in the ipsilateral direction. To determine whether there is in fact such an uncrossed pathway, we have studied the orienting behavior of frogs after lesions which interrupt crossed pathways. Two groups of animals were studied. In one group we made midline lesions of the ansulate commissure, through which run the major crossed descending projections from both tectal lobes. In the other group, we combined a complete transverse hemisection with removal of the tectal lobe on the same side of the brain, leaving intact only an uncrossed pathway from one tectal lobe. A persistence of orienting turns was observed in both groups of animals. In both, the direction of the turns was that expected on the assumption that an uncrossed pathway would cause ipsilateral turns. We conclude that such a pathway exists. While both groups of animals turned in the expected directions, they did so for stimuli at unexpected locations. Increasingly eccentric stimulus locations to one side of the mid-sagittal plane were associated with increasing amplitude turns to the other. The observation suggests that tectal regions mapping areas of visual space to one side of the mid-sagittal plane are capable of triggering turns not only in that direction but in the opposite direction as well. In the case of ansulate commissure section, mirrored orienting responses were observed for tactile stimuli as well. These and other behavioral anomalies described in the preceding papers [Kostyk and Grobstein (1986) Neuroscience 21, 41-55 and 57-82] suggest that between the topographic retinotectal projection and the premotor circuitry for orienting there may exist an intermediate processing step, one in which stimulus location is represented in a generalized spatial coordinate frame.