Postoperative adjuvant therapy for stage II non-small-cell lung cancer

Temporal and regional distribution of initial recurrence site in completely resected N1-stage II lung adenocarcinoma: The effect of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy

OBJECTIVES

Understanding the timing and pattern of cancer recurrence is essential to explain the causes of treatment failure. We investigated the recurrence pattern and rate over time in patients with completely resected N1-stage II lung adenocarcinoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 333 patients who underwent complete surgical resection for N1-stage II lung adenocarcinoma.

RESULTS

The median recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 38.8 months and the 5-year RFS rate was 39.6%. Left-sided tumors, large tumor size, and lymph node (LN) ratio higher than 0.15 were significantly correlated with a worse RFS, whereas female sex, direct LN involvement, and adjuvant chemotherapy were significantly correlated with a better RFS. Among the 182 patients who experienced recurrences, 46 (25.3%) had only loco-regional recurrences and 136 (74.7%) had distant metastases. The organs most commonly involved in initial recurrence were the lungs (n = 89, 48.9%), followed by bone (n = 41, 22.5%) and the brain (n = 38, 20.9%). The recurrence hazard curve for the entire study population demonstrated a similarly shaped and sized initial and second peak at 15 and 23 months, and a third smaller peak during the fourth year. The recurrence hazard curve of patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy exhibited a more delayed and smaller first peak than those who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy. The patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy had a lower rate of distant metastasis (p = 0.037); adjuvant chemotherapy had no effect on brain metastasis (p = 0.640).

CONCLUSION

In the present cohort, the hazard curves suggested that bone and brain recurrences exhibited an earlier first peak, while lung recurrences presented later. Adjuvant chemotherapy not only reduced the recurrence hazard but also delayed the recurrence and altered the pattern of recurrence. However, these results need to be confirmed in a prospective study.

Preoperative versus postoperative chemotherapy in patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer: systematic review and indirect comparison meta-analysis of randomized trials

INTRODUCTION

A large number of trials have evaluated the efficacy of postoperative chemotherapy on survival after resection for lung cancer, and a smaller number have evaluated preoperative chemotherapy on survival for potentially resectable lung cancer, but no direct comparison has yet been published comparing the two approaches.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of randomized trials, extracted time-to-event data using Parmar methods (when not reported), used random effects meta-analysis to evaluate overall and disease survival treatment effects and performed indirect comparison meta-analysis to obtain the relative hazards of postoperative to preoperative administration on survival.

RESULTS

Data were abstracted from 32 randomized trials involving more than 10,000 participants, with 22 trials administering postoperative and 10 trials administering preoperative chemotherapy. For overall survival, the hazard ratios were 0.80 (0.74-0.87; p < 0.001) and 0.81 (0.68-0.97; p = 0.024) in postoperative chemotherapy group and preoperative chemotherapy group, respectively. Using indirect comparison meta-analysis, the relative hazards of postoperative compared with preoperative administration was 0.99 (0.81-1.21; p = 0.91). For disease-free survival, the hazard ratios were 0.76 (0.67-0.86; p < 0.001) and 0.79 (0.63 to 1.00; P = 0.050) in postoperative chemotherapy group and preoperative chemotherapy group, respectively. Using indirect comparison meta-analysis, the relative hazards of postoperative compared with preoperative administration was 0.96 (0.77-1.20; p = 0.70).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with resectable lung cancer, there was no evidence of a difference in overall and disease-free survival between the timing of administration of chemotherapy (postoperative versus preoperative).

Evaluation of Nutritional Status in Cancer Patients Receiving Radiotherapy

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the nutritional status of cancer patients receiving radiotherapy (RT) and to assess the possible contributions of nutritional support to patients with malnutrition.

METHODS

Prospectively, 207 patients referred to our outpatient radiotherapy department were included. The patients were classified according to tumor site (head/neck, breast, lung, stomach, or colorectal). Nutritional status at the onset, at the end of RT, and 3 and 6 months after irradiation was evaluated with the subjective global assessment (SGA). All of the patients were supported with additional portions of meal or standard enteral feeding formula during and after the irradiation period as long as they were in the moderately or severely malnourished groups, respectively.

RESULTS

At the onset, malnutrition was present in 31% of all patients, and it increased to 43% at the end of RT. This difference predominated in head/neck cancer patients. Malnutrition ratios in head/neck cancer patients at the onset and after RT were 24% and 88%, respectively. By a 6-month follow-up, the ratio of patients with malnutrition decreased to 8%. Nutritional status of all groups was found to improve during the 6-month follow-up period, except for the breast cancer group, which included no patients with severe malnutrition at any time.

CONCLUSION

The results of the present study may be helpful in planning an appropriate nutritional support for cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy according to the irradiation site.

A randomized trial of postoperative UFT therapy in p stage I, II non-small cell lung cancer: North-east Japan Study Group for Lung Cancer Surgery

OBJECTIVE

A prospective randomized trial was performed to investigate the prognostic advantage of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with resected stage I-II non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From March 1992 to December 1994, 221 patients with completely resected stage I-II primary NSCLC were enrolled and randomly assigned to two groups, as follows: 2-year oral administration of Uracil plus Tegafur (UFT) (adjuvant group, 109 patients), and surgical treatment alone (control group, 110 patients).

RESULTS

The overall 5-year survival rates were 79% for the adjuvant group and 75% for the control group, and there was no statistical significance. The 5-year disease-free survival rates were 78% for the adjuvant group and 71% for the control group, and there was also no statistical significance. There have been seen no severe complications in the adjuvant group. The mean total dosages of UFT were about 75% of maximum basic amount.

CONCLUSIONS

The UFT regimen was feasible. However, we have not observed any survival benefit in the adjuvant group. Larger trials are needed to confirm the effect of UFT to patients with resected NSCLC.

Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for stage II and III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

The role of postoperative adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy in the treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unclear. This study was undertaken to evaluate the survival outcomes, relapse patterns, prognostic factors and complications of postoperative adjuvant MVP chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The study involved some 96 patients who had undergone curative resection of stage II and III NSCLC between 1991 and 1996. Among these, 94 patients who completed their adjuvant treatment were analyzed. Surgery consisted of pneumonectomy (33%), single lobectomy (54%) or bilobectomy (13%). Within 4 weeks of curative resection, two cycles of MVP chemotherapy (mitomycinC 8 mg/m(2), vinblastine 8 mg/m(2), cisplatin 60 mg/m(2)) were started at 4 weeks intervals. Conventionally fractionated radiotherapy was given 3 weeks after chemotherapy to a total dose of 50 Gy in completely resected patients and 55-60 Gy in patients with positive resection margins. The TNM classification of the AJCC, as revised in 1997, was used for pathologic staging. The number of patients at AJCC stages IIa, IIb, IIIa, and IIIb were four, 40, 45, and five, respectively. A pathologically positive bronchial resection margin was found in nine patients. At the time of analysis, death was recorded in 29 patients (31%), though five had died without evidence of lung cancer. Overall 2, 3, and 5-year-survival rates for all patients were 74.2, 70.2, and 65%, respectively, and locoregional disease-free survival (LRDFS) rates were 88.6, 83.7, 74.3%, at 2, 3, and 5-years, distant metastasis disease-free survival (DMDFS) rates were 67.7, 65.0, and 63.6%, respectively. In the multivariate model, a primary tumor size of more than 5 cm and the level of pathologically positive nodes were found to be associated with poor overall survival, LRDFS and DMDFS. Although positive bronchial resection margin affected overall survival, LRDFS and DMDFS were unaffected. With respect to the first site of relapse, distant metastasis occurred more frequently (N=33, 35%) than locoregional recurrence (N=15, 16%). Grade 3 esophagitis in two patients and weight loss of more than 10% in five patients were observed during adjuvant treatment. Grade 4 pulmonary toxicity was observed in one patient after radiotherapy and this patient ultimately died 5 months after treatment. The postoperative adjuvant MVP chemotherapy and radiotherapy regimen showed relatively low locoregional recurrence and distant metastasis rates and good survival with acceptable toxicity. A prospective randomized trial, which compares this regimen to surgery alone or postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy is needed.

Therapy for stage I and stage II non-small cell lung cancer

Despite complete resection of what seems to be all evident tumor, one third to three quarters of patients with stages I and II NSCLC ultimately succumb to this neoplasm. Patients who are cured of an original NSCLC or small cell cancer remain at risk for a new primary lung cancer. Although the importance of lifelong surveillance is clear, the extent and timing of optimal follow-up remain undefined. Although clinicians refer to the development after treatment of clinically discernible sites of tumor as "recurrence," it is probably more accurate to consider these foci as "persistence"--that is, the locoregional site was not sterilized by surgery, and the distant implants were present from the outset but undetected. Although data are sparse, induction and improved adjuvant therapy for early NSCLC may be helpful. Much further experience is needed. Further study and application of biologic indicators in addition to TNM staging likely will help identify patients at high risk for surgical failure who may benefit by combination treatment.

The role of chemotherapy in early non-small-cell lung cancer management

Great advances have been made in chemotherapy in advanced and metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and a major milestone was reached with the administration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage IIIA N2 disease. The systemic nature of lung cancer has been confirmed by many genetic analyses documenting micrometastases in negative lymph nodes and bone marrow, and mRNA gene overexpression as a surrogate of cancer cells has been identified in peripheral blood. Furthermore, serum or plasma cell-free tumor DNA has been observed even in tumors with a diameter of less than 2 cm. Pharmacogenetic screening can lead to tailored chemotherapy even in patients with early disease through the use of a genetic tool kit that will allow us to optimize the use of chemotherapy by using serial measurements of serum DNA that can help to detect residual disease and re-assess the chemosensitivity of sub-clinical micrometastatic disease. The ongoing (neo)adjuvant taxol/carboplatin hope (NATCH) trial is testing the value of three cycles of chemotherapy given pre- or post-operatively compared with surgery alone and will analyze genetic abnormalities in serum DNA at three different points during patient follow-up. Our major concern in this review is to analyze the pros and cons of chemotherapy in NSCLC. Although this review is not a formal meta-analysis, we have discussed the most relevant published studies in this field. We conclude that not only is there no evidence of detrimental effects of chemotherapy, in fact, there are many indications that chemotherapy induces response in up to 80% of patients and downgrades N2 disease in up to 50% of patients. This translates into significantly better survival when accompanied by complete resection. Since at least 50% of patients with stage IB disease develop distant metastases, it seems logical to explore the role of chemotherapy in early disease.