Intrastriatal AP5 differentially affects behaviors induced by local infusions of D1 vs. D2 dopamine agonists

Phosphoinositide phosphatases: just as important as the kinases

Phosphoinositide phosphatases comprise several large enzyme families with over 35 mammalian enzymes identified to date that degrade many phosphoinositide signals. Growth factor or insulin stimulation activates the phosphoinositide 3-kinase that phosphorylates phosphatidylinositol (4,5)-bisphosphate [PtdIns(4,5)P(2)] to form phosphatidylinositol (3,4,5)-trisphosphate [PtdIns(3,4,5)P(3)], which is rapidly dephosphorylated either by PTEN (phosphatase and tensin homologue deleted on chromosome 10) to PtdIns(4,5)P(2), or by the 5-phosphatases (inositol polyphosphate 5-phosphatases), generating PtdIns(3,4)P(2). 5-phosphatases also hydrolyze PtdIns(4,5)P(2) forming PtdIns(4)P. Ten mammalian 5-phosphatases have been identified, which regulate hematopoietic cell proliferation, synaptic vesicle recycling, insulin signaling, and embryonic development. Two 5-phosphatase genes, OCRL and INPP5E are mutated in Lowe and Joubert syndrome respectively. SHIP [SH2 (Src homology 2)-domain inositol phosphatase] 2, and SKIP (skeletal muscle- and kidney-enriched inositol phosphatase) negatively regulate insulin signaling and glucose homeostasis. SHIP2 polymorphisms are associated with a predisposition to insulin resistance. SHIP1 controls hematopoietic cell proliferation and is mutated in some leukemias. The inositol polyphosphate 4-phosphatases, INPP4A and INPP4B degrade PtdIns(3,4)P(2) to PtdIns(3)P and regulate neuroexcitatory cell death, or act as a tumor suppressor in breast cancer respectively. The Sac phosphatases degrade multiple phosphoinositides, such as PtdIns(3)P, PtdIns(4)P, PtdIns(5)P and PtdIns(3,5)P(2) to form PtdIns. Mutation in the Sac phosphatase gene, FIG4, leads to a degenerative neuropathy. Therefore the phosphatases, like the lipid kinases, play major roles in regulating cellular functions and their mutation or altered expression leads to many human diseases.

Towards a reconceptualization of striatal interactions between glutamatergic and dopaminergic neurotransmission and their contribution to the production of movements

According to the current model of the basal ganglia organization, simultaneous activation of the striato-nigral direct pathway by glutamatergic and dopaminergic neurotransmission should lead to a synergistic facilitatory action on locomotor activity, while in contrast activation of the indirect pathway by these two neurotransmittions should lead to antagonistic effects on locomotor activity. Based on published data, as a break with the current thinking, we propose a reconceptualization of functional interactions between dopaminergic and glutamatergic neurotransmission. In this model, dopaminergic neurotransmission is seen as a motor pacemaker responsible for the basal and primary activation of striatal output neurons and glutamate as a driver providing a multiple combination of tonic, phasic, facilitatory and inhibitory influxes resulting from the processing of environmental, emotional and mnesic stimuli. Thus, in the model, glutamate-coded inputs would allow tuning the intrinsic motor-activating properties of dopamine to adjust the production of locomotor activity into goal-oriented movements.

Striatal dopamine and glutamate receptors modulate methamphetamine-induced cortical Fos expression

Methamphetamine (mAMPH) is a psychostimulant drug that increases extracellular levels of monoamines throughout the brain. It has previously been observed that a single injection of mAMPH increases immediate early gene (IEG) expression in both the striatum and cerebral cortex. Moreover, this effect is modulated by dopamine and glutamate receptors since systemic administration of dopamine or glutamate antagonists has been found to alter mAMPH-induced striatal and cortical IEG expression. However, because dopamine and glutamate receptors are found in extra-striatal as well as striatal brain regions, studies employing systemic injection of dopamine or glutamate antagonists fail to localize the effects of mAMPH-induced activation. In the present experiments, the roles of striatal dopamine and glutamate receptors in mAMPH-induced gene expression in the striatum and cerebral cortex were examined. The nuclear expression of Fos, the protein product of the IEG c-fos, was quantified in both the striatum and the cortex of animals receiving intrastriatal dopamine or glutamate antagonist administration. Intrastriatal infusion of dopamine (D1 or D2) or glutamate [N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA) or alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA)] antagonists affected not only mAMPH-induced striatal, but also cortical, Fos expression. Overall, the effects of the antagonists occurred dose-dependently, in both the infused and non-infused hemispheres, with greater influences occurring in the infused hemisphere. Finally, unilateral intrastriatal infusion of dopamine or glutamate antagonists changed the behavior of the rats from characteristic mAMPH-induced stereotypy to rotation ipsilateral to the infusion. These results demonstrate that mAMPH's actions on striatal dopamine and glutamate receptors modulate the widespread cortical activation induced by mAMPH. It is hypothesized that dopamine release from nigrostriatal terminals modulates activity within striatal efferent pathways, thereby disinhibiting thalamo-cortical circuits. By extension, these results suggest processes through which repeated exposure to mAMPH might influence cortical function in mAMPH abusers.

Expression and function of CB1 receptor in the rat striatum: localization and effects on D1 and D2 dopamine receptor-mediated motor behaviors

Cannabinoid CB1 receptors are densely expressed on striatal projection neurons expressing dopamine D1 or D2 receptors. However, the specific neuronal distribution of CB1 receptors within the striatum is not known. Previous research has established that the endocannabinoid system controls facilitation of behavior by dopamine D2 receptors, but it is not clear if endocannabinoids also modulate D1 receptor-mediated motor behavior. In the present study, we show that cannabinoid CB1 receptor mRNA is present in striatonigral neurons expressing substance P and dopamine D1 receptors, as well as in striatopallidal neurons expressing enkephalin and dopamine D2 receptors. We explored the functional relevance of the interaction between dopamine D1 and D2 receptors and cannabinoid CB1 receptors with behavioral pharmacology experiments. Potentiation of endogenous cannabinoid signaling by the uptake blocker AM404 blocked dopamine D1 receptor-mediated grooming and D2 receptor-mediated oral stereotypies. In addition, contralateral turning induced by unilateral intrastriatal infusion of D1 receptor agonists is counteracted by AM404 and potentiated by the cannabinoid antagonist SR141716A. These results indicate that the endocannabinoid system negatively modulates D1 receptor-mediated behaviors in addition to its previously described effect on dopamine D2 receptor-mediated behaviors. The effect of AM404 on grooming behavior was absent in dopamine D1 receptor knockout mice, demonstrating its dependence on D1 receptors. This study indicates that the endocannabinoid system is a relevant negative modulator of both dopamine D1 and D2 receptor-mediated behaviors, a finding that may contribute to our understanding of basal ganglia motor disorders.

The contribution of NMDA receptors in the dorsolateral striatum to egocentric response learning

The present study examined the effects of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) competitive antagonist, 2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoic acid (AP-5), injected into the dorsolateral striatum on the acquisition and reversal learning of a response discrimination. Male Long-Evans rats were tested across 2 consecutive days in a modified cross-maze. An infusion of either saline or AP-5 (5 or 25 nM) occurred 5 min prior to testing. In acquisition rats learned to turn left or right. In reversal learning rats learned to turn in the opposite direction. An AP-5 infusion at 25 nmol, but not 5 nmol, impaired response acquisition. Neither AP-5 dose impaired response reversal learning. The results suggest that NMDA receptors in the dorsolateral striatum are critical for the initial learning of an egocentric response discrimination.

Dopamine-glutamate reciprocal modulation of release and motor responses in the rat caudate-putamen and nucleus accumbens of "intact" animals

Functional interactions between dopaminergic neurotransmission and glutamatergic neurotransmission are well known to play a crucial integrative role in the striatum, the major input structure of the basal ganglia now widely recognized to contribute to the control of motor activity and movements but also to the processing of cognitive and limbic functions. However, the nature of these interactions is still a matter of debate and controversy. This review (1) summarizes anatomical data on the distribution of dopaminergic and glutamatergic receptors in the striatum-accumbens complex, (2) focuses on the dopamine-glutamate interactions in the modulation of each other's release in the striatum-accumbens complex, and (3) examines the dopamine-glutamate interactions in the entire striatum involved in the control of locomotor activity. The effects of dopaminergic and glutamatergic receptor selective agonists and antagonists on dopamine and glutamate release as well on motor responses are analyzed in the entire striatum, by reviewing both in vitro and in vivo data. Regarding in vivo data, only findings from focal injections studies in the nucleus accumbens or the caudate-putamen of "intact" animals are reviewed. Altogether, the available data demonstrate that dopamine and glutamate do not uniformly interact to modulate each others' release and postsynaptic modulation of striatal output neurons. Depending on the receptor subtypes involved, interactions between dopaminergic and glutamatergic transmission vary as a multiple and complex combination of tonic, phasic, facilitatory, and inhibitory properties.

Regulation of NMDA-stimulated [14C]GABA and [3H]acetylcholine release by striatal glutamate and dopamine receptors

Striatal function is heavily influenced by glutamatergic and dopaminergic afferent input. To ultimately better understand how the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonist, phencyclidine (PCP), alters striatal function, we sought to determine how NMDA receptor function is influenced by activation of other glutamatergic receptors and by dopaminergic receptors. To this end, we used NMDA-stimulated efflux of [14C]GABA and [3H]acetylcholine (ACh) from striatal slices to assess the influence of these receptors on NMDA function. NMDA-stimulated [14C]GABA release was more sensitive to NMDA and glycine antagonists than was [3H]ACh release, suggesting that different NMDA receptors regulate the release of these neurotransmitters. Furthermore, NMDA-stimulated [3H]ACh release was inhibited by a D2 receptor mechanism whereas NMDA-stimulated [14C]GABA release was enhanced by D1 receptor activation. NMDA and (+/-)-alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-propionic acid hydrobromide (AMPA) interact additively to evoke [3H]ACh release, and synergistically to evoke [14C]GABA release. An additive effect of NMDA and kainate (KA) was found on [14C]GABA release, but NMDA and KA acted in a less than additive manner in evoking [3H]ACh release. KA-stimulated [3H]ACh release was largely blocked by NMDA antagonists, suggesting mediation through activation of NMDA receptors, probably secondary to KA-induced glutamate release. A selective group II metabotropic receptor agonist inhibited NMDA-stimulated [14C]GABA and [3H]ACh release. On the other hand, NMDA-stimulated [14C]GABA release was potentiated by activation of group I metabotropic receptors. Thus, in addition to the differential modulation by D1- and D2-like receptors, the release of striatal neurotransmitters by NMDA receptor activation depends on the extent to which the other glutamate receptors, both ionotropic and metabotropic, are activated.