Suppression by topiramate of epileptiform burst discharges in hippocampal CA3 neurons of spontaneously epileptic rat in vitro

Topiramate for juvenile myoclonic epilepsy

BACKGROUND

Topiramate is a newer broad-spectrum antiepileptic drug (AED). Some studies have shown the benefits of topiramate in the treatment of juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME). However, there are no current systematic reviews to determine the efficacy and tolerability of topiramate in people with JME. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2015, and last updated in 2019.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of topiramate in the treatment of JME.

SEARCH METHODS

For the latest update, we searched the Cochrane Register of Studies (CRS Web) on 26 August 2021, and MEDLINE (Ovid 1946 to 26 August 2021). CRS Web includes randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials from PubMed, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and the Specialized Registers of Cochrane Review Groups, including Cochrane Epilepsy.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating topiramate versus placebo or other AED treatment for people with JME, with the outcomes of proportion of responders and proportion of participants experiencing adverse events (AEs).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened the titles and abstracts of identified records, selected studies for inclusion, extracted data, cross-checked the data for accuracy and assessed the methodological quality of the studies.

MAIN RESULTS

We included three studies with a total of 83 participants. For efficacy, a greater proportion of participants in the topiramate group had a 50% or greater reduction in primarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures (PGTCS), compared with participants in the placebo group (RR 4.00, 95% CI 1.08 to 14.75; 1 study, 22 participants; very low-certainty evidence). There were no significant differences between topiramate and valproate for participants responding with a 50% or greater reduction in myoclonic seizures (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.15; one study, 23 participants; very-low certainty evidence) or in PGTCS (RR 1.22, 95% CI 0.68 to 2.21; one study, 16 participants, very-low certainty evidence), or participants becoming seizure-free (RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.61 to 2.11; one study, 27 participants; very-low certainty evidence). Concerning tolerability, we ranked AEs associated with topiramate as moderate to severe, while we ranked 59% of AEs linked to valproate as severe complaints (2 studies, 61 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Moreover, systemic toxicity scores were higher in the valproate group than the topiramate group. Overall we judged all three studies to be at high risk of attrition bias and at unclear risk of reporting bias. We judged the studies to be at low to unclear risk of bias for the remaining domains (selection bias, performance bias, detection bias and other bias). We judged the overall certainty of the evidence for the outcomes as very low using the GRADE approach.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We have found no new studies since the last version of this review was published in 2019. This review does not provide sufficient evidence to support topiramate for the treatment of people with JME. Based on the current limited available data, topiramate seems to be better tolerated than valproate, but has no clear benefits over valproate in terms of efficacy. Well-designed, double-blind RCTs with large samples are required to test the efficacy and tolerability of topiramate in people with JME.

Topiramate for juvenile myoclonic epilepsy

BACKGROUND

Topiramate is a newer broad-spectrum antiepileptic drug (AED). Some studies have shown the benefits of topiramate in the treatment of juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME). However, there are no current systematic reviews to determine the efficacy and tolerability of topiramate in people with JME. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2015, and last updated in 2017.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of topiramate in the treatment of JME.

SEARCH METHODS

For the latest update, on 10 July 2018 we searched the Cochrane Register of Studies (CRS Web), which includes the Cochrane Epilepsy Group's Specialized Register and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (Ovid 1946- ), and ClinicalTrials.gov. We also searched ongoing trials registers, reference lists and relevant conference proceedings, and contacted study authors and pharmaceutical companies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating topiramate versus placebo or other AED treatment for people with JME, with the outcomes of proportion of responders and proportion of participants experiencing adverse events (AEs).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened the titles and abstracts of identified records, selected studies for inclusion, extracted data, cross-checked the data for accuracy and assessed the methodological quality. We performed no meta-analyses due to the limited available data.

MAIN RESULTS

We included three studies with a total of 83 participants. For efficacy, a greater proportion of participants in the topiramate group had a 50% or more reduction in primarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures (PGTCS) compared with participants in the placebo group. There were no significant differences between topiramate and valproate in participants responding with a 50% or more reduction in myoclonic seizures or in PGTCS, or becoming seizure-free. Concerning tolerability, we ranked AEs associated with topiramate as moderate to severe, while we ranked 59% of AEs linked to valproate as severe complaints. Moreover, systemic toxicity scores were higher in the valproate group than the topiramate group.Overall we judged all three studies to be at high risk of attrition bias and at unclear risk of reporting bias. We judged all three studies to be at low to unclear bias for the remaining risk of bias domains (random sequence, allocation, blinding). We judged the quality of the evidence from the studies to be very low.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We have found no new studies since the last version of this review was published in 2017. This review does not provide sufficient evidence to support topiramate for the treatment of people with JME. Based on the current limited available data, topiramate seems to be better tolerated than valproate, but has no clear benefits over valproate in terms of efficacy. Well-designed, double-blind RCTs with large samples are required to test the efficacy and tolerability of topiramate in people with JME.

Sleep Related Epilepsy and Pharmacotherapy: An Insight

In the last several decades, sleep-related epilepsy has drawn considerable attention among epileptologists and neuroscientists in the interest of new paradigms of the disease etiology, pathogenesis and management. Sleep-related epilepsy is nocturnal seizures that manifest solely during the sleep state. Sleep comprises two distinct stages i.e., non-rapid eye movement (NREM) and rapid eye movement (REM) that alternate every 90 min with NREM preceding REM. Current findings indicate that the sleep-related epilepsy manifests predominantly during the synchronized stages of sleep; NREM over REM stage. Sleep related hypermotor epilepsy (SHE), benign partial epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes or benign rolandic epilepsy (BECTS), and Panayiotopoulos Syndrome (PS) are three of the most frequently implicated epilepsies occurring during the sleep state. Although some familial types are described, others are seemingly sporadic occurrences. In the present review, we aim to discuss the predominance of sleep-related epilepsy during NREM, established familial links to the pathogenesis of SHE, BECTS and PS, and highlight the present available pharmacotherapy options.

Topiramate monotherapy for juvenile myoclonic epilepsy

BACKGROUND

Topiramate is a newer broad-spectrum antiepileptic drug (AED). Some studies have shown the benefits of topiramate monotherapy in the treatment of juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME). However, there are no current systematic reviews to determine the efficacy and tolerability of topiramate monotherapy in people with JME. This is an updated version of the original Cochrane Review published in Issue 12, 2015.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of topiramate monotherapy in the treatment of JME.

SEARCH METHODS

For the latest update, on 21 February 2017 we searched Cochrane Epilepsy's Specialized Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and ClinicalTrials.gov. We also searched ongoing trials registers, reference lists and relevant conference proceedings, and contacted study authors and pharmaceutical companies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating topiramate monotherapy versus placebo or other AED treatment for people with JME, with the outcomes of proportion of responders or experiencing adverse events (AEs).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened the titles and abstracts of identified records, selected studies for inclusion, extracted data, cross-checked the data for accuracy and assessed the methodological quality. We performed no meta-analyses due to the limited available data.

MAIN RESULTS

We included three studies with 83 participants. For efficacy, a greater proportion of participants in the topiramate group had a 50% or more reduction in primarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures (PGTCS) compared with participants in the placebo group. There were no significant differences between topiramate versus valproate in participants responding with a 50% or more reduction in myoclonic seizures or in PGTCS or seizure-free. Concerning tolerability, we ranked AEDs associated with topiramate as moderate-to-severe, while we ranked 59% of AEDs linked to valproate as severe complaints. Moreover, systemic toxicity scores were higher in the valproate group than the topiramate group. We judged the quality of the evidence from the studies to be very low.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Since the last version of this review we found no new studies. This review does not provide sufficient evidence to support topiramate for the treatment of people with JME. Based on the current limited available data, topiramate seems to be better tolerated than valproate, but there were no more benefits of efficacy in topiramate compared with valproate. In the future, well-designed, double-blind RCTs with large samples are required to test the efficacy and tolerability of topiramate in people with JME.

Topiramate monotherapy for juvenile myoclonic epilepsy

BACKGROUND

Topiramate is a newer broad-spectrum of antiepileptic drug (AED). Some studies have shown the benefits of topiramate monotherapy in the treatment of juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME). However, there are no current systematic reviews to determine the efficacy and tolerability of topiramate monotherapy in people with JME.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy and tolerability of topiramate monotherapy in the treatment of JME.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Epilepsy Group Specialized Register (2 November 2015), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL via the Cochrane Register of Studies CRSO, 2 November 2015), MEDLINE (Ovid, 2 November 2015), EMBASE (1 July 2015) and ClinicalTrials.gov (2 November 2015). In an effort to identify further published, unpublished and ongoing trials, we searched ongoing trials registers, reference lists and relevant conference proceedings, and contacted authors and pharmaceutical companies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating topiramate monotherapy versus placebo or other AED treatment for people with JME, with the outcomes of proportion of responders or experiencing adverse events (AEs).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened the titles and abstracts of identified records, selected studies for inclusion, extracted data, cross-checked the data for accuracy and assessed the methodological quality. We performed no meta-analyses due to the limited available data.

MAIN RESULTS

We included three studies with 83 participants. For the efficacy, a greater proportion of participants in the topiramate group had a 50% or more reduction in primarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures (PGTCS) compared with participants in the placebo group. There were no significant differences between topiramate versus valproate in participants responding with a 50% or more reduction in myoclonic seizures or in PGTCS or seizure-free. Concerning tolerability, we ranked AEDs associated with topiramate as moderate-to-severe, while we ranked 59% of AEDs linked to valproate as severe complaints. Moreover, systemic toxicity scores were higher in the valproate group than the topiramate group. We judged the quality of the evidence from the studies to be very low.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review does not provide sufficient evidence to support topiramate for the treatment of people with JME. Based on the current limited available data, topiramate seems to be better tolerated than valproate, but there were no more benefits of efficacy in topiramate compared with valproate. In the future, well-designed, double-blind RCTs with large samples are required to test the efficacy and tolerability of topiramate in people with JME.

Advances on genetic rat models of epilepsy

Considering the suitability of laboratory rats in epilepsy research, we and other groups have been developing genetic models of epilepsy in this species. After epileptic rats or seizure-susceptible rats were sporadically found in outbred stocks, the epileptic traits were usually genetically-fixed by selective breeding. So far, the absence seizure models GAERS and WAG/Rij, audiogenic seizure models GEPR-3 and GEPR-9, generalized tonic-clonic seizure models IER, NER and WER, and Canavan-disease related epileptic models TRM and SER have been established. Dissection of the genetic bases including causative genes in these epileptic rat models would be a significant step toward understanding epileptogenesis. N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU) mutagenesis provides a systematic approach which allowed us to develop two novel epileptic rat models: heat-induced seizure susceptible (Hiss) rats with an Scn1a missense mutation and autosomal dominant lateral temporal epilepsy (ADLTE) model rats with an Lgi1 missense mutation. In addition, we have established episodic ataxia type 1 (EA1) model rats with a Kcna1 missense mutation derived from the ENU-induced rat mutant stock, and identified a Cacna1a missense mutation in a N-Methyl-N-nitrosourea (MNU)-induced mutant rat strain GRY, resulting in the discovery of episodic ataxia type 2 (EA2) model rats. Thus, epileptic rat models have been established on the two paths: ‘phenotype to gene’ and ‘gene to phenotype’. In the near future, development of novel epileptic rat models will be extensively promoted by the use of sophisticated genome editing technologies.

Molecular mechanisms of antiseizure drug activity at GABAA receptors

The GABAA receptor (GABAAR) is a major target of antiseizure drugs (ASDs). A variety of agents that act at GABAARs s are used to terminate or prevent seizures. Many act at distinct receptor sites determined by the subunit composition of the holoreceptor. For the benzodiazepines, barbiturates, and loreclezole, actions at the GABAAR are the primary or only known mechanism of antiseizure action. For topiramate, felbamate, retigabine, losigamone and stiripentol, GABAAR modulation is one of several possible antiseizure mechanisms. Allopregnanolone, a progesterone metabolite that enhances GABAAR function, led to the development of ganaxolone. Other agents modulate GABAergic "tone" by regulating the synthesis, transport or breakdown of GABA. GABAAR efficacy is also affected by the transmembrane chloride gradient, which changes during development and in chronic epilepsy. This may provide an additional target for "GABAergic" ASDs. GABAAR subunit changes occur both acutely during status epilepticus and in chronic epilepsy, which alter both intrinsic GABAAR function and the response to GABAAR-acting ASDs. Manipulation of subunit expression patterns or novel ASDs targeting the altered receptors may provide a novel approach for seizure prevention.

Inhibitory effects of levetiracetam on the high-voltage-activated L-type Ca²⁺ channels in hippocampal CA3 neurons of spontaneously epileptic rat (SER)

Levetiracetam (LEV) is a widely used antiepileptic agent for partial refractory epilepsy in humans. LEV has unique antiepileptic effects in that it does not inhibit electroshock- or pentylenetetrazol-induced convulsion, but does inhibit seizures in kindling animal and spontaneously epileptic rat (SER: zi/zi, tm/tm) that shows both tonic convulsion and absence-like seizures. LEV also has unique characteristics in terms of its antiepileptic mechanism; it has no activity on Na⁺ and K⁺ channels or on glutamate and GABA(A) receptors. Recently, we found that LEV inhibits the depolarization shift and accompanying repetitive firing induced by mossy fiber stimulation in CA3 neurons of SER hippocampal slices. Therefore, this study was performed to determine whether LEV could inhibit the voltage-activated L-type Ca²⁺ current of hippocampal CA3 neurons obtained from SER and the non-epileptic Wistar rat. As previously reported, SER CA3 neurons were classified into type 1 and type 2 neurons. The application of LEV (100 μM) elevated the threshold for activation of the Ca²⁺ current, which was lowered in SER type 1 neurons and reduced the current size. Type 2 neurons of SER have a similar current-voltage relationship to Wistar rat neurons and the decay component of Ca²⁺ current during depolarization pulse in type 2 neurons was found to be smaller than that in Wistar rat neurons. LEV (100 μM) also reduced Ca²⁺ current in SER type 2 neurons. The effects of LEV were examined on such type 2 SER hippocampal CA3 neurons, compared with those on Wistar rat CA3 neurons. Application of LEV (10 μM) produced a significant decrease of amplitude of the Ca²⁺ current in SER neurons, although at this concentration of LEV there was no statistically significant decrease in the amplitude of Ca²⁺ current in Wistar rat neurons. Furthermore, LEV (100 nM-1 mM) reduced the Ca²⁺ current in a concentration-dependent manner in both SER and Wistar rat neurons, but the inhibition was much more potent in the former neurons than in the latter. Under the condition that the Ca²⁺ current had already been inhibited by LEV (10 μM), the addition of nifedipine (10 μM) did not cause further inhibition. Conversely, LEV had no effects on the current that had already been decreased by nifedipine (10 μM) given before LEV treatment (10 μM), indicating that LEV could act on the L-type Ca²⁺ channel. LEV elevated the threshold potential level for activation of the Ca²⁺ current and reduced the L-type Ca²⁺ current in type 1 neurons of SER, and the inhibitory action in type 2 neurons was much more potent than that in Wistar rat neurons, suggesting that these effects contribute, at least partly, to the antiepileptic action of LEV.

Modulation of abnormal synaptic transmission in hippocampal CA3 neurons of spontaneously epileptic rats (SERs) by levetiracetam

Levetiracetam (LEV) inhibits partial refractory epilepsy in human, and both convulsive and absence-like seizures in the spontaneously epileptic rat (SER). Two-thirds of hippocampal CA3 neurons in SER show a long-lasting depolarization shift, with accompanying repetitive firing upon mossy fiber stimulation. This abnormal excitability is probably attributable to abnormalities in the L-type Ca(2+) channels. We performed electrophysiological studies to elucidate the mechanism underlying the antiepileptic effects of LEV via intracellular recording from the hippocampal CA3 neurons in slice preparations of SER and non-epileptic Wistar rats. LEV (100 μM) inhibited the depolarization shift with repetitive firing by mossy fiber stimulation (MFS), without affecting the first spike in SER CA3 neurons. At a higher dose (1mM), LEV suppressed the first spike in all SER neurons (including the CA3 neurons which showed only a single action potential by MFS), while the single action potential of Wistar rat CA3 neurons remained unaffected. SER CA3 neurons with MFS-induced abnormal firing exhibited a higher number of repetitive spikes when a depolarization pulse was applied in the SER CA3 neurons. LEV (100 μM, 1mM) reduced the repetitive firing induced by a depolarization pulse applied without affecting Ca(2+) spike in SER neurons. LEV is known not to bind glutamate and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptors. These findings suggest that the therapeutic concentration of LEV inhibits abnormal firing of the CA3 neurons by modulating abnormal synaptic transmission and abnormal Na(+) channels in SER.

Treatment of juvenile myoclonic epilepsy

Drug treatment of juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME) is mainly based on clinical experience and prospective and retrospective studies, with little evidence from randomized clinical trials. There are almost no head-to-head comparisons between old and new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Valproate is the drug of the first choice in men with JME. In women, lamotrigine (LTG) should be preferred regarding teratogenicity and side effects of valproate. Levetiracetam (LEV) is also effective. Recent data suggest that it may soon be used as first line treatment. Some AEDs can aggravate JME. In addition to AEDs, nonpharmacological treatments are important in JME. JME usually requires lifelong treatment because seizures nearly always return after withdrawal of therapy.

Treatment of juvenile myoclonic epilepsy

Drug treatment of juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME) is mainly based on clinical experience and prospective and retrospective studies, with little evidence from randomized clinical trials. There are almost no head-to-head comparisons between old and new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Valproate is the drug of the first choice in men with JME. In women, lamotrigine (LTG) should be preferred regarding teratogenicity and side effects of valproate. Levetiracetam (LEV) is also effective. Recent data suggest that it may soon be used as first line treatment. Some AEDs can aggravate JME. In addition to AEDs, nonpharmacological treatments are important in JME. JME usually requires lifelong treatment because seizures nearly always return after withdrawal of therapy.

Protective effect of topiramate on kainic acid-induced cell death in mice hippocampus

The protective effect of topiramate (TPM) on seizure-induced neuronal injury is well known; however, its molecular basis has yet to be elucidated. We investigated the effect and signaling mediators of TPM on seizure-induced hippocampal cell death in kainic acid (KA)-treated ICR mice. KA-induced hippocampal cell death was identified by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling. Immunoreactivity (IR) of p-Erk, p-Jnk, p-P38, and caspase-3, and caspase-3 activity were observed in the hippocampal region 3 h after KA (0.1 microg/5 microL, i.c.v.) administration, and/or TPM (100 mg/kg, i.p.) pretreatment. TPM attenuated seizure-induced neuronal cell death and reduced KA-induced p-Erk IR in the CA3 region of the hippocampus, but did not affect p-Jnk and p-P38. In addition, TPM reduced caspase-3 IR and activation by KA. KA-induced seizures were also suppressed by TPM pretreatment. TPM inhibits seizures, and decreases Erk phosphorylation and caspase-3 activation by KA, thereby contributing to protection from neuronal injury.

Treatment of myoclonic seizures in patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy

Drug treatment of Juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME) is mainly based on clinical experience and prospective and retrospective studies, with little evidence from randomized clinical trials. There are no head-to-head comparisons between old and new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and no drugs licensed specifically for JME. Valproate is unquestionably the drug of the first choice in men with JME. In women, lamotrigine should be preferred regarding teratogenicity and side effects of valproate. In addition, levetiracetam and topiramate are effective and can be use in combination or as second line treatment. Some AEDs can aggravate JME. In addition of AEDs, non-pharmacological treatments are important in JME. JME usually require lifelong treatment because seizures nearly always return after withdrawal of therapy.

Novel anticonvulsant drugs

Principles of complex mechanisms of action of anticonvulsants including latest reports concerning new antiepileptic drugs (AED) are considered. Different aspects of new anticonvulsant drugs (2nd generation) from preclinical and clinical testing, pharmacokinetics, and mono or combination therapy in children and adults are summarized. In the following condensed synopsis pharmacological and clinical characteristics of gabapentin (GBP), lamotrigine (LTG), levetiracetam (LEV), oxcarbazepine (OXC), pregabalin (PGB) and tiagabine (TGB) as well as topiramate (TPM) and zonisamide (ZNS) are discussed. In addition to the mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics, interactions, indications and dosages as well as side effects are considered. Important data concerning the effect and tolerability of anticonvulsant drugs can be obtained from controlled studies. In comparison to drugs of the first generation (phenobarbital [PB], primidon [PRD], phenytoin [PHT], carbamazepine [CBZ] and valproic acid [VPA]) the potential for interactions and side effects due to enzyme induction or inhibition is reduced by most of the anticonvulsant drugs of the second generation. New anticonvulsant drugs increase the spectrum of treatment and represent further steps with regard to the optimization of an individual therapy of the epilepsies.

Substantia Nigra Is an Anticonvulsant Site of Action of Topiramate in the Focal Pilocarpine Model of Limbic Seizures

PURPOSE

The substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNR) is known to play a role in gating and control of seizures. Prompted by the observation that intrahippocampal topiramate (TPM) administration does not suppress limbic seizures in the focal pilocarpine model, we investigated the role of the SNR in the anticonvulsant mechanism of action of TPM.

METHODS

Limbic seizures were evoked in freely moving rats by intrahippocampal administration of pilocarpine via a microdialysis probe. Changes in hippocampal extracellular (EC) glutamate and GABA concentrations were monitored. Effects of intraperitoneal (10-200 mg/kg), intrahippocampal (1-5 mM), and bilateral intranigral (100-300 nmol) TPM administration on pilocarpine-induced seizures and neurochemical changes were evaluated. Effects of TPM administration alone on hippocampal and nigral EC amino acid concentrations were also studied.

RESULTS

Systemic and intranigral, but not intrahippocampal TPM administration suppressed pilocarpine-induced seizures and neurochemical changes. Nigral GABA(A) receptor blockade by picrotoxin abolished the anticonvulsant effect of TPM in SNR. Systemic TPM administration increased hippocampal glutamate and decreased GABA. Intranigral TPM administration increased hippocampal glutamate, but not GABA. Intrahippocampal TPM increased hippocampal glutamate and GABA, but only at high concentrations.

CONCLUSIONS

In the focal pilocarpine model, TPM does not exert its anticonvulsant effect at the site of seizure initiation. We identified the SNR as a site of action of TPM, and showed that the nigral GABA-ergic system is central to TPM's anticonvulsant effect in SNR. Anticonvulsant effects and neurochemical changes in hippocampus following intranigral TPM administration suggest the existence of a nigro-hippocampal circuit, which may be involved in the control of limbic seizures.

Suppression of cortical spreading depression in migraine prophylaxis

OBJECTIVE

Topiramate, valproate, propranolol, amitriptyline, and methysergide have been widely prescribed for migraine prophylaxis, but their mechanism or site of action is uncertain. Cortical spreading depression (CSD) has been implicated in migraine and as a headache trigger and can be evoked in experimental animals by electrical or chemical stimulation. We hypothesized that migraine prophylactic agents suppress CSD as a common mechanism of action.

METHODS

Rats were treated either acutely or chronically over weeks and months, with one of the above migraine prophylactic drugs, vehicle, or D-propranolol, a clinically ineffective drug. The impact of treatment was determined on the frequency of evoked CSDs after topical potassium application or on the incremental cathodal stimulation threshold to evoke CSD.

RESULTS

Chronic daily administration of migraine prophylactic drugs dose-dependently suppressed CSD frequency by 40 to 80% and increased the cathodal stimulation threshold, whereas acute treatment was ineffective. Longer treatment durations produced stronger CSD suppression. Chronic D-propranolol treatment did not differ from saline control.

INTERPRETATION

Our data suggest that CSD provides a common therapeutic target for widely prescribed migraine prophylactic drugs. Assessing CSD threshold may prove useful for developing new prophylactic drugs and improving upon existing ones.

Topiramate Inhibits the Initiation of Plateau Potentials in CA1 Neurons by Depressing R-type Calcium Channels

PURPOSE

Cholinergic-dependent plateau potentials (PPs) are intrinsically generated conductances that can elicit ictal-type seizure activity. The aim of this study was to investigate the actions of topiramate (TPM) on the generation of PPs.

METHODS

We used whole-cell patch-clamp recordings from CA1 pyramidal neurons in rat hippocampal slices to examine the effects of TPM on the PPs.

RESULTS

In current-clamp mode, action potentials evoked PPs after cholinergic receptor stimulation. Therapeutically relevant concentrations of TPM (50 microM) depressed the PPs evoked by action potentials. Surprisingly, in voltage-clamp mode, we discovered that the cyclic nucleotide-gated (CNG) current that underlies PP generation (denoted as I(tail)) was not depressed. However, significantly longer depolarizing voltage steps were required to elicit I(tail). This suggested that the calcium entry trigger for evoking PPs was depressed by TPM and not I(tail) itself. TPM had no effect on calcium spikes in control conditions; however, TPM did reduce calcium spikes after cholinergic-receptor stimulation. We recently found that R-type calcium spikes are enhanced by cholinergic-receptor stimulation. Therefore we isolated R-type calcium spikes with a cocktail containing tetrodotoxin, omega-conotoxin MVIIC, omega-conotoxin-GVIA, omega-agatoxin IVA, and nifedipine. R-type calcium spikes were significantly depressed by TPM. We also examined the effects of TPM on recombinant Ca(V)2.3 calcium channels expressed in tsA-201 cells. TPM depressed currents mediated by Ca(V)2.3 subunits by a hyperpolarizing shift in steady-state inactivation.

CONCLUSIONS

We have found that TPM reduces ictal-like activity in CA1 hippocampal neurons through a novel inhibitory action of R-type calcium channels.

Topiramate modulates pH of hippocampal CA3 neurons by combined effects on carbonic anhydrase and Cl-/HCO3- exchange

Topiramate (TPM) is an anticonvulsant whose impact on firing activity and intracellular pH (pHi) regulation of CA3 neurons was investigated. Using the 4-aminopyridine-treated hippocampal slice model bathed in bicarbonate-buffered solution, TPM (25-50 microm) reduced the frequency of epileptiform bursts and action potentials without affecting membrane potential or input resistance. Inhibitory effects of TPM were reversed by trimethylamine-induced alkalinization. TPM also lowered the steady-state pHi of BCECF-AM-loaded neuronal somata by 0.18+/-0.07 pH units in CO(2)/HCO(3)(-)-buffered solution. Subsequent to an ammonium prepulse, TPM reduced the acidotic peak but clearly slowed pHi recovery. These complex changes were mimicked by the protein phosphatase inhibitor okadaic acid. Alkalosis upon withdrawal of extracellular Cl(-) was augmented by TPM. Furthermore, at decreased pHi due to the absence of extracellular Na(+), TPM reversibly increased pHi. These findings demonstrate that TPM modulates Na(+)-independent Cl(-)/HCO(3)(-) exchange. In the nominal absence of extracellular CO(2)/HCO(3)(-) buffer, both steady-state pHi and firing of epileptiform bursts remained unchanged upon adding TPM. However, pHi recovery subsequent to an ammonium prepulse was slightly increased, as was the case in the presence of the carbonic anhydrase (CA) inhibitor acetazolamide. Thus, a slight reduction of intracellular buffer capacity by TPM may be due to an inhibitory effect on intracellular CA. Together, these findings show that TPM lowers neuronal pHi most likely due to a combined effect on Na(+)-independent Cl(-)/HCO(3)(-) exchange and CA. The apparent decrease of steady-state pHi may contribute to the anticonvulsive property of TPM.

Topiramate hyperpolarizes and modulates the slow poststimulus AHP of rat olfactory cortical neurones in vitro

1. The effects of the novel antiepileptic drug topiramate (TPM) were investigated in rat olfactory cortex neurones in vitro using a current/voltage clamp technique. 2. In 80% of recorded cells, bath application of TPM (20 microm) reversibly hyperpolarized and inhibited neuronal repetitive firing by inducing a slow outward membrane current, accompanied by a conductance increase. The response was reproducible after washout, and was most likely carried largely by K(+) ions, although other ionic conductances may also have contributed. 3. In 90% of cells, TPM (20 microm) also enhanced and prolonged the slow (Ca(2+)-dependent) poststimulus afterhyperpolarization (sAHP) and underlying slow outward tail current (sI(AHP)). This effect was due to a selective enhancement/prolongation of an underlying L-type Ca(2+) current that was blocked by nifedipine (20 microm); the TPM response was unlikely to involve an interaction at PKA-dependent phosphorylation sites. 4. The carbonic anhydrase (CA) inhibitor acetazolamide (ACTZ, 20 microm) and the poorly membrane permeant inhibitor benzolamide (BZ, 50 microm) both mimicked the membrane effects of TPM, in generating a slow hyperpolarization (slow outward current under voltage clamp) and sAHP enhancement. ACTZ and BZ occluded the effects of TPM in generating the outward current response, but were additive in producing the sAHP modulatory effect, suggesting different underlying response mechanisms. 5. In bicarbonate/CO(2)-free, HEPES-buffered medium, all the membrane effects of TPM and ACTZ were reproducible, therefore not dependent on CA inhibition. 6. We propose that both novel effects of TPM and ACTZ exerted on cortical neurones may contribute towards their clinical effectiveness as anticonvulsants.

Involvement of Ca(2+) channels in abnormal excitability of hippocampal CA3 pyramidal cells in noda epileptic rats

Noda epileptic rat (NER) is a mutant rat, which spontaneously exhibits a tonic-clonic convulsion from 14 weeks of age. An intracellular recording study was performed to elucidate the abnormal excitability of NER hippocampal CA3 neurons. The recorded neurons were classified into two groups, group A and B neurons, according to the responses to a single stimulation of mossy fibers. In group A neurons, a stimulus elicited a long-lasting depolarization shift accompanying repetitive firings followed by after-hyperpolarization. In group B neurons, the same stimulus elicited a single spike without a long-lasting depolarization shift. Bath application of 1 mM Cd(2+), a nonselective Ca(2+) channel blocker, completely inhibited the abnormal excitation in group A neurons. We further examined the character of Ca(2+) spikes in NER CA3 neurons. Ca(2+) spikes were completely blocked by 10 microM Cd(2+) in group A neurons, but not in either group B or control neurons, suggesting that Ca(2+) channels in NER group A neurons have the hypersensitivity to Cd(2+). Analysis using subtype specific blockers of Ca(2+) channel raised the possible involvement of T-type Ca(2+) channels. These results suggest that Ca(2+) channel dysfunction is involved in the abnormal excitability of CA3 pyramidal neurons and pathogenesis of epilepsy in NER.

Epileptiform burst discharges in hippocampal CA3 neurons of young but not mature Noda epileptic rats (NER)

Noda epileptic rat (NER), originally found in a colony of Crj; Wistar rats, shows spontaneous tonic-clonic convulsion characterized by the appearance of high voltage polyspikes in cortical and hippocampal EEG once every 2-3 days after 2-4 months of age. Electrophysiological studies using hippocampal slice preparations of NER were performed to determine whether hippocampal neurons have abnormal excitability. When a single stimulus (1-25 V) was delivered to the mossy fibers of NER at 4-6 weeks old before they showed any seizures, a long-lasting depolarization shift (DS) accompanied by repetitive firings and after-hyperpolarization following the abnormal firing was observed in seven of 14 hippocampal CA3 neurons. A lower stimulation intensity evoked DS and abnormal firing in three of nine CA3 neurons of NER at 10-15 weeks old which had already showed seizures at 10-15 weeks of age. However, the abnormal firing was not observed in any 10 neurons of the animals at more than 20 weeks old nor in Wistar rats. The input impedances of CA3 neurons in NER with abnormal firing were lower than those without abnormal firing and those in Wistar rats. The abnormal excitability obtained in NER at an age when it did not display any seizures suggests that the hippocampus may play a role in epileptogenicity in NER.

Effects of vigabatrin on epileptiform abnormal discharges in hippocampal CA3 neurons of spontaneously epileptic rats (SER)

Vigabatrin, a gamma-amino butyric acid (GABA) transaminase inhibitor, is known to inhibit partial epilepsy in humans. The spontaneously epileptic rat (SER), a double mutant (zi/zi, tm/tm), exhibits both tonic convulsion and absence-like seizures from the age of 8 weeks. Hippocampal CA3 pyramidal neurons in SER show a long-lasting depolarization shift with accompanying repetitive firing when a single stimulus is delivered to the mossy fibers in slice preparations. The effects of vigabatrin on the abnormal excitability of hippocampal CA3 pyramidal neurons in SER were examined to elucidate the mechanism underlying the antiepileptic action of the drug. Intracellular recordings were performed in 24 hippocampal slice preparations of 20 SER aged 8-17 weeks old. Bath application of vigabatrin (1 mM) inhibited the depolarizing shifts with repetitive firing induced by mossy fiber stimulation in 15 min without affecting the first spike and resting membrane potentials in hippocampal CA3 neurons of SER. A higher dose of vigabatrin (10 mM) sometimes inhibited the first spike. However, vigabatrin at doses up to 10 mM did not significantly affect the single action potential elicited by stimulation of the mossy fibers in the hippocampal CA3 neurons of age-matched Wistar rats. In addition, application of vigabatrin (10 mM) did not significantly affect the firing induced by depolarizing pulse applied in the CA3 neurons of the SER, nor the miniature excitatory postsynaptic potential (mEPSP) recorded in the CA3 neurons of SER. The inhibitory effect of vigabatrin (1 mM) on the mossy fiber stimulation-induced depolarization shift with repetitive firing was blocked by concomitant application of bicuculline (10 microM), a GABA(A) receptor antagonist. These findings strongly suggested that GABA increased by inhibition of GABA transaminase with vigabatrin inhibits abnormal excitation of hippocampal CA3 neurons of SER via GABA(A) receptors, although the possibility that the drug acted directly on the GABA(A) receptors of CA3 neurons could not be completely excluded.

Neuroprotection and neurodegenerative disease

This paper will focus on commonalities in the aetiology and pathology in five areas of neurological disease with illustrative examples of therapy. Possibilities of multimodal and neuroprotective therapies in human disease, employing currently available drugs and showing evidence of neuroprotective potential in animal models, are discussed. By definition, neuroprotection is an effect that may result in salvage, recovery or regeneration of the nervous system, its cells, structure and function. It is thought that there are many neurochemical modulators of nervous system damage. In epilepsy, excessive glutamate-mediated neurotransmission, impaired voltage sensitive sodium and calcium channel functioning, impaired GABA-mediated inhibition and alterations in acid base balance, when set in motion, may trigger a cascade of events leading to neuronal damage and cell death. Acute and chronic nervous system damage in response to an insult may lead to acute or delayed neuronal death, apoptotic cell death, neuronal degeneration, injury and loss, and gliosis. Cell death in the CNS following injury can occur in the manner of apoptosis, necrosis or hybrid forms. In general, NMDA receptor and non-NMDA receptor mediated excitotoxic injury results in neurodegeneration along an apoptosis-necrosis continuum. The effects of neuronal injury depend on factors including the degree of brain maturity or site of the lesion. There is some evidence supporting the hypothesis that neuroprotection may be a practical and achievable target using drugs already available, at present employed only for limited indications. Using these drugs early in the disease, may save decades of development of new drugs, which would require evaluation in animal studies, and human clinical trials. New drugs would also need to be shown to be safe and acceptable, physiologically not detrimental to humans and free from idiosyncratic adverse effects.

Anticonvulsant action of topiramate against motor seizures in developing rats

PURPOSE

To study the anticonvulsant action of topiramate (TPM) in developing rats.

METHODS

Motor seizures were elicited by administering pentylenetetrazol (100 mg/kg subcutaneously) in five age groups of Wistar rats (7, 12, 18, 25, and 90 days old). TPM was administered intraperitoneally in doses from 10 to 640 mg/kg 2 hours before pentylenetetrazol. The time course of TPM action was studied in 12- and 25-day-old rats up to 24 hours after the 160-mg/kg dose, and the incidence and pattern of seizures were evaluated.

RESULTS

TPM did not influence minimal seizures (clonus of forelimb and head muscles with preserved righting ability). Generalized tonic-clonic seizures, however, were reliably changed at all developmental stages studied. The tonic phase was suppressed so that the majority of animals exhibited generalized clonic seizures (with a loss of righting reflexes). In addition, the incidence of generalized seizures was decreased after the 20-, 40-, and 80-mg/kg doses in the 7-day-old rat pups. The specific suppression of the tonic phase of generalized seizures was observed up to 12 hours in the 12-day-old rat pups. The same result was obtained over 6 hours after TPM administration in the 25-day-old animals, and with longer intervals the incidence of generalized seizures decreased in this age group.

CONCLUSIONS

TPM exhibits stable anticonvulsant action against the tonic phase of generalized tonic-clonic seizures throughout development. In addition, it suppresses all phases of generalized seizures in 7-day-old rats. The anticonvulsant action of TPM lasted longer in 25-day-old than in 12-day-old rats. The two actions of TPM might be ascribed to two different mechanisms of action.

Antiepileptic efficacy of topiramate: assessment in two in vitro seizure models

The antiepileptic efficacy of topiramate (TPM) has been demonstrated in both whole animal seizure models and clinical trials; however, there is no consensus concerning its mechanism of action. We determined first whether the antiepileptic effect of TPM generalized to in vitro seizure models. Epileptiform discharges, recorded extracellularly, were evoked by repeated tetanic stimulation of Schaffer collaterals and layer III association fibers in entorhinal cortex/hippocampus and piriform cortex slices, respectively. TPM was applied at concentrations of 20 or 100 microM. Whole cell recordings were made from CA1 pyramidal neurons and the effect of TPM was assessed on a variety of intrinsic membrane properties including resting membrane potential, input resistance and postspike potentials. TPM (20 microM) was without effect in entorhinal cortex/hippocampus (N=6); however, 100 microM TPM decreased significantly the Coastline Burst Index from 358.3+/-65.8 to 225. 5+/-77.1 (N=4), the frequency of spontaneous epileptiform discharges to 44.6+/-21.8 (N=5) and the duration of primary afterdischarge (PAD) to 65.9+/-10.1 (N=10) percent of control. In contrast, phenytoin (50 microM, N=7; 100 microM, N=8) reduced PAD to 96.9+/-14. 8 and 86.5+/-17.3 percent of control, respectively. TPM (100 microM) did not reduce significantly the frequency of spontaneous discharges in piriform cortex (85.4+/-12.3 percent of control; N=5). TPM (100 microM) was without significant effect on intrinsic membrane properties in CA1 pyramidal neurons. Likely candidate mechanisms underlying the antiepileptic effect produced by TPM include enhancement of chloride-mediated GABA(A) currents and reduction of kainate and L-type calcium currents.

Epileptic seizures induced by N-acetyl-L-aspartate in rats: in vivo and in vitro studies

Tremor rat (tm/tm), the parent strain of spontaneously epileptic rat (SER: zi/zi, tm/tm), exhibits absence-like seizures characterized by 5-7 Hz spike-wave-like complexes on cortical and hippocampal electroencephalograms (EEG) after 10 weeks of age, prior to development of convulsive seizures. Recently, this animal model has been demonstrated to display a genomic microdeletion within the critical region of tm, where aspartoacylase hydrolyzing N-acetyl-L aspartate (NAA) is located, besides showing the ability to accumulate NAA in the brain. Therefore, the present study was performed to determine the involvement of NAA in the induction of epileptic seizures. When NAA (4 micromol) was applied intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v.) to normal Wistar rats, 4-10 Hz polyspikes and/or spike-wave-like complexes followed by absence-like seizure before persistent 1-5 Hz waxing high-voltage after-discharges were observed on cortical and hippocampal EEG. At a higher dose (8 micromol), NAA induced convulsive seizures. The absence-like seizures with polyspikes and/or spike-wave-like complexes on the EEG were also observed with i.c.v. NAA in premature tremor rats without seizures. The NAA-induced seizures in normal rats were antagonized by i.c.v. glutamic acid diethyl ester, a non-selective glutamate receptor antagonist. In addition, NAA applied to the bath rapidly induced a long-lasting depolarization concomitantly with repetitive firings in hippocampal CA3 neurons of normal rat brain slice preparations. These findings suggest that NAA is involved in the induction of absence-like seizures and/or convulsion, probably via glutamate receptors.

Topiramate potentiates the antiseizure activity of some anticonvulsants in DBA/2 mice

Topiramate (1-50 mg/kg, intraperitoneally (i.p.)) was able to antagonize audiogenic seizures in DBA/2 mice in a dose-dependent manner. Topiramate at dose of 2.5 mg/kg i.p., which per se did not significantly affect the occurrence of audiogenic seizures in DBA/2 mice, potentiated the anticonvulsant activity of carbamazepine, diazepam, felbamate, lamotrigine, phenytoin, phenobarbital and valproate against sound-induced seizures in DBA/2 mice. The degree of potentiation induced by topiramate was greatest for diazepam, phenobarbital and valproate, less for lamotrigine and phenytoin and not significant for carbamazepine and felbamate. The increase in anticonvulsant activity was associated with a comparable increase in motor impairment. However, the therapeutic index of the combination of all drugs+topiramate was more favourable than that of antiepileptics+ saline, with the exception of carbamazepine or felbamate+topiramate. Since topiramate did not significantly influence the total and free plasma levels of the anticonvulsant drugs studied, we suggest that pharmacokinetic interactions, in terms of total or free plasma levels, are not probable. However, the possibility that topiramate can modify the clearance from the brain of the anticonvulsant drugs studied cannot be excluded. In addition, topiramate did not significantly affect the hypothermic effects of the anticonvulsants tested. In conclusion, topiramate showed an additive effect when administered in combination with some classical anticonvulsants, most notably diazepam, phenobarbital, lamotrigine, phenytoin and valproate.