Evidence for supraspinal nervous control of external anal sphincter motility in the cat

Gastrointestinal dysfunction after spinal cord injury

The gastrointestinal tract of vertebrates is a heterogeneous organ system innervated to varying degrees by a local enteric neural network as well as extrinsic parasympathetic and sympathetic neural circuits located along the brainstem and spinal axis. This diverse organ system serves to regulate the secretory and propulsive reflexes integral to the digestion and absorption of nutrients. The quasi-segmental distribution of the neural circuits innervating the gastrointestinal (GI) tract produces varying degrees of dysfunction depending upon the level of spinal cord injury (SCI). At all levels of SCI, GI dysfunction frequently presents life-long challenges to individuals coping with injury. Growing attention to the profound changes that occur across the entire physiology of individuals with SCI reveals profound knowledge gaps in our understanding of the temporal dimensions and magnitude of organ-specific co-morbidities following SCI. It is essential to understand and identify these broad pathophysiological changes in order to develop appropriate evidence-based strategies for management by clinicians, caregivers and individuals living with SCI. This review summarizes the neurophysiology of the GI tract in the uninjured state and the pathophysiology associated with the systemic effects of SCI.

How sacral nerve stimulation works in patients with faecal incontinence

AIM

Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) reduces incontinence episodes and improves the quality of life of patients treated for faecal incontinence. However, the exact mechanism of action of this technique remains unclear. The present article reviews the pertinent neuroanatomy and neurophysiology related to SNS and provides explanations for potential mechanisms of action.

METHOD

A systematic review of the literature was performed for studies of the potential mechanisms of action of SNS, using MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library. Articles dealing with the technique, adverse events and economic evaluations of SNS, as well as literature reviews, were excluded, except for reviews dealing with the mechanisms of action of SNS. The following inclusion criteria were used to select articles: (i) articles in English, (ii) randomized, double-blinded, sham-controlled studies, and (iii) cohort studies. Case-control studies or retrospective studies were cited only when randomized or cohort studies could not be found.

RESULTS

We propose three hypotheses to explain the mechanism of action of SNS: (i) a somato-visceral reflex, (ii) a modulation of the perception of afferent information, and (iii) an increase in external anal sphincter activity.

CONCLUSION

The mechanism of action of SNS in patients with faecal incontinence almost certainly depends on the modulation of spinal and/or supraspinal afferent inputs. Further research on humans and animals will be required to gain a better understanding of the mechanisms of action of SNS.

Supraspinal control of external anal sphincter motility: effects of vesical distension in humans and cats

A pontine centre located near the micturition centre controlling external anal sphincter (EAS) motility via noradrenergic neurones has been described in cats. The aim of this study was to determine (i) whether a similar centre controls EAS motility in humans and (ii) whether this centre is involved in vesico-sphincteric reflexes in cats and humans. The effects of an alpha-1-adrenoceptor antagonist (nicergoline) and those of vesical distension on the electrical activity of the EAS were studied in paraplegic and non-paraplegic volunteers. The effects of vesical distension by injecting saline at physiological levels on the responses of the EAS to pudendal nerve stimulation were investigated in intact cats and cats with nerve sections. In non-paraplegic subjects, nicergoline and vesical distension abolished the activity of the EAS. These effects were no longer observed in paraplegic patients. In cats, vesical distension inhibited the reflex response of the EAS to pudendal nerve stimulation. This vesico-sphincteric reflex, which was no longer observed in spinal animals, persisted after nicergoline injection. These findings indicate that in humans, there exists a supra-spinal centre facilitating the tonic activity of the EAS via noradrenergic neurones not involved in the inhibitory vesico-sphincteric reflex.

Effects and mechanisms of anal electrical stimulation on anorectal compliance and tone in dogs

PURPOSE

This study was designed to investigate the changes in rectal compliance and tone during anal electric stimulation and the involvement of the alpha-adrenergic pathway in conscious dogs.

METHODS

Eight healthy dogs were studied in five randomized sessions. Anal sphincter pressure was quantified by using the area under the contractile curve. Rectal compliance and tone were measured in a pressure-controlled phasic and isobaric distention by using an electronic barostat. Anal electric stimulation was performed via a pair of ring electrodes attached to the catheter.

RESULTS

The electric stimulation-induced increase in sphincter pressure was lowered by the presence of an alpha(1)-adrenergic receptor antagonist, prazosin (18.6 +/- 7.4 vs. 45.4 +/- 9.7, P < 0.05), or alpha(2)-adrenergic receptor antagonist, yohimbine (10.2 +/- 8.2 vs. 38.3 +/- 7.6, P < 0.05), compared with the control. The threshold volume in rectoanal inhibitory reflex during electric stimulation was significantly higher than during baseline (27.5 +/- 0.9 vs. 22.5 +/- 1.9 ml, P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the percentage drops in sphincter pressure with and without stimulation at a rectal distention level of 45 ml of air. Anal electric stimulation significantly increased rectal compliance reflected as reduced P(1/2) (11.1 +/- 1.5 vs. 16.7 +/- 1.1, P = 0.027) and reduced kappa (11.6 +/- 2.5 vs. 20.5 +/- 2.6, P = 0.0095), compared with the control session, but did not significantly alter rectal tone.

CONCLUSIONS

Anal electric stimulation increases anal sphincter pressure, mediated at least partially by the alpha-adrenergic pathway. It also increases rectal compliance but does not alter rectal anal inhibitory reflexes.

Anal electrical stimulation with long pulses increases anal sphincter pressure in conscious dogs

PURPOSE

This study was designed to investigate the effects and mechanisms of anal electric stimulation with long pulses on anal sphincter pressure in conscious dogs.

METHODS

The study was performed after enema in nine healthy female hound dogs and composed of four randomized sessions ("dose"-response, anal electric stimulation only, or with atropine or phentolamine). The anal sphincter pressure was measured by using manometry and quantified by using the area under the contractile curve (mmHg/sec). Anal electric stimulation was performed via a pair of ring electrodes attached to a manometric catheter. The stimulation parameters in all but dose-response sessions included a frequency of 20 ppm, pulse width of 200 ms, and amplitude of 3 mA.

RESULTS

The anal sphincter pressure was 55.7 +/- 6 at baseline and increased by 37 percent to 76.4 +/- 6.5 during electric stimulation (P = 0.009). The increase of anal pressure during stimulation was positively correlated with the stimulation energy (r = 0.395; P < 0.01). The excitatory effect of electric stimulation was sustained for at least 20 minutes. Atropine did not alter anal pressure and did not abolish the excitatory effect of anal electric stimulation on the sphincter. Phentolamine reduced anal pressure from the baseline value of 50.5 +/- 4.7 to 33.1 +/- 5.4 (P = 0.019). The electric stimulation induced increase in anal pressure was dropped from 19 +/- 2.6 to 9.9 +/- 2.8 (P = 0.029) at the presence of phentolamine.

CONCLUSIONS

Anal electric stimulation with long pulses increases anal sphincter pressure in an energy-dependent manner. The alpha-adrenergic but not the cholinergic pathway at least partially mediates the excitatory effect of anal electric stimulation.

Endogenous opiates: 1998

This paper is the twenty-first installment of our annual review of research concerning the opiate system. It summarizes papers published during 1998 that studied the behavioral effects of the opiate peptides and antagonists, excluding the purely analgesic effects, although stress-induced analgesia is included. The specific topics covered this year include stress; tolerance and dependence; eating and drinking; alcohol; gastrointestinal, renal, and hepatic function; mental illness and mood; learning, memory, and reward; cardiovascular responses; respiration and thermoregulation; seizures and other neurologic disorders; electrical-related activity; general activity and locomotion; sex, pregnancy, and development; immunologic responses; and other behaviors.