Development of an ELISA for the detection of serum chromogranin A (CgA) in prostate and non-neuroendocrine carcinomas

Accuracy and Clinical Correlates of Two Different Methods for Chromogranin A Assay in Neuroendocrine Tumors

Measurement of chromogranin A (CgA) plays a major role in the management of neuroendocrine tumors (NET); however, reliable assaying of CgA is made difficult by the rapid hydrolysis following its release into the bloodstream. This study was aimed at the assessment of two assays for CgA in NET patients. CgA was measured in 93 patients by means of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and an immunoradiometric assay (IRMA). The specificity and sensitivity of CgA were evaluated in relation to tumor histology. The clinical accuracy of the two assays was evaluated by receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Regression analysis demonstrated different immunoreactivity for CgA of the antibodies used in the two kits (r=0.61). The two assays had different accuracy also in classifying patients according to their clinical condition (91% vs 64% specificity and 79% vs 79% sensitivity for the ELISA and IRMA assay, respectively) and tumor histology (81% vs 85% sensitivity for the ELISA and IRMA assays, respectively, in carcinoids; 92% vs 67% sensitivity for the ELISA and IRMA assays, respectively, in pancreatic islet cell tumors). The different clinical accuracy of the two assays was confirmed by the ROC analysis (AUC=0.90 vs AUC=0.87 for the ELISA and IRMA assays, respectively). In conclusion, because of the poor standardization of the commercially available measurement tools the clinical accuracy of CgA measurement depends on the assay used. This makes it difficult to compare CgA values measured with different kits and affects the clinical accuracy of the different assays for CgA.

Role of tumor microenvironment in tumorigenesis

Tumorigenesis is a complex and dynamic process, consisting of three stages: initiation, progression, and metastasis. Tumors are encircled by extracellular matrix (ECM) and stromal cells, and the physiological state of the tumor microenvironment (TME) is closely connected to every step of tumorigenesis. Evidence suggests that the vital components of the TME are fibroblasts and myofibroblasts, neuroendocrine cells, adipose cells, immune and inflammatory cells, the blood and lymphatic vascular networks, and ECM. This manuscript, based on the current studies of the TME, offers a more comprehensive overview of the primary functions of each component of the TME in cancer initiation, progression, and invasion. The manuscript also includes primary therapeutic targeting markers for each player, which may be helpful in treating tumors.

The biochemical utility of chromogranin A, chromogranin B and cocaine- and amphetamine-regulated transcript for neuroendocrine neoplasia

Neuroendocrine neoplasia (NEN) is a heterogeneous group of tumours and often represents a therapeutic challenge to clinicians. The peptides chromogranin A (CgA), chromogranin B (CgB) and cocaine- and amphetamine-regulated transcript (CART) are widely distributed throughout the neuroendocrine system. CgA and CgB have been used as general NEN biomarkers for many years, while CART has only recently been identified. Of these biomarkers, CgA is the most commonly used. However, circulating CgA concentrations exhibit considerable intra-individual biological variation, are altered by proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and somatostatin analogues and are elevated in non-NEN malignancies. Therefore, interpretation of CgA results must be in the context of these confounding factors. The effects of treatment and non-NEN conditions on circulating CgB and CART concentrations are less well understood. CgB is less affected by impaired renal function and PPIs than CgA; while, circulating CART concentrations lack a diurnal variation in humans and are more reliable markers of pancreatic NEN malignancy than CgA. The utility of circulating CgA measurements in NEN prognosis, surveillance and disease recurrence has been widely investigated. However, the utility of CgB and CART in NEN management is yet to be elucidated. Further studies are needed to establish whether CgB and CART are useful alternatives to CgA.

Molecular markers of prostate cancer

Although prostate-specific antigen (PSA) has evolved as a very useful tool for detection of prostate cancer, there remains an urgent need for more accurate biomarkers to diagnose prostate cancer and predict cancer-related outcomes. Recent advances in the study of proteomics and high throughput techniques have led to the discovery of many potential biomarkers for prostate cancer. This article briefly reviews the current status of PSA testing and discusses several candidate protein biomarkers for prostate cancer, as well as highlighting some recent proteomic discoveries with the potential to supplement or even replace PSA for the diagnosis and prognosis of prostate cancer.

The prognostic significance of circulating neuroendocrine markers chromogranin a, pro-gastrin-releasing peptide and neuron-specific enolase in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Chromogranin A (CGA), Pro-gastrin-releasing peptide (ProGRP) and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) are known as immunohistochemical tissue markers closely associated with neuroendocrine differentiation in non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). The aim of the present study was to assess the value of serum levels of these markers in predicting response to chemotherapy and survival of patients with unresectable NSCLC.

METHODS

The study included 67 patients with advanced NSCLC treated with chemotherapy. Before treatment, serum levels of CGA, ProGRP and NSE were measured with commercial kits.

RESULTS

No association was found between serum NSE and age, gender, histology, performance status or extent of the disease. Distribution of serum CGA differed significantly according to gender and histology, with higher levels being found in men (p = 0.01) and in squamous cell carcinoma (p = 0.01). Serum ProGRP levels correlated with disease extent, being higher in patients with metastatic disease (M1) than in those with locoregional disease (M0; p = 0.02). The association of NSE, CGA and ProGRP levels with response to chemotherapy was not significant. While NSE had no impact on survival, the median survival was shorter for patients with elevated serum CGA and longer for patients with high ProGRP levels. Association with survival was significant when the Classification and Regression Tree (CART)-derived or median cutoff points were explored. On inclusion in multivariate Cox models, both CGA and ProGRP retained significance with high levels showing an opposite effect on survival [CART-derived cutoff points: CGA, relative risk (RR) -4.0; p < 0.001, and ProGRP, RR -0.4; p = 0.006, and median cutoff points: CGA, RR -1.8; p = 0.04, and ProGRP, RR -0.5; p = 0.03]. The combined use of CGA, ProGRP and NSE allowed for definition of two sets of patients with significantly different median survival times (25.2 vs. 8.8 months, p = 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In the circulation, CGA and Pro-GRP appear to bear important information related to the prognosis for NSCLC patients before chemotherapy. While a high CGA before treatment was found as an unfavorable prognostic determinant, a high ProGRP conferred a survival advantage. The combined use of serum CGA, ProGRP and NSE may supply additional information to prognosis.

Detection of Prostate Cancer and Predicting Progression

Carcinoma of the prostate is the second leading cause of male cancer-related death in the United States. Better indicators of prostate cancer presence and progression are needed to avoid unnecessary treatment, predict disease course, and develop more effective therapy. Numerous molecular markers have been described in human serum, urine, seminal fluid, and histological specimens that exhibit varying capacities to detect prostate cancer and predict disease course. However, to date, few of these markers have been adequately validated for clinical use. The purpose of this review is to examine the current status of these markers in prostate cancer and to assess the diagnostic potential for future markers from identified genes and molecules that display loss, mutation, or alteration in expression between tumor and normal prostate tissues. In this review we cite 91 molecular markers that display some level of correlation with prostate cancer presence, disease progression, cancer recurrence, prediction of response to therapy, and/or disease-free survival. We suggest criteria to consider when selecting a marker for further development as a clinical tool and discuss five examples of markers (chromogranin A, glutathione S-transferase pi 1, prostate stem cell antigen, prostate-specific membrane antigen, and telomerase reverse transcriptase) that fulfill some of these criteria. Finally, we discuss how to conduct evaluations of candidate prostate cancer markers and some of the issues involved in the validation process.

Selenium and prevention of prostate cancer in high-risk men: the Negative Biopsy Study

Epidemiological and clinical studies suggesting a significant inverse relationship between intake of dietary selenium and overall cancer risk have led to initiation of a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase III clinical trial testing the safety and efficacy of selenized yeast as a chemopreventive agent for prostate cancer. Participants eligible for the 'Negative Biopsy Study', which was initiated in August 1999, are men considered to be at high risk for prostate cancer because of at least one negative sextant prostate biopsy, which was clinically indicated within 1 year of enrollment to the study. After a 30-day run-in period to ensure protocol compliance, participants are randomized to receive either 200 or 400 microg selenized yeast or matched placebo once daily. Primary study endpoints include development of prostate cancer and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) velocity. Secondary biochemical endpoints include change in chromagranin A and alkaline phosphatase. As of 1 June 2003, 514 eligible participants had been enrolled. Randomization schema was effective for selected parameters including age, body mass index, smoking status, baseline PSA and baseline plasma selenium level. Various data, including medical history, family history, and urological symptoms and specimens (including blood and subsequent prostate biopsy samples) had been collected at baseline, and throughout both the intervention and follow-up stages of the protocol. The goal for accrual is 700 evaluable participants.

Selenium and inhibition of disease progression in men diagnosed with prostate carcinoma: study design and baseline characteristics of the ‘Watchful Waiting’ Study

Impediment of the promotion and progression stages of carcinogenesis of the prostate could have a profound impact on treatment choice and prognosis for prostate cancer. Efficacious chemopreventive agents that elicit their activity by slowing the processes of progression could make watchful waiting a viable alternative for a large population of men or could delay the necessity for surgery, radiation or other more invasive treatment modalities associated with frequent side effects. Reports from the Nutritional Prevention of Cancer (NPC) study reported that dietary supplementation with selenium significantly reduced the risk of developing prostate cancer. These data led to initiation of the Watchful Waiting Study, a phase II, multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical intervention study testing the effects of two doses of selenized yeast on progression of prostate cancer. Participants are men with biopsy-proven prostate cancer who have elected to forgo therapy and be closely followed by 'watchful waiting' that includes quarterly prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening. Subjects are randomized to receive 200 or 800 microg of selenized yeast or matched placebo daily. Endpoints include time to disease progression and PSA velocity. Secondary endpoints include time to initiation of therapy as well as biochemical markers of disease progression including chromagranin A and alkaline phosphatase. Immunohistochemical analyses for indicators of apoptosis, proliferation and differentiation will be performed on baseline and subsequent prostate biopsy specimens. This report summarizes the primary objectives, research methods and the randomized subjects in this important clinical trial.