Oral contraceptive use and myocardial infarction

Acute coronary syndrome patterns in the Young: risk factor profile and in-hospital outcomes in a tertiary referral hospital in Kenya

INTRODUCTION

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) accounts for coronary artery disease (CAD) -related morbidity and mortality. There has been growing concern about the rising incidence of ACS among young individuals globally both in developed and developing countries, including Sub-Saharan Africa. This group's phenotypic characteristics; risk factors and clinical outcomes are not well described. contextual and regional studies are necessary to understand the magnitude of ACS among young Individuals and help highlight challenges and opportunities for improved ACS outcomes in the region. The study aimed to describe the demographic and clinical characteristics of young individuals hospitalized with ACS and report on in-hospital outcomes.

METHODOLOGY

This single-center retrospective study was conducted at the Aga Khan University Hospital, Nairobi. Medical records of all young individuals hospitalized with ACS from 30th June 2020 to 1st May 2023 were reviewed. We defined young individuals as 50 years or below. Categorical variables were reported as frequencies and proportions, and compared with Pearson chi- square or Fisher's exact tests. Continuous variables were reported as means or medians and compared with independent t-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests. P- value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Among 506 patients hospitalized with ACS, (n = 138,27.2%) were aged 50 years and below. The study population was male (n = 107, 79.9%) and African(n = 82,61.2%) predominant with a median age of 46.5 years (IQR 41.0-50.0). Hypertension (n = 101,75.4%) was noted in most study participants. More than half of the cohort were smokers (n = 69,51.5%) having a family history of premature ASCVD(n = 70,52.2%) and were on lipid-lowering therapy(n = 68,50.7%) prior to presentation. ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) was the most common clinical manifestation of ACS (n = 77, 57.5%). Of the significant coronary artery disease (n = 75,56.0%), the majority of the individuals had single vessel disease (n = 60, 80%) with a predilection of left anterior deciding artery(n = 47,62.6%). The Main cause of ACS was atherosclerosis (n = 41,54.6%). The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 46.0 (± 12.4). The in-hospital mortality was (n = 2, 1.5%).

CONCLUSION

This study highlights that young individuals contribute to a relatively large proportion of patients presenting with ACS at our center. The most common presentation was STEMI. The principal cause was atherosclerosis. The findings of this study highlight the importance of developing systems of care that enable the early detection of CAD. Traditional cardiovascular risk factors were prevalent and modifiable, thus targets of intervention.

Therapeutic, prophylactic, untoward, and contraceptive effects of combined oral contraceptives: catholic teaching, natural law, and the principle of double effect when deciding to prescribe and use

Combined oral contraceptives (COC) have been demonstrated to have significant benefits for the treatment and prevention of disease. These medications also are associated with untoward health effects, and they may be directly contraceptive. Prescribers and users must compare and weigh the intended beneficial health effects against foreseeable but unintended possible adverse effects in their decisions to prescribe and use. Additionally, those who intend to abide by Catholic teachings must consider prohibitions against contraception. Ethical judgments concerning both health benefits and contraception are approached in this essay through an overview of the therapeutic, prophylactic, untoward, and contraceptive effects of COC and discussion of magisterial and traditional Catholic teachings from natural law. Discerning through the principle of double effect, proportionate reason, and evidence gathered from the sciences, medical and moral conclusions are drawn that we believe to be fully compliant with good medicine and Catholic teaching.

Effects of an oral contraceptive containing 30 mcg ethinyl estradiol and 2 mg dienogest on lipid metabolism during 1 year of conventional or extended-cycle use

BACKGROUND

The effects of extended regimens of combined oral contraceptives (COC) on lipid parameters are largely unknown. The present study compared the effects of a COC containing 30 mcg ethinyl estradiol and 2 mg dienogest (EE/DNG) in conventional and extended-cycle regimen over 1 year.

STUDY DESIGN

Lipid parameters were measured in 59 women treated with EE/DNG either conventionally (21+7 days) or in extended-cycle regimen (84+7 days). Blood samples were taken in a control cycle and at 3 and 12 months of treatment.

RESULTS

The mean levels of total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol and HDL(2) cholesterol underwent modest to moderate significant increases over time, while the significant increase in triglycerides and VLDL cholesterol was more pronounced with both regimens. LDL cholesterol decreased slightly in both regimen groups, whereas lipoprotein(a) was transiently decreased at 3 months only in the extended-cycle group. The changes reached a steady-state at latest at 3 months, but did not exceed the given normal ranges for any of the parameters. Notably, except for lipoprotein(a), the changes in mean lipid levels were not significantly different in the conventional and the extended-cycle regimen at 3 or 12 months of treatment.

CONCLUSION

Use of EE/DNG in conventional or extended-cycle regimen resulted in comparable changes of lipid parameters.

Gender differences in risk factors for coronary heart disease

Coronary heart disease (CHD), traditionally considered a male disease, is also a major threat to women. This review article addresses independent risk factors for CHD that are specific for women as well as non-gender-specific risk factors and how their effects differ between men and women. Although polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) in women is associated with an adverse metabolic risk profile, current evidence regarding future risk of CHD is conflicting. Preeclampsia is consistently associated with higher risk of CHD later in life. Menopause is associated with an increased risk of CHD, and the earlier the onset of menopause, the larger the risk. Existing data on postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) was inconclusive with regard to possible protection when HT is initiated close to menopause in young peri- or postmenopausal women. Evidence on use of low-dose oral contraceptives strongly suggests no increased risk of CHD. Although levels of physical inactivity are similar for men and women, the higher prevalences of hypertension, diabetes, and obesity in older women portends a greater risk in women than in men. Additionally, risk factors like smoking, hypertriglyceridemia and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels have greater impact in women than in men. This review indicates that acknowledgement of non-gender-specific risk factors in addition to those that are unique to women would help optimize diagnosis, treatment and earlier prevention of CHD in women. Further research is needed to ascertain if incorporating these gender-specific risks into a clinically used risk stratification model would change outcome in women.

A prospective study of oral contraceptive use and risk of myocardial infarction among Swedish women

OBJECTIVE

To determine the risk for incident myocardial infarction (MI) in women exposed to modern formulations of oral contraceptives (OCs).

DESIGN

Population-based, prospective cohort study begun in 1991 with follow-up through 2002 for an average of 11 years.

PATIENT(S)

A total of 48,321 Swedish women aged 30-49 randomly selected from the population residing in the Uppsala Health Care Region of Sweden in 1990-91.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Fatal and nonfatal MI ascertained through linkages with nationwide health registries for death, hospitalization, and emigration.

RESULT(S)

There were 214 incident cases of MI. Compared with never users, neither former (relative risk, 1.0; 95% confidence interval, 0.7-1.4) nor current (relative risk, 0.7; 95% confidence interval, 0.4-1.4) OC users at study enrollment had an elevated risk of future MI in models adjusted for coronary heart disease risk factors. Risk of MI was not elevated by prolonged use or in subgroups defined by characteristics of the women or types of OC.

CONCLUSION(S)

Use of OC was not associated with an increased risk of MI in this prospective study, in which most current users of OC were taking low-dose estrogen and second- or third-generation progestins.

Mechanisms of sex steroids

The discussion on the risks of hormone therapy supports the search for alternative drugs such as selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs). These compounds are suitable for special preventive goals, but cannot be expected to replace the use of estrogens in patients with estrogen deficiency. The development of selective progesterone receptor modulators (SPRMs) which has to resolve various problems, might be a promising approach. Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) with natural estrogens remains the measure of choice for treatment of symptoms caused by estrogen deficiency. Recent findings suggest that the additional progestogen which is used for the protection of the endometrium, plays a crucial role with regard to the risk of breast cancer and cardiovascular disease. As surrogate parameters cannot predict the extent of risks, suitable tools for the selection of progestogens with the least potential for causing adverse effects, are urgently needed. Experimental, clinical and epidemiological data suggest that the elevation in breast cancer risk is due to the proliferative effect of estrogens on breast tissue which is largely enhanced by progestogens. A short-term in vivo-test might be helpful for the evaluation of proliferative effects of estrogen-progestogen preparations. Similarly, a strictly standardized in vivo-test for the assessment of the atherogenic potential of estrogen-progestogen preparations might help to select the preparations with the lowest risk for ischemic diseases. The available data suggest that it is probably not the androgenic but the glucocorticoid activity of a progestogen which plays a role in the development of cardiovascular disease. Progestogens with glucocorticoid effects may up-regulate the thrombin receptor in the vessel wall which is involved in the development of atherosclerosis and stimulation of extrinsic coagulation.

Risks and benefits of oral contraceptive pills

In the more than 40 years since the combined oral contraceptive pill was first marketed, much information has been obtained as to its risks. Considerably less publicity has been given to the balancing benefits that have also emerged. There has been an increasing realization that the risks are focused in those women with recognised risk factors, meaning that the remainder can use the product with increasing reassurance. The doses of both hormones have also been lowered considerably since the early years. Thus, it can be a rational decision by a fully informed woman to use this form of contraception.

Occlusive vascular diseases in oral contraceptive users. Epidemiology, pathology and mechanisms

Despite being an unprecedented departure from normal physiology, the combined oral contraceptive is not only highly effective, but it also has a remarkably good safety record. Concerns over safety persist, though, particularly with regard to venous thromboembolism (VTE), stroke and myocardial infarction (MI). Epidemiological studies consistently show an increase in risk of VTE, but the results are more contentious with regard to arterial diseases. Despite 40 years of research, the mechanisms behind these adverse effects are not understood. In this review, we integrate information from published studies of the epidemiology and pathology of the occlusive vascular diseases and their risk factors to identify likely explanations for pathogenesis in oral contraceptive users. Oral contraceptives induce both prothrombotic and fibrinolytic changes in haemostatic factors and an imbalance in haemostasis is likely to be important in oral contraceptive-induced VTE. The complexity of the changes involved and the difficulty of ascribing clinical significance has meant that uncertainty persists. A seriously under-researched area concerns vascular changes in oral contraceptive users. Histologically, endothelial and intimal proliferation have been identified in women exposed to high plasma estrogen concentrations and these lesions are associated with thrombotic occlusion. Other structural changes may result in increased vascular permeability, loss of vascular tone and venous stasis. With regard to arterial disease risk, epidemiological information relating to dose effects and joint effects with other risk factors, and studies of pathology and changes in risk factors, suggests that oral contraceptive use per se does not cause arterial disease. It can, nevertheless, synergise very powerfully with subclinical endothelial damage to promote arterial occlusion. Accordingly, the prothrombotic effects of the oral contraceptive estrogen intervene in a cycle of endothelial damage and repair which would otherwise remain clinically silent or would ultimately progress - in, for example, the presence of cigarette smoking or hypertension - to atherosclerosis. Future work in this area should focus on modification of the effects of established risk factors by oral contraceptive use rather than modification of the supposed risk of oral contraceptive use by established risk factors. Attempts to understand vascular occlusion in oral contraceptive users in terms of the general features of VTE or with reference to atherosclerosis may be limiting, and future work needs to acknowledge that such occlusions may have unique features. Unequivocal identification of the mechanisms involved would contribute considerably to the alleviation of fears over vascular disease and to the development of even safer formulations.

Cardiovascular events associated with different combined oral contraceptives: a review of current data

Studies of combined oral contraceptive (COC) use and cardiovascular disease have been conducted against a background of low cardiovascular risk in young women, changing COC composition and changing user selection and monitoring. Studies of myocardial infarction have found inconsistent results, possibly because of differences in the prevalence of risk factors (particularly smoking and raised blood pressure) in the populations studied. In the absence of a history of smoking and other conventional risk factors, current users of modern COCs probably do not have an increased risk of myocardial infarction. Neither are former users at risk. Evidence for important differences in the risk of myocardial infarction between formulations is weak and contradictory. Current users of low estrogen dose COCs have a small increased risk of ischaemic stroke although most of the risk occurs in women with other risk factors (notably smoking, hypertension and probably a history of migraine). Former users of COCs do not have an increased risk of ischaemic stroke. There is insufficient information to determine whether major differences in the risk of ischaemic stroke exist between products. Current users appear to have a modestly elevated risk of haemorrhagic stroke, mainly in women older than 35 years; former users do not. Data examining the risk of haemorrhagic stroke in current COC users with other risk factors are very sparse, as are those relating to the haemorrhagic stroke risk associated with particular COCs. Numerous studies have found, with remarkable consistency, an elevated risk of venous thromboembolism among current users of low estrogen dose COCs. The risk is substantially elevated among women with various inherited clotting factor defects. The effects in COC users with other risk factors for venous thrombosis tend to be less pronounced and more inconsistent. A number of studies have found higher relative risks among current users of low estrogen dose COCs containing desogestrel or gestodene, than among users of similar products containing levonorgestrel. A number of explanations, in terms of bias or confounding, have been proposed for these clinically small differences. At best, empirical evidence for these explanations, is weak. The risk of cardiovascular disease of any description is low in COC users. Women can minimise, and possibly eliminate entirely, their arterial risks by not smoking and by having their blood pressure checked before using a COC (in order to avoid its use if raised blood pressure is discovered). Users may decrease their venous thromboembolic risk by their choice of COC preparation although the effects will be modest.

Effect of desogestrel-containing oral contraceptives on vascular reactivity and catecholamine levels

The modifications induced by new oral contraceptives (OC) on blood pressure, great vessel vascular reactivity by color Doppler, and catecholamine levels were investigated. Young healthy women not taking OC (n = 22; controls) or receiving, for > or = 6 months, OC containing desogestrel with either 30 micrograms (n = 14) or 20 micrograms of EE (n = 8) were enrolled. Blood pressure measured at rest in supine position was similar between controls and OC users. The pulsatility index (PI), an indirect index of resistance to blood flow, of axillary artery was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in 30 micrograms than in 20 micrograms EE OC users or controls. A similar trend, albeit not significant, was observed for the internal carotid artery PI. Norepinephrine (p < 0.01) and dopamine (p < 0.05) but not epinephrine levels, were lower in 30 micrograms EE OC users than in 20 micrograms EE OC users or controls. Thus, both 20 micrograms and 30 micrograms EE OC had no negative effect on blood pressure, but the 30 micrograms EE OC tended to increase great vessel resistance to blood flow, independently of catecholamine levels.

Safety evaluation of modern oral contraceptives. Effects on lipoprotein and carbohydrate metabolism

An ideal oral contraceptive should either be neutral as regards metabolic risk markers for arterial disease or should only change them in directions that would be expected to reduce risk. Depending on their formulation, modern low dose oral contraceptives affect systems such as hemostasis, lipoprotein metabolism, and glucose and insulin metabolism. Some of these actions would be expected to decrease the risk of arterial disease and some might be expected to increase risk. Despite these associations there is at present no justification for widespread metabolic screening as a strategy to further improve oral contraceptive safety. Recent developments in atherosclerosis research support the introduction of progestogens such as desogestrel that allow the estrogenic increase in high density lipoprotein levels to persist and that may cause less of an elevation in plasma insulin responses to glucose. The predicted benefit of these formulations in terms of arterial disease is difficult to demonstrate in an epidemiological setting because of the rarity of the disease in young women.