Bone density among long-term users of medroxyprogesterone acetate as a contraceptive

Proandrogenic and Antiandrogenic Progestins in Transgender Youth: Differential Effects on Body Composition and Bone Metabolism

CONTEXT

Progestins can be used to attenuate endogenous hormonal effects in late-pubertal transgender (trans) adolescents (Tanner stage B4/5 and G4/5). Currently, no data are available on the effects of progestins on the development of bone mass or body composition in trans youth.

OBJECTIVE

To study prospectively the evolution of body composition and bone mass in late-pubertal trans adolescents using the proandrogenic or antiandrogenic progestins lynestrenol (L) and cyproterone acetate (CA), respectively.

DESIGN AND OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Forty-four trans boys (Tanner B4/5) and 21 trans girls (Tanner G4/5) were treated with L or CA for 11.6 (4 to 40) and 10.6 (5 to 31) months, respectively. Anthropometry, grip strength, body composition, and bone mass, size, and density were determined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and peripheral quantitative computed tomography before the start of progestin and before addition of cross-sex hormones.

RESULTS

Using L, lean mass [+3.2 kg (8.6%)] and grip strength [+3 kg (10.6%)] significantly increased, which coincided with a more masculine body shape in trans boys. Trans girls showed loss of lean mass [-2.2 kg (4.7%)], gain of fat mass [+1.5 kg (9.4%)], and decreased grip strength Z scores. CA limited normal bone expansion and impeded pubertal bone mass accrual, mostly at the lumbar spine [Z score: -0.765 to -1.145 (P = 0.002)]. L did not affect physiological bone development.

CONCLUSION

Proandrogenic and antiandrogenic progestins induce body composition changes in line with the desired appearance within 1 year of treatment. Bone health, especially at the lumbar spine, is of concern in trans girls, as bone mass accrual is severely affected by androgen suppressive therapy.

A pilot study examining short-term changes in bone mineral density among class 3 obese users of depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate

OBJECTIVE

To examine changes in lumbar spine-bone mineral density (LS-BMD) among normal weight (body mass index [BMI] = 18.5-24.9 kg/m(2)), Class 1-2 obese (BMI = 30-39.9 kg/m(2)), and Class 3 obese (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m(2)) women utilising depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA).

METHODS

Five normal-weight, five Class 1-2 obese, and five Class 3 obese women received subcutaneous injections of DMPA-SC at baseline and 12 weeks later. Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) scans were performed at baseline and 18 weeks after the first injection for determination of LS-BMD and analysis of fat content. Bimonthly oestradiol (E2) levels were measured by immunoassay methods for 26 weeks.

RESULTS

There were no significant demographic or LS-BMD differences among the three BMI groups. Significant differences at baseline were as expected among the three groups with respect to BMI and associated parameters (mean % total body fat, absolute fat, and weight). When used as their own controls, significant changes in LS-BMD, % body fat and absolute fat determined by DEXA occurred among all three BMI strata. Class 1-2 obese and Class 3 obese women were more likely to experience E2 fluctuations, but short-term changes in LS-BMD were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

DMPA-SC administration affects L-spine bone health similarly regardless of BMI status.

Bone mineral density assessment in premenopausal women

In the absence of fragility fractures, low bone mineral density may reflect attainment of a lower peak bone mass in comparison with the young adult mean value. It is necessary to distinguish between low peak bone mass and a systemic disorder resulting in low bone mineral density and skeletal fragility. Low peak bone mass in the absence of fragility fracture or progressive bone loss may not require pharmacological intervention. However, systemic disorders contributing to bone loss do require diagnosis and intervention. Common causes of low bone density in premenopausal women include ovulatory disturbances and low body weight. Other diseases, conditions or medications may also contribute to bone loss and these should be identified and treated if present. Fracture risk is reduced by lifestyle changes and pharmacological intervention in those with glucocorticoid-induced bone loss. Discontinuing depo medroxyprogesterone acetate use has been associated with improvements in bone mineral density. Bone mineral density alone is insufficient for the diagnosis of osteoporosis in premenopausal women in the absence of fragility fractures. Bone mineral density testing should only be performed in premenopausal women in the presence of approved indications.

Inadequate vitamin D status in adolescents with substantial bone mineral density loss during the use of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate injectable contraceptive: a pilot study

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To examine vitamin D and parathormone (PTH) levels in adolescents who experienced substantial bone mineral density (BMD) loss during depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) use.

DESIGN

A non-randomized, multi-center study, during which DMPA was administered every 12 weeks and evaluation of lumbar spine and hip BMD by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) was conducted every 6 months. A blood sample for vitamin D and PTH measurements was obtained from adolescents who experienced >5% BMD loss. Vitamin D deficiency was defined as 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) level of <20 ng/mL, insufficiency as 25OHD level of 20-30 ng/mL, and sufficiency as 25OHD level of >30 ng/mL.

RESULTS

Evaluation of vitamin D and PTH was carried out in 15 participants who experienced BMD loss of > or = 5% during DMPA use. At initiation of DMPA, participants had mean (+SE) age 17+1 years, gynecologic age 61+4 months, and body mass index 24+1.5 kg/m2. Racial/ethnic distribution was: Caucasian--7 girls, Hispanic--4 girls, African-American--3 girls, and other--1 girl. Six participants had BMD loss of >5% after 2 DMPA injections, five after 3 injections, one after 5 injections, one after 8 injections, one after 10 injections, and one after 13 injections. Only one girl (7%) had sufficient vitamin D. The other participants had vitamin D insufficiency (50%) or deficiency (43%). Participants' mean (+SE) PTH was 22+4 pg/mL (reference range 7-53 pg/mL), and mean (+SE) 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D was 56+5 pg/mL (reference range 22-67 pg/mL).

CONCLUSIONS

Inadequate vitamin D status was evident among the majority of female adolescents who experienced a substantial BMD loss while using DMPA.

Biopsychosocial variables associated with substantial bone mineral density loss during the use of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate in adolescents: adolescents who lost 5% or more from baseline vs. those who lost less than 5%

BACKGROUND

It is unclear why some adolescents experience substantial bone mineral density (BMD) loss, while others experience a minimal decrease during depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) use. We examined biopsychosocial factors in adolescents who experienced ≥5% BMD loss from baseline compared with adolescents who experienced <5% BMD loss during DMPA use.

STUDY DESIGN

A multicenter, prospective, nonrandomized study of 181 female adolescents who initiated DMPA for contraception was conducted. BMD (by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry) and serum estradiol were measured at initiation and every 6 months for 240 weeks of DMPA use.

RESULTS

Half of participants experienced BMD loss of ≥5% from baseline at the hip, and a quarter experienced BMD loss of ≥5% at the lumbar spine (BMD substantial losers, SL). Hip and lumbar spine BMD-SL received a significantly greater number of DMPA injections than non-SL (p<.001). Decreased estradiol levels did not statistically differ between BMD loss subgroups. Hip BMD-SL had significantly lower baseline body mass index (BMI) than non-SL (p=.002), and there was an inverse relationship between weight gain and degree of BMD loss. Mean calcium intake was significantly lower (p<.05) in hip BMD-SL, and reported alcohol use was significantly higher (p<.05) in lumbar spine BMD-SL compared with non-SL.

CONCLUSIONS

BMD loss of ≥5% was more common at the hip than at the lumbar spine among adolescents using DMPA. Decreased serum estradiol levels did not correlate with magnitude of BMD loss. Lower BMI and calcium intake and greater alcohol use were associated with greater BMD loss in adolescents using DMPA.

Hormonal contraception and blood lead levels in inner-city adolescent girls

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Physiological states of estrogen deficiency can lead to bone demineralization. Lead is stored in bone and may be released into blood during demineralization. The contraceptive injection depomedroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) is associated with estrogen deficiency and bone demineralization and, we hypothesized, may be associated with toxic blood lead levels in adolescents at high risk for lead exposure. We sought to compare blood lead levels in inner-city adolescent girls using DMPA with levels in those using oral contraceptive pills (OCP) and those taking no hormones and to examine the influence of lead exposure and reproductive history on blood lead levels in the total sample.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey of a clinical convenience sample.

SETTING

Inner-city adolescent clinic in an academic medical center.

PARTICIPANTS

174 females aged 13-21 years; 86% minority ethnicity.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Measurement of blood lead levels and an 82-item questionnaire examining lead exposure and reproductive history.

RESULTS

28 subjects were using DMPA, 25 used OCPs, and 121 used no hormones. Mean blood lead level in the total sample of 174 was 1.6 mug/dL, SD = 1.1. Many subjects had environmental risk factors for lead exposure and 15% reported one or more past pregnancies. Mean blood lead levels for subjects with the various environmental and reproductive risk factors ranged from 1.2 microg/dL to 2.0 microg/dL and were not different from levels for subjects without such risk factors. Mean blood lead levels for subjects in the 3 hormonal groups were significantly different (2.1 vs. 1.2 vs.1.5 microg/dL in DMPA, OCP, and no hormone groups respectively, P = 0.007). We dichotomized the blood lead levels into "High" > or =4 microg/dL, or "Low" <4 microg/dL. We found that a significantly higher proportion of girls using DMPA (4/28) than those not using any hormone (2/121) had "High" levels (P = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite reported high-risk exposure to lead and the possibility of long-term accumulation of lead in bone, we did not find elevated blood levels in our sample. However, DMPA-treated girls were significantly more likely to have higher mean blood lead levels than OCP users and non-hormone users. In addition, DMPA users were more likely to have blood lead levels more than two standard deviations above the mean for the sample as a whole than untreated girls. Further studies are needed to examine low-level lead poisoning in adolescents and the consequences of contraceptive choices on bone health.

Bone density recovery after depot medroxyprogesterone acetate injectable contraception use

BACKGROUND

While depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) is a highly effective contraceptive used by millions of women, its use is associated with bone mineral density (BMD) loss, raising concerns about long-term risk of osteoporosis and/or fractures.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a systematic review of studies published in PubMed from 1996 to 2006, evaluating changes in BMD after discontinuation of DMPA. Ten primary clinical or observational studies were identified addressing this issue.

RESULTS

BMD consistently returned toward or to baseline values following DMPA discontinuation in women of all ages. This recovery in BMD was seen as early as 24 weeks after stopping therapy and persisted for as long as women were followed up; BMD in past DMPA users was similar to that in nonusers.

CONCLUSIONS

Bone loss occurring with DMPA use is reversible and is not likely to be an important risk factor for low bone density and fractures in older women, although data on fracture risk in DMPA users are lacking.

Bone status after cessation of use of injectable progestin contraceptives

BACKGROUND

Women using injectable progestin contraceptives (IPCs) have lower bone mineral density than nonusers. We assessed whether bone loss is completely reversible after cessation of IPC use, whether different IPCs have different effects and whether effects vary by age at first use.

STUDY DESIGN

In a cross-sectional study in Cape Town, South Africa, 3487 premenopausal black and mixed race women aged 18-44 years were interviewed for information on contraceptive history and risk factors for decreased bone mineral density, and ultrasound measurements of the left calcaneus were taken. Adjusted means of the ultrasound measures for categories of IPC use were obtained using multivariable linear regression.

RESULTS

Current users of IPCs had the lowest ultrasound measures, while the measures of women who had ceased IPC use at least 2-3 years previously were similar to or greater than those of never users of IPCs. The effects of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate and norethisterone enanthate were similar. The calcaneus measures were unrelated to age at which use began after control for confounding factors.

CONCLUSION

The data suggest that bone loss during IPC use is reversible and that this loss of bone is completely recovered several years after cessation of use.

Bone mineral density in women aged 25–35 years receiving depot medroxyprogesterone acetate: recovery following discontinuation

INTRODUCTION

This 7-year, prospective, matched-cohort, clinical study evaluated the effects of intramuscular depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) (150 mg/mL) on bone mineral density (BMD) in women aged 25-35 years.

METHODS

Bone mineral density changes in new DMPA-IM users (n=248) were compared with those in women using nonhormonal contraception (n=360) for up to 240 weeks of treatment and 96 weeks of posttreatment follow-up (in subjects receiving >or=1 dose).

RESULTS

At week 240 of treatment, mean percentage changes from baseline in DMPA-IM vs. nonhormonal subjects were: -5.16% (n=21) vs. +0.19% (n=65), total hip (p<.001); -5.38% (n=33) vs. +0.43% (n=105), lumbar spine (p<.001). At week 96 posttreatment, these values were: -0.20% (n=25) vs. +0.84% (n=43), total hip (p=.047); -1.19% (n=41) vs. +0.47% (n=66), lumbar spine (p=.017).

CONCLUSIONS

These results show BMD declines during DMPA-IM use; following discontinuation, significant increases in BMD occur through 96 weeks posttreatment.

Effects of the long-term use of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate as hormonal contraceptive on bone mineral density and biochemical markers of bone remodeling

PURPOSE AND METHOD

Our objective is to evaluate the effects of the long-term use of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) as a method of contraception on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone remodeling. Forty women (21-44 years old) who used DMPA for contraception for <1, 1-2 and >5 years, in addition to 20 age-matched healthy women (nonusers), participated in this study. Lumbar spine BMD (LS-BMD) was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptionmetry. Serum osteocalcin (OC), a bone formation marker, was measured by enzyme amplification sorbent immunoassay. Urinary deoxypyridinoline (DPD), a bone resorption marker, was determined by enzyme immunoassay.

RESULTS

Serum OC and urinary DPD levels in women who used DMPA for <1, 1-2 and >5 years were significantly increased compared to the corresponding levels in nonusers. The increase of both biomarkers was more pronounced with longer duration of use. LS-BMD was significantly decreased in women on long-term DMPA use compared to LS-BMD in nonusers. The mean percentage decrease of LS-BMD in women who used DMPA for 1-2 and >5 years was 9% and 11.8%, respectively. LS-BMD was negatively correlated with serum OC and urinary DPD in women who used DMPA. On the other hand, LS-BMD and bone turnover were not significantly different between women who used DMPA for <1 year and nonusers.

CONCLUSION

Long-term use of DMPA (>2 years) had a significant adverse effect on BMD and induced increased bone turnover, as evidenced by a significant increase in biochemical indices of bone formation and resorption. The measurement of LS-BMD and of biomarkers of bone turnover may be recommended in women aged above 40 years and who used DMPA for a long duration (2-5 years).

Progestogen-only contraception and bone mineral density: a systematic review

Questions have been raised about the effects of progestogen-only contraceptive use on bone health, particularly among young women who have not yet reached peak bone mass and perimenopausal women who may be starting to lose bone mass. We conducted a systematic review that evaluated the association between progestogen-only contraceptive use and fracture risk or bone mineral density (BMD). We identified 39 articles from MEDLINE and EMBASE, published through July 2005. One study reported that depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) users were more likely to experience stress fractures than nonusers; this association was not statistically significant after controlling for baseline bone density. In cross-sectional studies, the mean BMD in DMPA users was usually below that of nonusers, but within 1 SD. In longitudinal studies, BMD generally decreased more over time among DMPA users than among nonusers, but women gained BMD upon discontinuation of DMPA. Limited evidence suggested that use of progestogen-only contraceptives other than DMPA did not affect BMD.

Bone mineral density and depot medroxyprogesterone acetate

INTRODUCTION

Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) suppresses pituitary gonadotrophin output, thus, suppressing ovulation. Estrogen production from the ovary is also strongly inhibited, and the resulting estrogen deficiency has a detrimental impact on bone. Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate may be particularly detrimental in young women, as it may impede attainment of peak bone mass, and switching to a different contraceptive is recommended. However, the effect of sequential use of DMPA with other contraceptives in this age group has not been investigated.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional analysis of 218 DMPA users who were 20 years or older (mean, 31 years, +/-8.9 SD) at the time of bone mineral density (BMD) estimation. The majority of women had used one or more contraceptive beside DMPA. The most commonly used alternative contraceptive was the oral combined pill (OCP). It was used by 65% of women (n=143) and for an average duration of 6 years. A logistic regression model was used to estimate the association between potential risk factors and low bone mass.

RESULTS

The prevalence of low bone mass at either hip or spine (T< or =1) was 41%. The prevalence of a T score below -2.5 was 5%, and 45% of women had already sustained one fracture. Younger age was associated with higher BMD [odds ratios (ORs), 0.054; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.007-0.431]. However, this protective effect of age was lost once the interaction between the duration of both DMPA and OCP was introduced into the model (OR for low BMD, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.09-1.8). The use of DMPA first before ever use of OCP was particularly detrimental to BMD (OR, 3.94; 95% CI, 1.08-14.0). On the contrary, body mass index was positively associated with BMD (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.8-0.9). No other demographic or anamnestic variables significantly predicted the presence of low BMD in this group of young women. This group of DMPA users appear to be at a very high risk of both low BMD and fractures, possibly independently of DMPA use. This needs to be considered when writing guidelines for risk assessment.

CONCLUSION

The use of DMPA before achievement of peak bone mass may be particularly detrimental to bone, but switching DMPA with the OCP in these women does not seem to confer specific benefit in terms of bone density. This needs to be taken into consideration when a change in contraceptive is considered purely for the sake of bone protection.

Advances in the management of endometriosis: an update for clinicians

Endometriosis is a chronic and recurrent disease characterized by the presence and proliferation of endometrial tissue outside the uterine cavity, which occurs in approximately 10% of women of reproductive age. In this estrogen-dependent disorder, lesions become inactive and gradually undergo regression during states of ovarian down-regulation, such as amenorrhoea or menopause. The impact of endometriosis includes impaired fertility potential, as well as symptoms of dysmenorrhoea, dyspareunia and chronic non-menstrual pain, all of which adversely affect quality of life. Management of endometriosis focuses on pain relief and includes medical and surgical treatment. Pharmacologic therapies currently in use include combination oral contraceptives (COCs), danazol, GnRH analogues and progestins. Although some agents show efficacy in relieving pain, all differ in their side effects, making it difficult to achieve a balance between efficacy and safety. Efficacy has been demonstrated with danazol or GnRH analogues; however, treatment is limited to 6 months because of significant metabolic side effects. Alternatives for longer-term management of symptoms include add-back therapy with GnRH analogues, COCs or progestins. Newer options for treatment of endometriosis include depot medroxyprogesterone acetate subcutaneous injection, as well as several agents under investigation that may prove to have therapeutic potential.

Effects of oral contraceptives on bone mineral density

Osteoporosis is a major health problem that leads to a high incidence of spine, radial, and hip fractures. It is now well recognized that a chronically hypoestrogenic state increases bone turnover that, in turn, causes a critical decrease in bone mineral density (BMD), an important determinant of fracture risk. During the premenopausal period, hypogonadism can have deleterious effects on skeletal health by reducing peak bone mass or inducing precocious bone loss. In young women, hypothalamic amenorrhea, caused by gonadotropin-releasing hormone pulsatility dysregulation, is often associated with bone loss. Although the relationship between hypothalamic amenorrhea and bone density is not completely understood, the most plausible intervention for this disorder at the moment seems to be the use of hormone replacement. Oral contraceptives are associated with an improvement in BMD if assumed upon the onset of anovulatory cycles and, therefore, estrogen deficiency, but confer no benefit in healthy women with normal ovarian function. In perimenopausal oligomenorrheic women, the use of oral contraceptives seems to have bone-sparing effects. In conclusion, the protective role of oral contraceptives on bone density is biologically plausible, since this treatment represents a replacement therapy with continuous exposure to exogenous estrogens.

Management of Low Bone Mineral Density in Premenopausal Women

OBJECTIVE

To review evidence for management of low bone density in premenopausal women and to establish practical guidelines for management of low bone density in this population by family physicians.

METHOD

A search of MEDLINE for relevant articles published between January 1990 and May 2004 was conducted. Articles retrieved were graded by level of evidence. Recommendations for diagnosis and therapy were based on evidence from randomized controlled trials and expert consensus.

RESULTS

Low bone density in premenopausal women is not associated with the same increased risk of fracture seen in older women. In the absence of fragility fractures and loss of height, it may be a reflection of low peak bone mass and may represent the normal variation in bone mineral density (BMD). Women may have low bone density secondary to an underlying skeletal or systemic disorder. Common causes of low bone density in premenopausal women include ovulatory disturbances and low body weight.

CONCLUSION

Osteoporosis is diagnosed in the premenopausal female population in the presence of fragility fractures and is not based solely on the results of BMD testing. Secondary causes of bone loss should be excluded, and any underlying condition contributing to low bone density should be corrected. Antiresorptive therapy has been evaluated only in those premenopausal women who are on glucocorticoid therapy and in those with primary hyperparathyroidism. Only in these conditions has antiresorptive therapy been shown to improve BMD.

Bone mineral density changes over two years in first-time users of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate

OBJECTIVE

To compare longitudinal changes in bone mineral density (BMD) among first-time depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) users to women using no hormonal contraception, and evaluate user characteristics associated with that BMD change.

DESIGN

Prospective longitudinal study.

SETTING

Healthy volunteers in an academic research environment.

PATIENT(S)

Women, aged 18 to 35, choosing DMPA for contraception (n = 178) and women using no hormonal contraception (n = 145).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Hip and spine BMD measured, at three-month intervals for 24 months, by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry.

RESULT(S)

Mean hip BMD declined 2.8% (SE = 0.034) 12 months following DMPA initiation and 5.8% (SE = 0.096) after 24 months. Mean spine (L1-L3) BMD declined 3.5% (SE = 0.022) and 5.7% (SE = 0.034), respectively, after one and two years of DMPA use. Mean hip and spine BMD of control participants changed less than 0.9% over the same period. Among DMPA users, body mass index (BMI) change was inversely associated with BMD change at the hip, but not at the spine. Calcium intake, physical activity, and smoking did not influence BMD change in either group.

CONCLUSION(S)

Hip and spine BMD declined after one DMPA injection and this decline continued with each subsequent injection for 24 months. With the exception of increasing BMI among DMPA users, no user characteristics offered protection against DMPA-related BMD loss.

Effects of hormonal contraception on bone mineral density after 24 months of use

OBJECTIVE

To measure the effect of 24 months of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate use on bone mineral density compared with oral contraception (pills) and nonhormonal contraception.

METHODS

Women aged 18-33 years self-selected oral contraception, depot medroxyprogesterone acetate, or nonhormonal contraception (controls). Those selecting pills were randomized to formulations containing either 35 microg ethinyl estradiol and norethindrone or 30 microg ethinyl estradiol and desogestrel. Controls were frequency matched on age and race/ethnicity to hormonal contraception users. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry of the lumbar spine (L1-L4) was performed at baseline, 12 months, and 24 months. Percent change in bone mineral density was analyzed by using analysis of covariance, adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, weight-bearing exercise, calcium intake, smoking status, and body mass index.

RESULTS

Of the 191 women making up the final sample, 86 used pills, 47 used depot medroxyprogesterone acetate, and 58 used nonhormonal contraception. Women using depot medroxyprogesterone acetate for 24 months experienced, on average, a 5.7% loss in bone mineral density, with a 3.2% loss occurring between months 12 and 24. On average, users of desogestrel pills experienced a 2.6% loss in bone mineral density after 24 months. Bonferroni-adjusted pairwise comparisons demonstrated that bone mineral density changes from baseline to 24 months among depot medroxyprogesterone acetate users differed significantly from changes experienced by either of the pill groups or the control group. Changes in bone mineral density among users of either pill did not significantly differ from each other or from controls.

CONCLUSION

Loss of bone mineral density associated with depot medroxyprogesterone acetate use appears to be linear during the first 2 years of use. Shifts in bone mineral density among pill users were not significant when compared with controls.

Treatment of menopause-associated vasomotor symptoms: position statement of The North American Menopause Society

OBJECTIVE

To create an evidence-based position statement regarding the treatment of vasomotor symptoms associated with menopause.

DESIGN

The North American Menopause Society (NAMS) enlisted clinicians and researchers acknowledged to be experts in the field of menopause-associated vasomotor symptoms to review the evidence obtained from the medical literature and develop a document for final approval by the NAMS Board of Trustees.

RESULTS

For mild hot flashes, lifestyle-related strategies such as keeping the core body temperature cool, participating in regular exercise, and using paced respiration have shown some efficacy without adverse effects. Among nonprescription remedies, clinical trial results are insufficient to either support or refute efficacy for soy foods and isoflavone supplements (from either soy or red clover), black cohosh, or vitamin E; however, no serious side effects have been associated with short-term use of these therapies. Single clinical trials have found no benefit for dong quai, evening primrose oil, ginseng, a Chinese herbal mixture, acupuncture, or magnet therapy. Few data support the efficacy of topical progesterone cream; safety concerns should be the same as for other progestogen preparations. No clinical trials have been conducted on the use of licorice for hot flashes. Among nonhormonal prescription options, the antidepressants venlafaxine, paroxetine, and fluoxetine and the anticonvulsant gabapentin have demonstrated some efficacy for treating hot flashes and were well tolerated. Two antihypertensive agents, clonidine and methyldopa, have shown modest efficacy but with a relatively high rate of adverse effects. For moderate to severe hot flashes, systemic estrogen therapy, either alone (ET) or combined with progestogen (EPT) or in the form of estrogen-progestin oral contraceptives, has been shown to significantly reduce hot flash frequency and severity. Clinical trials have associated ET/EPT with adverse effects, including breast cancer, stroke, and thromboembolism. Several progestogens (both oral and intramuscular formulations) have shown efficacy in treating hot flashes, including women with a history of breast cancer, although no definitive data are available on long-term safety in these women.

CONCLUSIONS

In women who need relief for mild vasomotor symptoms, NAMS recommends first considering lifestyle changes, either alone or combined with a nonprescription remedy, such as dietary isoflavones, black cohosh, or vitamin E. Prescription systemic estrogen-containing products remain the therapeutic standard for moderate to severe menopause-related hot flashes. Recommended options for women with concerns or contraindications relating to estrogen-containing treatments include prescription progestogens, venlafaxine, paroxetine, fluoxetine, or gabapentin. Clinicians are advised to enlist women's participation in decision making when weighing the benefits, harms, and scientific uncertainties of therapeutic options. Regardless of the management strategy adopted, treatment should be periodically reassessed as menopause-related vasomotor symptoms will abate over time without any intervention in most women.

The association between depot medroxyprogesterone acetate contraception and bone mineral density in adolescent women

Although adolescent women are actively acquiring bone, there has been little study of the possible effects of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) injectable contraception use on bone density in adolescents. We conducted a cross-sectional evaluation of the association between DMPA use and bone mineral density in adolescent women, ages 14-18 years. Of 174 study participants, 81 were DMPA users (range, 1-13 injections, median = 3) and 93 were not. Mean bone density at all anatomic sites (hip, spine and whole body) was lower for DMPA users than nonusers, but differences were not statistically significant (e.g., hip, 0.940 vs. 0.970 g/cm2, p = 0.10; spine, 0.970 vs. 0.992 g/cm2, p = 0.19). Duration of DMPA use showed a trend toward lower spine bone density (p-value for trend = 0.06). This study did not find a strong association between DMPA use and bone density. Further prospective evaluation of bone density changes with DMPA use and after DMPA discontinuation are needed in this age group.

Bone mineral density in adolescent females using depot medroxyprogesterone acetate

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To examine bone mineral density (BMD) on a semi-annual basis among control subjects and adolescent females receiving depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) injection or oral contraceptives.

DESIGN

Non-randomized prospective study.

SETTING

Teenage pregnancy prevention intervention clinic.

PARTICIPANTS

Adolescent females who were new users of DMPA injection (N=58, age 12-21) or the oral contraceptive pill (N=71, age 11-19) and normal menstruating girls (N=19, age 15-18).

INTERVENTIONS

Baseline and 6-monthly measures of lumbar vertebral BMD using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry over a 2-year period.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

comparison of percent change on BMD over time between DMPA users, pill users, and normal menstruating girls.

RESULTS

There was no difference on group characteristics at baseline except for the ethnicity between the controls and the DMPA group. There was a statistically significant decrease in BMD between DMPA users and controls at 6 months (-3.02% change, P=0.014) 12 months (-3.38% change, P=0.001) 18 months (-4.81% change, P<0.001) and 24 months (-6.81% change, P=0.010). There was no statistical difference between pill users and controls.

CONCLUSION

There is a relationship between DMPA use and a decrease in BMD compared to normal menstruating controls that seems to persist up to 24 months.

Bone densitometry in premenopausal women: synthesis and review

Bone loss prior to menopause is being increasingly identified in women. Clearly, low bone mineral density (BMD) is a significant risk factor for fracture in the estrogen-deficient female postmenopause. The significance of low bone density prior to menopause needs to be addressed. Low bone density in the premenopausal female may reflect attainment of a lower peak bone mass. It may also be secondary to progressive bone loss following achievement of peak bone density. The etiology of low bone density in the premenopausal female needs to be clarified with meticulous exclusion of secondary causes of bone loss. Menstrual status is an important determinant of peak bone mass as well as the development of bone loss in women prior to the onset of menopause. Subclinical decreases in circulating gonadal steroids may be associated with a lower peak bone mass as well as progressive bone loss in otherwise reproductively normal women. Elevations of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) of greater than 20 miu/L are associated with evidence of increased bone turnover marker activity and correlate with progressive bone loss in perimenopausal women. This transitional period requires further study with respect to the magnitude of bone loss experienced and the potential benefits of antiresorptive therapy. Detailed assessment of menstrual status is necessary in the evaluation of low bone density in premenopausal women. The majority of the cross-sectional and longitudinal studies completed evaluating BMD in the premenopausal years suggest that minimal bone loss does occur prior to menopause after attainment of peak bone mass. The magnitude of premenopausal bone loss, however, is controversial and may be site-dependent. More rapid rates of bone loss are seen in the transitional period beginning 2-3 yr prior to the onset of menopause. Prospective data are needed to understand further the relationship between BMD and fracture in the premenopausal period. Women with steroid-induced bone loss as well as other secondary causes of osteoporosis respond to antiresorptive therapy with documented improvements in BMD. Biomarkers can identify perimenopausal women with increased bone turnover. Lifestyle modification can improve BMD in the pre- and the perimenopausal period. Antiresorptive therapy has not been evaluated in pre- or perimenopausal women with low BMD in the absence of secondary causes of osteoporosis. As new treatment options are evaluated and become available, biomarker assessment may be of value in identifying women at risk of fracture.

Controversies in adolescent hormonal contraception

Unintended pregnancy and abortion rates among US adolescents remain high although hormonal contraception is safe and effective in this population. Controversies affecting the provision of hormonal contraception for adolescents include the side effects of oral contraceptives, the possibility that progestin-only injectables lead to decreased bone health, and debate as to whether emergency contraception should be available to teens without a prescription. Each of these issues is addressed with a review of relevant literature.

A 2-year prospective study on the effects of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate on bone mass-response to estrogen and calcium therapy in individual users

The primary aim of this prospective 2-year follow-up study was to investigate the effect of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) on the maintenance of bone mass in women aged 30-45 years. The effects of estrogen or calcium substitution during the second year of follow-up was investigated in seven DMPA users with a high annual bone loss during the first year. The bone mass of 35 users of DMPA and 10 women without hormonal contraception was investigated using peripheral quantitative computed tomography. The baseline cortical and trabecular bone mass (TBM) and the annual change was not different in DMPA users and controls. Over 24 months we measured an increase in TBM of 0.6% and a decrease in cortical bone mass of 0.1% in exposed women. Some but not all of the DMPA users with a bone loss during the first year could be successfully treated with estradiol or calcium. In conclusion, we did not observe an accelerated bone loss in DMPA users aged 30-45 years.

A randomized controlled trial of estrogen replacement therapy in long-term users of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate

Long-term use of the injectable contraceptive depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA, Depo-Provera) is associated with a reduction in bone mineral density (BMD), particularly in the lumbar spine. The cause of DMPA-associated bone loss is not known, but the relative estrogen deficiency induced by DMPA use could be responsible. We have undertaken a randomized, double-blind controlled trial of oral estrogen replacement therapy in 38 premenopausal women (mean age 37) with a minimum 2 yr DMPA use who had a below average baseline lumbar spine BMD (T score < or = 0). Nineteen women were allocated to receive conjugated estrogens (0.625 mg/d orally) and 19 to receive a matching placebo. All continued with regular DMPA injections throughout the study. Areal bone density was measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry at the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total body sites every 6 months for 2 yr; the main outcome measure being the change in areal BMD at the lumbar spine. At baseline, the two groups were well matched for demographic, anthropometric, and biochemical variables, and for BMD. Twenty-seven subjects completed at least 18 months in the study, and 26 the full 2 yr, with similar numbers dropping out from each group (mainly for personal reasons). In the estrogen-treated group, mean lumbar spine BMD increased 1%, whereas in the placebo group it fell 2.6%, over 2 yr. The between group differences were 2.0% at 12 months (P = 0.058), 3.2% at 18 months (P < 0.01), and 3.5% at 24 months (P < 0.002). Differences of lesser statistical magnitude were seen at the femoral neck (between group differences at 2 yr: 2.7%, P = 0.24), Ward's triangle (5.0%, P = 0.055), greater trochanter (3.6%, P = 0.056), total body (1.3%, P = 0.046), legs (1.3%, P = 0.065), and trunk (2.0%, P = 0.029). There were no major adverse events. These data support the view that the likely cause of DMPA-associated bone loss is estrogen deficiency and demonstrate that it can be arrested by estrogen replacement therapy.

Injectable hormone contraception and bone density: results from a prospective study

BACKGROUND

Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) injectable contraception may decrease bone density and increase the risk for osteoporosis in later life. Prospective data are scarce, especially of the effects of DMPA discontinuation on bone.

METHODS

Between 1994 and 1999, we conducted a population-based prospective cohort study among women enrollees of a Washington State health maintenance organization. We enrolled 457 nonpregnant women, ages 18-39 years (183 DMPA users and 274 non-users). Bone density was measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry every 6 months for 3 years.

RESULTS

Bone density decreased notably among DMPA-exposed women at the spine (adjusted mean bone density was -0.0053 gm/cm for DMPA users compared with +0.0023 gm/cm for non-users for each 6-month interval) and total hip (-0.0060 compared with -0.0002 gm/cm ). This represents an annualized mean rate of change at the spine of -0.87% compared with +0.40% and, at the hip, -1.12% compared with -0.05%. Discontinuers of this method (N = 110) showed sizable increases in bone density over comparison women (for each 6-month interval, adjusted mean spine bone density was +0.0067 gm/cm compared with +0.0023 gm/cm, respectively; adjusted mean hip bone density was +0.0035 compared with -0.0002 gm/cm ). Estimated annualized mean rates of change were +1.41% compared with +0.40% [corrected] at the spine and +1.03% [corrected] compared with -0.05% at the hip. After 30 months, mean bone density for discontinuers was similar to that of non-users.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, DMPA use was strongly associated with bone density loss. Substantial postdiscontinuation recovery of bone provides evidence that the effects may be largely reversible.

Bone mineral density at various anatomic bone sites in women receiving combined oral contraceptives and depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate for contraception

The association between users of combined oral contraceptives and depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) for contraception and bone mineral density (BMD) has been controversial because of variations among studies. Like other studies, this cross-sectional study compares BMD in users of combined oral contraceptives and DMPA with that in nonusers. Unlike previous studies, we defined long-term use as >2 years, and we measured more bone sites than previous studies including lumbar spines, femurs, and forearms. The study group consisted of 59 women aged 30 years to 34 years who had been using combined oral contraceptives for 57.36 +/- 27.02 months with a minimum period of 24 months, 34 women of the same age who had been using DMPA as contraceptive for 55.76 +/- 35.31 months, and 62 women of the same age who had not used any steroid hormonal contraceptives for more than 6 months. BMD was measured by dual energy photon absorptiometer at lumbar spine 2-4, neck of femur, Ward's triangle of femur, greater trochanter of femur, ultradistal radius, and distal ulnar, respectively. Age, body mass index, and lifestyles of both groups were matched with nonusers. Mean BMD at lumbar spine (L2-4) in the DMPA users was significantly lower than in the controls (1.031 +/- 0.090 vs. 1.096 +/- 0.116, p = 0.007). There were no significant differences in BMD values at bone sites other than lumbar spine between DMPA users and the controls. There were no significant differences in BMD values at all bone sites between combined oral contraceptives users and the controls. We conclude that combined oral contraceptives are not associated with changes in values of BMD, while DMPA is associated with decreased BMD only at lumbar spine. We comment that steroid hormonal contraceptives are safe to use for long-term contraception regarding bone mass effects.

Menopausal bone loss in long-term users of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate contraception

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the rate of early postmenopausal bone loss in women who had used depot medroxyprogesterone acetate contraception through to menopause.

STUDY DESIGN

Bone mineral density at the lumbar spine and femoral neck was assessed prospectively over 3 years in 15 women who reached a natural menopause and who did not undergo hormone replacement therapy and in 16 long-term users of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate who discontinued depot medroxyprogesterone acetate only on reaching menopause. Of the latter, 5 women subsequently underwent hormone replacement therapy.

RESULTS

Early menopausal bone loss was rapid in the control group (6% from both sites over 3 years), but the users of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (who did not take hormone replacement therapy) showed little change in bone mineral density. Between-group differences were statistically significant at years 2 and 3 at both sites (P <.03-<.002). In the users of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate who underwent hormone replacement therapy, bone mineral density increased significantly (P <.03) at the lumbar spine and was stable at the femoral neck.

CONCLUSION

Women who use depot medroxyprogesterone acetate through to menopause have attenuated rates of bone loss from the lumbar spine and femoral neck, presumably because they have already lost the estrogen-sensitive component of bone.

Depot medroxyprogesterone and bone mineral density

OBJECTIVE

To investigate depot medroxyprogesterone (DMPA)-associated bone loss in a general practice setting.

DESIGN

Forty-eight patients from a single practice who had used DMPA for contraception for more than 2 years. All patients had a serum oestradiol and if the serum level was <52 pmol/l or >52 pmol/l with menopausal symptoms, bone mineral densitometry (BMD) measurements were made at the lumbar spine (LS) and femoral neck (FN) using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). Thirty-two patients had bone densitometry, of whom 27 had a serum oestradiol <52 pmol/l and five >52 pmol/l associated with menopausal symptoms. Of the remaining 16 patients, nine patients had a serum oestradiol <52 pmol/l but did not have a BMD as they moved away (five women) or switched to another contraceptive (four women).

RESULTS

BMD results showed a significantly reduced bone mass at both sites with mean Z score LS -0.84 (95% CI -1.17 to -0.52) and FN -0.32 (95% CI -0.62 to -0.02). Eighteen women (56% of 32 women) had either osteopenia (15 cases) (T score < -1.0) or osteoporosis (three cases) (T score < -2.5) at the LS. There were trends to an association of a family history of height loss or tobacco smoking (current or past) for LS and FN Z scores that did not quite achieve significance. There was also a trend to lower body weight in those with a possible family history of osteoporosis or who were smokers and an inverse correlation of weight with BMD at the FN (p < 0.05) and a non-significant inverse correlation at the LS.

CONCLUSION

The present results demonstrate that a low bone mass should be considered in patients with prolonged DMPA usage especially if they have risk factors for osteoporosis.

Overview of the relationship between use of progestogen-only contraceptives and bone mineral density

OBJECTIVES

To summarise the available epidemiological evidence regarding the relationship between the use of progestogen-only contraceptives and bone mineral density.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Overview of the published epidemiological literature.

RESULTS

Overall, 17 studies of the use of progestogen-only contraceptives and bone mineral density were identified, involving 1529 women exposed to progestogen-only contraceptives and 2086 controls. Sixty-eight percent of the data relate to the effects of use of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate. Average bone mineral density was reduced in current users of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate compared with non-users, although density in users was within one standard deviation of the mean in non-users. There was significant heterogeneity between the results of different studies (P < 0.0001). The reduction in bone mineral density appeared to be greater at the lumbar spine, femoral neck and ultradistal forearm than at the midshaft of the ulna. Studies involving women with a longer average duration of use of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate displayed greater reductions in bone mineral density compared with studies of women with shorter durations of use. Based on limited data, no difference in bone mineral density was observed between former and never users of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate. Results regarding the effect of levonorgestrel implants were conflicting. Studies of progestogen-only oral contraceptives and the progesterone vaginal ring were small and restricted to lactating women.

CONCLUSIONS

Women currently using depot medroxyprogesterone acetate have a lower average bone mineral density than non-users. The magnitude of this effect is uncertain but appears to be greater with longer durations of use.

Injectable contraception. New and existing options

DMPA and MPA/E2C contraception offer women safe, effective, convenient, and reversible birth control choices. The use of DMPA, a 3-month injectable, is characteristically associated with amenorrhea. Lactating women and women in whom contraceptive doses of estrogen are contraindicated can use this progestin-only birth control method. Return of fertility can be delayed in women discontinuing DMPA to become pregnant. In some cases, the use of DMPA also confers important noncontraceptive and therapeutic benefits. A monthly estrogen/progestin injectable contraceptive, MPA/E2C should appeal to women who are concerned about daily pill taking, who prefer regular cycles to amenorrhea, and who find monthly injections acceptable and accessible. As is true for oral contraceptives, MPA/E2C represents an appropriate choice for women who prefer a rapidly reversible contraceptive. Currently, the proposed contraindications for MPA/E2C parallel those for combined oral contraceptives. As MPA/E2C contraception becomes available for American women, clinicians will learn how to best include this new method among the array of contraceptive choices. By individualizing contraceptive selection, counseling, and management approaches based on the relevant behavioral and medical considerations reviewed herein, clinicians can maximize their patients' success with injectable contraceptives. The more innovative that clinicians, family planning agencies, and insurers are in facilitating access to care (including reinjections), the more women will be able to avail themselves of safe, effective, and reversible methods of contraception. In addition to the physician's office or health clinic, other sites at which women might receive contraceptive injections include employee health clinics, college health clinics, or perhaps the pharmacy where the prescription is filled. Self-administration may become an appropriate option for some users of injectable contraception.

Adolescents: at increased risk for osteoporosis?

Perhaps the most important factor in the primary prevention of osteoporosis is the attainment of an optimal peak bone during adolescence. In addition to endogenous factors, such as genetic and ethnic background, environmental factors such as dietary habits, physical activity, and sex hormone therapy, influence the accretion of bone mass during this critical period of skeletal growth. First, calcium dietary intake in adolescents is generally well less than the current recommended RDA of 1200 mg/day. Multiple studies of children and adolescents have demonstrated increases in bone mass with dietary calcium supplementation. Second, regarding physical activity, the overall impression is that a moderate amount of particularly weight-bearing exercise has a positive impact on bone. There appears, however, to be a threshold of intensity of physical activity over which a negative impact on bone occurs, particularly when the exercise is of an anaerobic nature or occurring in very thin, amenorrheic participants. Third, previous research suggests that the various forms of hormonal contraception exert differing effects on bone mass in adolescents, with levonorgestrel implants and combined oral contraceptives may be associated with a more positive effect on bone mass compared with that observed with depot medroxyprogesterone acetate. From a clinical perspective, approaches to optimizing peak bone mass in adolescents would include increasing calcium intake, whether in the form of dairy products, fortified foods, or supplements as well as encouraging participation at a moderate level, in weight-bearing exercise. Last, in adolescents with extensive risk factors and predicted long duration of use, subdermal implants or combined oral contraceptives may be the optimal hormonal methods of birth control.

Further evaluation on long-term depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate use and bone mineral density: a longitudinal cohort study

Cross-sectional studies on the effects of depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) on bone mineral density (BMD) have been controversial. The present longitudinal cohort study on 59 Chinese women over a period of 3 years has shown that their annual rate of bone loss at 3 sites (0.44% in lumbar spine, 0.40% in neck of femur, 1.05% in Ward's triangle) was substantially less than the projected values (1.1% in lumbar spine, 2.3% in neck of femur, 3.5% in Ward's triangle) in a cross-sectional study that had demonstrated a significant reduction in BMD in DMPA users than the non-user population. The trochanter BMD measurement did not show the projected annual bone loss of 2.4%. The rate of bone loss is probably non-linear, with a rapid loss in the first 5 years and a leveling off afterwards. The duration of DMPA use was not significantly correlated with the rate of bone loss. Multiple linear regression analysis demonstrated that age and body mass index were significant variables in modeling the rate of bone loss in the lumbar spine and neck of femur, but not in the trochanter and Ward's triangle areas. The Z scores also suggested a retardation in bone loss with time and potentially due to the effect of progesterone in decreasing bone turnover that is similar to the situation in postmenopausal women. The present data provide another aspect of reassurance to the long-term use of DMPA.

A prospective study on the effects of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate on trabecular and cortical bone after attainment of peak bone mass

OBJECTIVE

To study the annual change of bone mass in women aged 30-45 years being treated with depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) in order to evaluate whether the bone mass depends on the duration of DMPA use or the oestradiol level.

DESIGN

Prospective longitudinal study over an interval of 12 months.

SETTING

A family planning centre of a university hospital.

PATIENTS

Thirty-six current users of DMPA.

INTERVENTIONS

Injection of 150 mg DMPA every 12 weeks.

MEASUREMENTS

Bone mass was measured at the distal radius by peripheral quantitative computed tomography (reproducibility 0.3%).

RESULTS

Mean annual changes (SD) in trabecular and cortical bone mass were 0.06 (1.6%) [P = 0.8] and -0.26% (0.6) [P < 0.04]. The decrease in cortical bone mass was not significant because the changes were within the precision error of the method used for the measurements. Duration of DMPA use and oestradiol levels were not associated to the bone parameters.

CONCLUSION

We did not find a negative impact of DMPA on the bone mass of premenopausal women aged 30-45 years.

Effects of levonorgestrel-releasing subdermal contraceptive implants on bone density and bone metabolism

A prospective, randomized clinical trial observed the effects of Norplant long-term contraceptive implants and domestic implants similar to Norplant on bone mineral density and bone metabolism in female acceptors for 1 year. Bone mineral density (BMD) and bone mineral content (BMC) of lumbar 2-4 and proximal femur of 61 normal women of child-bearing age were measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) before and 12 months after implants insertion in both groups. BMD and BMC of lumbar 2-4 in both groups 12 months after implant insertion significantly increased (p < 0.01); with an average increase of 2.40% and 3.34%, respectively in the Norplant implant group, and 2.75% and 4.47%, respectively in the domestic implant group. Urine hydroxyproline and creatinine ratio (Hop/Cr) in the domestic implant group significantly decreased (p < 0.01). There was no significant differences in the effects on BMD and BMC of lumbar spine and femur and on bone metabolism between the two groups of contraceptive implants (p > 0.05). Levonorgestrel releasing contraceptive subdermal implants were not deleterious to the skeleton in women of child-bearing age. There was no significant effect on achieving maximum bone mass in young women.