Endothelin contributes to the hemodynamic effects of vasopressin in spontaneous hypertension

Vasopressin: mechanisms of action on the vasculature in health and in septic shock

BACKGROUND

Vasopressin is essential for cardiovascular homeostasis, acting via the kidney to regulate water resorption, on the vasculature to regulate smooth muscle tone, and as a central neurotransmitter, modulating brainstem autonomic function. Although it is released in response to stress or shock states, a relative deficiency of vasopressin has been found in prolonged vasodilatory shock, such as is seen in severe sepsis. In this circumstance, exogenous vasopressin has marked vasopressor effects, even at doses that would not affect blood pressure in healthy individuals. These two findings provide the rationale for the use of vasopressin in the treatment of septic shock. However, despite considerable research attention, the mechanisms for vasopressin deficiency and hypersensitivity in vasodilatory shock remain unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To summarize vasopressin's synthesis, physiologic roles, and regulation and then review the literature describing its vascular receptors and downstream signaling pathways. A discussion of potential mechanisms underlying vasopressin hypersensitivity in septic shock follows, with reference to relevant clinical, in vivo, and in vitro experimental evidence.

DATA SOURCE

Search of the PubMed database (keywords: vasopressin and receptors and/or sepsis or septic shock) for articles published in English before May 2006 and manual review of article bibliographies.

DATA SYNTHESIS AND CONCLUSIONS

The pathophysiologic mechanism underlying vasopressin hypersensitivity in septic shock is probably multifactorial. It is doubtful that this phenomenon is merely the consequence of replacing a deficiency. Changes in vascular receptors or their signaling and/or interactions between vasopressin, nitric oxide, and adenosine triphosphate-dependent potassium channels are likely to be relevant. Further translational research is required to improve our understanding and direct appropriate educated clinical use of vasopressin.

Critical Care Providers’ Perceptions of the Use of Vasopressin in Cardiac Arrest

• Background Although published algorithms and guidelines list epinephrine and vasopressin as either/or choices for treatment of ventricular fibrillation and/or pulseless ventricular tachycardia, little is known about how critical care providers respond to this recommendation.

• Objectives To assess the use of vasopressin as a first-line drug of choice for ventricular fibrillation and/or pulseless ventricular tachycardia and describe factors that may influence decision making for using vasopressin.

• Methods A convenience sample from 4 academic medical centers in the United States was recruited to complete a 20-item survey on demographic factors such as year of last Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) provider course, specialty certification, predominant practice responsibility, and beliefs related to the use of vasopressin for cardiac arrest. Descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation analysis, and logistic regression were used to analyze the data.

• Results A total of 214 critical care providers (80% registered nurses) completed the survey. Year of last ACLS course (r = −0.188, P = .006) was a significant demographic factor, and behavioral beliefs (attitude about using vasopressin) had the strongest relationship (r = 0.687, P < .001) and were the best predictor for intentions to use or recommend the use of vasopressin (beta=0.589, P<.001).

• Conclusions Despite the recommendation for vasopressin as an agent equivalent to epinephrine for treatment of ventricular fibrillation and/or pulseless ventricular tachycardia, 63% of respondents used epinephrine as a first-line drug of choice. More research is needed to address the classification system for interpreting the quality of evidence that may influence practice.

Endocrinologic response to vasopressin infusion in advanced vasodilatory shock

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the endocrinologic response to a combined arginine vasopressin and norepinephrine (AVP/NE) infusion in advanced vasodilatory shock, and to examine the relationship between baseline plasma AVP concentrations and the hemodynamic response to AVP.

DESIGN

Preliminary, prospective, randomized, controlled clinical study.

SETTING

Twenty-three-bed general and surgical intensive care unit.

PATIENTS

Thirty-eight patients with advanced vasodilatory shock. Hemodynamic and laboratory data of 34 patients have already been presented in a recently published prospective, randomized, controlled study.

INTERVENTIONS

Continuous AVP (4 units/hr) and NE infusion in study patients; NE infusion only in control patients.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

At baseline, 24 hrs, and 48 hrs after randomization, plasma concentrations of AVP, adrenocorticotropic hormone, cortisol, renin, angiotensin II, aldosterone, prolactin, endothelin I, and atrial natriuretic factor were determined. Hemodynamic variables were recorded at baseline and 1, 12, and 24 hrs after randomization. Linear mixed effects models were used to test for differences between groups. The relationship between AVP plasma concentrations and hemodynamic response to AVP was analyzed using linear regression analyses. AVP/NE patients exhibited significantly higher AVP (p <.001) and prolactin (p <.001) plasma concentrations during the study period; there were no significant differences in plasma concentrations of other hormones. No significant correlation was detected between plasma AVP concentrations and the increase in mean arterial pressure after 1 hr (Pearson's correlation coefficient =.134, p =.584) and after 24 hrs (Pearson's correlation coefficient = -.198, p =.417). There were further no correlations between AVP plasma concentrations and the 24-hr response to AVP therapy in heart rate (Pearson's correlation coefficient = -.065, p =.791), stroke volume index (Pearson's correlation coefficient = -.106, p =.687), and NE requirements (Pearson's correlation coefficient =.04, p =.869).

CONCLUSIONS

The preliminary results of this study indicate that a combined AVP and NE infusion increases prolactin plasma concentrations in advanced vasodilatory shock. Hemodynamic effects of AVP infusion are independent of baseline plasma AVP concentrations.

Management of vasodilatory shock: defining the role of arginine vasopressin

The rationale for an arginine vasopressin (argipressin) infusion was put forward after it was discovered that patients in shock states might have an endogenous arginine vasopressin deficiency. Subsequently, several investigations impressively demonstrated that arginine vasopressin can successfully stabilise haemodynamics even in advanced vasodilatory shock. We report on physiological and pharmacological aspects of arginine vasopressin, and summarise current clinical knowledge on employing a continuous arginine vasopressin infusion in critically ill patients with catecholamine-resistant vasodilatory shock of different aetiologies. In view of presented experimental evidence and current clinical experience, a continuous arginine vasopressin infusion of approximately 2 to approximately 6 IU/h can be considered as a supplemental strategy to vasopressor catecholamines in order to preserve cardiocirculatory homeostasis in patients with advanced vasodilatory shock. Because data on adverse effects are still limited, arginine vasopressin should be reserved for patients in whom adequate haemodynamic stabilisation cannot be achieved with conventional vasopressor therapy or who have obvious adverse effects of catecholamines that result in further significant haemodynamic deterioration. For the same reasons, arginine vasopressin should not be used as a single, alternative vasopressor agent instead of catecholamine vasopressors. Future prospective studies will be necessary to define the exact role of arginine vasopressin in the therapy of vasodilatory shock.

Endothelin antagonist reduces hemodynamic responses to vasopressin in DOCA-salt hypertension

The contribution of endothelin to the changes in blood pressure, cardiac output, and total peripheral resistance evoked by arginine vasopressin and angiotensin II was investigated in deoxycorticosterone acetate (DOCA)-salt hypertensive rats by infusing the peptides intravenously before and after pretreatment with the endothelin receptor antagonist bosentan. Blood pressure was recorded with radiotelemetry devices and cardiac output was recorded with ultrasonic transit time flow probes in conscious unrestrained animals. The dose-related decreases in cardiac output induced by vasopressin and angiotensin II were unaffected by bosentan. In contrast, the dose-related increases in total peripheral resistance evoked by vasopressin were blunted in both DOCA-salt hypertensive and sham normotensive rats, but this effect of bosentan was greater in the DOCA-salt hypertensive group. In contrast with vasopressin, bosentan failed to change hemodynamic responses to angiotensin II. The exaggerated vascular responsiveness (total peripheral resistance) of the DOCA-salt hypertensive group to vasopressin was largely abolished by bosentan. These results suggest that endothelin contributes to the hemodynamic effects of vasopressin but not angiotensin II in the DOCA-salt model of hypertension.

Vasopressin-mediated adrenocorticotropin release increases plasma cortisol concentrations during cardiopulmonary resuscitation

OBJECTIVE

Vasopressin is a possible stimulus for both adrenocorticotropin (ACTH) and endothelin-1 release. The aim of this study was to compare plasma concentrations of ACTH, cortisol, and endothelin-1 after epinephrine or vasopressin administration in an experimental animal model of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, controlled animal study.

SETTING

A university research laboratory.

SUBJECTS

Fourteen 12- to 14-wk-old domestic pigs.

INTERVENTIONS

After 4 mins of cardiac arrest and 3 mins of external chest compression, the pigs were randomly assigned to receive either 0.045 mg/kg epinephrine (n = 7) or 0.4 units/kg vasopressin (n = 7). At 5 mins after drug administration, defibrillation was attempted.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Coronary perfusion pressure, ACTH, cortisol, and endothelin-1 were measured before cardiocirculatory arrest, during CPR before drug administration, and at 90 secs and 5 mins after drug administration. Coronary perfusion pressure was comparable between groups. All seven animals in the vasopressin group survived, but only one pig in the epinephrine group survived (p = .005). ACTH and cortisol concentrations remained unchanged in epinephrine-treated animals, but increased significantly after vasopressin administration and were significantly higher than in epinephrine-treated animals 5 mins after drug administration. Endothelin-1 concentrations remained unchanged during the study period and were comparable between both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Vasopressin is a potent stimulus for ACTH secretion, but does not trigger endothelin-1 release from vascular cells during cardiac arrest and CPR. The increased plasma cortisol concentrations caused by the enhanced ACTH release after vasopressin may be one factor contributing to the improved outcome repeatedly observed with vasopressin in animal models of CPR.