Ca2+ dependence of the response of three adenosine type receptors in rat hepatocytes

Purinergic signalling in the liver in health and disease

Purinergic signalling is involved in both the physiology and pathophysiology of the liver. Hepatocytes, Kupffer cells, vascular endothelial cells and smooth muscle cells, stellate cells and cholangiocytes all express purinoceptor subtypes activated by adenosine, adenosine 5'-triphosphate, adenosine diphosphate, uridine 5'-triphosphate or UDP. Purinoceptors mediate bile secretion, glycogen and lipid metabolism and indirectly release of insulin. Mechanical stress results in release of ATP from hepatocytes and Kupffer cells and ATP is also released as a cotransmitter with noradrenaline from sympathetic nerves supplying the liver. Ecto-nucleotidases play important roles in the signalling process. Changes in purinergic signalling occur in vascular injury, inflammation, insulin resistance, hepatic fibrosis, cirrhosis, diabetes, hepatitis, liver regeneration following injury or transplantation and cancer. Purinergic therapeutic strategies for the treatment of these pathologies are being explored.

Intrahepatic adenosine-mediated activation of hepatorenal reflex is via A1 receptors in rats

Previous studies have shown that intrahepatic adenosine is involved in activation of the hepatorenal reflex that regulates renal sodium and water excretion. The present study aims to determine which subtype of adenosine receptors is implicated in the process. Mean arterial pressure, portal venous pressure and flow, and renal arterial flow were monitored in pentobarbital anesthetized rats. Urine was collected from the bladder. Intraportal administration of 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX), a selective adenosine A1 receptor antagonist, increased urine flow by 24%, 89%, and 143% at the dose of 0.01, 0.03, and 0.1 mg x kg(-1), respectively; in contrast, DPCPX, when administered intravenously at the same doses, only increased urine flow by 0%, 18%, and 36%. The increases in urine flow induced by intraportal administration of DPCPX were abolished in rats with liver denervation. Intrahepatic infusion of adenosine significantly decreased urine flow and this response was abolished by intraportal administration of DPCPX. Neither intraportal nor intravenous administration of 3,7-dimethyl-1-propargylxanthine, a selective adenosine A2 receptor antagonist, showed significant influence on urine flow. Systemic arterial pressure, renal blood flow and glomerular filtration rate were unaltered by the administration of any of the drugs. In conclusion, intrahepatic adenosine A1 receptors are responsible for the adenosine-mediated hepatorenal reflex that regulates renal water and sodium excretion.

The effect of antagonism of adenosine A1 receptor against ischemia and reperfusion injury of the liver

BACKGROUND

Adenosine is known to exert protective roles in hepatic ischemia and reperfusion injury, while all adenosine receptors do not play the cytoprotective roles. We have tested our hypothesis that blockage of adenosine binding to A(1) receptor by its antagonist, KW3902 [8-(noradamantan-3-yl)-1,3-dipropylxanthine] attenuates hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury.

METHODS

Adult female beagle dogs underwent a 2 h total hepatic vascular exclusion (THVE) with a venovenous bypass. Nontreated animals that underwent THVE with a venovenous bypass alone were used as the control (Group CT, n=6). KW3902 was given to the animals by continuous intraportal infusion for 60 min before ischemia at a dose of 1 microg/kg/min (Group KW, n=6). Two wk survival, hemodynamics, hepatic tissue blood flow (HTBF), liver function, energy metabolism, cAMP concentration, and histopathological findings were studied.

RESULTS

Two wk animal survival was significantly improved in group KW compared with that in group CT (group CT: 16.7% versus group KW: 83.3%). HTBF, liver function, and hepatic adenine nucleotide concentration were remarkably better in group KW than group CT. In addition, cAMP concentration in group KW was maintained significantly higher than group CT. Histopathological examination revealed preservation of hepatic architecture and suppression of neutrophil infiltration into hepatic tissue in group KW.

CONCLUSION

Administration of adenosine A(1) receptor antagonist before ischemia attenuates hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury. To elicit the beneficial effect of adenosine against ischemia and reperfusion injury of the liver, it is important to oppose adenosine A1 receptor activation.

Contribution of hepatic adenosine A1 receptors to renal dysfunction associated with acute liver injury in rats

Acute liver injury is associated with renal insufficiency, whose mechanism may be related to activation of the hepatorenal reflex. We previously showed that intrahepatic adenosine is involved in activation of the hepatorenal reflex to restrict urine production in both healthy rats and in rats with cirrhosis. The aim of the present study was to test the hypothesis that activation of intrahepatic adenosine receptors is involved in the pathogenesis of the renal insufficiency seen in acute liver injury. Acute liver injury was induced by intraperitoneal injection of thioacetamide (TAA, 500 mg/kg) in rats. The animals were instrumented 24 hours later to monitor systemic, hepatic, and renal circulation and urine production. Severe liver injury developed following TAA insult, which was associated with renal insufficiency, as demonstrated by decreased (approximately 25%) renal arterial blood flow, a lower (approximately 30%) glomerular filtration rate, and decreased urine production. Further, the increase in urine production following volume expansion challenge was inhibited. Intraportal, but not intravenous, administration of a nonselective adenosine receptor antagonist, 8-phenyltheophylline, improved urine production. To specify receptor subtype, the effects of 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX, an adenosine A(1) receptor antagonist) and 3,7-dimethyl-1-propargylxanthine (DMPX, an adenosine A(2) receptor antagonist) were compared. Intraportal but not intravenous administration of DPCPX greatly improved impaired renal function induced by acute liver injury, and this beneficial effect was blunted in rats with liver denervation. In contrast, neither intraportal nor intravenous administration of DMPX showed significant improvement in renal function. In conclusion, an activated hepatorenal reflex, triggered by intrahepatic adenosine A(1) receptors, contributed to the pathogenesis of the water and sodium retention associated with acute liver injury.

Inosine released after hypoxia activates hepatic glucose liberation through A3 adenosine receptors

Inosine, an endogenous nucleoside, has recently been shown to exert potent effects on the immune, neural, and cardiovascular systems. This work addresses modulation of intermediary metabolism by inosine through adenosine receptors (ARs) in isolated rat hepatocytes. We conducted an in silico search in the GenBank and complete genomic sequence databases for additional adenosine/inosine receptors and for a feasible physiological role of inosine in homeostasis. Inosine stimulated glycogenolysis (approximately 40%, EC50 4.2 x 10(-9) M), gluconeogenesis (approximately 40%, EC50 7.8 x 10(-9) M), and ureagenesis (approximately 130%, EC50 7.0 x 10(-8) M) compared with basal values; these effects were blunted by the selective A3 AR antagonist 9-chloro-2-(2-furanyl)-5-[(phenylacetyl)amino][1,2,4]-triazolo[1,5-c]quinazoline (MRS 1220) but not by selective A1, A2A, and A2B AR antagonists. In addition, MRS 1220 antagonized inosine-induced transient increase (40%) in cytosolic Ca2+ and enhanced (90%) glycogen phosphorylase activity. Inosine-induced Ca2+ mobilization was desensitized by adenosine; in a reciprocal manner, inosine desensitized adenosine action. Inosine decreased the cAMP pool in hepatocytes when A1, A2A, and A2B AR were blocked by a mixture of selective antagonists. Inosine-promoted metabolic changes were unrelated to cAMP decrease but were Ca2+ dependent because they were absent in hepatocytes incubated in EGTA- or BAPTA-AM-supplemented Ca2+-free medium. After in silico analysis, no additional cognate adenosine/inosine receptors were found in human, mouse, and rat. In both perfused rat liver and isolated hepatocytes, hypoxia/reoxygenation produced an increase in inosine, adenosine, and glucose release; these actions were quantitatively greater in perfused rat liver than in isolated cells. Moreover, all of these effects were impaired by the antagonist MRS 1220. On the basis of results obtained, known higher extracellular inosine levels under ischemic conditions, and inosine's higher sensitivity for stimulating hepatic gluconeogenesis, it is suggested that, after tissular ischemia, inosine contributes to the maintenance of homeostasis by releasing glucose from the liver through stimulation of A3 ARs.

In rat hepatocytes, different adenosine receptor subtypes use different secondary messengers to increase the rate of ureagenesis

In rat hepatocytes, the role of cAMP and Ca(2+) as secondary messengers in the ureagenic response to stimulation of specific adenosine receptor subtypes was explored. Analyzed receptor subtypes were: A(1), A(2A), A(2B) and A(3). Each receptor subtype was stimulated with a specific agonist while blocking all other receptor subtypes with a battery of specific antagonists. For the A(1) and A(3) adenosine receptor subtypes, the secondary messenger was the cytoplasmic Ca(2+) concentration ([Ca(2+)](cyt)). Accordingly, the A(1) or A(3)-mediated increase in [Ca(2+)](cyt) and in ureagenic activity were both inhibited by chelating Ca(2+) with either EGTA or BAPTA-AM. Also, Gd(3+) blocked both the increase in [Ca(2+)](cyt) and ureagenesis, suggesting that a Ca(2+) channel may be involved in the response to both A(1) and A(3). A partial effect was observed with the sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca(2+)-ATPase inhibitor thapsigargin. The concentration of cyclic AMP ([cAMP]) increased in response to stimulation of either the A(2A) or the A(2B) adenosine receptor subtypes, while it decreased slightly in response to stimulation of either A(1) or A(3). The stimulation of either the A(2A) or A(2B) adenosine receptor subtypes resulted in an increase in [cAMP] and an ureagenic response which were not sensitive to EGTA, BAPTA-AM, Gd(3+) or to thapsigargin. In addition, the adenylyl cyclase inhibitor MDL12,330A blocked the ureagenic response to A(2A) and A(2B), but not the response to either A(1) or A(3). Our results indicate that in the ureagenic liver response to adenosine, the secondary messenger for both, the A(1) and A(3) adenosine receptor subtypes is [Ca(2+)](cyt), while the message from the A(2A) and A(2B) adenosine receptor subtypes is relayed by [cAMP].

Regulation of glycogen metabolism in hepatocytes through adenosine receptors. Role of Ca2+ and cAMP

The objective of this work is to identify the adenosine receptor subtype and the triggered events involved in the regulation of hepatic glycogen metabolism. Glycogenolysis, gluconeogenesis, cAMP, and cytosolic Ca2+ ([Ca2+](cyt)) were measured in isolated hepatocytes challenged with adenosine A1, A2A, and A3 receptor-selective agonists. Stimulation of adenosine receptor subtypes with selective agonists in Ca2+ media produced a dose-dependent increase in [Ca2+]cyt with A1>A2=A3, cAMP with A2A, glycogenolysis with A1>A2A>A3, and gluconeogenesis with A2A>A1>A3, in addition, a decrease in cAMP was observed with A1=A3. Comparatively, in Ca2+-free media or with a cell membrane-permeant Ca2+ chelator, activation of these adenosine receptors with the same selective agonists produced a smaller and transient rise in [Ca2+]cyt with A1=A3>A2, no rise in glycogenolysis and gluconeogenesis with A3>A1, but a full rise with A2A. Thus, in isolated rat hepatocytes activation of the adenosine A1 receptor triggered Ca2+-mediated glycogenolysis, activation of the adenosine A2A receptor stimulated cAMP-mediated gluconeogenesis, and activation of the adenosine A3 receptor increased [Ca2+]cyt and decreased cAMP with minor changes in glycogen metabolism.