Topiramate potentiates the antiseizure activity of some anticonvulsants in DBA/2 mice

Cenobamate enhances the anticonvulsant effect of other antiseizure medications in the DBA/2 mouse model of reflex epilepsy

Clinical studies documented that cenobamate (CNB) has a marked efficacy compared to other antiseizure medications (ASMs) in reducing focal seizures. To date, different aspects of CNB need to be clarified, including its efficacy against generalized seizures. Similarly, the pattern of drug-drug interactions between CNB and other ASMs also compels further investigation. This study aimed to detect the role of CNB on generalized seizures using the DBA/2 mouse model. We have also studied the effects of an adjunctive CNB treatment on the antiseizure properties of some ASMs against reflex seizures. The effects of this adjunctive treatment on motor performance, body temperature, and brain levels of ASMs were also evaluated. CNB was able to antagonize seizures in DBA/2 mice. CNB, at 5 mg/kg, enhanced the antiseizure activity of ASMs, such as diazepam, clobazam, levetiracetam, perampanel, phenobarbital, topiramate, and valproate. No synergistic effects were observed when CNB was co-administered with some Na+ channel blockers. The increase in antiseizure activity was associated with a comparable intensification in motor impairment; however, the therapeutic index of combined treatment of ASMs with CNB was more favorable than the combination with vehicle except for carbamazepine, phenytoin, and oxcarbazepine. Since CNB did not significantly influence the brain levels of the ASMs studied, we suggest that pharmacokinetic interactions seem not probable. Overall, this study shows the ability of CNB to counteract generalized reflex seizures in mice. Moreover, our data documented an evident synergistic antiseizure effect for the combination of CNB with ASMs including phenobarbital, benzodiazepines, valproate, perampanel, topiramate, and levetiracetam.

Genetically epilepsy-prone rats (GEPRs) and DBA/2 mice: Two animal models of audiogenic reflex epilepsy for the evaluation of new generation AEDs

This review summarizes the current knowledge about DBA/2 mice and genetically epilepsy-prone rats (GEPRs) and discusses the contribution of such animal models on the investigation of possible new therapeutic targets and new anticonvulsant compounds for the treatment of epilepsy. Also, possible chemical or physical agents acting as proconvulsant agents are described. Abnormal activities of enzymes involved in catecholamine and serotonin synthesis and metabolism were reported in these models, and as a result of all these abnormalities, seizure susceptibility in both animals is greatly affected by pharmacological manipulations of the brain levels of monoamines and, prevalently, serotonin. In addition, both genetic epileptic models permit the evaluation of pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions among several drugs measuring plasma and/or brain level of each compound. Audiogenic models of epilepsy have been used not only for reflex epilepsy studies, but also as animal models of epileptogenesis. The seizure predisposition (epileptiform response to sound stimulation) and substantial characterization of behavioral, cellular, and molecular alterations in both acute and chronic (kindling) protocols potentiate the usefulness of these models in elucidating ictogenesis, epileptogenesis, and their mechanisms. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled "Genetic and Reflex Epilepsies, Audiogenic Seizures and Strains: From Experimental Models to the Clinic".

Fosinopril and zofenopril, two angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, potentiate the anticonvulsant activity of antiepileptic drugs against audiogenic seizures in DBA/2 mice

The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) exists in the brain and it may be involved in pathogenesis of neurological and psychiatric disorders including seizures. The aim of the present research was to evaluate the effects of some angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi; captopril, enalapril, fosinopril and zofenopril), commonly used as antihypertensive agents, in the DBA/2 mice animal model of generalized tonic-clonic seizures. Furthermore, the co-administration of these compounds with some antiepileptic drugs (AEDs; carbamazepine, diazepam, felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, phenobarbital, phenytoin, topiramate and valproate) was studied in order to identify possible positive interactions in the same model. All ACEi were able to decrease the severity of audiogenic seizures with the exception of enalapril up to the dose of 100mg/kg, the rank order of activity was as follows: fosinopril>zofenopril>captopril. The co-administration of ineffective doses of all ACE inhibitors with AEDs, generally increased the potency of the latter. Fosinopril was the most active in potentiating the activity of AEDs and the combination of ACEi with lamotrigine and valproate was the most favorable, whereas, the co-administrations with diazepam and phenobarbital seemed to be neutral. The increase in potency was generally associated with an enhancement of motor impairment, however, the therapeutic index of combined treatment of AEDs with ACEi was predominantly more favorable than control. ACEi administration did not influence plasma and brain concentrations of the AEDs studied excluding pharmacokinetic interactions and concluding that it is of pharmacodynamic nature. In conclusion, fosinopril, zofenopril, enalapril and captopril showed an additive anticonvulsant effect when co-administered with some AEDs, most notably carbamazepine, felbamate, lamotrigine, topiramate and valproate, implicating a possible therapeutic relevance of such drug combinations.

The selective nicotinic acetylcholine receptor alpha7 agonist JN403 is active in animal models of cognition, sensory gating, epilepsy and pain

Several lines of evidence suggest that the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor alpha7 (nAChR alpha7) is involved in central nervous system disorders like schizophrenia and Alzheimer's disease as well as in inflammatory disorders like sepsis and pancreatitis. The present article describes the in vivo effects of JN403, a compound recently characterized to be a potent and selective partial nAChR alpha7 agonist. JN403 rapidly penetrates into the brain after i.v. and after p.o. administration in mice and rats. In the social recognition test in mice JN403 facilitates learning/memory performance over a broad dose range. JN403 shows anxiolytic-like properties in the social exploration model in rats and the effects are retained after a 6h pre-treatment period and after subchronic administration. The effect on sensory inhibition was investigated in DBA/2 mice, a strain with reduced sensory inhibition under standard experimental conditions. Systemic administration of JN403 restores sensory gating in DBA/2 mice, both in anaesthetized and awake animals. Furthermore, JN403 shows anticonvulsant potential in the audiogenic seizure paradigm in DBA/2 mice. In the two models of permanent pain tested, JN403 produces a significant reversal of mechanical hyperalgesia. The onset was fast and the duration lasted for about 6h. Altogether, the present set of data suggests that nAChR alpha7 agonists, like JN403 may be beneficial for improving learning/memory performance, restoring sensory gating deficits, and alleviating pain, epileptic seizures and conditions of anxiety.

Spotlight on topiramate in epilepsy

Topiramate (Topamax) is a structurally novel broad-spectrum antiepileptic drug (AED) with established efficacy as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy in the treatment of adult and paediatric patients with generalized tonic-clonic seizures, partial seizures with or without generalized seizures, and seizures associated with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. The incidence and severity of many adverse events, including CNS-related events, may be reduced through the use of slow titration to effective and well tolerated dosages. It is associated with few clinically significant interactions with other drugs, is effective when used with other AEDs, is not associated with drug-induced weight gain and, at lower dosages, does not interfere with the effectiveness of oral contraceptives. Therefore, topiramate is a valuable option as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy in the treatment of epilepsy in adult and paediatric patients.

Topiramate: a review of its use in the treatment of epilepsy

Topiramate (Topamax) is a structurally novel broad-spectrum antiepileptic drug (AED) with established efficacy as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy in the treatment of adult and paediatric patients with generalised tonic-clonic seizures, partial seizures with or without generalised seizures, and seizures associated with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. The incidence and severity of many adverse events, including CNS-related events, may be reduced through the use of slow titration to effective and well tolerated dosages. It is associated with few clinically significant interactions with other drugs, is effective when used with other AEDs, is not associated with drug-induced weight gain and, at lower dosages, does not interfere with the effectiveness of oral contraceptives. Therefore, topiramate is a valuable option as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy in the treatment of epilepsy in adult and paediatric patients.

Influence of levetiracetam on the anticonvulsant efficacy of conventional antiepileptic drugs against audiogenic seizures in DBA/2 mice

Levetiracetam (LEV, [S]-alpha-ethyl-2-oxo-1-pyrrolidine acetamide) is a new antiepileptic that has been used as adjunctive therapy to treat patients with intractable epilepsy. Systemic administration of levetiracetam (2.5-30 mg/kg, intraperitoneally (i.p.)) was able to produce a dose-dependent decrease in DBA/2 audiogenic seizure severity score. In combination with conventional antiepileptic drugs, levetiracetam, 5mg/kg, i.p., which per se did not significantly affect the occurrence of audiogenic seizures in DBA/2 mice, potentiated the anticonvulsant activity of some antiepileptic drugs studied against sound-induced seizures in DBA/2 mice. The degree of potentiation induced by levetiracetam was greater, approximately twice, for carbamazepine, diazepam, felbamate, topiramate, gabapentin, and valproate, less for lamotrigine, phenobarbital and phenytoin. This increase was associated with a comparable impairment in motor activity; however, the therapeutic index of combined treatment of antiepileptic drugs with levetiracetam was more favourable than the combination with saline with the exception of lamotrigine, phenytoin and phenobarbital. Since levetiracetam did not significantly influence the total and free plasma and the brain levels of antiepileptics studied. In addition, levetiracetam did not significantly affect the hypothermic effects of the anticonvulsants tested. In conclusion, levetiracetam showed an additive anticonvulsant effect when administered in combination with some classical anticonvulsants, most notably carbamazepine, diazepam, felbamate, gabapentin, topiramate and valproate, implicating a possible therapeutic relevance of such drug combinations.

Synergistic combinations of anticonvulsant agents: what is the evidence from animal experiments?

PURPOSE

Combination therapy is often used in the treatment of seizures refractory to monotherapy. At the same time, the pharmacodynamic mechanisms that determine the combined efficacy of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are unknown, and this prevents a rational use of these drug combinations. We critically evaluate the existing evidence for pharmacodynamic synergism between AEDs from preclinical studies in animal models of epilepsy to identify useful combinations of mechanisms and to determine whether study outcome depends on the various research methods that are in use.

METHODS

Published articles were included if the studies were placebo-controlled, in vivo, or ex vivo animal studies investigating marketed or experimental AEDs. The animal models that were used in these studies, the primary molecular targets of the tested drugs, and the methods of interpretation were recorded. The potential association of these factors with the study outcome (synergism: yes or no) was assessed through logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 107 studies were identified, in which 536 interaction experiments were conducted. In 54% of these experiments, the possibility of a pharmacokinetic interaction was not investigated. The majority of studies were conducted in the maximal electroshock model, and other established models were the pentylenetetrazole model, amygdala kindling, and the DBA/2 model. By far the most widely used method for interpretation of the results was evaluation of the effect of a threshold dose of one agent on the median effective dose (ED50) of another agent. Experiments relying on this method found synergism significantly more often compared with experiments relying on other methods (p<0.001). Furthermore, experiments including antagonists of the AMPA receptor were more likely to find synergism in comparison with all other experiments (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Intensive preclinical research into the effects of AED combinations has not led to an understanding of the pharmacodynamic properties of AED combinations. Specifically, the majority of the preclinical studies are not adequately designed to distinguish between additive, synergistic, and antagonistic interactions. Quantitative pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic studies of selectively acting AEDs in a battery of animal models are necessary for the development of truly synergistic drug combinations.

Topiramate reduces ethanol consumption by C57BL/6 mice

BACKGROUND

Previous reports indicate that topiramate (TPM) might be an effective treatment for alcohol dependence, perhaps due to a decrease alcohol's rewarding effects resulting from inhibition mesocorticolimbic dopamine (DA) release. Additional reports indicate that TPM antagonizes chronic changes induced by alcohol at the alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-propionic acid (AMPA) and kainate receptors. In the present study, a C57BL/6 (B6) murine model (n = 40) was used to evaluate the effect of TPM on the consumption of 12% alcohol over a 21-h period.

METHODS

TPM (0, 10, 30, 90 mg/kg) injected subcutaneously into B6 mice 60 min prior to access to a 12% ethanol solution (v/v) over 8 days produced dose-responsive reduction in consumption during the first 2-h period after injection.

RESULTS

Across the 8 days of treatment ethanol intake (g/kg) for SAL, T10, T30, and T90, respectively, was 1.34, 1.03, 0.72, and 0.67. This reduction appears to require systemically available TPM since it was not statistically supported when assessed over the entire 21-h period of ethanol availability. None of the TPM doses affected food consumption or body weight, and T90 dose did not reduce motor activity either by itself or in combination with ethanol.

CONCLUSIONS

Unlike previous experiments using the same B6 mouse model to assess naltrexone or tiagabine, there was no evidence that mice developed tolerance to the TPM-induced reductions in ethanol consumption. Thus, in the B6 mouse, TPM reduced ethanol intake at doses with no readily apparent adverse side effects, an effect consistent with recent clinical reports. Additional study will be directed toward characterizing TPM as a treatment for alcohol dependence.

Topiramate does not affect the acquisition or expression of ethanol conditioned place preference in DBA/2J or C57BL/6J mice

BACKGROUND

Topiramate, an anticonvulsant, has been reported to increase the number of abstinent days and decrease craving in alcohol-dependent individuals. However, the neurobiological basis for topiramate's effect is unknown. To assess topiramate's effect on ethanol's rewarding and conditioning rewarding effects, the present experiments examined the effects of topiramate on the acquisition and expression of ethanol-induced conditioned place preference (CPP) in DBA/2J and C57BL/6J mice.

METHODS

A biased apparatus and subject assignment were used. Mice received ethanol (2 g/kg) or saline paired with an initially nonpreferred floor (CS+) and saline paired with an initially preferred floor (CS-) for 5-minute conditioning trials. During the acquisition experiments, mice received a pretreatment of topiramate (0, 5, 10, 20, 50, or 100 mg/kg) 1 hour before the CS+ trials. On intervening CS- trials, mice received a pretreatment of saline. For the preference test, all mice received saline injections and were placed on a split floor for a 30-minute test. During the expression experiments, mice received no drug pretreatment on conditioning trials, but were pretreated with topiramate (0, 10, 50, or 100 mg/kg) 1 hour before the test session.

RESULTS

Ethanol-induced CPP was observed in both strains, but topiramate did not affect the acquisition or expression of ethanol-induced CPP in either strain. Despite its failure to alter CPP, topiramate produced dose-dependent locomotor activating effects in both strains. These effects were observed both in the presence and in the absence of ethanol.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate that topiramate has no effect on ethanol's rewarding or conditioned rewarding effects as indexed by the place conditioning procedure. Thus, these studies raise the possibility that topiramate's efficacy in the treatment of alcoholism results from its impact on brain areas other than those that mediate ethanol's rewarding or conditioned rewarding effects. One alternative possibility is that topiramate decreases withdrawal-induced negative affective states that normally contribute to relapse.

Effects of topiramate on ethanol and saccharin consumption and preferences in C57BL/6J mice

BACKGROUND

Topiramate has recently been found to be more effective than placebo as an adjunct treatment for alcohol dependence, but it has not yet been investigated in animal models of ethanol consumption. The current experiment examined the effects of topiramate on ethanol drinking in mice using a continuous access, two-bottle choice procedure.

METHOD

C57BL/6J male mice were offered a 10% v/v ethanol solution versus tap water over 4 consecutive days per week. Mice were assigned to topiramate (1-50 mg/kg) or saline groups and received injections before the beginning of the dark phase of the light cycle. Topiramate dose increased over 5 successive weeks (1, 5, 10, 25, and 50 mg/kg). Fluid intake was measured 2, 4, and 23 hr after injection. Body weight and food intake were measured at the time of injection. In a second phase, mice were offered saccharin solutions (0.2 and 2.5% w/v) versus tap water after topiramate (50 mg/kg) or saline injections.

RESULTS

Results revealed that high topiramate doses (25 and 50 mg/kg) increased water intake and decreased ethanol preference. Compared with saline controls, topiramate produced dose-dependent, bidirectional effects on ethanol dose, with 25 mg/kg of topiramate increasing ethanol dose at 4 and 23 hr after injection but 50 mg/kg topiramate decreasing ethanol dose at 2 hr after injection. During saccharin exposure, topiramate decreased saccharin preference (for 2.5% w/v saccharin solution) and marginally increased water intake but did not directly alter intake of the saccharin solutions. Topiramate had no effects on body weight or daily food intakes.

CONCLUSIONS

Topiramate reduced ethanol preference in C57BL/6J mice, but this effect was primarily attributable to elevated water intake. Topiramate also reduced saccharin preference, likely through marginally significant increases in water intake. Increases in water intake and bidirectional effects of topiramate on ethanol dose complicate conclusions with regard to the effects of topiramate on ethanol reward.

Preclinical profile of combinations of some second-generation antiepileptic drugs: an isobolographic analysis

PURPOSE

The need for an efficacious treatment of patients with intractable seizures is urgent and pressing, because approximately 30% of epilepsy patients worldwide are still inadequately medicated with current frontline antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). This study sought to determine the interactions among some newer AEDs [topiramate (TPM), felbamate (FBM), oxcarbazepine (OXC), and lamotrigine (LTG)] in the maximal electroshock-induced seizures (MES) and chimney test (motor performance) in mice, by using the isobolographic analysis.

METHODS

Evaluation of the anticonvulsant and acute adverse (neurotoxic) effects in mice produced by the AEDs in combinations at the fixed ratios of 1:3, 1:1, and 3:1 allowed the assessment of their preclinical profile and the determination of benefit indices (BIs) for all individual combinations.

RESULTS

Combinations of TPM+FBM at the fixed ratios of 1:3, 1:1, and 3:1 offered supraadditive (synergistic) interactions against electroconvulsions and subadditivity (antagonism) in terms of acute neurotoxic effects in the chimney test (BIs ranged between 1.90 and 2.59, the best combinations from a preclinical point of view). The examined combinations of TPM+OXC also were advantageous due to synergistic interactions in the MES, and additivity in terms of acute neurotoxic effects produced by the AEDs (BIs ranged between 1.35 and 1.71). In contrast, OXC+FBM exerted subadditive (antagonistic) interactions in the MES test and additive interactions in terms of acute motor impairment of animals (BIs ranged between 0.53 and 0.71). The worst combination was observed for OXC+LTG, at the fixed ratio of 1:1, displaying subadditivity (antagonism) against electroconvulsions and supraadditivity (synergy) with respect to neurotoxicity (BIs, 0.43). The remaining combinations of OXC+LTG tested (i.e., 1:3 and 3:1) exerted additivity in the MES test and supraadditivity in the chimney test (BIs 0.54 and 0.49, respectively). None of the studied AEDs affected the brain concentrations of other AEDs, so the existence of any pharmacokinetic interactions to be responsible for the observed effects is improbable.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the current preclinical data, the pharmacological profile of combinations of TPM+FBM and TPM+OXC evaluated with isobolography was beneficial and might be worth recommendation to further clinical practice. In contrast, utmost caution is required during the use of OXC+FBM or OXC+LTG in clinical practice, because of the high risk of neurotoxic adverse effect appearance.

Nifedipine affects the anticonvulsant activity of topiramate in various animal models of epilepsy

Topiramate (TPM), a new generation antiepileptic drug was investigated for its anticonvulsant effects in various models of genetically determined and chemically induced epilepsy in rodents. In addition, based on recent electrophysiological data suggesting that TPM may interact with L-type Ca(2+) channels, we evaluated the effects of a concomitant administration of L-type Ca(2+) channel modulators on TPM's antiepileptic properties. TPM, dose-dependently, protected against audiogenic seizures in DBA/2 mice. Concomitant treatment with TPM and a low dose of L-type Ca(2+) channel antagonists nifedipine or verapamil or with the L-type Ca(2+) channel agonist, S(-)-1,4-dihydro-2,6-dimethyl-5-nitro-4-[2-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-3-pyridinecarboxylic acid methyl ester (Bay k 8644) was able to increase the ED(50) for this drug. TPM also protected against seizures induced by alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-propionic acid (AMPA), 4-aminopyridine (4-AP) and pentylenetetrazole (PTZ), but this activity was not significantly modified by nifedipine. TPM, dose-dependently, reduced the number and duration of epileptic spike-wave discharges (SWDs) both in WAG/Rij rats and lethargic (lh/lh) mice, two genetic models of absence epilepsy. Nifedipine decreased TPM's activity in WAG/Rij rats but paradoxically enhanced it in lh/lh mice, whereas Bay k 8644 displayed opposite effects in both absence models. These results confirm TPM's broad spectrum of anticonvulsant activity and support the proposal that a modulation of neuronal L-type Ca(2+) channel activity plays an important role in its antiepileptic activity.

Influence of carbenoxolone on the anticonvulsant efficacy of conventional antiepileptic drugs against audiogenic seizures in DBA/2 mice

Carbenoxolone, the succinyl ester of glycyrrhetinic acid, is an inhibitor of 11beta-hydroxy steroid dehydrogenase and gap junctional intercellular communication. It is currently used in clinical treatment of ulcer diseases. Systemic administration of carbenoxolone (1-40 mg/kg, intraperitoneally (i.p.)) was able to produce a dose-dependent decrease in DBA/2 audiogenic seizure severity score. Glycyrrhizin, an analogue of carbenoxolone inactive at the gap-junction level, was unable to affect audiogenic seizures at doses up to 30 mg/kg. In combination with conventional antiepileptic drugs, carbenoxolone, 0.5 mg/kg, i.p., which per se did not significantly affect the occurrence of audiogenic seizures in DBA/2 mice, potentiated the anticonvulsant activity of carbamazepine, diazepam, felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, phenytoin, phenobarbital and valproate against sound-induced seizures in DBA/2 mice. This effect was not observed after the combination of glycyrrhizin (10 mg/kg, i.p.) with some conventional antiepileptic drugs. The degree of potentiation induced by carbenoxolone was greater for diazepam, felbamate, gabapentin, phenobarbital and valproate, less for lamotrigine, phenytoin and carbamazepine. This increase was associated with a comparable impairment in motor activity; however, the therapeutic index of combined treatment of antiepileptic drugs with carbenoxolone was more favourable than the combination with glycyrrhizin or saline. Since carbenoxolone did not significantly influence the total and free plasma levels of diazepam, felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, phenytoin, phenobarbital, valproate and carbamazepine, pharmacokinetic interactions are not likely. However, the possibility that carbenoxolone can modify the brain clearance of the anticonvulsant drugs studied may not be excluded. In addition, carbenoxolone did not significantly affect the hypothermic effects of the anticonvulsants tested. In conclusion, carbenoxolone showed an additive anticonvulsant effect when administered in combination with some classical anticonvulsants, most notably diazepam, felbamate, gabapentin, phenobarbital, and valproate, implicating a possible therapeutic relevance of such drug combinations.

Glutamate metabotropic receptors as targets for drug therapy in epilepsy

Metabotropic glutamate (mGlu) receptors have multiple actions on neuronal excitability through G-protein-linked modifications of enzymes and ion channels. They act presynaptically to modify glutamatergic and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-ergic transmission and can contribute to long-term changes in synaptic function. The recent identification of subtype-selective agonists and antagonists has permitted evaluation of mGlu receptors as potential targets in the treatment of epilepsy. Agonists acting on group I mGlu receptors (mGlu1 and mGlu5) are convulsant. Antagonists acting on mGlu1 or mGlu5 receptors are anticonvulsant against 3,5-dihydroxyphenylglycine (DHPG)-induced seizures and in mouse models of generalized motor seizures and absence seizures. The competitive, phenylglycine mGlu1/5 receptor antagonists generally require intracerebroventricular administration for potent anticonvulsant efficacy but noncompetitive antagonists, e.g., (3aS,6aS)-6a-naphthalen-2-ylmethyl-5-methyliden-hexahydrocyclopenta[c]furan-1-on (BAY36-7620), 2-methyl-6-(phenylethynyl)pyridine hydrochloride (MPEP), and 2-methyl-6-(2-phenylethenyl)pyridine (SIB-1893) block generalized seizures with systemic administration. Agonists acting on group II mGlu receptors (mGlu2, mGlu3) to reduce glutamate release are anticonvulsant, e.g., 2R,4R-aminopyrrolidine-2,4-dicarboxylate [(2R,4R)-APDC], (+)-2-aminobicyclo[3.1.0]hexane-2,6-dicarboxylic acid (LY354740), and (-)-2-oxa-4-aminobicyclo[3.1.0]hexane-4,6-dicarboxylate (LY379268). The classical agonists acting on group III mGlu receptors such as L-(+)-2-amino-4-phosphonobutyric acid, and L-serine-O-phosphate are acutely proconvulsant with some anticonvulsant activity. The more recently identified agonists (R,S)-4-phosphonophenylglycine [(R,S)-PPG] and (S)-3,4-dicarboxyphenylglycine [(S)-3,4-DCPG] and (1S,3R,4S)-1-aminocyclopentane-1,2,4-tricarboxylic acid [ACPT-1] are all anticonvulsant without proconvulsant effects. Studies in animal models of kindling reveal some efficacy of mGlu receptor ligands against fully kindled limbic seizures. In genetic mouse models, mGlu1/5 antagonists and mGlu2/3 agonists are effective against absence seizures. Thus, antagonists at group I mGlu receptors and agonists at groups II and III mGlu receptors are potential antiepileptic agents, but their clinical usefulness will depend on their acute and chronic side effects. Potential also exists for combining mGlu receptor ligands with other glutamatergic and non-glutamatergic agents to produce an enhanced anticonvulsant effect. This review also discusses what is known about mGlu receptor expression and function in rodent epilepsy models and human epileptic conditions.

Effect of topiramate on the anticonvulsant activity of conventional antiepileptic drugs in two models of experimental epilepsy

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the interaction of the novel antiepileptic drug (AED), topiramate (TPM), with conventional AEDs against amygdala-kindled seizures in rats and pentylenetetrazol-induced convulsions in mice.

METHODS

Experiments were performed on mice and fully kindled rats. In pentylenetetrazol test, the chemoconvulsant was used at its CD97 dose of 105 mg/kg, producing clonic seizures in 97% of mice. Adverse effects were evaluated with the chimney test and passive avoidance task. Plasma levels of AEDs were measured with immunofluorescence.

RESULTS

TPM at 20 mg/kg exerted a significant anticonvulsant effect as regards seizure and afterdischarge durations in amygdala-kindled seizures in rats, being ineffective at lower doses. Coadministration of TPM (10 mg/kg) with valproate (VPA; at a subtherapeutic dose of 50 mg/kg) resulted in essential reductions of seizure and afterdischarge durations. TPM (10 mg/kg) combined with carbamazepine (CBZ; at a subtherapeutic dose of 15 mg/kg) significantly increased afterdischarge threshold, simultaneously decreasing the remaining seizure parameters (duration or severity of seizures and afterdischarge duration). TPM (10 mg/kg) given with phenobarbital (PB; 15 mg/kg) markedly shortened seizure severity and seizure and afterdischarge durations. Combinations of TPM with diphenylhydantoin (PHT) were ineffective against kindled seizures in rats. TPM combined with VPA and PB did not alter their plasma levels, but its combination with CBZ resulted in an increased free plasma CBZ concentration. TPM (10 and 20 mg/kg) alone and its combinations with conventional AEDs affected neither motor coordination nor long-term memory, evaluated in the chimney and passive avoidance tests, respectively, in rats. In pentylenetetrazol-evoked convulsions in mice, TPM (175 and 200 mg/kg) showed anticonvulsant effects per se. Moreover, TPM (at its subtherapeutic dose of 150 mg/kg), significantly potentiated the anticonvulsant action of ethosuximide (ESM), but not that of VPA, PB, or clonazepam (CZP) against pentylenetetrazol-induced seizures. Either TPM alone (150 mg/kg) or its combination with ESM did not result in significant undesired effects.

CONCLUSIONS

The experimental data indicate that except for PHT, the combinations of TPM with conventional AEDs are beneficial against amygdala-kindled seizures in rats. In the pentylenetetrazol test, this novel AED potentiated only the protection offered by ESM.

Influence of some beta-adrenoceptor antagonists on the anticonvulsant potency of antiepileptic drugs against audiogenic seizures in DBA/2 mice

The two enantiomers of propranolol antagonize generalized tonic-clonic seizures in DBA/2 mice with the (-)-enantiomer being about 1.5 times more potent than the (+)-enantiomer. Metoprolol was less active and atenolol was unable to affect audiogenic seizures. In combination with conventional antiepileptic drugs, both propranolol enantiomers tested in doses not affecting the occurrence of audiogenic seizures increased the anticonvulsant activity of diazepam, phenobarbital, valproate and lamotrigine and tended to increase that of carbamazepine and phenytoin. The effect was more pronounced with the (-)-enantiomer. This increase was associated with an enhancement of motor impairment, however, the therapeutic index of combined treatment of the antiepileptic drugs with both propranolol enantiomers was more favourable than the combination with saline alone. Metoprolol was also able to decrease the ED(50) values of the antiepileptic drugs, whereas atenolol showed no effects. Since neither enantiomer of propranolol significantly influenced the total and free plasma levels of the antiepileptics, pharmacokinetic interactions are not likely. In addition, (+)- and (-)-propranolol did not significantly affect the hypothermic effects of the antiepileptics tested. In conclusion, both enantiomers of propranolol and metoprolol showed an additive anticonvulsant effect when co-administered with some conventional antiepileptic drugs, most notably diazepam, phenobarbital, lamotrigine and valproate, implicating a possible therapeutic relevance of such drug combinations.