Cyclin B1 transcription is enhanced by the p300 coactivator and regulated during the cell cycle by a CHR-dependent repression mechanism

A-MYB substitutes for B-MYB in activating cell cycle genes and in stimulating proliferation

A-MYB (MYBL1) is a transcription factor with a role in meiosis in spermatocytes. The related B-MYB protein is a key oncogene and a master regulator activating late cell cycle genes. To activate genes, B-MYB forms a complex with MuvB and is recruited indirectly to cell cycle genes homology region (CHR) promoter sites of target genes. Activation through the B-MYB-MuvB (MMB) complex is essential for successful mitosis. Here, we discover that A-MYB has a function in transcriptional regulation of the mitotic cell cycle and can substitute for B-MYB. Knockdown experiments in cells not related to spermatogenesis show that B-MYB loss alone merely delays cell cycle progression. Only dual knockdown of B-MYB and A-MYB causes G2/M cell cycle arrest, endoreduplication, and apoptosis. A-MYB can substitute for B-MYB in binding to MuvB. The resulting A-MYB-MuvB complex activates genes through CHR sites. We find that A-MYB activates the same target genes as B-MYB. Many of the corresponding proteins are central regulators of the cell division cycle. In summary, we demonstrate that A-MYB is an activator of the mitotic cell cycle by activating late cell cycle genes.

Characteristics of anticancer activity of CBP/p300 inhibitors - Features of their classes, intracellular targets and future perspectives of their application in cancer treatment

Due to the contribution of highly homologous acetyltransferases CBP and p300 to transcription elevation of oncogenes and other cancer promoting factors, these enzymes emerge as possible epigenetic targets of anticancer therapy. Extensive efforts in search for small molecule inhibitors led to development of compounds targeting histone acetyltransferase catalytic domain or chromatin-interacting bromodomain of CBP/p300, as well as dual BET and CBP/p300 inhibitors. The promising anticancer efficacy in in vitro and mice models led CCS1477 and NEO2734 to clinical trials. However, none of the described inhibitors is perfectly specific to CBP/p300 since they share similarity of a key functional domains with other enzymes, which are critically associated with cancer progression and their antagonists demonstrate remarkable clinical efficacy in cancer therapy. Therefore, we revise the possible and clinically relevant off-targets of CBP/p300 inhibitors that can be blocked simultaneously with CBP/p300 thereby improving the anticancer potential of CBP/p300 inhibitors and pharmacokinetic predicting data such as absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion (ADME) and toxicity.

Interactions of circadian clock genes with the hallmarks of cancer

The molecular machinery of the circadian clock regulates the expression of many genes and processes in the organism, allowing the adaptation of cellular activities to the daily light-dark cycles. Disruption of the circadian rhythm can lead to various pathologies, including cancer. Thus, disturbance of the normal circadian clock at both genetic and environmental levels has been described as an independent risk factor for cancer. In addition, researchers have proposed that circadian genes may have a tissue-dependent and/or context-dependent role in tumorigenesis and may function both as tumor suppressors and oncogenes. Finally, circadian clock core genes may trigger or at least be involved in different hallmarks of cancer. Hence, expanding the knowledge of the molecular basis of the circadian clock would be helpful to identify new prognostic markers of tumorigenesis and potential therapeutic targets.

Ampelopsin induces MDA-MB-231 cell cycle arrest through cyclin B1-mediated PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway in vitro and in vivo

Breast cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors in women and it is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in the world. Ampelopsin (AMP) is a purified component from the root of Ampelopsis grossedentata. It is reported that AMP could significantly inhibit the proliferation of breast cancer cells. However, the antitumor mechanism against breast cancer has not yet been fully elucidated. The purpose of this work was to study the role of AMP against breast cancer MDA-MB-231 cells and to further investigate the underlying mechanism. PI3K/AKT/mTOR plays a very important role in tumor cell growth and proliferation and we hypothesize that AMP may inhibit this pathway. In the present work, the results showed that AMP could significantly inhibit the growth of breast cancer MDA-MB-231 cells in vitro and in vivo. In addition, treatment with AMP decreased the levels of PI3K, AKT and mTOR, as well as cyclin B1 expression, followed by p53/p21 pathway activation to arrest the cell cycle at G2/M. Moreover, it demonstrated a positive association between cyclin B1 and PI3K/AKT/mTOR levels. Importantly, this pathway was found to be regulated by cyclin B1 in MDA-MB-231 cells treated with AMP. Also, it was observed that cyclin B1 overexpression attenuated cell apoptosis and weakened the inhibitory effects of AMP on cell proliferation. Together, AMP could inhibit breast cancer MDA-MB-231 cell proliferation in vitro and in vivo, due to cell cycle arrest at G2/M by inactivating PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway regulated by cyclin B1.

Impact of Global Transcriptional Silencing on Cell Cycle Regulation and Chromosome Segregation in Early Mammalian Embryos

The onset of an early development is, in mammals, characterized by profound changes of multiple aspects of cellular morphology and behavior. These are including, but not limited to, fertilization and the merging of parental genomes with a subsequent transition from the meiotic into the mitotic cycle, followed by global changes of chromatin epigenetic modifications, a gradual decrease in cell size and the initiation of gene expression from the newly formed embryonic genome. Some of these important, and sometimes also dramatic, changes are executed within the period during which the gene transcription is globally silenced or not progressed, and the regulation of most cellular activities, including those mentioned above, relies on controlled translation. It is known that the blastomeres within an early embryo are prone to chromosome segregation errors, which might, when affecting a significant proportion of a cell within the embryo, compromise its further development. In this review, we discuss how the absence of transcription affects the transition from the oocyte to the embryo and what impact global transcriptional silencing might have on the basic cell cycle and chromosome segregation controlling mechanisms.

Suppression of cell cycle progression by poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor PJ34 in neural stem/progenitor cells

Neural stem/progenitor cells (NSPCs) express higher levels of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1) than mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs). Inhibition of PARP induces the expression of several genes in the p53 signaling pathway, including p21, which is critical for cell cycle control at the G1/S phase, triggers apoptosis, and suppresses cell cycle progression in NSPCs. However, upon the up-regulation of p21, the cell cycle does not arrest at any specific phase. In the present study, the expression of genes specific to the G1/S and G2/M phases of the cell cycle were analyzed following treatment with PJ34 (N-[6-oxo-5,6-dihydro-phenanthridin-2-yl]-N,N-dimethylacetamide), an inhibitor of PARP. PJ34 treatment dramatically down-regulated cyclin B1 expression in NSPCs, but not in MEFs, which was confirmed by a promoter assay. Down-regulation of FoxM1 and B-MYB revealed that the down-regulation of cyclin B occurs at the transcriptional level. GADD45 was also specifically up-regulated in NSPCs. Taken together, the activation of p53 by PJ34 treatment in NSPCs induced changes in the expression of genes involved in the cell cycle. Fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis revealed that PJ34 treatment suppressed G2/M to G1 progression in NSPCs, but not in MEFs. These data indicate that PJ34 treatment inhibits cyclin expression at the mRNA level and suppresses cell cycle progression in NSPCs.

The positive circadian regulators CLOCK and BMAL1 control G2/M cell cycle transition through Cyclin B1

We previously identified a tight bidirectional phase coupling between the circadian clock and the cell cycle. To understand the role of the CLOCK/BMAL1 complex, representing the main positive regulator of the circadian oscillator, we knocked down Bmal1 or Clock in NIH3T33C mouse fibroblasts (carrying fluorescent reporters for clock and cell cycle phase) and analyzed timing of cell division in individual cells and cell populations. Inactivation of Bmal1 resulted in a loss of circadian rhythmicity and a lengthening of the cell cycle, originating from delayed G2/M transition. Subsequent molecular analysis revealed reduced levels of Cyclin B1, an important G2/M regulator, upon suppression of Bmal1 gene expression. In complete agreement with these experimental observations, simulation of Bmal1 knockdown in a computational model for coupled mammalian circadian clock and cell cycle oscillators (now incorporating Cyclin B1 induction by BMAL1) revealed a lengthening of the cell cycle. Similar data were obtained upon knockdown of Clock gene expression. In conclusion, the CLOCK/BMAL1 complex controls cell cycle progression at the level of G2/M transition through regulation of Cyclin B1 expression.

Systems biology approach reveals a link between mTORC1 and G2/M DNA damage checkpoint recovery

Checkpoint recovery, the process that checkpoint-arrested cells with normal DNA repair capacity resume cell cycle progression, is essential for genome stability. However, the signaling network of the process has not been clearly defined. Here, we combine functional proteomics, mathematical modeling, and molecular biology to identify mTORC1, the nutrient signaling integrator, as the determinant for G2/M checkpoint recovery. Inhibition of the mTORC1 pathway delays mitotic entry after DNA damage through KDM4B-mediated regulation of CCNB1 and PLK1 transcription. Cells with hyper-mTORC1 activity caused by TSC2 depletion exhibit accelerated G2/M checkpoint recovery. Those Tsc2-null cells are sensitive to WEE1 inhibition in vitro and in vivo by driving unscheduled mitotic entry and inducing mitotic catastrophe. These results reveal that mTORC1 functions as a mediator between nutrition availability sensing and cell fate determination after DNA damage, suggesting that checkpoint inhibitors may be used to treat mTORC1-hyperactivated tumors such as those associated with tuberous sclerosis complex.

Alkyl-imino sugars inhibit the pro-oncogenic ion channel function of human papillomavirus (HPV) E5

Despite the availability of prophylactic vaccines the burden of human papillomavirus (HPV) associated malignancy remains high and there is a need to develop additional therapeutic strategies to complement vaccination. We have previously shown that the poorly characterised E5 oncoprotein forms a virus-coded ion channel or viroporin that was sensitive to the amantadine derivative rimantadine. We now demonstrate that alkylated imino sugars, which have antiviral activity against a number of viruses, inhibit E5 channel activity in vitro. Using molecular modelling we predict that imino sugars intercalate between E5 protomers to prevent channel oligomerisation. We explored the ability of these viroporin inhibitors to block E5-mediated activation of mitogenic signalling in keratinocytes. Treatment with either rimantadine or imino sugars prevented ERK-MAPK phosphorylation and reduced cyclin B1 expression in cells expressing E5 from a number of high-risk HPV types. Moreover, viroporin inhibitors also reduced ERK-MAPK activation and cyclin B1 expression in differentiating primary human keratinocytes containing high-risk HPV18. These observations provide evidence of a key role for E5 viroporin function during the HPV life cycle. Viroporin inhibitors could be utilised for stratified treatment of HPV associated tumours prior to virus integration, or as true antiviral therapies to eliminate virus prior to malignant transformation.

•

Imino sugars inhibit the viroporin activity of the E5 oncoprotein.

•

Imino sugars likely interact at E5 protomer interfaces within a channel to prevent oligomerisation.

•

Imino sugars and adamantanes block mitogenic signalling mediated by E5 from a range of high-risk HPV types.

•

Viroporin inhibitors reduce mitogenic signalling in differentiating primary keratinocytes containing high-risk HPV18.

Discovery and biological evaluation of thiobarbituric derivatives as potent p300/CBP inhibitors

Histone acetyltransferases (HATs) relieve transcriptional repression by preferentially acetylation of ε-amino group of lysine residues on histones. Dysregulation of HATs is strongly correlated with etiology of several diseases especially cancer, thus highlighting the utmost significance of the development of small molecule inhibitors against this potential therapeutic target. In the present study, through virtual screening and iterative optimization, we identified DCH36_06 as a bona fide, potent p300/CBP inhibitor. DCH36_06 mediated p300/CBP inhibition leading to hypoacetylation on H3K18 in leukemic cells. The suppression of p300/CBP activity retarded cell proliferation in several leukemic cell lines. In addition, DCH36_06 arrested cell cycle at G1 phase and induced apoptosis via activation of capase3, caspase9 and PARP that elucidated the molecular mechanism of its anti-proliferation activity. In transcriptome analysis, DCH36_06 altered downstream gene expression and apoptotic pathways-related genes verified by real-time PCR. Importantly, DCH36_06 blocked the leukemic xenograft growth in mice supporting its potential for in vivo use that underlies the therapeutic potential for p300/CBP inhibitors in clinical translation. Taken together, our findings suggest that DCH36_06 may serve as a qualified chemical tool to decode the acetylome code and open up new opportunities for clinical intervention.

Identification of novel cyclin gene fusion transcripts in endometrioid ovarian carcinomas

Formation of fusion genes is pathogenetically crucial in many solid tumors. They are particularly characteristic of several mesenchymal tumors, but may also be found in epithelial neoplasms. Ovarian carcinomas, too, may harbor fusion genes but only few of these were found to be recurrent with a rate ranging from 0.5 to 5%. Because most attempts to find specific and recurrent fusion transcripts in ovarian carcinomas focused exclusively on high‐grade serous carcinomas, the situation in the other carcinoma subgroups remains largely uninvestigated as far as fusion genes are concerned. We performed transcriptome sequencing on a series of 34 samples from ovarian tumors that included borderline, clear cell, mucinous, endometrioid, low‐grade and high‐grade serous carcinomas in search of fusion genes typical of these subtypes. We found a total of 24 novel fusion transcripts. The PCMTDI‐CCNL2 fusion transcript, which involves a member of the cyclin family, was found recurrently involved but only in endometrioid carcinomas (4 of 18 tumors; 22%). We also found three additional fusion transcripts involving genes belonging to the cyclin family: ANXA5‐CCNA2 and PDE4D‐CCNB1 were detected in two endometrioid carcinomas, whereas CCNY‐NRG4 was identified in a clear cell carcinoma. The recurrent involvement of CCNL2 in four fusions and of three other genes of the cyclin family in three additional transcripts hints that deregulation of cyclin genes is important in the pathogenesis of ovarian carcinomas in general but of endometrioid carcinomas particularly.

What's new?

Chimeric genes formed by fusion of previously separate genes are associated with many malignant tumors, but rare in ovarian cancer. Here the authors performed transcriptome sequencing of different types of ovarian tumors and identify novel fusion genes, involving cyclin genes, the master regulators of the cell cycle. As most of these fusions were found in ovarian cancer of the endometroid type, which represent about 10% of all ovarian cancers, the data point to a novel role of cyclin deregulation in this specific cancer subtype.

Cell cycle arrest through indirect transcriptional repression by p53: I have a DREAM

Activation of the p53 tumor suppressor can lead to cell cycle arrest. The key mechanism of p53-mediated arrest is transcriptional downregulation of many cell cycle genes. In recent years it has become evident that p53-dependent repression is controlled by the p53–p21–DREAM–E2F/CHR pathway (p53–DREAM pathway). DREAM is a transcriptional repressor that binds to E2F or CHR promoter sites. Gene regulation and deregulation by DREAM shares many mechanistic characteristics with the retinoblastoma pRB tumor suppressor that acts through E2F elements. However, because of its binding to E2F and CHR elements, DREAM regulates a larger set of target genes leading to regulatory functions distinct from pRB/E2F. The p53–DREAM pathway controls more than 250 mostly cell cycle-associated genes. The functional spectrum of these pathway targets spans from the G₁ phase to the end of mitosis. Consequently, through downregulating the expression of gene products which are essential for progression through the cell cycle, the p53–DREAM pathway participates in the control of all checkpoints from DNA synthesis to cytokinesis including G₁/S, G₂/M and spindle assembly checkpoints. Therefore, defects in the p53–DREAM pathway contribute to a general loss of checkpoint control. Furthermore, deregulation of DREAM target genes promotes chromosomal instability and aneuploidy of cancer cells. Also, DREAM regulation is abrogated by the human papilloma virus HPV E7 protein linking the p53–DREAM pathway to carcinogenesis by HPV. Another feature of the pathway is that it downregulates many genes involved in DNA repair and telomere maintenance as well as Fanconi anemia. Importantly, when DREAM function is lost, CDK inhibitor drugs employed in cancer treatment such as Palbociclib, Abemaciclib and Ribociclib can compensate for defects in early steps in the pathway upstream from cyclin/CDK complexes. In summary, the p53–p21–DREAM–E2F/CHR pathway controls a plethora of cell cycle genes, can contribute to cell cycle arrest and is a target for cancer therapy.

Protoparvovirus Interactions with the Cellular DNA Damage Response

Protoparvoviruses are simple single-stranded DNA viruses that infect many animal species. The protoparvovirus minute virus of mice (MVM) infects murine and transformed human cells provoking a sustained DNA damage response (DDR). This DDR is dependent on signaling by the ATM kinase and leads to a prolonged pre-mitotic cell cycle block that features the inactivation of ATR-kinase mediated signaling, proteasome-targeted degradation of p21, and inhibition of cyclin B1 expression. This review explores how protoparvoviruses, and specifically MVM, co-opt the common mechanisms regulating the DDR and cell cycle progression in order to prepare the host nuclear environment for productive infection.

Cell cycle transcription control: DREAM/MuvB and RB-E2F complexes

The precise timing of cell cycle gene expression is critical for the control of cell proliferation; de-regulation of this timing promotes the formation of cancer and leads to defects during differentiation and development. Entry into and progression through S phase requires expression of genes coding for proteins that function in DNA replication. Expression of a distinct set of genes is essential to pass through mitosis and cytokinesis. Expression of these groups of cell cycle-dependent genes is regulated by the RB pocket protein family, the E2F transcription factor family, and MuvB complexes together with B-MYB and FOXM1. Distinct combinations of these transcription factors promote the transcription of the two major groups of cell cycle genes that are maximally expressed either in S phase (G1/S) or in mitosis (G2/M). In this review, we discuss recent work that has started to uncover the molecular mechanisms controlling the precisely timed expression of these genes at specific cell cycle phases, as well as the repression of the genes when a cell exits the cell cycle.

Minute Virus of Mice Inhibits Transcription of the Cyclin B1 Gene during Infection

Replication of minute virus of mice (MVM) induces a sustained cellular DNA damage response (DDR) which the virus then exploits to prepare the nuclear environment for effective parvovirus takeover. An essential aspect of the MVM-induced DDR is the establishment of a potent premitotic block, which we previously found to be independent of activated p21 and ATR/Chk1 signaling. This arrest, unlike others reported previously, depends upon a significant, specific depletion of cyclin B1 and its encoding RNA, which precludes cyclin B1/CDK1 complex function, thus preventing mitotic entry. We show here that while the stability of cyclin B1 RNA was not affected by MVM infection, the production of nascent cyclin B1 RNA was substantially diminished at late times postinfection. Ectopic expression of NS1 alone did not reduce cyclin B1 expression. MVM infection also reduced the levels of cyclin B1 protein, and RNA levels normally increased in response to DNA-damaging reagents. We demonstrated that at times of reduced cyclin B1 expression during infection, there was a significantly reduced occupancy of RNA polymerase II and the essential mitotic transcription factor FoxM1 on the cyclin B1 gene promoter. Additionally, while total FoxM1 levels remained constant, there was a significant decrease of the phosphorylated, likely active, forms of FoxM1. Targeting of a constitutively active FoxM1 construct or the activation domain of FoxM1 to the cyclin B1 gene promoter via clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-enzymatically inactive Cas9 in MVM-infected cells increased both cyclin B1 protein and RNA levels, implicating FoxM1 as a critical target for cyclin B1 inhibition during MVM infection.IMPORTANCE Replication of the parvovirus minute virus of mice (MVM) induces a sustained cellular DNA damage response (DDR) which the virus exploits to prepare the nuclear environment for effective takeover. An essential aspect of the MVM-induced DDR is establishment of a potent premitotic block. This block depends upon a significant, specific depletion of cyclin B1 and its encoding RNA that precludes cyclin B1/CDK1 complex functions necessary for mitotic entry. We show that reduced cyclin B1 expression is controlled primarily at the level of transcription initiation. Additionally, the essential mitotic transcription factor FoxM1 and RNA polymerase II were found to occupy the cyclin B1 gene promoter at reduced levels during infection. Recruiting a constitutively active FoxM1 construct or the activation domain of FoxM1 to the cyclin B1 gene promoter via CRISPR-catalytically inactive Cas9 (dCas9) in MVM-infected cells increased expression of both cyclin B1 protein and RNA, implicating FoxM1 as a critical target mediating MVM-induced cyclin B1 inhibition.

Single-cell, single-mRNA analysis of Ccnb1 promoter regulation

Promoter activation drives gene transcriptional output. Here we report generating site-specifically integrated single-copy promoter transgenes and measuring their expression to indicate promoter activities at single-mRNA level. mRNA counts, Pol II density and Pol II firing rates of the Ccnb1 promoter transgene resembled those of the native Ccnb1 gene both among asynchronous cells and during the cell cycle. We observed distinct activation states of the Ccnb1 promoter among G1 and G2/M cells, suggesting cell cycle-independent origin of cell-to-cell variation in Ccnb1 promoter activation. Expressing a dominant-negative mutant of NF-YA, a key transcriptional activator of the Ccnb1 promoter, increased its “OFF”/“ON” time ratios but did not alter Pol II firing rates during the “ON” period. Furthermore, comparing H3K4me2 and H3K79me2 levels at the Ccnb1 promoter transgene and the native Ccnb1 gene indicated that the enrichment of these two active histone marks did not predispose higher transcriptional activities. In summary, this experimental system enables bridging transcription imaging with molecular analysis to provide novel insights into eukaryotic transcriptional regulation.

The p53-p21-DREAM-CDE/CHR pathway regulates G2/M cell cycle genes

The tumor suppressor p53 functions predominantly as a transcription factor by activating and downregulating gene expression, leading to cell cycle arrest or apoptosis. p53 was shown to indirectly repress transcription of the CCNB2, KIF23 and PLK4 cell cycle genes through the recently discovered p53-p21-DREAM-CDE/CHR pathway. However, it remained unclear whether this pathway is commonly used. Here, we identify genes regulated by p53 through this pathway in a genome-wide computational approach. The bioinformatic analysis is based on genome-wide DREAM complex binding data, p53-depedent mRNA expression data and a genome-wide definition of phylogenetically conserved CHR promoter elements. We find 210 target genes that are expected to be regulated by the p53-p21-DREAM-CDE/CHR pathway. The target gene list was verified by detailed analysis of p53-dependent repression of the cell cycle genes B-MYB (MYBL2), BUB1, CCNA2, CCNB1, CHEK2, MELK, POLD1, RAD18 and RAD54L. Most of the 210 target genes are essential regulators of G₂ phase and mitosis. Thus, downregulation of these genes through the p53-p21-DREAM-CDE/CHR pathway appears to be a principal mechanism for G₂/M cell cycle arrest by p53.

Situational awareness: regulation of the myb transcription factor in differentiation, the cell cycle and oncogenesis

This review summarizes the mechanisms that control the activity of the c-Myb transcription factor in normal cells and tumors, and discusses how c-Myb plays a role in the regulation of the cell cycle. Oncogenic versions of c-Myb contribute to the development of leukemias and solid tumors such as adenoid cystic carcinoma, breast cancer and colon cancer. The activity and specificity of the c-Myb protein seems to be controlled through changes in protein-protein interactions, so understanding how it is regulated could lead to the development of novel therapeutic strategies.

The CHR site: definition and genome-wide identification of a cell cycle transcriptional element

The cell cycle genes homology region (CHR) has been identified as a DNA element with an important role in transcriptional regulation of late cell cycle genes. It has been shown that such genes are controlled by DREAM, MMB and FOXM1-MuvB and that these protein complexes can contact DNA via CHR sites. However, it has not been elucidated which sequence variations of the canonical CHR are functional and how frequent CHR-based regulation is utilized in mammalian genomes. Here, we define the spectrum of functional CHR elements. As the basis for a computational meta-analysis, we identify new CHR sequences and compile phylogenetic motif conservation as well as genome-wide protein-DNA binding and gene expression data. We identify CHR elements in most late cell cycle genes binding DREAM, MMB, or FOXM1-MuvB. In contrast, Myb- and forkhead-binding sites are underrepresented in both early and late cell cycle genes. Our findings support a general mechanism: sequential binding of DREAM, MMB and FOXM1-MuvB complexes to late cell cycle genes requires CHR elements. Taken together, we define the group of CHR-regulated genes in mammalian genomes and provide evidence that the CHR is the central promoter element in transcriptional regulation of late cell cycle genes by DREAM, MMB and FOXM1-MuvB.

Phosphorylation of p300 increases its protein degradation to enhance the lung cancer progression

p300 is a transcription cofactor for a number of nuclear proteins. Most studies of p300 have focused on the regulation of its function, which primarily includes its role as a transcription co-factor for a number of nuclear proteins. In this study, we found that p300 was highly phosphorylated and its level was decreased during mitosis and tumorigenesis. In vitro and in vivo experiments aimed showed that cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1) and ERK1/2 phosphorylated p300 on Ser1038 and Ser2039. Mutations of Ser1038 and Ser2039 increased p300 protein stability and levels. Inhibition of p300 degradation by blocking its phosphorylation decreased the proliferation and metastasis activity of lung cancer cells, indicating that p300 acts as a tumor suppressor in lung cancer tumorigenesis. Investigation of the molecular mechanism showed that blocking p300 phosphorylation disrupted chromatin condensation and the increased the acetylation of histone H3. Analysis of cell cycle progression in HA-p300-S2A-expressing cells by flow cytometry showed that the p300 mutants arrested the cells at S-phase or delayed the mitotic entry and exit. The expression of several important oncogenes, MMP-9, vimentin, β-catenin, N-cadherin and c-myc, was negatively regulated by p300. In conclusion, during lung tumorigenesis, a phosphorylation-mediated decrease in p300 level enhanced oncogene expression during interphase and decreased histone H3 acetylation during mitosis, which promoted lung cancer progression.

Role of cyclin B1 levels in DNA damage and DNA damage-induced senescence

The cyclin B1-Cdk1 complex is a key regulator of mitotic entry. A large number of proteins are phosphorylated by the cyclin B1-Cdk1 complex prior to mitotic entry. Regulation of the mitotic events is linked to the control of the activity of the cyclin B1-Cdk1 complex to make cells enter mitosis, arrest at G2-phase, or skip mitosis. The roles of cyclin B1 levels in DNA damage are described. The ATM/ATR pathway acts as a molecular switch for regulating cell fates, flipping between cell death via progress into mitosis and polyploidization via sustained G2 arrest upon DNA damage, where cyclin B1 degradation is important for inducing polyploidization. The decrease in cyclin B1 levels that is induced by DNA damage leads to polyploidization in DNA damage-induced senescence. A useful method for monitoring the expression level of cyclin B1 throughout cell cycle progression in living cells is also presented.

The forkhead transcription factor FOXM1 controls cell cycle-dependent gene expression through an atypical chromatin binding mechanism

There are nearly 50 forkhead (FOX) transcription factors encoded in the human genome and, due to sharing a common DNA binding domain, they are all thought to bind to similar DNA sequences. It is therefore unclear how these transcription factors are targeted to specific chromatin regions to elicit specific biological effects. Here, we used chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing (ChIP-seq) to investigate the genome-wide chromatin binding mechanisms used by the forkhead transcription factor FOXM1. In keeping with its previous association with cell cycle control, we demonstrate that FOXM1 binds and regulates a group of genes which are mainly involved in controlling late cell cycle events in the G(2) and M phases. However, rather than being recruited through canonical RYAAAYA forkhead binding motifs, FOXM1 binding is directed via CHR (cell cycle genes homology region) elements. FOXM1 binds these elements through protein-protein interactions with the MMB transcriptional activator complex. Thus, we have uncovered a novel and unexpected mode of chromatin binding of a FOX transcription factor that allows it to specifically control cell cycle-dependent gene expression.

Aloe emodin induces G2/M cell cycle arrest and apoptosis via activation of caspase-6 in human colon cancer cells

Aloe emodin (AE), a natural anthraquinone, is reported to have antiproliferative activity in various cancer cell lines. In this study, we analyzed the molecular mechanisms involved in the growth-inhibitory activity of this hydroxyanthraquinone in colon cancer cell, WiDr. In our observation AE inhibited cell proliferation by arresting the cell cycle at the G2/M phase and inhibiting cyclin B1. AE appreciably induced cell death specifically through the induction of apoptosis and by activating caspases 9/6. Apoptotic execution was found to be solely dependent on caspase-6 rather than caspase-3 or caspase-7. This is the first study indicating that the AE induces apoptosis specifically through the activation of caspase-6.

The CHR promoter element controls cell cycle-dependent gene transcription and binds the DREAM and MMB complexes

Cell cycle-dependent gene expression is often controlled on the transcriptional level. Genes like cyclin B, CDC2 and CDC25C are regulated by cell cycle-dependent element (CDE) and cell cycle genes homology region (CHR) promoter elements mainly through repression in G(0)/G(1). It had been suggested that E2F4 binding to CDE sites is central to transcriptional regulation. However, some promoters are only controlled by a CHR. We identify the DREAM complex binding to the CHR of mouse and human cyclin B2 promoters in G(0). Association of DREAM and cell cycle-dependent regulation is abrogated when the CHR is mutated. Although E2f4 is part of the complex, a CDE is not essential but can enhance binding of DREAM. We show that the CHR element is not only necessary for repression of gene transcription in G(0)/G(1), but also for activation in S, G(2) and M phases. In proliferating cells, the B-myb-containing MMB complex binds the CHR of both promoters independently of the CDE. Bioinformatic analyses identify many genes which contain conserved CHR elements in promoters binding the DREAM complex. With Ube2c as an example from that screen, we show that inverse CHR sites are functional promoter elements that can bind DREAM and MMB. Our findings indicate that the CHR is central to DREAM/MMB-dependent transcriptional control during the cell cycle.

High expression of p300 has an unfavorable impact on survival in resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

p300 is a transcriptional regulator that is involved in fundamental processes such as cell proliferation, cell differentiation, and tumor progression. However, its role and clinical significance in resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) has not been elucidated. The purpose of this study was to explore whether there was a correlation between the expression of p300 by immunohistochemistry and the clinical outcome of a group of patients with ESCC treated with surgical resection.

METHODS

Tissue microarray that included 240 surgically resected ESCC specimens and 56 cases of paracancerous tissues was successfully generated for immunohistochemical evaluation. The clinical and prognostic significance of p300 expression was analyzed statistically. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare the postoperative survival between groups.

RESULTS

The expression frequency and expression levels of p300 were significantly higher in ESCC specimens (62.5%, 150 of 240) than in normal esophageal mucosa (8.9%, 5 of 56; p<0.001). Increased p300 expression was associated with higher histologic grade (p=0.012), T category (p=0.032), and N category (p=0.013). Patients with low expression of p300 demonstrated higher overall survival compared with those with high expression of p300 (mean, 80.0 months versus 56.9 months; p<0.001). A similar result was observed for disease-free survival (mean, 78.3 months versus 53.1 months; p<0.001). Furthermore, p300 expression could stratify the patient survival (disease-free survival and overall survival) in stage II (p=0.002, 0.003, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that the level of p300 expression was an independent prognostic factor in ESCC (relative risk, 1.658; p=0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

High expression of p300 suggests poor prognosis for patients with resectable ESCC.

p53 activates the PANK1/miRNA-107 gene leading to downregulation of CDK6 and p130 cell cycle proteins

The tumor suppressor p53 is a central regulator of cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis by acting as a transcription factor to regulate numerous genes. We identified all human p53-regulated mRNAs by microarray analyses and searched for protein-coding genes which contain intronic miRNAs. Among others, this analysis yielded the panthothenate kinase 1 (PANK1) gene and its intronic miRNA-107. We showed that miRNA-107 and PANK1 are coregulated by p53 in different cell systems. The PANK1 protein, which catalyzes the rate-limiting step of coenzyme A biosynthesis, is also upregulated by p53. We observed that p53 directly activates PANK1 and miRNA-107 transcription through a binding site in the PANK1 promoter. Furthermore, p53 is recruited to the PANK1 promoter after DNA damage. In order to get more insight into miRNA-107 function we investigated its potential target genes. Cell-cycle regulators are significantly enriched among predicted miRNA-107 targets. We found miRNA-107-dependent regulation of two important regulators of G(1)/S progression, CDK6 and the RB-related 2 gene RBL2 (p130). CDK6 and p130 proteins are downregulated upon miRNA-107 expression. Our results uncover a novel miRNA-dependent signaling pathway which leads to downregulation of cell cycle proteins in the absence of transcriptional repression.

Expression of papillomavirus L1 proteins regulated by authentic gene codon usage is favoured in G2/M-like cells in differentiating keratinocytes

We investigated whether differentiation-dependent expression of papillomavirus (PV) L1 genes is influenced by the cell cycle state in keratinocytes (KCs) grown in vitro or in vivo. In primary keratinocytes, flow cytometry revealed a clear shift from predominantly G0/G1 to G2/M cells from day 1 to day 7, with a three-fold increase in G2/M-like cells in day 7 keratinocytes that showed approximately 50% of the cells expressed a terminal differentiation marker involucrin. The correlation between the levels of the L1 proteins expressed from authentic (Nat) L1 genes of HPV6b and BPV1 and the frequencies of the G2/M-like KCs was significantly positive, while in contrast, a significantly negative correlation in the levels of L1 proteins expressed from codon-modified (Mod) L1 genes of HPV6b and BPV1 with the frequencies of the G2/M-like KCs was observed. Experiments using cell cycle arrest reagents (all-trans retinoic acid (RA) and colchicine) confirmed that L1 proteins expressed from PV Nat L1 genes were facilitated in G2/M-like KCs upon differentiation. Using immunofluorescence microscopy, it appears that L1 proteins from PV Nat L1 genes were co-expressed with cyclin B1, while the L1 proteins expressed from PV Mod L1 genes were preferentially associated with cyclin D2 in KCs in vitro and in mouse skin. Our results demonstrate that (1) expression of the L1 proteins from Nat L1 genes of HPV6b and BPV1 that have strong codon usage bias with A or T at codon third position dependent on KC differentiation is favoured by the G2/M-like environment and (2) codon modifications can alter the cell differentiation-dependent and cell cycle-associated patterns of expression of the PV L1 proteins in KCs.

The central role of CDE/CHR promoter elements in the regulation of cell cycle-dependent gene transcription

The cell cycle-dependent element (CDE) and the cell cycle genes homology region (CHR) control the transcription of genes with maximum expression in G(2) phase and in mitosis. Promoters of these genes are repressed by proteins binding to CDE/CHR elements in G(0) and G(1) phases. Relief from repression begins in S phase and continues into G(2) phase and mitosis. Generally, CDE sites are located four nucleotides upstream of CHR elements in TATA-less promoters of genes such as Cdc25C, Cdc2 and cyclin A. However, expression of some other genes, such as human cyclin B1 and cyclin B2, has been shown to be controlled only by a CHR lacking a functional CDE. To date, it is not fully understood which proteins bind to and control CDE/CHR-containing promoters. Recently, components of the DREAM complex were shown to be involved in CDE/CHR-dependent transcriptional regulation. In addition, the expression of genes regulated by CDE/CHR elements is mostly achieved through CCAAT-boxes, which bind heterotrimeric NF-Y proteins as well as the histone acetyltransferase p300. Importantly, many CDE/CHR promoters are downregulated by the tumor suppressor p53. In this review, we define criteria for CDE/CHR-regulated promoters and propose to distinguish two classes of CDE/CHR-regulated genes. The regulation through transcription factors potentially binding to the CDE/CHR is discussed, and recently discovered links to central pathways regulated by E2F, the pRB family and p53 are highlighted.

Transcriptional activation of the tumor suppressor and differentiation gene S100A2 by a novel p63-binding site

S100A2 is generally found expressed in the epidermis and was recently shown to play a crucial role in the differentiation of keratinocytes. Also known as CaN19, S100A2 was identified as a potential tumor suppressor. Expression of S100A2 is upregulated by p53. The proteins p63 and p73 are related to p53 and are expressed as several splice variants with partially overlapping tasks but also functions different from p53. It had been shown that p63 proteins with mutations in their DNA-binding domain cause severe phenotypes in man as autosomal dominantly inherited disease including EEC, AEC, SHFM, LMS and ADULT syndromes. Here we show that S100A2 is a transcriptional target of p63/p73 family members, particularly the p63 splice variant TAp63γ. The regulation is mediated by a novel transcriptional element in the S100A2 promoter which is bound by TAp63γ but not by p53. Mutant p63 proteins derived from EEC and ADULT syndrome patients cannot activate S100A2 transcription whereas SHFM-related mutants still can stimulate the S100A2 promoter. Consistent with a function in tumor suppression S100A2 expression is stimulated upon DNA damage. After doxorubicin treatment p63γ proteins are recruited to the S100A2 promoter in vivo. This may indicate a function of the p63-dependent S100A2 regulation in tumor suppression.

Cell cycle-dependent transcription of cyclin B2 is influenced by DNA methylation but is independent of methylation in the CDE and CHR elements

DNA methylation is an important mechanism involved in embryogenesis and tumor development. Changing cytosines to 5-methylcytosines in CpG dinucleotides has been found to be responsible for the inactivation of tumor suppressor genes by repressing transcription. A central cell cycle regulator whose synthesis is controlled by transcription is cyclin B. In mammalian cells, cyclin B1 and B2 proteins are well characterized and often found to be overexpressed in cancer patients. Transcription from cyclin B1 and B2 promoters during the cell cycle is dependent upon a combination of two sites named 'cell cycle-dependent element' (CDE) and 'cell cycle genes homology region' (CHR), through repression in G(0) and G(1) followed by release in G(2)/M. Here we show that the cyclin B2 promoter contains a CpG island and that 5-aza-deoxycytidine treatment leads to deregulation of cell cycle-dependent mRNA expression from this gene via a loss of repression in G(0). Furthermore, deletion of the DNA methyltransferase genes DNMT1 and DNMT3b leads to an increase in transcription of cyclin B2. Additionally, DNA methylation in vitro prevents transcriptional activation of the cyclin B2 promoter in G(2)/M. Analysis in vivo of the cyclin B2 core promoter revealed that the CDE/CHR site is partially methylated. However, quantitative in vivo analysis of the CpG-methylation level of the CDE during cell division indicates that CpG methylation is independent of the cell cycle. We conclude that DNA methylation affects cell cycle-dependent transcription of cyclin B2 but that regulation through CDE/CHR is independent of cytosine methylation.

Androgen deprivation increases p300 expression in prostate cancer cells

Standard therapy for nonorgan confined prostate cancer aims to block the production or action of androgens. Although initially successful, antiandrogen therapy eventually fails and androgen depletion independent (ADI) disease emerges. Remarkably, ADI prostate cancers still rely on a functional androgen receptor (AR). Aberrant expression of coregulatory proteins required for the formation of productive AR transcriptional complexes is critical for ADI AR activation. Previously, we have shown that the transcriptional coactivator p300 is required for ADI activation of the AR and is up-regulated in prostate cancer, in which its expression is associated with cell proliferation and predicts aggressive tumor features. The mechanism responsible for the deregulated expression of p300, however, remains elusive. Here, we show that p300 expression in prostate cancer cells is subject to androgen regulation. In several prostate cancer model systems, addition of synthetic and natural androgens led to decreased expression of p300 in a time-dependent and dose-dependent manner. Experiments using AR antagonists or small interfering RNA targeting the AR revealed that down-regulation of p300 depends entirely on the presence of a functional AR. It is noteworthy that androgens down-regulated p300 protein expression while leaving messenger levels unaltered. Conversely, both short-term and long-term androgen deprivation resulted in marked up-regulation of p300 expression. The androgen deprivation-induced increase in p300 expression was not affected by the addition of cytokines or growth factors or by cotreatment with antiandrogens. Moreover, increased p300 expression upon androgen starvation is crucial for prostate cancer cell proliferation, as loss of p300 expression severely reduces expression of cyclins governing G(1)-S and G(2)-M cell cycle transition and decreases 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine incorporation.

NF-Y-dependent cyclin B2 expression in colorectal adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

Cyclin B2, a G(2)-M cyclin, is overexpressed in colorectal adenocarcinomas compared with the normal mucosa. This study examined the level of cyclin B2 overexpression according to the histologic findings and investigated the mechanism(s) and clinical implications of cyclin B2 overexpression in colorectal adenocarcinomas.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

The immunoreactivity of the polyclonal antibodies to cyclin B2 was determined in colorectal cancer cells. The transcriptional regulation of cyclin B2 by NF-Y was analyzed using an in vitro transfection assay and an in vivo chromatin immunoprecipitation assay. The proliferative activity of the colorectal cancer cells in relation to cyclin B2 overexpression was further examined.

RESULTS

The cytoplasmic distribution of cyclin B2 immunoreactivity was positive in 42 of 65 (64.6%) cases of colorectal adenocarcinoma, and the level was similar regardless of the histologic type. A dominant-negative form of NF-YA effectively inhibited the cyclin B2 promoter activity, and NF-Y was found to bind three conserved CCAAT boxes in the cyclin B2 promoter in colorectal adenocarcinoma cells. Tumor cells with a higher functional cyclin B2 activity grew faster than those with a lower activity. Furthermore, there was a correlation between the cells showing immunoreactivity to cyclin B2 and those containing the proliferating cell nuclear antigen, a G1-S cyclin, which is also downstream of NF-Y in colorectal adenocarcinoma cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Cyclin B2 seems to be a molecular marker of a colorectal adenocarcinoma and that its up-regulation and coordinate expression of the other cell cycle-related genes by NF-Y might contribute to tumor cell proliferation by accelerating cell cycle progression.

Gene expression of cyclin-dependent kinase subunit Cks2 is repressed by the tumor suppressor p53 but not by the related proteins p63 or p73

Cks2 proteins are essential components of cyclin/cyclin-dependent kinase complexes and contribute to cell cycle control. We identify Cks2 as a transcriptional target downregulated by the tumor suppressor p53. Cks2 expression was found to be repressed by p53 both at the mRNA and the protein levels. p53 downregulates transcription from the Cks2 promoter in a dose-dependent manner and in all cell types tested. This repression appears to be independent of p53 binding to the Cks2 promoter. In contrast to p53, neither p63 nor p73 proteins can repress Cks2 transcription. Thus p53, rather than its homologues p63 and p73, may contribute to control of the first metaphase/anaphase transition of mammalian meiosis by downregulation of Cks2 expression.

Cell-cycle-dependent oscillation of GATA2 expression in hematopoietic cells

In vitro manipulation of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) is a key issue in both transplantation therapy and regenerative medicine, and thus new methods are required to achieve HSC expansion with self-renewal. GATA2 is a transcription factor controlling pool size of HSCs. Of interest, continuous overexpression of GATA2 does not induce HSC proliferation. In this report, we demonstrate that GATA2 expression, in leukemic and normal hematopoietic cells, oscillates during the cell cycle, such that expression is high in S phase but low in G(1)/S and M phase. GATA2 binding to target Bcl-X gene also oscillates in accordance with GATA2 expression. Using a green fluorescent protein (GFP)-GATA2 fusion protein, we demonstrate cell-cycle-specific activity of proteasome-dependent degradation of GATA2. Immunoprecipitation/immunoblotting analysis demonstrated phosphorylation of GATA2 at cyclin-dependent kinase (Cdk)-consensus motifs, S/T(0)P(+1), and interaction of GATA2 with Cdk2/cyclin A2-, Cdk2/cyclin A2-, and Cdk4/cyclin D1-phosphorylated GATA2 in vitro. Mutants in phosphorylation motifs exhibited altered expression profiles of GFP-GATA2 domain fusion proteins. These results indicate that GATA2 phosphorylation by Cdk/cyclin systems is responsible for the cell-cycle-dependent regulation of GATA2 expression, and suggest the possibility that a cell-cycle-specific "on-off" response of GATA2 expression may control hematopoietic-cell proliferation and survival.

Nitric oxide down-regulates polo-like kinase 1 through a proximal promoter cell cycle gene homology region

Polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1) is an evolutionarily conserved serine/threonine kinase essential for cell mitosis. As a master cell cycle regulator, p21/Waf1 plays a critical role in cell cycle progression. Nitric oxide (NO.) has been shown to down-regulate PLK1 and up-regulate p21/Waf1 independent of cGMP. Here, the respective roles of p38 MAPK and p21/Waf1 in NO.-mediated PLK1 repression were investigated using differentiated U937 cells that lack soluble guanylate cyclase. NO. was shown to down-regulate both PLK1 mRNA and protein. Nuclear run-on assays and mRNA stability studies demonstrated that the effect of NO. on PLK1 expression was associated with decreased transcription without changes in transcript stability. SB202190, a p38 MAPK inhibitor, prevented transcriptional repression of PLK1 by NO.. Transfection with dominant-negative p38 MAPK mutant eliminated the NO. effect on both p21/Waf1 and PLK1 gene expression. Knockdown of p21/Waf1 with siRNA also substantially reduced the regulatory effect of NO. on PLK1. Reporter gene experiments showed that NO. decreased activity of the PLK1 proximal promoter, an effect that was blocked by p38 MAPK inhibitor. Deletion or mutation of the CDE/CHR promoter site, an element regulated by p21/Waf1, increased base-line promoter activity and abolished NO. repression of the PLK1 promoter. Likewise, electrophoretic mobility shift assays with CDE/CHR probe revealed a NO.-mediated change in protein-probe complex formation. Competition with various unlabeled CDE/CHR mutant sequences showed that NO. increased nuclear protein binding to intact CHR. These results demonstrate that a NO.-p38 MAPK-p21/Waf1 signal transduction pathway represses PLK1 through a canonical CDE/CHR promoter element.

p53 downregulates expression of the G1/S cell cycle phosphatase Cdc25A

Overexpression of Cdc25A phosphatase is often observed in cancer and results in poor prognosis. Cdc25A mainly dephosphorylates and thereby activates Cyclin-dependent kinase 2 and thus induces progression in the cell cycle from G(1) to S phase. Here, we demonstrate that the tumor suppressor p53 downregulates expression from the Cdc25A gene. In a p53-inducible cell system, Cdc25A expression on the mRNA and protein level is downregulated upon p53 expression. Promoter-reporter assays show that this regulation is dependent on the Cdc25A promoter. Mutant p53 fails to reduce Cdc25A transcription. In contrast to p53, neither p63 nor p73 can repress Cdc25A transcription. The Cdc25A promoter displays no p53 binding site, and p53 does not bind directly to the promoter DNA as shown by chromatin immunoprecipitation assays. Previously, the contribution of p53 to G(1)/S arrest has been mostly linked to activating the expression of the Cdk inhibitor p21(WAF1/CIP1). By downregulating Cdc25A expression, p53 may impair transition from G(1) to S phase independently of p21(WAF1/CIP1). Therefore, the data suggest that, as long as p53 is intact, Cdc25A transcriptional downregulation might play a role in cancer prevention.

Human cyclin B3. mRNA expression during the cell cycle and identification of three novel nonclassical nuclear localization signals

Cyclins form complexes with cyclin-dependent kinases. By controlling activity of the enzymes, cyclins regulate progression through the cell cycle. A- and B-type cyclins were discovered due to their distinct appearance in S and G(2) phases and their rapid proteolytic destruction during mitosis. Transition from G(2) to mitosis is basically controlled by B-type cyclins. In mammals, two cyclin B proteins are well characterized, cyclin B1 and cyclin B2. Recently, a human cyclin B3 gene was described. In contrast to the expression pattern of other B-type cyclins, we find cyclin B3 mRNA expressed not only in S and G(2)/M cells but also in G(0) and G(1). Human cyclin B3 is expressed in different variants. We show that one isoform remains in the cytoplasm, whereas the other variant is translocated to the nucleus. Transport to the nucleus is dependent on three autonomous nonclassical nuclear localization signals that where previously not implicated in nuclear translocation. It had been shown that cyclin B3 coimmunoprecipitates with cdk2; but this complex does not exhibit any kinase activity. Furthermore, a degradation-resistant version of cyclin B3 can arrest cells in G(1) and G(2). Taken together with the finding that cyclin B3 mRNA is not only expressed in G(2)/M but is also detected in significant amounts in resting cells and in G(1) cells. This may suggest a dominant-negative function of human cyclin B3 in competition with activating cyclins in G(0) and the G(1) phase of the cell cycle.

Cyclin G1 overcomes radiation-induced G2 arrest and increases cell death through transcriptional activation of cyclin B1

Although cyclin G1 has been implicated in certain p53-related biological phenomena, other aspects of its function remain unclear. Here we report hitherto unknown mechanism by which cyclin G1 increases radiation sensitivity by regulating the level of cyclin B1. Overexpression of cyclin G1 was observable in lung carcinoma tissues. Irradiation of human lung cells with cyclin G1 overexpression resulted in increased cell death and gamma-H2AX foci suggesting that cyclin G1 rendered the cells more susceptible to DNA damage. Enhanced radiosensitivity by cyclin G1 was correlated with increased cyclin B1, CDC2/cyclin B1 complex, and MPM2. Cell cycle synchronization clearly showed coexpression of cyclin G1 and cyclin B1 in G2/M phase. Depletion of cyclin G1 by interference RNA revealed that cyclin G1 regulated transcription of cyclin B1 in a p53-independent manner, and confirmed that the increased mitotic cells and cell death by cyclin G1 were dependent upon cyclin B1. Therefore, our data suggest that cyclin G1 enhanced radiation sensitivity by overriding radiation-induced G2 arrest through transcriptional upregulation of cyclin B1.

cGMP-independent nitric oxide signaling and regulation of the cell cycle

BACKGROUND

Regulatory functions of nitric oxide (NO*) that bypass the second messenger cGMP are incompletely understood. Here, cGMP-independent effects of NO* on gene expression were globally examined in U937 cells, a human monoblastoid line that constitutively lacks soluble guanylate cyclase. Differentiated U937 cells (>80% in G0/G1) were exposed to S-nitrosoglutathione, a NO* donor, or glutathione alone (control) for 6 h without or with dibutyryl-cAMP (Bt2cAMP), and then harvested to extract total RNA for microarray analysis. Bt2cAMP was used to block signaling attributable to NO*-induced decreases in cAMP.

RESULTS

NO* regulated 110 transcripts that annotated disproportionately to the cell cycle and cell proliferation (47/110, 43%) and more frequently than expected contained AU-rich, post-transcriptional regulatory elements (ARE). Bt2cAMP regulated 106 genes; cell cycle gene enrichment did not reach significance. Like NO*, Bt2cAMP was associated with ARE-containing transcripts. A comparison of NO* and Bt2cAMP effects showed that NO* regulation of cell cycle genes was independent of its ability to interfere with cAMP signaling. Cell cycle genes induced by NO* annotated to G1/S (7/8) and included E2F1 and p21/Waf1/Cip1; 6 of these 7 were E2F target genes involved in G1/S transition. Repressed genes were G2/M associated (24/27); 8 of 27 were known targets of p21. E2F1 mRNA and protein were increased by NO*, as was E2F1 binding to E2F promoter elements. NO* activated p38 MAPK, stabilizing p21 mRNA (an ARE-containing transcript) and increasing p21 protein; this increased protein binding to CDE/CHR promoter sites of p21 target genes, repressing key G2/M phase genes, and increasing the proportion of cells in G2/M.

CONCLUSION

NO* coordinates a highly integrated program of cell cycle arrest that regulates a large number of genes, but does not require signaling through cGMP. In humans, antiproliferative effects of NO* may rely substantially on cGMP-independent mechanisms. Stress kinase signaling and alterations in mRNA stability appear to be major pathways by which NO* regulates the transcriptome.

Global detection of molecular changes reveals concurrent alteration of several biological pathways in nonsmall cell lung cancer cells

To identify the molecular changes that occur in non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), we compared the gene expression profile of the NCI-H292 (H292) NSCLC cell line with that of normal human tracheobronchial epithelial (NHTBE) cells. The NHTBE cells were grown in a three-dimensional organotypic culture system that permits maintenance of the normal pseudostratified mucociliary phenotype characteristic of bronchial epithelium in vivo. Microarray analysis using the Affymetrix oligonucleotide chip U95Av2 revealed that 1,683 genes showed a >1.5-fold change in expression in the H292 cell line relative to the NHTBE cells. Specifically, 418 genes were downregulated and 1,265 were upregulated in the H292 cells. The expression data for selected genes were validated in several different NSCLC cell lines using quantitative real-time PCR and Western analysis. Further analysis of the differentially expressed genes indicated that WNT responses, apoptosis, cell cycle regulation and cell proliferation were significantly altered in the H292 cells. Functional analysis using fluorescence-activated cell sorting confirmed concurrent changes in the activity of these pathways in the H292 line. These findings show that (1) NSCLC cells display deregulation of the WNT, apoptosis, proliferation and cell cycle pathways, as has been found in many other types of cancer cells, and (2) that organotypically cultured NHTBE cells can be used as a reference to identify genes and pathways that are differentially expressed in tumor cells derived from bronchogenic epithelium.

Direct p53 transcriptional repression: in vivo analysis of CCAAT-containing G2/M promoters

In response to DNA damage, p53 activates G(1)/S blocking and apoptotic genes through sequence-specific binding. p53 also represses genes with no target site, such as those for Cdc2 and cyclin B, key regulators of the G(2)/M transition. Like most G(2)/M promoters, they rely on multiple CCAAT boxes activated by NF-Y, whose binding to DNA is temporally regulated during the cell cycle. NF-Y associates with p53 in vitro and in vivo through the alphaC helix of NF-YC (a subunit of NF-Y) and a region close to the tetramerization domain of p53. Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments indicated that p53 is associated with cyclin B2, CDC25C, and Cdc2 promoters in vivo before and after DNA damage, requiring DNA-bound NF-Y. Following DNA damage, p53 is rapidly acetylated at K320 and K373 to K382, histones are deacetylated, and the release of PCAF and p300 correlates with the recruitment of histone deacetylases (HDACs)-HDAC1 before HDAC4 and HDAC5-and promoter repression. HDAC recruitment requires intact NF-Y binding sites. In transfection assays, PCAF represses cyclin B2, and a nonacetylated p53 mutant shows a complete loss of repression potential, despite its abilities to bind NF-Y and to be recruited on G(2)/M promoters. These data (i) detail a strategy of direct p53 repression through associations with multiple NF-Y trimers that is independent of sequence-specific binding of p53 and that requires C-terminal acetylation, (ii) suggest that p53 is a DNA damage sentinel of the G(2)/M transition, and (iii) delineate a new role for PCAF in cell cycle control.

TAp63γ can substitute for p53 in inducing expression of themaspintumor suppressor

Maspin is a Class II tumor suppressor protein and plays a role in tumor growth by inhibiting cellular invasion and motility. It is a member of the serpin family of protease inhibitors and has been shown to reduce angiogenesis. Maspin gene expression can be upregulated by the tumor suppressor p53. We tested 7 p53-related proteins of the p63 and p73 families for their ability to induce maspin expression. The p63 splice form TAp63gamma can substitute for p53 in activating the maspin promoter. TAp63gamma activates the promoter through the same consensus site as p53. In the DLD-1 colorectal adenocarcinoma cell line, harboring a tet-off regulated transgene, induction of TAp63gamma leads to an upregulation of maspin mRNA from the chromosomal gene. With a short lag phase also maspin protein levels are elevated after induced TAp63gamma expression. To assess a potential function of p63-dependent maspin upregulation in tumors we followed expression of p53, p63 and maspin by immunohistochemistry in hepatocellular carcinomas. Two types of tumors with wild-type or mutant p53 were assayed. Interestingly, the majority of tumors expressing only a mutated and inactive p53 protein nonetheless stain positive for maspin, whereas these tumors were positive for p63 protein expression. In summary, we show that TAp63gamma can substitute for p53 in transcriptional activation of the maspin tumor suppressor gene. TAp63gamma employs the same DNA recognition site for this activation as p53. We observe expression patterns of p53, p63 and maspin proteins in tumor tissue that may indicate also a function of maspin induction by p63 in tumors.

SIRF--a novel regulator element controlling transcription from the p55Cdc/Fizzy promoter during the cell cycle

p55Cdc proteins participate in activation and timing of ubiquitin ligation by APC/C. Labeling of the substrates with ubiquitin leads to degradation of the cell cycle proteins through the proteasome in mitosis. Consistent with the phase in which the protein functions p55Cdc mRNA is expressed during the cell cycle starting in S phase with a maximum in G2/M. We analyzed the human p55Cdc promoter responsible for this expression pattern and found with SIRF (Cell-Cycle Site-Regulating p55Cdc/Fizzy-Transcription) a novel element which downregulates transcription in a cell cycle-dependent manner. Activation of gene transcription is independent of the SIRF element and NF-Y. The nucleotide sequence of SIRF is essentially identical in human, rat, and mouse p55Cdc whereas other parts of the promoter are not conserved. SIRF requires its natural promoter context for its regulatory function. With a length of 44 nucleotides this element is unusually long and may require a large protein complex for its regulation.

Identification of Tcf-4 as a transcriptional target of p53 signalling

T-cell factor (Tcf)-4 is a main transcription factor to pass on Wnt/beta-catenin signalling. The tumour suppressor protein p53 contributes as a transcription factor to cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis induction. Mutations of components in p53 and Wnt/beta-catenin signalling networks play a part in tumour formation. Here, we identify the Tcf-4 gene as a downstream effector of p53. Induction of wild-type p53 in a tet-off regulated human colon cell system leads to the reduction of Tcf-4 mRNA and protein levels. Also, mRNA of the Tcf-4 target gene uPAR is downregulated after p53 induction. Expression of a luciferase reporter controlled by the Tcf-4 promoter is repressed by wild-type p53, but not by a p53 mutant deficient in DNA binding. Such a regulation is seen in cell lines of different origin. These findings directly link Wnt/beta-catenin signalling and p53 tumour suppressor function and may provide a mechanism by which loss of p53 function contributes to progression in the adenoma/carcinoma sequence in colon tumours. Furthermore, since Tcf-4 is expressed in many tissues and downregulation of Tcf-4 by p53 is seen in several different cell types, this regulation likely plays a role in proliferation control of all tissues that can express p53 and Tcf-4.

Dynamic recruitment of NF-Y and histone acetyltransferases on cell-cycle promoters

Regulation of transcription during the cell-cycle is under the control of E2 factors (E2Fs), often in cooperation with nuclear factor Y (NF-Y), a histone-like CCAAT-binding trimer. NF-Y is paradigmatic of a constitutive, ubiquitous factor that pre-sets the promoter architecture for other regulatory proteins to access it. We analyzed the recruitment of NF-Y, E2F1/4/6, histone acetyltransferases, and histone deacetylase (HDAC) 1/3/4 to several cell-cycle promoters by chromatin immunoprecipitation assays in serum-starved and restimulated NIH3T3 cells. NF-Y binding is not constitutive but timely regulated in all promoters tested, being displaced when promoters are repressed. p300 association correlates with activation, and it is never found in the absence of NF-Y, whereas PCAF/hGCN5 is often found before NF-Y association. E2F4 and E2F6, together with HDACs, are bound to repressed promoters, including the G2/M Cyclin B2. As expected, an inverse relationship between HDACs association and histones H3/H4 acetylation is observed. Blocking cells in G1 with the cyclin-dependent kinase 2 inhibitor R-roscovitine confirms that NF-Y is bound to G1/S but not to G2/M promoters in G1. These data indicate that following the release of E2Fs/HDACs, a hierarchy of PCAF-NF-Y-p300 interactions and H3-H4 acetylations are required for activation of cell-cycle promoters.

Three CCAAT-boxes and a single cell cycle genes homology region (CHR) are the major regulating sites for transcription from the human cyclin B2 promoter

Cyclins are essential regulators of the cell division cycle. Cyclin B associates with the cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (cdc2) to form a complex which is required for cells to undergo mitosis. In mammalian cells three B-type cyclins have been characterised, cyclin B1, B2 and B3. The cell cycle-dependent synthesis of cyclin B1 and B2 has been investigated in detail displaying maximum expression in G2 which is mainly regulated on the transcriptional level. We have previously shown that this regulation of the mouse cyclin B2 promoter is controlled by a cell cycle-dependent element (CDE) and the cell cycle genes homology region (CHR). Also in a number of other genes CDE/CHR elements repress transcription in G0 and G1 and lead to relief of repression later during the cell cycle. Here, we compare human and mouse cyclin B2 promoters. Both promoters share only nine regions with nucleotide identities. Three of these sites are CCAAT-boxes spaced 33 bp apart which can bind the NF-Y transcriptional activator. NF-Y binding to the human cyclin B2 promoter could be shown by chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays. Activation by NF-Y is responsible for more than 93% of the total promoter activity as measured by cotransfecting a plasmid coding for a dominant-negative form of NF-YA. Cell cycle-dependent repression is regulated solely through a CHR. Surprisingly, in contrast to the mouse promoter the CHR in the human cyclin B2 promoter does not rely on a CDE site in tandem with it. Together with the recently described mouse cdc25C promoter, human cyclin B2 is the second identified gene which solely requires a CHR for its cell cycle regulation.