Long-term use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs and hormone replacement therapy in the management of endometriosis: a randomized trial with a 6-year follow-up

Pituitary Suppression with Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist Prior to Artificial Endometrial Preparation in Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer Cycles: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Different Protocols and Infertile Populations

This study investigates the effect of GnRHa pretreatment on pregnancy outcomes in artificial endometrial preparation for frozen-thawed embryo transfer (AC-FET) cycles. A systematic review of English language studies published before 1 September 2022, was conducted, excluding conference papers and preprints. Forty-one studies involving 43,021 participants were analyzed using meta-analysis, with a sensitivity analysis ensuring result robustness. The study found that GnRHa pretreatment generally improved the clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), implantation rate (IR), and live birth rate (LBR). However, discrepancies existed between randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies; RCTs showed no significant differences in outcomes for GnRHa-treated cycles. Depot GnRHa protocols outperformed daily regimens in LBR. Extended GnRHa pretreatment (two to five cycles) significantly improved CPR and IR compared to shorter treatment. Women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) saw substantial benefits from GnRHa pretreatment, including improved CPR and LBR and reduced miscarriage rates. In contrast, no significant benefits were observed in women with regular menstruation. More rigorous research is needed to solidify these findings.

Endometriosis and physical activity: A narrative review

Endometriosis is a painful gynecological disorder that affects many women. Constant treatments and contraception changes affect women looking for solutions to treat and limit the problems caused by endometriosis. The current narrative review discusses the effects of physical activity on the management, pain, and quality of life in patients with endometriosis. Findings suggest that body awareness practices such as Hatha yoga, the Jacobson method, and progressive muscle relaxation reduce pain and stress and improve the quality of life associated with endometriosis. It also highlights the current knowledge gap on available evidence and future research. Moreover, care must be taken when considering patients' physical abilities and goals and avoiding intense physical activities. The forms of endometriosis and its symptoms vary from one woman to another, so it is important to perform studies with various nonmedicinal or surgical techniques. It is important to continue randomized controlled trials to obtain more data on the benefits of physical activity in women with endometriosis and also to identify what types of activities could be beneficial to combat pain symptoms and improve the daily lives of women with endometriosis.

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues for endometriosis

BACKGROUND

Endometriosis is a common gynaecological condition affecting 6 to 11% of reproductive-age women and may cause dyspareunia, dysmenorrhoea, and infertility. One treatment strategy is medical therapy with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues (GnRHas) to reduce pain due to endometriosis. One of the adverse effects of GnRHas is a decreased bone mineral density. In addition to assessing the effect on pain, quality of life, most troublesome symptom and patients' satisfaction, the current review also evaluated the effect on bone mineral density and risk of adverse effects in women with endometriosis who use GnRHas versus other treatment options.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness and safety of GnRH analogues (GnRHas) in the treatment of painful symptoms associated with endometriosis and to determine the effects of GnRHas on bone mineral density of women with endometriosis.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility (CGF) Group trials register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and the trial registries in May 2022 together with reference checking and contact with study authors and experts in the field to identify additional studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) which compared GnRHas with other hormonal treatment options, including analgesics, danazol, intra-uterine progestogens, oral or injectable progestogens, gestrinone and also GnRHas compared with no treatment or placebo. Trials comparing GnRHas versus GnRHas in conjunction with add-back therapy (hormonal or non-hormonal) or calcium-regulation agents were also included in this review.  DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methodology as recommended by Cochrane. Primary outcomes are relief of overall pain and the objective measurement of bone mineral density. Secondary outcomes include adverse effects, quality of life, improvement in the most troublesome symptoms and patient satisfaction.  Due to high risk of bias associated with some of the studies, primary analyses of all review outcomes were restricted to studies at low risk of selection bias. Sensitivity analysis including all studies was then performed.

MAIN RESULTS

Seventy-two studies involving 7355 patients were included. The evidence was very low to low quality: the main limitations of all studies were serious risk of bias due to poor reporting of study methods, and serious imprecision.  Trials comparing GnRHas versus no treatment  We did not identify any studies. Trials comparing GnRHas versus placebo There may be a decrease in overall pain, reported as pelvic pain scores (RR 2.14; 95% CI 1.41 to 3.24, 1 RCT, n = 87, low-certainty evidence), dysmenorrhoea scores (RR 2.25; 95% CI 1.59 to 3.16, 1 RCT, n = 85, low-certainty evidence), dyspareunia scores (RR 2.21; 95% CI 1.39 to 3.54, 1 RCT, n = 59, low-certainty evidence), and pelvic tenderness scores (RR 2.28; 95% CI 1.48 to 3.50, 1 RCT, n = 85, low-certainty evidence) after three months of treatment. We are uncertain of the effect for pelvic induration, based on the results found after three months of treatment (RR 1.07; 95% CI 0.64 to 1.79, 1 RCT, n = 81, low-certainty evidence). Besides, treatment with GnRHas may be associated with a greater incidence of hot flushes at three months of treatment (RR 3.08; 95% CI 1.89 to 5.01, 1 RCT, n = 100, low-certainty evidence). Trials comparing GnRHas versus danazol For overall pain, for women treated with either GnRHas or danazol, a subdivision was made between pelvic tenderness, partly resolved and completely resolved. We are uncertain about the effect on relief of overall pain, when a subdivision was made for overall pain (MD -0.30; 95% CI -1.66 to 1.06, 1 RCT, n = 41, very low-certainty evidence), pelvic pain (MD 0.20; 95% CI -0.26 to 0.66, 1 RCT, n = 41, very low-certainty evidence), dysmenorrhoea (MD 0.10; 95% CI -0.49 to 0.69, 1 RCT, n = 41, very low-certainty evidence), dyspareunia (MD -0.20; 95% CI -0.77 to 0.37, 1 RCT, n = 41, very low-certainty evidence), pelvic induration (MD -0.10; 95% CI -0.59 to 0.39, 1 RCT, n = 41, very low-certainty evidence), and pelvic tenderness (MD -0.20; 95% CI -0.78 to 0.38, 1 RCT, n = 41, very low-certainty evidence) after three months of treatment. For pelvic pain (MD 0.50; 95% CI 0.10 to 0.90, 1 RCT, n = 41, very low-certainty evidence) and pelvic induration (MD 0.70; 95% CI 0.21 to 1.19, 1 RCT, n = 41, very low-certainty evidence), the complaints may decrease slightly after treatment with GnRHas, compared to danazol, for six months of treatment. Trials comparing GnRHas versus analgesics  We did not identify any studies. Trials comparing GnRHas versus intra-uterine progestogens We did not identify any low risk of bias studies. Trials comparing GnRHas versus GnRHas in conjunction with calcium-regulating agents There may be a slight decrease in bone mineral density (BMD) after 12 months treatment with GnRHas, compared to GnRHas in conjunction with calcium-regulating agents for anterior-posterior spine (MD -7.00; 95% CI -7.53 to -6.47, 1 RCT, n = 41, very low-certainty evidence) and lateral spine (MD -12.40; 95% CI -13.31 to -11.49, 1 RCT, n = 41, very low-certainty evidence).  AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: For relief of overall pain, there may be a slight decrease in favour of treatment with GnRHas compared to placebo or oral or injectable progestogens. We are uncertain about the effect when comparing GnRHas with danazol, intra-uterine progestogens or gestrinone. For BMD, there may be a slight decrease when women are treated with GnRHas, compared to gestrinone. There was a bigger decrease of BMD in favour of GnRHas, compared to GnRHas in conjunction with calcium-regulating agents. However, there may be a slight increase in adverse effects when women are treated with GnRHas, compared to placebo or gestrinone. Due to a very low to low certainty of the evidence, a wide range of outcome measures and a wide range of outcome measurement instruments, the results should be interpreted with caution.

Short- and long-term impact of gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue treatment on bone loss and fracture

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues (GnRH-a) are commonly utilized in moderate to severe endometriosis to induce atrophy of endometriotic lesions. Unfortunately, cessation of therapy can lead to recurrence of symptoms. Therefore, long term therapy is sometimes necessary. GnRH analogues cause an immediate decrease in bone mineral density which usually recovers after cessation of its use. However, this recovery in bone mineral density may not always occur after long term use. In order to prevent the deleterious effects on bone, add-back therapy is used frequently. This review will explore the impact of GnRH analogues on both bone loss and fracture risk as well as describe different add-back regimens.

Mast cell stabilizer ketotifen reduces hyperalgesia in a rodent model of surgically induced endometriosis

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the effect of oral treatment with ketotifen, a mast cell (MC) stabilizer, in a rat model of surgically induced endometriosis. Methods: At 14 days after Sprague-Dawley rats had surgery, they were treated with ketotifen (1 or 10 mg/kg/day). Pain behaviors were evaluated 3 days prior to surgery and then at 7, 14, 21, and 28 days after surgery. At day 28, rats were sacrificed and all samples were then processed for biochemical studies. Results: We found that ketotifen-treated rats showed significantly shorter duration of hyperalgesia (p<0.05); smaller cyst diameter (p<0.05) and lower histopathologic score (p<0.001); significantly lower MC number and degranulation (p<0.001), blood vessel number (p<0.001), lower expression levels of nerve growth factor (p<0.001), cyclooxygenase-2 (p<0.001), intercellular cell adhesion molecule-1 (p<0.001), and vascular endothelial growth factor (p<0.05) in cysts, and nerve growth factor (p<0.001) and transient receptor potential cation channel, subfamily V, member 1 (p<0.001) in dorsal root ganglia; and lower histamine (p<0.05) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (p<0.05) concentrations in serum compared with placebo-treated animal subjects. Conclusion: Oral treatment with ketotifen significantly suppressed the development of hyperalgesia, probably by modulating MC activity in cysts, thereby reducing peripheral sensitization due to noxious signals from endometriotic lesions. Our results suggest that ketotifen may inhibit the development of endometriotic lesions and hyperalgesia in rats.

[Progress on medical treatment in the management of adenomyosis]

Drug therapy plays an important role in alleviating the symptoms related to adenomyosis, improving the curative effect of surgery, delaying the progress of disease and promoting assisted reproduction. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the first choice to control pain associated with adenomyosis, and are the only choice for patients with recent fertility requirements; steroid hormones, gonadotropin releasing hormone agonists and mifepristone can effectively relieve pain and control uterine bleeding, among which oral contraceptives, levonorgestrel-releasing intranterine system (Mirena) and dienogest are more effective and commonly used in clinic. Drug selection should be based on patient's age, symptoms, uterine size, fertility requirements and economical conditions. At present, there is no specific drug for adenomyosis, and symptoms are easy to recur after drug withdrawal, so the long-term drug use needs further study.

Regulatory Perspectives in Pharmacometric Models of Osteoporosis

Osteoporosis is a disorder of the bones in which they are weakened to the extent that they become more prone to fracture. There are various forms of osteoporosis: some of them are induced by drugs, and others occur as a chronic progressive disorder as an individual gets older. As the median age of the population rises across the world, the chronic form of the bone disease is drawing attention as an important worldwide health issue. Developing new treatments for osteoporosis and comparing them with existing treatments are complicated processes due to current acceptance by regulatory authorities of bone mineral density (BMD) and fracture risk as clinical end points, which require clinical trials to be large, prolonged, and expensive to determine clinically significant impacts in BMD and fracture risk. Moreover, changes in BMD and fracture risk are not always correlated, with some clinical trials showing BMD improvement without a reduction in fractures. More recently, bone turnover markers specific to bone formation and resorption have been recognized that reflect bone physiology at a cellular level. These bone turnover markers change faster than BMD and fracture risk, and mathematically linking the biomarkers via a computational model to BMD and/or fracture risk may help in predicting BMD and fracture risk changes over time during the progression of a disease or when under treatment. Here, we discuss important concepts of bone physiology, osteoporosis, treatment options, mathematical modeling of osteoporosis, and the use of these models by the pharmaceutical industry and the Food and Drug Administration.

Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptor Antagonist Mono- and Combination Therapy With Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate Add-Back: Pharmacodynamics and Safety of OBE2109

Context

OBE2109 is a potent, oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor antagonist being developed for the treatment of sex-hormone-dependent diseases in women.

Objective

We assessed the pharmacodynamics and safety of OBE2109 alone and combined with estradiol (E2)/norethindrone acetate (NETA) add-back therapy on E2 levels and vaginal bleeding.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This was a single-center, open-label, randomized, parallel-group study in 76 healthy premenopausal women.

Interventions

Women were randomly assigned to take the following doses (in milligrams) once daily for 6 weeks: OBE2109, 100 or 200; or OBE2109/E2/NETA, 100/0.5/0.1, or 100/1.0/0.5, or 200/1.0/0.5.

Main Outcome Measures

E2 concentrations, bleeding pattern, exploratory bone metabolism biomarkers, and adverse events.

Results

OBE2109 100 mg and 200 mg alone reduced E2 levels to reach median levels of 19.5 and 3.2 pg/mL, respectively, at week 4. Median E2 levels after combined OBE2109/add-back therapy ranged between 25 and 40 pg/mL. OBE2109 100 mg or 200 mg alone induced amenorrhea. By day 15, >85% of women had no vaginal bleeding during the last 4 weeks of treatment. Add-back therapy partially impaired bleeding control: The highest amenorrhea rate (53%) was observed with OBE2109 100 mg/1.0 mg/0.5 mg. The addition of E2/NETA, particularly at 1 mg/0.5 mg, mitigated the increase of two bone markers induced by OBE2109 200 mg.

Conclusion

OBE2109 promptly lowered E2 levels. Add-back therapy may be required to prevent adverse effects on bone in women treated with the 200-mg dose (at 100 mg in some women). These results provide a basis for OBE2109 regimen selection to treat sex-hormone-dependent diseases.

Laparoscopic surgery with urinary tract reconstruction and bowel endometriosis resection for deep infiltrating endometriosis

Deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) is the most severe form of endometriosis. It causes chronic pelvic pain, severe dysmenorrhea, deep dyspareunia, dyschezia, and dysuria, markedly impairing the quality of life of women of reproductive age. A number of randomized controlled trials on surgical and medical treatments to reduce the pain associated with endometriosis have been reported, but few have focused on this in DIE. DIE causes not only pain but also functional invasion to the urinary organs and bowel, such as hydronephrosis and bowel stenosis. In addition to DIE resection, surgical treatment involves adhesion separation as well as resection and reconstruction of the urinary organs and bowel; high-level skills are required. The severity of DIE should be evaluated preoperatively as accurately as possible. Using ENZIAN in conjunction with the AFS (The revised American Fertility Society classification of endometriosis) classification makes a more detailed assessment of DIE possible. The operative procedures used for laparoscopic resection of urinary DIE and reconstruction of the urinary organs are chosen based on the type of lesion (intrinsic/extrinsic) and length of stenosis. In addition to ureteroneocystostomy, the psoas bladder hitch and Boari bladder flap procedures are applied when necessary to extend the urinary tract. Bowel resection for bowel endometriosis is classified into classic segmental resection and conservative approaches (shaving/discoid). When these procedures are employed, it is advisable to work in consultation with urologists and gastroenterologists and to inform the patients of the associated risks and outcomes. Furthermore, postoperative medication is essential because it is difficult to conduct repeated surgeries.

Selective Estrogen-Receptor Modulators and Aromatase Inhibitors: Promising New Medical Therapies for Endometriosis?

Endometriosis is an estrogen-dependent disease and estrogen-related pathways are imbalanced in women with endometriosis. One of the key enzymes in estrogen synthesis is aromatase. Inhibiting this pathway at several points is a promising idea for the treatment of endometriosis. The third generation of aromatase inhibitors is becoming more potent in efficacy, with fewer side effects than previous generations, but cotreatment with other hormones is needed to inhibit ovarian stimulation. Other components that promote estrogen synthesis such as COX-2 can also be potentially targeted. Selective estrogen-receptor modulators could also be interesting in view of their tissue-specific effect. However, all these new drugs are still in an early phase of development. At present, it is too early to conclude that aromatase inhibitors, COX-2 inhibitors or selective estrogen-receptor modulators really present any added value compared with the existing drugs that can be used to achieve hormonal suppression in the medical treatment of endometriosis.

Effects of cisplatin and letrozole on surgically induced endometriosis and comparison of the two medications in a rat model

This study was to investigate the effects of cisplatin (CDDP) and letrozole on surgically induced endometriosis and comparison of the two drugs in a rat model. Endometriosis was surgically induced by autologous transplantation of endometrial pieces. Thirty model rats were divided into three groups, randomly. Group 1 (n=10) served as control and received no medication. Group 2 (n=10) received 0.2mg/kg/day of oral letrozole. Group 3 (n=10) received 35mg/m(2) CDDP via peritoneal perfusion every four days. All the rats were treated for 24days. The growth and histologic score of the implants were evaluated. The proliferation- and angiogenesis-associated proteins were assessed using immunohistochemistry and western blotting. The serum sex hormones were assayed using ELISA. After the medication, the growth and histologic score of the implants were significantly lower in the 2 and 3 groups than in the control group. The protein expressions of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), aromatase P450 (P450arom), transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β), and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2, were significantly lower in groups 2 and 3 than in the control group. Further, the P450arom level was lower in the letrozole group than in the CDDP group. The TGF-β and MMP-2 levels were lower in the CDDP group than in the letrozole group. Serum T level was significantly higher in the letrozole group, and serum E2 level was lower in the letrozole group. In conclusion, cisplatin and letrozole caused similar regression of the implants in the endometriosis model rats. But their effects on the proliferation- and angiogenesis-associated protein expressions and the serum sex hormone levels were different. Cisplatin and letrozole might cause the effects in the endometriotic foci through different mechanism.

Analogs of Luteinizing Hormone-Releasing Hormone in the Treatment of Endometriosis

Agonists of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) induce a reversible hypoestrogenic state through the down-regulation of LHRH receptors and desensitization of the pituitary. Since endometrial implants are estrogen sensitive, LHRH agonists have frequently been used for medical treatment of endometriosis. Nowadays, LHRH agonists can be considered in general as a second-line medical treatment for endometriosis-related symptoms, as oral therapy with dienogest is as effective and has fewer side effects. However, therapy with LHRH agonists for 3-6 months prior to in vitro fertilization remains the treatment of choice in patients with endometriosis, as it significantly increases pregnancy rates.

LHRH agonists are used prior to surgery and as an adjuvant after an operation to prevent recurrence or prolong disease-free intervals. Adverse effects of LHRH agonists are due to hypoestrogenism and include hot flushes, vaginal dryness, loss of libido, sleep disturbances and a diminished bone density which limits the duration of their administration to 6 months. For long-term treatment, add-back of estrogen and/or progestin,/or progestin only with or without bisphosphonates, can be used, but existing studies only cover a 12-month period of treatment.

LHRH antagonists competitively block the pituitary receptors for LHRH. Consequently, a partial pharmacological hypophysectomy with a reduction of the estrogen levels to a desired level is possible if LHRH antagonists are adequately dosed. As endometriotic implants require relatively high levels of estrogen, partially lower plasma levels of estrogens are sufficient to prevent the loss of bone density. A long-term treatment without add-back therapy is also possible.

Management of endocrine disease: Secondary osteoporosis: pathophysiology and management

Osteoporosis is a skeletal disorder characterized by decreased mass and compromised bone strength predisposing to an increased risk of fractures. Although idiopathic osteoporosis is the most common form of osteoporosis, secondary factors may contribute to the bone loss and increased fracture risk in patients presenting with fragility fractures or osteoporosis. Several medical conditions and medications significantly increase the risk for bone loss and skeletal fragility. This review focuses on some of the common causes of osteoporosis, addressing the underlying mechanisms, diagnostic approach and treatment of low bone mass in the presence of these conditions.

Discovery and optimization of novel antagonists to the human neurokinin-3 receptor for the treatment of sex-hormone disorders (Part I)

Neurokinin-3 receptor (NK3R) has recently emerged as important in modulating the tonic pulsatile gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) release. We therefore decided to explore NK3R antagonists as therapeutics for sex-hormone disorders that can potentially benefit from lowering GnRH pulsatility with consequent diminished levels of plasma luteinizing hormone (LH) and correspondingly attenuated levels of circulating androgens and estrogens. The discovery and lead optimization of a novel N-acyl-triazolopiperazine NK3R antagonist chemotype achieved through bioisosteric lead change from the high-throughput screening (HTS) hit is described. A concomitant improvement in the antagonist bioactivity and ligand lipophilic efficiency (LLE) parameter were the principal guidelines in the lead optimization efforts. Examples of advanced lead analogues to demonstrate the amenability of this chemotype to achieving a suitable pharmacokinetic (PK) profile are provided as well as pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PKPD) correlations to analyze the trends observed for LH inhibition in castrated rats and monkeys that served as preliminary in vivo efficacy models.

Adverse skeletal effects of drugs - beyond Glucocorticoids

Osteoporotic fractures are an important public health problem with significant individual and societal costs. In addition to the major risk factors for osteoporotic fracture, low bone mineral density (BMD), age, low body weight and history of fracture or falls, some drugs are now considered to be important secondary risk factor for bone loss and fracture, particularly amongst predisposed individuals. Currently available data are often generated from small observational clinical studies, making risk assessment and development of management guidelines difficult. In many cases, the exposed population has a low baseline risk for fracture and additional assessment and treatment may not be necessary. In this review, we focus on drugs other than glucocorticoids identified as potentially causing adverse skeletal effects, summarizing the existing evidence from preclinical and clinical studies, and suggest recommendations for patient management.

Clinical efficacy of add-back therapy in treatment of endometriosis: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

A meta-analysis was conducted to determine the effectiveness of using gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues (GnRH-a), both with and without hormonal add-back therapy, for the management of endometriosis.

METHODS

Cochrane library, Ovid (Embase) and Pubmed databases were searched between the years 1998 and 2013 for published, prospective, randomised controlled trials (RCT) that assessed the effectiveness of "add-back" therapy for EMs treatment. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan V5.0. The main outcome measures were as follows: lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) immediately after treatment and after 6 months of follow-up; femoral neck BMD; serum estradiol levels; changes in the Kupperman index score; the pelvic pain score, including dysmenorrhoea and dyspareunia; and pelvic tenderness.

RESULTS

A total of 13 RCT, including 945 participants, were identified. The evidence suggested that "add-back" therapy was more effective for symptom relief than GnRH-a alone. BMD was significantly different when comparing "add-back" therapy to GnRH-a alone, both immediately after treatment and at 6 months. The "add-back" therapy increased serum oestrogen and did not reduce the efficacy of GnRH-a for treating dysmenorrhoea and dyspareunia. A variety of add-back regimens had a same effect for the treatment of endometriosis.

CONCLUSIONS

"Add-back" therapy, based on the GnRH-a dose, does not reduce the efficacy of using GNRH-a for the management of endometriosis. "Add-back" therapy reduced the occurrence of side effects that can occur with GnRH-a therapy alone, such as osteoporosis and menopausal syndrome. There were no statistically significant differences when comparing the effectiveness of a variety of "add-back" regimens to each other.

The use of gonadotropin releasing hormone analogues in adolescent and young patients with endometriosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Endometriosis is increasingly being recognized and diagnosed in adolescents. As a result of this earlier diagnosis, treatment with agents like gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) begins earlier and may last longer. Long-term effects of GnRHa treatment for endometriosis are of concern when treating adolescents.

RECENT FINDINGS

GnRHas are used for adolescents with surgically confirmed endometriosis. GnRHa treatment is effective for pain reduction, but is associated with menopausal symptoms and decreases in bone density. Different regimens of hormonal add-back therapy have been studied in adults to attempt to prevent these side-effects.

SUMMARY

GnRHa therapy is a highly effective, nonsurgical treatment option for many adolescents with endometriosis, but is accompanied by side-effects of bone loss and menopausal symptoms. Side-effects may be decreased by introducing appropriate add-back therapy. Monitoring of bone density by DXA is recommended for prolonged use of GnRHa in adolescents.

Model-based drug development: a rational approach to efficiently accelerate drug development

The pharmaceutical industry continues to face significant challenges. Very few compounds that enter development reach the marketplace, and the investment required for each success can surpass $1.8 billion. Despite attempts to improve efficiency and increase productivity, total investment continues to rise whereas the output of new medicines declines. With costs increasing exponentially through each development phase, it is failure in phase II and phase III that is most wasteful. In today's development paradigm, late-stage failure is principally a result of insufficient efficacy. This is manifested as either a failure to differentiate sufficiently from placebo (shown for both novel and precedented mechanisms) or a failure to demonstrate sufficient differentiation from existing compounds. Set in this context, this article will discuss the role model-based drug development (MBDD) approaches can and do play in accelerating and optimizing compound development strategies through a series of illustrative examples.

Integrated pharmacometrics and systems pharmacology model-based analyses to guide GnRH receptor modulator development for management of endometriosis

Endometriosis is a gynecological condition resulting from proliferation of endometrial-like tissue outside the endometrial cavity. Estrogen suppression therapies, mediated through gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) modulation, decrease endometriotic implants and diminish associated pain albeit at the expense of bone mineral density (BMD) loss. Our goal was to provide model-based guidance for GnRH-modulating clinical programs intended for endometriosis management. This included developing an estrogen suppression target expected to provide symptomatic relief with minimal BMD loss and to evaluate end points and study durations supportive of efficient development decisions. An existing multiscale model of calcium and bone was adapted to include systematic estrogen pharmacologic effects to describe estrogen concentration-related effects on BMD. A logistic regression fit to patient-level data from three clinical GnRH agonist (nafarelin) studies described the relationship of estrogen with endometrial-related pain. Targeting estradiol between 20 and 40 pg/ml was predicted to provide efficacious endometrial pain response while minimizing BMD effects.

Dienogest, a new conservative strategy for extragenital endometriosis: a pilot study

Extragenital endometriosis severely impairs the quality of life for affected women but its standard management has not yet been well established because of its relatively low incidence. As extragenital organs, intestine, followed by urinary tract, is the most common place affected by endometriosis, for which surgical treatment is sometimes difficult and accompanied by severe complications. Recently, dienogest, a novel progestin, has emerged as a new alternative for endometriosis, especially for endometriosis-associated pain. In this report, we presented four cases with rectosigmoidal and one with bladder endometriosis, treated with oral 2 mg/day dienogest for over 6 months. For all cases, the measurable extragenital lesions exhibited the reduction in their size after 10 to 11 months of use, accompanied with immediate relief of subjective symptoms related with extragenital lesions. This report suggests that dienogest can be a novel conservative alternative for extragenital endometriosis.

Estrogen-biosynthesis gene CYP17 and its interactions with reproductive, hormonal and lifestyle factors in breast cancer risk: results from the Long Island Breast Cancer Study Project

The genes that are involved in estrogen biosynthesis, cellular binding and metabolism may contribute to breast cancer susceptibility. We examined the effect of the CYP17 promoter T --> C polymorphism and its interactions with the reproductive history, exogenous hormone use and selected lifestyle risk factors on breast cancer risk among 1037 population-based incident cases and 1096 population-based controls in the Long Island Breast Cancer Study Project. Overall, there were no associations between the CYP17 genotype and breast cancer risk. Among postmenopausal women, the joint exposure to higher body mass index (BMI) and the variant C allele was associated with an increased risk of breast cancer [odds ratio (OR), 1.60; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.15-2.22]. The joint exposure to the variant C allele and long-term use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) (>51 months) was related to an increased risk of breast cancer (OR, 1.51; 95% CI, 0.99-2.31) especially estrogen receptor-positive, progesterone receptor-positive breast cancer (OR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.08-3.25). Among the control population, the CYP17 variant C allele was inversely associated with long-term use of postmenopausal HRT and a higher BMI in postmenopausal women. In conclusion, the findings suggest that the CYP17 variant C allele may increase breast cancer risk in conjunction with long-term HRT use and high BMI in postmenopausal women.

The pharmacologic management of premenstrual dysphoric disorder

Premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) is characterized by physical, affective and behavioral symptoms that are linked to the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle and relieved soon after the onset of menses. The disorder is chronic and exerts a major impact on personal relationships and occupational productivity for the estimated 6% of reproductive-aged women who fulfill strict PMDD criteria and the almost 20% of women who nearly meet these criteria. There are now various pharmacologic options that have demonstrated efficacy for PMDD and two of these approaches have an approved indication for treatment from the US FDA: three selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors; and for women who also desire hormonal contraception, a low dose oral contraceptive pill containing the progestin drospirenone, in a new dosing regimen. Due to the unique pathophysiology of the disorder, the selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors can be effectively administered intermittently, with dosing limited to the luteal phase of the cycle (2 weeks prior to menses). In the future, new pharmacotherapy will likely evolve from research evaluating other hormonal formulations that inhibit ovulation, without simulating PMDD-like symptoms, or novel pharmacologic agents that modulate the central neurotransmission.

Uterine myomas: management

OBJECTIVE

To review the currently available literature regarding the current management alternatives available to women with uterine myomas.

DESIGN

Literature review of 198 articles pertaining to uterine myomas.

RESULT(S)

Many advances have been made in the management of uterine myomas. Watchful waiting; medical therapy; hysteroscopic myomectomy; endometrial ablation; laparoscopic myomectomy; abdominal myomectomy; abdominal, vaginal, and laparoscopic hysterectomy; uterine artery embolization; uterine artery occlusion; and focused ultrasound are now available.

CONCLUSION(S)

Many options are now available to women with uterine myomas. The presently available literature regarding the treatment of myomas is summarized.

GnRH analogs: options for endometriosis-associated pain treatment

While none of the currently available treatment options for endometriosis pain resolved the underlying disease process, there are growing numbers of medical alternatives available. Medical options include the GnRH agonists and antagonists. Review of these treatments in the management of endometriosis pain and the insight often to the etiology of endometriosis are presented for discussion.

Treatment of dysfunctional uterine bleeding in the perimenopause: the effects of adding combined estradiol/norethisterone acetate therapy to goserelin acetate treatment--a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effects of adding combined estradiol/norethisterone acetate therapy (CENT) to goserelin acetate treatment (GA) of dysfunctional uterine bleeding (DUB) in perimenopausal women.

METHODS

In a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial followed by an open follow-up study, 31 perimenopausal women with DUB were recruited from gynecological outpatient departments of two Dutch hospitals and randomized for treatment with either GA/placebo or GA/CENT for 6 months followed by 18 months of GA/CENT for all. The main outcome measures were abdominal pain, number of bleeding days, double-layer endometrial thickness (DET), Greene climacteric score (GCS), visual analog scale for well-being, bone mineral density (BMD) and mammographic density (BI-RAD score).

RESULTS

Abdominal pain, number of bleeding days and DET decreased in both groups, the between-group difference in decrease not being statistically significant. GCS initially showed significant improvement in the GA/CENT group. BMD decreased significantly in the GA/placebo group (-4.1%) compared with the GA/CENT group (-0.3%). Another 18 months of GA/CENT did not result in a lasting difference in BMD between groups. BI-RAD scores did not differ significantly between or within the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Adding CENT to GA treatment for DUB in perimenopausal women initially prevented BMD loss and improved climacteric complaints, while having no negative impact on vaginal bleeding, abdominal pain or BI-RAD scores. However, prolonged treatment did not result in a lasting prevention of bone loss.

Long-term fracture risk among women with proven endometriosis

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether women with pelvic endometriosis are at increased fracture risk.

DESIGN

Historical cohort study.

SETTING

Population-based investigation using the data resources of the Rochester Epidemiology Project.

PATIENT(S)

From Olmsted County, Minnesota, 987 women with endometriosis that was first surgically visualized or histologically proven in 1970-1989.

INTERVENTION(S)

None, observational study.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Follow-up for fractures through complete inpatient and outpatient community medical records.

RESULT(S)

In 17,408 person-years of follow-up, 256 women experienced 449 different fractures. The cumulative incidence after 20 years (30.8%) was not elevated relative to that expected (30.6%). The independent predictors of any fracture included age (hazard ratio [HR] per 10 years: 1.61; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.42-1.84]), corticosteroid use (HR: 2.78; 95% CI 1.48-5.24), prior hip, spine, or forearm fracture (HR: 1.82; 95% CI 1.10-3.02), and use of the selective estrogen receptor modulators, tamoxifen or raloxifene (HR: 4.34; 95% CI 2.14-8.81); physical activity was protective (HR: 0.40; 95% CI 0.18-0.88). There was no significant influence on fracture risk of surgery or other medical treatments for endometriosis.

CONCLUSION(S)

Despite reported adverse effects of treatment on bone density, there was no overall increase in long-term fracture risk in this unselected cohort of women with proven endometriosis.

Cetrorelix in the treatment of female infertility and endometriosis

The use of cetrorelix within ovarian-stimulation protocols demonstrates several advantages compared with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist-containing protocols, which include, for example, significantly less time for analogue treatment and a reduction in the amount of gonadotropins needed. Furthermore, fewer side effects can be expected. There is no difference regarding endometrium quality and hormone profiles, and the results of assisted reproduction cycles are comparable. Cetrorelix also seems to be useful in the treatment of endometriosis which, in most cases, is an estrogen-dependent disease. Furthermore, fewer side effects occur with this agent (e.g., postmenopausal symptoms) and no estradiol add-back is needed. In the future, new nonpeptic GnRH antagonists are expected to be available for oral administration. Although they are still under investigation, these agents have the potential to improve patients' comfort and compliance.

Aromatase inhibitors: the next generation of therapeutics for endometriosis?

OBJECTIVE AND DESIGN

To review the role of aromatase inhibitors (AIs) in the treatment of endometriosis.

CONCLUSION(S)

Endometriosis is a common estrogen-dependent disorder that can result in substantial morbidity, including pelvic pain, multiple operations, and infertility. Approximately only half of women with endometriosis get pain relief from existing medical or surgical treatments. Medical treatments usually are directed at inhibiting estrogen action or its production from the ovaries and do not address local estrogen biosynthesis by the aromatase enzyme in endometriotic lesions. A single gene encodes aromatase, which is the final enzyme in the estrogen biosynthesis pathway, and its inhibition effectively eliminates estrogen production. The recently introduced highly specific AIs have successfully treated pelvic pain and significantly reduced the lesion size. In premenopausal women, an AI alone may induce ovarian folliculogenesis, and thus AIs are combined with a progestin, a combination oral contraceptive, or a GnRH analogue. The side-effect profile of AIs administered in combination with an oral contraceptive or a progestin is remarkably benign. We review herein the published clinical evidence for the use of AIs in the treatment of endometriosis.

The effect of physical training on bone mineral density in women with endometriosis treated with GnRH analogs: a pilot study

BACKGROUND

The effect of physical training on bone mineral density (BMD) in women with endometriosis treated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogs was studied.

METHODS

Nineteen Caucasian premenopausal women aged 23-38 years were included in the study. The subjects were all treated with 21.6 mg goserelin during 6 months. The patients were randomized to physical training n=8 or to a control group n=11. The total period of training was 12 months, whereas GnRH treatment was terminated after 6 months. BMD was measured in the femoral neck area and the lumbar spine using dual X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). This was performed just before treatment, after 6 months and after 12 months. Six women fulfilled the training during 12 months of observation. In the control group 10 women were followed up for 12 months.

RESULTS

After 6 months the women in the physical training group were 2.1% below baseline. Six months later these women had gained BMD in the femoral neck and were 0.6% below baseline. Those in the control group lost 2.8% after 6 months and were 3.6% below baseline after 12 months. The difference in loss of BMD after 12 months between the groups was significant 0.029. In the spine there was no significant difference between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Physical training in women with endometriosis was found to rebuild bone after treatment with GnRH analogs when compared to a control group. This effect could be demonstrated 6 months after cessation of GnRH treatment.

Leuprolide acetate treatment with and without coadministration of tibolone in premenopausal women with menstrual cycle–related irritable bowel syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRH-a) with or without coadministration of tibolone in women with menstrual cycle-related irritable bowel syndrome (IBS).

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

SETTING

Universities of Catanzaro and Naples.

PATIENT(S)

One hundred twenty young premenopausal women with menstrual cycle-related IBS (Rome II criteria).

INTERVENTION(S)

Administration of leuprolide acetate depot (LAD, 11.25 mg IM/3 months) plus tibolone (group A), LAD plus placebo tablets (group B), and injection of a placebo solution plus placebo tablets (group C).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Severity of bowel symptoms or signs of IBS and quality of life (QoL), at baseline and after 6 months of treatment.

RESULT(S)

In all groups, the mean scores for each symptom or sign of IBS and for QoL were significantly improved after treatment. A significant difference was observed between group C and groups A and B. No difference between these last groups was detected in symptoms or signs of IBS. The QoL scores were significantly higher in group A than in group B.

CONCLUSION(S)

Gondotropin-releasing hormone agonist administration is effective in women with menstrual cycle-related IBS. The addition of tibolone does not reduce effectiveness compared with agonist alone and increases QoL.

Add-back therapy in the treatment of endometriosis-associated pain

OBJECTIVE

To determine the efficacy of GnRH analogue plus add-back therapy compared with GnRH analogue alone and estroprogestin in patients with relapse of endometriosis-associated pain.

DESIGN

Randomized, controlled study.

SETTING

University hospital.

PATIENT(S)

One hundred thirty-three women with relapse of endometriosis-related pain after previous endometriosis surgery.

INTERVENTION(S)

Forty-six women were treated with GnRH analogue plus add-back therapy, 44 women were given GnRH analogue alone, and 43 women received estroprogestin, for 12 months.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Pain evaluation by a visual analogue scale, quality of life in treated patients according to the SF-36 questionnaire, and occurrence of adverse effects, including bone mass density loss, at pretreatment, after 6 months of treatment, at the end of treatment (12 months), and 6 months after discontinuation of treatment.

RESULT(S)

Patients treated either with GnRH analogue alone or GnRH analogue plus add-back therapy showed a higher reduction of pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, and dyspareunia than patients treated with oral contraceptive, whereas patients treated with add-back therapy showed a better quality of life, as assessed with the SF-36 questionnaire, and adverse effects rate than the other two groups.

CONCLUSION(S)

Add-back therapy allows the treatment of women with relapse of endometriosis-associated pain for a longer period, with reduced bone mineral density loss, good control of pain symptoms, and better patient quality of life compared with GnRH analogue alone or oral contraceptive.

Prolonged use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and tibolone as add-back therapy for the treatment of endometrial hyperplasia

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the response of the various hyperplastic disorders of the endometrium to a prolonged treatment with leuprolide acetate, a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a), plus tibolone, as add-back therapy, and further to study if the tibolone addition reduces the hypoestrogenic actions of the GnRH-analogue.

METHODS

We treated 26 women with histologically confirmed simple (n = 9), complex (n = 15) or atypical (n = 2) endometrial hyperplasia (EH) for 12 months with monthly injections of 1Ampulle/3.75 mg of leuprolide acetate, followed by tibolone, 2.5mg per day per os. Every woman underwent a hysteroscopic evaluation and biopsy of the endometrium after 3 (in cases with atypical EH), 6 and 12 months of treatment, as well as after 12 and 24 months of follow-up. The clinical, paraclinical and laboratory course of the disease was followed-up by using of a climacteric scoring system and by testing of various parameters.

RESULTS

The histopathologic evaluation of the endometria revealed regression of EH in all women after 12 months of treatment, however, during the first 2 years of follow-up EH reappeared in four women (4/21, 19%). Bone mineral density and serum parameters did not show significant changes during treatment, whereas only a mild suffering from hypoestrogenic side-effects was noted.

CONCLUSIONS

It seems that the combined GnRH-a/tibolone treatment in women with EH is a potent alternative, so far as the endometrial status and the clinical course of the disease are concerned, whereas tibolone appears to act sufficiently as add-back therapy to prolonged GnRH-a treatment. The probability of relapse of the disease during the follow-up period makes the close monitoring of the endometrium after cessation of the treatment absolutely necessary.

Prediction of the change in bone mineral density induced by gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist treatment for endometriosis

OBJECTIVE

To observe the long-term changes in bone metabolism induced by GnRH agonist (GnRHa) treatment and to determine the factor that affected the change in bone mineral density (BMD).

DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

SETTING

Department of obstetrics and gynecology in university and general hospitals.

PATIENT(S)

Fifty women with endometriosis treated with GnRHa between 1994 and 1996.

INTERVENTION(S)

Leuprolide acetate administered for 24 weeks. Bone mineral density measurement by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and collection of blood and urine samples were conducted until 12 months of posttreatment.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Spinal BMD and bone turnover markers.

RESULT(S)

Mean BMD percent changes from pretreatment were -4.9% and -3.4% at 6 months of treatment and at 12 months of posttreatment, respectively. When the patients were divided by the median pretreatment deoxypyridinoline (DP) level, recovery of BMD after GnRHa discontinuation was slower in the Low-DP group than in the High-DP group. A significant positive correlation was found between the pretreatment DP level and the percent change in BMD at 12 months of posttreatment. No significant relation between BMD and the other bone turnover markers was noted.

CONCLUSION(S)

Bone mineral density changes were diverse among patients who were administered GnRHa. The pretreatment DP level may be the predictive factor for GnRHa-induced BMD change.

Treatment of endometriosis and chronic pelvic pain with letrozole and norethindrone acetate: a pilot study

OBJECTIVE

To determine the role of an aromatase inhibitor, letrozole, in the treatment of reproductive-age women with endometriosis and associated chronic pelvic pain.

DESIGN

Phase 2, open-label, nonrandomized proof-of-concept study.

SETTING

Outpatient tertiary-care center.

PATIENT(S)

Ten patients with endometriosis, all previously treated both medically and surgically, with unsatisfactory results.

INTERVENTION(S)

Endometriosis was diagnosed by biopsy and scored from an initial diagnostic laparoscopy performed within 1 month before treatment was begun. Oral administration of letrozole (2.5 mg), the progestin norethindrone acetate (2.5 mg), calcium citrate (1,250 mg), and vitamin D (800 IU) was done daily for 6 months. Within 1-2 months after completion of the treatment, a second-look laparoscopy was performed to score and biopsy endometriosis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Changes in American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) scores for endometriosis, pelvic pain assessed by visual analog scale, serum hormone levels (FSH, LH, E(2), and estrone [E(1)]), and bone density (DEXA scan).

RESULT(S)

No histologically demonstrable endometriosis was present in any patient during the second-look laparoscopy. ASRM and pelvic pain scores decreased significantly in response to treatment. Overall, no significant change in bone density was detected. Gonadotropin levels were not significantly altered by treatment, and although circulating E(2) and E(1) levels were reduced, the decrease was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION(S)

The combination of letrozole and norethindrone acetate achieved marked reduction of laparoscopically visible and histologically confirmed endometriosis in all 10 patients and significant pain relief in nine out of 10 patients who had not responded previously to currently available treatments. On this basis, letrozole should be a candidate for the medical management of endometriosis.

Overview on the effects of progestins on bone

In view of the fact that fractures are the clinically relevant events, risk factors for fractures are discussed first. Bone mineral density (BMD) appears to be a much less important risk factor for the most severe hip fractures than the risk of falling. No results of experimental studies on hormones and fractures at advanced age are available. An overview of the effects of progestins on bone is given. Effects of progestins on bone have been studied by in vitro experiments using cell lines and by more relevant clinical observations. Prospective studies have been conducted following the use of progestins contained in oral contraceptives, alone or in combination with oestrogens; long-term contraception by injection of depot preparations; so-called "add-back" hormonal therapy attempting to reverse the adverse effects of gonadotropin releasing hormone agonists on bone and after different regimens of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in postmenopausal women. From the data there are no indications that the various progestins, used in clinical practice, have either a bone-protective or an oestrogen antagonistic activity. Progestins do not add or subtract much of the protective action of oestrogens on the bones.

Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues for endometriosis: bone mineral density

BACKGROUND

Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues (GnRHas) are generally well tolerated, and are effective in relieving the symptoms of endometriosis (Prentice 2003). Unfortunately the low oestrogen state that they induce is associated with adverse effects including an acceleration in bone mineral density (BMD) loss.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effect of treatment with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues (GnRHas) on the bone mineral density of women with endometriosis, compared to placebo, no treatment, or other treatments for endometriosis, including GnRHas with add-back therapy.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group's specialised register of controlled trials (23rd October 2002) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Cochrane Library, issue 4, 2002). We also carried out electronic searches of MEDLINE (1966 - March Week 2 2003) and EMBASE (1980 - March Week 2 2003). We also searched the reference lists of articles and contacted researchers in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Prospective, randomised controlled studies of the use of GnRHas for the treatment of women with endometriosis were considered, where bone density measurements were an end point. The control arm of the studies was either placebo, no treatment, another medical therapy for endometriosis, or GnRHas with add-back therapy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers (JF and MS) independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Study authors were contacted for additional information.

MAIN RESULTS

Thirty studies involving 2,391 women were included, however only 15, involving 910 women, could be included in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed that danazol and progesterone + oestrogen add-back are protective of BMD at the lumbar spine both during treatment and for up to six and twelve months after treatment, respectively. Between the groups receiving GnRHa and the groups receiving danazol/gestrinone, there was a significant difference in percentage change of BMD after six months of treatment, the GnRH analogue producing a reduction in BMD from baseline and danazol producing an increase in BMD (SMD -3.43, 95 % CI -3.91 to -2.95). Progesterone only add-back is not protective; after six months of treatment absolute value BMD measurements of the lumbar spine did not differ significantly from the group receiving GnRH analogues (SMD 0.15, 95 % CI -0.21 to 0.52). In the comparison of GnRHa versus GnRHa + HRT add-back, that is oestrogen + progesterone or oestrogen only, there was a significantly bigger BMD loss in the GnRHa only group (SMD -0.49, 95 % CI -0.77 to -0.21). These numbers reflect the absolute value measurements at the lumbar spine after six months of treatment. Due to the small number of studies in the comparison we are unable to conclude whether calcium-regulating agents are protective. No difference was found between low and high dose add-back regimes but again only one study was identified for this comparison. Only one study comparing GnRH analogues with placebo was identified, but the study gave no data. No studies comparing GnRH with the oral contraceptive pill (OCP) or progestagens were identified.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Both danazol and progesterone + oestrogen add-back have been shown to be protective of BMD, while on treatment and up to six and 12 months later, respectively. However, by 24 months of follow-up there was no difference in BMD in those women who had HRT add-back. Studies of danazol versus GnRHa did not report long-term follow-up. The significant side effects associated with danazol limit its use.

Raloxifene administration in women treated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist for uterine leiomyomas: effects on bone metabolism

This prospective randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial was performed to evaluate the efficacy of raloxifene in preventing the bone loss associated with GnRH agonist (GnRH-a) administration. One hundred premenopausal women with uterine leiomyomas were treated with leuprolide acetate depot at a dosage of 3.75 mg/d for 28 d and then randomized into two groups to receive raloxifene hydrochloride at 60 mg/d (group A) or placebo (1 tablet/d; group B). Bone mineral density (BMD) and serum bone metabolism markers were evaluated at admission and after six treatment cycles. Posttreatment BMD differed significantly from baseline BMD in group B but not in group A. BMD was significantly higher in group A than in group B. In group A, serum osteocalcin and bone alkaline phosphatase levels and urinary deoxypyridinoline and pyrilinks-D excretion were unchanged vs. baseline. Differently, posttreatment concentrations of these bone turnover markers were significantly lower in group B compared with baseline and group A values. In conclusion, raloxifene prevents GnRH-a related bone loss in premenopausal women with uterine leiomyomas.

Endometriosis: current concepts and therapy

Endometriosis is the growth of endometrial tissue in ectopic locations. The clinical picture is extremely pleiomorphic, which can make the diagnosis difficult. Despite 70 years of theories and experimentation, the cause is not clear, and it is likely that more than one mechanism is at work in most patients. Both medical and surgical treatments are available. In each case, the woman and her physician should formulate a comprehensive treatment plan that addresses the primary complaint as well as the patient's reproductive desires.

Bone metabolism in postmenopausal women who were treated with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and tibolone

OBJECTIVE

To study the bone metabolism in postmenopausal women who have been treated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) and tibolone.

DESIGN

Prospective, open, controlled clinical trial.

SETTING

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.

PATIENT(S)

One hundred twenty perimenopausal women with symptomatic uterine leiomyomas (groups A and B), and 40 healthy control women who underwent a normal spontaneous menopause (group C).

INTERVENTION(S)

Treatment for 12 months with leuprolide acetate plus tibolone (group A) or hysterectomy with bilateral oophorectomy (group B).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers at entry into the study, after medical treatment (only group A), and 12 months after discontinuation medical treatment (group A) or after surgery (group B). The same parameters were noted in healthy women before and 12 months after menopause (retrospective control group, group C).

RESULT(S)

At the women's entry into the study, no significant difference in BMD and bone turnover markers was detected between groups A and B. In group A, no significant variation in BMD or bone turnover markers was observed 12 months after medical treatment in comparison with baseline. At 12 months after discontinuation of treatment (in women who had achieved menopause) and after surgery, we observed a statistically significant decrease in BMD and in bone turnover markers in both groups in comparison with baseline. At 12 months after they became menopausal, we also observed a statistically significant reduction in BMD and in bone turnover markers in control group C. At the same 12-month follow-up visit, a statistically significant difference in BMD and in bone turnover markers was detected when comparing groups A and B with group C.

CONCLUSION(S)

Women previously treated with GnRH-a and tibolone similar to women who are menopausal as a result of surgery, have higher bone loss after menopause.