1
|
Veth VB, van de Kar MM, Duffy JM, van Wely M, Mijatovic V, Maas JW. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues for endometriosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2023; 6:CD014788. [PMID: 37341141 PMCID: PMC10283345 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd014788.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endometriosis is a common gynaecological condition affecting 6 to 11% of reproductive-age women and may cause dyspareunia, dysmenorrhoea, and infertility. One treatment strategy is medical therapy with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues (GnRHas) to reduce pain due to endometriosis. One of the adverse effects of GnRHas is a decreased bone mineral density. In addition to assessing the effect on pain, quality of life, most troublesome symptom and patients' satisfaction, the current review also evaluated the effect on bone mineral density and risk of adverse effects in women with endometriosis who use GnRHas versus other treatment options. OBJECTIVES To assess the effectiveness and safety of GnRH analogues (GnRHas) in the treatment of painful symptoms associated with endometriosis and to determine the effects of GnRHas on bone mineral density of women with endometriosis. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility (CGF) Group trials register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and the trial registries in May 2022 together with reference checking and contact with study authors and experts in the field to identify additional studies. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) which compared GnRHas with other hormonal treatment options, including analgesics, danazol, intra-uterine progestogens, oral or injectable progestogens, gestrinone and also GnRHas compared with no treatment or placebo. Trials comparing GnRHas versus GnRHas in conjunction with add-back therapy (hormonal or non-hormonal) or calcium-regulation agents were also included in this review. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methodology as recommended by Cochrane. Primary outcomes are relief of overall pain and the objective measurement of bone mineral density. Secondary outcomes include adverse effects, quality of life, improvement in the most troublesome symptoms and patient satisfaction. Due to high risk of bias associated with some of the studies, primary analyses of all review outcomes were restricted to studies at low risk of selection bias. Sensitivity analysis including all studies was then performed. MAIN RESULTS Seventy-two studies involving 7355 patients were included. The evidence was very low to low quality: the main limitations of all studies were serious risk of bias due to poor reporting of study methods, and serious imprecision. Trials comparing GnRHas versus no treatment We did not identify any studies. Trials comparing GnRHas versus placebo There may be a decrease in overall pain, reported as pelvic pain scores (RR 2.14; 95% CI 1.41 to 3.24, 1 RCT, n = 87, low-certainty evidence), dysmenorrhoea scores (RR 2.25; 95% CI 1.59 to 3.16, 1 RCT, n = 85, low-certainty evidence), dyspareunia scores (RR 2.21; 95% CI 1.39 to 3.54, 1 RCT, n = 59, low-certainty evidence), and pelvic tenderness scores (RR 2.28; 95% CI 1.48 to 3.50, 1 RCT, n = 85, low-certainty evidence) after three months of treatment. We are uncertain of the effect for pelvic induration, based on the results found after three months of treatment (RR 1.07; 95% CI 0.64 to 1.79, 1 RCT, n = 81, low-certainty evidence). Besides, treatment with GnRHas may be associated with a greater incidence of hot flushes at three months of treatment (RR 3.08; 95% CI 1.89 to 5.01, 1 RCT, n = 100, low-certainty evidence). Trials comparing GnRHas versus danazol For overall pain, for women treated with either GnRHas or danazol, a subdivision was made between pelvic tenderness, partly resolved and completely resolved. We are uncertain about the effect on relief of overall pain, when a subdivision was made for overall pain (MD -0.30; 95% CI -1.66 to 1.06, 1 RCT, n = 41, very low-certainty evidence), pelvic pain (MD 0.20; 95% CI -0.26 to 0.66, 1 RCT, n = 41, very low-certainty evidence), dysmenorrhoea (MD 0.10; 95% CI -0.49 to 0.69, 1 RCT, n = 41, very low-certainty evidence), dyspareunia (MD -0.20; 95% CI -0.77 to 0.37, 1 RCT, n = 41, very low-certainty evidence), pelvic induration (MD -0.10; 95% CI -0.59 to 0.39, 1 RCT, n = 41, very low-certainty evidence), and pelvic tenderness (MD -0.20; 95% CI -0.78 to 0.38, 1 RCT, n = 41, very low-certainty evidence) after three months of treatment. For pelvic pain (MD 0.50; 95% CI 0.10 to 0.90, 1 RCT, n = 41, very low-certainty evidence) and pelvic induration (MD 0.70; 95% CI 0.21 to 1.19, 1 RCT, n = 41, very low-certainty evidence), the complaints may decrease slightly after treatment with GnRHas, compared to danazol, for six months of treatment. Trials comparing GnRHas versus analgesics We did not identify any studies. Trials comparing GnRHas versus intra-uterine progestogens We did not identify any low risk of bias studies. Trials comparing GnRHas versus GnRHas in conjunction with calcium-regulating agents There may be a slight decrease in bone mineral density (BMD) after 12 months treatment with GnRHas, compared to GnRHas in conjunction with calcium-regulating agents for anterior-posterior spine (MD -7.00; 95% CI -7.53 to -6.47, 1 RCT, n = 41, very low-certainty evidence) and lateral spine (MD -12.40; 95% CI -13.31 to -11.49, 1 RCT, n = 41, very low-certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: For relief of overall pain, there may be a slight decrease in favour of treatment with GnRHas compared to placebo or oral or injectable progestogens. We are uncertain about the effect when comparing GnRHas with danazol, intra-uterine progestogens or gestrinone. For BMD, there may be a slight decrease when women are treated with GnRHas, compared to gestrinone. There was a bigger decrease of BMD in favour of GnRHas, compared to GnRHas in conjunction with calcium-regulating agents. However, there may be a slight increase in adverse effects when women are treated with GnRHas, compared to placebo or gestrinone. Due to a very low to low certainty of the evidence, a wide range of outcome measures and a wide range of outcome measurement instruments, the results should be interpreted with caution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veerle B Veth
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, Netherlands
| | | | - James Mn Duffy
- King's Fertility, The Fetal Medicine Research Institute, London, UK
| | - Madelon van Wely
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Velja Mijatovic
- Academic Endometriosis Center, Department of Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jacques Wm Maas
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chong KY, Solangon S, Barnhart K, Causa-Andrieu P, Capmas P, Condous G, de Waard L, Duffy JM, Horne AW, Memtsa M, Mol F, Oza M, Pesce R, Strandell A, van Wely M, Hooft JV', Vuong LN, Zhang J, Jurkovic D, Mol BW. A core outcome set for future research in ectopic pregnancy - an international consensus development study. Fertil Steril 2023; 119:804-812. [PMID: 36736812 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.01.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2022] [Revised: 01/26/2023] [Accepted: 01/26/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating ectopic pregnancy have different outcomes which are defined and measured in diverse ways, which limits their ability to inform evidence-based clinical practice. OBJECTIVE To address methodological deficiencies in published RCTs and systematic reviews, this study has developed a core outcome set to guide future research in ectopic pregnancy. DESIGN To identify potential outcomes, we performed a comprehensive literature review and interviews with individuals with lived experience in ectopic pregnancy. Potential core outcomes were then entered into a three-round Delphi survey. 154 participants from six continents, comprising healthcare professionals, researchers, and individuals with lived experience in ectopic pregnancy, completed all three rounds of the Delphi survey. Outcomes were prioritised at three consensus development meetings and recommendations were developed on how to report these outcomes where possible. SUBJECTS Healthcare professionals, researchers, and individuals with lived experience in ectopic pregnancy RESULTS: Six outcomes reached full consensus, including treatment success, resolution time, number of additional interventions, adverse events, mortality and severe morbidity, and treatment satisfaction. CONCLUSION The core outcome set with six outcomes for ectopic pregnancy will help standardise reporting of clinical trials, facilitate implementation of findings into clinical practice, and enhance patient centred care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krystle Y Chong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, Australia; Monash Women's, Monash Health, Clayton, Australia.
| | - Sarah Solangon
- Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Kurt Barnhart
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Division of Reproductive Endocrinology & Infertility, Penn Medicine/University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia PA, USA
| | - Pamela Causa-Andrieu
- Department of Radiology. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
| | - Perrine Capmas
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bicetre University Hospital, Paris Saclay University, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
| | - George Condous
- Acute Gynaecology, Early Pregnancy and Advanced Endosurgery Unit, Sydney Medical School Nepean, University of Sydney, Nepean Hospital, NSW, Australia
| | - Liesl de Waard
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - James Mn Duffy
- Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK; King's Fertility, Fetal Medicine Research Institute, London, UK
| | - Andrew W Horne
- MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH16 4TJ, UK
| | - Maria Memtsa
- Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Femke Mol
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Netherlands
| | | | - Romina Pesce
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Division of Reproductive Medicine. Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Annika Strandell
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Madelon van Wely
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Netherlands
| | - Janneke van 't Hooft
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lan N Vuong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Jian Zhang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, China
| | - Davor Jurkovic
- Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Ben W Mol
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, Australia; Monash Women's, Monash Health, Clayton, Australia; Aberdeen Centre for Women's Health Research, University of Aberdeen Aberdeen, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hirsch M, Tariq L, Duffy JM. Effect of Local Anesthetics on Postoperative Pain in Patients Undergoing Gynecologic Laparoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2021; 28:1689-1698. [PMID: 33991671 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2021.04.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2021] [Revised: 04/29/2021] [Accepted: 04/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Pain remains a common complication after gynecologic laparoscopy. Use of local anesthesia may be beneficial in reducing postoperative pain. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess whether local anesthetic decreases postoperative pain after laparoscopic gynecologic procedures. DATA SOURCES We searched Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Embase, and Medline from inception to November 2020 using Medical Subject Headings and free text combinations. METHODS OF TRIAL SELECTION We included randomized controlled trials of patients undergoing gynecologic laparoscopy receiving port site subcutaneous, subfascial, or intraperitoneal local anesthetic compared with placebo or no intervention. We included 20 trials (1861 participants) with size varying between 28 and 164 participants. TABULATIONS, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS Meta-analysis was performed with RevMan 5.3 (Cochrane Collaboration, London, United Kingdom), with standard mean differences (SMDs) and random-effects model. Port site infiltration reduces postoperative pain at 4 hours (SMD -0.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.44 to -0.06; 4 trials; 545 participants) and 6 hours (SMD -0.44; 95% CI, -0.82 to -0.06; 4 trials; 455 participants) after surgery. The administration of intraperitoneal local anesthetics reduces pain at 6 hours (-1.42; 95% CI, -3.22 to -0.30; 4 trials; 277 participants) after surgery. CONCLUSIONS The use of port site and intraperitoneal local anesthetic decreases immediate postoperative pain in patients undergoing gynecologic laparoscopy, although its impact on analgesia requirements is unclear. Routine usage of local anesthetics should be considered for people undergoing gynecologic laparoscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Hirsch
- EGA Institute for Women's Health (Dr. Hirsch), University College London; Oxford University Hospitals (Dr. Hirsch), Headley way, Oxford, United Kingdom.
| | - Laiba Tariq
- University College London Medical School (Ms. Tariq)
| | - James Mn Duffy
- King's Fertility (Dr. Duffy), Fetal Medicine Research Institute
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Illingworth BJ, Lewis DJ, Lambarth AT, Stocking K, Duffy JM, Jelen LA, Rucker JJ. A comparison of MDMA-assisted psychotherapy to non-assisted psychotherapy in treatment-resistant PTSD: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Psychopharmacol 2021; 35:501-511. [PMID: 33345689 DOI: 10.1177/0269881120965915] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE Novel, evidence-based treatments are required for treatment-resistant post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). 3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) has beneficially augmented psychotherapy in several small clinical trials. OBJECTIVE To review the use of MDMA-assisted psychotherapy in treatment-resistant PTSD. METHODS Systematic searches of four databases were conducted from inception to February 2020. A meta-analysis was performed on trials which were double-blinded, randomised, and compared MDMA-assisted psychotherapy to psychotherapy and placebo. The primary outcomes were the differences in Clinician Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS-IV) score and Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI). Secondary outcome measures included neurocognitive and physical adverse effects, at the time, and within 7 days of intervention. RESULTS Four randomised controlled trials (RCTs) met inclusion criteria. When compared to active placebo, intervention groups taking 75 mg (MD -46.90; 95% (confidence intervals) CI -58.78, -35.02), 125 mg (MD -20.98; 95% CI -34.35, -7.61) but not 100 mg (MD -12.90; 95% CI -36.09, 10.29) of MDMA with psychotherapy, had significant decreases in CAPS-IV scores, as did the inactive placebo arm (MD -33.20; 95% CI -40.53, -25.87). A significant decrease in BDI when compared to active placebo (MD -10.80; 95% CI -20.39, -1.21) was only observed at 75 mg. Compared to placebo, participants reported significantly more episodes of low mood, nausea and jaw-clenching during sessions and lack of appetite after 7 days. CONCLUSION These results demonstrate potential therapeutic benefit with minimal physical and neurocognitive risk for the use of MDMA-assisted psychotherapy in TR-PTSD, despite little effect on Beck's Depression Inventory. Better powered RCTs are required to investigate further. INTERNATIONAL PROSPECTIVE REGISTER OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS CRD42019109132 available online at www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Andrew T Lambarth
- North Middlesex Hospital, North Middlesex University Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Kate Stocking
- Centre for Biostatistics, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - James Mn Duffy
- Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK.,The Fetal Medicine Research Institute, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Luke A Jelen
- Centre for Affective Disorders, King's College London, London, UK
| | - James J Rucker
- Centre for Affective Disorders, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endometriosis is associated with pain and infertility. Surgical interventions aim to remove visible areas of endometriosis and restore the anatomy. OBJECTIVES To assess the effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of pain and infertility associated with endometriosis. SEARCH METHODS This review has drawn on the search strategy developed by the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group including searching the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group's specialised register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, reference lists for relevant trials, and trial registries from inception to April 2020. SELECTION CRITERIA We selected randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic surgery with any other laparoscopic or robotic intervention, holistic or medical treatment, or diagnostic laparoscopy only. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently performed selection of studies, assessment of trial quality and extraction of relevant data with disagreements resolved by a third review author. We collected data for the core outcome set for endometriosis. Primary outcomes included overall pain and live birth. We evaluated the quality of evidence using GRADE methods. MAIN RESULTS We included 14 RCTs. The studies randomised 1563 women with endometriosis. Four RCTs compared laparoscopic ablation or excision with diagnostic laparoscopy only. Two RCTs compared laparoscopic excision with diagnostic laparoscopy only. One RCT compared laparoscopic ablation or excision with laparoscopic ablation or excision and uterine suspension. Two RCTs compared laparoscopic ablation and uterine nerve transection with diagnostic laparoscopy only. One RCT compared laparoscopic ablation with diagnostic laparoscopy and gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues. Two RCTs compared laparoscopic ablation with laparoscopic excision. One RCT compared laparoscopic ablation or excision with helium thermal coagulator with laparoscopic ablation or excision with electrodiathermy. One RCT compared conservative laparoscopic surgery with laparoscopic colorectal resection of deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectum. Common limitations in the primary studies included lack of clearly described blinding, failure to fully describe methods of randomisation and allocation concealment, and poor reporting of outcome data. Laparoscopic treatment versus diagnostic laparoscopy We are uncertain of the effect of laparoscopic treatment on overall pain scores compared to diagnostic laparoscopy only at six months (mean difference (MD) 0.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.31 to 1.49; 1 RCT, 16 participants; very low quality evidence) and at 12 months (MD 1.65, 95% CI 1.11 to 2.19; 1 RCT, 16 participants; very low quality evidence), where a positive value means pain relief (the higher the score, the more pain relief) and a negative value reflects pain increase (the lower the score, the worse the increase in pain). No studies looked at live birth. We are uncertain of the effect of laparoscopic treatment on quality of life compared to diagnostic laparoscopy only: EuroQol-5D index summary at six months (MD 0.03, 95% CI -0.12 to 0.18; 1 RCT, 39 participants; low quality evidence), 12-item Short Form (SF-12) mental health component (MD 2.30, 95% CI -4.50 to 9.10; 1 RCT, 39 participants; low quality evidence) and SF-12 physical health component (MD 2.70, 95% CI -2.90 to 8.30; 1 RCT, 39 participants; low quality evidence). Laparoscopic treatment probably improves viable intrauterine pregnancy rate compared to diagnostic laparoscopy only (odds ratio (OR) 1.89, 95% CI 1.25 to 2.86; 3 RCTs, 528 participants; I2 = 0%; moderate quality evidence). We are uncertain of the effect of laparoscopic treatment compared to diagnostic laparoscopy only on ectopic pregnancy (MD 1.18, 95% CI 0.10 to 13.48; 1 RCT, 100 participants; low quality evidence) and miscarriage (MD 0.94, 95% CI 0.35 to 2.54; 2 RCTs, 112 participants; low quality evidence). There was limited reporting of adverse events. No conversions to laparotomy were reported in both groups (1 RCT, 341 participants). Laparoscopic ablation and uterine nerve transection versus diagnostic laparoscopy We are uncertain of the effect of laparoscopic ablation and uterine nerve transection on adverse events (more specifically vascular injury) compared to diagnostic laparoscopy only (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.01 to 8.32; 1 RCT, 141 participants; low quality evidence). No studies looked at overall pain scores (at six and 12 months), live birth, quality of life, viable intrauterine pregnancy confirmed by ultrasound, ectopic pregnancy and miscarriage. Laparoscopic ablation versus laparoscopic excision There was insufficient evidence to determine whether there was a difference in overall pain, measured at 12 months, for laparoscopic ablation compared with laparoscopic excision (MD 0.00, 95% CI -1.22 to 1.22; 1 RCT, 103 participants; very low quality evidence). No studies looked at overall pain scores at six months, live birth, quality of life, viable intrauterine pregnancy confirmed by ultrasound, ectopic pregnancy, miscarriage and adverse events. Helium thermal coagulator versus electrodiathermy We are uncertain whether helium thermal coagulator compared to electrodiathermy improves quality of life using the 30-item Endometriosis Health Profile (EHP-30) at nine months, when considering the components: pain (MD 6.68, 95% CI -3.07 to 16.43; 1 RCT, 119 participants; very low quality evidence), control and powerlessness (MD 4.79, 95% CI -6.92 to 16.50; 1 RCT, 119 participants; very low quality evidence), emotional well-being (MD 6.17, 95% CI -3.95 to 16.29; 1 RCT, 119 participants; very low quality evidence) and social support (MD 5.62, 95% CI -6.21 to 17.45; 1 RCT, 119 participants; very low quality evidence). Adverse events were not estimable. No studies looked at overall pain scores (at six and 12 months), live birth, viable intrauterine pregnancy confirmed by ultrasound, ectopic pregnancy and miscarriage. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Compared to diagnostic laparoscopy only, it is uncertain whether laparoscopic surgery reduces overall pain associated with minimal to severe endometriosis. No data were reported on live birth. There is moderate quality evidence that laparoscopic surgery increases viable intrauterine pregnancy rates confirmed by ultrasound compared to diagnostic laparoscopy only. No studies were found that looked at live birth for any of the comparisons. Further research is needed considering the management of different subtypes of endometriosis and comparing laparoscopic interventions with lifestyle and medical interventions. There was insufficient evidence on adverse events to allow any conclusions to be drawn regarding safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Celine Bafort
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Yusuf Beebeejaun
- King's Fertility, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Carla Tomassetti
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jan Bosteels
- Academic Centre for General Practice, Cochrane Belgium, Leuven, Belgium
| | - James Mn Duffy
- Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
- King's Fertility, Fetal Medicine Research Institute, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bofill Rodriguez M, Lethaby A, Farquhar C, Duffy JM. Interventions commonly available during pandemics for heavy menstrual bleeding: an overview of Cochrane Reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; 7:CD013651. [PMID: 32700364 PMCID: PMC7388826 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013651.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Within the context of heavy menstrual bleeding, pandemics impact upon women's assessment and treatment by healthcare providers. OBJECTIVES To summarise the evidence from Cochrane Reviews evaluating interventions for heavy menstrual bleeding that are commonly available during pandemics. METHODS We sought published Cochrane Reviews, evaluating interventions that can continue during pandemics for women with heavy menstrual bleeding with no known underlying cause. We identified Cochrane Reviews by searching the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews in June 2020. The primary outcome was menstrual bleeding. Secondary outcomes included quality of life, patient satisfaction, side effects, and serious adverse events. We undertook the selection of systematic reviews, data extraction, and quality assessment in duplicate. We resolved any disagreements by discussion. We assessed review quality using the Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) 2 tool, and the certainty of the evidence for each outcome using GRADE methods. MAIN RESULTS We included four Cochrane Reviews, with 11 comparisons, data from 44 randomised controlled trials (RCTs), and 3196 women. We assessed all the reviews to be high quality. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) NSAIDs may be more effective in reducing heavy menstrual bleeding than placebo (mean difference (MD) -124 mL per cycle, 95% confidence interval (CI) -186 to -62 mL per cycle; 1 RCT, 11 women; low-certainty evidence). Mefenamic acid may be similar to naproxen (MD 21 mL per cycle, 95% CI -6 to 48 mL per cycle; 2 RCTs, 61 women; low-certainty evidence), and NSAIDs may be similar to combined hormonal contraceptives for heavy menstrual bleeding (MD 25 mL per cycle, 95% CI -22 to 73 mL per cycle; 1 RCT, 26 women; low-certainty evidence). NSAIDs may be be less effective in reducing menstrual bleeding than antifibrinolytics (relative risk (RR) 0.70, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.85; 2 RCTs, 161 women; low-certainty evidence). We are uncertain whether NSAIDs reduce menstrual blood loss more than short-cycle progestogens (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.49 to 1.32; 1 RCT 32 women; very low-certainty evidence). Antifibrinolytics Antifibrinolytics appear to be more effective in reducing heavy menstrual bleeding than placebo (MD -53 mL per cycle, 95% CI -63 to -44 mL per cycle; 4 RCTs, 565 women; moderate-certainty evidence). Antifibrinolytics may be similar to placebo on the incidence of side effects (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.18; 1 RCT, 297 women; low-certainty evidence), and they are probably similar on the incidence of serious adverse events (thrombotic events; RR 0.10, 95% CI 0.00 to 2.46; 2 RCT, 468 women; moderate-certainty evidence). Antifibrinolytics may be more effective in reducing heavy menstrual bleeding than short-cycle progestogen (MD -111 mL per cycle, 95% CI -178 mL to -44 mL per cycle; 1 RCT, 46 women; low-certainty evidence). We are uncertain whether antifibrinolytics are similar to short-cycle progestogens on quality of life (RR 1.67, 95% CI 0.76 to 3.64; 1 RCT, 44 women; very low-certainty evidence), patient satisfaction (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.39; 1 RCT, 42 women; very low-certainty evidence), or side effects (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.12; 3 RCTs, 211 women; very low-certainty evidence). We are uncertain whether antifibrinolytics are more effective in reducing heavy menstrual bleeding when compared with long-cycle progestogen (MD -9 points per cycle, 95% CI -30 to 12 points per cycle; 2 RCTs, 184 women; low-certainty evidence). Antifibrinolytics may increase self-reported improvement in menstrual bleeding when compared with long-cycle medroxyprogesterone acetate (RR 1.32, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.61; 1 RCT, 94 women; low-certainty evidence). Antifibrinolytics may be similar to long-cycle progestogens on quality of life (MD 5, 95% CI -2.49 to 12.49; 1 RCT, 90 women; low-certainty evidence). We are uncertain whether antifibrinolytics are similar to long-cycle progestogens on side effects (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.33 to 1.00; 2 RCTs, 184 women; very low-certainty evidence). There were no trials comparing antifibrinolytics to combined hormonal contraceptives. Combined hormonal contraceptives Combined hormonal contraceptives appear to be more effective for heavy menstrual bleeding than placebo or no treatment (RR 13.25, 95% CI 2.94 to 59.64; 2 RCTs, 363 women; moderate-certainty evidence). Combined hormonal contraceptives are probably similar to placebo on the incidence of side effects (RR 1.53, 95% CI 0.90 to 2.60; 2 RCTs, 411 women; moderate-certainty evidence). Progestogens There were no trials comparing progestogens to placebo. Limitations in the evidence included risk of bias in the primary RCTs, inconsistency between the primary RCTs, and imprecision in effect estimates. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS There is moderate-certainty evidence that antifibrinolytics and combined hormonal contraceptives reduce heavy menstrual bleeding compared with placebo. There is low-certainty evidence that NSAIDs reduce heavy menstrual bleeding compared with placebo. There is low-certainty evidence that antifibrinolytics are more effective in reducing heavy menstrual bleeding when compared with NSAIDs and short-cycle progestogens, but we are unable to draw conclusions about the effects of antifibrinolytics compared to long-cycle progestogens, on low-certainty evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anne Lethaby
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Cindy Farquhar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - James Mn Duffy
- King's Fertility, Fetal Medicine Research Institute, London, UK
- Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Duffy JM, Kirk E, Illingworth BJ, Stocking K, Showell M. Authors' reply re: Evaluation of treatments for Bartholin's cyst or abscess: a systematic review. BJOG 2020; 127:1306. [PMID: 32662204 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- James Mn Duffy
- Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK.,King's Fertility, Fetal Medicine Research Foundation, London, UK
| | - Emma Kirk
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Free London NHS Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Katie Stocking
- Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, Centre for Biostatistics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Marian Showell
- Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Webbe J, Brunton G, Ali S, Duffy JM, Modi N, Gale C. Developing, implementing and disseminating a core outcome set for neonatal medicine. BMJ Paediatr Open 2017; 1:e000048. [PMID: 29637104 PMCID: PMC5862188 DOI: 10.1136/bmjpo-2017-000048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2017] [Revised: 06/07/2017] [Accepted: 06/09/2017] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In high resource settings, 1 in 10 newborn babies require admission to a neonatal unit. Research evaluating neonatal care involves recording and reporting many different outcomes and outcome measures. Such variation limits the usefulness of research as studies cannot be compared or combined. To address these limitations, we aim to develop, disseminate and implement a core outcome set for neonatal medicine. METHODS A steering group that includes parents and former patients, healthcare professionals and researchers has been formed to guide the development of the core outcome set. We will review neonatal trials systematically to identify previously reported outcomes. Additionally, we will specifically identify outcomes of importance to parents, former patients and healthcare professionals through a systematic review of qualitative studies. Outcomes identified will be entered into an international, multi-perspective eDelphi survey. All key stakeholders will be invited to participate. The Delphi method will encourage individual and group stakeholder consensus to identify a core outcome set. The core outcome set will be mapped to existing, routinely recorded data where these exist. DISCUSSION Use of a core set will ensure outcomes of importance to key stakeholders, including former patients and parents, are recorded and reported in a standard fashion in future research. Embedding the core outcome set within future clinical studies will extend the usefulness of research to inform practice, enhance patient care and ultimately improve outcomes. Using routinely recorded electronic data will facilitate implementation with minimal addition burden. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) database: 842 (www.comet-initiative.org/studies/details/842).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Webbe
- Section of Neonatal Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Ginny Brunton
- Institute of Education, University College London, London, UK
| | - Shohaib Ali
- School of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - James Mn Duffy
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Neena Modi
- Section of Neonatal Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Chris Gale
- Section of Neonatal Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
The indirect exchange interaction is one of the key factors in determining the overall alignment of magnetic impurities embedded in metallic host materials. In this work we examine the range of this interaction in magnetically doped graphene systems in the presence of armchair edges using a combination of analytical and numerical Green function approaches. We consider both a semi-infinite sheet of graphene with a single armchair edge, and also quasi-one-dimensional armchair-edged graphene nanoribbons (GNRs). While we find signals of the bulk decay rate in semi-infinite graphene and signals of the expected one-dimensional decay rate in GNRs, we also find an unusually rapid decay for certain instances in both, which manifests itself whenever the impurities are located at sites which are a multiple of three atoms from the edge. This decay behavior emerges from both the analytic and numerical calculations, and the result for semi-infinite graphene can be interpreted as an intermediate case between ribbon and bulk systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J M Duffy
- School of Physics, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hysteroscopy is increasingly performed in an outpatient setting. The primary reason for failure is pain. There is no consensus upon the routine use of analgesia during hysteroscopy. OBJECTIVES The aim of the study was to compare the effectiveness of different types of pharmacological interventions for pain relief in patients undergoing hysteroscopy. SEARCH STRATEGY A search of medical literature databases including PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO and CINHAL (to February 2010). SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) investigating pharmacological interventions for pain relief during hysteroscopy were investigated. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Results for each study were expressed as a standardised mean difference with 95% confidence interval and combined for meta-analysis with Revman 5 software. MAIN RESULTS Twenty-four RCTS were identified involving a total of 3155 participants, with 15 studies included in the meta-analysis.Meta-analysis (nine RCTs, 1296 participants) revealed a significant reduction in the mean pain score for the use of local anaesthetics during the procedure compared with placebo (SMD -0.45, 95% CI -0.73 to -0.17, I(2) = 82%).Meta-analysis (4 RCTs, 454 participants) demonstrated a significant reduction in the mean pain score for the use of local anaesthetics within 30 minutes after the procedure compared with placebo (SMD -0.51, 95% CI -0.81 to -0.21, I(2) = 54%).There was no significant reduction in the mean pain score with the use of NSAIDS or opioid analgesics compared with placebo during or within 30 minutes after the procedure.There was no significant reduction in the mean pain score with the use of local anaesthetics, NSAIDS or opioid analgesics compared with placebo more than 30 minutes after the procedure.There was no significant difference between the number of incidents of failure to complete the procedure due to cervical stenosis between the intervention and control groups (OR 1.31, 95% CI 0.66 to 2.59; 6 RCTs, 805 participants).There were significantly fewer incidents of failure to complete the procedure due to pain in the intervention group than in the control group (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.69; two studies, 330 participants).Meta-analysis demonstrated no significant difference between the intervention and placebo groups with regards to adverse effects. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS There was a significant reduction in the mean pain score with the use of analgesia during and within 30 minutes after outpatient hysteroscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaity Ahmad
- Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Pennine Acute NHS Trust, Manchester, UK
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endometriosis is the presence of endometrial glands or stroma in sites other than the uterine cavity. It is variable in both its surgical appearance and clinical manifestation, often with poor correlation between the two. Surgical treatment of endometriosis aims to remove visible areas of endometriosis and restore anatomy by the division of adhesions. OBJECTIVES To assess the efficacy of laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of subfertility associated with endometriosis. The review aims to compare outcomes of laparoscopic surgical interventions compared to no treatment or medical treatment with regard to improved fertility. SEARCH STRATEGY We searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group Specialised Register of trials (June 2009), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library 2009, Issue 2), MEDLINE (1966 to June 2009), EMBASE (1980 to June 2009), and reference lists of articles. SELECTION CRITERIA Trials were selected if they were randomised and compared the effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of subfertility associated with endometriosis versus other treatment modalities or placebo. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two studies were eligible for inclusion within the review. Both studies compared laparoscopic surgical treatment of minimal and mild endometriosis compared with diagnostic laparoscopy only. The recorded outcomes included live birth, pregnancy, fetal losses, and complications of surgery. MAIN RESULTS When combining live birth rate and ongoing pregnancy after 20 weeks, meta-analysis demonstrated an advantage of laparoscopic surgery when compared to diagnostic laparoscopy only. The odds ratio (OR) was 1.64 (95% confidence interval (Cl) 1.05 to 2.57) in favour of laparoscopic surgery. Meta-analysis also demonstrated an advantage of laparoscopic surgery when compared to diagnostic laparoscopy only in terms of clinical pregnancy rates, with an OR of 1.66 (95% Cl 1.09 to 2.51) favouring laparoscopic surgery. The results still need to be interpreted with caution as Marcoux 1997 reported a large positive effect of surgery whereas Gruppo Italiano reported a small negative effect. When considering fetal losses, meta-analysis did not demonstrate an effect of laparoscopic surgery when compared to diagnostic laparoscopy only. The OR was 1.33 (95% Cl 0.60 to 2.94) favouring diagnostic laparoscopy only. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The use of laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of subfertility related to minimal and mild endometriosis may improve future fertility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tal Z Jacobson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, South Auckland Clinical School, Middlemore Hospital, Private Bag 93311, Auckland, New Zealand
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND In an effort to improve outcomes of in-vitro fertilisation cycles the use of growth hormone has been considered. Improving the outcomes of in-vitro fertilisation is especially important for subfertile women who are considered 'poor responders'. OBJECTIVES To assess the effectiveness of adjuvant growth hormone in in-vitro fertilisation protocols. SEARCH STRATEGY We searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Groups trials register (June 2009), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2009), MEDLINE (1966 to June 2009), EMBASE (1988 to June 2009) and Biological Abstracts (1969 to June 2009). SELECTION CRITERIA All randomised controlled trials were included if they addressed the research question and provided outcome data for intervention and control participants. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Assessment of trial risk of bias and extraction of relevant data was performed independently by two reviewers. MAIN RESULTS Ten studies (440 subfertile couples) were included. Results of the meta-analysis demonstrated no difference in outcome measures and adverse events in the routine use of adjuvant growth hormone in in-vitro fertilisation protocols. However, meta-analysis demonstrated a statistically significant difference in both live birth rates and pregnancy rates favouring the use of adjuvant growth hormone in in-vitro fertilisation protocols in women who are considered poor responders without increasing adverse events, OR 5.39, 95% CI 1.89 to 15.35 and OR 3.28, 95% CI 1.74 to 6.20 respectively. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Although the use of growth hormone in poor responders has been found to show a significant improvement in live birth rates, we were unable to identify which sub-group of poor responders would benefit the most from adjuvant growth hormone. The result needs to be interpreted with caution, the included trials were few in number and small sample size. Therefore, before recommending growth hormone adjuvant in in-vitro fertilisation further research is necessary to fully define its role.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaity Ahmad
- Obstetric & Gynaecology, Stepping Hill Hospital, 30 Badger Road, Altrincham, Cheshire, UK, WA14 5UZ
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
The association of aphasia, apraxia and agnosia with cortical but not subcortical dementias, is a widely held belief. The purpose of the present study was to determine the frequency of aphasia, apraxia, and agnosia in groups of cortical and subcortical dementia patients, and to assess the diagnostic utility of these symptoms. Subjects were 64 patients with subcortical dementias (Parkinson's disease and normal pressure hydrocephalus) and 192 patients with cortical dementia (probable Alzheimer's disease) matched for sex, age, and Mini-Mental State Examination score. Each patient was evaluated for the presence of aphasia, apraxia, and agnosia. Results indicated that only aphasia was reported significantly more often in cortical dementia patients than in subcortical dementia patients. The presence of either of these three symptoms has very low diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and total predictive value. The severity of the patient's dementia was predicted whether the patient had aphasia or apraxia; type of dementia had no predictive value. These data led to the conclusion that cortical and subcortical dementias cannot be reliably dissociated on the basis of aphasia, apraxia, or agnosia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J H Kramer
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco 94143, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Duffy JM, Walker B, Guthrie D, Grimshaw J, McNally G, Grimshaw JT, Spedding PL, Mollan RA. The detection, quantification and partial characterisation of cathepsin B-like activity in human pathological synovial fluids. Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 1994; 32:429-34. [PMID: 7918840 DOI: 10.1515/cclm.1994.32.6.429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
In this study, the levels of the cysteine proteinase--cathepsin B were measured in diseased synovial fluids using a steady state fluorometric assay. Cathepsin B-like activity was shown to be present in all the samples analysed, with the rheumatoid arthritic synovial fluids possessing significantly higher concentrations (mean value ca. 416 mg/l) than the osteoarthritic fluids (mean value ca. 142.4 mg/l). In addition, upon treatment with pepsin, all of the rheumatoid arthritis samples were shown to possess additional cathepsin B-like activity, suggesting the presence of a reservoir of latent precursor molecules. By utilising a recently developed biotinylated affinity label for cathepsin B-like proteinases and sheep anti-(human cathepsin B) antibodies, used in combination with SDS-PAGE and Western blotting, the rheumatoid arthritic synovial cathepsin B was shown to exist in two forms with apparent molecular masses of M(r) 29,000 and 42,000. We propose that the former is a functionally active proteinase, whereas the latter is a pepsin activatable proform which, when cleaved by this aspartyl proteinase, is converted into a catalytically competent species of M(r) 20,000.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J M Duffy
- Queen's University of Belfast, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Musgrave Park Hospital, Northern Ireland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Duffy JM, Grimshaw J, Guthrie DJ, McNally GM, Mollan RA, Spedding PL, Trocha-Grimshaw J, Walker B, Walsh E. 1H-nuclear magnetic resonance studies of human synovial fluid in arthritic disease states as an aid to confirming metabolic activity in the synovial cavity. Clin Sci (Lond) 1993; 85:343-51. [PMID: 8403807 DOI: 10.1042/cs0850343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
1. A 1H-n.m.r. method was used to measure concentrations of valine, alanine, lactate, acetate, hyaluronan and lipids in synovial fluid obtained, during the normal course of examination from the knee joints of patients attending rheumatology and orthopaedic clinics. Fluid was available from 16 patients with osteoarthritis, 18 patients with rheumatoid arthritis, four patients with meniscal tear and one patient each with systemic lupus erythematosis, mono-arthritis, synovitis and loose bodies. Four normal specimens were obtained for comparison. 2. Valine, alanine and acetate levels all showed a normal Gaussian distribution, reflecting the distributions within the serum of the sample population. 3. Lactate concentrations divided into two distinct patterns. At concentrations below 2.5 mmol/l the lactate levels showed a Gaussian distribution, reflecting the distribution in normal serum. The normal synovial fluid specimens belong to this distribution. Above 2.5-3.0 mmol/l, lactate levels were asymmetric in distribution with a long tail at higher concentrations. These high levels of lactate can be explained by the generation of lactate through anaerobic metabolism within the synovial cavity. This metabolic process is triggered by a general inflammatory condition such as in rheumatoid arthritis. 4. The distribution of n.m.r.-observable lipid concentrations in rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis each shows a normal distribution and the mean concentration is significantly higher in rheumatoid arthritis. 5. An increased n.m.r.-observable hyaluronan concentration is associated with an inflammatory situation. 6. It is concluded that raised levels of lactate and n.m.r.-observable hyaluronan and lipids are useful markers to aid the clinical distinction between rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J M Duffy
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Musgrave Park Hospital, Belfast, U.K
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Mollan RA, Ross KA, Duffy JM. Farmer's hip. BMJ 1992; 305:119. [PMID: 1638243 PMCID: PMC1882596 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.305.6845.119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
|