Oral contraceptives in diabetic women: metabolic effects of four compounds with different estrogen/progestogen profiles

U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 2024

The 2024 U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use (U.S. MEC) comprises recommendations for the use of specific contraceptive methods by persons who have certain characteristics or medical conditions. These recommendations for health care providers were updated by CDC after review of the scientific evidence and a meeting with national experts in Atlanta, Georgia, during January 25-27, 2023. The information in this report replaces the 2016 U.S. MEC (CDC. U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 2016. MMWR 2016:65[No. RR-3]:1-103). Notable updates include 1) the addition of recommendations for persons with chronic kidney disease; 2) revisions to the recommendations for persons with certain characteristics or medical conditions (i.e., breastfeeding, postpartum, postabortion, obesity, surgery, deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism with or without anticoagulant therapy, thrombophilia, superficial venous thrombosis, valvular heart disease, peripartum cardiomyopathy, systemic lupus erythematosus, high risk for HIV infection, cirrhosis, liver tumor, sickle cell disease, solid organ transplantation, and drug interactions with antiretrovirals used for prevention or treatment of HIV infection); and 3) inclusion of new contraceptive methods, including new doses or formulations of combined oral contraceptives, contraceptive patches, vaginal rings, progestin-only pills, levonorgestrel intrauterine devices, and vaginal pH modulator. The recommendations in this report are intended to serve as a source of evidence-based clinical practice guidance for health care providers. The goals of these recommendations are to remove unnecessary medical barriers to accessing and using contraception and to support the provision of person-centered contraceptive counseling and services in a noncoercive manner. Health care providers should always consider the individual clinical circumstances of each person seeking contraceptive services. This report is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice for individual patients; when needed, patients should seek advice from their health care providers about contraceptive use.

Effects of oral contraceptives on metabolic parameters in adult premenopausal women: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the effect of oral contraceptives (OC) containing different progestins on parameters of lipid and carbohydrate metabolism through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Premenopausal women aged 18 or older, who received oral contraceptives containing chlormadinone, cyproterone, drospirenone, levonorgestrel, desogestrel, dienogest, gestodene or norgestimate, for at least 3 months. Outcome variables were changes in plasma lipids, BMI, insulin resistance and plasma glucose. We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for randomized trials and estimated the pooled within-group change in each outcome variable using a random-effects model. We performed subgroup analyses by study duration (<12 months vs ≥12 months) and polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) status.

RESULTS

Eighty-two clinical trials fulfilled the inclusion criteria. All progestins (except dienogest) increased plasma TG, ranging from 12.1 mg/dL for levonorgestrel (P < 0.001) to 35.1 mg/dL for chlormadinone (P < 0.001). Most progestins also increased HDLc, with the largest effect observed for chlormadinone (+9.6 mg/dL, P < 0.001) and drospirenone (+7.4 mg/dL, P < 0.001). Meanwhile, levonorgestrel decreased HDLc by 4.4 mg/dL (P < 0.001). Levonorgestrel (+6.8 mg/dL, P < 0.001) and norgestimate (+11.5 mg/dL, P = 0.003) increased LDLc, while dienogest decreased it (-7.7 mg/dL, P = 0.04). Cyproterone slightly reduced plasma glucose. None of the progestins affected BMI or HOMA-IR. Similar results were observed in subgroups defined by PCOS or study duration.

CONCLUSION

Most progestins increase both TG and HDLc, their effect on LDLc varies widely. OC have minor or no effects on BMI, HOMA-IR and glycemia. The antiandrogen progestins dienogest and cyproterone displayed the most favorable metabolic profile, while levonorgestrel displayed the least favorable.

Hormonal versus non-hormonal contraceptives in women with diabetes mellitus type 1 and 2

BACKGROUND

Adequate contraceptive advice is important in both women with diabetes mellitus type 1 and type 2 to reduce the risk of maternal and infant morbidity and mortality in unplanned pregnancies. A wide variety of contraceptives are available for these women. However, hormonal contraceptives might influence carbohydrate and lipid metabolism and increase micro- and macrovascular complications, so caution in selecting a contraceptive method is required.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate whether progestogen-only, combined estrogen and progestogen or non-hormonal contraceptives differ in terms of effectiveness in preventing pregnancy, in their side effects on carbohydrate and lipid metabolism, and in long-term complications such as micro- and macrovascular disease when used in women with diabetes mellitus.

SEARCH METHODS

The search was performed in CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, POPLINE, CINAHL, WorldCat, ECO, ArticleFirst, the Science Citation Index, the British Library Inside, and reference lists of relevant articles. The last search was performed in January 2013. In addition, experts in the field and pharmaceutical companies marketing contraceptives were contacted to identify published, unpublished or ongoing studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials that studied women with diabetes mellitus comparing: 1. hormonal versus non-hormonal contraceptives; 2. progestogen-only versus estrogen and progestogen contraceptives; 3. contraceptives containing < 50 µg estrogen versus contraceptives containing ≥ 50 µg estrogen; and 4. contraceptives containing first-, second- and third-generation progestogens, drospirenone and cyproterone acetate. The principal outcomes were contraceptive effectiveness, diabetes control, lipid metabolism and micro- and macrovascular complications.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two investigators evaluated the titles and abstracts identified from the literature search. Quality assessment was performed independently with discrepancies resolved by discussion or consulting a third review author. Because the trials differed in studied contraceptives, participant characteristics and methodological quality, we could not combine the data in a meta-analysis. The trials were therefore examined on an individual basis and narrative summaries were provided.

MAIN RESULTS

Four randomised controlled trials were included. No unintended pregnancies were reported during the study periods. Only one trial was of good methodological quality. It compared the influence of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (IUD) versus a copper IUD on carbohydrate metabolism in women with type 1 diabetes mellitus. No significant difference was found between the two groups. The other three trials were of limited methodological quality. Two compared progestogen-only pills with different estrogen and progestogen combinations, and one also included the levonorgestrel-releasing IUD and copper IUD. The trials reported that blood glucose levels remained stable during treatment with most regimens. Only high-dose combined oral contraceptives and 30 µg ethinylestradiol + 75 µg gestodene were identified as slightly impairing glucose homeostasis. The three studies found conflicting results regarding lipid metabolism. Some combined oral contraceptives appeared to have a minor adverse effect while others appeared to slightly improve lipid metabolism. The copper IUD and progestogen-only oral contraceptives also slightly improved lipid metabolism and no influence was seen while using the levonorgestel-releasing IUD. Only one study reported on micro- and macrovascular complications. It observed no signs or symptoms of thromboembolic incidents or visual disturbances, however study duration was short. Only minor adverse effects were reported in two studies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The four included randomised controlled trials in this systematic review provided insufficient evidence to assess whether progestogen-only and combined contraceptives differ from non-hormonal contraceptives in diabetes control, lipid metabolism and complications. Three of the four studies were of limited methodological quality, sponsored by pharmaceutical companies and described surrogate outcomes. Ideally, an adequately reported, high-quality randomised controlled trial analysing both intermediate outcomes (that is glucose and lipid metabolism) and true clinical endpoints (micro- and macrovascular disease) in users of combined, progestogen-only and non-hormonal contraceptives should be conducted. However, due to the low incidence of micro- and macrovascular disease and accordingly the large sample size and long follow-up period needed to observe differences in risk, a randomised controlled trial might not be the ideal design.

Contraception, and pregnancy in adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a review

Adolescence is a critical period for girls with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D). Reproductive issues, such as menstrual abnormalities, risk of an unplanned pregnancy, and contraception, should be addressed during this phase of life. This paper reviews several reproductive issues that are important in the care of adolescents, including pubertal development, menstrual abnormalities, ovulatory function, reproductive problems, the effects of hyperglycemia, contraception, and treatment of an unplanned pregnancy. A review of the literature was conducted. A MEDLINE search January 1966 to March 2011 was performed using the following MESH terms: puberty, menarche, ovary, polycystic ovary syndrome, menstruation, contraception, contraception-barrier, contraceptives-oral-hormonal, sex education, family planning services, and pregnancy in adolescence. This literature search was cross-referenced with an additional search on diabetes mellitus-type 1, diabetes complications, and pregnancy in diabetes. All published studies were searched regardless of the language of origin. Bibliographies were reviewed to extract additional relevant sources.

Hormonal Contraception and Diabetes

Women with gestational diabetes mellitus are at increased risk for developing diabetes mellitus (DM), mainly type 2 DM, as well as metabolic syndrome. The presence of subsequent pregnancies increases the risk. In addition, pregnancy in patients with type 1 and type 2 DM also elevates the risk of morbidity and mortality for both mothers and offspring. Thus, all women with pre-existing type 1 or type 2 DM should receive preconception care to optimize glycemic control (HbA1c ≤ 6%). In those cases with macrovascular or microvascular complications, family planning is even more important in order to avoid the risk of aggravation of such complications associated with a new pregnancy. The present review analyzes the metabolic and cardiovascular repercussions of hormone contraception in non-diabetic women as well as in type 1 and type 2 DM patients with and without macrovascular and microvascular complications. Finally, the recommendations pertaining to hormonal contraceptive methods for women with diabetes are summarized.

Estrogen-free oral hormonal contraception: benefits of the progestin-only pill

Although combined oral contraceptives (COCs) are commonly used and highly effective in preventing pregnancy, they may not be suitable for some women. COC use is associated with increased rates of cardiovascular events and is not recommended in nonbreastfeeding women in the immediate postpartum period or in breastfeeding women during the initial 6 months of breastfeeding. Moreover, estrogen-related adverse effects, such as headache, are common. Estrogen-free progestin-only pills (POPs) are a valuable option in women who prefer to take an oral hormonal contraceptive, but are ineligible for, or choose not to use, COCs. Although some POPs have been associated with lower contraceptive effectiveness than COCs, the POP containing desogestrel has shown similar contraceptive effectiveness to COCs. The most commonly reported complaints in women using all POPs are bleeding problems. Counseling women interested in using POPs about the variable bleeding patterns associated with this method may improve compliance and acceptance.

Contraception for Women with Chronic Medical Conditions

Chronic medical conditions can complicate maternal and fetal health during pregnancy, making unintended or mistimed pregnancy problematic. The use of highly effective reversible contraceptives is important for women with health issues, yet sometimes those same illnesses make the contraceptives themselves less effective or less safe. We review the evidence surrounding contraceptive use by women with six common medical conditions: systemic lupus erythematosus, diabetes mellitus, anticonvulsant use for epilepsy or mood disorder, HIV infection, migraine headache, and obesity. In some instances it is not possible to make a risk-free contraceptive choice, yet pregnancy may be even riskier. Good clinical judgment and patient counseling must be exercised.

Hormonal versus non-hormonal contraceptives in women with diabetes mellitus type 1 and 2

BACKGROUND

Adequate contraceptive advice is important in women with diabetes mellitus type 1 and 2 to reduce the risk of maternal and infant morbidity and mortality in unplanned pregnancies. A wide variety of contraceptives are available for these women. However hormonal contraceptives might influence carbohydrate and lipid metabolism and increase micro- and macrovascular complications. So caution in selecting a contraceptive method is required.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate whether progestogen-only, combined estrogen/progestogen or non-hormonal contraceptives differ in terms of effectiveness in preventing pregnancy, in their side effects on carbohydrate and lipid metabolism and in long-term complications such as micro- and macrovascular disease, when used in women with diabetes mellitus.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The search was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL/CCTR, POPLINE, CINAHL, WorldCat, ECO, ArticleFirst, the Science Citation Index, the British Library Inside, and reference lists of relevant articles. Last search was performed in May 2005. In addition, experts in the field and pharmaceutical companies marketing contraceptives were contacted to identify published, unpublished or ongoing studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials that studied women with diabetes mellitus comparing: 1. hormonal versus non-hormonal contraceptives. 2. progestogen-only versus estrogen/progestogen contraceptives. 3. contraceptives containing <50 microg estrogen versus contraceptives containing > or = 50 microg estrogen. 4. contraceptives containing 'first'-, 'second'- and 'third'-generation progestogens, drospirenone and cyproterone acetate. Principal outcomes were contraceptive effectiveness, diabetes control, lipid metabolism and micro- and macrovascular complications.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two investigators evaluated the titles and abstracts from the literature search. Quality assessment was performed independently with discrepancies resolved by discussion or consulting a third reviewer. Because the trials differed in studied contraceptives, participant characteristics and methodological quality, we could not combine the data in a meta-analysis. The trials were therefore examined on an individual basis and narrative summaries were provided.

MAIN RESULTS

Three randomised controlled trials were included. Only one was of good methodological quality. It compared the influence of levonorgestrel-releasing IUD versus copper-IUD on carbohydrate metabolism in women with type 1 diabetes mellitus. No difference was found in daily insulin requirement, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) or fasting blood sugar after twelve months. The other two trials were of limited methodological quality. Both compared progestogen-only pills with different estrogen/progestogen combinations. The trials reported blood glucose levels to remain stable during treatment with most regimens. Only high-dose combined oral contraceptives were found to slightly impair glucose homeostasis. Combined oral contraceptives also appeared to have a minor adverse effect on lipid metabolism whereas progestogen-only contraceptives slightly improved lipid-metabolism. Only one study reported on micro- and macrovascular complications. No signs or symptoms of thromboembolic incidents or visual disturbances were observed. However study duration was short. Minor adverse effects were reported in one study. The trial found progestogen-only pills to cause more bleeding irregularities when compared with combined oral contraceptives. Unintended pregnancies were not observed during any of the studies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The three included randomised controlled trials in this systematic review provided insufficient evidence to assess whether progestogen-only and combined contraceptives differ from non-hormonal contraceptives in diabetes control, lipid metabolism and complications. Two of the three studies were of limited methodological quality, sponsored by pharmaceutical companies and described surrogate outcomes. Ideally, an adequately reported, high-quality randomised controlled trial analysing both intermediate outcomes (i.e. glucose and lipid metabolism) and true clinical endpoints (micro- and macrovascular disease) in users of combined, progestogen-only and non-hormonal contraceptives should be conducted. However, due to the low incidence of micro- and macrovascular disease and accordingly the large sample size and follow-up period needed to observe differences in risk, a randomised controlled trial might not be the ideal design.

Which contraceptive methods are recommended for young women with type 1 diabetes mellitus? A survey among gynaecologists in Greece

BACKGROUND

Type 1 diabetes mellitus is common in Europeans. Optimal glucometabolic control at conception and during early pregnancy is necessary to reduce the risk of early miscarriage and congenital malformations. Safe and effective contraceptive methods are essential for these women in order to have a "planned pregnancy" under optimal conditions.

AIM

To find out which recommendations Greek gynaecologists give to young patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus with respect to contraception. To regard the experience of Greek gynaecologists in counselling with women. To compare the Greek gynaecologists with German gynaecologists in a previously published similar survey.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

A structured questionnaire containing questions about attitude, health care and contraception in young women with type 1 diabetes was given to 400 Greek gynaecologists working in Athens.

RESULTS

Only 70 (17.5%) of the Greek gynaecologists returned the questionnaire. Condoms were the preferred recommendation as contraceptive method for young women with diabetes mellitus type 1 in 64%. About 57% of the gynaecologists recommended this type of contraception as first line contraceptives for young women with diabetes type 1 who smoke. The two most important criteria for selection of a contraceptive method for Greek gynaecologists were the safety and the diabetes specific problems. The Greek gynaecologists had only limited experience in regard to counselling and treating young and adolescent women with type 1 diabetes.

CONCLUSION

There was no consensus with respect to contraception among Greek gynaecologists. This is similar to our previous findings in a survey involving German gynaecologists. Practical experience in counselling and treating adolescent and young women with type 1 diabetes was limited among the gynaecologists who participated in this study. Working out proper recommendations for contraception crucial for optimal medical care for type 1 diabetic women in Europe.

Effect of oral contraceptive steroid hormones on metabolic parameters of streptozotocin-induced diabetic rat

This study examined the effect of 0.05 mg norgestrel + 0.01 ethinyl estradiol (NEE) Kg x body wt(-1) on body weight, random blood glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin, and plasma insulin levels in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Weight loss, blood glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin, and plasma insulin values of rats treated with NEE before and after the onset of diabetes were not significantly different from that of untreated diabetic rats. In conclusion, oral administration of these contraceptive steroid hormones does not significantly alter the metabolic parameters of diabetic rats.

Contraception in diabetic women: comparative metabolic study of Norplant, depot medroxyprogesterone acetate, low dose oral contraceptive pill and CuT380A

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the long-term intake of Norplant, depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) and low dose oral contraceptive pill (OCs) on glycemic control, lipoprotein metabolism and coagulation profile in diabetic women.

METHODS

Prospective comparative study including 80 uncomplicated controlled diabetic women. Twenty women allocated to each group. Clinical, metabolic and coagulation status were followed up at 3, 6 and 9 months' visits.

RESULTS

Fasting blood sugar increased in OCs and DMPA users. Total cholesterol (TC) and LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) decreased in all groups except DMPA where it increased. Triglyceride (TG) only increased in OCs group. HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C) increased with OCs and decreased with Norplant and DMPA. Compared to IUD users, significantly higher percentage TG and HDL-C and lower LDL-C were observed in OCs users, while DMPA users had significantly higher TC and LDL-C and lower HDL-C. Partial thromboplastin time was prolonged in Norplant users.

CONCLUSION

In diabetics, Norplant results in minimal metabolic alterations followed by OCs while DMPA has unfavorable outcome.

The mythology of hormone replacement therapy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the literature on contraindications contained in pharmaceutical data sheets of five currently available oestrogen replacement preparations (HRT). These contraindications include cardiovascular disease, diabetes, liver diseases, otosclerosis, endometriosis, melanoma and hormone-dependent tumours.

DESIGN

Systematic review.

INTERVENTIONS

Oestrogen replacement regimens.

RESULTS

The contraindications to the five HRT preparations have been taken uncritically from the data sheets of oral contraceptives. In some of these conditions not only is HRT not contraindicated, it is indicated. The data sheets for the HRT preparations all state that cardiovascular disease is a contraindication, but systematic review shows that ischaemic heart disease, hypertension and hyperlipidaemia are not contraindications, and in ischaemic heart disease HRT may actually be indicated. Similarly, systematic review shows that diabetes, chronic liver disease, endometriosis, some cases of treated cancer of the endometrium and breast, melanoma and otosclerosis are not contraindications to HRT.

CONCLUSIONS

The information in the pharmaceutical data sheets of HRT regimens should be modified as more accurate information could influence how these preparations are prescribed by doctors as well as affect patient compliance.

Contraception in diabetic women

Contraceptive prescription in diabetic women with current diabetic mellitus (type I or type II) or in prediabetic women with previous gestational diabetes mellitus must consider the specific metabolic effects and risks in diabetic women. This article addresses these issues, enabling the practitioner to develop individually tailored contraceptive programs to meet the changing needs and demands of the reproductive-aged diabetic woman. If focuses on the most efficacious, reversible option available--hormonal methods and intrauterine devices--both of which have been controversial for diabetic women.

Contraception. A clinical review for the internist

Effective use of contraception allows couples to control their fertility and, in certain instances, is associated with important noncontraceptive benefits. Surgical sterilization offers safe, effective, and permanent contraception for women and men. Low-dose OCPs offer safe, effective contraception for most women able and willing to take pills consistently. In addition, their use confers a variety of important noncontraceptive benefits. The availability of long-acting progestin injectable and implantable methods has made highly effective and convenient birth control available for women who are not good pill takers as well as for those for whom contraceptive doses of estrogen are contraindicated. Barrier methods are readily available and provide protection against STDs; unfortunately, erratic use is all too often associated with inadequate contraceptive efficacy. IUDs offer convenient, highly effective contraception for appropriate candidates.

Effects of low-dose oral contraceptive oestrogen and progestin on lipid peroxidation in rats

Groups of six female rats were treated with low-dose oral contraceptive (0.667 mg progestin [norethisterone acetate] and 0.02 mg oestrogen [ethinyloestradiol]/kg body-weight), or its components, separately, at the same doses, for 6 weeks. Changes in liver and kidney levels of lipid peroxides (as indicated by malondialdehyde production), free fatty acids, superoxide dismutase, and catalase liver glutathione and serum ceruloplasmin compared with the untreated control group were studied. Combined oral contraceptive treatment produced a significant increase in the activity of catalase in the kidneys (P < 0.05). The levels of lipid peroxides, free fatty acids and glutathione in the liver, and of serum ceruloplasmin increased significantly with oestrogen treatment (P < 0.05). Lipid peroxides (in the liver only), and serum ceruloplasmin decreased significantly when progestin was administered (P < 0.05). The activities of superoxide dismutase and catalase decreased significantly in the oestrogen group (except for catalase in the kidney) but increased in the progestin group (P < 0.05). The results indicate that the components of the low-dose oral contraceptive may alter liver and kidney metabolism.

Effects of contraceptive steroids on cardiovascular risk factors in women with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated established cardiovascular risk factors within lipoprotein metabolism, hemostasis, and endothelial function in women with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus who were using oral contraceptives.

STUDY DESIGN

Twenty-five women with uncomplicated insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, allocated to treatment with a monophasic combination of 30 micrograms ethinyl estradiol and 75 micrograms gestodene (treatment group, n = 12) or with nonhormonal contraception (control group, n = 13), were prospectively followed up for 12 months. Nonparametric methods were used for statistical evaluation.

RESULTS

No statistical differences in the biochemical risk markers were noted between the two groups at the start of the study. In the treatment group serum levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol decreased, whereas the concentrations of total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglycerides were unchanged. Within the coagulation system factor VII coagulant activity increased, while fibrinogen levels were unchanged. In the fibrinolytic system we found unchanged activities but decreased antigen concentrations of tissue plasminogen activator and plasminogen activator inhibitor. The concentration of von Willebrand factor increased, but no change in albumin excretion rates were found. In the control group no changes in any of the variables were observed.

CONCLUSION

Intake of modern oral contraceptives does not deteriorate the cardiovascular risk profile in women with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, but our study indicates a risk of disturbances of the endothelial integrity, which needs further investigation.

New progestogens in oral contraception

The major developments in combined oral contraceptives (COCs) have been a reduction in the total dose of both the oestrogen and progestogen administered per cycle and the introduction of new progestogens which are claimed to be more 'selective' than the older ones. This review examines in detail the clinical efficacy of the new COCs, where possible in comparison with those containing levonorgestrel or norethisterone, and their pharmacological effect on carbohydrate and lipid metabolism, haematological factors, pituitary-ovarian function and serum protein and androgen concentrations. Based mainly on the pharmacological evidence, the newer COCs are an improvement over the older low-dose formulations and are clearly preferable to the high-dose ones. However, the older low-dose COCs, despite many years of use, have not resulted in a high incidence of adverse effects. The increasing use of the new COCs, as evidenced by their increasing market share throughout Europe, does indicate that they have been well accepted in clinical practice.

Diabetes mellitus and fertility control: contraception management issues

The need to prevent complications in the woman and fetus mandates that pregnancies in diabetic women always be planned and that safe and effective contraceptives be used at all times until it is determined that pregnancy is a safe and desired option. Pregnancy may aggravate complications of diabetes such as retinopathy and coronary artery disease. A pregnant diabetic woman is also more likely to experience such complications as hypertension, urinary tract infection, polyhydramnios, and cesarean section. Her fetus is at increased risk for congenital malformations, prematurity, stillbirth, neonatal morbidity, and diabetes later in life. Good diabetic control must be maintained before and throughout the pregnancy to minimize the risk of these and other complications. Until such time as good control is achieved and the woman desires pregnancy, a reliable method of contraception should be used. Most recent research supports the use of barrier methods, low-dose monophasic or triphasic oral contraceptives, or progestin-only methods, at least for the short-term. Under some circumstances the intrauterine device may be an appropriate option. Long-term data regarding the use of these methods is lacking. The decision regarding which method of contraception is used should be made by the woman in consultation with her physician.

Contraception for women with diabetes: an update

Today several effective contraceptive methods are available for women with IDDM. Contraceptive guidance as part of the pre-pregnancy counselling needs to be more widely implemented by general practitioners and in non-specialized obstetrical and gynaecological departments. Women with diabetes are generally well motivated, and thus the barrier methods may prove both acceptable and reliable contraceptive agents for some of these women. When, however, a high risk of user failure can be predicted, the IUD or hormonal contraception may be the only reversible alternative. According to our findings, IUDs can be recommended without reservation to women with IDDM. In women with previous GDM it seems that low dose oral contraceptive compounds may be administered without running the risk of inducing glucose intolerance, but long-term results are still unavailable. Natural oestrogens may be administered in combination with a progestogen for a limited period as an efficient and acceptable mode of contraception in women with IDDM without any concomitant adverse effects on diabetic control. From our investigations it also appears that short-term administration of combined low dose OCs containing the traditional progestogens (e.g. norethisterone or levonorgestrel) or the new gonane progestogens (e.g. gestodene) does not alter glycaemic control in women with IDDM. Similarly, these compounds do not cause any significant changes in lipid/lipoprotein levels during short-term treatment, although the intake of monophasic ethinyloestradiol/norethisterone preparations may result in higher triglyceride levels and tends to increase lipid levels more than triphasic ethinyloestradiol/levonorgestrel compounds. The results from our clinic have shown that OCs can be safely recommended at pre-conception counselling so that women with diabetes can obtain both optimal glycaemic control and efficient spacing of their pregnancies.

A pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic study of the Chinese No. 1 pill

A pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic study of the Chinese No. 1 pill, a combined oral contraceptive containing 35 micrograms ethynyloestradiol (EE) and 600 micrograms norethisterone (NET), was performed in 29 women over a period of six months. Blood samples for analysis were taken during a pretreatment cycle, the first and 6th treatment cycles and post-treatment. Minor changes in carbohydrate metabolism occurred and these were particularly noticeable when the incremental areas under the serum concentration-time curves for both glucose and insulin in response to a glucose tolerance test were calculated. No changes occurred in the serum glycosylated haemoglobin levels. The serum concentrations of all the lipids measured (total cholesterol, triglycerides, LDL-C, HDL-C and apolipoproteins AI, AII and B) were significantly increased on treatment as were levels of Factor X, SHBG and caeruloplasmin whereas antithrombin III decreased. In 38 of the 40 treatment cycles, ovulation was suppressed. In one cycle serum oestradiol and progesterone levels showed a typical ovulatory pattern and in another there was evidence of follicular activity without ovulation. Serum EE concentrations showed a similar pattern in both treatment cycles showing that co-administration of NET did not affect EE metabolism. Serum NET levels were higher in the 6th than in the first treatment cycles. On comparing pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic parameters, the only statistically significant correlations were between the percentage change in triglycerides and SHBG and serum NET, but not EE concentrations, and between apolipoproteins AI and serum EE.

Oral contraceptives, insulin resistance and ischemic vascular disease

From a large prospective study on diabetes risks, 1112 professionally active, non-menopausal, non-pregnant, healthy women were cross-sectionally analysed according to their use of oral contraception. After adjustment for age, weight and diabetes risk factors, those taking the pill, compared to those who did not, had significantly higher fasting serum insulin, triglycerides and 2-h 75 g OGTT blood glucose levels. The insulin-resistance markers which have recently been cited as ischemic vascular disease risk factors should be carefully monitored in pill users.

Prospective study of carbohydrate metabolism in women using a triphasic oral contraceptive containing norethindrone and ethinyl estradiol for 3 months

Thirty-five women with normal carbohydrate metabolism were administered a 3-hour oral glucose tolerance test before and after 3 months' use of a triphasic oral contraceptive that contained ethinyl estradiol and norethindrone. The results show no significant change in either the plasma glucose or the insulin values. This is the first published study with regard to this type of triphasic oral contraceptive, and the study supports claims of the preparation's improved safety.

Management of heart transplant recipients: guidelines for the obstetrician-gynecologist

As the number and survival time of heart transplant recipients continue to increase, their quality of life, including sexuality and childbearing, have become important issues. Reproduction is possible for both male and female patients after the transplant. Counseling for contraception when sterilization is not desired must take into account the increased risk of infection and genital carcinoma associated with immunosuppressant drug therapy. Teratogenicity has not been reported either with traditional immunosuppressive agents (prednisone, azathioprine) or with cyclosporine. Osteoporosis prophylaxis is particularly important in the female heart transplant recipient, because the chronic use of prednisone increases this risk. Guidelines are provided to counsel patients in these areas.

Plasma glucose and insulin levels in women using a levonorgestrel-containing triphasic oral contraceptive for three months

Plasma glucose and insulin levels were measured for three hours after an oral glucose challenge in twenty-nine women before and after using a triphasic oral contraceptive containing ethinyl estradiol and levonorgestrel for three months. There were significant elevations in the glucose levels during the three-month tolerance test, while the insulin levels were unchanged. These data suggest that this OC can alter carbohydrate metabolism and that long-term studies are needed to assess the extent of this metabolic change.