Danazol and medroxyprogesterone acetate inefficacious in the treatment of infertility in endometriosis

Dydrogesterone in the treatment of endometriosis: evidence mapping and meta-analysis

Purpose

Endometriosis is a common, chronic gynecological disease that affects women’s fertility potential. Dydrogesterone is an effective and safe drug that is under-utilized due to limited clinical research. The purpose of this evidence mapping is to identify, describe, and analyze the current available evidence regarding dydrogesterone for the treatment of endometriosis.

Materials and methods

We performed a search in electronic databases: Medline, The Cochrane Library, EMBASE, PubMed, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, and CBM. We also hand-searched google for relevant studies. Our primary outcomes included changes in pain relief including pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, and dyspareunia. Secondary outcomes included pregnancy rate, frequency of analgesic use, and other reported outcomes according to specific settings in the studies.

Results

Of 377 references screened, 19 studies were included in the data synthesis involving 1709 female participants. Nearly three-quarters were either randomized control trials or clinical control trials. Compared with gestrinone, dydrogesterone relieved dysmenorrhea, increased the pregnancy rate, and reduced the risk of certain adverse events. Compared with GnRH-a, dydrogesterone also lowered the risk of endometriosis recurrence and elevated transaminase levels. Whether there was any difference in efficacy between dydrogesterone and leuprolide acetate, letrozole or traditional Chinese medicine remains unclear due to insufficient data.

Conclusions

The amount and quality of evidence evaluating the effects of dydrogesterone for the treatment of endometriosis is generally very low. Limited evidence suggests that dydrogesterone may have some advantages over gestrinone, GnRH agonists, and other therapeutic interventions in treating endometriosis. However, this conclusion should be interpreted with caution.

Variation in outcome reporting in endometriosis trials: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

We reviewed the outcomes and outcome measures reported in randomized controlled trials and their relationship with methodological quality, year of publication, commercial funding, and journal impact factor.

DATA SOURCES

We searched the following sources: (1) Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, (2) Embase, and (3) MEDLINE from inception to November 2014.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY

We included all randomized controlled trials evaluating a surgical intervention with or without a medical adjuvant therapy for the treatment of endometriosis symptoms.

STUDY DESIGN

Two authors independently selected trials, assessed methodological quality (Jadad score; range, 1-5), outcome reporting quality (Management of Otitis Media with Effusion in Cleft Palate criteria; range, 1-6), year of publication, impact factor in the year of publication, and commercial funding (yes or no). Univariate and bivariate analyses were performed using Spearman Rh and Mann-Whitney U tests. We used a multivariate linear regression model to assess relationship associations between outcome reporting quality and other variables.

RESULTS

There were 54 randomized controlled trials (5427 participants), which reported 164 outcomes and 113 outcome measures. The 3 most commonly reported primary outcomes were dysmenorrhea (10 outcome measures; 23 trials), dyspareunia (11 outcome measures; 21 trials), and pregnancy (3 outcome measures; 26 trials). The median quality of outcome reporting was 3 (interquartile range 4-2) and methodological quality 3 (interquartile range 5-2). Multivariate linear regression demonstrated a relationship between outcome reporting quality with methodological quality (β = 0.325; P = .038) and year of publication (β = 0.067; P = .040). No relationship was demonstrated between outcome reporting quality with journal impact factor (Rho = 0.190; P = .212) or commercial funding (P = .370).

CONCLUSION

Variation in outcome reporting within published endometriosis trials prohibits comparison, combination, and synthesis of data. This limits the usefulness of research to inform clinical practice, enhance patient care, and improve patient outcomes. In the absence of a core outcome set for endometriosis we recommend the use of the 3 most common pain (dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and pelvic pain) and subfertility (pregnancy, miscarriage, and live birth) outcomes. International consensus among stakeholders is needed to establish a core outcome set for endometriosis trials.

The Dual Estrogen Receptor α Inhibitory Effects of the Tissue-Selective Estrogen Complex for Endometrial and Breast Safety

The conjugated estrogen /: bazedoxifene tissue-selective estrogen complex (TSEC) is designed to minimize the undesirable effects of estrogen in the uterus and breast tissues and to allow the beneficial effects of estrogen in other estrogen-target tissues, such as the bone and brain. However, the molecular mechanism underlying endometrial and breast safety during TSEC use is not fully understood. Estrogen receptor α (ERα)-estrogen response element (ERE)-DNA pull-down assays using HeLa nuclear extracts followed by mass spectrometry-immunoblotting analyses revealed that, upon TSEC treatment, ERα interacted with transcriptional repressors rather than coactivators. Therefore, the TSEC-mediated recruitment of transcriptional repressors suppresses ERα-mediated transcription in the breast and uterus. In addition, TSEC treatment also degraded ERα protein in uterine tissue and breast cancer cells, but not in bone cells. Interestingly, ERα-ERE-DNA pull-down assays also revealed that, upon TSEC treatment, ERα interacted with the F-box protein 45 (FBXO45) E3 ubiquitin ligase. The loss-of- and gain-of-FBXO45 function analyses indicated that FBXO45 is involved in TSEC-mediated degradation of the ERα protein in endometrial and breast cells. In preclinical studies, these synergistic effects of TSEC on ERα inhibition also suppressed the estrogen-dependent progression of endometriosis. Therefore, the endometrial and breast safety effects of TSEC are associated with synergy between the selective recruitment of transcriptional repressors to ERα and FBXO45-mediated degradation of the ERα protein.

Progestagens and anti-progestagens for pain associated with endometriosis

BACKGROUND

Endometriosis is a chronic inflammatory condition defined by the presence of glands and stroma outside the uterine cavity. It occurs in 7% to 10% of all women of reproductive age and may present as pain or infertility. The pelvic pain may be in the form of dysmenorrhoea, dyspareunia or pelvic pain. Initially a combination of estrogens and progestagens was used to create a pseudopregnancy and alleviate the symptoms associated with endometriosis. Progestagens alone or anti-progestagens have been considered as alternatives because they are inexpensive and may have a better side effect profile than other choices.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness of both the progestagens and anti-progestagens in the treatment of painful symptoms ascribed to the diagnosis of endometriosis.

SEARCH METHODS

We used the search strategy of the Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group to identify all publications which described or might have described randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of any progestagen or any anti-progestagen in the treatment of symptomatic endometriosis. We updated the review in 2011.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We considered only RCTs which compared the use of progestagens and anti-progestagens with other interventions, placebo or no treatment for the alleviation of symptomatic endometriosis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We have added six new studies, bringing the total of included studies to 13 in the update of this review. The six newly included studies evaluated progestagens (comparisons with placebo, danazol, oral or subdermal contraceptive, oral contraceptive pill and danazol, gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogue and other drugs). The remaining studies compared the anti-progestagen gestrinone with danazol, GnRH analogues or itself.

MAIN RESULTS

The progestagen medroxyprogesterone acetate (100 mg daily) appeared to be more effective at reducing all symptoms up to 12 months of follow-up (MD -0.70, 95% CI -8.61 to -5.39; P < 0.00001) compared with placebo. There was evidence of significantly more cases of acne (six versus one) and oedema (11 versus one) in the medroxyprogesterone acetate group compared with placebo. There was no evidence of a difference in objective efficacy between dydrogesterone and placebo.There was no evidence of a benefit with depot administration of progestagens versus other treatments (low dose oral contraceptive or leuprolide acetate) for reduced symptoms. The depot progestagen group experienced significantly more adverse effects.There was no overall evidence of a benefit of oral progestagens over other medical treatment at six months of follow-up for self-reported efficacy. Amenorrhoea and bleeding were more frequently reported in the progestagen group compared with other treatment groups.There was no evidence of a benefit of anti-progestagens (gestrinone) compared with danazol. GnRH analogue (leuprorelin) was found to significantly improve dysmenorrhoea compared with gestrinone (MD 0.82, 95% CI 0.15 to 1.49; P = 0.02) although it was also associated with increased hot flushes (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.06 to -0.63; P = 0.006).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is only limited evidence to support the use of progestagens and anti-progestagens for pain associated with endometriosis.

The aetiology and pathogenesis of endometriosis

It is 130 years since the first description of endometriosis and yet this enigmatic disease still continues to confound gynaecologists. In the last five years there has been evidence which suggests that endometriosis is a much more common finding in the pelvis than previously recognized and this has created conflict over the precise definition of the disease. Currently it is difficult for clinicians to be certain what constitutes endometriosis and what is the clinical and pathological significance of the visual diagnosis of the disease. This article will review the evidence about the pathological significance of the visual diagnosis of endometriosis. It will analyze the aetiological factors that predispose to the disease and evidence concerning its pathogenesis. Finally, it will discuss the evidence that points to a particular epithelium being the origin of endometriosis.

Danazol for pelvic pain associated with endometriosis

BACKGROUND

Endometriosis is defined as the presence of endometrial tissue (stromal and glandular) outside the normal uterine cavity. Conventional medical and surgical treatments for endometriosis aim to remove or decrease the deposits of ectopic endometrium. The observation that hyper androgenic states (an excess of male hormone) induce atrophy of the endometrium has led to the use of androgens in the treatment of endometriosis. Danazol is one of these treatments. The efficacy of danazol is based on its ability to produce a high androgen and low oestrogen environment (a pseudo menopause) which results in atrophy of the endometriotic implants and thus an improvement in painful symptoms.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness of danazol compared to placebo or no treatment in the treatment of the symptoms and signs, other than infertility, of endometriosis in women of reproductive age.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group Specialised Register of trials (searched April 2007), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2007), and MEDLINE (1966 to April 2007). In addition, all reference lists of included trials were searched, and relevant drug companies were contacted for details of unpublished trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials in which danazol (alone or as adjunctive therapy) was compared to placebo or no therapy. Trials which only reported infertility outcomes were excluded.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Only five trials met the inclusion criteria and two authors independently extracted data from these trials. All trials compared danazol to placebo. Three trials used danazol as sole therapy and three trials used danazol as an adjunct to surgery. Although the main outcome was pain improvement other data relating to laparoscopic scores and hormonal parameters were also collected.

MAIN RESULTS

Treatment with danazol (including adjunctive to surgical therapy) was effective in relieving painful symptoms related to endometriosis when compared to placebo. Laparoscopic scores were improved with danazol treatment (including as adjunctive therapy) when compared with either placebo or no treatment. Side effects were more commonly reported in those patients receiving danazol than for placebo.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Danazol is effective in treating the symptoms and signs of endometriosis. However, its use is limited by the occurrence of androgenic side effects.

Ovulation suppression for endometriosis

BACKGROUND

Endometriosis is the finding of endometrial glands or stroma in sites other than the uterine cavity. Endometriosis appears to be an oestrogen dependent condition. This hormonal dependency has prompted the therapeutic use of ovulation suppression agents, in an effort to improve subsequent fertility.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of ovulation suppression agents, including danazol, progestins and oral contraceptives, in the treatment of endometriosis-associated subfertility in improving pregnancy outcomes including live birth.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Sub-fertility Group's specialised register of trials (searched October 5th, 2007) the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2007), MEDLINE (1966-October 2007), EMBASE (1980 - October 2007) and reference lists of articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials comparing an ovulation suppression agent with placebo or no treatment, or a suppressive agent with danazol or a GnRH with oral contraception in women with endometriosis. A total of twenty three RCTs comparing an ovulation suppression agent with placebo or no treatment, or a suppressive agent with danazol or a GnRH with oral contraception were identified.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed quality. We contacted study authors for additional information. Quality was assessed by of method of randomization,allocation concealment, blinding, completeness of follow-up, presence or absence of crossover and co-intervention. 2 x 2 tables were generated for all relevant outcomes. Odds ratios were generated using the Peto modified Mantel-Haenszel technique. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using the I(2) test of heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis was conducted on those couples clearly identifiable as infertile or wanting to conceive.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty four trials were included. The odds ratio for pregnancy following ovulation suppression versus placebo or no treatment for all women randomised was 0.79 (95% CI 0.54 to 1.14), P = 0.21 and 0.80 (95% CI 0.51 to 1.24), P = 0.32 respectively for subfertile couples only despite the use of a variety of suppression agents. There was no evidence of benefit from the treatment. The common odds ratio for pregnancy following all agents versus danazol for all women randomised was 1.38 (95% CI 1.05 to 1.82), P = 0.02 and OR 1.37 (95% CI 0.94 to 1.99), P = 0.10 for subfertile couples only. When GnRHa and danazol were directly compared, OR was 1.45 (95% CI 1.08 to 1.95) P = 0.01 for all women randomised and OR 1.63( 95% CI 1.12 to 2.37), P = 0.01 for subfertile couples only in favour of GnRH. No effect was observed for GnRH compared with oral contraception; OR 0.99 (95% CI 0.52 to 1.89), P = 0.98 for all women randomised and OR 0.79 ( 95% CI 0.37 to 1.69), P = 0.55. In all analyses the data were statistically homogeneous (I(2)=0%).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence of benefit in the use of ovulation suppression in subfertile women with endometriosis who wish to conceive.

Endometriosis and infertility

Women with endometriosis typically present with pelvic pain, infertility or an adnexal mass. Surgery for persistent adnexal masses may be indicated to remove an endometrioma or other pelvic pathology. Surgical or medical therapy is efficacious for pelvic pain due to endometriosis, but treatment of endometriosis in the female partner of an infertile couple raises a number of complex clinical questions that do not have simple answers.

Endométriose et infertilité

Relationship between infertility and endometriosis is still controversial. Many mechanisms have been reported such as anatomical disorders, biologic and cytological modifications of peritoneal liquid, functional ovarian and endometrial disorders, reduced embryo quality. Management of infertility related to endometriosis is difficult and no consensus has been published yet. Following recent clinical data, therapeutic strategies are discussed.

Endometriosis and infertility

Women with endometriosis typically present with pelvic pain, infertility or an adnexal mass. Surgery for persistent adnexal masses may be indicated to remove an endometrioma or other pelvic pathology. Surgical or medical therapy is efficacious for pelvic pain due to endometriosis, but treatment of endometriosis in the female partner of an infertile couple raises a number of complex clinical questions that do not have simple answers.

Endometriosis and infertility

Women with endometriosis typically present with pelvic pain, infertility or an adnexal mass. Surgery for persistent adnexal masses may be indicated to remove an endometrioma or other pelvic pathology. Surgical or medical therapy is efficacious for pelvic pain due to endometriosis, but treatment of endometriosis in the female partner of an infertile couple raises a number of complex clinical questions that do not have simple answers.

A comparison of ovulation suppression and ovulation stimulation in the treatment of endometriosis-associated infertility

This study compares ovulation stimulation or suppression with the pregnancy rate among infertile couples with endometriosis. The design is a nonrandomized, prospective, multicentered cohort analytic study. Two hundred and ninety-seven couples with laparoscopy-proven endometriosis were analyzed: 68 received no therapy, 42 received clomiphene and 74 received danazol. Forty patients (22%) conceived and pregnancy rates were similar in each treatment group. The relative likelihood of pregnancy associated with clomiphene was 2.9 (95% confidence limits 1.2-7.1); the relative likelihood of pregnancy with danazol was 1.02 (95% confidence limits 0.5-2.3). This study suggests that pregnancy rates during clomiphene treatment could be superior to expectant therapy, while pregnancy rate after danazol is similar to no treatment.

An evidence-based evaluation of endometriosis-associated infertility

Although endometriosis is associated with infertility, a clear causal relationship has yet to be established, unless adhesive disease is found. Despite this indirect association, multiple theories have been promulgated and studies are currently underway to investigate theoretic pathogenetic mechanisms. The data regarding the treatment of endometriosis-associated infertility are limited and conflicting; however, some general preliminary conclusions can be drawn. It seems that, with early-stage disease, surgical treatment increases pregnancy rates. Using the US Preventive Services Task Force classification scheme, the evidence in support of this finding is of the highest quality, or level I. Surgical treatment for moderate and severe disease also confers benefit, although the evidence in support of this treatment is of lesser quality, level II-3 by the scheme. Medical treatment, particularly if it induces an anovulatory state, has no benefit and may delay fertility. This evidence is again of the highest quality, with a classification of level I. Although assisted reproductive technologies are of benefit regarding fertility for women with endometriosis, the IVF evidence is inconclusive, with both treatments being evaluated by at least one randomized, controlled trial conferring a level I classification to the evidence. It is unclear at this time whether endometriomas have an impact on IVF outcome. The evidence consists of only a few lower-quality studies, with a classification level of II-2. Despite the haziness of current insight into the treatment of endometriosis-associated infertility, well-designed clinical trials and basic mechanistic investigations are underway in many reproductive medicine centers. As the data from these scientific inquiries emerge, clinicians will have a clearer view of effective treatment regimens for endometriosis.

Ovulation suppression for endometriosis

BACKGROUND

Endometriosis is the finding of endometrial glands or stroma in sites other than the uterine cavity. Endometriosis appears to be an estrogen dependent condition. This hormonal dependency has prompted the therapeutic use of ovulation suppression agents, in an effort to improve subsequent fertility.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness of a) ovulation suppression with danazol, medroxy progesterone acetate, gestrinone, combined oral contraceptive pills and GnRH analogues versus placebo or no treatment and b) any of the above agents versus danazol, for the treatment of endometriosis-associated subfertility.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group trial register (searched 30 April 2002), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2002), MEDLINE (January 1966 to December 1998), EMBASE (January 1985 to December 1997) and reference lists of articles. We also contacted manufacturers and researchers in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Trials comparing the interventions described above, were included if allocation to treatment was based on a random process. Six RCTs with seven treatment arms compared an ovulation suppression agent with placebo or no treatment. Ten trials were identified comparing a suppressive agent with danazol.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Relevant data were extracted independently by two reviewers using the standardised data extraction sheet. Validity was assessed in terms of method of randomisation, completeness of follow-up, presence or absence of crossover and co-intervention. 2 x 2 tables were generated for all relevant outcomes. Odds ratios were generated using the Peto modified Mantel-Haenszel technique. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using Breslow-Day X2.

MAIN RESULTS

The odds ratio for pregnancy following ovulation suppression versus placebo or no treatment was 0.74 (95%CI 0.48 to 1.15). These data were statistically homogeneous, despite the use of a variety of suppression agents. They suggest no statistically significant benefit from treatment. The odds ratio for pregnancy following all agents versus danazol, the most commonly used agent prior to the advent of gonadotropin releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa), was 1.3 (95% CI 0.97 to 1.76). When GnRHa and danazol were directly compared, the odds ratio for pregnancy across six trials, was similar to the summary statistic for all ten studies: 1.29 (95% CI 0.9 to 1.85). Again, this suggests no statistically significant difference between these interventions.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

These results rule out a benefit of more than a 15% increase in odds, and do not justify the risk of side effects when used as therapy for endometriosis-associated subfertility.

Female subfertility

With an average monthly fecundity rate of only 20%, human beings are not fertile mammals. 10-15% of couples have difficulties conceiving, or conceiving the number of children they want, and seek specialist fertility care at least once during their reproductive lifetime. Dependent on the two main factors that determine subfertility, duration of childlessness and age of the woman, three questions need to be addressed before treatment is offered. Is it time to start the routine fertility investigation?--ie, has sufficient exposure to the chance of conception taken place? Are cost-effective, safe, and reliable treatments available for the disorder diagnosed? And, should the couple be referred straightaway for assisted reproduction?

The treatment of endometriosis: a review of the evidence

The treatment of endometriosis focuses upon amelioration of two symptoms: pain and infertility. The treatment of endometriosis-associated pain has been well studied and all major medical therapies appear to be superior to placebo. In addition, none seems to be drastically better than another. Surgical therapy also appears to be efficacious, albeit with a relatively high rate of recurrence of symptoms following conservative surgical intervention. There are no trials comparing the relative value of medical versus surgical therapy. Combination surgery/medical therapy has several high-quality trials for evaluation, but its value remains unclear. The treatment of endometriosis-associated infertility presents a different picture: medical therapy has not been shown to be of any value and may prove detrimental to fertility. Surgical treatment does improve fertility, probably for all stages of disease. Assisted reproduction also seems to be efficacious, with both controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination as well as in vitro fertilization shown to be of benefit. Finally, the combination of in vitro fertilization and either medical or surgical therapy may be beneficial with advanced endometriosis, but further study is required.

Women who are not exposed to spermatozoa and infertile women have similar rates of stage I endometriosis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the prevalence of endometriosis and its different stages in infertile women and women not exposed to spermatozoa.

DESIGN

Prospective study.

SETTING

Artificial insemination donor program at a university hospital.

PATIENT(S)

One hundred fifty women unable to conceive because they had not been exposed to spermatozoa (134 with azoospermic partner, 10 with an HIV-positive partner, and 6 without a male partner). Controls were 750 women in infertile couples in which the male partner had normal sperm.

INTERVENTION(S)

Laparoscopy was systematically performed in a blinded manner in both groups as part of the infertility work-up.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Diagnosis of endometriosis.

RESULT(S)

In unexposed women and controls, the prevalence of endometriosis was similar (32% and 34.5%). Rates of stage I disease were also similar in both groups (26% and 19.3%). There was a significant trend toward higher stages of endometriosis in infertile women (stage II disease, 3.3% vs. 5.7%; stage III disease, 1.3% vs. 3.1%; stage IV disease, 1.3% vs. 6.4%). Endometriosis was not associated with the few demographic characteristics that differed between groups.

CONCLUSION(S)

From an epidemiologic point of view, stage I endometriosis is not more common in infertile women than in unselected women. However, stage II to IV endometriosis was more frequent in infertile women. Whereas a relation between stage I endometriosis and infertility seems unlikely, the relation between stages II to IV endometriosis and infertility seems possible.

Endometriosis: an overview of the disease and its treatment

OBJECTIVE

To review endometriosis, its etiology, clinical presentation, and current management options.

DATA SOURCES

Published articles identified through MEDLINE (1966-2000) using the search term "endometriosis" and the additional terms "etiology" and "treatment." Additional articles were identified from the bibliographies of the retrieved articles.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Endometriosis, a disease that affects the physical health and emotional well-being of many women of reproductive age, is defined as the presence of endometrial tissue outside its normal location in the uterus. The disease ranges in severity from mild to severe, and patients may be asymptomatic or experience severe and potentially incapacitating symptoms, such as dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and infertility. The diagnosis can be confirmed only by direct visualization using laparoscopy and biopsy. The risk of endometriosis is increased in women who have an affected first-degree relative or who have shorter menstrual cycle lengths, longer duration of menstrual flow, and low parity. The etiology of endometriosis is not yet fully understand, but may involve retrograde menstruation, hereditary factors, and impaired immune function. Treatment should be individualized for each patient, taking into account the therapeutic goals, the extent of disease, symptomatology, and the woman's age and overall health. Treatment options include expectant management, hormonal therapies to suppress ovarian steroidogenesis and induce endometrial atrophy, and surgery to remove visible lesions or, as a last resort, the uterus and ovaries.

CONCLUSION

Although the precise etiology of endometriosis remains a mystery, treatment options have improved considerably in recent years. Pharmacists are well positioned to identify women with unexplained pelvic pain or infertility that may be indicative of endometriosis and refer them to their physicians for further evaluation. Pharmacists also can play an important role in counseling patients about the safe and effective use of the various treatments for this disease and strategies to recognize and reduce adverse effects.

Progestagens and anti-progestagens for pain associated with endometriosis

BACKGROUND

Endometriosis is a gynaecological condition that presents either with the problem of infertility or with painful symptoms. The clinical observation of an apparent resolution of symptoms during pregnancy gave rise to the concept of treating patients with a pseudo-pregnancy regime. Initially combinations of high dose oestrogens and progestagens were used but this was subsequently replaced by progestogens alone. More recently progestogens of both progestagens and anti-progestagens in the treatment of symptomatiprogestogenssis

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness of both the progestagens and anti-progestagens in the treatment of painful symptoms ascribed to the diagnosis of endometriosis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The search strategy of the Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group was utilised to identify all publications which described or might have described randomised trials of any progestagen or any anti-progestagen in the treatment of symptomatic endometriosis.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Trials were included if they were randomised and considered the effectiveness of either a progestagen or an anti-progestagen in the treatment of painful symptoms associated with endometriosis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Seven studies were considered to be appropriate for inclusion in this review. Only three studies evaluating progestagens were included (comparison with placebo, danazol and oral contraceptive plus danazol). All other studies compared the anti-progestagen, gestrinone, with other medical therapies.

MAIN RESULTS

Progestagens appear to be an effective therapy for the painful symptoms associated with endometriosis. Gestrinone is as effective as other established medical therapies (danazol and GnRH analogues).

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

The limited available data suggests that both continuous progestagens and anti-progestagens are effective therapies in the treatment of painful symptoms associated with endometriosis. Progestagens given in the luteal phase are not effective. These conclusions should be accepted cautiously due to a lack of data.

Danazol for pelvic pain associated with endometriosis

BACKGROUND

Endometriosis is defined as the presence of endometrial tissue (stromal and glandular) outside the normal uterine cavity. Conventional medical and surgical treatments for endometriosis aim to remove or decrease deposits of ectopic endometrium. The observation that hyperandrogenic states (an excess of male hormone) induce atrophy of the endometrium has led to the use of androgens in the treatment of endometriosis. Danazol is one of these treatments used. The efficacy of danazol is based on its ability to produce a high androgen/low estrogen environment (a pseudo menopause) which results in the atrophy of endometriotic implants and thus an improvement in painful symptoms.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness of danazol compared to placebo or no treatment in the treatment of the symptoms and signs, other than infertility, of endometriosis in women of reproductive age.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Menstrual Disorders Group search strategy was used to identify randomised controlled trials of the use of danazol in endometriosis. In addition, all reference lists of included trials were searched, and relevant drug companies were contacted for details of unpublished trials

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials in which danazol (alone or as adjunctive therapy) was compared to placebo or no therapy. Trials which only reported infertility outcomes were excluded.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Only four trials met the inclusion criteria and two authors extracted data independently from these trials. All four trials compared danazol to placebo. Two trials used danazol as sole therapy and two trials used danazol as an adjunct to surgery. Although the main outcome was pain improvement other data relating to laparoscopic scores and hormonal parameters were also collected.

MAIN RESULTS

Treatment with danazol (including adjunctive surgical therapy) was effective in relieving painful symptoms related to endometriosis when compared to placebo. Laparoscopic scores were improved with danazol treatment (including adjunctive therapy) when compared with either placebo or no treatment. Side effects were more commonly reported in those patients receiving danazol than placebo.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Danazol is effective in treating the symptoms and signs of endometriosis. However, its use is limited by the occurrence of androgenic side effects.

Today's treatments: medical, surgical and in partnership

OBJECTIVE

To provide an overview of the medical, surgical and combined therapy options for endometriosis.

RESULTS

Available medical options include danazol, progestogens, gestrinone, oral contraceptive agents, analgesics and gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists. Used in the short-term, most of these agents relieve pain in a large proportion of patients and produce disease regression, however, they do not prevent recurrence, and are associated with side-effects. However, few data confirm any benefit of short-term medical therapy on fertility. One of the most promising medical approaches appears to be GnRH agonists with add-back hormone replacement therapy. Surgery may relieve pain, eradicate visible disease and improve fertility. A combined approach may facilitate surgery and relieve pain, although any fertility benefit is as yet unproven.

CONCLUSION

Both short-term medical treatment and surgery relieve endometriosis-associated pain and decrease endometriotic implants. However, all approaches have side effects which must be balanced against the benefits when defining suitable treatment for a particular patient.

"The Flemish Giant", reflections on the defense against endometriosis, inspired by Professor Emeritus Ivo A. Brosens

Reproductive research benefits from combining animal and clinical studies. In Leuven, rabbits have constituted an animal model for many reproductive disorders, especially for those that involved surgical treatment. Much of what has been learned from animal experiments has been applied to human clinical reproductive research soon after. In this manuscript we wish to address the problem of the constant intra-abdominal battle between the menstrual aggressor and the peritoneal defense. From all published evidence we may conclude that endometriosis appears to be a dynamic disease, especially in the early phase, with subtle, atypical lesions emerging and vanishing again. In the end however the peritoneal defense system will prevail and the disease will be contained in the majority of patients. When doing repeat laparoscopies in young patients one should be prepared to encounter more advanced histological types of lesions, which not necessarily do have to indicate more advanced stages of the disease: the classical, blue and black powderburn spots and blueberry lesions reflect the extinguishing phase of the dynamic endometriotic process, and herald its inactivated histological end-stage. The dynamic phase of the disease may involve a varying interval of each patient's life, and medical suppression of the activity of the implants during this interval may lead one to conclude erroneously that treatment has been effective. If subsequently (after the end of medical suppression of the activity of the lesions) ovarian activity resumes and the lesions are stimulated again by ovarian steroids, their productive activity returns. Recurrence of disease may be diagnosed if at that stage a laparoscopy would be performed, whereas in reality only reactivation of temporarily obscured lesions did occur. The suppressed, dormant (but never absent) lesions produce mucus again, desquamation occurs, and reaction by the surrounding tissue. The inflammatory response, the local hyperemia and the neogenesis of vessels accentuate the presence of previously invisible endometriosis lesions and make them visible again. Endometriosis resumes its temporarily halted natural course of development, tissue remodeling occurs again, the battle between the aggressor and the defense resumes and waxing and waning of the several types of lesions, red, white and black, can be found again.

Effects of endometriomas on ooccyte quality, embryo quality, and pregnancy rates in in vitro fertilization cycles: a prospective, case-controlled study

PURPOSE

The effect of endometriomas on oocyte quality, embryo quality, and pregnancy rates in in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles was evaluated.

METHODS

Forty-five women had "chocolate" cysts aspirated at the time of oocyte retrieval, and cyst fluid CA 125 levels were measured to ascertain presence of "true" endometriomas. Fifty-seven women without any complex cysts at the time of oocyte retrieval served as controls. IVF cycle outcome parameters were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Women with endometriomas experienced a significantly higher rate of early pregnancy loss compared to controls (47 vs 14%). There was also a trend toward fewer oocytes retrieved and fewer embryos reaching at least the four-cell stage 48 hr after retrieval in patients with true endometriomas vs controls.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of endometriomas at the time of oocyte retrieval is associated with increased rates of early pregnancy losses. The number of oocytes retrieved and the embryo quality may also be affected adversely in the presence of endometriomas.

Endometriosis and spontaneous abortion rate: a cohort study in infertile women

OBJECTIVE

To ascertain if there is an association between endometriosis and spontaneous abortion.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Medical School Hospital.

POPULATION

174 infertile women laparoscopically diagnosed with endometriosis and 174 infertile women in which endometriosis was ruled out by laparoscopy, in the same period of time.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Spontaneous abortion. Non-progressive gestational sac and/or histological study.

RESULTS

Per woman abortion rate was 7.47% (13/174) in the endometriosis group, similar to 5.74% (10/174) in the infertile women without endometriosis (RR=1.32: CI=0.53-3.36). Nor were there any differences in the per pregnancy abortion rate: 20.96% (13/62) in endometriosis vs. 16.94% (10/59) in non-endometriosis (RR=1.3; CI=0.47-3.57). The abortion rate was similar in the different AFS stages: 22.86% (8/35) in stage I, 16.67% (3/18) in II, 25% (1/4) in III and 20% (1/5) in IV. In stage I no differences were observed in patients who were managed expectantly or with medical treatment.

CONCLUSION

Endometriosis is not associated with an increased abortion rate. The severity of disease expressed by AFS staging is not associated with an increase in the abortion rate. In stage I the treatment of endometriosis did not decrease abortion rates.

Progestins for symptomatic endometriosis: a critical analysis of the evidence

OBJECTIVE

To obtain estimates of the effects of progestin treatment for pelvic pain associated with endometriosis.

DATA IDENTIFICATION

Information from studies published in the English-language literature between 1966 and 1996 was pooled. Articles were identified through hand and computerized searches using MEDLINE.

STUDY SELECTION

A total of 27 trials that were published in peer-reviewed journals were identified, and 13 of these were excluded from the analysis because of methodologic limitations. Nine of the remaining 14 studies were noncomparative (8 prospective and 1 retrospective), 1 was quasi-randomized, and 4 were true randomized controlled trials.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

The sample size was generally limited; the mean number of patients included was 26 in the noncomparative trials and 29 in the randomized controlled trials. The mean duration of treatment was 6 months. A total of 355 women had pain at entry. Considering all noncomparative studies, the pooled frequency of nonresponders at the end of treatment was 9% (18/203; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.3% to 13.6%). The common odds ratio from the four randomized controlled trials comparing progestins with danazol or a GnRH agonist was 1.1 (95% CI, 0.4 to 3.1), suggesting equivalence in treatment effect. In the only double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, the frequency of nonresponders was not significantly different in the two arms. Only four studies assessed pain after drug withdrawal. The pooled frequency of pelvic pain at the end of follow-up was 50% (35/70; 95% CI, 37.8% to 62.2%). The overall crude conception rate after therapy among women who desired pregnancy was 44% (86/194; 95% CI, 37.2% to 51.6%). Side effects of limited clinical relevance were observed frequently.

CONCLUSION(S)

The available data suggest that the efficacy of progestins for temporary relief of endometriosis-associated pelvic pain is good and comparable to that of other, less safe treatments.

Surgical treatment of endometriosis-associated infertility: meta-analysis compared with survival analysis

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to evaluate the role of surgery in the treatment of endometriosis associated with infertility.

STUDY DESIGN

We used a prospective cohort analysis of pregnancy rates and variables affecting pregnancy rates for surgical, medical, and no treatment. Our studies were combined with those reported by Hughes et al. (Fertil Steril 1993; 59:963-70), and the meta-analysis was expanded to include additional comparisons. Treatment was performed by a single surgeon in a referral reproductive endocrinology and surgery private practice. Results from 579 women with endometriosis and infertility in our study and the meta-analysis of 25 studies by Hughes et al. were examined. Interventions consisted of no treatment, medical treatment, or surgical treatment by laparoscopy or laparotomy. The main outcome measure was pregnancy rates.

RESULTS

For minimal and mild disease, no treatment, laparoscopy, and laparotomy had equivalent 3-year estimated cumulative life-table pregnancy rates (67% +/- 12%, 68% +/- 4%, and 74% +/- 8%, respectively) that were higher than medical treatment pregnancy rates (Breslow p = 0.003). For moderate and severe disease, all but 11 patients were treated surgically. The 3-year estimated cumulative life-table pregnancy rates were 62% + 6% [corrected] for 120 laparoscopy cases and 44% + 6% [corrected] for 102 laparotomy cases (Breslow p = 0.054). For endometriomas, 48 laparoscopy patients had a 3-year estimated cumulative life-table pregnancy rate of 52% +/- 9% and 52 laparotomy patients had a 3-year estimated cumulative life-table pregnancy rate of 46% +/- 9% (Breslow p = 0.48). For 28 patients with complete cul-de-sac obliteration, the 3-year estimated cumulative life-table pregnancy rates were 30% +/- 14% after laparoscopy and 24% +/- 12% after laparotomy (Breslow p = 0.084). Comparison of our results with the expanded meta-analysis revealed deficiencies in the design of meta-analysis studies and the impact of our using life-table pregnancy rates controlled for factors influencing outcome (survival analysis with fixed covariates) rather than the simple pregnancy rates used in the meta-analysis. Benefits of sophisticated statistical techniques, including propensity scores, to adjust for noncomparability of groups in prospective cohort studies were identified.

CONCLUSION

Both our study and the meta-analysis show that either no treatment or surgery is superior to medical treatment for minimal and mild endometriosis associated with infertility. For moderate and severe disease, surgery is usually used. In these patients experienced surgeons utilizing good clinical judgment can achieve results at operative laparoscopy at least equivalent to those at laparotomy, even in cases involving endometriomas and complete cul-de-sac obliteration. Prospective randomized trials should be performed to confirm these findings.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of luteal phase dydrogesterone (Duphaston) in women with minimal to mild endometriosis

OBJECTIVE

To compare dydrogesterone with placebos in the treatment of minimal to mild endometriosis.

DESIGN

Prospective, double-blind, randomized study.

SETTING

Three Obstetrics and Gynaecology Departments in the United Kingdom.

PATIENTS

Sixty-two premenopausal women with complaints of pain (n = 12) and infertility with or without pain (n = 50) with minimal to mild endometriosis diagnosed at laparoscopy. Thirty-nine women had a laparoscopy after treatment and 56 women were followed up 12 months after treatment.

INTERVENTIONS

Two high doses of dydrogesterone (either 40 or 60 mg) or a placebo, which was given for 12 days, beginning 2 days after the LH surge for a treatment period of 6 months.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Change between before and after treatment endometriosis scores, pregnancy rates (PRs), and pain.

RESULTS

Treatment with dydrogesterone did not alter the natural history of endometriosis or PRs when compared with placebo. Pain was reduced significantly during treatment with 60 mg dydrogesterone and this improvement still was evident at 12-month follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Luteal phase dydrogesterone reduces pain associated with endometriosis.

Endometriosis: medical therapy

The management of women with endometriosis is complex and necessitates individualization of patient care. The most commonly used medical therapies are danazol, GnRH agonists, medroxyprogesterone acetate and gestrinone. Studies to date have shown these drugs to have equal efficacy in terms of reduction in laparoscopic score and relief of symptoms. However, their side-effects make them unsuitable for long-term use. The addition of low dose hormone replacement therapy to GnRH agonist regimens may allow prolonged use but the current cost of these agents is high. Low dose oral contraceptive pills deserve further investigation. The role of medical treatment for women with endometriosis and infertility is controversial. There is no place for hormonal therapy in such women with stage I or II disease. When expectant management fails, gamete intrafallopian transfer offers excellent results. For those with stage III or IV disease, surgery is preferable with adjunctive medical therapy in selected cases. If pregnancy does not ensue, in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer are the next line of management, and results are optimized by prior medical therapy and aspiration of endometriomas. Major advances have been made in the medical management of endometriosis. However, current treatment strategies are ineffective in eliminating the disease in most women. New approaches are required in both basic and clinical research in order to finally eradicate this often devastating disease.

Infertility treatment: from cookery to science. The epidemiology of randomised controlled trials

OBJECTIVES

To review the epidemiology of published randomised controlled trials in infertility treatment over the last 25 years, with special emphasis on the number and quality of trials.

DESIGN

Computer literature review by MEDLINE backed up by a manual search of 41 journals. Each trial was classified according to the methodology described and quality criteria. The results were recorded in a computer database. Odds ratios (OR) and confidence intervals (CI) were calculated where the data were sufficient.

SUBJECTS

Couples suffering from primary or secondary infertility. The trials studied 33,761 patients overall.

SETTING

Institute of Epidemiology and Health Services Research, Leeds.

RESULTS

Five hundred and one randomised trials in male and female infertility treatment were identified between 1966 and 1990. Pregnancy was an outcome in 291 (58%) and these were the subject of detailed analysis. Two hundred and twenty-four (77%) and 67 (23%) 'pregnancy trials' were concerned, respectively, with female and male infertility. Four per cent of the trials were preceded by a sample size calculation, and the average sample size was 96 patients (range 5-933); 700 patients per group would be required to demonstrate plausible success rates for most treatments. The method of randomisation was unstated or pseudo-randomised in 206 (71%) of trials where pregnancy was an outcome. Only 29 (5.8%) of studies were multicentre. The method of confirmation of pregnancy was omitted for 70% of papers. Cross-over design was used in 103 (21%) of cases. Meta-analysis is possible for selected topics such as the use of anti-oestrogens in idiopathic oligospermia and unexplained female infertility. Eight cases of double reporting were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Trials using randomised methodology were relatively few in comparison with other branches of medicine, although their use is important in the evaluation of treatment for infertility as treatment-independent pregnancy is common. It was encouraging to note that an exponential increase in the use of this methodology occurred during the last three years, especially in association with assisted conception techniques, and meta-analysis has become possible for selected topics. However, many trials suffer from an unrealistically small sample size, inappropriate use of cross-over design or pseudo-randomisation. The trend towards properly controlled studies should be encouraged but these studies should be of improved quality and organised on a multicentre or even international basis.

Laparoscopic evaluation of the onset and progression of endometriosis

OBJECTIVE

To clarify the pathogenesis of endometriosis on the basis of analysis of primary lesion sites, age at onset, rate of progression, and response to drug treatment.

STUDY DESIGN

The clinical records of 690 women with laparoscopically confirmed endometriosis were retrospectively analyzed based on the revised American Fertility Society point system.

RESULTS

The primary site of endometriosis was the uterosacral ligament and pelvic peritoneum/pouch of Douglas in 73% of patients with stage I disease, whereas only 16% had ovarian lesions. However, disease progression was associated with an increasing frequency of ovarian lesions. In terms of the revised American Fertility Society score, endometriosis progressed at a mean rate of 0.3 point per month. Thus the earliest onset of endometriosis was estimated at 3 to 4 years after menarche. Drug therapy improved the revised American Fertility Society score by about 50%. Patients with a low response to an initial cycle of therapy generally showed further improvement after an additional treatment cycle.

CONCLUSIONS

Because endometriosis may occur as early as 3 to 4 years after menarche and gradually progresses, drug therapy, including long-term treatment, should be carried out in women with definitive evidence of endometriosis who must maintain their reproductive potential.

The prevalence of endometriosis in women with infertile partners

Laparoscopy was performed on a consecutive series of 174 women complaining of infertility. Forty of these women were the partners of oligospermic or azoospermic men. There was no difference in the prevalence of endometriosis between those women whose partners were fertile and those whose partners were infertile. Women with azoospermic partners had a prevalence of endometriosis of 20.7%, and this is likely to reflect the true prevalence of endometriosis in a group of randomly selected normal women.

Superovulation with human menopausal gonadotropins in the treatment of infertility associated with minimal or mild endometriosis: a controlled randomized study

OBJECTIVE

To determine the efficacy of superovulation with buserelin acetate, human menopausal gonadotropins (hMG), and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) in the treatment of infertility associated with minimal or mild endometriosis.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, controlled study.

SUBJECTS

Forty-nine infertile women with a laparoscopic diagnosis of endometriosis stage I (n = 29) or II (n = 20) according to the revised American Fertility Society classification, randomly assigned to three superovulation cycles (n = 24) or 6 months' expectant management (n = 25).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Cycle fecundity rates and cumulative pregnancy rates (CPR) in the two groups.

RESULTS

Nine pregnancies were obtained in the superovulation-treated patients and six in the nontreated ones. The cycle fecundity rates and CPR were 0.15% and 37.4% after three superovulation cycles and 0.045% and 24% after 6 months of expectant management (P less than 0.05 and P = not significant, respectively). The women who did not achieve a pregnancy after three cycles of superovulation were followed for a total of 50 months during which no therapy was given. One pregnancy started in this period (cycle fecundity rate = 0.020). One spontaneous abortion occurred in each group. Three treated patients had multiple pregnancies, and four had ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.

CONCLUSION

Superovulation seems to be associated with a better cycle fecundity rate but not a better CPR than expectant management in infertile women with endometriosis stages I and II. The efficacy and side effects of this therapeutic approach should be evaluated in larger series.

Buserelin acetate versus expectant management in the treatment of infertility associated with minimal or mild endometriosis: a randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

We performed a randomized clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of intranasal 400 micrograms buserelin three times daily for 6 months versus expectant management in the treatment of infertile women with pelvic endometriosis stage I or II of the revised American Fertility Society classification.

STUDY DESIGN

Seventy-one consecutive patients (mean age 32 years) were studied at the First Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Milan, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ospedali Riuniti, Bergamo, between February 1988 and June 1989. Thirty-five women were randomly allocated to buserelin treatment and 36 to expectant management. The baseline distribution of subjects for age, disease stage, and reproductive history was similar in the two groups. All patients were followed regularly; median follow-up was 17 months in the buserelin group and 18 months in the women given expectant management. If pregnancy did not occur within 12 months of randomization, cycles were monitored by ultrasonography and hormone measurements, and when abnormalities were detected clomiphene citrate and human chorionic gonadotropin were administered.

RESULTS

A total of 17 pregnancies were observed both in the buserelin-treated patients and in the expectant management group. The 1- and 2-year actuarial overall pregnancy rates were similar in the two groups, 30% and 61% in the former and 37% and 61% in the latter group, respectively. Spontaneous abortion occurred in five of the 17 pregnancies in the women treated with buserelin and in one of the 17 in those managed expectantly; this difference was, however, not statistically significant (chi 1(2) adjusted for disease stage and use of clomiphene citrate and human chorionic gonadotropin treatment = 3.01, p = 0.08). No fetal death or stillbirth was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that treatment with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists is unlikely to have a marked influence on the reproductive outcome of infertile women with minimal or mild endometriosis.

Hormone treatment of endometriosis: the estrogen threshold hypothesis

In women with recurrent pelvic pain caused by endometriosis, hormonal therapy with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist is an effective alternative to surgical therapy. The basis for medical treatment of endometriosis is that endometriosis lesions are dependent on estradiol for continued growth. Further, end organ tissue varies in its sensitivity to estradiol. This forms the basis of the estrogen threshold hypothesis, that is, that a concentration of estradiol that will partially prevent bone loss may not stimulate endometrial growth. Thus there is a hierarchy of organ response to estradiol such that calcium metabolism is most sensitive followed by gonadotropin secretion, vaginal epithelial growth, lipid metabolism, and liver protein production. Similarly, breast cancer is most sensitive and endometriosis is least sensitive to estrogen. These differences may allow the design of regimens with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist that maintain a therapeutic response and ameliorate potential adverse effects.

Placebo-controlled comparison of hormonal and biochemical effects of danazol and high-dose medroxyprogesterone acetate

The hormonal and biochemical effects of danazol (600 mg a day) and high-dose medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA; 100 mg a day) were studied in a placebo-controlled, 6-month trial. Serum gonadotrophins and prolactin levels did not change during danazol and MPA treatments, whereas oestradiol and progesterone levels decreased significantly in relation to placebo without any difference between danazol and MPA. Both drugs significantly suppressed the sex hormone-binding globulin level (SHBG), and consequently, the free-androgen index (serum total testosterone nmol/l per SHBG nmol/l x 100) as compared with placebo, the effect of danazol being significantly stronger than that of MPA. Danazol, but not MPA, significantly increased serum aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT), alanine aminotransferase (ALAT) and haemoglobin levels, and also thrombocyte counts, whereas MPA, but not danazol, increased the serum concentration of albumin in relation to placebo. Serum total bilirubin, conjugated bilirubin, gamma-glutamyl transferase, creatinine, alkaline phosphatase, sodium and potassium levels and leucocyte counts remained unchanged during both treatments. Danazol and high-dose MPA did not differ from each other in their ovarian and anterior pituitary effects, while the increase in androgenic activity induced by danazol was greater than that achieved with MPA. Danazol also had more biochemical effects than MPA. It interfered with the functions of the liver and the production of thrombocytes and haemoglobin, whereas MPA affected only albumin synthesis/release.

Comparison of different ovarian stimulation protocols for gamete intrafallopian transfer in patients with minimal and mild endometriosis

Three different stimulation protocols were tested in patients affected by stage I and II endometriosis with no other causes of infertility, and scheduled for the gamete intrafallopian transfer technique. In two protocols a gonadotropin hormone-releasing hormone analog was used. The analog was started 6 months before stimulation in the former and along with the exogenous gonadotropin in the latter. Patients receiving only gonadotropin served as controls. Sixty patients were selected for this study; 55 reached laparoscopy. Whereas patients receiving either gonadotropin alone or simultaneous analog and gonadotropin had similar pregnancy rates, this was much higher in the patients undergoing a prolonged, medically induced hypoestrogenism. Prolonged analog pretreatment before ovarian stimulation may give better chances of success in endometriosis patients undergoing assisted reproduction techniques.

Endometriosis and infertility

The relationship of endometriosis, the most common benign gynaecological disease during reproductive life, to infertility is generally ill understood. The association between infertility and minimal to mild endometriosis, when no anatomical defect is evident, may be explained by the following possible mechanisms: alternations in peritoneal fluid (macrophages - immunoglobulins, Interleukin-1, protease inhibitors, prostanoids, an ovum capture inhibitor), ovulatory dysfunctions (anovulation, LUF syndrome), luteal phase defect, disturbed implantation, and spontaneous abortion. These possibilities are discussed. The latest prospective controlled studies offer strong evidence that endometriosis per se is not a direct cause of infertility. On the other hand, the disease usually deteriorates if not treated, and therefore medical or surgical interventions are often needed when expectant treatment or other infertility therapies, e.g., ovulation induction, fail to result in pregnancy. Women with minimal to mild endometriosis only should be diagnosed as having unexplained infertility, which today may be treated by in vitro fertilization.