Gastric pacing as a treatment for intractable gastroparesis: shocking news?

Temporary Gastric Stimulation in Patients With Gastroparesis Symptoms: Low-Resolution Mapping Multiple Versus Single Mucosal Lead Electrograms

Background

Cajal cells have a fundamental role in generating slow waves that regulate gastric motility. Gastric electrical stimulation (GES) is Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved for symptomatic treatment of drug refractory gastroparesis. We hypothesized that using two leads will vary from a single lead by providing greater insight of gastric electrical wave propagation, through differences in measured frequency, amplitude, and frequency over amplitude ratio. We also hypothesized that a significant reduction in symptomatic vomiting score is highly predictive in a single lead temporary gastric electrical stimulation.

Methods

A total of 111 patients with drug-refractory gastroparesis were enrolled. Forty-two patients had single lead, while 69 patients had two leads. All recordings measured mean frequency and amplitude in each lead. Patients documented symptoms using standardized symptom scores at baseline and day 5 post-procedure.

Results

Single lead patients with initial low mucosal frequency showed an increase from 3.10 to 4.93 (P = 0.0155), while the high frequency group decreased from 5.89 to 5.12 (P = 0.135). Vomiting score decreased significantly among both groups with GES (P = 0.0001). For two leads, the mucosal frequency decreased at the proximal electrode (P = 0.402), and increased at the distal electrode (P = 0.514), neither statistically significant (P = 0.143). Mucosal electrogram amplitude values changed for both proximal, mean decrease of 0.34 mV (P = 0.241), and distal, mean increase of 0.05 mV (P = 0.65) with a mean difference 0.34 mV (P = 0.238). However, mucosal electrogram frequency and amplitudes on day 5 were highly dependent on the baseline values (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Compared to the use of single point electrodes, the use of two low-resolution electrodes allows recording gastric electrical wave propagation with greater detail. Low resolution recording appears to be superior to single point recordings, while awaiting practical high-resolution recordings.

Mini-laparotomy with Adjunctive Care versus Laparoscopy for Placement of Gastric Electrical Stimulation

We compared outcomes for two gastric electrical stimulation placement strategies, mini-laparotomy with adjunctive care (MLAC) versus laparoscopy without adjunctive care (LAPA). For electrode placement, the peritoneal cavity was accessed with either a single 2.5 to 3.0 cm midline incision (MLAC) or three trocar incisions (LAPA). For both groups, generator was placed subcutaneously over the anterior rectus sheath. For MLAC, adjunctive pain control measures were used for placement of both electrode and generator (transversus abdominus plane block). For LAPA, those that could not be completed by laparoscopy were converted to traditional open approach and kept in the analysis. MLAC (n = 128) resulted in shorter operative times than LAPA (n = 37) (median operative time: 87.5 vs 137.0 minutes, P ≤ 0.01). Hospital length of stay was also shorter for MLAC than for LAPA (median: 2.0 vs 3.0 days, P ≤ 0.01) without any increase in readmission rates to the hospital within 30 days of discharge (11.0 vs 16.2%, P = 0.39). After equalizing learning curves, these differences were even greater (median operative time: 84.5 vs 137.0 minutes, P < 0.01; median length of stay: 1.0 vs 3.0 days; P < 0.01) without increasing 30-day read-mission rates (9.1 vs 16.2%, P = 0.25). For implantation of gastric electrical stimulators, mini-laparotomy can result in improved outcomes when coupled with adjunctive pain control measures.

Gastric Pacing in a Child with Severe Gastroparesis and Review of the Literature

Gastroparesis is a disorder characterised by symptoms of and evidence for gastric retention in the absence of mechanical obstruction. Symptoms include nausea and vomiting, early satiety, postprandial fullness, regurgitation and abdominal pain. Common causes of gastroparesis are diabetes, post-surgical and idiopathic. In some patients, gastroparesis can be very severe and refractory to medical therapy including anti-emetics, anti-reflux and pro-kinetic medications. Gastric electrical stimulation represents a novel treatment for severe gastroparesis by regulating gastric electrical dysfunction with a neurostimulator. In adult studies, vomiting frequency has been reduced by up to 81% from baseline. We report a case of a 13-year-old girl with life-long severe idiopathic gastroparesis who was successfully treated by gastric pacing.

Gastric electrical stimulation for the treatment of diabetic gastroparesis

Diabetic gastroparesis is a component of autonomic neuropathy, and is the most common manifestation of gastrointestinal neuropathy. Diabetes is responsible for about one quarter of gastroparesis. The upper gastrointestinal symptoms are often non-specific and dominated by nausea, vomiting, early satiety, fullness, bloating. We also have to look for diabetic gastroparesis in case of metabolic instability, such as postprandial hypoglycaemia. The pathophysiology of diabetic gastroparesis is complex, partly due to a vagus nerve damage, but also to changes in secretion of hormones such as motilin and ghrelin. A decrease in the stem cell factor (SCF), growth factor for cells of Cajal (gastric pacemaker), was found in subjects with diabetic gastroparesis. These abnormalities lead to an excessive relaxation in the corpus, a hypomotility of antrum, a desynchronization antrum-duodenum-pylorus, and finally an abnormal duodenal motility. The treatment of diabetic gastroparesis is based on diabetes control, and split meals by reducing the fiber content and fat from the diet. The antiemetic and prokinetic agents should be tested primarily in people with nausea and vomiting. Finally, after failure of conventional measures, the use of gastric neuromodulation is an effective alternative, with well-defined indications. Introduced in the 1970s, this technology works by applying electrical stimulation continues at the gastric antrum, particularly in patients whose gastric symptoms are refractory to other therapies. Its efficacy has been recently reported in different causes of gastroparesis, especially in diabetes. Gastric emptying based on gastric scintigraphy, gastrointestinal symptoms, biological markers of glycaemic control and quality of life are partly improved, but not normalized. Finally, a heavy nutritional care is sometimes necessary in the most severe forms. The enteral route should be preferred (nasojejunal and jejunostomy if possible efficiency). However, in case of failure especially in patients with small bowel neuropathy, the long-term parenteral nutrition is sometimes required.

Treatment of high-frequency gastric electrical stimulation for gastroparesis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The aim of this study was to assess the effects of gastric electrical stimulation (GES) on symptoms and gastric emptying in patients with gastroparesis, and the effects of GES on the three subgroups of gastroparesis.

METHODS

A literature search of clinical trials using high-frequency GES to treat patients with gastroparesis from January 1995 to January 2011 was performed. Data on the total symptom severity score (TSS), nausea severity score, vomiting severity score, and gastric emptying were extracted and analyzed. The statistic effect index was weighted mean differences.

RESULTS

Ten studies (n = 601) were included in this study. In the comparison to baseline, there was significant improvement of symptoms and gastric emptying (P < 0.00001). It was noted that GES significantly improved both TSS (P < 0.00001) and gastric retention at 2 h (P = 0.003) and 4 h (P < 0.0001) in patients with diabetic gastroparesis (DG), while gastric retention at 2 h (P = 0.18) in idiopathic gastroparesis (IG) patients, and gastric retention at 4 h (P = 0.23) in postsurgical gastroparesis (PSG) patients, did not reach significance.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on this meta-analysis, the substantial and significant improvement of symptoms and gastric emptying, and the good safety we observed, indicate that high-frequency GES is an effective and safe method for treating refractory gastroparesis. DG patients seem the most responsive to GES, both subjectively and objectively, while the IG and PSG subgroups are less responsive and need further research.

Motility disorders in the patient with neurologic disease

Gastrointestinal symptoms are common in the patient with chronic neurologic disease and may loom large in terms of impact on quality of life and on nutrition and mobility. A knowledge of the range of gastrointestinal disorders associated with a given neurologic disease, together with an understanding of the risks and benefits of various therapeutic options and approaches, should aid gastroenterologists in their efforts to contribute to the care of these patients. In most instances a multidisciplinary team (neurologist/neurosurgeon, gastroenterologist, nutritionist, therapist, specialist nurse) aware of the wishes and needs of the family and their carers and mindful of the nature and the natural history of the underlying disease process are best placed to assess and manage these problems.

Gastric electrical stimulation for gastroparesis: a goal greatly pursued, but not yet attained

The lack of an effective medical treatment for gastroparesis has pushed the research of new techniques of gastric electrical stimulation (GES) for nearly half a century of experimentation with a large variety of electrical stimuli delivered to the gastric wall of animals and patients with gastroparesis. Three principal methods are currently available: gastric low-frequency/high-energy GES with long pulse stimulation, high-frequency/low-energy GES with short pulse stimulation and neural sequential GES. The first method aims to reset a regular slow wave rhythm, but has variable effects on contractions and requires devices with large and heavy batteries unsuitable for implantation. High-frequency/low-energy GES, although inadequate to restore a normal gastric electro-mechanical activity, improves dyspeptic symptoms, such as nausea and vomiting, giving patients a better quality of life together with a more satisfactory nutritional status and is suitable for implantation. Unfortunately, the numerous clinical studies using this type of GES, with the exception of two, were not controlled and there is a need for definitive verification of the effectiveness of this technique to justify the cost and the risks of this procedure. The last method, which is neural sequential GES, consists of a microprocessor-controlled sequential activation of a series of annular electrodes along the distal two thirds of the stomach and is able to induce propagated contractions causing forceful emptying of the gastric content. The latter method is the most promising, but has been used only in animals and needs to be tested in patients with gastroparesis before it is regarded as a solution for this disease.

Cellular effects of gastric electrical stimulation on antral smooth muscle cells in rats

The cellular effects of gastric electrical stimulation (GES), which has recently been introduced as a potential therapy for the treatment of gastroparesis and obesity, were investigated in rat antrum smooth muscle cells (SMCs). Effects on cell membrane potentials of single electrical current pulses (pulse width from 0.1 ms to 200 ms) and 2-s pulse train stimuli with different pulse widths (0.1–4 ms), different frequencies (20–200 Hz), and different intensities were studied: 1) the stimulus amplitude had an exponential relationship to the pulse width from 2 ms to 200 ms, along with a rapidly rising strength-duration curve at pulse widths less than 5 ms, and a relatively flat curve at pulse widths greater than 50 ms; 2) when the pulse frequency was at 80 Hz or above, pulse train electrical stimulation, with a pulse width of 2 ms or above but not ≤1 ms, was able to depolarize cell membrane potentials to above −30 mV and/or generate action potentials. Electrical stimulation with a single long pulse and a width of 50 ms or greater is effective in depolarizing cell membrane potentials of SMCs with low amplitude. Pulse train electrical stimulation with a pulse width of ≤1 ms fails to generate action potentials in SMCs, whereas pulse train electrical stimulation with a pulse width of 2–4 ms and a sufficiently high pulse frequency is able to generate action potentials. These cellular findings may be useful in optimizing stimulation parameters of GES.

A novel classification scheme for gastroparesis based on predominant-symptom presentation

AIM

Symptoms of gastroparesis are very diverse. Classifying patients by predominant symptom may improve management strategy.

GOAL

To validate a new symptom-predominant classification for gastroparesis using symptom severity and quality-of-life measures.

STUDY

Subjects with gastroparesis for >2 months were prospectively enrolled. A physician classified each subject into one of the following: vomiting-predominant, dyspepsia-predominant, or regurgitation-predominant gastroparesis. Subjects also classified themselves independently from the physician. Each subject completed a Patient Assessment of Gastrointestinal Disorders-Symptom Severity Index (PAGI-SYM) and SF-12v2 Health-Related Quality-Of-Life survey. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed with sensitivity and specificity of each PAGI-SYM subscale to differentiate subjects into symptom-predominant subgroups. Area under the curve (AUC) was used to compare the receiver operating characteristic curves. Analysis of variance, Cohen's kappa (kappa) statistic, student t test, and Pearson correlation (r) were used.

RESULTS

One hundred subjects (87 females, mean 48 y) were enrolled. There was a 78% concordance between physician and subject's classification of gastroparesis with substantial correlation (kappa=0.64). PAGI-SYM nausea/vomiting subscale (AUC=0.79) and PAGI-SYM heartburn/regurgitation subscale (AUC=0.73) were the best in differentiating subjects into vomiting-predominant and regurgitation-predominant gastroparesis, respectively. No subscale was adequate to differentiate dyspepsia-predominant gastroparesis. SF-12v2 total scores significantly correlated with worsening of the total PAGI-SYM scores (r=-0.339 to -0.600, all P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

There was a substantial agreement between physician and patient using a symptom-predominant gastroparesis classification. Results suggest that a predominant-symptom classification is a valid means to categorize subjects with vomiting-predominant and regurgitation-predominant gastroparesis. Patients with dyspepsia and delayed gastric emptying need further research.

Loss of interstitial cells of Cajal network in severe idiopathic gastroparesis

AIM: To report a case of severe idiopathic gastroparesis in complete absence of Kit-positive gastric interstitial cells of Cajal (ICC).

METHODS: Gastric tissue from a patient with severe idiopathic gastroparesis unresponsive to medical treatment and requiring surgery was analyzed by conventional histology and immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS: Gastric pacemaker cells expressing Kit receptor had completely disappeared while the local level of stem cell factor, the essential ligand for its development and maintenance, was increased. No signs of cell death were observed in the pacemaker region.

CONCLUSION: These results are consistent with the hypothesis that a lack of Kit expression may lead to impaired functioning of ICC. Total gastrectomy proves to be curative.

[Gastric emptying and functional dyspepsia]

Dyspeptic syndrome includes symptoms such as upper abdominal pain, nausea and/or vomiting. These symptoms are common to highly diverse processes such as duodenal ulcer, pancreatitis and even intestinal ischemia, among many others. However, most patients who consult for this syndrome do not have any of these well known processes. New mechanisms have been proposed that could explain the symptoms presented by these patients. Among these mechanisms are those relating to an alteration of normal gastroduodenal motor function, such as alterations of gastric compliance, antral distension, gastric accommodation to anomalous ingestion, and alterations of gastric emptying. The present review evaluates the role of gastric emptying in producing dyspeptic symptoms according to the evidence available to date. We discuss gastric emptying in patients with functional or idiopathic dyspepsia compared with that in the healthy population, the correlation between gastric emptying and dyspeptic symptoms, and the response of dyspeptic symptoms to the prokinetic therapies carried out to date.

Gastric electrical stimulation in gastroparesis: where do we stand?

Gastroparesis is a chronic disabling condition of impaired gastric motility that results in decreased quality of life. Currently available medical therapy consists of prokinetic and/or antiemetic therapy, dietary modifications, and nutritional supplementation. For patients with medication-resistant gastroparesis a non-pharmacological therapy, gastric electric stimulation, has evolved over the last decade. Based on the frequency of the electrical stimulus, gastric electric stimulation can be classified into low- and high-frequency gastric electric stimulation. The first method aims to normalize gastric dysrhythmia and entrain gastric slow waves and accelerates gastric emptying, whereas high-frequency gastric electric stimulation is unable to restore normal gastric emptying, but nevertheless stunningly reduces symptoms, such as nausea and vomiting, re-establishes quality of life, nutritional state in all patients, and metabolic control in patients with diabetic gastroparesis. Gastric electric stimulation presents a new possibility in the treatment of gastroparesis.

Electrical stimulation for gastroparesis

BACKGROUND

Gastroparesis is a disabling, and sometimes fatal, disease that often does not respond to medical treatment. This single-surgeon prospective study examines the safety and 6-month efficacy of electrical stimulation for the treatment of gastroparesis.

METHODS

Sixteen patients with medically refractory gastroparesis underwent laparoscopic implantation of an electrical stimulator device (Enterra Therapy, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) consisting of a subcutaneous stimulator and two gastric wall leads. Gastric emptying scans (GES) confirmed the diagnosis of gastroparesis. Patients were evaluated preoperatively using a self-administered GI symptomatology questionnaire and RAND 36 Health Survey. Once patients were >6-months from implantation, a repeat GES was obtained and patients completed a postoperative GI symptomatology questionnaire and RAND 36 Health Survey. Ten of 16 patients in this case series were >6-months from implantation. One was lost to follow-up. An F-test was used to establish equality of standard deviations between the 16 patients evaluated preoperatively and the subset of 10 patients evaluated postoperatively. A Student's t-test was used to evaluate the significance of differences in pre- and postoperative results.

RESULTS

Average operating time was 117 min with no intraoperative complications. The majority of patients were discharged on postoperative day 1. There were two complications in the postoperative period. Patients experienced a significant decrease in nausea and vomiting as measured by the GI symptomatology questionnaire. Half of all patients no longer required gastric prokinetic medications and there was a subjective reduction of pyrosis, early satiety, and epigastric pain. A significant increase in quality of life as measured by the RAND 36 Health Survey was seen, and six of eight patients no longer demonstrated gastroparesis on GES.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic implantation of an electrical stimulation device is a safe and effective treatment by subjective and objective standards for the management of medically refractory gastroparesis.

Chronic gastric electrical stimulation for gastroparesis reduces the use of prokinetic and/or antiemetic medications and the need for hospitalizations

To investigate the effect of chronic gastric electrical stimulation (GES) on the daily use of prokinetics and antiemetics, hospitalizations, total symptom score (TSS), SF-36 status for health-related quality of life (HQOL), and gastric emptying of a solid meal, we evaluated 37 gastroparetic patients preoperatively and 1 year after undergoing GES implant. Prokinetic and antiemetic use was significantly reduced. Of 27 patients on at least one prokinetic at baseline, 8 were off at 1 year. Twenty-six patients requiring antiemetics before surgery decreased to 17. Mean TSS was significantly reduced and the reduction for patients off medications was significantly better than for patients still on medications. Overall SF-36 scores for HQOL were significantly improved, and patients off antiemetics had a significantly higher HQOL score than for patients on antiemetics at 1 year. Hospitalizations decreased from 50 +/- 10 days for the year prior to GES therapy to 14 +/- 3 days (P < 0.05). However, gastric emptying was not significantly improved. Conclusions are as follows. (1) Chronic GES significantly reduced the use of prokinetic/antiemetic medications and the need for hospitalization in gastropraretic patients, whose clinical and quality of life outcomes also significantly improved. (2) These data provide evidence of the positive economic impact of this new therapy on long-term clinical outcomes in gastroparetic patients not responding to standard medical therapy.

Electrogastrography: basic knowledge, recording, processing and its clinical applications

The slow wave (SW) of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract mainly functions to trigger the onset of spike to elicit smooth muscle contraction, which provides the essential power of motility. Smooth muscle myogenic control activity or SW is believed to originate in the interstitial cells of Cajal (ICC). The electrical coupling promotes interaction between muscle cells, and ICC additionally contribute to SW rhythmicity. Stomach SW originates in the proximal body showing the continuous rhythmic change in the membrane potential and propagates normally to the distal antrum with a regular rhythm of approximately 3 c.p.m. A technique using electrodes positioned on the abdominal skin to pick up stomach rhythmic SW refers to electrogastrography (EGG). The stomach SW amplitude is very weak, while many visceral organs also produce rhythmic electricities, for example heartbeat, respiration, other organs of the GI tract and even body movements. Thus noise other than SW should be filtered out during the recording, while motion artifacts are visually examined and deleted. Finally, the best signal among all recordings is selected to compute EGG parameters based on spectral analysis. The latter is done not only to tranform frequency domain to time domain but also to provide information of time variability in frequency. Obtained EGG parameters include dominant frequency/power, % normal rhythm, % bradygastria, % tachygastria, instability coefficient and power ratio. Clinical experience in EGG has been markedly accumulated since its rapid evolution. In contrast, lack of standardized methodology in terms of electrode positions, recording periods, test meals, analytic software and normal reference values makes the significance of EGG recording controversial. Unlike imaging or manometrical studies, stomach motility disorders are not diagnosed based only on abnormal EGG parameters. Limitations of EGG recording, processing, computation, acceptable normal parameters, technique and reading should be known to conduct subjective assessments when EGG is used to resolve stomach dysfunction. Understanding basic SW physiology, recording methodology and indications may open EGG as a new domain to approach the stomach motor dysfunction.

Temporary gastric electrical stimulation with orally or PEG-placed electrodes in patients with drug refractory gastroparesis

BACKGROUND

Gastric electrical stimulation (GES) has been shown to be efficacious for drug refractory gastroparesis, but GES requires surgery. Placement of temporary GES electrodes endoscopically (ENDOstim) or via a PEG (PEGstim) is feasible, thereby allowing rapid assessment and comparison of temporary use (TEMP) with permanent (PERM) implantation.

METHODS

Twenty consecutive patients with gastroparesis had TEMP electrodes placed (6 ENDOstim, 14 PEGstim). TEMP alone and TEMP vs. PERM placement of GES devices in 13 of 20 patients were compared via the following: average vomiting frequency score (VFS), total symptom score, days to symptom improvement, electrode impedance, and gastric emptying test.

RESULTS

For patients receiving TEMP, GES demonstrated a rapid, significant, and sustained improvement in VFS, results similar to those for PERM.

CONCLUSIONS

Both ENDO and PEG placement of GES electrodes are safe and effective in patients with gastroparesis, with outcomes that correspond to those achieved with permanent GES implantation.

Clinical response to gastric electrical stimulation in patients with postsurgical gastroparesis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The aim of this study was to report the long-term clinical response to high-frequency gastric electrical stimulation (GES) in 16 patients with postsurgical gastroparesis who failed standard medical therapy.

METHODS

Clinical data collected at baseline and after 6 and 12 months of GES included (1) severity and frequency of 6 upper gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms by using a 5-point symptom interview questionnaire and total symptom score, (2) health-related quality of life including physical composite score and mental composite score, (3) 4-hour standardized gastric emptying of a solid meal by scintigraphy, and (4) nutritional status.

RESULTS

The severity and frequency of all 6 upper GI symptoms, total symptom score, physical composite score, and mental composite score were significantly improved after 6 months and sustained at 12 months ( P < .05). All patients had delayed gastric emptying at baseline. Gastric emptying was not significantly faster at 12 months, although 3 normalized. At implantation, 7 of 16 patients required nutritional support with a feeding jejunostomy tube; after GES, 4 were able to discontinue jejunal feeding. The mean number of hospitalization days was significantly reduced by a mean 25 days compared with the prior year. One patient had the device removed after 12 months because of infection around the pulse generator.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term GES significantly improved upper GI symptoms, quality of life, the nutritional status, and hospitalization requirements of patients with postsurgical gastroparesis. Although vagal nerve damage or disruption was part of the underlying pathophysiology, GES therapy was still effective and is a potential treatment option for the long-term management of postsurgical gastroparesis. A controlled clinical trial of GES for PSG patients (who are refractory to medical therapy) is indicated given these encouraging results.

Effect of high-frequency gastric electrical stimulation on gastric myoelectric activity in gastroparetic patients

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of gastric electrical stimulation (GES) on gastric myoelectric activity (GMA) and to identify possible mechanisms that could help explain how high-frequency GES is effective in treating nausea and vomiting associated with gastroparesis. Fifteen gastroparetic patients who received high-frequency GES were enrolled. Two pairs of temporary pacing wires were implanted on the serosa of the stomach along the greater curvature during surgery for placement of the permanent stimulation device. Two-channel serosal recordings of GMA before and during GES were measured. A gastric emptying test and severity of nausea and vomiting were assessed at baseline and at 3 months of GES. Power spectral and cross correlation analyses revealed that impaired propagation of slow waves (50%), tachygastria (30%) and abnormal myoelectric responses to a meal (50%) were the main abnormalities observed at baseline. GES with a high frequency significantly enhanced the slow wave amplitude and propagation velocity, and resulted in a significant improvement in nausea and vomiting but did not entrain the gastric slow wave or improve gastric emptying after 3 months of GES.

Idiopathic and Diabetic Gastroparesis

The management of both diabetic and idiopathic gastroparesis often represents a substantial clinical challenge. In formulating recommendations for therapy, it should be recognized that these are based on less than optimal evidence; in particular, there are substantial deficiencies in current knowledge relating to the pathophysiology of gastroparesis, as well as the natural history of gastrointestinal symptoms, and the majority of pharmacologic trials have been short term and associated with methodologic limitations. Although the etiologic factors differ, the overall management principles are similar in the two conditions. Maintenance of adequate nutrition is pivotal, and parenteral nutrition may be required in severe cases associated with malnutrition. In patients with diabetes, rigorous attempts should be made to optimize glycemic control--hyperglycemia slows gastric emptying and may exacerbate symptoms and attenuate the effects of prokinetic drugs. Despite the relatively poor predictive value of symptoms, it is reasonable to suggest a trial of prokinetic therapy for about 4 weeks, rather than initially establishing the diagnosis by measurement of gastric emptying. However, it should be recognized that there is a substantial placebo response, a lack of evidence to support the cost effectiveness of such an approach, and that most patients will require prolonged therapy. In type 1 diabetic patients, prokinetic therapy may potentially benefit glycemic control, and this forms an additional rationale (albeit not established) for therapy. Some patients with diabetes and idiopathic gastroparesis with severe vomiting are unable to tolerate oral medication; in such cases subcutaneous metoclopramide may prove useful. Patients with intractable symptoms should be hospitalized and given intravenous erythromycin. The repertoire of prokinetic agents available in the United States is limited and includes metoclopramide, erythromycin, and cisapride (available by special program from its manufacturer); all of these drugs are associated with side effects. The use of metoclopramide may represent the first choice for chronic oral therapy, although it has been studied less comprehensively than cisapride. Combination therapy may be potentially more efficacious than the use of single agents. Dehydration and metabolic derangements should be corrected. The choice of chronic medical therapy should be individualized, taking factors such as age, presence of diabetes, concurrent medications, and comorbidities into account. In a small number of patients in whom medical treatment fails, surgery should be considered, and, if performed, done in a specialized center. A number of novel therapies, including gastric electrical stimulation, are currently being evaluated.

Interstitial Cells in the Musculature of the Gastrointestinal Tract: Cajal and Beyond

Expression of the receptor tyrosine kinase KIT on cells referred to as interstitial cells of Cajal (ICC) has been instrumental during the past decade in the tremendous interest in cells in the interstitium of the smooth muscle layers of the digestive tract. ICC generate the pacemaker component (electrical slow waves of depolarization) of the smooth musculature and are involved in neurotransmission. By integration of ICC functions, substantial progress has been made in our understanding of the neuromuscular control of gastrointestinal motility, opening novel therapeutic perspectives. In this article, the ultrastructure and light microscopic morphology, as well as the functions and the development of ICC and of neighboring fibroblast-like cells (FLC), are critically reviewed. Directions for future research are considered and a unifying concept of mesenchymal cells, either KIT positive (the "ICC") or KIT negative "non-Cajal" (including the FLC and possibly also other cell types) cell types in the interstitium of the smooth musculature of the gastrointestinal tract, is proposed. Furthermore, evidence is accumulating to suggest that, as postulated by Santiago Ramon y Cajal, the concept of interstitial cells is not likely to be restricted to the gastrointestinal musculature.

The "electrical way" to cure gastroparesis

The treatment of gastroparesis recently received a heavy blow from the restrictions on the use of the prokinetic drug cisapride, but, fortunately, at the same time, a nonpharmacological approach, such as gastric electrical stimulation, came up again with new techniques. After an ultra-decennial experimentation with a large variety of electrical stimuli delivered to the gastric wall of animals and patients with gastroparesis, three principal methods are available at the moment: gastric electrical pacing, high-frequency gastric electrical stimulation, and sequential neural electrical stimulation. The first method aims to reset a regular slow-wave rhythm, but is unable to re-establish efficient contractions and a normal gastric emptying. High-frequency gastric electrical stimulation, although inadequate to restore a normal gastric emptying, nevertheless strikingly improves the dyspeptic symptoms, such as nausea and vomiting, giving the patients a better quality of life and a more satisfactory nutritional status. The last method, neural electrical gastric stimulation, consists of a microprocessor-controlled sequential activation of a series of annular electrodes which encircle the distal two thirds of the stomach and induce propagated contractions causing a forceful emptying of the gastric content. The latter method is the most promising, but it has so far only been tested in animals and would need to be tested in patients with gastroparesis before it can be used as a solution for this disease. All the aforementioned clinical studies, however, are not controlled and nearly all were published in abstract form. Therefore, further controlled trials are needed to establish which of these techniques is more useful for the treatment of gastroparesis.

Gastric emptying in diabetes: clinical significance and treatment

The outcome of recent studies has led to redefinition of concepts relating to the prevalence, pathogenesis and clinical significance of disordered gastric emptying in patients with diabetes mellitus. The use of scintigraphic techniques has established that gastric emptying is abnormally slow in approx. 30-50% of outpatients with long-standing Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes, although the magnitude of this delay is modest in many cases. Upper gastrointestinal symptoms occur frequently and affect quality of life adversely in patients with diabetes, although the relationship between symptoms and the rate of gastric emptying is weak. Acute changes in blood glucose concentration affect both gastric motor function and upper gastrointestinal symptoms. Gastric emptying is slower during hyperglycaemia when compared with euglycaemia and accelerated during hypoglycaemia. The blood glucose concentration may influence the response to prokinetic drugs. Conversely, the rate of gastric emptying is a major determinant of post-prandial glycaemic excursions in healthy subjects, as well as in Type 1 and Type 2 patients. A number of therapies currently in development are designed to improve post-prandial glycaemic control by modulating the rate of delivery of nutrients to the small intestine.

Pharmacotherapy of gastroparesis

The evaluation and management of gastric motor dysfunction continues to represent a significant clinical challenge. The very definition of what constitutes a clinically relevant disturbance of gastric motility remains unclear. The spectrum of gastroparesis extends from those with classical symptoms and severe delay of gastric emptying to those with dyspepsia and a mild delay in emptying rate. Indeed, for many patients with dyspepsia, the role of gastric emptying delay in the pathogenesis of symptoms, remains unclear. Any assessment of the efficacy of any therapeutic class in gastroparesis must be mindful, therefore, of these variations in definition. For those individuals with severe established gastroparesis, therapeutic success often remains elusive and i.v. erythromycin and oral dopamine antagonists, or substituted benzamides, remain the best options for acute severe exacerbations and chronic maintenance therapy, respectively. Alternatives, currently under investigation, include a number of 5-HT4 agonists, macrolides devoid of antibiotic activity, CCK antagonists and gastric electrical stimulation. Other novel approaches include strategies to address some of the regional abnormalities in gastric motor function that have been identified in some patients with dyspepsia.

Gastric myoelectrical activity and gastric emptying in patients with functional dyspepsia

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to investigate gastric myoelectrical activity and gastric emptying (GE) and their relationship in patients with functional dyspepsia.

METHODS

The study was conducted in 15 healthy volunteers (six women, nine men, mean age: 42 yr) and 15 patients (13 women, two men, mean age: 43 yr) with functional dyspepsia. Gastric myoelectrical activity was recorded using cutaneous electrogastrography (EGG) for 30 min in the fasting state and for 120 min simultaneously with GE monitoring after an isotope-labeled solid meal. The anterior/posterior images of the stomach were taken using a technetium scanner immediately after eating, and then at 1, 2, and 4 h to determine the percentage of gastric retention. The dominant frequency of the EGG, the change of the postprandial EGG peak power (deltaP), and the percentage of normal 2-4 cycles/min (cpm) slow waves during each recording session were calculated and compared between the patients and healthy subjects.

RESULTS

The patients had a significantly lower mean percentage of 2-4 cpm slow waves, both in the fed state and in the fasting state, than did healthy subjects. Compared to the EGG in the fasting state, a significant increase of the EGG dominant frequency in the fed state was observed in healthy subjects but not in the patients. The mean postprandial EGG power increase in the patients was substantially less than in the healthy subjects during the first postprandial hour but similar during the second postprandial hour. The mean percentage of gastric retention in patients is substantially higher than in the healthy subjects, both at 2 h after eating and at 4 h after eating. Of 15 patients, nine (60%) had delayed GE (gastric retention at 2 h >50%) and 10 (66%) had abnormal EGGs (percentage of 2-4 cpm <70% and/or deltaP < 0). Eight of these 10 patients (80%) with abnormal EGGs had delayed GE.

CONCLUSIONS

A high proportion of adult patients (60%) with functional dyspepsia have abnormally slow GE and abnormalities in gastric myoelectrical activity.

Chronic Intestinal Pseudo-obstruction

For many patients, nutritional support and relief of symptoms remain the primary management goal of pseudo-obstruction. Specific pharmacological agents for this disorder are, in general, lacking. Given that the efficacy of many of the individual available agents is far from excellent, several centers have turned to combination therapy. Though there is at present no evidence from controlled studies to support this strategy, it is, at the very least, theoretically attractive as these agents act through a number of separate mechanisms. The combination of a prokinetic and an emetic may prove especially useful. As the pseudo-obstruction syndromes are, individually, rare, and experience with any given prokinetic agent in these disorders limited, it is difficult to develop strict guidelines for their use in this context. It stands to reason that a response to a prokinetic agent would seem unlikely in a patient with an advanced myopathic process; anecdotal evidence suggests, however, that some patients with severe scleroderma may derive some symptomatic improvement. Where oral therapy is tolerated, cisapride would appear the best choice among available agents. When this fails, subcutaneous octreotide may be added or substituted. In the acute situation, intravenous erythromycin may alleviate gastroparesis, but probably exerts little beneficial effect beyond the pylorus; parenteral metoclopramide may be tried, but, here again, convincing evidence of efficacy is lacking. The roles of endoscopy and surgery are largely confined to facilitating nutrition and providing decompression.