Management of upper cervical spine fractures in elderly patients: current trends and outcomes

Increased incidence of traumatic spinal injury in patients aged 65 years and older in the Netherlands

PURPOSE

The global population is ageing rapidly. As a result, an increasing number of older patients with traumatic spine injuries are seen in hospitals worldwide. However, it is unknown how the incidence of traumatic spinal injury has developed over the past decade. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the incidence and characteristics of traumatic spinal injury in patients aged under and above 65 years.

METHODS

During three time periods: 2009-2010, 2014-2015 and 2019-2020, all adult patients with traumatic spinal injury in the Netherlands were identified from the Dutch National Trauma Registry. Patient-related characteristics and 1-year mortality were collected from a subgroup of patients treated at a level-1 trauma centre, and patients aged ≥ 65 years were compared to patients aged < 65 years.

RESULTS

In the Dutch National Trauma Registry 25,737 patients with traumatic spinal injury were identified. The incidence of spine injury in patients > 65 years was 49.5/100,000/yr in 2009-2010, 68.8 in 2014-2015 and 65.9 in 2019-2020. The percentage of patients ≥ 65 years increased from 37% in 2009-2010, to 43% in 2014-2015, and to 47% in 2019-2020. In the subgroup of 1054 patients treated in a level-1 trauma centre, a similar increasing incidence was seen in patients aged ≥ 65 years. In these patients low energy falls were the most common trauma mechanism and the cervical spine was the most commonly injured region. Moreover, patients ≥ 65 years had significantly higher 1-year mortality compared with patients aged < 65 years, 22.7% versus 9.2%.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of traumatic spinal injury in older patients in the Netherlands has increased over the last 12 years. Almost half of the patients with traumatic spinal injury are currently aged ≥ 65 years. The increasing incidence and the high 1-year mortality highlight the need to modify existing treatment protocols for these patients.

Long-term outcomes after surgery for subaxial cervical spine injuries in octogenarians, a matched population-based cohort study

PURPOSE

We aimed to investigate surgical outcomes in octogenarians with subaxial cervical spine injuries and determine the predictors of complications and mortality.

METHODS

Eligible for inclusion were all patients surgically treated between 2006 and 2018, with either anterior or posterior fixation for subaxial spine injuries. A cohort of octogenarians was identified and matched 1:1 to a corresponding cohort of younger adults. Primary outcomes were perioperative complications and mortality.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients were included in each of the octogenarian and younger groups (median age: 84.0 vs. 38.5). While the risks for surgical complications, including dural tears and wound infections, were similar between groups, the risks of postoperative medical complications, including respiratory or urinary tract infections, were significantly higher among the elderly (p < 0.05). Additionally, there were no differences in operative time (p = 0.625) or estimated blood loss (p = 0.403) between groups. The 30 and 90-day mortality rates were significantly higher among the elderly (p = 0.004 and p < 0.001). These differences were due to comorbidities in the octogenarian cohort as they were revoked when propensity score matching was performed to account for the differences in American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) grade. Multivariable logistic regression revealed age and ASA score to be independent predictors of complications and the 90-day mortality, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Octogenarians with comorbidities were more susceptible to postoperative complications, explaining the increased short-term mortality in this group. However, octogenarians without comorbidities had similar outcomes compared to the younger patients, indicating that overall health, including comorbidities, rather than chronological age should be considered in surgical decision-making.

Monoaxial Screws Versus Polyaxial Screws Osteosynthesis for Unstable Atlas Fractures: A Retrospective, Comparative Study With a Minimum Follow-Up of 3 years

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to compare the radiological parameters, clinical outcomes, and long-term effects of the posterior osteosynthesis with polyaxial screw-rod system and the monoaxial screw-rod system in the treatment of unstable atlas fractures.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 33 patients with posterior ORIF for unstable atlas fractures in our hospital from August 2013 to June 2020, with a minimum of 3 years of follow-up. Polyaxial screws (group A) were used in 12 patients and monoaxial screws (group B) in 21 patients. Perioperative data, radiological parameters, and clinical outcomes were collected and compared between the 2 surgical approaches.

RESULTS

The operative time, blood loss, time of screw-rod system placement, and hospital stay were significantly lower in group A than in group B. At the last follow-up, the visual analog scale (VAS) score and anterior arch reduction rate of the atlas in group A were lower than those in group B, while the lateral mass displacement (LMD) in group A was higher than that in group B. There was no significant difference between Group A and Group B in terms of the anterior atlantodental interval (AADI), posterior arch reduction rate of the atlas, range of motion (ROM), and neck disability index (NDI).

CONCLUSIONS

Monoaxial screws can achieve better reduction results for unstable atlas fractures, especially for the anterior arch of atlas. However, the surgical operation of monoaxial screws is more complicated than that of polyaxial screws and has more complications. Appropriate implants should be selected for the treatment of unstable atlas fractures based on the type of atlas fracture, the experience of surgeons, and the demands of patients.

Design of a novel lateral mass screw-plate system for the treatment of unstable atlas fractures: a finite element analysis

BACKGROUND

Osteosynthesis of unstable atlas fractures preserves joint motion and therefore has a distinct advantage over a range of treatment procedures. To prevent the potential disadvantages associated with osteosynthesis, a new atlas lateral mass screw-plate (LMSP) system has been designed. However, the biomechanical role of using the LMSP system in atlas internal fixation is not known. The aim of this study was to compare the biomechanical stability of a new LMSP with traditional posterior screw and rod (PSR) fixation techniques on the occipitocervical junction (C0-C2) through finite element analysis.

METHODS

A nonlinear C0-C2 finite element model of the intact upper cervical spine was developed and validated. The unstable model using the PSR system was then compared with the model using the LMSP system for fixation. A vertical load of 40 N was applied to the C0 to simulate head weight, while a torque of 1.5 Nm was applied to the C0 to simulate flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation.

RESULTS

The range of motion of both systems was close to the intact model. Compared with the LMSP system model, the PSR system model increased flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation by 4.9%, 3.0%, 5.0%, and 29.5% in the C0-C1 segments, and 4.9%, 2.7%, 2.4%, and 22.6% in the C1-C2, respectively. In flexion, extension, and lateral bending motion, the LMSP system model exhibited similar stress to the PSR system model, while in axial rotation, the PSR system model exhibited higher stress.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of our study indicate that the two tested system models provide comparable stability. However, better stability was achieved during axial rotation with the LMSP system, and in this system, the maximum von Mises stress was less than that of the PSR one. As the atlantoaxial joint functions primarily as a rotational joint, the use of the LMSP system may provide a more stable environment for the joint that has become unstable due to fracture.

Atlas fractures with and without simultaneous dens fractures differ with respect to clinical, demographic, and management characteristics

Background

Patients with simultaneous fractures of the atlas and dens have traditionally been managed according to the dens fracture's morphology, but data supporting this practice are limited.

Methods

We retrospectively examined all patients with traumatic atlas fractures at our institution between 2008 and 2016. We used multivariable regression and propensity score matching to compare the presentation, management, and outcomes of patients with isolated atlas fractures to patients with simultaneous atlas-dens fractures.

Results

Ninety-nine patients were identified. Patients with isolated atlas fractures were younger (61 ± 22 vs. 77 ± 14, P = 0.0003), had lower median Charlson Comorbidity Index (3 vs. 5, P = 0.0005), had better presenting Nurick myelopathy scores (0 vs. 3, P < 0.0001), and had different mechanisms of injury (P = 0.0011). Multivariable regression showed that having a simultaneous atlas-dens fracture was independently associated with older age (odds ratio [OR] =1.59 [1.22, 2.07], P = 0.001), worse presenting myelopathy (OR = 3.10 [2.04, 4.16], P < 0.001), and selection for surgery (OR = 4.91 [1.10, 21.97], P = 0.037). Propensity score matching yielded balanced populations (Rubin's B = 23.3, Rubin's R = 1.96) and showed that the risk of atlas fracture nonunion was no different among isolated atlas fractures compared to simultaneous atlas-dens fractures (P = 0.304). Age was the only variable independently associated with atlas fracture nonunion (OR = 2.39 [1.15, 5.00], P = 0.020), having a simultaneous atlas-dens fracture was not significant (P = 0.2829).

Conclusions

Among patients with atlas fractures, simultaneous fractures of the dens occur in older patients and confer an increased risk of myelopathy and requiring surgical stabilization. Controlling for confounders, the risk of atlas fracture nonunion is equivalent for isolated atlas fractures versus simultaneous atlas-dens fractures.

Regional variations in C1-C2 bone density on quantitated computed tomography and clinical implications

Background

Our elderly population is growing and the number of spine fractures in the elderly is also growing. The elderly population in general may be considered as poor surgical candidates experience a high rate of fractures at C1 and C2 compared with the general population. Nonoperative management of upper cervical fractures is not benign as there is a high nonunion rate for both C1 and C2 fractures in the elderly, and orthosis compliance is often suboptimal, or complicated by skin breakdown. The optimal technique for upper cervical stabilization in the elderly may be different than in younger populations as the bone quality is inferior in the elderly. The objective of this basic science study is to determine whether the bone mineral density (BMD) of C1 and C2 vary by region, and if this is a gender difference in this elderly age group.

Methods

Twenty cadaveric spines from 45 to 83 years of age were used to obtain BMD using quantitated computed tomography (QCT). BMD was measured using a QCT. For C1, 8 regions were determined: anterior tubercle, bilateral anterior and medial lateral masses, bilateral posterior arches, and posterior tubercle. For C2, 7 regional BMDs were determined: top of odontoid, base of odontoid-body interface, mid body, bilateral lateral masses, anterior inferior body near the discs space, and the C2 spinous process.

Results

The BMD was greatest at the C1 anterior tubercle (564.4±175.8 mg/cm³) and C1 posterior ring (420.8±110.2 mg/cm³), and least at the anterior and medial lateral masses (262.8±59.5 mg/cm³, 316.9±72.6 mg/cm³). At C2 QCT BMD was greatest at the top of the dens (400.6±107.9 mg/cm³) decreasing down through the odontoid-C2 body junction (267.8±103.5 mg/cm³) and least in the mid C2 body 249.1±68.8 mg/cm³). The posterior arch of C1 and the spinous process of C2 had higher BMD's 420.8±110.2 mg/cm³ and 284.1±93.0 mg/cm³, respectively. A high correlation was observed between the BMD at the interface of the dens-vertebral body with the vertebral body with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.86. The BMD of the top of dens was significantly higher (p<.05) than all the regions in C2.

Conclusions

Regional and segmental BMD variations at C1 and C2 have clinical implications for surgical constructs in the elderly population. Given the higher BMDs of the C1 and C2 spinous process and posterior arches, consideration should be given to incorporate these areas using various C1-C2 wiring techniques. In the elderly, lateral masses particularly at C1 with lower BMD may result in potential screw loosening and nonunion in this age group. Old-school wiring techniques have a track record of efficacy and safety with less blood loss, reduced operative time, reduced X-ray exposure, and should be considered in the elderly as a primary stabilization technique or a belt-over suspenders approach based on regional variations in BMD in the elderly.

Geriatric Odontoid Fractures: Treatment Algorithms of the German Society for Orthopaedics and Trauma Based on Expert Consensus and a Systematic Review

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review/expert consensus.

OBJECTIVES

Fractures of the axis represent the most frequent injury of the spine in elderly patients. Both, operative and non-operative treatment are associated with a high rate of complications and mortality. The aim of this article was to summarize the current literature on the management of odontoid fractures in geriatric patients and to weigh it based on an expert consensus process.

METHODS

In a joint consensus process, members of the Spine Section of the German Orthopaedic and Trauma Society (DGOU) aimed to formulate recommendations for the diagnostic workup and treatment of odontoid fractures in geriatric patients. Based on the previously published recommendations, this article is an updated version with incorporating a systematic review of the recent literature.

RESULTS

Based on the new data available, the recommendations established in the initial consensus process were adapted.

CONCLUSIONS

Computed tomography represents the diagnostic standard for patients with suspected injuries of the upper cervical spine. Anderson/D'Alonzo odontoid fractures type 1, non-displaced type 2, and type 3 can be treated conservatively. Even non-unions do not necessarily result in poor clinical outcome. In Anderson/D'Alonzo type 2 fractures, surgical therapy offers the advantage of relatively safe osseous healing with no increased complication rate even in elderly patients and can thus be recommended. In very high aged patients, however, a case-by-case decision should be made. When surgical stabilization of osteoporotic odontoid fractures is indicated, posterior techniques are biomechanically advantageous and can be considered the standard.

Factors contributing to a longer length of stay in adults admitted to a quaternary spinal care center

BACKGROUND

Longer hospital length of stay (LOS) has been associated with worse outcomes and increased resource utilization. However, diagnostic and patient-level factors associated with LOS have not been well studied on a large scale. The goal was to identify patient, surgical and organizational factors associated with longer patient LOS for adult patients at a high-volume quaternary spinal care center.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of 13,493 admissions from January 2006 to December 2019. Factors analyzed included age, sex, admission status (emergent vs scheduled), ASIA grade, operative vs non-operative management, mean blood loss, operative time, and adverse events. Specific adverse events included surgical site infection (SSI), other infection (systemic or UTI), neuropathic pain, delirium, dural tear, pneumonia, and dysphagia. Diagnostic categories included trauma, oncology, deformity, degenerative, and "other". A multivariable linear regression model was fit to log-transformed LOS to determine independent factors associated with patient LOS, with effects expressed as multipliers on mean LOS.

RESULTS

Mean LOS for the population (SD) was 15.8 (34.0) days. Factors significantly (p < 0.05) associated with longer LOS were advanced patient age [multiplier on mean LOS 1.011/year (95% CI: 1.007-1.015)], emergency admission [multiplier on mean LOS 1.615 (95% CI: 1.337-1.951)], ASIA grade [multiplier on mean LOS 1.125/grade (95% CI: 1.051-1.205)], operative management [multiplier on mean LOS 1.211 (95% CI: 1.006-1.459)], and the occurrence of one or more AEs [multiplier on mean LOS 2.613 (95% CI: 2.188-3.121)]. Significant AEs included postoperative SSI [multiplier on mean LOS 1.749 (95% CI: 1.250-2.449)], other infections (systemic infections and UTI combined) [multiplier on mean LOS 1.650 (95% CI: 1.359-2.004)], delirium [multiplier on mean LOS 1.404 (95% CI: 1.103-1.787)], and pneumonia [multiplier on mean LOS 1.883 (95% CI: 1.447-2.451)]. Among the diagnostic categories explored, degenerative patients experienced significantly shorter LOS [multiplier on mean LOS 0.672 (95%CI: 0.535-0.844), p < 0.001] compared to non-degenerative categories.

CONCLUSION

This large-scale study taking into account diagnostic categories identified several factors associated with patient LOS. Future interventions should target modifiable factors to minimize LOS and guide hospital resource allocation thereby improving patient outcomes and quality of care and decreasing healthcare-associated costs.

Risk Factors for Early Mortality in Older Patients with Traumatic Cervical Spine Injuries-A Multicenter Retrospective Study of 1512 Cases

For older patients with decreased reserve function, traumatic cervical spine injuries frequently lead to early mortality. However, the prognostic factors for early mortality remain unclear. This study included patients aged ≥65 years and hospitalized for treatment of traumatic cervical spine injuries in 78 hospitals between 2010 and 2020. Early mortality was defined as death within 90 days after injury. We evaluated the relationship between early mortality and the following factors: age, sex, body mass index, history of drinking and smoking, injury mechanisms, presence of a cervical spine fracture and dislocation, cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament, diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis, American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale, concomitant injury, pre-existing comorbidities, steroid administration, and treatment plan. Overall, 1512 patients (mean age, 75.8 ± 6.9 years) were included in the study. The early mortality rate was 4.0%. Multivariate analysis identified older age (OR = 1.1, p < 0.001), male sex (OR = 3.7, p = 0.009), cervical spine fracture (OR = 4.2, p < 0.001), complete motor paralysis (OR = 8.4, p < 0.001), and chronic kidney disease (OR = 5.3, p < 0.001) as risk factors for early mortality. Older age, male sex, cervical spine fracture, complete motor paralysis, and chronic kidney disease are prognostic factors for early mortality in older patients with traumatic cervical spine injuries.

Severe dysphagia after a posterior cervical spine fusion at the C1–C3 level and its improvement after correction surgery for malalignment: a case report

Background

The development of dysphagia and trismus following posterior C1–C3 fusion is rare compared to occipitocervical fusion, and there are very few reports in the literature.

Case presentation

A 75-year-old Thai man who had an extradural tumor at the C1/C2 level developed severe dysphagia and trismus immediately after tumor resection and C1–C3 fusion. During the surgery for malalignment correction, the C1–C2 screws were re-aligned into an increased lordotic position. The symptoms resolved immediately post-surgery.

Conclusions

Short upper cervical fusion can produce trismus and dysphagia in a relatively flexed position. Preoperative planning should be individualized based on the patient’s resting neutral alignment to prevent complications.

Risk Factors for Fracture Nonunion and Transverse Atlantal Ligament Injury After Isolated Atlas Fractures: A Case Series of 97 Patients

BACKGROUND

The management of atlas fractures is controversial and hinges on the integrity of transverse atlantal ligament (TAL).

OBJECTIVE

To identify risk factors for atlas fracture nonunion, with and without TAL injury.

METHODS

All isolated, traumatic atlas fractures treated at our institution between 1999 and 2016 were analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify variables associated with TAL injury confirmed on MRI, occult TAL injury seen on MRI but not suspected on computed tomography (CT), and with fracture nonunion on follow-up CT at 12 weeks.

RESULTS

Lateral mass displacement (LMD) ≥ 7 mm had a 48.2% sensitivity, 98.3% specificity, and 82.6% accuracy for identifying TAL injury. MRI-confirmed TAL injury was independently associated with LMD > 7 mm ( P = .004) and atlanto-dental interval ( P = .039), and occult TAL injury was associated with atlanto-dental interval ( P = .019). Halo immobilization was associated with having a Gehweiler type 3 fracture ( P = .020), a high-risk injury mechanism ( P = .023), and an 18.1% complication rate. Thirteen patients with TAL injury on MRI and/or LMD ≥ 7 mm were treated with a cervical collar only, and 11 patients (84.6%) healed at 12 weeks. Nonunion rates at 12 weeks were equivalent between halo (11.1%) and cervical collar (12.5%). Only age independently predicted nonunion at 12 weeks ( P = .026).

CONCLUSION

LMD > 7 mm on CT is not sensitive for TAL injury. Some atlas fractures with TAL injury can be managed with a cervical collar. Nonunion rates are not different between halo immobilization and cervical collar, but a strong selection bias precludes directly comparing the efficacy of these modalities. Age independently predicts nonunion.

Mortality related to and functional outcomes of upper cervical spine fractures in the elderly

BACKGROUND

Although the mortality related to hip fracture and osteoporotic vertebral fracture have been reported, few studies have examined the mortality related to atlas and/or axis fractures. The aim of this study was to assess the association between mortality and atlas and/or axis fractures retrospectively and to elucidate the efficacy of surgical treatment.

METHODS

A total of 33 elderly patients who were treated for atlas and/or axis fractures at our institution between January 2012 and December 2018 were included in this study. These patients were divided into two groups: surgical treatment and conservative treatment. Fracture types, comorbidities, neurological status, treatment types, and walking ability at follow-up were reviewed. Mortality was assessed using medical records or via phone interviews.

RESULTS

The mean age at injury was 79.9 ± 8.0 years, and the mean follow-up period was 2.3 years. The overall mortality rates at 1 and 5 years were 21.4% and 48.4%, respectively. During the observation period, 12 (36%) patients died. Twenty-two patients were treated conservatively (14 were treated with a cervical collar, 8 were treated with a halo vest). Surgical procedures included occipital-cervical fixation, osteosynthesis of C2 fractures, C1-2 fixation, and C1-4 fixation using a posterior approach. Surgical treatment correlated with better survival rates. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of ambulatory ability and functional recovery.

CONCLUSION

Upper cervical spine fractures appear to have a worse prognosis compared to hip and osteoporotic vertebral fractures. This study indicates the efficacy of surgical treatment for upper cervical spine fractures in the elderly for improving survival prognosis.

Surgical Management of Type II Displaced Dens Fractures Improves One-year Mortality in Elderly Patients

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cross-sectional analysis of US national data collected by PearlDiver Inc. database.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the rates of surgical/nonsurgical treatments and associated one-year mortality for displaced type II dens fractures without neurological deficit.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Existing literature on dens fractures includes small series of patients with highly variable surgical rates. These studies contain insufficient data to determine the benefits of surgical or nonsurgical treatment as surgeon bias in treatment and selection of patients have significant effects on the results.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Displaced type II dens fractures and upper cervical surgeries were identified using their respective International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) diagnosis and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. Inclusion criteria included patients older than 65, diagnosed with a displaced type II dens fracture, absent neurological damage, during the years 2015 to 2018. Age, sex, ICD-10 diagnosis codes, CPT codes, displacement type, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index scores were obtained through the PearlDiver database. Patient-related variables and one-year mortality associated with surgical versus nonsurgical treatment were compared using univariate χ 2 analysis, odds ratios, and multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Among the 5300 patients who met our inclusion criteria, 59% (n=3108) were female, the mean age was 76.6 (±3.9) years old, and the average Elixhauser Comorbidity Index was 7.1 (±4.0). Only 8.3% (n=437) had surgical treatment for the displaced dens fracture. Multivariate logistic regression analysis for one-year mortality showed surgery was associated with decreased one-year mortality in all patients ( z =-6.26; P <0.001), patients between the ages of 65 and 74 ( z =-2.53; P =0.012), and patients over the age of 75 ( z =-5.81; P <0.001).

CONCLUSION

Despite surgery improving survival in elderly patients with type II dens fractures, surgical management is rarely pursued. Factors that independently increase the likelihood of surgery include younger age, male sex, and posterior displacement.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Management of C2 odontoid peg fragility fractures - A UK survey of spinal surgeons

PURPOSE

Patients sustaining fragility fractures of the C2 odontoid peg have 30-day mortality rates as high as 10% rising up to 34.1% at 1 year. Substantial controversy exists regarding optimal management of these fractures and there is a lack of national guidance to inform best practice. The aim of this study was to determine current practice in the management of these fractures throughout the United Kingdom.

METHODS

A UK wide, cross sectional survey was conducted, asking 10 questions regarding the initial management, imaging and follow-up of an elderly patient with a type 2 fragility odontoid peg fracture. This was publicised through the British Orthopaedic Association website and sent to all members of the Society of British Neurological Surgeons (SBNS) via email.

RESULTS

107 Responses were received. 56% from orthopaedic consultants, 29% from neurosurgical consultants and 15% from senior spine fellows. 86% (92) of respondents choose treatment with a cervical orthosis, with 84% (77) of these opting for a semi rigid Aspen or Philadelphia collar compared to 16% (15) opting for a soft cervical collar. Three (3%) opted for operative intervention with a further three (3%) choosing Halo fixation. Nine respondents (8%) opted for no orthosis and treatment with analgesia alone. Length of immobilisation in cervical orthosis ranged from 6 to 12 weeks. Initial follow-up ranged from 1 week to 6 weeks, with 6% (6) discharged without follow up. There was also marked variation in the use of follow-up imaging with 17% (18) using plain radiographs, 62% (66) requesting lateral flexion / extension radiographs, 10% (11) using CT and 11% (12) not performing any imaging at final follow up. In 60% (64) of cases respondents did not change subsequent management as a result of imaging.

CONCLUSION

Type-2 fragility peg fractures have high morbidity and mortality. There is marked variation in the treatment modalities used, follow-up regime and use of imaging throughout the UK. Given the rapidly increasing incidence of these injuries and the associated mortality this should be a high priority field for further research. Further large scale studies are urgently required to inform best practice and standardise management of these injuries.

[Early intraoperative and postoperative complications of C1-C2 fixation using the Goel-Harms technique : How often? Which? Why?]

Fractures of the axis are among the most frequent spinal injuries. Posterior C1-C2 fixation according to Goel-Harms is an accepted alternative to the more traditional procedures: initial stability has been shown and there is a wide range of indications but there is a paucity of data on possible complications. Such knowledge, however, is essential in order to improve outcomes.Thus, the aim of the study was:1. to describe the frequency, type and severity of early postoperative complications following C1-C2 fixation according to Goel-Harms,2. to investigate whether there is a correlation between frequency and severity of complications,3. to detect risk factors for complications.Patients included in this study were treated surgically using the C1-C2 fixation according to Goel-Harms between March 2011 and July 2018. Data were taken from our hospital database and checked via OPS 10 code "S12.1". We analyzed age, sex, ASA score, blood loss, operating time and complications. These data were extracted from clinical data sheets.A total of 134 patients were detected, 54% female, mean age 75 years and mean ASA score 3. There were 122 complications. All these complications were observed in 50% of the patients. These were mainly minor complications (32%), and 18% severe complications. Mortality was 2%. We found that patients with more severe complications also had significantly more complications when compared to patients with minor complications (Fisher's exact test, p = 0.001). Preoperative ASA score was the only risk factor to significantly influence the number (p = 0.001) and severity (p = 0.002) of postoperative complications. Each increase of the preoperative ASA score increased the risk to get one more complication by a factor of 2.55 (odds ratio 2.55) and increased the risk to get a severe complication by a factor of 2.43 (odds ratio 2.43). Intraoperative blood loss, patient age and duration of surgery, however, were not identified as risk factors for complications.

Surgical treatment for cervical spine injury in nonagenarians: A report of three cases

Among the elderly, even minor injuries can cause cervical spine fractures. With the increasing number of nonagenarians, the opportunities for treatment of cervical spine injuries in nonagenarians are getting to be more common. Conservative therapy is often chosen in nonagenarians with cervical spine injuries because of high risk associated with surgical treatment; however, we present herein the cases of three patients in nonagenarians who underwent surgical treatment for cervical spine injury. After a fall, three cases of nonagenarians who lived alone and independent were diagnosed with a Jefferson fracture and minor dislocated type II odontoid fracture, a C4 fracture with diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis, and a fracture-dislocation of C2, respectively. Their past medical history included several diseases, but we decided that spine surgery under general anesthesia was acceptable based on their pre-injury condition. We performed posterior fixation for all cases. As a result, while two patients developed postoperative minor complications, all cases showed favorable postoperative courses. They acquired independent or partially assisted walking and were transferred to the hospital for rehabilitation. If fundamental activity of daily living and general condition permit, posterior fixation seems to be a good choice even in nonagenarians.

Emergency management of older people with cervical spine injuries: an expert practice review

Spinal fractures are the third most common traumatic injury in older people, of which cervical spine injuries make up around 15%. They are predominantly seen in people living with frailty who fall from standing height. Spinal fractures in this patient group are associated with substantial morbidity and mortality (over 40% at 1 year). For many older people who survive, their injuries will be life changing. Practice between EDs varies significantly, with no universally accepted guidelines on either assessment, investigation or management specific to older people experiencing trauma. This expert practice review examines the current evidence and emergency management options in this patient group through clinical scenarios, with the aim of providing a more unified approach to management.

Risk Factors Associated with 90-day Readmissions Following Odontoid Fractures: A Nationwide Readmissions Database Study

STUDY DESIGN

Nationwide Readmissions Database Study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate readmission rates and factors related to readmission after surgical and nonsurgical management of odontoid fractures.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Management of odontoid fractures, which are the most common isolated spine fracture in the elderly, continues to be debated. The choice between surgical or nonsurgical treatment has been reported to impact mortality and might influence readmission rates. Hospital readmissions represent a large financial burden upon our healthcare system. Factors surrounding hospital readmissions would benefit from a better understanding of their associated causes to lower health care costs.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed using the 2016 Healthcare Utilization Project (HCUP) Nationwide Readmission Database (NRD). Demographic information and factors associated with readmission were collected. Readmission rates, complications, length of hospital stay were collected. Patients treated operatively, nonoperatively, and patients who were readmitted or not readmitted were compared. Statistical analysis was performed using open source software SciPy (Python v1.3.0) for all analyses.

RESULTS

We identified 2921 patients who presented with Type II dens fractures from January 1, 2016 to September 30, 2016, 555 of which underwent surgical intervention. The readmission rate in patients who underwent surgery was 16.4% (91/555) and 29.4% (696/2366) in the nonoperative group. Hospital costs for readmitted and nonreadmitted patients were $353,704 and $174,922, and $197,099 and $80,715 for nonoperatively managed patients, respectively. Medicaid and Medicare patients had the highest readmission rate in both groups. Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidity indices were significantly higher in patients who were readmitted (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

We report an overall 90-day readmission rate of 16.4% and 29.4%, in operative and nonoperative management of type II odontoid fractures, respectively. In the face of a rising incidence of this fracture in the elderly population, an understanding of the comorbidities and age-related demographics associated with 90-day readmissions following both surgical and nonsurgical treatment are critical.Level of Evidence: 3.

Halo vest immobilization - an institutional review of safety in acute cervical spine injury from 2013 to 2017

Objective: Halo vest immobilization (HVI) remains an important treatment option for occipital-cervical injuries. It provides the surgeon with a safe and effective medical treatment options for challenging patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of HVI in these patients.Methods: This retrospective study identified adult patients treated with Halo vests immobilization (HVI) for acute cervical spine injury at our metropolitan level 1 trauma center from 2013 to 2017. This heterogenous cohort included 67 consecutive patients with acute cervical spine injury secondary to trauma or iatrogenic injury following surgical intervention with a mean age of 52 and a mean injury severity score (ISS) of 18. Forty-six percent of patients were treated with HVI as an adjunct therapy to surgical fixation (both short- and long-term immobilization), 45% of patients were treated with HVI as a primary medical treatment, and 9% of patients were treated with HVI instead of failed conservative medical treatment, such as cervical braces. Results: Pneumonia during the initial hospital stay was the most common complication (25%), followed by the correction of loose pins (22%) and pin site infections (18%). Overall, 51% of patients experienced at least one of these complications. There were significant associations between low initial GCS scores and the development of pneumonia (p < 0.001), high ISS scores and the development of pneumonia (p < 0.01), and duration of HVI and the occurrence of loose pins (p < 0.05). Four patients initially treated with HVI as primary medical treatment was converted to surgical treatment due to an intolerance of HVI or non-healing injuries.Conclusions:The HVI is a safe and effective treatment modality in a subset of patients with complex cervical junction and subaxial cervical spine pathology.

[Neurosurgical treatment of cervical spine injuries]

BACKGROUND

Injuries of the cervical spine are quite common with an incidence of more than 3% in trauma patients. The incidence is even higher in elderly patients. Cervical spine injuries might induce severe neurological deficits. Therefore, they must be quickly and adequately diagnosed and treated. Depending on the pattern of injury, conservative or surgical treatment is indicated.

OBJECTIVE

The authors describe the different surgical strategies and treatment options based on the pattern of injury. Typical surgical methods are illustrated by case presentations.

CONCLUSION

Cervical spine injuries should be treated in a trauma centre with extensive expertise in spine surgery. The immobilisation and gentle transportation is important already at the scene of the accident. Nowadays, there are excellent surgical options and strategies available as well as excellent intensive care therapy. These possibilities lead to rapid and good stabilisation of cervical spine injuries and the posttraumatic morbidity and mortality can be reduced significantly especially in elderly patients.

Geriatric clinical screening tool for cervical spine injury after ground-level falls

BACKGROUND

A consistent approach to cervical spine injury (CSI) clearance for patients 65 and older remains a challenge. Clinical clearance algorithms like the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilisation Study (NEXUS) criteria have variable accuracy and the Canadian C-spine rule excludes older patients. Routine CT of the cervical spine is performed to rule out CSI but at an increased cost and low yield. Herein, we aimed to identify predictive clinical variables to selectively screen older patients for CSI.

METHODS

The University of Iowa's trauma registry was interrogated to retrospectively identify all patients 65 years and older who presented with trauma from a ground-level fall from January 2012 to July 2017. The relationship between predictive variables (demographics, NEXUS criteria and distracting injuries) and presence of CSI was examined using the generalised linear modelling (GLM) framework. A training set was used to build the statistical models to identify clinical variables that can be used to predict CSI and a validation set was used to assess the reliability and consistency of the model coefficients estimated from the training set.

RESULTS

Overall, 2312 patients ≥65 admitted for ground-level falls were identified; 253 (10.9%) patients had a CSI. Using the GLM framework, the best predictive model for CSI included midline tenderness, focal neurological deficit and signs of trauma to the head/face, with midline tenderness highly predictive of CSI (OR=22.961 (15.178-34.737); p<0.001). The negative predictive value (NPV) for this model was 95.1% (93.9%-96.3%). In the absence of midline tenderness, the best model included focal neurological deficit (OR=2.601 (1.340-5.049); p=0.005) and signs of trauma to the head/face (OR=3.024 (1.898-4.815); p<0.001). The NPV was 94.3% (93.1%-95.5%).

CONCLUSION

Midline tenderness, focal neurological deficit and signs of trauma to the head/face were significant in this older population. The absence of all three variables indicates lower likelihood of CSI for patients≥65. Future observational studies are warranted to prospectively validate this model.

C1-C2 Injury: Factors influencing mortality, outcome, and fracture healing

BACKGROUND

C1-C2 injury represents 25-40% of cervical injuries and predominantly occurs in the geriatric population.

METHODS

A prospective multicentre study was conducted under the aegis of the french spine surgery society (SFCR) investigating the impact of age, comorbidities, lesion type, and treatment option on mortality, complications, and fusion rates.

RESULTS

A total of 417 patients were recruited from 11 participating centres. The mean ± SD age was 66.6 ± 22 years, and there were 228 men (55%); 5.4% presented a neurological deficit at initial presentation. The most frequent traumatic lesion was C2 fracture (n = 308). Overall mortality was 8.4%; it was 2.3% among those aged ≤ 60 years, 5.0% 61-80 years, and 16.0% > 80 years (p < 0.001). Regarding complications, 17.8% of patients ≤ 70 years of age presented with ≥ 1 complication versus 32.3% > 70 years (p = 0.0009). The type of fracture did not condition the onset of complications and/or mortality (p > 0.05). The presence of a comorbidity was associated with a risk factor for both death (p = 0.0001) and general complication (p = 0.008). Age and comorbidities were found to be independently associated with death (p < 0.005). The frequency of pseudoarthrosis ranged from 0 to 12.5% up to 70 years of age and then constantly and progressively increased to reach 58.6% after 90 years of age.

CONCLUSIONS

C1-C2 injury represents a serious concern, possibly life-threatening, especially in the elderly. We found a major impact of age and comorbidities on mortality, complications, and pseudarthrosis; injury pattern or treatment option seem to have a minimal effect.

Management of Atlantoaxial Instability Due to a Pathological Fracture of the Axis

Metastases to the upper cervical spine are uncommon, and subsequent instability is rare. We report the details of a patient with metastatic breast cancer to the axis manifesting as a pathologic fracture and C1/C2 instability. This was treated by preoperative reduction to appropriate alignment with use of crown halo traction, followed by posterior occipitocervical fusion and postoperative radiation therapy. 

Treatment strategy of unstable atlas fracture: A retrospective study of 21 patients

At present, the posterior cervical approach with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) remains a commonly effective treatment for unstable Atlas fracture. However, the inserted screws into the C1 lateral mass of some unstable atlas fracture are very difficult, so that the operation is forced to change into C0 to C2 fusion. In order to improve the successful rate of lateral mass screw placement, we introduced a method of fixing lateral mass with a towel clamp in posterior transpedicular fixation, and explore the efficacy and feasibility.Twenty-one consecutive patients with unstable atlas fracture were treated via this method from October 2012 to July 2017. All cases had neck pain and restricted motion of neck movement on admission. Electronic medical records and pre- and postoperative radiographs were reviewed. Screw and rod placement, bone fusion, and spinal cord integrity were assessed via long-term follow-up with anteroposterior and lateral radiographs and computed tomography. Follow-up included clinical assessment of neurological function, assessment of pain using the visual analog scale (VAS), and assessment of the activities of daily living using the neck disability index (NDI).The mean follow-up duration was 22.1 months (range: 12-54 months). No screw loosening or breakage, plate displacement, neurovascular injury, and severe complications occurred during follow-up. The mean operative time was 112.4 ± 14.9 min (range: 82-135 min), and mean blood loss was 386.2 ± 147.9 mL (range: 210-850 mL). One patient experienced continuous neck pain postoperatively, but this gradually disappeared with analgesic administration. At final follow-up, all patients had bone fusion, the VAS scores and NDI were significantly improved compared with preoperatively.Fixing the C1 lateral mass with a towel clamp during posterior transpedicular fixation for unstable atlas fracture appears to be a safe and reliable method, with the advantages of being a simple technique with few complications.

Comparative Propensity-Weighted Mortality After Isolated Acute Traumatic Axis Fractures in Older Adults

INTRODUCTION

In older patients with axis fractures, the survival benefit from surgery is unclear due to high baseline mortality. Comparative effectiveness research can provide evidence from population level cohorts. Propensity weighting is the preferred methodology for reducing bias when analyzing national administrative cohort data for these purposes but has not yet been utilized for this important surgical conundrum. We estimate the effect of surgery on mortality after isolated acute traumatic axis fracture in older adults.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We used a retrospective population-based cohort of Medicare patients and generated a propensity score-weighted nonsurgical cohort and compared mortality with and without surgery. This balanced the comorbid conditions of the treatment groups. Incident fractures were defined using a predetermined algorithm based on enrollment, code timing, and billing location. The primary outcome was adjusted all-cause 1-year mortality.

RESULTS

From 12 372 beneficiaries with 1-year continuous enrollment and a coded axis fracture, 2676 patients met final inclusion/exclusion criteria. Estimated incidence was 16.5 per 100 000 person-years overall in 2014 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 15.0-18.0) and was stable from 2008 through 2014. Patients with axis fracture had a mean age of 82.8 years, 30.2% were male, and 91.9% were Caucasian. Mortality was 3.8 times higher (CI 3.6-4.1) compared with the general population of older US adults. Propensity-weighted mortality at 1 year for nonsurgical patients was 26.7 of 100 (CI: 24.5-29.0). Mortality for surgical patients was significantly lower (19.7/100; CI 14.5-25.0). Risk difference was 7.0 fewer surgical deaths per 100 patients (CI: 1.3-12.7). Surgical patients aged 65 to 74 years had the largest difference in mortality with 11.2 fewer deaths per 100 (CI: 1.1-21.3).

DISCUSSION

Patients with axis fractures are predominantly older Caucasian women and have a higher mortality rate than the general population. Propensity-weighted mortality at 1-year was lower in the surgical patients with the largest risk difference occurring in patients 65 to 74 years old.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery may provide an independent survival benefit in patients aged 65 to 75 years, and the mortality difference diminishes thereafter.

Epidemiology and management of atlas fractures

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to gain new insights into the epidemiologic characteristics of patients with atlas fractures and to retrospectively evaluate complication rates after surgical and non-surgical treatment.

METHODS

In a retrospective study, consecutive patients diagnosed with a fracture of the atlas between 01/2008 and 07/2018 were analyzed. Data on epidemiology, concomitant injuries, fracture patterns and complications were obtained by chart and imaging review.

RESULTS

In total, 189 patients (mean age 72 years, SD 19; 57.1% male) were treated. The most frequent trauma mechanism was a low-energy trauma (59.8%). A concomitant injury of the cervical spine was found in 59.8%, a combined C1/C2 injury in 56.6% and a concomitant fracture of the thoraco-lumbar spine in 15.4%. When classified according to Gehweiler, there were: 23.3% type 1, 22.2% type 2, 32.8% type 3, 19.0% type 4 and 1.1% type 5. Treatment of isolated atlas fractures (n = 67) consisted of non-operative management in 67.1%, halo fixation in 6.0% and open surgical treatment in 26.9%. In patients with combined injuries, the therapy was essentially dictated by the concomitant subaxial cervical injuries.

CONCLUSIONS

Atlas fractures occurred mainly in elderly people and in the majority of the cases were associated with other injuries of the head and spine. Most atlas fractures were treated conservatively. However, surgical treatment has become a safe and valid option in unstable fracture patterns involving the anterior and posterior arch (type 3) or those involving the articular surfaces (type 4).

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV (Retrospective cohort study). These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Does isolated atlantoaxial fusion result in better clinical outcome compared to occipitocervical fusion?

BACKGROUND

The C0 to C2 region is the keystone for range of motion in the upper cervical spine. Posterior procedures usually include a fusion of at least one segment. Atlantoaxial fusion (AAF) only inhibits any motion in the C1/C2 segment whereas occipitocervical fusion (OCF) additionally interferes with the C0/C1 segment. The purpose of our study was to investigate clinical outcome of patients that underwent OCF or AAF for upper cervical spine injuries.

METHODS

Over a 5-year period (2010-2015), consecutive patients with upper cervical spine disorders were retrospectively identified as having been treated with OCF or AAF. The Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) and the Neck Disability Index (NDI) were used to evaluate postoperative neck pain and health restrictions. Demographics, follow-up, and clinical outcome parameters were evaluated. Infection, hematoma, screw malpositioning, and deaths were used as complication variables. Follow-up was at least 6 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Ninety-six patients (male = 42, female = 54) underwent stabilization of the upper cervical spine. OCF was performed in 44 patients (45.8%), and 52 patients (54.2%) were treated with AAF. Patients with OCF were diagnosed with more comorbidities (p = 0.01). Follow-up was shorter in the OCF group compared to the AAF group (6.3 months and 14.3 months; p = 0.01). No differences were found related to infection (OCF 4.5%; AAF 7.7%) and revision rate (OCF 13.6%; AAF 17.3%; p > 0.05). Regarding bother and disability, no differences were discovered utilizing the NDI score (AAF 21.4%; OCF 37.4%; p > 0.05). A reduction of disability measured by the NDI was observed with greater follow-up for all patients (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Theoretically, AAF provides greater range of motion by preserving the C0/C1 motion segment resulting in less disability. The current study did not show any significant differences regarding clinical outcome measured by the NDI compared to OCF. No differences were found regarding complication and infection rates in both groups. Both techniques provide a stable treatment with comparable clinical outcome.

Association Between Frailty Status and Odontoid Fractures After Traumatic Falls: Investigation of Varying Injury Mechanisms Among 70 Elderly Odontoid Fracture Patients

OBJECTIVES

To determine significant associations between patient frailty status and odontoid fractures across common traumatic mechanisms of injuries (MOIs) in the elderly.

DESIGN

Retrospective review.

SETTING

Single, academic-affiliated hospital with full surgical services.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Patients 65 years or older with traumatic odontoid fractures were included.

INTERVENTION

Nonoperative management (soft/hard collar, halo, traction tongs, and Minerva) and/or operative fixation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Modified frailty index (mFI), MOI, concurrent injuries, inpatient length of stay (LOS), reoperation, and mortality rates.

RESULTS

Seventy patients were included (80.6 ± 8.5 years, 60% F, 88% European, 10% Maori/Pacific, 1.4% Asian, Charlson Comorbidity Index 5.3 ± 2.2, mFI 0.21 ± 0.15). The most common MOIs were falls (74.3%), high-speed motor vehicle accidents (MVAs) (17.1%), low-speed MVAs (5.7%), and pedestrian versus car (2.9%). Patients with traumatic falls exhibited significantly higher mFI scores (0.25) compared with low-speed MVAs (0.16), high-speed MVAs (0.08), and pedestrian versus car (0.01) (P = 0.003). Twenty-seven patients with odontoid fractures were frail, 33 were prefrail, and 10 were robust. Ninety-two percent of frail patients had a traumatic fall as their MOI, as opposed to 73% of prefrail and 30% of robust patients (P < 0.001). Prefrail and frail patients were 4.3 times more likely than robust patients to present with odontoid fractures through traumatic fall [odds ratio (OR): 4.33 (1.47-12.75), P = 0.008], and frailty increased likelihood of reoperation [OR: 4.2 (1.2-14.75), P = 0.025] and extended LOS [OR: 5.71 (1.05-10.37), P = 0.017]. Frail patients had the highest 30-day (P = 0.017) and 1-year mortality (P < 0.001) compared with other groups.

CONCLUSION

Patients with traumatic odontoid fractures from falls were significantly more frail in comparison with any other MOIs, with worse short- and long-term outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Recommendations for Diagnosis and Treatment of Odontoid Fractures in Geriatric Patients

BACKGROUND

Odontoid fractures in geriatric patients represent an entity of increasing incidence with a high rate of morbidity and mortality. The optimal diagnostic and therapeutic management is being controversially discussed in the literature.

METHODS

In a consensus process and based on the current literature, the members of the working groups "Osteoporotic Fractures" and "Upper Cervical Spine" of the German Society for Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery (DGOU) defined recommendations for the diagnostics and treatment of odontoid fractures in geriatric patients.

RESULTS

For the diagnosis of odontoid fractures in symptomatic patients, computed tomography represents the gold standard, along with conventional radiographs. Magnetic resonance and dynamic imaging can be used as ancillary imaging modalities. With regard to fracture classification, the systems described by Anderson/D'Alonzo and by Eysel/Roosen have proved to be of value. A treatment algorithm was developed based on these classifications. Anderson/D'Alonzo type 1, type 3, and non-displaced type 2 fractures usually can be treated non-operatively. However, a close clinical and radiological follow-up is essential. In Anderson/D'Alonzo type 2 fractures, operative treatment is associated with better fracture healing. Displaced type 2 and type 3 fractures should be stabilized operatively. Type 2 fractures with suitable fracture patterns (Eysel/Roosen 2A/B) can be stabilized anteriorly. Posterior C I/II-stabilization procedures are well established and suitable for all fracture patterns.

Odontoid Fractures: A Critical Review of Current Management and Future Directions

Odontoid fractures represent one of the most common and controversial injury types affecting the cervical spine, being associated with a high incidence of nonunion, morbidity, and mortality. These complications are especially common and important in elderly patients, for which ideal treatment options are still under debate. Stable fractures in young patients maybe treated conservatively, with immobilization. Although halo-vest has been widely used for their conservative management, studies have shown high rates of complications in the elderly, and therefore current evidence suggests that the conservative management of these fractures should be carried out with a hard cervical collar or cervicothoracic orthosis. Elderly patients with stable fractures have been reported to have better clinical results with surgical treatment. For these and for all patients with unstable fractures, several surgical techniques have been proposed. Anterior odontoid fixation can be used in reducible fractures with ideal fracture patterns, with older patients requiring fixation with 2 screws. In other cases, C1-C2 posterior fixation maybe needed with the best surgical option depending on the reducibility of the fracture and vertebral artery anatomy. In this paper, current evidence on the management of odontoid fractures is discussed, and an algorithm for treatment is proposed.

[Cervical spine injuries in the elderly patient]

Studies have shown that the numbers of injuries of the cervical spine increase in elderly patients. An early clinical examination and adequate diagnostics are necessary to initiate the appropriate treatment. A computed tomography (CT) scan is recommended to exclude injuries of the cervical spine. Dynamic fluoroscopy and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can additionally be helpful to detect instabilities. The treatment of the injury depends on the extent of the fracture and includes conservative treatment options with soft or rigid ortheses for cervical spine immobilization, retention with a halo fixator or open/closed reduction and fixation. In the selection of treatment it should be taken into consideration that the use of rigid immobilization or a halo fixator is associated with a significant reduction of the quality of life. In the region of the upper cervical spine only unstable fractures of the atlas and of the axis should be operatively treated. In the region of the subaxial cervical spine fractures are prone to be unstable due to the lack of flexibility of the cervical spine in elderly patients. Therefore, fractures of types B and C according to AO Spine, for which operative treatment is recommended, are regularely seen. In addition, a pre-existing stenosis of the spinal cord may lead to neurological symptoms which negatively influence the clinical outcome.

Posterior occiput-cervical fixation for metastasis to upper cervical spine

Background:

Metastasis to craniocervical area may result in instability manifesting as disabling pain, cranial nerve dysfunction, paralysis, or even death. Stabilization is required to prevent complications. Nonoperative treatment modalities are ineffective in providing stability and adequate pain relief. We present our experience of diagnosis, presentation, and surgical management for metastatic tumors to the upper cervical spine (UCS).

Methods:

Single-center single-surgeon database of consecutively operated posterior occiput-cervical fusion for metastasis to UCS was reviewed from 2007 to 2016. Demographics, clinical, and surgical data were collected through chart review. Pain scores based on Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and other radiological data were noted. Kaplan–Meier curve was used for survival analysis. Clinical outcomes and complications were recorded.

Results:

A total of 29 patients (17 females/12 males) had the mean age of 56.7 ± 13.5 (24–82). Predominant metastasis included from the breast in 9 (31.03%) cases, followed by renal in 5, melanoma in 4, and 3 each from lung and colon. Axis was involved in 24 cases (C2 body in 21, pedicle in 8 cases). Atlas was involved in 9 cases (lateral mass in 8 cases and arch in 3 cases) and occiput was involved in three cases. Average Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score was 10 ± 2.3 (7–14). Mild cord compression was seen in 7 cases. Fusion extended from occiput to C4 fusion (n = 23), C5 (n = 5), and C6 (n = 1). Average blood loss was 364.8 ± 252.1 ml and operative time was 235 ± 51.9 min. Average length of stay was 7 ± 2.8 days (3–15). VAS improved from 8.3 ± 1.5 to 1 ± 1.1 (P < 0.001). C2 angulation corrected from 2.1° ±5.3° (0°–17°) to 0.5° ±1.2° (P = 0.045). Three patients each developed cardiopulmonary complications and deep infection. The average survival was 14.5 ± 15.1 (0.15–50) months.

Conclusion:

C2 body is the most common site of metastasis. Occiput-cervical fusion for unstable upper cervical metastasis offers a good palliative treatment for pain relief and improved quality of life.

Craniocervical trauma above the age of 90: are current prognostic scores sufficient?

Clinical data following head or spine trauma in patients over 90 years is rare. The aim of this study was to analyze this patient cohort, assessing clinical characteristics, outcomes, and survival rates and to identify variables that may predict early mortality. A retrospective analysis of all patients over the age of 90 that were treated between January 2006 and December 2016 at our department was performed. Patient characteristics, type of injury, and comorbidities were analyzed with regard to the 30-day mortality rate as the primary outcome. One hundred seventy-nine patients were identified. Mean age was 93 (range 90-102); 105 (59%) patients were female. One hundred thirty-two (74%) and 34 (19%) of patients presented with head and spinal trauma, respectively. Fourteen patients (8%) had a combined head and spine injury. One hundred (56%) patients were treated operatively. Mean Charlson comorbidity index was 4.1 (range 0-18), mean diagnosis count was 6.2 (range 0-12), mean geriatric index of comorbidity (GIC) was 3.3 (range 1-4), and mean Barthel index was 28 (range 0-100). The 30-day mortality rate was 31%. Multivariate cox regression analysis showed that head trauma had a 1.66 hazard ratio (p = 0.036) of dying within 30 days of admission, whereas a higher Glasgow coma score and surgical treatment had a hazard ratio of 0.88 (p = 0.0001) and 0.72 (p = 0.05) to reach the primary outcome. None of the standard geriatric scores reached any significant correlation with the primary outcome. Standard geriatric prognostic scores seem less reliable to predict mortality for patients above the age of 90. Higher Glasgow coma score and surgical treatment were associated with a higher survival probability.

C1-C2 fractures in asymptomatic elderly patients with minor head trauma: evaluation with a dedicated head CT protocol

Objective

To evaluate the frequency and types of upper cervical spine injuries in asymptomatic elderly patients undergoing computed tomography (CT) for the investigation of minor head trauma.

Materials and Methods

This was a prospective study of 2613 asymptomatic elderly patients with minor head trauma seen between January 2015 and December 2016. We adopted a dedicated head CT protocol that included the C1-C2 region.

Results

Of the 2613 patients analyzed, 33 (1.26%) had upper cervical spine injuries, corresponding to 8.37% of the 394 patients with trauma-related findings. Of those 33 patients, 6 had C1 fractures and 27 had C2 fractures. The use of 16- and 128-slice scanners increased the CT dose by 25.0% and 23.7%, respectively.

Conclusion

Inclusion of the C1-C2 region in head CT scans allowed us to identify upper cervical spine injuries in 1.26% of asymptomatic elderly patients with minor head trauma. The protocol evaluated helps detect potentially life-threatening injuries and could be adopted for routine use in elderly individuals with minor head trauma.

Variations in treatment of C1 fractures by time, age, and geographic region in the United States: An analysis of 985 patients

The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the variations in the treatment of C1 fractures over time, by age group, and by geographic region using a nationwide database. The Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS) database was queried to identify patients ≥18 years who sustained C1 fracture from 2006-2012. Patients were filtered based on the intervention they received: collar, halo, or surgery. Regions of hospital used in analysis were defined as Northeast, Midwest, South, and West. Surgical intervention for C1 fracture increased from 27.1% of cases in 2006 to 55.4% of cases in 2012 (P<0.001). The rate of collar treatment increased with increasing age. In contrast, rate of halo use decreased with increasing age. A greater proportion of patients in the Northeast were treated by collar compared to all other regions (P<0.001). We can conclude that there is considerable variation in the treatment of C1 fractures with regards to age and geographic region. Surgical treatment of these fractures is increasing over time. Future considerations should be given to developing treatment guidelines to decrease variation and potentially create cost-savings.

C1 fracture: Analysis of consolidation and complications rates in a prospective multicenter series

INTRODUCTION

Three types of C1 fracture have been described, according to location: type 1 (anterior or posterior arc), type 2 (Jefferson: anterior and posterior arc), and type 3 (lateral mass). Stability depends on transverse ligament integrity. The main aim of the present study was to analyze complications and consolidation rates according to fracture type, age and treatment.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The French Society of Spinal Surgery (SFCR) performed a multicenter prospective study on C1-C2 trauma. All patients with recent fracture diagnosed on CT were included. Consolidation on CT was studied at 3 months and 1 year. Medical, neurologic, infectious and mechanical complications were inventoried using the KEOPS data-base.

RESULTS

Sixty-three of the 417 patients (15.1%) had C1 fracture: type 1 (33.3%), type 2 (38.1%), or type 3 (28.6%). The transverse ligament was intact in 53.9% of cases. Treatment was non-operative in 63.5% of cases, surgical in 27.0%, and surgical after failure of non-operative treatment in 9.5%. There were 8 medical complications, more frequently in patients aged >70 years, following surgery (p<0.0001). The consolidation rate was 84.2% with non-operative treatment, 100% for primary surgery, and 33.3% for secondary surgery (p=0.002). There were 10 cases of non-union, in 4.8% of type 1, 13.6% of type 2 and 33.3% of type 3 fractures (p=0.001).

CONCLUSION

Medical complications showed association with age and with type of treatment. Non-operative treatment was suited to types 1, 2 and 3 with minimal displacement and intact transverse ligament. C1-C2 fusion was suited to displaced unstable type 2 fracture. Displaced type 3 fracture incurred risk of non-union. Early surgery may be recommended.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Age and Other Risk Factors Influencing Long-Term Mortality in Patients With Traumatic Cervical Spine Fracture

Objective

To identify clinical or demographic variables that influence long-term mortality, as well as in-hospital mortality, with a particular focus on the effects of age.

Summary and Background Data

Cervical spine fractures with or without spinal cord injury (SCI) disproportionately impact the elderly who constitute an increasing percentage of the US population.

Methods

We analyzed data collected for 10 years at a state-designated level I trauma center to identify variables that influenced in-hospital and long-term mortality among elderly patients with traumatic cervical spine fracture with or without SCI. Acute in-hospital mortality was determined from hospital records and long-term mortality within the study period (2003-2013) was determined from the National Death Index. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to identify factors influencing survival.

Results

Data from patients (N = 632) with cervical spine fractures were analyzed, the majority (66%) of whom were geriatric (older than age 64). Most patients (62%) had a mild/moderate injury severity score (ISS; median, interquartile range: 6, 5). Patients with SCI had significantly longer lengths of stay (14.1 days), days on a ventilator (3.5 days), and higher ISS (14.9) than patients without SCI (P < .0001 for all). Falls were the leading mechanism of injury for patients older than age 64. Univariate analysis identified that long-term survival decreased significantly for all patients older than age 65 (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.07; P < .0001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated age (HR: 1.08; P < .0001), gender (HR: 1.60; P < .0007), and SCI status (HR: 1.45, P < .02) significantly influenced survival during the study period.

Conclusion

This study identified age, gender, and SCI status as significant variables for this study population influencing long-term survival among patients with cervical spine fractures. Our results support the growing notion that cervical spine injuries in geriatric patients with trauma may warrant additional research.

Improving life expectancy: A 'broken neck' doesn't have to be a terminal diagnosis for the elderly

Background

Elderly patients with cervical spine fractures require optimal care. Treatment with a cervical collar or halo instead of surgical fixation may increase mortality. This investigation intends to describe the life expectancy after injury and evaluate the impact of surgical intervention on mortality.

Methods

Patients ≥65 years, with traumatic cervical spine fractures without cord injury were identified in the 1995-2009 California Office of Statewide Health and Planning database. Those with halo placement or surgical spine fixation were identified. Primary outcome was death, studied at the initial admission, 30 days, 1 year, and the entire study period. Univariate and multivariate regressions were performed to identify predictors of death. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to describe life expectancy after injury.

Results

10 938 patients were identified. Mortality rate was 10% during the initial admission, 28% at 1 year and 50% during the entire study period. A halo was placed in 14% of patients and 12% underwent surgical fixation. Mortality rates during the initial admission were 11% for patients without an intervention, 7% with halo placement and 6% with surgical fixation; at 1 year, these increased to 30%, 26% and 19%, respectively. At 1 year, more than one in four patients above 75 years of age will die.At 1 year spine fixation, female gender and admission to a trauma center predicted a lower risk of death at 1 year (OR 0.59, 0.68; p<0.001 and OR 0.89; p=0.02, respectively). Having a complication, fall mechanism, and traumatic brain injury (OR 1.84, 1.33, 1.37; p<0.001, respectively) were predictors of a higher risk of death. Halo use had no impact on death at 1 year (OR 0.98; p=0.77).

Discussion

Mortality rates after cervical spine fracture in the elderly is high. Surgical fixation is associated with improved survival; remaining true after adjusting for age and comorbidities; suggesting that surgical fixation may improve outcomes in the elderly.

Level of evidence

Level IV.

Cervical spine immobilisation in the elderly: a literature review

Developed populations are ageing rapidly and by 2040, approximately 1 in 4 adults will be over 65 years of age. This is resulting in higher incidence of traumatic injury in older patients. Cognitive and physical comorbidities in this group can pose significant challenges. Due to mechanisms of injury and pre-existing degenerative spinal disease, cervical spine fractures are particularly prevalent in elderly patients. These are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. In this literature review we examine current evidence surrounding the use of cervical spine immobilisation in elderly patients in the pre-hospital and emergency department setting and also as a treatment option for cervical spine fractures. We explore evidence surrounding the complications that can arise from cervical spine immobilisation, including the development of pressure sores, raised intracranial pressure, dysphagia, breathing difficulties, delirium, compliance issues, mobility and functional outcome.

Vertebral Artery Caught in the Fracture Gap after Traumatic C2/3 Spondylolisthesis

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Patient with a C2 fracture and entrapment of the right vertebral artery in the fracture gap.

PURPOSE

Presentation of a case with follow-up until end of treatment.

STUDY DESIGN

Case report.

METHODS

A 25-year-old woman was brought into our emergency room after falling while riding a horse. She complained of pain in the cervical spine. Clinical examinations showed local tenderness at the upper cervical spine and painful impairment of the mobility of the neck, with no signs of neurological impairment. Radiological diagnostics revealed a traumatic C2/3 spondylolisthesis. A computer tomography (CT) angiographic scan showed a dislocation of the right vertebral artery into the fracture gap without injury to the artery. Open reduction and osteosynthesis were considered of too high risk. Therefore, we conducted fracture treatment with closed reduction and halo fixation. After removal of the halo fixator, the patient was given a soft cervical collar and was advised to rest for additional 6 weeks before beginning gradual activity.

RESULTS

Conventional follow-up revealed osseous consolidation and a CT angiographic scan showed consistent blood flow to the artery.

CONCLUSION

Halo fixation was a safe and effective therapy strategy in the case of vertebral artery entrapment after traumatic C2 spondylolisthesis.

Cervical Fractures: Does Injury Level Impact the Incidence of Dysphagia in Elderly Patients?

Dysphagia is common in the elderly with significant consequences such as aspiration and malnutrition. This study seeks to investigate oropharyngeal dysphagia in elderly patients with cervical fractures and determine whether the level of cervical fracture impacts the incidence of swallowing dysfunction. Records of trauma patients ≥65 admitted with cervical fractures over a 76-month period to a level 1 trauma center were reviewed. History of dysphagia, stroke, tracheostomy or spinal cord injury were excluded criteria, leaving 161 patients for analysis. Evaluation of swallowing function was performed to identify dysphagia and variables were analyzed. A total of 161 patients met inclusion criteria and 42 (26.1%) had dysphagia. Patients with dysphagia were older (84.1 ± 8.93 vs. 79.9 ± 8.48, p = 0.006), had higher hospital length of stay (9.0 ± 4.48 vs. 4.6 ± 3.30, p = <0.0001), and were more likely to have intensive care unit days (52.4% vs. 21.8%, p = 0.0002). Non-operatively-managed patients with C1 fractures were more likely to have dysphagia than patients without C1 fractures (29.2% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.0008). After regression analysis, C1 fracture increased the likelihood of dysphagia by four times (OR = 4.0; 95% CI 1.2–13.0). Oropharyngeal dysphagia is common in elderly patients with cervical fracture. Non-operatively-managed patients with C1 fractures are at increased risk and may benefit from more vigorous surveillance.

Risk Factors for Failure of Nonoperative Treatment for Unilateral Cervical Facet Fractures

Study Design

Retrospective clinical study.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to determine what percentage of patients who underwent nonoperative management of unilateral non-displaced or minimally displaced facet fractures progressed radiographically and to determine what percentage of patients required surgical intervention and to identify risk factors for failure of conservative management.

Overview of Literature

According to most commonly used classification systems, unilateral, non-and minimally displaced facet fractures are be amendable to nonoperative management.

Methods

A retrospective review of the Trauma Registry of a Level I trauma center was performed to identify all patients diagnosed with a non- or minimally displaced unilateral facet fracture which was managed nonoperatively. Several demographic variables and clinical outcomes were recorded. Using computed tomography scanning and plain radiographs, fracture pattern, listhesis, displacement, angle and percentage of the facet that included the fracture were determined. Radiographic progression was defined as the occurrence of listhesis of more than 10% of the anterior-posterior dimensions of the inferior vertebral body during radiographic follow-up. Failure of conservative management was defined as a patient requiring surgical intervention after initially being managed nonoperatively.

Results

Seventy-four patients were included. Fifteen patients (20%) progressed radiographically. However, only 2 developed radicular symptoms and none developed myelopathy or other catastrophic cord related symptoms. Seven patients (9%) underwent surgery. Indications for surgery included significant radiographic progression and/or radicular symptoms. Risk factors for failure of conservative management included presence of radiculopathy at the time of presentation, a higher body mass index, increased Injury Severity Score, greater initial fracture displacement and more than 2 mm of listhesis.

Conclusions

Patients with non-displaced or minimally displaced facet fractures who do not have neurological symptoms at the time of presentation can safely be managed conservatively with careful observation and follow-up.