The effect of continuous combined hormone replacement therapy on arterial reactivity in postmenopausal women with established angina pectoris

Estrogen and progestogen inhibit NF-κB in atherosclerotic tissues of ovariectomized ApoE (-/-) mice

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effects of estrogen and progestogen treatment on atherosclerotic inflammation and vascular remodeling.

METHODS

Atherosclerosis was induced by feeding ovariectomized ApoE (-/-) mice a cholesterol-rich diet. Estrogen and progestogen were supplied as estradiol valerate (E2V, orally, 0.07 mg/kg/day) and dydrogesterone (DG, orally, 0.2 mg/kg/day), respectively, for 8 weeks. Levels of the vascular inflammatory marker nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) and arterial remodeling marker matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9) were examined. Estrogen receptor (ER) involvement was analyzed by treating with antagonists.

RESULTS

E2V and DG treatment reduced NF-κB mRNA and protein levels in atherosclerotic tissue from ovariectomized ApoE (-/-) mice, and the difference in expression trended towards statistical significance. Moreover, treatment with the ERβ-specific antagonist significantly increased NF-κB mRNA and protein levels in both the E2V treatment group and the E2V and DG combined treatment group (p < 0.05), suggesting that E2V inhibits NF-κB overexpression in atherosclerotic tissue through ERβ-mediated signaling. However, E2V and DG co-treatment did not significantly affect MMP-9 mRNA or protein expression in atherosclerotic tissue. Introduction of ER antagonists to E2V and DG co-treatment still did not significantly affect MMP-9 expression.

CONCLUSION

E2V and DG treatment may inhibit arterial inflammation by regulating ERβ-related signaling pathways.

Hypotheses, rationale, design, and methods for prognostic evaluation in type 2 diabetic patients with angiographically normal coronary arteries. The MASS IV-DM Trial

Background

The MASS IV-DM Trial is a large project from a single institution, the Heart Institute (InCor), University of São Paulo Medical School, Brazil to study ventricular function and coronary arteries in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Methods/Design

The study will enroll 600 patients with type 2 diabetes who have angiographically normal ventricular function and coronary arteries. The goal of the MASS IV-DM Trial is to achieve a long-term evaluation of the development of coronary atherosclerosis by using angiograms and coronary-artery calcium scan by electron-beam computed tomography at baseline and after 5 years of follow-up. In addition, the incidence of major cardiovascular events, the dysfunction of various organs involved in this disease, particularly microalbuminuria and renal function, will be analyzed through clinical evaluation. In addition, an effort will be made to investigate in depth the presence of major cardiovascular risk factors, especially the biochemical profile, metabolic syndrome inflammatory activity, oxidative stress, endothelial function, prothrombotic factors, and profibrinolytic and platelet activity. An evaluation will be made of the polymorphism as a determinant of disease and its possible role in the genesis of micro- and macrovascular damage.

Discussion

The MASS IV-DM trial is designed to include diabetic patients with clinically suspected myocardial ischemia in whom conventional angiography shows angiographically normal coronary arteries. The result of extensive investigation including angiographic follow-up by several methods, vascular reactivity, pro-thrombotic mechanisms, genetic and biochemical studies may facilitate the understanding of so-called micro- and macrovascular disease of DM.

Tibolone and estradiol plus norethisterone acetate similarly influence endothelium-dependent vasodilatation in healthy postmenopausal women

In healthy postmenopausal women, E(2) plus norethisterone acetate (1 mg + 0.5 mg) or tibolone (2.5 mg) similarly modify flow-mediated endothelium-dependent vasodilatation. The effect is dependent on baseline vasodilator reserve, with low values being augmented by either treatment.

The effect of tibolone and continuous combined conjugated equine oestrogens plus medroxyprogesterone acetate on progression of carotid intima–media thickness: the Osteoporosis Prevention and Arterial effects of tiboLone (OPAL) study

AIMS

At the time of the design of the Osteoporosis Prevention and Arterial effects of tiboLone (OPAL) study in 1996, oral hormone therapy (HT) was assumed to reduce cardiovascular risk. The evidence mainly came from the effects of combined conjugated equine oestrogens plus medroxyprogesterone acetate (CEE/MPA) therapy. Other HT regimes had not been studied widely. Tibolone, a selective tissue oestrogenic activity regulator, has several effects on cardiovascular risk factors, one of which is HDL lowering. Because the overall effect of tibolone on cardiovascular risk was unknown, the OPAL study was designed.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The OPAL study was a three-arm, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study to determine the effect of tibolone (2.5 mg daily) and of CEE/MPA (0.625/2.5 mg daily) over 3 years on progression of carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) in 866 healthy post-menopausal women. The women were recruited from six US and five European centres. The primary outcome was change in mean common CIMT. Annual common CIMT progression rates in the tibolone and CEE/MPA groups were higher than in the placebo group: 0.0077 mm [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.0051-0.0103] in the tibolone group, 0.0074 mm (0.0048-0.0099) in the CEE/MPA group, and 0.0035 mm (0.009-0.0061) in the placebo group. The differences with placebo (0.0042 mm/year for tibolone and 0.0039 mm/year for CEE/MPA) were statistically significant. HDL cholesterol increased in CEE/MPA group and was lowered in the tibolone group.

CONCLUSION

Both tibolone and CEE/MPA showed increased progression of common CIMT. Translation of the increased common CIMT progression of the CEE/MPA group into cardiovascular disease risk could not fully explain the observed increased cardiovascular risk as observed in the Women's Health Initiative study. This suggests that the net effect of tibolone and CEE/MPA on cardiovascular events may depend on the combined effects on the arterial wall, clotting factors, and possibly inflammation.

Hormone therapy and antioxidant vitamins do not improve endothelial vasodilator function in postmenopausal women with established coronary artery disease: a substudy of the Women's Angiographic Vitamin and Estrogen (WAVE) trial

We measured flow-mediated dilation (FMD) by high-resolution brachial ultrasound in 61 women who participated in the Women's Angiographic Vitamin and Estrogen (WAVE) trial, a randomized controlled trial. There were no significant differences in the baseline demographics of women receiving hormone therapy (0.625 mg/day of conjugated equine estrogen plus 2.5mg of medroxyprogesterone acetate for women who had not had a hysterectomy) or placebo; or vitamins (400 IU of Vitamin E and 500 mg of Vitamin C twice daily) or placebo. Baseline FMD was impaired in all subjects (3.3+/-7.6%). Neither hormone therapy (4.1+/-5.2% at baseline, 4.2+/-5.0% at 3 months, and 4.1+/-6.5% at 34 months) nor antioxidant vitamins (3.0+/-8.3% at baseline; 3.5+/-4.6% at 3 months; 3.1+/-7.6% at 34 months) improved FMD (all p-values=NS). Endothelium-independent vasodilation, induced by nitroglycerin (NTG) was similar at baseline and was not affected by either therapy. In univariate and multivariate analysis, neither hormone therapy nor antioxidant vitamins were associated with FMD. Women with established coronary artery disease have impaired flow-mediated vasodilation of the brachial artery that does not improve after 3 months or up to 34 months of treatment with postmenopausal hormone therapy or antioxidant vitamins.

Brachial artery reactivity in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and microalbuminuria (from the Detection of Ischemia in Asymptomatic Diabetics-brachial artery reactivity study)

Microalbuminuria is a novel atherosclerotic risk factor in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and predicts future cardiovascular events. Endothelial dysfunction and systemic inflammation have been proposed as common links between microalbuminuria and cardiovascular disease. However, no study has assessed the relation between microalbuminuria and vascular dysfunction as measured by brachial artery reactivity (BAR) in DM. We evaluated 143 patients (85 men; mean age 60.0 +/- 6.7 years) with DM (mean duration 8.2 +/- 7.4 years) enrolled in the Detection of Ischemia in Asymptomatic Diabetics study. Subjects were categorized as those with microalbuminuria (ratio of urinary albumin to creatinine 30 to 299 microg/mg creatinine, n = 28) and those with normoalbuminuria (ratio of urinary albumin to creatinine 0 to 29.9 microg/mg creatinine, n = 115). High-resolution ultrasound BAR testing was used to measure endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent vasodilations. C-reactive protein was measured as a marker of systemic inflammation. Patients with microalbuminuria and normoalbuminuria had similar baseline characteristics, with the exception that those with microalbuminuria had a longer duration of DM (p = 0.03). Endothelium-dependent vasodilation at 1 minute (p = 0.01) and endothelium-independent vasodilation at 3 minutes (p = 0.007) were significantly less in patients with microalbuminuria. In addition, 96% of patients with microalbuminuria and 76% of those with normoalbuminuria had impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation (<8%, p = 0.01). Microalbuminuria was an independent predictor of endothelium-dependent vasodilation in the entire cohort (p = 0.045) and after excluding patients on hormone replacement therapy (p = 0.01). Levels of C-reactive protein were significantly higher in patients with microalbuminuria than in those with normoalbuminuria (p = 0.02). We conclude that in DM the presence of microalbuminuria is associated with impaired endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent vasodilations of the brachial artery and a higher degree of systemic inflammation. In addition, microalbuminuria is an independent predictor of endothelial dysfunction in asymptomatic patients with DM, especially in the absence of hormone replacement therapy.

Lipid changes on hormone therapy and coronary heart disease events in the Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study (HERS)

BACKGROUND

Despite the effect of lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and raising high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels, combination hormone therapy did not reduce the incidence of coronary heart disease (CHD) events in the Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study (HERS). To explore possible mechanisms, we examined the association between lipid changes and CHD outcomes among women assigned to hormone therapy.

METHODS

HERS participants were postmenopausal women with previously diagnosed CHD who were randomly assigned to receive conjugated estrogens and medroxyprogesterone or identical placebo and then followed-up for an average of 4.1 years. Among women assigned to hormone therapy, associations between baseline-to-year-1 lipid level changes and CHD events were compared with the associations observed for baseline lipids using multivariate proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

Among women assigned to hormone therapy, CHD events were independently predicted by baseline LDL-C levels (relative hazard [RH] 0.94 per 15.6 mg/dL decrease, 95% CI 0.88-1.01) and HDL-C levels (RH 0.89 per 5.4 mg/dL increase, 95% CI 0.81-0.99), but not by triglyceride levels (RH 1.01 per 13.2 mg/dL increase, 95% CI 0.97-1.06). CHD events were marginally associated with first-year reductions in LDL-C levels (RH 0.95 per 15.6 mg/dL decrease, 95% CI 0.86-1.04), and were not associated with increases in HDL-C levels ( RH 1.03 per 5.4 mg/dL increase, 95% CI 0.91-1.16) or triglyceride levels (RH 1.01 per 13.2 mg/dL increase, 95% CI 0.98-1.05).

CONCLUSION

Changes in lipid levels with hormone therapy are not predictive of CHD outcomes in women with heart disease in the HERS trial.

Age-related endothelial dysfunction : potential implications for pharmacotherapy

Aging per se is associated with abnormalities of the vascular wall linked to both structural and functional changes that can take place at the level of the extracellular matrix, the vascular smooth muscle and the endothelium of blood vessels. Endothelial dysfunction is generally defined as a decrease in the capacity of the endothelium to dilate blood vessels in response to physical and chemical stimuli. It is one of the characteristic changes that occur with age, independently of other known cardiovascular risk factors. This may account in part for the increased incidence of cardiovascular events in elderly people that can be reversed by restoring endothelial function. A better understanding of the mechanisms involved and the aetiopathogenesis of this process will help in the search for new therapeutic agents.Age-dependent alteration of endothelium-dependent relaxation seems to be a widespread phenomenon both in conductance and resistance arteries from several species. In the course of aging, there is an alteration in the equilibrium between relaxing and contracting factors released by the endothelium. Hence, there is a progressive reduction in the participation of nitric oxide and endothelium-derived hyperpolarising factor associated with increased participation of oxygen-derived free radicals and cyclo-oxygenase-derived prostanoids. Also, the endothelin-1 and angiotensin II pathways may play a role in age-related endothelial dysfunction. The use of drugs acting at different levels of these signalling cascades, including antioxidant therapy, lipid-lowering drugs and estrogens, seems to be promising.

Role of progestogen in hormone therapy for postmenopausal women: position statement of The North American Menopause Society

OBJECTIVE

To create an evidence-based position statement regarding the role of progestogen in postmenopausal hormone therapy (estrogen plus a progestogen, or EPT) for the management of menopause-related symptoms.

DESIGN

NAMS followed the general principles established for evidence-based guidelines to create this document. Clinicians and researchers acknowledged to be experts in the field of postmenopausal hormone therapy were enlisted to review the evidence obtained from the medical literature and develop a position statement for approval by the NAMS Board of Trustees.

RESULTS

The primary role of progestogen in postmenopausal hormone therapy is endometrial protection. Unopposed estrogen therapy (ET) is associated with a significantly increased risk of endometrial hyperplasia and adenocarcinoma. Adding the appropriate dose and duration of progestogen to ET has been shown to lower that risk to the level found in never-users of ET. The clinical goal of progestogen in EPT is to provide endometrial protection while maintaining estrogen benefits and minimizing progestogen-induced side effects, particularly uterine bleeding. EPT discontinuance correlates with uterine bleeding-women with more days of amenorrhea have higher rates of continuance. All US Food and Drug Administration-approved progestogen formulations will provide endometrial protection if the dose and duration are adequate. Progestogens may diminish the beneficial effects of ET on cardiovascular risk factors. However, no EPT (or ET) regimen should be initiated for the primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular heart disease. Some progestogens may negatively affect mood. Adding progestogen to ET does not decrease the breast cancer risk, although it does not seem to increase mortality. Progestogen increases mammographic density, which is reversed after discontinuation of use. Progestogen has limited effect on the bone-enhancing action of ET. In general, the side effects of added progestogen are mild, although they may be severe in a small percentage of women.

CONCLUSIONS

Progestogen should be added to ET for all postmenopausal women with an intact uterus to prevent the elevated risk of estrogen-induced endometrial hyperplasia and adenocarcinoma. There is no consensus on a preferred regimen for all women. By changing the progestogen type, route, or regimen, clinicians can individualize therapy to minimize side effects, especially uterine bleeding, and limit any effects on ET benefits while providing adequate endometrial protection.