Long-term treatment with pitavastatin (NK-104), a new HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, of patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia

GENetic characteristics and REsponse to lipid-lowering therapy in familial hypercholesterolemia: GENRE-FH study

Among the 146 patients enrolled in the Korean FH registry, 83 patients who had undergone appropriate LLT escalation and were followed-up for ≥ 6 months were analyzed for pathogenic variants (PVs). The achieved percentage of expected low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction (primary variable) and achievement rates of LDL-C < 70 mg/dL were assessed. The correlations between the treatment response and the characteristics of PVs, and the weighted 4 SNP-based score were evaluated. The primary variables were significantly lower in the PV-positive patients than in the PV-negative patients (p = 0.007). However, the type of PV did not significantly correlate with the primary variable. The achievement rates of LDL-C < 70 mg/dL was very low, regardless of the PV characteristics. Patients with a higher 4-SNP score showed a lower primary variable (R² = 0.045, p = 0.048). Among evolocumab users, PV-negative patients or those with only defective PVs revealed higher primary variable, whereas patients with at least one null PV showed lower primary variables. The adjusted response of patients with FH to LLT showed significant associations with PV positivity and 4-SNP score. These results may be helpful in managing FH patients with diverse genetic backgrounds.

Pitavastatin for lowering lipids

BACKGROUND

Pitavastatin is the newest statin on the market, and the dose-related magnitude of effect of pitavastatin on blood lipids is not known.

OBJECTIVES

Primary objective To quantify the effects of various doses of pitavastatin on the surrogate markers: LDL cholesterol, total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol and triglycerides in participants with and without cardiovascular disease. To compare the effect of pitavastatin on surrogate markers with other statins.  Secondary objectives To quantify the effect of various doses of pitavastatin on withdrawals due to adverse effects.  SEARCH METHODS: The Cochrane Hypertension Information Specialist searched the following databases for trials up to March 2019: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, Issue 2, 2019), MEDLINE (from 1946), Embase (from 1974), the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and ClinicalTrials.gov. We also contacted authors of relevant papers regarding further published and unpublished work. The searches had no language restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

RCT and controlled before-and-after studies evaluating the dose response of different fixed doses of pitavastatin on blood lipids over a duration of three to 12 weeks in participants of any age with and without cardiovascular disease.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed eligibility criteria for studies to be included, and extracted data. We entered data from RCT and controlled before-and-after studies into Review Manager 5 as continuous and generic inverse variance data, respectively. Withdrawals due to adverse effects (WDAE) information was collected from the RCTs. We assessed all included trials using the Cochrane 'Risk of bias' tool under the categories of allocation (selection bias), blinding (performance bias and detection bias), incomplete outcome data (attrition bias), selective reporting (reporting bias), and other potential sources of bias.

MAIN RESULTS

Forty-seven studies (five RCTs and 42 before-and-after studies) evaluated the dose-related efficacy of pitavastatin in 5436 participants. The participants were of any age with and without cardiovascular disease, and pitavastatin effects were studied within a treatment period of three to 12 weeks. Log dose-response data over doses of 1 mg to 16 mg revealed strong linear dose-related effects on blood total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol and triglycerides. There was no dose-related effect of pitavastatin on blood HDL cholesterol, which was increased by 4% on average by pitavastatin. Pitavastatin 1 mg/day to 16 mg/day reduced LDL cholesterol by 33.3% to 54.7%, total cholesterol by 23.3% to 39.0% and triglycerides by 13.0% to 28.1%. For every two-fold dose increase, there was a 5.35% (95% CI 3.32 to 7.38) decrease in blood LDL cholesterol, a 3.93% (95% CI 2.35 to 5.50) decrease in blood total cholesterol and a 3.76% (95% CI 1.03 to 6.48) decrease in blood triglycerides. The certainty of evidence for these effects was judged to be high. When compared to other statins for its effect to reduce LDL cholesterol, pitavastatin is about 6-fold more potent than atorvastatin, 1.7-fold more potent than rosuvastatin, 77-fold more potent than fluvastatin and 3.3-fold less potent than cerivastatin. For the placebo group, there were no participants who withdrew due to an adverse effect per 109 subjects and for all doses of pitavastatin, there were three participants who withdrew due to an adverse effect per 262 subjects.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Pitavastatin lowers blood total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and triglyceride in a dose-dependent linear fashion. Based on the effect on LDL cholesterol, pitavastatin is about 6-fold more potent than atorvastatin, 1.7-fold more potent than rosuvastatin, 77-fold more potent than fluvastatin and 3.3-fold less potent than cerivastatin. There were not enough data to determine risk of withdrawal due to adverse effects due to pitavastatin.

Efficacy and safety of pitavastatins in patients with acute myocardial infarction: Livalo in Acute Myocardial Infarction Study (LAMIS) II

BACKGROUND/AIMS

We evaluated the efficacy and safety and influence on glucose tolerance by different doses of pitavastatins in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients.

METHODS

Consecutive 1,101 AMI patients who were enrolled in Livalo in Acute Myocardial Infarction Study (LAMIS)-II were randomly assigned to receive either 2 mg of pitavastatin or 4 mg of pitavastatin orally per day. Primary efficacy endpoint was composite of cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, target-lesion revascularization, and hospitalization for unstable angina, heart failure or arrhythmic events at 12-month.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in primary efficacy endpoint between 2 mg and 4 mg groups (9.07% vs. 9.13%, p = 0.976). The degree of the reduction of low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) was significantly greater in 4 mg group compared to 2 mg group from baseline to follow-up (-42.05 ± 32.73 mg/dL vs. -34.23 ± 31.66 mg/dL, p = 0.002). Fasting plasma glucose level was reduced significantly in both groups (-20.16 ± 54.49 mg/dL in 4 mg group and -24.45 ± 63.88 mg/dL in 2 mg group, p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively) and there was no significant change of glycated hemoglobin in two groups from baseline to follow-up (-0.13% ± 1.21% in 4 mg group and -0.04% ± 1.10% in 2 mg group, p = 0.256 and p = 0.671, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Although LDL-C was reduced more significantly by using 4 mg of pitavastatin compared to 2 mg of pitavastatin, the event rate was comparable without adverse effects on glucose tolerance in both groups in AMI patients who were enrolled in LAMIS-II.

My Approach to the Patient With Familial Hypercholesterolemia

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), a relatively common Mendelian genetic disorder, is associated with a dramatically increased lifetime risk of premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease due to elevated plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. The diagnosis of FH is based on clinical presentation or genetic testing. Early identification of patients with FH is of great public health importance because preventive strategies can lower the absolute lifetime cardiovascular risk and screening can detect affected relatives. However, low awareness, detection, and control of FH pose hurdles in the prevention of FH-related cardiovascular events. Of the estimated 0.65 million to 1 million patients with FH in the United States, less than 10% carry a diagnosis of FH. Based on registry data, a substantial proportion of patients with FH are receiving no or inadequate lipid-lowering therapy. Statins remain the mainstay of treatment for patients with FH. Lipoprotein apheresis and newly approved lipid-lowering drugs are valuable adjuncts to statin therapy, particularly when the LDL-C-lowering response is suboptimal. Monoclonal antibodies targeting proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 provide an additional approximately 60% lowering of LDL-C levels and are approved for use in patients with FH. For homozygous FH, 2 new drugs that work independent of the LDL receptor pathway are available: an apolipoprotein B antisense oligonucleotide (mipomersen) and a microsomal triglyceride transfer protein inhibitor (lomitapide). This review attempts to critically examine the available data to provide a summary of the current evidence for managing patients with FH, including screening, diagnosis, treatment, and surveillance.

Hypolipidemic treatment of heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: a lifelong challenge

In familial hypercholesterolemia, a defect in low-density lipoprotein receptors causes lifelong two- to threefold elevations in serum low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol levels. This leads to early atherosclerotic changes in infancy. Lifelong hypolipidemic treatment that can be started at a young age is thus greatly needed. Early diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia is important, and improved DNA tests for low-density lipoprotein receptor mutations have made it possible to carry out diagnosis at birth. A low saturated-fat, low cholesterol diet can be safely started at 7 months of age. This can be accompanied by dietary stanol esters from 2 years of age. At the age of 10, statin treatment can be safely started. In adults, more aggressive hypolipidemic treatment is required in order to reach the treatment goal for serum low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol levels less than 2.5 mmol/l. This can be achieved by using high doses of statin, or preferably by combining a statin with resin or ezetimibe (Zeita), Merck and Shering-Plough Pharmaceuticals). Once started, treatment of familial hypercholesterolemia is lifelong.

Protective effect of pitavastatin, a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor, on ischemia-induced neuronal damage

We investigated the neuroprotective effects of a novel 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor (pitavastatin) on ischemic neuronal damage in gerbils using immunohistochemistry. The animals were allowed to survive for 14 days after 5 min of ischemia induced by bilateral occlusion of the common carotid arteries. Five days after ischemia, severe neuronal cell loss was observed in the hippocampal CA1 sector. Prophylactic treatment with pitavastatin dose-dependently prevented the hippocampal CA1 neuronal cell loss 5 days after ischemia. Immunohistochemical study did not show the change of nNOS and iNOS expression in the hippocampus except for, in a few regions, up to 1 day after ischemia. Thereafter, the expression of iNOS was observed in the hippocampal CA1 sector 5 and 14 days after ischemia. In contrast, the expression of nNOS and eNOS gradually decreased in the hippocampal CA1 sector up to 14 days after ischemia. Prophylactic treatment with pitavastatin also prevented the expression of iNOS and the decrease of eNOS expression and the number of nNOS-positive cells in the hippocampal CA1 sector 5 days after ischemia. However, prophylactic treatment with pitavastatin at a dose of 10 mg kg(-1) did not change the immunoreactivity of iNOS and nNOS in the hippocampus at an early phase after ischemia. In contrast, this drug prevented the reduction of eNOS immunoreactivity in the hippocampal CA1 neurons at an early phase after ischemia. These findings demonstrate that the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor pitavastatin can protect hippocampal CA1 neurons after transient forebrain ischemia through up-regulation of eNOS expression in this region. Thus pharmacological modulation of eNOS expression may offer a novel therapeutic strategy for cerebral ischemic stroke.

Statins for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease

BACKGROUND

Reducing high blood cholesterol, a risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD) events in people with and without a past history of CVD is an important goal of pharmacotherapy. Statins are the first-choice agents. Previous reviews of the effects of statins have highlighted their benefits in people with CVD. The case for primary prevention was uncertain when the last version of this review was published (2011) and in light of new data an update of this review is required.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects, both harms and benefits, of statins in people with no history of CVD.

SEARCH METHODS

To avoid duplication of effort, we checked reference lists of previous systematic reviews. The searches conducted in 2007 were updated in January 2012. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library (2022, Issue 4), MEDLINE OVID (1950 to December Week 4 2011) and EMBASE OVID (1980 to 2012 Week 1).There were no language restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials of statins versus placebo or usual care control with minimum treatment duration of one year and follow-up of six months, in adults with no restrictions on total, low density lipoprotein (LDL) or high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels, and where 10% or less had a history of CVD.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently selected studies for inclusion and extracted data. Outcomes included all-cause mortality, fatal and non-fatal CHD, CVD and stroke events, combined endpoints (fatal and non-fatal CHD, CVD and stroke events), revascularisation, change in total and LDL cholesterol concentrations, adverse events, quality of life and costs. Odds ratios (OR) and risk ratios (RR) were calculated for dichotomous data, and for continuous data, pooled mean differences (MD) (with 95% confidence intervals (CI)) were calculated. We contacted trial authors to obtain missing data.

MAIN RESULTS

The latest search found four new trials and updated follow-up data on three trials included in the original review. Eighteen randomised control trials (19 trial arms; 56,934 participants) were included. Fourteen trials recruited patients with specific conditions (raised lipids, diabetes, hypertension, microalbuminuria). All-cause mortality was reduced by statins (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.94); as was combined fatal and non-fatal CVD RR 0.75 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.81), combined fatal and non-fatal CHD events RR 0.73 (95% CI 0.67 to 0.80) and combined fatal and non-fatal stroke (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.89). Reduction of revascularisation rates (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.72) was also seen. Total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol were reduced in all trials but there was evidence of heterogeneity of effects. There was no evidence of any serious harm caused by statin prescription. Evidence available to date showed that primary prevention with statins is likely to be cost-effective and may improve patient quality of life. Recent findings from the Cholesterol Treatment Trialists study using individual patient data meta-analysis indicate that these benefits are similar in people at lower (< 1% per year) risk of a major cardiovascular event.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Reductions in all-cause mortality, major vascular events and revascularisations were found with no excess of adverse events among people without evidence of CVD treated with statins.

Effects of pitavastatin on plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 in hyperlipidemic patients

The effects of statins on two platelet activation markers, plasiminogen activator inhibitor (PAI)-1 and adiponectin, were investigated in 68 patients with hyperlipidemia. The patients were treated with pitavastatin with a dosage of 2 mg daily. The plasma levels of platelet-derived microparticles (PDMP), soluble CD40 ligand (sCD40L), sP-selectin, PAI-1, and adiponectin were measured at baseline and after 6 months of treatment in both groups. In hyperlipidemic patients, the plasma levels were higher in PDMP, sCD40L, sP-selectin, and PAI-1, and lower in adiponectin, compared to the normolipidemic controls. Plasma PDMP and sCD40L were positively correlated, while plasma adiponectin was negatively correlated with the plasma levels of PAI-1. No significant differences were observed in the plasma levels of PDMP, sCD40L, sP-selectin, and PAI-1 before and after treatment. A significant increase in plasma adiponectin levels was observed after 6 months of treatment with pitavastatin. When the patients treated with pitavastatin were divided into two groups according to the adiponectin response to pitavastatin treatment, significant decreases in plasma PAI-1, PDMP, and sCD40L levels were observed after pitavastatin treatment in the responder group. These findings suggest that PDMP, sCD40L, and PAI-1 may participate in the development of atherothrombosis in patients with hyperlipidemia, and that pitavastatin may exert an adiponectin-dependent anti-atherothrombotic effect in hyperlipidemic patients.

Are all statins the same? Focus on the efficacy and tolerability of pitavastatin

Pitavastatin is the newest member of the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor family and is approved as adjunctive therapy to diet to reduce elevated levels of total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, apolipoprotein (Apo) B, and triglycerides and to increase levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol in adult patients with primary hyperlipidemia or mixed dyslipidemia. Pitavastatin undergoes minimal metabolism by cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes and, therefore, has a low propensity for drug-drug interactions with drugs metabolized by CYP enzymes or the CYP3A4 substrate grapefruit juice. In clinical trials, pitavastatin potently and consistently reduced serum levels of total, LDL, and non-HDL cholesterol, and triglycerides in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia where diet and other non-pharmacological measures were inadequate. Mean reductions from baseline in serum total and LDL cholesterol and triglyceride levels were 21-32%, 30-45%, and 10-30%, respectively. Moreover, a consistent trend towards increased HDL cholesterol levels of 3-10% was seen. Long-term extension studies show that the beneficial effects of pitavastatin are maintained for up to 2 years. Pitavastatin produces reductions from baseline in serum total and LDL cholesterol levels to a similar extent to those seen with the potent agent atorvastatin and to a greater extent than those seen with simvastatin or pravastatin. In the majority of other studies comparing pitavastatin and atorvastatin, no significant differences in the favorable effects on lipid parameters were seen, although pitavastatin was consistently associated with trends towards increased HDL cholesterol levels. Pitavastatin also produces beneficial effects on lipids in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and metabolic syndrome without deleterious effects on markers of glucose metabolism, such as fasting blood glucose levels or proportion of glycosylated hemoglobin. Pitavastatin appears to exert a number of beneficial effects on patients at risk of cardiovascular events independent of lipid lowering. In the JAPAN-ACS (Japan Assessment of Pitavastatin and Atorvastatin in Acute Coronary Syndrome) study, pitavastatin was non-inferior to atorvastatin at reducing plaque volume in patients with ACS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Further beneficial effects, including favorable effects on the size and composition of atherosclerotic plaques, improvements in cardiovascular function, and improvements in markers of inflammation, oxidative stress, and renal function, have been demonstrated in a number of small studies. Pitavastatin is generally well tolerated in hyperlipidemic patients with or without type 2 diabetes, with the most common treatment-related adverse events being musculoskeletal or gastrointestinal in nature. Increases in plasma creatine kinase levels were seen in <5% of pitavastatin recipients and the incidence of myopathy or rhabdomyolysis was extremely low. In summary, pitavastatin, the latest addition to the statin family, produces potent and consistent beneficial effects on lipids, is well tolerated, and has a favorable pharmacokinetic profile. The combination of a potent decrease in total and LDL cholesterol levels and increase in HDL cholesterol levels suggest that pitavastatin may produce substantial cardiovascular protection.

Endothelial Lipase Plasma Levels are Increased in Patients With Significant Carotid Artery Stenosis and History of Neurological Impairment

BACKGROUND

Endothelial lipase (EL) is a phospholipase expressed predominantly by vascular endothelial cells. The goal of the present study was to examine whether EL plasma levels in patients with carotid artery stenosis differ between those with previous history of neurological impairment and those without neurological symptoms.

METHODS

EL plasma levels were measured by a competitive ELISA assay.

RESULTS

EL plasma levels were significantly higher in the symptomatic, compared with the asymptomatic group (mean 489.61 ± 145 ng/ml (n = 31) vs. 388.39 ± 133 ng/ml (n = 24), t-test, P = 0.011).

CONCLUSION

We concluded that increased EL plasma levels reflect the patients' overall susceptibility for cerebrovascular events.

KEYWORDS

Atherosclerosis; Carotid artery stenosis; Endothelial lipase; Neurological impairment; Carotid endarterectomy.

Efficacy and safety of pitavastatin in Japanese patients with hypercholesterolemia: LIVES study and subanalysis

The Livalo Effectiveness and Safety (LIVES) study was an observational study to examine the efficacy and safety of pitavastatin, a newly developed drug, in approximately 20,000 Japanese patients with hypercholesterolemia. During a 2-year follow-up period, no significant problems concerning safety were observed upon treatment with pitavastatin. Pitavastatin demonstrated potent and stable lowering of the LDL-cholesterol level. The LIVES study subanalyses revealed significant and continuous elevation of HDL-cholesterol in association with pitavastatin treatment and also showed that the drug did not adversely affect glycemic control as evaluated by the glycohemoglobin A(1c) level. Moreover, pitavastatin treatment was associated with an increase in estimated glomerular filtration rate in subjects with chronic kidney disease. These results suggest the usefulness of pitavastatin in hypercholesterolemic patients from various backgrounds. The ongoing LIVES study extension is expected to provide further data on cardiovascular outcome in subjects treated with pitavastatin.

Long-term efficacy of pitavastatin versus simvastatin

INTRODUCTION

Pitavastatin is a novel, potent, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor. This study compared the long-term efficacy of pitavastatin and simvastatin in dyslipidemic patients at high risk of coronary heart disease.

METHODS

A 44-week blinded extension study was conducted at 24 centers in five European countries for patients who had previously completed a 12-week randomized, double-blind core study in which they received pitavastatin 4 mg or simvastatin 40 mg once daily. Patients originally randomized to pitavastatin 4 mg continued at the same dose throughout the extension study (n = 121). In simvastatin-treated patients (n = 57), the dose was increased to 80 mg in five patients who had not attained the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) target for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) during the core study. Primary endpoints were the proportion of patients attaining the NCEP and European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) LDL-C targets, and the NCEP target for non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) at weeks 16 and 44.

RESULTS

Of the 178 patients who entered the extension study, 156 patients (109 in the pitavastatin group, 47 in the simvastatin groups) completed the 44-week treatment period. At week 44, NCEP and EAS targets were attained by 81.7% and 84.2%, respectively, of pitavastatin-treated patients, and 75.4% and 73.7%, respectively, of simvastatin-treated patients. NCEP targets for non-HDL-C were achieved by 79.2% of pitavastatin-treated patients and 70.2% of simvastatin-treated patients. Both treatments were generally well tolerated, but pitavastatin 4 mg was associated with a numerically lower incidence of discontinuations due to treatment-emergent adverse events (5.8% vs. 10.5% of patients) and a lower rate of myalgia (4.1% vs. 12.3%) compared with simvastatin 40-80 mg.

CONCLUSION

Pitavastatin 4 mg provides long-term efficacy similar to that of simvastatin 40-80 mg. Further studies should ascertain whether trends suggesting that pitavastatin may exhibit a more favorable long-term tolerability profile are statistically significant.

Enhancement of antioxidant defense mechanism by pitavastatin and rosuvastatin on obesity-induced oxidative stress in Wistar rats

CONTEXT

There has been a steady increase in the epidemiology of obesity over the last 30 years with developed countries leading the way. Oxidative stress was believed to be the principle contributor to the development of cardiovascular disorders that linked with obesity.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the enhancement of antioxidant defense mechanism by Pitavastatin (PTV) and Rosuvastatin (RSV) on obesity-induced oxidative stress in Wistar rats.

METHODS

Fifty Wistar albino rats were divided into five groups. High fat diet (HFD, 20 g/day/rat) pellets were given for 28 days to produce obesity-induced oxidative stress in Wistar rats. Oral administration of HFD along with PTV, RSV and Orlistat [(HFD for 28 days + from 8th day PTV (1 mg/kg), RSV (5 mg/kg) and Orlistat (10 mg/kg) to 28th day] were given respectively.

RESULTS

Both PTV and RSV produced significant (p < 0.01) reduction in serum apolipoprotein-B (Apo-B), total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TGs), cardiac-lipid peroxides (TBARS) levels and elevation in serum high density lipoprotein (HDL-C), cardiac antioxidant enzymes [glutathione (GSH), glutathione peroxidase (GPx), glutathione reductase (GR), glutathione-S-transferase (GST), superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catase (CAT)] levels.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Results were comparable with Orlistat, a standard antiobesity drug and present initial evidence that Pitavastatin and Rosuvastatin are useful for the treatment of obesity by enhancing the antioxidant defense mechanism. However, the effects of PTV were more prominent than RSV. The present findings of Pitavastatin and Rosuvastatin raise the possibility of a new application as an antiobesity therapeutic modality.

Increased expression of endothelial lipase in symptomatic and unstable carotid plaques

The aim of this study was to evaluate endothelial lipase (EL) protein expression in advanced human carotid artery plaques (HCAP) with regard to plaque (in)stability and the incidence of symptoms. HCAP were collected from 66 patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA). The degree of plaque (in)stability was estimated by ultrasound and histology. In HCAP sections, EL expression was determined by immunostaining and the intensity was assessed on a semi-quantitative scale (low: <25%, high: >25% positive cells). Monocytes and macrophages in adjacent HCAP sections were stained with a CD163 specific antibody. High EL staining was more prevalent in histologically unstable plaques (in 33.3% of fibrous plaques, 50% of ulcerated non-complicated plaques and 79.2% of ulcerated complicated plaques; χ² test, p = 0.004) and in the symptomatic group (70.8 vs. 42.9% in the asymptomatic group; χ² test, p = 0.028). The majority of EL immunostaining was found in those HCAP regions exhibiting a strong CD163 immunostaining. EL in HCAP might be a marker and/or promoter of plaque instability and HCAP-related symptomatology.

Statins for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease

BACKGROUND

Reducing high blood cholesterol, a risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD) events in people with and without a past history of coronary heart disease (CHD) is an important goal of pharmacotherapy. Statins are the first-choice agents. Previous reviews of the effects of statins have highlighted their benefits in people with coronary artery disease. The case for primary prevention, however, is less clear.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects, both harms and benefits, of statins in people with no history of CVD.

SEARCH STRATEGY

To avoid duplication of effort, we checked reference lists of previous systematic reviews. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Issue 1, 2007), MEDLINE (2001 to March 2007) and EMBASE (2003 to March 2007). There were no language restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials of statins with minimum duration of one year and follow-up of six months, in adults with no restrictions on their total low density lipoprotein (LDL) or high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels, and where 10% or less had a history of CVD, were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently selected studies for inclusion and extracted data. Outcomes included all cause mortality, fatal and non-fatal CHD, CVD and stroke events, combined endpoints (fatal and non-fatal CHD, CVD and stroke events), change in blood total cholesterol concentration, revascularisation, adverse events, quality of life and costs. Relative risk (RR) was calculated for dichotomous data, and for continuous data pooled weighted mean differences (with 95% confidence intervals) were calculated.

MAIN RESULTS

Fourteen randomised control trials (16 trial arms; 34,272 participants) were included. Eleven trials recruited patients with specific conditions (raised lipids, diabetes, hypertension, microalbuminuria). All-cause mortality was reduced by statins (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.95) as was combined fatal and non-fatal CVD endpoints (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.79). Benefits were also seen in the reduction of revascularisation rates (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.83). Total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol were reduced in all trials but there was evidence of heterogeneity of effects. There was no clear evidence of any significant harm caused by statin prescription or of effects on patient quality of life.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Although reductions in all-cause mortality, composite endpoints and revascularisations were found with no excess of adverse events, there was evidence of selective reporting of outcomes, failure to report adverse events and inclusion of people with cardiovascular disease. Only limited evidence showed that primary prevention with statins may be cost effective and improve patient quality of life. Caution should be taken in prescribing statins for primary prevention among people at low cardiovascular risk.

Pitavastatin: a new 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme a reductase inhibitor for the treatment of hyperlipidemia

Statins have proven beneficial for reducing both primary and secondary events in patients with coronary heart disease. Tight control of serum lipid parameters in these patients is recommended by the most recent clinical guidelines. Although numerous lipid-lowering treatments are available, only a small percentage of eligible patients receive therapy and fewer achieve their lipid-lowering goals. Thus it is clear that new treatment strategies to manage patients with lipid abnormalities are warranted. Pitavastatin (Lival; Kowa Pharmaceuticals America, Montgomery, AL, USA) has been recently approved for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia and combined dyslipidemia. Pitavastatin 1-4 mg/day has shown similar low-density lipoprotein-reducing activity to other commercially available statins, including simvastatin and atorvastatin. Adverse events occurred at similar rates to other statins in clinical trials with favorable effects seen in patients with dyslipidemia and metabolic syndrome. Pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions are minimized due to the lack of significant metabolism of pitavastatin by the cytochrome P450 enzyme system, although some drugs affect its uptake into hepatocytes and should be avoided. In addition to its higher acquisition cost, pitavastatin has not been shown to improve clinical outcomes in high-risk patient populations and thus may not be the agent of choice in many patients at this time in lieu of cheaper, clinically proven alternatives.

Pitavastatin for the treatment of primary hyperlipidemia and mixed dyslipidemia

Pitavastatin is a new, synthetic member of the statin class of lipid-lowering drugs. Compared with other available statins, it has a unique cyclopropyl group on its base structure that is believed to increase 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibition by a factor of five and to significantly increase the transcription and activity of LDL receptors. Pitavastatin is primarily metabolized via glucuronidation and is not a substrate for the cytochrome P450 3A4 enzyme, thus avoiding the potential for cytochrome P450-mediated drug-drug interactions. Clinical trials have shown that pitavastatin is comparable to atorvastatin and simvastatin in improving lipid measures, and more potent than pravastatin. Pitavastatin is effective in reducing triglycerides and increasing HDL-cholesterol, so it will be particularly beneficial in treating patients with mixed dyslipidemia. Its safety and adverse event profile is similar to that of other available statins, and it has an established history of use in Asia indicating tolerability and safety for treatment lasting up to 7 years.

Pitavastatin approved for treatment of primary hypercholesterolemia and combined dyslipidemia

Pitavastatin was first developed in Japan and is expanding the regions in which it is clinically available. A considerable number of clinical studies have been conducted and published to date on the usefulness of pitavastatin for patients with primary hypercholesterolemia or combined dyslipidemia. Pitavastatin demonstrates potent low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction at low doses of 1–4 mg/day. It also affects the regression of coronary plaques, as observed in intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention studies. Moreover, the persistent, long-term high-density lipoprotein cholesterol elevation observed in the populations treated with pitavastatin is worthy of further attention. The reported improvements in lipid profiles are consistent among the studies conducted in Japan, Korea, Thailand, and Europe. In light of accumulating clinical experience worldwide, pitavastatin is now expected to establish its position for preventing and treating cardiovascular disease.

Familial hypercholesterolemia: current treatment options and patient selection for low-density lipoprotein apheresis

Options for treatment of severe heterozygous and homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia prior to the statin era were limited by significant side effects and morbidity. The advent of both the statins and technology for the selective removal of LDL via apheresis have revolutionized management but challenges remain.

New evidence on pitavastatin: efficacy and safety in clinical studies

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Many clinical trials of pitavastatin have been done since its launch. New insights on pitavastatin from these trials are summarized and evaluated.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

The results of clinical studies using pitavastatin, from 2008 to 2009, the LIVES study, the JAPAN-ACS study, the CHIBA study, the PIAT study and Phase III clinical trials in the West are reviewed.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

In the LIVES study, pitavastatin showed significant and continuous elevation of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), as well as potential decrease in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), in addition to long-term safety. Non-inferiority of pitavastatin against atorvastatin in the percentage change in plaque volume was proved in the JAPAN-ACS study. Also, comparable effects on LDL-C reduction rate of pitavastatin versus atorvastatin were confirmed in the CHIBA study and Phase III clinical trials in the West, and a greater increase in HDL-C was observed than with atorvastatin in the PIAT study.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Pitavastatin is a useful potent stain in raising HDL-C as well as in lowering of LDL-C, though a large-scale, clinical trial to confirm prevention of cardiovascular events is needed in the future.

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Low-Dose Pitavastatin Versus Atorvastatin in Patients with Hypercholesterolemia

Background:

Previous studies have shown conflicting results on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction for comparable doses of pitsvastatin and atorvastatin.

Objective:

To compare the efficacy of pitavastatin 1 mg once daily with that of atorvastatin 10 mg once daily on lipoprotein change, safety, and cost per percent LDL-C reduction.

Methods:

An 8-week, randomized, open-label, parallel trial was conducted in patients with hypercholesterolemia. One hundred patients were equally randomized to receive pitavastatin 1 mg once daily or atorvastatin 10 mg once daily; 98 completed the study. Outcomes were assessed at baseline and at the end of the study.

Results:

Pitavastatin lowered LDL-C levels from baseline by 37% compared with 46% in the atorvastatin group (p < 0.001). The reduction of total cholesterol (TC) levels from baseline was significantly different between the pitavastatin (28%) and atorvastatin (32%) groups (p = 0.005). There was no significant difference in the percentage of changes in triglyceride and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels between groups. The percentage of patients who achieved LDL-C goals according to National Cholesterol Education Program–Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines was not significantly different between the pitavastatin (74%) and atorvastatin (84%) groups (p = 0.220). In addition, both regimens were well tolerated, with no patient developing an elevation of more than 3 times the upper normal limit of alanine aminotransferase or 10 times that of creatine kinase. The monthly cost per percent LDL-C reduction in the pitavastatin group ($0.77) was about 50% lower than the cost in the atorvastatin ($1.56) group.

Conclusions:

Although pitavastatin 1 mg daily was not as effective at lowering LDL-C and TC levels as atorvastatin 10 mg daily, the number of patients achieving their LDL-C goals with pitavastatin was comparable with the number using atorvastatin. Pitavastatin 1 mg once daily may be an alternative regimen with cost-saving benefits but without a significant decrease in therapeutic benefit or increase in adverse events in patients with hypercholesterolemia.

Effects of pitavastatin on monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 in hyperlipidemic patients

The effects of statins on platelet activation markers, chemokines and adiponectin, were investigated in 135 patients with hyperlipidemia. Of the 135 hyperlipidemic patients, 63 were allocated to the simvastatin group, treated with simvastatin at the dose of 10 mg daily, and the remaining 72 were allocated to the pitavastatin group, treated with pitavastatin at the dose of 2 mg daily. Plasma levels of platelet-derived microparticles (PDMP), cell adhesion molecules (sCD40L and sP-selectin), chemokines [monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) and regulated on activation normally T-cell expressed and secreted] and adiponectin were measured at the baseline and after 6 months of treatment in both the groups. In addition, we carried out a basic study to investigate the MCP-1-dependent induction of tissue factor expression on a histiocytic cell line (U937 cells). The plasma levels of PDMP, sCD40L, sP-selectin, regulated on activation normally T-cell expressed and secreted and MCP-1 were higher, whereas those of adiponectin were lower, in the hyperlipidemic patients than in the normolipidemic controls. Plasma PDMP and sCD40L were positively correlated, whereas plasma adiponectin was negatively correlated, with the plasma levels of MCP-1. No significant differences in the plasma levels of PDMP, sCD40L, sP-selectin, regulated on activation normally T-cell expressed and secreted and MCP-1 measured before and after treatment were observed in either the simvastatin or pitavastatin group. A significant increase of the plasma adiponectin levels was observed after 6 months of treatment with pitavastatin but not after an equal duration of treatment with simvastatin. When pitavastatin-treated patients were divided into two groups according to the adiponectin response to pitavastatin treatment, significant decreases of the plasma MCP-1, PDMP and sCD40L levels were observed after pitavastatin treatment in the responder group. In the aforementioned basic study, MCP-1 by itself did not induce the expression of tissue factor on the U937 cells. However, the recombinant sCD40L-induced expression of tissue factor on U937 was enhanced by the addition of MCP-1. These findings suggest that PDMP, sCD40L and MCP-1 may participate in the development of atherothrombosis in patients with hyperlipidemia and that pitavastatin may exert an adiponectin-dependent antiatherothrombotic effect in hyperlipidemic patients.

Pitavastatin prevents intestinal ischemia/reperfusion-induced bacterial translocation and lung injury in atherosclerotic rats with hypoadiponectinemia

BACKGROUND

Atherosclerosis with hypoadiponectinemia can be further aggravated by intestinal ischemia/reperfusion (II/R)-induced injuries, such as bacterial translocation and lung injury. We investigated the effect of statin administration on the risk of II/R-induced injury in atherosclerotic rats with hypoadiponectinemia.

METHODS

Wistar rats were divided into 4 groups: (1) the Normal group (normal diet), (2) the Chol group (2% high cholesterol diet), (3) the St-1w group, and (4) the St-2w group (Chol group plus pitavastatin administration for 1 or 2 weeks, respectively). The serum concentrations of lipids and adiponectin were measured preoperatively. After midline laparotomy (time, T0), the superior mesenteric artery was occluded with a microvascular clamp for 30 min, followed by 360 min of reperfusion (T1). Intestinal and lung nitric oxide (NO) concentrations were measured. Intestinal injury was assessed by microcirculatory flow, histology, and permeability. Bacterial translocation was assessed by analysis of serum peptidoglycan concentration. Lung injury was assessed by histologic examination, pulmonary permeability index, and wet/dry lung weight ratio.

RESULTS

The 2-week administration of statins with high-cholesterol feeding (St-2w group) improved hypoadiponectinemia to levels similar to those of the Normal group. Intestinal and lung NO concentrations were significantly lower at T1 in the Normal and St-2w groups than in the Chol group. Statin administration improved poor recovery of intestinal microcirculatory flow in the Chol group. At T1, intestinal and lung injuries were significantly aggravated and serum peptidoglycan concentration was significantly elevated in the Chol group compared with the Normal and St-2w groups. The 1-week administration of statins had no significant influence on serum adiponectin levels, tissue NO concentration, or tissue injury.

CONCLUSION

Administration of pitavastatin reduces the risk of II/R-induced injury in atherosclerotic rats with hypoadiponectinemia by improving hypoadiponectinemia and inhibiting inducible NO synthase-produced NO. Furthermore, preoperative improvement of hypoadiponectinemia may be important as an index of the protective effect of pitavastatin for II/R-induced injury in atherosclerotic rats with hypoadiponectinemia.

The effects of pitavastatin, eicosapentaenoic acid and combined therapy on platelet-derived microparticles and adiponectin in hyperlipidemic, diabetic patients

Platelet-derived microparticles (PDMP) play an important role in the pathogenesis of diabetic vasculopathy, and statins or eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) have been shown to have a beneficial effect on atherosclerosis in hyperlipidemic patients. However, the influence of EPA and statins on PDMP and adiponectin in atherosclerosis is poorly understood. We investigated the effect of pitavastatin and EPA on circulating levels of PDMP and adiponectin in hyperlipidemic patients with type II diabetes. A total of 191 hyperlipidemic patients with type II diabetes were divided into three groups: group A received pitavastatin 2 mg once daily (n = 64), group B received EPA 1800 mg daily (n = 55) and group C received both drugs (n = 72). PDMP and adiponectin were measured by ELISA at baseline and after 3 and 6 months of drug treatment. Thirty normolipidemic patients were recruited as healthy controls. PDMP levels prior to treatment in hyperlipidemic patients with diabetes were higher than levels in healthy controls (10.4 +/- 1.9 vs. 3.1 +/- 0.4 U/ml, p < 0.0001), and adiponectin levels were lower than controls (3.20 +/- 0.49 vs. 5.98 +/- 0.42 microg/ml, p < 0.0001). PDMP decreased significantly in group B (before vs. 6M, 10.6 +/- 2.0 vs. 8.0 +/- 1.7 U/ml, p < 0.01), but not in group A (before vs. 6M, 9.4 +/- 1.9 vs. 9.6 +/- 1.7 U/ml, not significant). In contrast, group A exhibited a significant increase in adiponectin levels after treatment (before vs. 6M, 3.29 +/- 0.51 vs. 4.16 +/- 0.60 microg/ml, p < 0.001). Furthermore, group C exhibited significant improvement in both PDMP and adiponectin levels after treatment (PDMP, before vs. 6M, 11.2 +/- 2.0 vs. 4.5 +/- 2.7 U/ml, p < 0.001; adiponectin, before vs. 6M, 3.24 +/- 0.41 vs. 4.02 +/- 0.70 microg/ml, p < 0.001). Reductions of PDMP in combined therapy were significantly greater than those observed with EPA alone (p < 0.05 by ANOVA). In addition, soluble CD40 ligand exhibited almost the same change as PDMP in all therapy groups. These results suggest that pitavastatin possesses an adiponectin-dependent antiatherosclerotic effect, and this drug is able to enhance the anti-platelet effect of EPA. The combination therapy of pitavastatin and EPA may be beneficial for the prevention of vascular complication in hyperlipidemic patients with type II diabetes.

A 52-week, randomized, open-label, parallel-group comparison of the tolerability and effects of pitavastatin and atorvastatin on high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and glucose metabolism in Japanese patients with elevated levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and glucose intolerance

BACKGROUND

Statin therapy has been found to produce substantial reductions in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels, resulting in a reduced risk for cardiovascular events. Recently, research interest has focused on modification of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels for the potential prevention of cardiovascular events. The effects of pitavastatin and atorvastatin on HDL-C have not been directly compared.

OBJECTIVES

This study compared the effects of pitavastatin and atorvastatin on HDL-C and other lipids and glucose metabolism in Japanese patients with elevated LDL-C levels and glucose intolerance. The tolerability of the 2 treatments was also compared.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, open-label, parallel-group trial. Patients with LDL-C levels>or=140 mg/dL and glucose intolerance (defined according to Japanese criteria for borderline diabetes and World Health Organization criteria for impaired fasting glucose and impaired glucose tolerance) were randomly assigned to receive either pitavastatin 2 mg/d or atorvastatin 10 mg/d for 52 weeks. Levels of serum lipids and lipoproteins and measures of glucose metabolism (fasting insulin, fasting glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin, and homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance) were obtained at baseline and at 8, 26, and 52 weeks of treatment. The effect of study drug on glucose metabolism was evaluated as a tolerability outcome. Tolerability was further assessed based on adverse events, either spontaneously reported or elicited by questioning; physical examination findings; and clinical laboratory test results. Study physicians rated the relationship of adverse events to study medication as unrelated, suspected, or probable.

RESULTS

Two hundred seven patients were enrolled in the study, and efficacy was evaluated in 173 patients (88 pitavastatin, 85 atorvastatin). Thirty-four patients were excluded for reasons including failure to start medication or lack of >or=6 months of follow-up. Women accounted for 62% (108/173) of the evaluable population, which had a mean age of 63.3 years and a mean weight of 63.0 kg; 89% (154/173) had diabetes mellitus. The percent change in HDL-C levels was significantly greater in the pitavastatin group compared with the atorvastatin group (8.2 vs 2.9, respectively; P=0.031), as was the percent change in apolipoprotein (Apo) A-I (5.1 vs 0.6; P=0.019). The percent change in LDL-C levels was significantly lower with atorvastatin compared with pitavastatin (-40.1 vs -33.0, respectively; P=0.002), as were the percent changes in non-HDL-C (-37.4 vs -31.1; P=0.004), Apo B (-35.1 vs -28.2; P<0.001), and Apo E (-28.1 vs -17.8; P<0.001). The significant results for these parameters were unchanged when all 189 subjects who received>or=1 dose of study medication were included in the analysis, using last-value-carried-forward methodology. There were no significant differences between treatments with respect to the measures of glucose metabolism. Both statins appeared to be well tolerated. Adverse events occurred in 9% (9/96) of the pitavastatin group and 14% (13/93) of the atorvastatin group (P=NS). Two patients in the pitavastatin group and none in the atorvastatin group had an alanine aminotransferase value>3 times the upper limit of normal (P=NS).

CONCLUSIONS

In these patients with elevated LDL-C levels and glucose intolerance, 52 weeks of treatment with pitavastatin 2 mg/d was associated with significantly greater increases in HDL-C and Apo A-I levels than atorvastatin 10 mg/d. Both treatments were well tolerated.

Effects of pitavastatin on adiponectin in patients with hyperlipidemia

The effects of treatment with pitavastatin on inflammatory and platelet activation markers and adiponectin in 117 patients with hyperlipidemia were investigated to determine whether pitavastatin may prevent the progression of atherosclerotic changes in hyperlipidemic patients. Adiponectin levels prior to pitavastatin treatment in hyperlipidemic patients with and without diabetes were lower than levels in normolipidemic controls. Both total cholesterol and the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol decreased significantly after pitavastatin administration. Additionally, hyperlipidemic patients with or without type 2 diabetes exhibited a significant increase in adiponectin levels 6 months after pitavastatin treatment (diabetes: 3.52 +/- 0.80 vs. 4.52 +/- 0.71 microg/ml, p < 0.001; no diabetes: 3.48 +/- 0.71 vs. 4.23 +/- 0.82 microg/ml, p < 0.05). However, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, platelet-derived microparticle and soluble P-selectin did not exhibit any differences before or after pitavastatin administration. Levels of adiponectin significantly increased after pitavastatin administration in the group of lower soluble P-selectin (soluble P-selectin before pitavastatin treatment <200 ng/ml). These results suggest that pitavastatin possesses an adiponectin-increasing effect in patients with hyperlipidemia and this effect is influenced by intensive platelet activation.

Effects of CoQ10 supplementation on plasma lipoprotein lipid, CoQ10 and liver and muscle enzyme levels in hypercholesterolemic patients treated with atorvastatin: A randomized double-blind study

The long-term efficacy and safety of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) have been established in large multicenter trials. Inhibition of this enzyme, however, results in decreased synthesis of cholesterol and other products downstream of mevalonate, such as CoQ10 or dolichol. This was a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study that examined the effects of CoQ10 and placebo in hypercholesterolemic patients treated by atorvastatin. Eligible patients were given 10mg/day of atorvastatin for 16 weeks. Half of the patients (n=24) were supplemented with 100mg/day of CoQ10, while the other half (n=25) were given the placebo. Serum LDL-C levels in the CoQ10 group decreased by 43%, while in the placebo group by 49%. The HDL-C increment was more striking in the CoQ10 group than in the placebo group. All patients showed definite reductions of plasma CoQ10 levels in the placebo group, by 42%. All patients supplemented with CoQ10 showed striking increases in plasma CoQ10 by 127%. In conclusion atorvastatin definitely decreased plasma CoQ10 levels and supplementation with CoQ10 increased their levels. These changes in plasma CoQ10 levels showed no relation to the changes in serum AST, ALT and CK levels. Further studies are needed, however, for the evaluation of CoQ10 supplementation in statin therapy.

Correlation between adiponectin and reduction of cell adhesion molecules after pitavastatin treatment in hyperlipidemic patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

The aim of this study was to determine whether pitavastatin may prevent the progression of atherosclerotic changes in hyperlipidemic patients. Seventy-five hyperlipidemic patients with and without type 2 diabetes were enrolled to receive pitavastatin 2 mg daily. Cell adhesion molecules (sCD40L, sP-selectin, sE-selectin, and sL-selectin), chemokines (MCP-1 and RANTES) and adiponectin were measured at baseline and after 3 and 6 months of pitavastatin treatment. Adiponectin levels prior to pitavastatin treatment in hyperlipidemic patients with and without diabetes were lower than levels in normolipidemic controls. Both total cholesterol and the LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) decreased significantly after pitavastatin administration. Additionally, hyperlipidemic patients with type 2 diabetes exhibited a significant increase in adiponectin levels after pitavastatin treatment (before vs. 3 months, 6 months, 2.81+/-0.95 vs. 3.84+/-0.84 microg/ml (p<0.01), 4.61+/-1.15 mug/ml (p<0.001)). Furthermore, hyperlipidemic diabetics exhibited significant decreases in sE-selectin and sL-selectin levels after 6 months of pitavastatin treatment (sE-selectin, before vs. 6 months, 74+/-21 vs. 51+/-10 ng/ml, p<0.05; sL-selectin, before vs. 6 months, 896+/-141 vs. 814+/-129 ng/ml, p<0.05). In addition, adiponectin showed significant correlation with sE-selectin and sL-selectin in diabetic hyperlipidemia. However, MCP-1, RANTES and sCD40L did not exhibit any differences before or after pitavastatin administration. These results suggest that pitavastatin possesses an adiponectin-dependent anti-atherosclerotic effect in hyperlipidemic patients with type 2 diabetes in addition to its lowering effects on total cholesterol and LDL-C.

Postischemic Alterations of BDNF, NGF, HSP 70 and Ubiquitin Immunoreactivity in the Gerbil Hippocampus: Pharmacological Approach

1. We investigated the immunohistochemical alterations of BDNF, NGF, HSP 70 and ubiquitin in the hippocampus 1 h to 14 days after transient cerebral ischemia in gerbils. We also examined the effect of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor pitavastatin against the changes of BDNF, NGF, HSP 70 and ubiquitin in the hippocampus after cerebral ischemia in the hippocampus after ischemia. 2. The transient cerebral ischemia was carried out by clamping the carotid arteries with aneurismal clips for 5 min. 3. In the present study, the alteration of HSP 70 and ubiquitin immunoreactivity in the hippocampal CA1 sector was more pronounced than that of BDNF and NGF immunoreactivity after transient cerebral ischemia. In double-labeled immunostainings, BDNF, NGF and ubiquitin immunostaining was observed both in GFAP-positive astrocytes and MRF-1-positive microglia in the hippocampal CA1 sector after ischemia. Furthermore, prophylactic treatment with pitavastatin prevented the damage of neurons with neurotrophic factor and stress proteins in the hippocampal CA1 sector after ischemia. 4. These findings suggest that the expression of stress protein including HSP 70 and ubiquitin may play a key role in the protection against the hippocampal CA1 neuronal damage after transient cerebral ischemia in comparison with the expression of neurotrophic factor such as BDNF and NGF. The present findings also suggest that the glial BDNF, NGF and ubiquitin may play some role for helping surviving neurons after ischemia. Furthermore, our present study indicates that prophylactic treatment with pitavastatin can prevent the damage of neurons with neurotrophic factor and stress proteins in the hippocampal CA1 sector after transient cerebral ischemia. Thus our study provides further valuable information for the pathogenesis after transient cerebral ischemia.

Elevated serum levels of proinflammatory cytokines and biomarkers of matrix remodeling in never-treated patients with familial hypercholesterolemia

BACKGROUND

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a common inherited disorder of lipoprotein metabolism, whose origin involves mutations in the gene coding for the low-density lipoprotein receptor protein. Although FH is monogenic, wide variation occurs in the onset and severity of atherosclerosis in these patients.

METHODS

Since data on levels of inflammatory proteins and/or active factors in FH patients who have never received lipid-lowering treatment are lacking, serum levels of MMP-3, active MMP-9 and TIMP-1 as well as pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-alpha, IL-18) were determined in never-treated homozygous FH Moroccan patients (n=4) and compared to those of heterozygous FH subjects (n=7) and of healthy control subjects (n=5).

RESULTS

When compared to controls, homozygous FH patients exhibited levels of active MMP-9 and TIMP-1 (p<0.05), and of both high sensitive-CRP and IL-18 which were significantly elevated (p<0.05 and p<0.01, respectively). In heterozygous FH patients, intermediate values between FH homozygotes and healthy controls were observed for these markers, with the exception of MMP-9 activity whose levels were significantly elevated (p<0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed a positive correlation between apolipoprotein B, TIMP-1 and IL-18 levels, and between hs-CRP and IL-18 (p<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the sample size of this FH group was limited, our data suggest that nontreated homozygous FH patients, and to a lesser degree heterozygous FH patients, exhibit not only a markedly proinflammatory vascular state but also pronounced extracellular matrix remodeling, as reflected by elevated circulating levels of inflammatory cytokines and MMPs.

Alterations of interneurons of the gerbil hippocampus after transient cerebral ischemia: effect of pitavastatin

We investigated the immunohistochemical alterations of parvalbumin (PV)-expressing interneurons in the hippocampus after transient cerebral ischemia in gerbils in comparison with neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS)-expressing interneurons. We also examined the effect of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitor pitavastatin against the damage of neurons and interneurons in the hippocampus after cerebral ischemia. Severe neuronal damage was observed in the hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons 5 and 14 days after ischemia. The PV immunoreactivity was unchanged up to 2 days after ischemia. At 5 and 14 days after ischemia, in contrast, a conspicuous reduction of PV immunoreactivity was observed in interneurons of the hippocampal CA1 sector. Furthermore, a significant decrease of PV immunoreactivity was found in interneurons of the hippocampal CA3 sector. No damage of nNOS-immunopositive interneurons was detected in the gerbil hippocampus up to 1 day after ischemia. Thereafter, a decrease of nNOS immunoreactive interneurons was found in the hippocampal CA1 sector up to 14 days after ischemia. Pitavastatin significantly prevented the neuronal cell loss in the hippocampal CA1 sector 5 days after ischemia. Our immunohistochemical study also showed that pitavastatin prevented significant decrease of PV- and nNOS-positive interneurons in the hippocampus after ischemia. Double-labeled immunostainings showed that PV immunoreactivity was not found in nNOS-immunopositive interneurons of the brain. The present study demonstrates that cerebral ischemia can cause a loss of both PV- and nNOS-immunoreactive interneurons in the hippocampal CA1 sector. Our findings also show that the damage to nNOS-immunopositive interneurons may precede the neuronal cell loss in the hippocampal CA1 sector after ischemia and nNOS-positive interneurons may play some role in the pathogenesis of cerebral ischemic diseases. Furthermore, our present study indicates that pitavastatin can prevent the damage of interneurons in the hippocampus after cerebral ischemia. Thus, our study provides valuable information for the pathogenesis after cerebral ischemia.

A randomized, open-label study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pitavastatin compared with simvastatin in korean patients with hypercholesterolemia

BACKGROUND

Pitavastatin is a 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor used to treat hypercholesterolemia.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of pitavastatin versus those of simvastatin in Korean patients with hypercholesterolemia.

METHODS

This was an 8-week, multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, Phase III clinical trial. Male and female Korean patients with hypercholesterolemia who were between the ages of 20 and 75 years and who had a fasting triglyceride level <600 mg/dL and a low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level >130 mg/dL after a 4-week dietary lead-in period were eligible for entry. Eligible patients were randomized into 2 groups in a 1:1 ratio. Patients received pitavastatin 2 mg once daily or simvastatin 20 mg once daily for 8 weeks. The medication was administered initially for 4 weeks, and an additional 4 weeks of study medication was prescribed at week 4. The final visit was conducted 8 weeks after randomization.

RESULTS

Of the 104 patients randomized to treatment, 95 patients (59 women; 36 men) completed the study (49 in the pitavastatin group [mean age, 59.9 years] and 46 in the simvastatin group [mean age, 56.4 years]). No significant difference was found between groups with respect to patient age, sex, or body mass index. There was no significant difference in the percent decrease in LDL cholesterol levels (mean [SD], 38.2% [11.6%] decrease for the pitavastatin group vs 39.4% [12.9%] decrease for the simvastatin group [P = 0.648]). Also, there were no significant differences between the 2 study groups in the percent changes in total cholesterol, triglyceride, or high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels from baseline to study end. No significant difference was observed for the proportion of patients who achieved the LDL cholesterol goal of the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III: 93.9% (46/49) of patients in the pitavastatin group and 91.3% (42/46) of patients in the simvastatin group (P = 0.709) met the target level. At least 1 clinical adverse event and at least 1 adverse drug reaction were observed in 25.0% (13/52) and 11.5% (6/52), respectively, of patients in the pitavastatin group, and 37.3% (19/51) and 23.5% (12/51), respectively, in the simvastatin group; this difference was not statistically significant. The most common adverse event was an elevation in creatine kinase levels >2 times the upper limit of normal in 3.8% of pitavastatin-treated patients and 9.8% of simvastatin-treated patients (P = 0.269). There were no serious adverse drug reactions observed in either group.

CONCLUSION

The HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor pitavastatin was found to be noninferior to simvastatin in terms of reducing LDL cholesterol, total cholesterol, and triglyceride levels, and increasing HDL cholesterol levels, in Korean patients with hypercholesterolemia after 8 weeks of treatment.

Contribution of vascular NAD(P)H oxidase to endothelial dysfunction in heart failure and the therapeutic effects of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor

BACKGROUND

The vascular NAD(P)H oxidase-derived superoxide anion (O(2)-) plays a crucial role in the pathological progression of hypertension and atherosclerosis, and HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) have vascular antioxidant effects. However, it is unclear whether the vascular NAD(P)H oxidase is involved in the endothelial dysfunction of congestive heart failure (CHF) and whether HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) exert their vasoprotective effects in CHF. The present study examined both the involvement of vascular NAD(P)H oxidase in endothelial dysfunction in dogs with tachycardia-induced CHF and the therapeutic effect of a statin (pitavastatin).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Femoral blood flow (FBF) responses to acetylcholine was significantly impaired in the CHF group, but were improved by pitavastatin. Vascular O(2)- production, NAD(P)H oxidase activity and Nox4 and p47phox expression were significantly elevated in CHF compared with the normal group. The elevated O(2)-production in the CHF group was suppressed by the NAD(P)H oxidase inhibitor, apocynin, to the normal level. In contrast, neither the gene expression nor the activity of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) differed significantly between the normal and CHF groups. However, pitavastatin significantly suppressed O(2)- production, NAD(P)H oxidase activity and Nox4 and p47phox expression and increased eNOS expression and activity compared with the CHF group.

CONCLUSIONS

The activated vascular NAD(P)H oxidase contributes to endothelial dysfunction in CHF, which was partly improved by pitavastatin via its inhibition of NAD(P)H oxidase.

Pitavastatin

The growing number of trials that have highlighted the benefit of intensive lowering of total- and low density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol levels especially with statins has created a need for more efficacious agents. Pitavastatin is a new synthetic 3-hydroxy-3-methyl glutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor, which was developed, and has been available in Japan since July 2003. Metabolism of pitavastatin by the cytochrome P450 (CYP) system is minimal, principally through CYP 2C9, with little involvement of the CYP 3A4 isoenzyme, potentially reducing the risk of drug-drug interactions between pitavastatin and other drugs known to inhibit CYP enzymes. To date, human and animal studies have shown pitavastatin to be potentially as effective in lowering LDL-cholesterol levels as rosuvastatin; although, head-to-head studies are yet to be conducted.

Reduction of Serum Ubiquinol-10 and Ubiquinone-10 Levels by Atorvastatin in Hypercholesterolemic Patients

Reduction of serum cholesterol levels with statin therapy decreases the risk of coronary heart disease. Inhibition of HMG-CoA reductase by statin results in decreased synthesis of cholesterol and other products downstream of mevalonate, which may produce adverse effects in statin therapy. We studied the reductions of serum ubiquinol-10 and ubiquinone-10 levels in hypercholesterolemic patients treated with atorvastatin. Fourteen patients were treated with 10 mg/day of atorvastatin, and serum lipid, ubiquinol-10 and ubiquinone-10 levels were measured before and after 8 weeks of treatment. Serum total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol levels decreased significantly. All patients showed definite reductions of serum ubiquinol-10 and ubiquinone-10 levels, and mean levels of serum ubiquinol-10 and ubiquinone-10 levels decreased significantly from 0.81 +/- 0.21 to 0.46 +/- 0.10 microg/ml (p < 0.0001), and from 0.10 +/- 0.06 to 0.06 +/- 0.02 microg/ml (p = 0.0008), respectively. Percent reductions of ubiquinol-10 and those of total cholesterol showed a positive correlation (r = 0.627, p = 0.0165). As atorvastatin reduces serum ubiquinol-10 as well as serum cholesterol levels in all patients, it is imperative that physicians are forewarned about the risks associated with ubiquinol-10 depletion.

Functional Interplay Between the Macrophage Scavenger Receptor Class B Type I and Pitavastatin (NK-104)

Background— Scavenger receptor class B type I (SR-BI), a receptor for high-density lipoprotein (HDL), plays an important role in the bidirectional cholesterol exchange between cells and HDL particles and the atherosclerotic lesion development. Enhancement of SR-BI expression significantly reduces, whereas lack of SR-BI expression accelerates, the atherosclerotic lesion development in proatherogenic mice. Statins, a class of inhibitors for 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase, significantly suppress de novo cholesterol synthesis and reduce the incidence of coronary heart disease. Statins also display multiple pleiotropic effects independently of cholesterol synthesis in the vascular cells. Here, we investigated the effects of pitavastatin (NK-104), a newly synthesized statin, on macrophage SR-BI expression.

Methods and Results— We found that pitavastatin significantly increased SR-BI mRNA and protein expression in a macrophage cell line in a concentration- and time-dependent manner. It also increased SR-BI expression in both mouse peritoneal and human monocyte-derived macrophages. Associated with increased SR-BI expression, pitavastatin enhanced macrophage HDL binding, uptake of [ 14 C]cholesteryl oleate/HDL, and efflux of [ 3 H]cholesterol to HDL. Pitavastatin abolished the inhibition of macrophage SR-BI expression by cholesterol biosynthetic intermediates. It also restored SR-BI expression inhibited by lipopolysaccharide and tumor necrosis factor-α through its inactivation of the transcription factor nuclear factor-κB.

Conclusions— Our data demonstrate that pitavastatin can stimulate macrophage SR-BI expression by reduction of cholesterol biosynthetic intermediates and antiinflammatory action and suggest additional pleiotropic effects of statins by which they may reduce the incidence of coronary heart disease.

Clinical efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin in Japanese patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia

Rosuvastatin is a new statin that has been shown to produce substantial dose-dependent reductions in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in Western and Japanese hypercholesterolemic patients. Rosuvastatin efficacy and safety were assessed in an open-label, dose-titration trial of 37 Japanese patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. After an 8-week dietary lead-in period, patients received rosuvastatin on the following schedule: 10 mg/day during weeks 0-6; 20 mg/day during weeks 6-12, and 40 mg/day for weeks 12-18. Mean percentage reductions from baseline in LDL-C (49.2-56.7%), total cholesterol (39.4-45.4%), and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) (46.7-54.3%) were highly significant at each dose (p < 0.0001). Similar significant reductions in triglycerides (18.2-25.0%; p < 0.006) and increases in HDL-C (9.6-13.6%; p < 0.005) were observed. Rosuvastatin was well tolerated. Two patients withdrew from the study because of adverse events unrelated to the study treatment. No patients had clinically significant elevations in liver transaminases. Two patients exhibited a single increase in creatine kinase (one unrelated to study treatment, the other possibly related) with no muscle symptoms. Rosuvastatin produced significant beneficial changes in all lipid parameters in Japanese patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia and was well tolerated.

Markers of Inflammation and Rapid Coronary Artery Disease Progression in Patients With Stable Angina Pectoris

BACKGROUND

Both endothelial cell activation and macrophage activation play a significant role in atherogenesis and atheromatous plaque vulnerability and may determine rapid coronary artery disease (CAD) progression. We sought to assess the association between serum inflammatory markers and rapid CAD progression in patients with chronic stable angina pectoris.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We studied 124 chronic stable angina pectoris patients (84 men; mean age, 61+/-10 years) who were on a waiting list for coronary angioplasty for a mean time of 4.8+/-2.4 months. CAD progression was defined as > or =10% diameter reduction of a pre-existing stenosis > or =50%, > or =30% diameter reduction of a stenosis <50%, development of a new stenosis > or =30% in a previously normal segment, or progression of any stenosis to total occlusion. CAD progression occurred in 35 patients (28%). After adjustment with binary logistic regression, neopterin (P<0.001), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (P=0.017), matrix metalloproteinase-9 (P=0.002), soluble intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (P<0.001), and previous history of unstable angina (P=0.01) were independent predictors of rapid CAD progression. The association between rapid disease progression and inflammatory markers remained significant even when presence of complex lesions was introduced into the multivariate model.

CONCLUSIONS

Rapid CAD progression in patients with stable angina pectoris is associated with increased C-reactive protein levels and raised concentrations of biochemical markers of endothelial and macrophage activation.

Effect of pitavastatin against expression of S100beta protein in the gerbil hippocampus after transient cerebral ischaemia

AIM AND METHODS

We investigated the immunohistochemical alterations of S100beta-, S100-, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP)- and isolectin B4-positive cells in the hippocampus after 5 min of transient cerebral ischaemia in gerbils. We also examined the effect of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor pitavastatin against neuronal damage in the hippocampal CA1 sector after ischaemia.

RESULTS

Severe neuronal damage was observed in the hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons from 5 days after ischaemia. GFAP-positive cells increased gradually in the hippocampus from 5 days after ischaemia. Five and 14 days after ischaemia, significant increases in the number of GFAP-positive cells and isolectin B4-positive cells were observed in the hippocampal CA1 and CA3 sector. Mild increases in the number of S100 and S100beta-positive cells were observed in the hippocampal CA1 sector from 1 h to 2 days after ischaemia. Thereafter, S100beta-positive cells increased in the hippocampal CA1 sector after ischaemia, whereas S100-positive cells decreased in this region. In our double-labelled immunostainings, S100 and S100beta immunoreactivity was found in GFAP-positive astrocytes, but not in isolectin B4-positive microglia. Pharmacological study showed that HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, pitavastatin, can protect against the hippocampal CA1 neuronal damage after ischaemia. This drug also prevented increases in the number of GFAP-positive astrocytes, isolectin B4-positive microglia, S100-positive astrocytes and S100beta-positive astrocytes after ischaemia.

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrates that pitavastatin can decrease the neuronal damage of hippocampal CA1 sector after ischaemia. This beneficial effect may be, at least in part, mediated by inhibiting the expression of astrocytic activation in the hippocampus at the acute phase after ischaemia. Thus the modulation of astrocytic activation may offer a novel therapeutic strategy of ischaemic brain damage.

Pitavastatin, a 3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A Reductase Inhibitor, Blocks Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell Populated-Collagen Lattice Contraction

Constrictive arterial remodeling plays a major role in lumen narrowing following angioplasty. We investigated the effect of pitavastatin, a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor, on vascular smooth muscle cell (SMC)-populated collagen lattice contraction, an in vitro model of vascular contraction. Type I collagen gel contraction by SMCs, which are cultured in collagen gel, was used as a model of vascular remodeling. Pitavastatin pretreatment inhibited 10% serum- or platelet-derived growth factor-BB (PDGF)-induced SMC-mediated collagen lattice contraction in a concentration-dependent manner. The effect of pitavastatin was prevented by mevalonate or geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate, but not by squalene, a precursor of cholesterol, or farnesyl pyrophosphate. The serum- or PDGF-induced SMC-mediated collagen gel contraction was inhibited by GGTI-298, a geranylgeranyltransferase inhibitor, C3 exoenzyme, an inhibitor of Rho, or Y27634, a Rho kinase inhibitor, but not by FTI-277, a farnesyltransferase inhibitor. Serum or PDGF treatment increased the stress fiber organization in SMCs, which was blocked by the pitavastatin pretreatment. Pitavastatin had no effect on the serum- and PDGF-induced lamelliopodia extension of SMC. These results may suggest that pitavastatin attenuates SMC-mediated collagen gel contraction probably via an inhibition of geranylgeranylated Rho protein and a disruption of actin cytoskeletal reorganization.

New drugs for the treatment of hypercholesterolaemia

Endogenous and exogenous pathways determine plasma levels of cholesterol and lipoproteins. Plasma cholesterol levels and coronary heart disease risk can be reduced pharmacologically by decreasing cholesterol synthesis, increasing its elimination and/or reducing its absorption from the intestine. The more profound knowledge about cholesterol homeostasis has allowed the development of several lipid-lowering drugs with different mechanisms of action, with the purpose of reducing both morbidity and mortality associated with coronary heart disease. Two new and more potent 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors (statins), also called superstatins (rosuvastatin and pitavastatin), are being studied for their ability to improve lipid profiles. Rosuvastatin is a potent, hepato-selective and relatively hydrophilic statin with a low propensity for muscle toxicity and drug interactions. Pitavastatin is another statin with a high oral bioavailability and minimal propensity for cytochrome p450-mediated drug interactions. Rosuvastatin seems to be more potent than other available statins while pitavastatin presents with a similar potency to that of atorvastatin. Another promising approach for lowering total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels is inhibition of cholesterol absorption. A wide variety of new agents with the capacity for inhibiting the intestinal cholesterol absorption is currently being investigated. Ezetimibe is a selective cholesterol absorption inhibitor whose clinical efficacy has been recently demonstrated both in monotherapy and in combination with other lipid-lowering drugs. Colesevelam, a new bile acid sequestrant, has shown a clinical efficacy similar to that of other resins, with minimal gastrointestinal side effects, improving tolerability and patient compliance. Other lipid-lowering drugs with the ability to act at the enterocyte level, such as avasimibe and implitapide, are currently being investigated in humans.

Pitavastatin: efficacy and safety profiles of a novel synthetic HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor

The use of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors, statins, has been shown to reduce major cardiovascular events in both primary and secondary prevention, and statins became one of the most widely prescribed classes of drugs throughout the world. Previously, statins have been well tolerated and have shown favorable safety profiles. However, the voluntary withdrawal of cerivastatin from the market because of a disproportionate number of reports of rhabdomyolysis-associated deaths drew attention to the pharmacokinetic profile of statins, which may possibly have been related to serious drug-drug interactions. Pitavastatin (NK-104, previously called itavastatin or nisvastatin, Kowa Company Ltd., Tokyo) is a novel, fully synthetic statin, which has a potent cholesterol-lowering action. The short-term and long-term lipid-modifying effects of pitavastatin have already been investigated in subjects with primary hypercholesterolemia, heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, hypertriglyceridemia, and type-2 diabetes mellitus accompanied by hyperlipidemia. Within the range of daily doses from 1 to 4 mg, the efficacy of pitavastatin as a lipid-lowering drug seems to be similar, or potentially superior, to that of atorvastatin. According to the results of pharmacokinetic studies, pitavastatin showed favorable and promising safety profile; it was only slightly metabolized by the cytochrome P450 (CYP) system, its lactone form had no inhibitory effects on the CYP3A4-mediated metabolism of concomitantly administered drugs; P-glycoprotein-mediated transport did not play a major role in its disposition, and pitavastatin did not inhibit P-glycoprotein activity. It could be concluded that pitavastatin could provide a new and potentially better therapeutic choice for lipid-modifying therapy than do the currently available statins. The efficacy and safety of higher dose treatment, as well as its long-term effects in the prevention of coronary artery disease, should be further investigated.