Participation of the bacteriophage Mu A protein and host factors in the initiation of Mu DNA synthesis in vitro

Frequent nonhomologous replacement of replicative helicase loaders by viruses in Vibrionaceae

Several microbial genomes lack textbook-defined essential genes. If an essential gene is absent from a genome, then an evolutionarily independent gene of unknown function complements its function. Here, we identified frequent nonhomologous replacement of an essential component of DNA replication initiation, a replicative helicase loader gene, in Vibrionaceae. Our analysis of Vibrionaceae genomes revealed two genes with unknown function, named vdhL1 and vdhL2, that were substantially enriched in genomes without the known helicase-loader genes. These genes showed no sequence similarities to genes with known function but encoded proteins structurally similar with a viral helicase loader. Analyses of genomic syntenies and coevolution with helicase genes suggested that vdhL1/2 encodes a helicase loader. The in vitro assay showed that Vibrio harveyi VdhL1 and Vibrio ezurae VdhL2 promote the helicase activity of DnaB. Furthermore, molecular phylogenetics suggested that vdhL1/2 were derived from phages and replaced an intrinsic helicase loader gene of Vibrionaceae over 20 times. This high replacement frequency implies the host's advantage in acquiring a viral helicase loader gene.

Viral hijacking of a replicative helicase loader and its implications for helicase loading control and phage replication

Replisome assembly requires the loading of replicative hexameric helicases onto origins by AAA+ ATPases. How loader activity is appropriately controlled remains unclear. Here, we use structural and biochemical analyses to establish how an antimicrobial phage protein interferes with the function of the Staphylococcus aureus replicative helicase loader, DnaI. The viral protein binds to the loader’s AAA+ ATPase domain, allowing binding of the host replicative helicase but impeding loader self-assembly and ATPase activity. Close inspection of the complex highlights an unexpected locus for the binding of an interdomain linker element in DnaI/DnaC-family proteins. We find that the inhibitor protein is genetically coupled to a phage-encoded homolog of the bacterial helicase loader, which we show binds to the host helicase but not to the inhibitor itself. These findings establish a new approach by which viruses can hijack host replication processes and explain how loader activity is internally regulated to prevent aberrant auto-association.

DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.14158.001

Cells must copy their DNA in order to grow and divide. DNA replication begins when a small region of the DNA double helix is unwound to expose single strands of DNA. A protein called a helicase is then shepherded onto the unwound DNA regions by other proteins known as loaders. Once loaded, the helicase can unwind long stretches of the chromosome in which the DNA is packaged, producing the template required by the replication machinery to duplicate the DNA. This process must be accurately executed to avoid generating errors that could damage the DNA and potentially cause cells to die.

DnaI is a helicase loader protein that is found in some types of bacteria. In the disease-causing bacterial species Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), an inhibitor protein from a virus that infects the bacteria can interact with DnaI and halt S. aureus DNA replication, leading to cell death. However, it has not been understood how this viral protein controls the activity of the loader molecules.

DnaI consists of three regions: one that binds to the helicase, a short 'linker' region, and a third element that harnesses chemical energy (in the form of a small high-energy molecule called ATP) to drive the loader’s activity. Using biochemical and structural techniques, Hood and Berger now show that the viral inhibitor protein interacts with the DnaI loader from S. aureus by binding to the loader's ATP-binding region. When the two proteins are bound together, the loader can still bind to its target helicase but it cannot interact with other loader molecules. This defect prevents the loaders from self-assembling into a structure that is required for them to load the replicative helicase.

Hood and Berger also found that the region of DnaI targeted by the inhibitor is important for normally ensuring that the loader molecules self-assemble at the correct place and time. A second unexpected discovery was that the virus encodes its own helicase loader, which binds to the bacterial helicase but not to the viral inhibitor protein. The next stage of work will be to determine whether the regions on the helicase loader that are targeted by the inhibitor and that are important for regulating self-assembly can be selectively disrupted by small molecules to interfere with DNA replication in bacteria.

DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.14158.002

Translation factor IF2 at the interface of transposition and replication by the PriA-PriC pathway

Bacteriophage Mu DNA synthesis is initiated during transposition by replication restart proteins PriA, DnaT and either PriB or PriC. The PriA-PriC pathway requires PriA's helicase activity and other host factors that promote the orderly transition from transpososome to replisome on the Mu DNA template. The host factor MRFalpha-PR, which removes obstacles to PriA binding and promotes the PriA-PriC pathway, was identified to be the translation initiation factor IF2. Purified isoform IF2-2, which is truncated at the N-terminal end, had full MRFalpha-PR activity whereas full-length IF2-1 was inactive. IF2-2 was bound to the Mu DNA template specifically at the step for prereplisome assembly. Prior steps in the orderly transition from transpososome were essential to promote efficient IF2-2 binding. Moreover, PriA helicase activity was subsequently needed to displace IF2-2, remodelling the template to permit replisome assembly. IF2's role in the transition mechanism as well as its function as G protein and translation factor suggest its potential to regulate DNA synthesis by this pathway.

Host factors that promote transpososome disassembly and the PriA-PriC pathway for restart primosome assembly

Initiation of bacteriophage Mu DNA replication by transposition requires the disassembly of the transpososome that catalyses strand exchange and the assembly of a replisome promoted by PriA, PriB, PriC and DnaT proteins, which function in the host to restart stalled replication forks. Once the molecular chaperone ClpX weakens the very tight binding of the transpososome to the Mu ends, host disassembly factors (MRFalpha-DF) promote the dissociation of the transpososome from the DNA template and the assembly of a new nucleoprotein complex. Prereplisome factors (MRFalpha-PR) further alter the complex, allowing PriA binding and loading of major replicative helicase DnaB onto the template promoted by the restart proteins. MRFalpha-PR is essential for DnaB loading by restart proteins even on the deproteinized Mu fork whereas MRFalpha-DF is not required on the deproteinized template. When the transition from transpososome to replisome was reconstituted using MRFalpha-DF and MRFalpha-PR, initiation of Mu DNA replication was strictly dependent upon added PriC and PriA helicase. In contrast, initiation on the deproteinized template was predominantly dependent upon PriB and did not require PriA's helicase activity. The results indicate that transition mechanisms beginning with the transpososome disassembly can determine the pathway of replisome assembly by restart proteins.

Bacteriophage Mu targets the trinucleotide sequence CGG

Target specificity for bacteriophage Mu was studied using a new phage derivative that enabled cloning of Mu-host junctions from phage DNA. Insertions distributed throughout the chromosome showed no orientation bias with respect to transcription or replication polarity. Genes with a high frequency of the triplet CGG were preferred targets.

Requirement of IS911 replication before integration defines a new bacterial transposition pathway

Movement of transposable elements is often accompanied by replication to ensure their proliferation. Replication is associated with both major classes of transposition mechanisms: cut-and-paste and cointegrate formation (paste-and-copy). Cut-and-paste transposition is often activated by replication of the transposon, while in cointegrate formation replication completes integration. We describe a novel transposition mechanism used by insertion sequence IS911, which we call copy-and-paste. IS911 transposes using a circular intermediate (circle), which then integrates into a target. We demonstrate that this is derived from a branched intermediate (figure-eight) in which both ends are joined by a single-strand bridge after a first-strand transfer. In vivo labelling experiments show that the process of circle formation is replicative. The results indicate that the replication pathway not only produces circles from figure-eight but also regenerates the transposon donor plasmid. To confirm the replicative mechanism, we have also used the Escherichia coli terminators (terC) which, when bound by the Tus protein, inhibit replication forks in a polarised manner. Finally, we demonstrate that the primase DnaG is essential, implicating a host-specific replication pathway.

Mu transpososome architecture ensures that unfolding by ClpX or proteolysis by ClpXP remodels but does not destroy the complex

The Clp/Hsp100 ATPases are protein unfoldases that both alter protein conformation and target proteins for degradation. An unresolved question has been how such seemingly destructive enzymes can "remodel" some protein substrates rather than destroy them. Here, we investigate the products of ClpX-mediated remodeling of a hyper-stable protein-DNA complex, the Mu transpososome. We find that although an oligomeric complex is maintained, release of some subunits accompanies ClpX action. Replacement of transposase's endogenous ClpX-recognition sequence with an exogenous signal reveals that the mechanism of remodeling is independent of both the recognition signal and the identity of the unfoldase. Finally, examination of the transposase-DNA contacts reveals only a localized region that is altered during remodeling. These results provide a framework for protein remodeling, wherein the physical attributes of a complex can limit the unfolding activity of its remodeler.

Bio-array images processing and genetic networks modelling

The new tools available for gene expression studies are essentially the bio-array methods using a large variety of physical detectors (isotopes, fluorescent markers, ultrasounds...). Here we present first rapidly an image-processing method independent of the detector type, dealing with the noise and with the peaks overlapping, the peaks revealing the detector activity (isotopic in the presented example), correlated with the gene expression. After this primary step of bio-array image processing, we can extract information about causal influence (activation or inhibition) a gene can exert on other genes, leading to clusters of genes co-expression in which we extract an interaction matrix M and an associated interaction graph G explaining the genetic regulatory dynamics correlated to the studied tissue function. We give two examples of such interaction matrices and graphs (the flowering genetic regulatory network of Arabidopsis thaliana and the lytic/lysogenic operon of the phage Mu) and after some theoretical rigorous results recently obtained concerning the asymptotic states generated by the genetic networks having a given interaction matrix and reciprocally concerning the minimal (in the sense of having a minimal number of non-zero coefficients) matrices having given stationary stable states.

DNA gyrase requirements distinguish the alternate pathways of Mu transposition

The MuA transposase mediates transposition of bacteriophage Mu through two distinct mechanisms. The first integration event following infection occurs through a non-replicative mechanism. In contrast, during lytic growth, multiple rounds of replicative transposition amplify the phage genome. We have examined the influence of gyrase and DNA supercoiling on these two transposition pathways using both a gyrase-inhibiting drug and several distinct gyrase mutants. These experiments reveal that gyrase activity is not essential for integration; both lysogens and recombination intermediates are detected when gyrase is inhibited during Mu infection. In contrast, gyrase inhibition causes severe defects in replicative transposition. In two of the mutants, as well as in drug-treated cells, replicative transposition is almost completely blocked. Experiments probing for formation of MuA-DNA complexes in vivo reveal that this block occurs very early, during assembly of the transposase complex required for the catalytic steps of recombination. The findings establish that DNA structure-based signals are used differently for integrative and replicative transposition. We propose that transposase assembly, the committed step for recombination, has evolved to depend on different DNA /architectural signals to control the reaction outcome during these two distinct phases of the phage life cycle.

Handoff from recombinase to replisome: insights from transposition

Bacteriophage Mu replicates as a transposable element, exploiting host enzymes to promote initiation of DNA synthesis. The phage-encoded transposase MuA, assembled into an oligomeric transpososome, promotes transfer of Mu ends to target DNA, creating a fork at each end, and then remains tightly bound to both forks. In the transition to DNA synthesis, the molecular chaperone ClpX acts first to weaken the transpososome's interaction with DNA, apparently activating its function as a molecular matchmaker. This activated transpososome promotes formation of a new nucleoprotein complex (prereplisome) by yet unidentified host factors [Mu replication factors (MRF alpha 2)], which displace the transpososome in an ATP-dependent reaction. Primosome assembly proteins PriA, PriB, DnaT, and the DnaB--DnaC complex then promote the binding of the replicative helicase DnaB on the lagging strand template of the Mu fork. PriA helicase plays an important role in opening the DNA duplex for DnaB binding, which leads to assembly of DNA polymerase III holoenzyme to form the replisome. The MRF alpha 2 transition factors, assembled into a prereplisome, not only protect the fork from action by nonspecific host enzymes but also appear to aid in replisome assembly by helping to activate PriA's helicase activity. They consist of at least two separable components, one heat stable and the other heat labile. Although the MRF alpha 2 components are apparently not encoded by currently known homologous recombination genes such as recA, recF, recO, and recR, they may fulfill an important function in assembling replisomes on arrested replication forks and products of homologous strand exchange.

PriA and phage T4 gp59: factors that promote DNA replication on forked DNA substrates microreview

The initiation of DNA synthesis on forked DNA templates is a vital process in the replication and maintenance of cellular chromosomes. Two proteins that promote replisome assembly on DNA forks have so far been identified. In phage T4 development the gene 59 protein (gp59) assembles replisomes at D-loops, the sites of homologous strand exchange. Bacterial PriA protein plays an analogous function, most probably restarting replication after replication fork arrest with the aid of homologous recombination proteins, and PriA is also required for phage Mu replication by transposition. Gp59 and PriA exhibit similar DNA fork binding activities, but PriA also has a 3' to 5' helicase activity that can promote duplex opening for replisome assembly. The helicase activity allows PriA's repertoire of templates to be more diverse than that of gp59. It may give PriA the versatility to restart DNA replication without recombination on arrested replication forks that lack appropriate duplex openings.

Versatile action of Escherichia coli ClpXP as protease or molecular chaperone for bacteriophage Mu transposition

The molecular chaperone ClpX of Escherichia coli plays two distinct functions for bacteriophage Mu DNA replication by transposition. As specificity component of a chaperone-linked protease, it recognizes the Mu immunity repressor for degradation by the peptidase component ClpP, thus derepressing Mu transposition functions. After strand exchange has been promoted by MuA transposase, ClpX alone can alter the conformation of the transpososome (the complex of MuA with Mu ends), and the remodeled MuA promotes transition to replisome assembly. Although ClpXP can degrade MuA, the presence of both ClpP and ClpX in the reconstituted transposition system did not destroy MuA essential for initiation of DNA replication by specific host replication enzymes. Levels of ClpXP needed to overcome inhibition by the repressor did not prevent MuA from promoting strand transfer, and ClpP stimulated alteration of the transpososome by ClpX. Apparently intact MuA was still present in the resulting transpososome, promoting initiation of Mu DNA replication by specific replication enzymes. The results indicate that ClpXP can discriminate repressor and MuA in the transpososome as substrates of the protease or the molecular chaperone alone, degrading repressor while remodeling MuA for its next critical function.

ClpX and MuB interact with overlapping regions of Mu transposase: implications for control of the transposition pathway

Transposition of phage Mu is catalyzed by an extremely stable transposase-DNA complex. Once recombination is complete, the Escherichia coli ClpX protein, a member of the Clp/Hsp100 chaperone family, initiates disassembly of the complex for phage DNA replication to commence. To understand how the transition between recombination and replication is controlled, we investigated how transposase-DNA complexes are recognized by ClpX. We find that a 10-amino-acid peptide from the carboxy-terminal domain of transposase is required for its recognition by ClpX. This short, positively charged peptide is also sufficient to convert a heterologous protein into a ClpX substrate. The region of transposase that interacts with the transposition activator, MuB protein, is also defined further and found to overlap with that recognized by ClpX. As a consequence, MuB inhibits disassembly of several transposase-DNA complexes that are intermediates in recombination. This ability of MuB to block access to transposase suggests a mechanism for restricting ClpX-mediated remodeling to the proper stage during replicative transposition. We propose that overlap of sequences involved in subunit interactions and those that target a protein for remodeling or destruction may be a useful design for proteins that function in pathways where remodeling or degradation must be regulated.

3'-end processing and kinetics of 5'-end joining during retroviral integration in vivo

Retroviral replication depends on integration of viral DNA into a host cell chromosome. Integration proceeds in three steps: 3'-end processing, the endonucleolytic removal of the two terminal nucleotides from each 3' end of the viral DNA; strand transfer, the joining of the 3' ends of viral DNA to host DNA; and 5'-end joining (or gap repair), the joining of the 5' ends of viral DNA to host DNA. The 5'-end joining step has never been investigated, either for retroviral integration or for any other transposition process. We have developed an assay for 5'-end joining in vivo and have examined the kinetics of 5'-end joining for Moloney murine leukemia virus (MLV). The interval between 3'-end and 5'-end joining is estimated to be less than 1 h. This assay will be a useful tool for examining whether viral or host components mediate 5'-end joining. MLV integrates its DNA only after its host cell has completed mitosis. We show that the extent of 3'-end processing is the same in unsynchronized and aphidicolin-arrested cells. 3'-end processing therefore does not depend on mitosis.

Ku86-deficient mice exhibit severe combined immunodeficiency and defective processing of V(D)J recombination intermediates

Ku is a heterodimeric DNA end binding complex composed of 70 and 86 kDa subunits. Here, we show that Ku86 is essential for normal V(D)J recombination in vivo, as Ku86-deficient mice are severely defective for formation of coding joints. Unlike severe combined immunodeficient (scid) mice, Ku86-deficient mice are also defective for signal joint formation. Both hairpin coding ends and blunt full-length signal ends accumulate. Contrary to expectation, Ku86 is evidently not required for protection of either type of V(D)J recombination intermediate. Instead, V(D)J recombination appears to be arrested after the cleavage step in Ku86-deficient mice. We suggest that Ku86 may be required to remodel or disassemble DNA-protein complexes containing broken ends, making them available for further processing and joining.

Mu transpositional recombination: donor DNA cleavage and strand transfer in trans by the Mu transposase

Central to the Mu transpositional recombination are the two chemical steps; donor DNA cleavage and strand transfer. These reactions occur within the Mu transpososome that contains two Mu DNA end segments bound to a tetramer of MuA, the transposase. To investigate which MuA monomer catalyzes which chemical reaction, we made transpososomes containing wild-type and active site mutant MuA. By pre-loading the MuA variants onto Mu end DNA fragments of different length prior to transpososome assembly, we could track the catalysis by MuA bound to each Mu end segment. The donor DNA end that underwent the chemical reaction was identified. Both the donor DNA cleavage and strand transfer were catalyzed in trans by the MuA monomers bound to the partner Mu end. This arrangement explains why the transpososome assembly is a prerequisite for the chemical steps.

Characterization of Mu prophage lacking the central strong gyrase binding site: localization of the block in replication

Bacteriophage Mu contains an unusually strong DNA gyrase binding site (SGS), located near the center of its genome, that is required for efficient Mu DNA replication (M. L. Pato, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:7056-7060, 1994; M. L. Pato, M. M. Howe, and N. P. Higgins, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:8716-8720, 1990). Replication of wild-type Mu initiates about 10 min after induction of a lysogen, while replication in the absence of the SGS is delayed about an hour. To determine which step in the replication pathway is blocked in the absence of the SGS, we inactivated the SGS by deletion and by insertion and studied the effects of these alterations on various stages of Mu DNA replication. Following induction in the absence of a functional SGS, early transcription and synthesis of the Mu-encoded replication proteins occurred normally. However, neither strand transfer nor cleavage at the Mu genome termini could be detected 40 min after induction. The data are most consistent with a requirement for the SGS in the efficient synapsis of the Mu prophage termini to form a separate chromosomal domain.

Disassembly of the Mu transposase tetramer by the ClpX chaperone

Mu transposition is promoted by an extremely stable complex containing a tetramer of the transposase (MuA) bound to the recombining DNA. Here we purify the Escherichia coli ClpX protein, a member of a family of multimeric ATPases present in prokaryotes and eukaryotes (the Clp family), on the basis of its ability to remove the transposase from the DNA after recombination. Previously, ClpX has been shown to function with the ClpP peptidase in protein turnover. However, neither ClpP nor any other protease is required for disassembly of the transposase. The released MuA is not modified extensively, degraded, or irreversibly denatured, and is able to perform another round of recombination in vitro. We conclude that ClpX catalyzes the ATP-dependent release of MuA by promoting a transient conformational change in the protein and, therefore, can be considered a molecular chaperone. ClpX is important at the transition between the recombination and DNA replication steps of transposition in vitro; this function probably corresponds to the essential contribution of ClpX for Mu growth. Deletion analysis reveals that the sequence at the carboxyl terminus of MuA is important for disassembly by ClpX and can target MuA for degradation by ClpXP in vitro. These data contribute to the emerging picture that members of the Clp family are chaperones specifically suited for disaggregating proteins and are able to function with or without a collaborating protease.

Disassembly of the bacteriophage Mu transposase for the initiation of Mu DNA replication

Upon catalyzing strand transfer, the Mu transposase (MuA) remains tightly bound to the resulting transposition intermediate, the strand transfer complex (STC), and poses an impediment to host replication proteins. Additional host factors, which can be resolved into two fractions (Mu Replication Factor alpha and beta; MRF alpha and MRF beta), are required to disassemble the MuA complex and initiate DNA synthesis. MRF alpha modifies the protein content of the STC, removing MuA from the DNA in the process. The MRF beta promotes initiation of the Mu DNA synthesis on the STC altered by the MRF alpha. These host factors cannot promote initiation of Mu DNA synthesis if the STC is damaged by partial proteolysis. Moreover, the mutant protein MuA211 cannot be removed from the STC by MRF alpha, blocking initiation of DNA synthesis. These results indicate that MuA in the STC plays a critical function in beginning a sequence of events leading to the establishment of a Mu replication fork.

Structure of the bacteriophage Mu transposase core: a common structural motif for DNA transposition and retroviral integration

The crystal structure of the core domain of bacteriophage Mu transposase, MuA, has been determined at 2.4 A resolution. The first of two subdomains contains the active site and, despite very limited sequence homology, exhibits a striking similarity to the core domain of HIV-1 integrase, which carries out a similar set of biochemical reactions. It also exhibits more limited similarity to other nucleases, RNase H and RuvC. The second, a beta barrel, connects to the first subdomain through several contacts. Three independent determinations of the monomer structure from two crystal forms all show the active site held in a similar, apparently inactive configuration. The enzymatic activity of MuA is known to be activated by formation of a DNA-bound tetramer of the protein. We propose that the connections between the two subdomains may be involved in the cross-talk between the active site and the other domains of the transposase that controls the activity of the protein.