Inhibition of dihydropteridine reductase from human liver and rat striatal synaptosomes by apomorphine and its analogs

Apomorphine has a potent antiproliferative effect on Chinese hamster ovary cells

Apomorphine is a potent non selective agonist at the D1 and D2 dopamine receptors acting both pre- and post-synaptically. In this report we describe a novel function of apomorphine, independent from its dopaminergic activity. Apomorphine inhibits Chinese hamster ovary (CHO)-K1 cell proliferation in a dose-dependent manner. The EC50 of apomorphine-induced inhibition of CHO-K1 cell proliferation determined by cell counting was 3.24 +/- 0.07 microM. Remarkably, the dose-response curve obtained by measuring the incorporation of [3H]thymidine was practically identical to the previous one giving an EC50 of 3.52 +/- 0.04 microM. The dopaminergic antagonists SCH23390 and spiperone at a concentration of 10 microM (well beyond their Kd values for the dopamine D1- and D2-like receptors respectively) were not able to antagonize the effect of apomorphine on CHO-K1 cell proliferation. Apomorphine exerts its effect early during incubation; CHO-K1 cells exposed to apomorphine for a period as short as 1 h and then allowed to grow for three days were significantly reduced in number with respect to untreated control cells. After four hours of exposition to apomorphine (10 microM) the antiproliferative effect was similar to that seen when this compound was present in the bath for all three days. Concentrations of apomorphine higher than 10 microM induced cell death, and the colony was completely destroyed at 50 microM. Cytometric analyses showed a significant accumulation of CHO-K1 cells in the G2/M phase.

Behavioral sensitization following subchronic apomorphine treatment--possible neurochemical basis

Subchronic treatment with the dopamine agonist apomorphine produces a sensitization to the stereotypic effects of subsequent apomorphine challenge. The present study investigated the effects of this subchronic treatment on apomorphine induced stereotypic behavior and striatal dopamine synthesis, release, metabolism, and D2 receptor binding. The pretreatment, which enhanced the behavioral response to apomorphine challenge, also elevated basal dopamine synthesis and metabolism, but left the ability of a challenge dose of apomorphine to inhibit dopamine synthesis and metabolism unaltered. Thus, ongoing dopamine synthesis and extracellular levels of metabolites would be higher following apomorphine challenge in animals treated subchronically with the agonist. In contrast, neither synaptosomal dopamine release in response to depolarizing stimuli nor the density of D2 dopamine receptors was altered by the treatment. Overall, the results suggest that, while we did not find evidence of autoreceptor desensitization per se, apomorphine treatment may result in enhanced extracellular dopamine levels following dopamine agonist challenge to provide a greater stimulation of an intact dopamine receptor system.

Rat striatal synaptosomes as a model system for studying the inhibition of dihydropteridine reductase activity

The distribution of dihydropteridine reductase between soluble and particulate fractions in synaptosomes parallels that of lactate dehydrogenase, but not monoamine oxidase. Ki and I50 values for inhibitors obtained with the enzyme-rich P2 fraction and its twice-washed fraction (P2W2) were essentially the same, and were similar to those obtained with highly purified human liver enzyme. Dihydropteridine reductase inhibitory potency of multi-ring compounds containing a catechol-moiety was greater than that of single ring catecholic compounds, which in turn was greater than that of p-hydroxy-phenolic compounds. The P2 fraction of rat striatal synaptosomal preparations may serve as a convenient source of dihydropteridine reductase for studying the inhibition of this enzyme.

Apomorphine does not decrease tissue levels of tetrahydrobiopterin in vivo

It was reported that R(-)apomorphine and other catechols are potent inhibitors of dihydropteridine reductase in vitro. It was suggested that decreased levels of tetrahydrobiopterin may represent a mechanism by which R(-)apomorphine inhibits catecholamine synthesis in vivo. This paper demonstrates that tetrahydrobiopterin levels are not affected either in vitro (PC12 cells) or in vivo (rat liver and corpus striatum) by treatment with R(-)apomorphine, whereas DOPA (3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine) production (PC12 cells, corpus striatum) is reduced. This indicates that R(-)apomorphine does not inhibit DOPA production by reducing 6(R)-L-erythro-tetrahydrobiopterin) levels.

Direct inhibition of tyrosine hydroxylase from PC-12 cells by catechol derivatives

Several drugs with a catechol moiety were studied for their potency to inhibit tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) from PC-12 cells in vitro. When the natural compounds tested were compared, dopamine, norepinephrine and 2(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-ethanol (DOPET) were most effective (IC50 between 1.4 and 3.6 microM with 0.5 microM 6(R,S)-L-erythro-5,6,7,8-tetrahydrobiopterin as cofactor). 3,4-Dihydroxyphenylalanine (DOPA; IC50: 35 microM) and 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC; IC50: 180 microM were less potent inhibitors. Among the synthetic drugs possessing catechol moiety, isoproterenol, (+/-)-2-amino-6,7-dihydroxy-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene (6,7-ADTN) and (+/-)-2-dimethylamino-6,7-dihydroxy-tetrahydronaphthalene (TL-99) had the same inhibitory effects as the natural catecholamines (IC50 between 1.6 and 3.9 microM), whereas the apomorphine derivatives and 2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1-phenyl-1 H-3-benzazepine-7,8-diol (SKF 38393) were even more potent (IC50: 0.5-0.8 microM). These results demonstrate that natural catechols and certain drugs (e.g. 6,7-ADTN, TL-99, SKF 38393) are more effective direct blockers of tyrosine hydroxylase than generally assumed provided appropriate assay conditions are used. In the case of dopamine and norepinephrine, these findings suggest a reevaluation of their role for feedback control of tyrosine hydroxylase in vivo.

Striatal synaptosomal dopamine synthesis: evidence against direct regulation by an autoreceptor mechanism

Regulation of the rate-limiting step in dopamine (DA) synthesis was estimated in striatal synaptosomes by measuring the rate of hydroxylation of L-4-[3H]phenylalanine, a substrate of tyrosine hydroxylase (TH). DA inhibited hydroxylation with an IC50 of 0.2 microM. The concentration-response curve of DA-induced inhibition was not affected by the presence of 1 microM chlorpromazine, a phenothiazine DA antagonist. Sulpiride and haloperidol, DA antagonists of the benzamide and butyrophenone classes respectively, also failed to alter the inhibition of substrate hydroxylation by 1 microM DA, even at concentrations up to 10 microM. In contrast, a parallel 15 fold shift to the right in the concentration-response curve of DA-induced inhibition of hydroxylation was obtained when 10 microM nomifensine, a competitive DA uptake inhibitor, was added. Even in the presence of nomifensine, 1 microM chlorpromazine had no effect on the DA concentration-response curve. The addition of DMPH4, an artificial cofactor for TH, completely blocked DA-induced inhibition of enzymatic activity. These data suggest that direct autoreceptor control of synaptosomal TH activity does not exist in vitro, and that DA-induced inhibition of TH occurs subsequent to reuptake via classical feedback inhibition, presumably by competitive displacement of the necessary endogenous cofactor.

Inhibition of dihydropteridine reductase in rat striatal synaptosomes and from human liver by metabolites of biogenic amines

Catecholamines are potent noncompetitive inhibitors of dihydropteridine reductase in rat striatal synaptosomal preparations or purified from human liver. Their metabolites, except homovanillic acid, also inhibit the enzyme from both sources. The inhibitory potency of these compounds depends on the presence of the catechol or the 4-hydroxyphenyl structure, but may be modified by the 2-carbon side chain and its substituents. Indoleamines which have a hydroxylated aromatic nucleus (5-hydroxytryptamine and 5,6-dihydroxytryptamine) are equally inhibitory to the enzyme. These results suggest that biogenic amines themselves rather than their metabolites may serve as physiological inhibitors of dihydropteridine reductase in rat brain.