Transposase contacts with mu DNA ends

The casposon-encoded Cas1 protein from Aciduliprofundum boonei is a DNA integrase that generates target site duplications

Many archaea and bacteria have an adaptive immune system known as CRISPR which allows them to recognize and destroy foreign nucleic acid that they have previously encountered. Two CRISPR-associated proteins, Cas1 and Cas2, are required for the acquisition step of adaptation, in which fragments of foreign DNA are incorporated into the host CRISPR locus. Cas1 genes have also been found scattered in several archaeal and bacterial genomes, unassociated with CRISPR loci or other cas proteins. Rather, they are flanked by nearly identical inverted repeats and enclosed within direct repeats, suggesting that these genetic regions might be mobile elements (‘casposons’). To investigate this possibility, we have characterized the in vitro activities of the putative Cas1 transposase (‘casposase’) from Aciduliprofundum boonei. The purified Cas1 casposase can integrate both short oligonucleotides with inverted repeat sequences and a 2.8 kb excised mini-casposon into target DNA. Casposon integration occurs without target specificity and generates 14–15 basepair target site duplications, consistent with those found in casposon host genomes. Thus, Cas1 casposases carry out similar biochemical reactions as the CRISPR Cas1-Cas2 complex but with opposite substrate specificities: casposases integrate specific sequences into random target sites, whereas CRISPR Cas1-Cas2 integrates essentially random sequences into a specific site in the CRISPR locus.

The μ transpososome structure sheds light on DDE recombinase evolution

Studies of bacteriophage Mu transposition paved the way for understanding retroviral integration and V(D)J recombination as well as many other DNA transposition reactions. Here we report the structure of the Mu transpososome--Mu transposase (MuA) in complex with bacteriophage DNA ends and target DNA--determined from data that extend anisotropically to 5.2 Å, 5.2 Å and 3.7 Å resolution, in conjunction with previously determined structures of individual domains. The highly intertwined structure illustrates why chemical activity depends on formation of the synaptic complex, and reveals that individual domains have different roles when bound to different sites. The structure also provides explanations for the increased stability of the final product complex and for its preferential recognition by the ATP-dependent unfoldase ClpX. Although MuA and many other recombinases share a structurally conserved 'DDE' catalytic domain, comparisons among the limited set of available complex structures indicate that some conserved features, such as catalysis in trans and target DNA bending, arose through convergent evolution because they are important for function.

The mu transpososome through a topological lens

Phage Mu is the most efficient transposable element known, its high efficiency being conferred by an enhancer DNA element. Transposition is the end result of a series of well choreographed steps that juxtapose the enhancer and the two Mu ends within a nucleoprotein complex called the 'transpososome.' The particular arrangement of DNA and protein components lends extraordinary stability to the transpososome and regulates the frequency, precision, directionality, and mechanism of transposition. The structure of the transpososome, therefore, holds the key to understanding all of these attributes, and ultimately to explaining the runaway genetic success of transposable elements throughout the biological world. This review focuses on the path of the DNA within the Mu transpososome, as uncovered by recent topological analyses. It discusses why Mu topology cannot be analyzed by standard methods, and how knowledge of the geometry of site alignment during Flp and Cre site-specific recombination was harnessed to design a new methodology called 'difference topology.' This methodology has also revealed the order and dynamics of association of the three interacting DNA sites, as well as the role of the enhancer in assembly of the Mu transpososome.

3D reconstruction of the Mu transposase and the Type 1 transpososome: a structural framework for Mu DNA transposition

Mu DNA transposition proceeds through a series of higher-order nucleoprotein complexes called transpososomes. The structural core of the transpososome is a tetramer of the transposase, Mu A, bound to the two transposon ends. High-resolution structural analysis of the intact transposase and the transpososome has not been successful to date. Here we report the structure of Mu A at 16-angstroms and the Type 1 transpososome at 34-angstroms resolution, by 3D reconstruction of images obtained by scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) at cryo-temperatures. Electron spectroscopic imaging (ESI) of the DNA-phosphorus was performed in conjunction with the structural investigation to derive the path of the DNA through the transpososome and to define the DNA-binding surface in the transposase. Our model of the transpososome fits well with the accumulated biochemical literature for this intricate transposition system, and lays a structural foundation for biochemical function, including catalysis in trans and the complex circuit of macromolecular interactions underlying Mu DNA transposition.

Functional comparison of the transposition core machineries of phage Mu and Haemophilus influenzae Mu-like prophage Hin-Mu reveals interchangeable components

Bacteriophage Mu uses DNA transposition for propagation and is a model for transposition studies in general. Recent identification of Mu-like prophages within bacterial genomes offers new material for evolutionary and comparative functional studies. One such prophage, Hin-Mu of Haemophilus influenzae Rd, was studied for its transpositional properties. The components of its transposition core machinery, the encoded transposase (MuA(Hin)) and the transposase binding sites, were evaluated for functional properties by sequence comparisons and DNase I footprinting. Transpositional activity of Hin-Mu was examined by in vitro assays directly assessing the assembly and catalytic function of the transposition core machinery. The Hin-Mu components readily assembled catalytically competent protein-DNA complexes, transpososomes. Thus, Hin-Mu encodes a functional transposase and contains critical transposase binding sites. Despite marked sequence differences, components of the Hin-Mu and Mu transposition core machineries are partially interchangeable, reflecting both conservation and flexibility in the functionally important regions within the transpososome structure.

Early intermediates of mariner transposition: catalysis without synapsis of the transposon ends suggests a novel architecture of the synaptic complex

The mariner family is probably the most widely distributed family of transposons in nature. Although these transposons are related to the well-studied bacterial insertion elements, there is evidence for major differences in their reaction mechanisms. We report the identification and characterization of complexes that contain the Himar1 transposase bound to a single transposon end. Titrations and mixing experiments with the native transposase and transposase fusions suggested that they contain different numbers of transposase monomers. However, the DNA protection footprints of the two most abundant single-end complexes are identical. This indicates that some transposase monomers may be bound to the transposon end solely by protein-protein interactions. This would mean that the Himar1 transposase can dimerize independently of the second transposon end and that the architecture of the synaptic complex has more in common with V(D)J recombination than with bacterial insertion elements. Like V(D)J recombination and in contrast to the case for bacterial elements, Himar1 catalysis does not appear to depend on synapsis of the transposon ends, and the single-end complexes are active for nicking and probably for cleavage. We discuss the role of this single-end activity in generating the mutations that inactivate the vast majority of mariner elements in eukaryotes.

Reorganization of the Mu transpososome active sites during a cooperative transition between DNA cleavage and joining

Transposition of mobile genetic elements proceeds through a series of DNA phosphoryl transfer reactions, with multiple reaction steps catalyzed by the same set of active site residues. Mu transposase repeatedly utilizes the same active site DDE residues to cleave and join a single DNA strand at each transposon end to a new, distant DNA location (the target DNA). To better understand how DNA is manipulated within the Mu transposase-DNA complex during recombination, the impact of the DNA immediately adjacent to the Mu DNA ends (the flanking DNA) on the progress of transposition was investigated. We show that, in the absence of the MuB activator, the 3 '-flanking strand can slow one or more steps between DNA cleavage and joining. The presence of this flanking DNA strand in just one active site slows the joining step in both active sites. Further evidence suggests that this slow step is not due to a change in the affinity of the transpososome for the target DNA. Finally, we demonstrate that MuB activates transposition by stimulating the reaction step between cleavage and joining that is otherwise slowed by this flanking DNA strand. Based on these results, we propose that the 3 '-flanking DNA strand must be removed from, or shifted within, both active sites after the cleavage step; this movement is coupled to a conformational change within the transpososome that properly positions the target DNA simultaneously within both active sites and thereby permits joining.

Sequence and positional requirements for DNA sites in a mu transpososome

Transposition of bacteriophage Mu uses two DNA cleavage sites and six transposase recognition sites, with each recognition site divided into two half-sites. The recognition sites can activate transposition of non-Mu DNA sequences if a complete set of Mu sequences is not available. We have analyzed 18 sequences from a non-Mu DNA molecule, selected in a functional assay for the ability to be transposed by MuA transposase. These sequences are remarkably diverse. Nonetheless, when viewed as a group they resemble a Mu DNA end, with a cleavage site and a single recognition site. Analysis of these "pseudo-Mu ends" indicates that most positions in the cleavage and recognition sites contribute sequence-specific information that helps drive transposition, though only the strongest contributors are apparent from mutagenesis data. The sequence analysis also suggests variability in the alignment of recognition half-sites. Transposition assays of specifically designed DNA substrates support the conclusion that the transposition machinery is flexible enough to permit variability in half-site spacing and also perhaps variability in the placement of the recognition site with respect to the cleavage site. This variability causes only local perturbations in the protein-DNA complex, as indicated by experiments in which altered and unaltered DNA substrates are paired.

DNA recognition sites activate MuA transposase to perform transposition of non-Mu DNA

Mu transposition occurs within a large protein-DNA complex called a transpososome. This stable complex includes four subunits of MuA transposase, each contacting a 22-base pair recognition site located near an end of the transposon DNA. These MuA recognition sites are critical for assembling the transpososome. Here we report that when concentrations of Mu DNA are limited, the MuA recognition sites permit assembly of transpososomes in which non-Mu DNA substitutes for some of the Mu sequences. These "hybrid" transpososomes are stable to competitor DNA, actively transpose the non-Mu DNA, and produce transposition products that had been previously observed but not explained. The strongest activator of non-Mu transposition is a DNA fragment containing two MuA recognition sites and no cleavage site, but a shorter fragment with just one recognition site is sufficient. Based on our results, we propose that MuA recognition sites drive assembly of functional transpososomes in two complementary ways. Multiple recognition sites help physically position MuA subunits in the transpososome plus each individual site allosterically activates transposase.

Effect of mutations in the Mu-host junction region on transpososome assembly

Mu transposition occurs through a series of higher-order nucleoprotein complexes called transpososomes. The region where the Mu DNA joins the host DNA plays an integral role in the assembly of these transpososomes. We have created a series of point mutations at the Mu-host junction and characterized their effect on the Mu in vitro strand transfer reaction. Analysis of these mutant constructs revealed an inhibition in transpososome assembly at the point in the reaction pathway when the junction region is engaged by the transposase active site (i.e. the transition from LER to type 0). We found that the degree of inhibition was dependent upon the particular base-pair change at each position and whether the substitution occurred at the left or right transposon end. The MuB transposition protein, an allosteric effector of MuA, was shown to suppress all of the inhibitory Mu-host junction mutants. Most of the mutant constructs were also suppressed, to varying degrees, by the substitution of Mg(2+) with Mn(2+). Analysis of the mutant constructs has revealed hierarchical nucleotide preferences at positions -1 through +3 for transpososome assembly and suggests the possibility that specific metal ion-DNA base interactions are involved in DNA recognition and transpososome assembly.

IS903 transposase mutants that suppress defective inverted repeats

The inverted repeats (IRs) of the insertion element IS903 are composed of two functional regions. An inner region, consisting of basepairs 6-18, is the transposase binding site. The outer region (positions 1-3) is not contacted during initial transposase binding, but is essential for efficient transposition. We have examined the interaction of the IR with the transposase by isolating transposase suppressors of IR mutations. These suppressors define two patches within the N-terminus of the protein. One class of suppressors, which rescued the majority of outer IR mutants tested, contained mutations in close proximity to an aspartate residue (D121) believed to form part of the catalytic DDE motif, suggesting that their suppressive effect is in the positioning of the catalytic site at the terminus of the transposon. The hypertransposition phenotype of mutant VA119 is also consistent with this hypothesis. The second class was more allele specific and preferentially suppressed a mutation at position 3 of the IR. Finally, we showed that mutations at the termini of the IR elevate the frequency of cointegrate formation by IS903. Other outer IR mutations did not have this effect. These data are consistent with the terminal bases of the transposon playing multiple and distinct roles in transposition.

Positional information within the Mu transposase tetramer: catalytic contributions of individual monomers

The strand cleavage and strand transfer reactions of Mu DNA transposition require structural/catalytic contributions from separate polypeptide domains of individual transposase (MuA) monomers within the functional MuA tetramer. Based on catalytic complementation between two inactive MuA variants, we have derived certain rules by which the physical location of a MuA monomer within the transposition complex specifies its role in DNA breakage and transfer. During strand transfer, MuA monomers contributing domain II to the reaction occupy R1 (the subsite proximal to the strand-transferred nucleotide), while those contributing domain IIIalpha occupy R2. The positions of the monomers contributing these two domains appear to be reversed during DNA cleavage.

Three-site synapsis during Mu DNA transposition: a critical intermediate preceding engagement of the active site

The chemical steps of bacteriophage Mu DNA transposition take place within a higher order nucleoprotein structure. We describe a novel intermediate that precedes the previously characterized transpososomes and directly demonstrates the interaction of a distant enhancer element with recombination regions. The transpositional enhancer interacts with the Mu left and right ends to form a three-site synaptic (LER) complex. Under normal reaction conditions, the LER complex is rapidly converted into the more stable Mu transpososomes. However, mutation of the Mu terminal nucleotides results in accumulation of the LER and a failure to form the type 0 transpososome. During the transition from LER to type 0, the Mu DNA termini and the active site of the transposase engage in a catalytically competent conformation.

The interwoven architecture of the Mu transposase couples DNA synapsis to catalysis

Mu transposition occurs exclusively using a pair of recombination sites found at the ends of the phage genome. To address the mechanistic basis of this specificity, we have determined both where the individual subunits of the tetrameric transposase bind on the DNA and where they catalyze DNA joining. We demonstrate that subunits do not catalyze recombination at the site adjacent to where they are bound, but rather on the opposite end of the phage genome. Furthermore, subunits bound to two different sites contribute to catalysis of one reaction step. This interwoven subunit arrangement suggests a molecular explanation for the precision with which recombination occurs using a pair of DNA signals and provides an example of the way in which the architecture of a protein-DNA complex can define the reaction products.

Kinetic and structural probing of the precleavage synaptic complex (type 0) formed during phage Mu transposition. Action of metal ions and reagents specific to single-stranded DNA

In an earlier kinetic study (Wang, Z., and Harshey, R. M. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 91, 699-703), we showed that supercoiling free energy was utilized during Mu transposition to lower the activation barrier of some rate-limiting step in the formation of the cleaved Mu end synaptic complex (type I complex). We report here results from kinetic studies on the assembled but uncleaved synaptic complex (type 0). Based on the estimated rate constants for the formation of type 0 and type I complexes, as well as their temperature and superhelicity dependence, we infer that the type 0 complex is an authentic intermediate in the pathway to Mu end cleavage. Our results are consistent with type 0 production being the rate-limiting step in the overall type I reaction. The conversion of type 0 to type I complex is a fast reaction, does not show strong temperature dependence, and is apparently independent of substrate superhelicity. We have explored the DNA structure within the type 0 complex using chemical and enzymatic probes. The observed susceptibility of DNA outside the Mu ends to single-strand-specific reagents suggests that a helix opening event is associated with type 0 formation. This structural perturbation could account, at least partly, for the high activation barrier to the reaction. There is a close correlation between the appearance of single strandedness near the Mu ends and the superhelicity of the DNA substrate. It is possible that supercoiling energy is utilized in effecting specific conformational transitions within DNA. We have found that Zn2+ and Co2+ ions, like Mg2+ and Mn2+ ions, can efficiently cleave the type 0 complex. However, unlike Mg2+ and Mn2+ ions, Zn2+ and Co2+ ions cannot support assembly of type 0. We discuss the implications of our findings for the mechanism of Mu transposition.

Mu transpositional recombination: donor DNA cleavage and strand transfer in trans by the Mu transposase

Central to the Mu transpositional recombination are the two chemical steps; donor DNA cleavage and strand transfer. These reactions occur within the Mu transpososome that contains two Mu DNA end segments bound to a tetramer of MuA, the transposase. To investigate which MuA monomer catalyzes which chemical reaction, we made transpososomes containing wild-type and active site mutant MuA. By pre-loading the MuA variants onto Mu end DNA fragments of different length prior to transpososome assembly, we could track the catalysis by MuA bound to each Mu end segment. The donor DNA end that underwent the chemical reaction was identified. Both the donor DNA cleavage and strand transfer were catalyzed in trans by the MuA monomers bound to the partner Mu end. This arrangement explains why the transpososome assembly is a prerequisite for the chemical steps.

The organization of the outside end of transposon Tn5

The end sequences of the IS50 insertion sequence are known as the outside end (OE) and inside end. These complex ends are related but nonidentical 19-bp sequences that serve as substrates for the activity of the Tn5 transposase. Besides providing the binding site of the transposase, the end sequences of a transposon contain additional types of information necessary for transposition. These additional properties include but are not limited to host protein interaction sites and sites that program synapsis and cleavage events. In order to delineate the properties of the IS50 ends,the base pairs involved in the transposase binding site have been defined. This has been approached through performing a variety of in vitro analyses: a ++hydroxyl radical missing-nucleoside interference experiment, a dimethyl sulfate interference experiment, and an examination of the relative binding affinities of single-site end substitutions. These approaches have led to the conclusion that the transposase binds to two nonsymmetrical regions of the OE, including positions 6 to 9 and 13 to 19. Proper binding occurs along one face of the helix, over two major and minor grooves, and appears to result in a significant bending of the DNA centered approximately 3 bp from the donor DNA-OE junction.

Assembly of phage Mu transpososomes: cooperative transitions assisted by protein and DNA scaffolds

Transposition of phage Mu takes place within higher order protein-DNA complexes called transpososomes. These complexes contain the two Mu genome ends synapsed by a tetramer of Mu transposase (MuA). Transpososome assembly is tightly controlled by multiple protein and DNA sequence cofactors. We find that assembly can occur through two distinct pathways. One previously described pathway depends on an enhancer-like sequence element, the internal activation sequence (IAS). The second pathway depends on a MuB protein-target DNA complex. For both pathways, all four MuA monomers in the tetramer need to interact with an assembly-assisting element, either the IAS or MuB. However, once assembled, not all MuA monomers within the transpososome need to interact with MuB to capture MuB-bound target DNA. The multiple layers of control likely are used in vivo to ensure efficient rounds of DNA replication when needed, while minimizing unwanted transposition products.

Structure of the bacteriophage Mu transposase core: a common structural motif for DNA transposition and retroviral integration

The crystal structure of the core domain of bacteriophage Mu transposase, MuA, has been determined at 2.4 A resolution. The first of two subdomains contains the active site and, despite very limited sequence homology, exhibits a striking similarity to the core domain of HIV-1 integrase, which carries out a similar set of biochemical reactions. It also exhibits more limited similarity to other nucleases, RNase H and RuvC. The second, a beta barrel, connects to the first subdomain through several contacts. Three independent determinations of the monomer structure from two crystal forms all show the active site held in a similar, apparently inactive configuration. The enzymatic activity of MuA is known to be activated by formation of a DNA-bound tetramer of the protein. We propose that the connections between the two subdomains may be involved in the cross-talk between the active site and the other domains of the transposase that controls the activity of the protein.

(+)-CC-1065 as a probe for intrinsic and protein-induced bending of DNA

(+)-CC-1065 is a biologically potent DNA-reactive antitumor antibiotic produced by Streptomyces zelensis. This antibiotic covalently modifies DNA by alkylation of N-3 of adenine in the minor groove. As a structural consequence of covalent modification of DNA, the helix axis is bent into the minor groove. The drug-induced bending of DNA has similarities to intrinsic A-tract bending and the 3' adenine of A-tracts shows a unique reactivity to alkylation by (+)-CC-1065. Upon covalent modification of A-tracts, the magnitude of bending is increased and the helix is stiffened. Using high-field NMR, hydroxyl-radical footprinting and gel electrophoresis, the molecular basis for the high reactivity of the bonding sequence 5'-AGTTA* (an asterisk indicates the covalent modification site) to (+)-CC-1065 has been shown to involve the inherent conformational flexibility of this sequence. Furthermore, these studies also demonstrate that after alkylation the drug-induced bending is focused over the TT region. By analogy with the junction bend model for A-tracts, a 'truncated junction bend model' is proposed for this structure. Last, the application (+)-CC-1065 entrapped/induced bending of DNA as a probe for the Sp1-induced bending of the 21-base-pair repeat and Mu transposase bending of the att L3 sequence is described.

Characterization of functionally important sites in the bacteriophage Mu transposase protein

The 663 amino acid Mu transposase protein is absolutely required for Mu DNA transposition. Mutant proteins were constructed in vitro in order to locate regions of transposase that may be important for the catalysis of DNA transposition. Deletions in the A gene, which encodes the transposase, yielded two stable mutant proteins that aid in defining the end-specific DNA-binding domain. Linker insertion mutagenesis at eight sites in the Mu A gene generated two proteins, FF6 and FF14 (resulting from two and four amino acid insertions, respectively, at position 408), which were thermolabile for DNA binding in vitro at 43 degrees C. However, transposition activity in vivo was severely reduced for all mutant proteins at 37 degrees C, except those with insertions at positions 328 and 624. In addition, site-specific mutagenesis was performed to alter tyrosine 414, which is situated in a region that displays amino acid homology to the active sites of a number of nicking/closing enzymes. Tyrosine 414 may reside within an important, yet non-essential, site of transposase, as an aspartate-substituted protein had a drastically reduced frequency of transposition, while the remaining mutants yielded reduced, but substantial, frequencies of microMu transposition in vivo.

Division of labor among monomers within the Mu transposase tetramer

A single tetramer of Mu transposase (MuA) pairs the recombination sites, cleaves the donor DNA, and joins these ends to a target DNA by strand transfer. Analysis of C-terminal deletion derivatives of MuA reveals that a 30 amino acid region between residues 575 and 605 is critical for these three steps. Although inactive on its own, a deletion protein lacking this region assembles with the wild-type protein. These mixed tetramers carry out donor cleavage but do not promote strand transfer, even when the donor cleavage stage is bypassed. These data suggest that the active center of the transposase is composed of the C-terminus of four MuA monomers; one dimer carries out donor cleavage while all four monomers contribute to strand transfer.

Mechanistic aspects of DNA transposition

The past year has seen a number of important advances in our understanding of the mechanisms of DNA transposition. The molecular details of the protein-protein, protein-DNA and chemical-reaction steps in several transposition systems have been revealed and have highlighted remarkable uniformity in some areas, ranging from bacterial to retroviral mechanisms.