The Bacteriophage T4 DNA Replication Fork

Mechanisms of mutagenesis induced by DNA lesions: multiple factors affect mutations in translesion DNA synthesis

Environmental mutagens lead to mutagenesis. However, the mechanisms are very complicated and not fully understood. Environmental mutagens produce various DNA lesions, including base-damaged or sugar-modified DNA lesions, as well as epigenetically modified DNA. DNA polymerases produce mutation spectra in translesion DNA synthesis (TLS) through misincorporation of incorrect nucleotides, frameshift deletions, blockage of DNA replication, imbalance of leading- and lagging-strand DNA synthesis, and genome instability. Motif or subunit in DNA polymerases further affects the mutations in TLS. Moreover, protein interactions and accessory proteins in DNA replisome also alter mutations in TLS, demonstrated by several representative DNA replisomes. Finally, in cells, multiple DNA polymerases or cellular proteins collaborate in TLS and reduce in vivo mutagenesis. Summaries and perspectives were listed. This review shows mechanisms of mutagenesis induced by DNA lesions and the effects of multiple factors on mutations in TLS in vitro and in vivo.

Protein interactions in T7 DNA replisome inhibit the bypass of abasic site by DNA polymerase

Abasic site as a common DNA lesion blocks DNA replication and is highly mutagenic. Protein interactions in T7 DNA replisome facilitate DNA replication and translesion DNA synthesis. However, bypass of an abasic site by T7 DNA replisome has never been investigated. In this work, we used T7 DNA replisome and T7 DNA polymerase alone as two models to study DNA replication on encountering an abasic site. Relative to unmodified DNA, abasic site strongly inhibited primer extension and completely blocked strand-displacement DNA synthesis, due to the decreased fraction of enzyme-DNA productive complex and the reduced average extension rates. Moreover, abasic site at DNA fork inhibited the binding of DNA polymerase or helicase onto fork and the binding between polymerase and helicase at fork. Notably and unexpectedly, we found DNA polymerase alone bypassed an abasic site on primer/template (P/T) substrate more efficiently than did polymerase and helicase complex bypass it at fork. The presence of gp2.5 further inhibited the abasic site bypass at DNA fork. Kinetic analysis showed that this inhibition at fork relative to that on P/T was due to the decreased fraction of productive complex instead of the average extension rates. Therefore, we found that protein interactions in T7 DNA replisome inhibited the bypass of DNA lesion, different from all the traditional concept that protein interactions or accessory proteins always promote DNA replication and DNA damage bypass, providing new insights in translesion DNA synthesis performed by DNA replisome.

Near-continuously synthesized leading strands in Escherichia coli are broken by ribonucleotide excision

In vitro, purified replisomes drive model replication forks to synthesize continuous leading strands, even without ligase, supporting the semidiscontinuous model of DNA replication. However, nascent replication intermediates isolated from ligase-deficient Escherichia coli comprise only short (on average 1.2-kb) Okazaki fragments. It was long suspected that cells replicate their chromosomal DNA by the semidiscontinuous mode observed in vitro but that, in vivo, the nascent leading strand was artifactually fragmented postsynthesis by excision repair. Here, using high-resolution separation of pulse-labeled replication intermediates coupled with strand-specific hybridization, we show that excision-proficient E. coli generates leading-strand intermediates >10-fold longer than lagging-strand Okazaki fragments. Inactivation of DNA-repair activities, including ribonucleotide excision, further increased nascent leading-strand size to ∼80 kb, while lagging-strand Okazaki fragments remained unaffected. We conclude that in vivo, repriming occurs ∼70× less frequently on the leading versus lagging strands, and that DNA replication in E. coli is effectively semidiscontinuous.

Protein Interactions in the T7 DNA Replisome Facilitate DNA Damage Bypass

The DNA replisome inevitably encounters DNA damage during DNA replication. The T7 DNA replisome contains a DNA polymerase (gp5), the processivity factor thioredoxin (trx), a helicase-primase (gp4), and a ssDNA-binding protein (gp2.5). T7 protein interactions mediate this DNA replication. However, whether the protein interactions could promote DNA damage bypass is still little addressed. In this study, we investigated strand-displacement DNA synthesis past 8-oxoG or O6 -MeG lesions at the synthetic DNA fork by the T7 DNA replisome. DNA damage does not obviously affect the binding affinities between helicase, polymerase, and DNA fork. Relative to unmodified G, both 8-oxoG and O6 -MeG-as well as GC-rich template sequence clusters-inhibit strand-displacement DNA synthesis and produce partial extension products. Relative to the gp4 ΔC-tail, gp4 promotes DNA damage bypass. The presence of gp2.5 also promotes it. Thus, the interactions of polymerase with helicase and ssDNA-binding protein facilitate DNA damage bypass. Accessory proteins in other complicated DNA replisomes also facilitate bypassing DNA damage in similar manner. This work provides new mechanistic information relating to DNA damage bypass by the DNA replisome.

Coordinated DNA Replication by the Bacteriophage T4 Replisome

The T4 bacteriophage encodes eight proteins, which are sufficient to carry out coordinated leading and lagging strand DNA synthesis. These purified proteins have been used to reconstitute DNA synthesis in vitro and are a well-characterized model system. Recent work on the T4 replisome has yielded more detailed insight into the dynamics and coordination of proteins at the replication fork. Since the leading and lagging strands are synthesized in opposite directions, coordination of DNA synthesis as well as priming and unwinding is accomplished by several protein complexes. These protein complexes serve to link catalytic activities and physically tether proteins to the replication fork. Essential to both leading and lagging strand synthesis is the formation of a holoenzyme complex composed of the polymerase and a processivity clamp. The two holoenzymes form a dimer allowing the lagging strand polymerase to be retained within the replisome after completion of each Okazaki fragment. The helicase and primase also form a complex known as the primosome, which unwinds the duplex DNA while also synthesizing primers on the lagging strand. Future studies will likely focus on defining the orientations and architecture of protein complexes at the replication fork.

What we know but do not understand about nidovirus helicases

•

The ubiquitous nidovirus helicase is a multi-functional enzyme of superfamily 1.

•

Its unique N-terminal domain is most similar to the Upf1 multinuclear zinc-binding domain.

•

It has been implicated in replication, transcription, virion biogenesis, translation and post-transcriptional viral RNA processing.

•

Four different classes of antiviral compounds targeting the helicase have been identified.

Helicases are versatile NTP-dependent motor proteins of monophyletic origin that are found in all kingdoms of life. Their functions range from nucleic acid duplex unwinding to protein displacement and double-strand translocation. This explains their participation in virtually every metabolic process that involves nucleic acids, including DNA replication, recombination and repair, transcription, translation, as well as RNA processing. Helicases are encoded by all plant and animal viruses with a positive-sense RNA genome that is larger than 7 kb, indicating a link to genome size evolution in this virus class. Viral helicases belong to three out of the six currently recognized superfamilies, SF1, SF2, and SF3. Despite being omnipresent, highly conserved and essential, only a few viral helicases, mostly from SF2, have been studied extensively. In general, their specific roles in the viral replication cycle remain poorly understood at present. The SF1 helicase protein of viruses classified in the order Nidovirales is encoded in replicase open reading frame 1b (ORF1b), which is translated to give rise to a large polyprotein following a ribosomal frameshift from the upstream ORF1a. Proteolytic processing of the replicase polyprotein yields a dozen or so mature proteins, one of which includes a helicase. Its hallmark is the presence of an N-terminal multi-nuclear zinc-binding domain, the nidoviral genetic marker and one of the most conserved domains across members of the order. This review summarizes biochemical, structural, and genetic data, including drug development studies, obtained using helicases originating from several mammalian nidoviruses, along with the results of the genomics characterization of a much larger number of (putative) helicases of vertebrate and invertebrate nidoviruses. In the context of our knowledge of related helicases of cellular and viral origin, it discusses the implications of these results for the protein's emerging critical function(s) in nidovirus evolution, genome replication and expression, virion biogenesis, and possibly also post-transcriptional processing of viral RNAs. Using our accumulated knowledge and highlighting gaps in our data, concepts and approaches, it concludes with a perspective on future research aimed at elucidating the role of helicases in the nidovirus replication cycle.

Helicase and polymerase move together close to the fork junction and copy DNA in one-nucleotide steps

By simultaneously measuring DNA synthesis and dNTP hydrolysis, we show that T7 DNA polymerase and T7 gp4 helicase move in sync during leading-strand synthesis, taking one-nucleotide steps and hydrolyzing one dNTP per base-pair unwound/copied. The cooperative catalysis enables the helicase and polymerase to move at a uniformly fast rate without guanine:cytosine (GC) dependency or idling with futile NTP hydrolysis. We show that the helicase and polymerase are located close to the replication fork junction. This architecture enables the polymerase to use its strand-displacement synthesis to increase the unwinding rate, whereas the helicase aids this process by translocating along single-stranded DNA and trapping the unwound bases. Thus, in contrast to the helicase-only unwinding model, our results suggest a model in which the helicase and polymerase are moving in one-nucleotide steps, DNA synthesis drives fork unwinding, and a role of the helicase is to trap the unwound bases and prevent DNA reannealing.

Low-molecular-weight DNA replication intermediates in Escherichia coli: mechanism of formation and strand specificity

Chromosomal DNA replication intermediates, revealed in ligase-deficient conditions in vivo, are of low molecular weight (LMW) independently of the organism, suggesting discontinuous replication of both the leading and the lagging DNA strands. Yet, in vitro experiments with purified enzymes replicating sigma-structured substrates show continuous synthesis of the leading DNA strand in complete absence of ligase, supporting the textbook model of semi-discontinuous DNA replication. The discrepancy between the in vivo and in vitro results is rationalized by proposing that various excision repair events nick continuously synthesized leading strands after synthesis, producing the observed LMW intermediates. Here, we show that, in an Escherichia coli ligase-deficient strain with all known excision repair pathways inactivated, new DNA is still synthesized discontinuously. Furthermore, hybridization to strand-specific targets demonstrates that the LMW replication intermediates come from both the lagging and the leading strands. These results support the model of discontinuous leading strand synthesis in E. coli.

Collaborative coupling between polymerase and helicase for leading-strand synthesis

Rapid and processive leading-strand DNA synthesis in the bacteriophage T4 system requires functional coupling between the helicase and the holoenzyme, consisting of the polymerase and trimeric clamp loaded by the clamp loader. We investigated the mechanism of this coupling on a DNA hairpin substrate manipulated by a magnetic trap. In stark contrast to the isolated enzymes, the coupled system synthesized DNA at the maximum rate without exhibiting fork regression or pauses. DNA synthesis and unwinding activities were coupled at low forces, but became uncoupled displaying separate activities at high forces or low dNTP concentration. We propose a collaborative model in which the helicase releases the fork regression pressure on the holoenzyme allowing it to adopt a processive polymerization conformation and the holoenzyme destabilizes the first few base pairs of the fork thereby increasing the efficiency of helicase unwinding. The model implies that both enzymes are localized at the fork, but does not require a specific interaction between them. The model quantitatively reproduces homologous and heterologous coupling results under various experimental conditions.

Bypass of a nick by the replisome of bacteriophage T7

DNA polymerase and DNA helicase are essential components of DNA replication. The helicase unwinds duplex DNA to provide single-stranded templates for DNA synthesis by the DNA polymerase. In bacteriophage T7, movement of either the DNA helicase or the DNA polymerase alone terminates upon encountering a nick in duplex DNA. Using a minicircular DNA, we show that the helicase · polymerase complex can bypass a nick, albeit at reduced efficiency of 7%, on the non-template strand to continue rolling circle DNA synthesis. A gap in the non-template strand cannot be bypassed. The efficiency of bypass synthesis depends on the DNA sequence downstream of the nick. A nick on the template strand cannot be bypassed. Addition of T7 single-stranded DNA-binding protein to the complex stimulates nick bypass 2-fold. We propose that the association of helicase with the polymerase prevents dissociation of the helicase upon encountering a nick, allowing the helicase to continue unwinding of the duplex downstream of the nick.

Isothermal DNA amplification using the T4 replisome: circular nicking endonuclease-dependent amplification and primase-based whole-genome amplification

In vitro reconstitution of the bacteriophage T4 replication machinery provides a novel system for fast and processive isothermal DNA amplification. We have characterized this system in two formats: (i) in circular nicking endonuclease-dependent amplification (cNDA), the T4 replisome is supplemented with a nicking endonuclease (Nb.BbvCI) and a reverse primer to generate a well-defined uniform double-stranded linear product and to achieve up to 1100-fold linear amplification of a plasmid in 1 h. (ii) The T4 replisome with its primase (gp61) can also support priming and exponential amplification of genomic DNA in primase-based whole-genome amplification (T4 pWGA). Low amplification biases between 4.8 and 9.8 among eight loci for 0.3–10 ng template DNA suggest that this method is indeed suitable for uniform whole-genome amplification. Finally, the utility of the T4 replisome for isothermal DNA amplification is demonstrated in various applications, including incorporation of functional tags for DNA labeling and immobilization; template generation for in vitro transcription/translation and sequencing; and colony screening and DNA quantification.

Single-molecule studies of the replisome

Replication of DNA is carried out by the replisome, a multiprotein complex responsible for the unwinding of parental DNA and the synthesis of DNA on each of the two DNA strands. The impressive speed and processivity with which the replisome duplicates DNA are a result of a set of tightly regulated interactions between the replication proteins. The transient nature of these protein interactions makes it challenging to study the dynamics of the replisome by ensemble-averaging techniques. This review describes single-molecule methods that allow the study of individual replication proteins and their functioning within the replisome. The ability to mechanically manipulate individual DNA molecules and record the dynamic behavior of the replisome while it duplicates DNA has led to an improved understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying DNA replication.

Analysis of the DNA translocation and unwinding activities of T4 phage helicases

Helicases are an important class of enzymes involved in DNA and RNA metabolism that couple the energy of ATP hydrolysis to unwind duplex DNA and RNA structures. Understanding the mechanism of helicase action is vital due to their involvement in various biological processes such as DNA replication, repair and recombination. Furthermore, the duplex DNA unwinding property of this class of enzymes is closely related to their single-stranded DNA translocation. Hence the study of its translocation properties is essential to understanding helicase activity. Here we review the methods that are employed to analyze the DNA translocation and unwinding activities of the bacteriophage T4 UvsW and Dda helicases. These methods have been successfully employed to study the functions of helicases from large superfamilies.

Single-molecule studies of DNA replisome function

Fast and accurate replication of DNA is accomplished by the interactions of multiple proteins in the dynamic DNA replisome. The DNA replisome effectively coordinates the leading and lagging strand synthesis of DNA. These complex, yet elegantly organized, molecular machines have been studied extensively by kinetic and structural methods to provide an in-depth understanding of the mechanism of DNA replication. Owing to averaging of observables, unique dynamic information of the biochemical pathways and reactions is concealed in conventional ensemble methods. However, recent advances in the rapidly expanding field of single-molecule analyses to study single biomolecules offer opportunities to probe and understand the dynamic processes involved in large biomolecular complexes such as replisomes. This review will focus on the recent developments in the biochemistry and biophysics of DNA replication employing single-molecule techniques and the insights provided by these methods towards a better understanding of the intricate mechanisms of DNA replication.

Mechanisms of single-stranded DNA-binding protein functioning in cellular DNA metabolism

This review deals with analysis of mechanisms involved in coordination of DNA replication and repair by SSB proteins; characteristics of eukaryotic, prokaryotic, and archaeal SSB proteins are considered, which made it possible to distinguish general mechanisms specific for functioning of proteins from organisms of different life domains. Mechanisms of SSB protein interactions with DNA during metabolism of the latter are studied; structural organization of the SSB protein complexes with DNA, as well as structural and functional peculiarities of different SSB proteins are analyzed.

The replication intermediates in Escherichia coli are not the product of DNA processing or uracil excision

The current model of DNA replication in Escherichia coli postulates continuous synthesis of the leading strand, based on in vitro experiments with purified enzymes. In contrast, in vivo experiments in E. coli and its bacteriophages, in which maturation of replication intermediates was blocked, report discontinuous DNA synthesis of both the lagging and the leading strands. To address this discrepancy, we analyzed nascent DNA species from ThyA+ E. coli cells replicating their DNA in ligase-deficient conditions to block maturation of replication intermediates. We report here that the bulk of the newly synthesized DNA isolated from ligase-deficient cells have a length between 0.3 and 3 kb, with a minor fraction being longer that 11 kb but shorter than the chromosome. The low molecular weight of the replication intermediates is unchanged by blocking linear DNA processing with a recBCD mutation or by blocking uracil excision with an ung mutation. These results are consistent with the previously proposed discontinuous replication of the leading strand in E. coli.

Site-directed mutations of T4 helicase loading protein (gp59) reveal multiple modes of DNA polymerase inhibition and the mechanism of unlocking by gp41 helicase

The T4 helicase loading protein (gp59) interacts with a multitude of DNA replication proteins. In an effort to determine the functional consequences of these protein-protein interactions, point mutations were introduced into the gp59 protein. Mutations were chosen based on the available crystal structure and focused on hydrophobic residues with a high degree of solvent accessibility. Characterization of the mutant proteins revealed a single mutation, Y122A, which is defective in polymerase binding and has weakened affinity for the helicase. The interaction between single-stranded DNA-binding protein and Y122A is unaffected, as is the affinity of Y122A for DNA substrates. When standard concentrations of helicase are employed, Y122A is unable to productively load the helicase onto forked DNA substrates. As a result of the loss of polymerase binding, Y122A cannot inhibit the polymerase during nucleotide idling or prevent it from removing the primer strand of a D-loop. However, Y122A is capable of inhibiting strand displacement synthesis by polymerase. The retention of strand displacement inhibition by Y122A, even in the absence of a gp59-polymerase interaction, indicates that there are two modes of polymerase inhibition by gp59. Inhibition of the polymerase activity only requires gp59 to bind to the replication fork, whereas inhibition of the exonuclease activity requires an interaction between the polymerase and gp59. The inability of Y122A to interact with both the polymerase and the helicase suggests a mechanism for polymerase unlocking by the helicase based on a direct competition between the helicase and polymerase for an overlapping binding site on gp59.

DNA synthesis provides the driving force to accelerate DNA unwinding by a helicase

Helicases are molecular motors that use the energy of nucleoside 5'-triphosphate (NTP) hydrolysis to translocate along a nucleic acid strand and catalyse reactions such as DNA unwinding. The ring-shaped helicase of bacteriophage T7 translocates along single-stranded (ss)DNA at a speed of 130 bases per second; however, T7 helicase slows down nearly tenfold when unwinding the strands of duplex DNA. Here, we report that T7 DNA polymerase, which is unable to catalyse strand displacement DNA synthesis by itself, can increase the unwinding rate to 114 base pairs per second, bringing the helicase up to similar speeds compared to its translocation along ssDNA. The helicase rate of stimulation depends upon the DNA synthesis rate and does not rely on specific interactions between T7 DNA polymerase and the carboxy-terminal residues of T7 helicase. Efficient duplex DNA synthesis is achieved only by the combined action of the helicase and polymerase. The strand displacement DNA synthesis by the DNA polymerase depends on the unwinding activity of the helicase, which provides ssDNA template. The rapid trapping of the ssDNA bases by the DNA synthesis activity of the polymerase in turn drives the helicase to move forward through duplex DNA at speeds similar to those observed along ssDNA.

The oligomeric T4 primase is the functional form during replication

Replisome DNA primases are responsible for the synthesis of short RNA primers required for the initiation of repetitive Okazaki fragment synthesis on the lagging strand during DNA replication. In bacteriophage T4, the primase (gp61) interacts with the helicase (gp41) to form the primosome complex, an interaction that greatly stimulates the priming activity of gp61. Because gp41 is hexameric, a question arises as to whether gp61 also forms a hexameric structure during replication. Several results from this study support such a structure. Titration of the primase/single-stranded DNA binding followed by fluorescence anisotropy implicated a 6:1 stoichiometry. The observed rate constant, k(cat), for priming was found to increase with the primase concentration, implicating an oligomeric form of the primase as the major functional species. The generation of hetero-oligomeric populations of the hexameric primase by controlled mixing of wild type and an inactive mutant primase confirmed the oligomeric nature of the most active primase form. Mutant primases defective in either the N- or C-terminal domains and catalytically inactive could be mixed to create oligomeric primases with restored catalytic activity suggesting an active site shared between subunits. Collectively, these results provide strong evidence for the functional oligomerization of gp61. The potential roles of gp61 oligomerization during lagging strand synthesis are discussed.

Mutations of bacteriophage T4 59 helicase loader defective in binding fork DNA and in interactions with T4 32 single-stranded DNA-binding protein

Bacteriophage T4 gene 59 protein greatly stimulates the loading of the T4 gene 41 helicase in vitro and is required for recombination and recombination-dependent DNA replication in vivo. 59 protein binds preferentially to forked DNA and interacts directly with the T4 41 helicase and gene 32 single-stranded DNA-binding protein. The helicase loader is an almost completely alpha-helical, two-domain protein, whose N-terminal domain has strong structural similarity to the DNA-binding domains of high mobility group proteins. We have previously speculated that this high mobility group-like region may bind the duplex ahead of the fork, with the C-terminal domain providing separate binding sites for the fork arms and at least part of the docking area for the helicase and 32 protein. Here, we characterize several mutants of 59 protein in an initial effort to test this model. We find that the I87A mutation, at the position where the fork arms would separate in the model, is defective in binding fork DNA. As a consequence, it is defective in stimulating both unwinding by the helicase and replication by the T4 system. 59 protein with a deletion of the two C-terminal residues, Lys(216) and Tyr(217), binds fork DNA normally. In contrast to the wild type, the deletion protein fails to promote binding of 32 protein on short fork DNA. However, it binds 32 protein in the absence of DNA. The deletion is also somewhat defective in stimulating unwinding of fork DNA by the helicase and replication by the T4 system. We suggest that the absence of the two terminal residues may alter the configuration of the lagging strand fork arm on the surface of the C-terminal domain, so that it is a poorer docking site for the helicase and 32 protein.

Dual functions of single-stranded DNA-binding protein in helicase loading at the bacteriophage T4 DNA replication fork

Semi-conservative DNA synthesis reactions catalyzed by the bacteriophage T4 DNA polymerase holoenzyme are initiated by a strand displacement mechanism requiring gp32, the T4 single-stranded DNA (ssDNA)-binding protein, to sequester the displaced strand. After initiation, DNA helicase acquisition by the nascent replication fork leads to a dramatic increase in the rate and processivity of leading strand DNA synthesis. In vitro studies have established that either of two T4-encoded DNA helicases, gp41 or dda, is capable of stimulating strand displacement synthesis. The acquisition of either helicase by the nascent replication fork is modulated by other protein components of the fork including gp32 and, in the case of the gp41 helicase, its mediator/loading protein gp59. Here, we examine the relationships between gp32 and the gp41/gp59 and dda helicase systems, respectively, during T4 replication using altered forms of gp32 defective in either protein-protein or protein-ssDNA interactions. We show that optimal stimulation of DNA synthesis by gp41/gp59 helicase requires gp32-gp59 interactions and is strongly dependent on the stability of ssDNA binding by gp32. Fluorescence assays demonstrate that gp59 binds stoichiometrically to forked DNA molecules; however, gp59-forked DNA complexes are destabilized via protein-protein interactions with the C-terminal "A-domain" fragment of gp32. These and previously published results suggest a model in which a mobile gp59-gp32 cluster bound to lagging strand ssDNA is the target for gp41 helicase assembly. In contrast, stimulation of DNA synthesis by dda helicase requires direct gp32-dda protein-protein interactions and is relatively unaffected by mutations in gp32 that destabilize its ssDNA binding activity. The latter data support a model in which protein-protein interactions with gp32 maintain dda in a proper active state for translocation at the replication fork. The relationship between dda and gp32 proteins in T4 replication appears similar to the relationship observed between the UL9 helicase and ICP8 ssDNA-binding protein in herpesvirus replication.

Bacteriophage T4 32 protein is required for helicase-dependent leading strand synthesis when the helicase is loaded by the T4 59 helicase-loading protein

In the bacteriophage T4 DNA replication system, T4 gene 59 protein binds preferentially to fork DNA and accelerates the loading of the T4 41 helicase. 59 protein also binds the T4 32 single-stranded DNA-binding protein that coats the lagging strand template. Here we explore the function of the strong affinity between the 32 and 59 proteins at the replication fork. We show that, in contrast to the 59 helicase loader, 32 protein does not bind forked DNA more tightly than linear DNA. 32 protein displays a strong binding polarity on fork DNA, binding with much higher affinity to the 5' single-stranded lagging strand template arm of a model fork, than to the 3' single-stranded leading strand arm. 59 protein promotes the binding of 32 protein on forks too short for cooperative binding by 32 protein. We show that 32 protein is required for helicase-dependent leading strand DNA synthesis when the helicase is loaded by 59 protein. However, 32 protein is not required for leading strand synthesis when helicase is loaded, less efficiently, without 59 protein. Leading strand synthesis by wild type T4 polymerase is strongly inhibited when 59 protein is present without 32 protein. Because 59 protein can load the helicase on forks without 32 protein, our results are best explained by a model in which 59 helicase loader at the fork prevents the coupling of the leading strand polymerase and the helicase, unless the position of 59 protein is shifted by its association with 32 protein.

The application of a minicircle substrate in the study of the coordinated T4 DNA replication

A reconstituted in vitro bacteriophage T4 DNA replication system was studied on a synthetic 70-mer minicircle substrate. This substrate was designed so that dGMP and dCMP were exclusively incorporated into the leading and the lagging strand, respectively. This design allows the simultaneous and independent measurement of the leading and lagging strand synthesis. In this paper, we report our results on the characterization of the 70-mer minicircle substrate. We show here that the minicircle substrate supports coordinated leading and lagging strand synthesis under the experimental conditions employed. The rate of the leading strand fork movement was at an average of approximately 150 nucleotides/s. This rate decreased to less than 30 nucleotides/s when the helicase was omitted from the reaction. These results suggest that both the holoenzyme and the primosome can be simultaneously assembled onto the minicircle substrate. The lagging strand synthesized on this substrate is of an average of 1.5 kb, and the length of the Okazaki fragments increased with decreasing [rNTPs]. The proper response of the Okazaki fragment size toward the change of the priming signal further indicates a functional replisome assembled on the minicircle template. The effects of various protein components on the leading and lagging strand synthesis were also studied. The collective results indicate that coordinated strand synthesis only takes place within certain protein concentration ranges. The optimal protein levels of the proteins that constitute the T4 replisome generally bracket the concentrations of the same proteins in vivo. Omission of the primase has little effect on the rate of dNMP incorporation or the rate of the fork movement on the leading strand within the first 30 s of the reaction. This inhibition only becomes significant at later times of the reaction and may be associated with the accumulation of single-stranded DNA leading to the collapse of active replisomes.

Protein-protein interactions in the bacteriophage T4 replisome. The leading strand holoenzyme is physically linked to the lagging strand holoenzyme and the primosome

The bacteriophage T4 replication complex is composed of eight proteins that function together to replicate DNA. This replisome can be broken down into four basic units: a primosome composed of gp41, gp61, and gp59; a leading strand holoenzyme composed of gp43, gp44/62, and gp45; a lagging strand holoenzyme; and a single strand binding protein polymer. These units interact further to form the complete replisome. The leading and lagging strand polymerases are physically linked in the presence of DNA or an active replisome. The region of interaction was mapped to an extension of the finger domain, such that Cys-507 of one subunit is in close proximity to Cys-507 of a second subunit. The leading strand polymerase and the primosome also associate, such that gp59 mediates the contact between the two complexes. Binding of gp43 to the primosome complex causes displacement of gp32 from the gp59.gp61.gp41 primosome complex. The resultant species is a complex of proteins that may allow coordinated leading and lagging strand synthesis, helicase DNA unwinding activity, and polymerase nucleotide incorporation.

Replisome-mediated DNA replication

The elaborate process of genomic replication requires a large collection of proteins properly assembled at a DNA replication fork. Several decades of research on the bacterium Escherichia coli and its bacteriophages T4 and T7 have defined the roles of many proteins central to DNA replication. These three different prokaryotic replication systems use the same fundamental components for synthesis at a moving DNA replication fork even though the number and nature of some individual proteins are different and many lack extensive sequence homology. The components of the replication complex can be grouped into functional categories as follows: DNA polymerase, helix destabilizing protein, polymerase accessory factors, and primosome (DNA helicase and DNA primase activities). The replication of DNA derives from a multistep enzymatic pathway that features the assembly of accessory factors and polymerases into a functional holoenzyme; the separation of the double-stranded template DNA by helicase activity and its coupling to the primase synthesis of RNA primers to initiate Okazaki fragment synthesis; and the continuous and discontinuous synthesis of the leading and lagging daughter strands by the polymerases. This review summarizes and compares and contrasts for these three systems the types, timing, and mechanism of reactions and of protein-protein interactions required to initiate, control, and coordinate the synthesis of the leading and lagging strands at a DNA replication fork and comments on their generality.

Mutations in the N-terminal cooperativity domain of gene 32 protein alter properties of the T4 DNA replication and recombination systems

The gene 32 protein (gp32) of bacteriophage T4 is the essential single-stranded DNA (ssDNA)-binding protein required for phage DNA replication and recombination. gp32 binds ssDNA with high affinity and cooperativity, forming contiguous clusters that optimally configure the ssDNA for recognition by DNA polymerase or recombination enzymes. The precise roles of gp32 affinity and cooperativity in promoting replication and recombination have yet to be defined, however. Previous work established that the N-terminal "B-domain" of gp32 is essential for cooperativity and that point mutations at Arg(4) and Lys(3) positions have varying and dramatic effects on gp32-ssDNA interactions. Therefore, we examined the effects of six different gp32 B-domain mutants on T4 in vitro systems for DNA synthesis and homologous pairing. We find that the B-domain is essential for gp32's stimulation of these reactions. The stimulatory efficacy of gp32 B-domain mutants generally correlates with the hierarchy of relative ssDNA binding affinities, i.e. wild-type gp32 approximately R4K > K3A approximately R4Q > R4T > R4G gp32-B. However, the functional defect of a particular mutant is often greater than can be explained simply by its ability to saturate the ssDNA at equilibrium, suggesting additional defects in the proper assembly and activity of DNA polymerase and recombinase complexes on ssDNA, which may derive from a decreased lifetime of gp32-ssDNA clusters.

Characterization of bacteriophage T4-coordinated leading- and lagging-strand synthesis on a minicircle substrate

The DNA replication complex of bacteriophage T4 has been assembled as a single unit on a minicircle substrate with a replication fork that permits an independent measurement of the amount of DNA synthesis on both the leading and lagging strands. The assembled replisome consists of the T4 polymerase [gene product 43 (gp43)], clamp protein (gp45), clamp loader (gp44/62), helicase (gp41), helicase accessory factor (gp59), primase (gp61), and single-stranded DNA binding protein (gp32). We demonstrate that on the minicircle the synthesis of the leading and lagging strands are coordinated and that the C-terminal domain of the gp32 protein regulates this coordination. We show that the reconstituted replisome encompasses two coupled holoenzyme complexes and present evidence that this coupling might include a gp43 homodimer interaction.

Replication slippage of different DNA polymerases is inversely related to their strand displacement efficiency

Replication slippage is a particular type of error caused by DNA polymerases believed to occur both in bacterial and eukaryotic cells. Previous studies have shown that deletion events can occur in Escherichia coli by replication slippage between short duplications and that the main E. coli polymerase, DNA polymerase III holoenzyme is prone to such slippage. In this work, we present evidence that the two other DNA polymerases of E. coli, DNA polymerase I and DNA polymerase II, as well as polymerases of two phages, T4 (T4 pol) and T7 (T7 pol), undergo slippage in vitro, whereas DNA polymerase from another phage, Phi29, does not. Furthermore, we have measured the strand displacement activity of the different polymerases tested for slippage in the absence and in the presence of the E. coli single-stranded DNA-binding protein (SSB), and we show that: (i) polymerases having a strong strand displacement activity cannot slip (DNA polymerase from Phi29); (ii) polymerases devoid of any strand displacement activity slip very efficiently (DNA polymerase II and T4 pol); and (iii) stimulation of the strand displacement activity by E. coli SSB (DNA polymerase I and T7 pol), by phagic SSB (T4 pol), or by a mutation that affects the 3' --> 5' exonuclease domain (DNA polymerase II exo(-) and T7 pol exo(-)) is correlated with the inhibition of slippage. We propose that these observations can be interpreted in terms of a model, for which we have shown that high strand displacement activity of a polymerase diminishes its propensity to slip.

Expansion and deletion of triplet repeat sequences in Escherichia coli occur on the leading strand of DNA replication

Expansions and deletions of triplet repeat sequences that cause human hereditary neurological diseases were previously suggested to be mediated by the formation of DNA hairpins on the lagging strand during replication. The replication properties of CTG.CAG, CGG.CCG, and TTC.GAA repeats were studied in Escherichia coli using an in vivo phagemid system as a model for continuous leading strand synthesis. The repeats were substantially deleted when the CTG, CGG, and GAA repeats were the templates for rolling circle replication from the f1 phage origin. The deletions may be mediated by hairpins formed by these repeat tracts. The distributions of the deletion products of the CTG.CAG and CGG.CCG tracts indicated that hairpins of discrete sizes mediate deletions during complementary strand synthesis. Deletions during rolling circle synthesis are caused by larger hairpins of specific sizes. Thus, most deletion products were of defined lengths, suggesting a preference for specific hairpin intermediates. Small expansions of the CTG.CAG and CGG.CCG repeats were also observed, presumably due to the formation of CTG and CGG hairpins on the nascent complementary strand. Since rolling circle replication has been established in vitro as a model for leading strand synthesis, we conclude that triplet repeat instability can also occur on the leading strand of DNA replication.

A novel assay for examining the molecular reactions at the eukaryotic replication fork: activities of replication protein A required during elongation

Studies to elucidate the reactions that occur at the eukaryotic replication fork have been limited by the model systems available. We have established a method for isolating and characterizing Simian Virus 40 (SV40) replication complexes. SV40 rolling circle complexes are isolated using paramagnetic beads and then incubated under replication conditions to obtain continued elongation. In rolling circle replication, the normal mechanism for termination of SV40 replication does not occur and the elongation phase of replication is prolonged. Thus, using this assay system, elongation phase reactions can be examined in the absence of initiation or termination. We show that the protein requirements for elongation of SV40 rolling circles are equivalent to complete SV40 replication reactions. The DNA produced by SV40 rolling circles is double-stranded, unmethylated and with a much longer length than the template DNA. These properties are similar to those of physiological replication forks. We show that proteins associated with the isolated rolling circles, including SV40 T antigen, DNA polymerase alpha, replication protein A (RPA) and RF-C, are necessary for continued DNA synthesis. PCNA is also required but is not associated with the isolated complexes. We present evidence suggesting that synthesis of the leading and lagging strands are co-ordinated in SV40 rolling circle replication. We have used this system to show that both RPA-protein and RPA-DNA interactions are important for RPA's function in elongation.

Bacteriophage T4 initiates bidirectional DNA replication through a two-step process

Two-dimensional gel analysis of the bacteriophage T4 ori(uvsY) region revealed a novel "comet" on the Y arc. This comet contains simple Y molecules in which the branch points map to the ori(uvsY) transcript region. The comet depends on the the origin and DNA synthesis and is abolished by a mutation that reduces replication without affecting transcription. These results argue that the branched molecules are intermediates in replication initiation. A transcriptional terminator, cloned just downstream of the origin promoter, shortened the tail of the comet. Therefore, the location of the transcript determines the DNA branch points. We conclude that the comet DNA consists of intermediates in which unidirectional replication has been triggered by priming from the RNA of the origin R loop.

Simultaneous formation of functional leading and lagging strand holoenzyme complexes on a small, defined DNA substrate

The biochemical characterization of leading and lagging strand DNA synthesis by bacteriophage T4 replication proteins has been addressed utilizing a small, defined primer/template. The ATP hydrolysis activity of 44/62, the clamp loading complex responsible for holoenzyme assembly, was monitored during assembly of both the leading and lagging strand holoenzyme complex. The ATPase activity of 44/62 diminishes once a functional holoenzyme is assembled on both the leading and lagging strand. The assembly of the lagging strand holoenzyme is facilitated by several factors including biotinylated streptavidin blocks at the end of the fork strands, preassembly of the leading strand holoenzyme, and by the presence of the DNA primase with ribonucleoside triphosphates. The resultant minimal replicative complex consists of two holoenzymes and a primase nested on a model replication fork derived from a 62-mer template/34-mer primer/36-mer lagging strand in an apparent 2:2:1:1 ratio of 45 protein:polymerase:primase:forked DNA. The 44/62 protein complex does not remain associated with the complex. The primase alone slowly synthesizes pentaribonucleotides on the forked DNA when the lagging strand contains a nonannealed TTG initiation site with the rate of synthesis greatly stimulated by the addition of the 41 helicase. The addition of deoxy-NTPs to this complex results in leading strand synthesis, but extension of the synthesized RNA primer does not occur. DNA synthesis in both the leading and lagging strand directions is achieved, however, when a 6-mer DNA primer is annealed to the primase recognition site of the forked DNA substrate. A model is presented that describes how leading and lagging strand DNA synthesis might be coordinated as well as the associated molecular interactions of the replicative proteins.

Strand displacement associated DNA synthesis catalyzed by the Epstein-Barr virus DNA polymerase

The Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA polymerase (Pol) holoenzyme is an essential enzyme required for ori-Lyt dependent EBV DNA replication. Using singly primed M13ssDNA circles as template, the EBV DNA Pol holoenzyme synthesized DNA chains greater than the unit length of M13 ssDNA in addition to full length products even at a low ratio of polymerase molecule per templates. The long replication products consisted of circular double-stranded DNA with single-stranded tails that were sensitive to mung bean nuclease. Reconstitution of the EBV Pol holoenzyme by preincubation of BALF5 Pol catalytic subunit and BMRF1 Pol accessory subunit in vitro resulted in reproduction of the strand displacement DNA synthesis. Thus, the EBV DNA Pol holoenzyme by itself is able to produce strand displacement coupled to the polymerization process in a highly processive way in the absence of any other protein.

Role of the bacteriophage T7 and T4 single-stranded DNA-binding proteins in the formation of joint molecules and DNA helicase-catalyzed polar branch migration

Bacteriophage T7 gene 2.5 single-stranded DNA-binding protein and gene 4 DNA helicase together promote pairing of two homologous DNA molecules and subsequent polar branch migration (Kong, D., and Richardson, C. C. (1996) EMBO J. 15, 2010-2019). In this report, we show that gene 2.5 protein is not required for the initiation or propagation of strand transfer once a joint molecule has been formed between the two DNA partners, a reaction that is mediated by the gene 2.5 protein alone. A mutant gene 2.5 protein, gene 2.5-Delta21C protein, lacking 21 amino acid residues at its C terminus, cannot physically interact with gene 4 protein. Although it does bind to single-stranded DNA and promote the formation of joint molecule via homologous base pairing, subsequent strand transfer by gene 4 helicase is inhibited by the presence of the gene 2.5-Delta21C protein. Bacteriophage T4 gene 32 protein likewise inhibits T7 gene 4 protein-mediated strand transfer, whereas Escherichia coli single-stranded DNA-binding protein does not. The 63-kDa gene 4 protein of phage T7 is also a DNA primase in that it catalyzes the synthesis of oligonucleotides at specific sequences during translocation on single-stranded DNA. We find that neither the rate nor extent of strand transfer is significantly affected by concurrent primer synthesis. The bacteriophage T4 gene 41 helicase has been shown to catalyze polar branch migration after the T4 gene 59 helicase assembly protein loads the helicase onto joint molecules formed by the T4 UvsX and gene 32 proteins (Salinas, F., and Kodadek, T. (1995) Cell 82, 111-119). We find that gene 32 protein alone forms joint molecules between partially single-stranded homologous DNA partners and that subsequent branch migration requires this single-stranded DNA-binding protein in addition to the gene 41 helicase and the gene 59 helicase assembly protein. Similar to the strand transfer reaction, strand displacement DNA synthesis catalyzed by T4 DNA polymerase also requires the presence of gene 32 protein in addition to the gene 41 and 59 proteins.

A coupled complex of T4 DNA replication helicase (gp41) and polymerase (gp43) can perform rapid and processive DNA strand-displacement synthesis

We have developed a coupled helicase-polymerase DNA unwinding assay and have used it to monitor the rate of double-stranded DNA unwinding catalyzed by the phage T4 DNA replication helicase (gp41). This procedure can be used to follow helicase activity in subpopulations in systems in which the unwinding-synthesis reaction is not synchronized on all the substrate-template molecules. We show that T4 replication helicase (gp41) and polymerase (gp43) can be assembled onto a loading site located near the end of a long double-stranded DNA template in the presence of a macro-molecular crowding agent, and that this coupled "two-protein" system can carry out ATP-dependent strand displacement DNA synthesis at physiological rates (400 to 500 bp per sec) and with high processivity in the absence of other T4 DNA replication proteins. These results suggest that a direct helicase-polymerase interaction may be central to fast and processive double-stranded DNA replication, and lead us to reconsider the roles of the other replication proteins in processivity control.

tau couples the leading- and lagging-strand polymerases at the Escherichia coli DNA replication fork

Synthesis of an Okazaki fragment occurs once every 1 or 2 s at the Escherichia coli replication fork. To account for the rapid recycling required of the lagging-strand polymerase, it has been proposed that it is held at the replication fork by protein-protein interactions with the leading-strand polymerase as part of a dimeric polymerase assembly. Solution studies showed that the replicative polymerase, the DNA polymerase III holoenzyme, was indeed a dimer with two catalytic cores held together by the tau subunit. However, the functionality of this arrangement at the replication fork has never been demonstrated. We showed previously that the lagging-strand polymerase acted processively during multiple rounds of Okazaki fragment synthesis, i.e. the same polymerase core assembly synthesized each and every fragment made by the fork. Using extreme dilution of active replication forks and the isolation of protein-DNA complexes capable of supporting coupled leading- and lagging-strand synthesis, we demonstrate here that this coupling of leading- and lagging-strand synthesis is, in fact, mediated by the tau subunit of the holoenzyme acting as a physical bridge between the core assemblies synthesizing the leading and lagging strands.

Processivity of the gene 41 DNA helicase at the bacteriophage T4 DNA replication fork

The gene 41 protein is the DNA helicase associated with the bacteriophage T4 DNA replication fork. This protein is a major component of the primosome, being essential for coordinated leading and lagging strand DNA synthesis. Models suggest that such DNA helicases are loaded only onto DNA at origins of replication, and that they remain with the ensuing replication fork until replication is terminated. To test this idea, we have measured the extent of processivity of the 41 protein in the context of an in vitro DNA replication system composed of eight purified proteins (the gene 43, 44/62, 45, 32, 41, 59, and 61 proteins). After starting DNA replication in the presence of these proteins, we diluted the 41 helicase enough to prevent any association of new helicase molecules and analyzed the replication products. We measured an association half-life of 11 min, revealing that the 41 protein is processive enough to finish replicating the entire 169-kilobase T4 genome at the observed replication rate of approximately 400 nucleotides/s. This processivity of the 41 protein does not require the 59 protein, the protein that catalyzes 41 protein assembly onto 32 protein-covered single-stranded DNA. The stability we measure for the 41 protein as part of the replication fork is greater than estimated for it alone on single-stranded DNA. We suggest that the 41 protein interacts with the polymerase holoenzyme at the fork, both stabilizing the other protein components and being stabilized thereby.

DNA polymerase delta holoenzyme: action on single-stranded DNA and on double-stranded DNA in the presence of replicative DNA helicases

DNA polymerase delta requires proliferating cell nuclear antigen and replication factor C to form a holoenzyme efficient in DNA synthesis. We have analyzed three different aspects of calf thymus DNA polymerase delta holoenzyme: (i) analysis of pausing during DNA synthesis, (ii) replication of double-stranded DNA in the absence of additional factors, and (iii) replication of double-stranded DNA in the presence of the two known replicative DNA helicases from simian virus 40 and bovine papilloma virus. DNA polymerase delta holoenzyme replicated primed single-stranded DNA at a rate of 100-300 nucleotides/min, partially overcoming multiple pause sites on DNA. While Escherichia coli single-strand DNA binding protein helped DNA polymerase delta pass through pause sites, the DNA polymerase delta itself appeared to dissociate from the template in the absence of synthesis or when encountering pause sites. Proliferating cell nuclear antigen likely remained on the template. DNA polymerase delta holoenzyme could perform limited strand displacement synthesis on double-stranded gapped circular DNA, and this reaction was not stimulated either by replication protein A or by E. coli single-strand DNA binding protein. DNA polymerase delta holoenzyme could efficiently cooperate with replicative DNA helicases from simian virus 40 (large T antigen) and bovine papilloma virus 1 (protein E1) in replication through double-stranded DNA in a reaction that required replication protein A or E. coli single-strand DNA binding protein.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Three new DNA helicases from Saccharomyces cerevisiae

At least six DNA helicases have been identified during fractionation of extracts from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Three of those, DNA helicases B, C, and D, have been further purified and characterized. DNA helicases B and C co-purified with DNA polymerase delta through several chromatographic steps, but were separated from the polymerase by hydrophobic chromatography. DNA helicase D co-purified with Replication Factor C over seven chromatographic steps, and was only separated from it by glycerol gradient centrifugation in the presence of 0.2 M NaCl. All three helicases are DNA dependent ATPases with Km values for ATP of 190 microM, 325 microM, and 60 microM for DNA helicases B, C, and D, respectively. Their DNA helicase activities are comparable. They are 5'-3' helicases and have pH optima of 6.5-7 and Mg2+ optima of 1-2 mM. However, they differ in the nucleotide requirement for helicase action. Whereas all three helicases preferred ATP, dATP, UTP, CTP, and dCTP as cofactors, DNA helicase C also used GTP, but not dTTP. On the other hand, DNA helicase D used dTTP, but not GTP, and DNA helicase B used neither nucleotide as cofactor. These studies allowed us to conclude that DNA helicases B, C, and D are not only distinct enzymes, but also different from two previously identified yeast DNA helicases, the RAD3 protein and ATPase III.