Role of the A protein-binding sites in the in vitro transposition of mu DNA. A complex circuit of interactions involving the mu ends and the transpositional enhancer

The effect of DNA-binding proteins on insertion sequence element transposition upstream of the bgl operon in Escherichia coli

The bglGFB operon in Escherichia coli K-12 strain BW25113, encoding the proteins necessary for the uptake and metabolism of β-glucosides, is normally not expressed. Insertion of either IS1 or IS5 upstream of the bgl promoter activates expression of the operon only when the cell is starving in the presence of a β-glucoside, drastically increasing transcription and allowing the cell to survive and grow using this carbon source. Details surrounding the exact mechanism and regulation of the IS insertional event remain unclear. In this work, the role of several DNA-binding proteins in how they affect the rate of insertion upstream of bgl are examined via mutation assays and protocols measuring transcription. Both Crp and IHF exert a positive effect on insertional Bgl+ mutations when present, active, and functional in the cell. Our results characterize IHF's effect in conjunction with other mutations, show that IHF's effect on IS insertion into bgl also affects other operons, and indicate that it may exert its effect by binding to and altering the DNA conformation of IS1 and IS5 in their native locations, rather than by directly influencing transposase gene expression. In contrast, the cAMP-CRP complex acts directly upon the bgl operon by binding upstream of the promoter, presumably altering local DNA into a conformation that enhances IS insertion.

Transposable Phage Mu

Transposable phage Mu has played a major role in elucidating the mechanism of movement of mobile DNA elements. The high efficiency of Mu transposition has facilitated a detailed biochemical dissection of the reaction mechanism, as well as of protein and DNA elements that regulate transpososome assembly and function. The deduced phosphotransfer mechanism involves in-line orientation of metal ion-activated hydroxyl groups for nucleophilic attack on reactive diester bonds, a mechanism that appears to be used by all transposable elements examined to date. A crystal structure of the Mu transpososome is available. Mu differs from all other transposable elements in encoding unique adaptations that promote its viral lifestyle. These adaptations include multiple DNA (enhancer, SGS) and protein (MuB, HU, IHF) elements that enable efficient Mu end synapsis, efficient target capture, low target specificity, immunity to transposition near or into itself, and efficient mechanisms for recruiting host repair and replication machineries to resolve transposition intermediates. MuB has multiple functions, including target capture and immunity. The SGS element promotes gyrase-mediated Mu end synapsis, and the enhancer, aided by HU and IHF, participates in directing a unique topological architecture of the Mu synapse. The function of these DNA and protein elements is important during both lysogenic and lytic phases. Enhancer properties have been exploited in the design of mini-Mu vectors for genetic engineering. Mu ends assembled into active transpososomes have been delivered directly into bacterial, yeast, and human genomes, where they integrate efficiently, and may prove useful for gene therapy.

Controlling DNA degradation from a distance: a new role for the Mu transposition enhancer

Phage Mu is unique among transposable elements in employing a transposition enhancer. The enhancer DNA segment is the site where the transposase MuA binds and makes bridging interactions with the two Mu ends, interwrapping the ends with the enhancer in a complex topology essential for assembling a catalytically active transpososome. The enhancer is also the site at which regulatory proteins control divergent transcription of genes that determine the phage lysis-lysogeny decision. Here we report a third function for the enhancer - that of regulating degradation of extraneous DNA attached to both ends of infecting Mu. This DNA is protected from nucleases by a phage protein until Mu integrates into the host chromosome, after which it is rapidly degraded. We find that leftward transcription at the enhancer, expected to disrupt its topology within the transpososome, blocks degradation of this DNA. Disruption of the enhancer would lead to the loss or dislocation of two non-catalytic MuA subunits positioned in the transpososome by the enhancer. We provide several lines of support for this inference, and conclude that these subunits are important for activating degradation of the flanking DNA. This work also reveals a role for enhancer topology in phage development.

The μ transpososome structure sheds light on DDE recombinase evolution

Studies of bacteriophage Mu transposition paved the way for understanding retroviral integration and V(D)J recombination as well as many other DNA transposition reactions. Here we report the structure of the Mu transpososome--Mu transposase (MuA) in complex with bacteriophage DNA ends and target DNA--determined from data that extend anisotropically to 5.2 Å, 5.2 Å and 3.7 Å resolution, in conjunction with previously determined structures of individual domains. The highly intertwined structure illustrates why chemical activity depends on formation of the synaptic complex, and reveals that individual domains have different roles when bound to different sites. The structure also provides explanations for the increased stability of the final product complex and for its preferential recognition by the ATP-dependent unfoldase ClpX. Although MuA and many other recombinases share a structurally conserved 'DDE' catalytic domain, comparisons among the limited set of available complex structures indicate that some conserved features, such as catalysis in trans and target DNA bending, arose through convergent evolution because they are important for function.

DNA sequence requirements for hobo transposable element transposition in Drosophila melanogaster

We have conducted a structure and functional analysis of the hobo transposable element of Drosophila melanogaster. A minimum of 141 bp of the left (L) end and 65 bp of the right (R) end of the hobo were shown to contain sequences sufficient for transposition. Both ends of hobo contain multiple copies of the motifs GGGTG and GTGGC and we show that the frequency of hobo transposition increases as a function of the copy number of these motifs. The R end of hobo contains a unique 12 bp internal inverted repeat that is identical to the hobo terminal inverted repeats. We show that this internal inverted repeat suppresses transposition activity in a hobo element containing an intact L end and only 475 bp of the R end. In addition to establishing cis-sequences requirements for transposition, we analyzed trans-sequence effects of the hobo transposase. We show a hobo transposase lacking the first 49 amino acids catalyzed hobo transposition at a higher frequency than the full-length transposase suggesting that, similar to the related Ac transposase, residues at the amino end of the transposase reduce transposition. Finally, we compared target site sequences of hobo with those of the related Hermes element and found both transposons have strong preferences for the same insertion sites.

Application of the bacteriophage Mu-driven system for the integration/amplification of target genes in the chromosomes of engineered Gram-negative bacteria--mini review

The advantages of phage Mu transposition-based systems for the chromosomal editing of plasmid-less strains are reviewed. The cis and trans requirements for Mu phage-mediated transposition, which include the L/R ends of the Mu DNA, the transposition factors MuA and MuB, and the cis/trans functioning of the E element as an enhancer, are presented. Mini-Mu(LR)/(LER) units are Mu derivatives that lack most of the Mu genes but contain the L/R ends or a properly arranged E element in cis to the L/R ends. The dual-component system, which consists of an integrative plasmid with a mini-Mu and an easily eliminated helper plasmid encoding inducible transposition factors, is described in detail as a tool for the integration/amplification of recombinant DNAs. This chromosomal editing method is based on replicative transposition through the formation of a cointegrate that can be resolved in a recombination-dependent manner. (E-plus)- or (E-minus)-helpers that differ in the presence of the trans-acting E element are used to achieve the proper mini-Mu transposition intensity. The systems that have been developed for the construction of stably maintained mini-Mu multi-integrant strains of Escherichia coli and Methylophilus methylotrophus are described. A novel integration/amplification/fixation strategy is proposed for consecutive independent replicative transpositions of different mini-Mu(LER) units with “excisable” E elements in methylotrophic cells.

Interactions of phage Mu enhancer and termini that specify the assembly of a topologically unique interwrapped transpososome

The higher-order DNA-protein complex that carries out the chemical steps of phage Mu transposition is organized by bridging interactions among three DNA sites, the left (L) and right (R) ends of Mu, and an enhancer element (E), mediated by the transposase protein MuA. A subset of the six subunits of MuA associated with their cognate sub-sites at L and R communicate with the enhancer to trigger the stepwise assembly of the functional transpososome. The DNA follows a well-defined path within the transpososome, trapping five supercoil nodes comprising two E-R crossings, one E-L crossing and two L-R crossings. The enhancer is a critical DNA element in specifying the unique interwrapped topology of the three-site LER synapse. In this study, we used multiple strategies to characterize Mu end-enhancer interactions to extend, modify and refine those inferred from earlier analyses. Directed placement of transposase subunits at their cognate sub-sites at L and R, analysis of the protein composition of transpososomes thus obtained, and their characterization using topological methods define the following interactions. R1-E interaction is essential to promote transpososome assembly, R3-E interaction contributes to the native topology of the transpososome, and L1-E and R2-E interactions are not required for assembly. The data on L2-E and L3-E interactions are not unequivocal. If they do occur, either one is sufficient to support the assembly process. Our results are consistent with two R-E and perhaps one L-E, being responsible for the three DNA crossings between the enhancer and the left and right ends of Mu. A 3D representation of the interwrapped complex (IW) obtained by modeling is consistent with these results. The model reveals straightforward geometric and topological relationships between the IW complex and a more relaxed enhancer-independent V-form of the transpososome assembled under altered reaction conditions.

3D reconstruction of the Mu transposase and the Type 1 transpososome: a structural framework for Mu DNA transposition

Mu DNA transposition proceeds through a series of higher-order nucleoprotein complexes called transpososomes. The structural core of the transpososome is a tetramer of the transposase, Mu A, bound to the two transposon ends. High-resolution structural analysis of the intact transposase and the transpososome has not been successful to date. Here we report the structure of Mu A at 16-angstroms and the Type 1 transpososome at 34-angstroms resolution, by 3D reconstruction of images obtained by scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) at cryo-temperatures. Electron spectroscopic imaging (ESI) of the DNA-phosphorus was performed in conjunction with the structural investigation to derive the path of the DNA through the transpososome and to define the DNA-binding surface in the transposase. Our model of the transpososome fits well with the accumulated biochemical literature for this intricate transposition system, and lays a structural foundation for biochemical function, including catalysis in trans and the complex circuit of macromolecular interactions underlying Mu DNA transposition.

The Mu Transposase Interwraps Distant DNA Sites within a Functional Transpososome in the Absence of DNA Supercoiling

A Mu transpososome assembled on negatively supercoiled DNA traps five supercoils by intertwining the left (L) and right (R) ends of Mu with an enhancer element (E). To investigate the contribution of DNA supercoiling to this elaborate synapse in which E and L cross once, E and R twice, and L and R twice, we have analyzed DNA crossings in a transpososome assembled on nicked substrates under conditions that bypass the supercoiling requirement for transposition. We find that the transposase MuA can recreate an essentially similar topology on nicked substrates, interwrapping both E-R and L-R twice but being unable to generate the single E-L crossing. In addition, we deduce that the functional MuA tetramer must contribute to three of the four observed crossings and, thus, to restraining the enhancer within the complex. We discuss the contribution of both MuA and DNA supercoiling to the 5-noded Mu synapse built at the 3-way junction.

IHF is the limiting host factor in transposition of Pseudomonas putida transposon Tn4652 in stationary phase

Transpositional activity of mobile elements is not constant. Conditional regulation of host factors involved in transposition may severely change the activity of mobile elements. We have demonstrated previously that transposition of Tn4652 in Pseudomonas putida is a stationary phase-specific event, which requires functional sigma S (Ilves et al., 2001, J Bacteriol 183: 5445-5448). We hypothesized that integration host factor (IHF), the concentration of which is increased in starving P. putida, might contribute to the transposition of Tn4652 as well. Here, we demonstrate that transposition of Tn4652 in stationary phase P. putida is essentially limited by the amount of IHF. No transposition of Tn4652 occurs in a P. putida ihfA-defective strain. Moreover, overexpression of IHF results in significant enhancement of transposition compared with the wild-type strain. This indicates that the amount of IHF is a bottleneck in Tn4652 transposition. Gel mobility shift and DNase I footprinting studies revealed that IHF is necessary for the binding of transposase to both transposon ends. In vitro, transposase can bind to inverted repeats of transposon only after the binding of IHF. The results obtained in this study indicate that, besides sigma S, IHF is another host factor that is implicated in the elevation of transposition in stationary phase.

The Mu three-site synapse: a strained assembly platform in which delivery of the L1 transposase binding site triggers catalytic commitment

The Mu DNA transposition reaction proceeds through a three-site synaptic complex (LER), including the two Mu ends and the transpositional enhancer. We show that the LER contains highly stressed DNA regions in the enhancer and in the L1 transposase binding site. We propose that the L1 site acts as the keystone for assembly of a catalytically competent transpososome. Delivery of L1 through HU-mediated bending completes LER assembly, provides the trigger for necessary conformational transitions in transpososome formation, and allows target capture to occur. Relief of the stress at L1 and the enhancer may help drive Mu A tetramerization and engagement of the Mu ends by the transposase active site.

Path of DNA within the Mu transpososome. Transposase interactions bridging two Mu ends and the enhancer trap five DNA supercoils

The phage Mu transpososome is assembled by interactions of transposase subunits with the left (L) and right (R) ends of Mu and an enhancer (E) located in between. A metastable three-site complex LER progresses into a more stable type 0 complex in which a tetrameric transposase is poised for DNA cleavage. "Difference topology" has revealed five trapped negative supercoils within type 0, three contributed by crossings of E with L and R, and two by crossings of L with R. This is the most complex DNA arrangement seen to date within a recombination synapse. Contrary to the prevailing notion, the enhancer appears not to be released immediately following type 0 assembly. Difference topology provides a simple method for determining the ordered sequestration of DNA segments within nucleoprotein assemblies.

Sequence and positional requirements for DNA sites in a mu transpososome

Transposition of bacteriophage Mu uses two DNA cleavage sites and six transposase recognition sites, with each recognition site divided into two half-sites. The recognition sites can activate transposition of non-Mu DNA sequences if a complete set of Mu sequences is not available. We have analyzed 18 sequences from a non-Mu DNA molecule, selected in a functional assay for the ability to be transposed by MuA transposase. These sequences are remarkably diverse. Nonetheless, when viewed as a group they resemble a Mu DNA end, with a cleavage site and a single recognition site. Analysis of these "pseudo-Mu ends" indicates that most positions in the cleavage and recognition sites contribute sequence-specific information that helps drive transposition, though only the strongest contributors are apparent from mutagenesis data. The sequence analysis also suggests variability in the alignment of recognition half-sites. Transposition assays of specifically designed DNA substrates support the conclusion that the transposition machinery is flexible enough to permit variability in half-site spacing and also perhaps variability in the placement of the recognition site with respect to the cleavage site. This variability causes only local perturbations in the protein-DNA complex, as indicated by experiments in which altered and unaltered DNA substrates are paired.

Effect of mutations in the Mu-host junction region on transpososome assembly

Mu transposition occurs through a series of higher-order nucleoprotein complexes called transpososomes. The region where the Mu DNA joins the host DNA plays an integral role in the assembly of these transpososomes. We have created a series of point mutations at the Mu-host junction and characterized their effect on the Mu in vitro strand transfer reaction. Analysis of these mutant constructs revealed an inhibition in transpososome assembly at the point in the reaction pathway when the junction region is engaged by the transposase active site (i.e. the transition from LER to type 0). We found that the degree of inhibition was dependent upon the particular base-pair change at each position and whether the substitution occurred at the left or right transposon end. The MuB transposition protein, an allosteric effector of MuA, was shown to suppress all of the inhibitory Mu-host junction mutants. Most of the mutant constructs were also suppressed, to varying degrees, by the substitution of Mg(2+) with Mn(2+). Analysis of the mutant constructs has revealed hierarchical nucleotide preferences at positions -1 through +3 for transpososome assembly and suggests the possibility that specific metal ion-DNA base interactions are involved in DNA recognition and transpososome assembly.

The Mu enhancer is functionally asymmetric both in cis and in trans. Topological selectivity of Mu transposition is enhancer-independent

Mu DNA transposition from a negatively supercoiled DNA substrate requires interaction of an enhancer element with the left (attL) and right (attR) ends of Mu. The orientation of the L and R ends with respect to each other (inverted) and with respect to the enhancer is normally inviolate. We show that when the enhancer is provided in trans as a linear fragment, the head to head orientation of the L/R ends is still required. Each functional half of the linear enhancer maintains the same "cross-wise" interaction with the subsites L1 and R1, when present in cis or in trans. In reactions catalyzed by an enhancer-independent variant of the Mu transposase, the need for negative supercoiling of the substrate and the inverted orientation of L and R ends is not relaxed. These results show that the orientation specificity of the enhancer is not determined by its topological linkage to the Mu ends. There is a functional asymmetry inherent to the enhancer. Furthermore, the enhancer does not directly impose topological constraints on the transposition reaction or specify the reactive orientation of the Mu ends.

1999 Roche Diagnostics Prize for Biomolecular and Cellular Research / Prix Roche Diagnostics 1999 pour la recherche en biologie moléculaire et cellulaireStudies on a "jumping gene machine": Higher-order nucleoprotein complexes in Mu DNA transposition

Studies in my lab have focused on DNA transposition in the bacterial virus, Mu. In vitro studies have shown that Mu DNA transposition is a three-step process involving DNA breakage, strand transfer and DNA replication. In the first step, a nick is introduced at each end of the transposon. The liberated 3'-OH groups subsequently attack a target DNA molecule resulting in strand transfer. The transposon DNA, now covalently linked to the target, is finally replicated to generate the transposition end-product, referred to as a cointegrate. The DNA cleavage and strand transfer reactions are mediated by a "jumping gene machine" or transpososomes, which we discovered in 1987. They are assembled by bringing together three different DNA regions via a process involving multiple protein-DNA and protein-protein interactions. The action of four different proteins is required in addition to protein-induced DNA bending or wrapping to overcome the intrinsic stiffness of DNA, which would ordinarily prohibit the assembly of such a structure. Transpososome assembly is a gradual process involving multiple steps with an inherent flexibility whereby alternate pathways can be used in the assembly process, biasing the reaction towards completion under different conditions.Key words: DNA transposition, transposons, higher-order nucleoprotein complexes, DNA breakage and reunion, site-specific recombination.

Regulation of the transposase of Tn4652 by the transposon-encoded protein TnpC

Transposition is a DNA reorganization reaction potentially deleterious for the host. The frequency of transposition is limited by the amount of transposase. Therefore, strict regulation of a transposase is required to keep control over the destructive multiplication of the mobile element. We have shown previously that the expression of the transposase (tnpA) of the Pseudomonas putida PaW85 transposon Tn4652 is positively affected by integration host factor. Here, we present evidence that the amount of the transposase of Tn4652 in P. putida cells is controlled by the transposon-encoded protein (TnpC). Sequence analysis of the 120-amino-acid-long TnpC, coded just downstream of the tnpA gene, showed that it has remarkable similarity to the putative polypeptide encoded by the mercury resistance transposon Tn5041. As determined by quantitative Western blot analysis, the abundance of TnpA was reduced up to 10-fold in the intact tnpC background. In vivo experiments using transcriptional and translational fusions of the tnpA gene and the reporter gene gusA indicated that TnpC operates in the regulation of the transposase of Tn4652 at the post-transcriptional level.

Phage Mu transposition immunity reflects supercoil domain structure of the chromosome

Transposition immunity is the negative influence that the presence of one transposon sequence has on the probability of a second identical element inserting in the same site or in sites nearby. A transposition-defective Mu derivative (MudJr1) produced transposition immunity in both directions from one insertion point in the Salmonella typhimurium chromosome. To control for the sequence preference of Mu transposition proteins, Tn10 elements were introduced as targets at various distances from an immunity-conferring MudJr1 element. Mu transposition into a Tn10 target was not detectable when the distance of separation from MudJr1 was 5 kb, and transposition was unencumbered when the separation was 25 kb. Between 5 kb and 25 kb, immunity decayed gradually with distance. Immunity decayed more sharply in a gyrase mutant than in a wild-type strain. We propose that Mu transposition immunity senses the domain structure of bacterial chromosomes.

Expression of the transposase gene tnpA of Tn4652 is positively affected by integration host factor

Tn4652 is a derivative of the toluene degradation transposon Tn4651 that belongs to the Tn3 family of transposons (M. Tsuda and T. Iino, Mol. Gen. Genet. 210:270-276, 1987). We have sequenced the transposase gene tnpA of transposon Tn4652 and mapped its promoter to the right end of the element. The deduced amino acid sequence of tnpA revealed 96.2% identity with the putative transposase of Tn5041. Homology with other Tn3 family transposases was only moderate (about 20 to 24% identity), suggesting that Tn4652 and Tn5041 are distantly related members of the Tn3 family. Functional analysis of the tnpA promoter revealed that it is active in Pseudomonas putida but silent in Escherichia coli, indicating that some P. putida-specific factor is required for the transcription from this promoter. Additionally, tnpA promoter activity was shown to be modulated by integration host factor (IHF). The presence of an IHF-binding site upstream of the tnpA promoter enhanced the promoter activity. The positive role of IHF was also confirmed by the finding that the enhancing effect of IHF was not detected in the P. putida ihfA-deficient strain A8759. Moreover, the Tn4652 terminal sequences had a negative effect on transcription from the tnpA promoter in the ihfA-defective strain. This finding suggests that IHF not only enhances transcription from the tnpA promoter but also alleviates the negative effect of terminal sequences of Tn4652 on the promoter activity. Also, an in vitro binding assay demonstrated that both ends of Tn4652 bind IHF from a cell lysate of E. coli.

Disruption of target DNA binding in Mu DNA transposition by alteration of position 99 in the Mu B protein

Target DNA binding by the Mu B protein is an important step in phage Mu transposition; however, the region of Mu B involved in target binding and the mechanism of the interaction are unknown. Previous studies have demonstrated that modification of Mu B with the sulfhydryl-specific reagent N-ethylmaleimide can selectively inhibit target DNA binding. We now show that individual mutation of the three cysteines in Mu B to serine results in proteins which are active in intermolecular strand transfer, but demonstrate variable levels of N-ethylmaleimide resistance. The data indicate that cysteine 99 is the primary site of modification affecting target DNA binding, with a minor contribution resulting from the derivatization of cysteine 129. These findings are confirmed by the construction of Mu B mutants containing a bulky side-chain at the individual cysteine to mimic the N-ethylmaleimide modified protein. The C99Y protein shows a complete loss in target-dependent strand transfer activity under standard reaction conditions and C129Y displays partial activity. The effect of the tyrosine substitutions is specific for target interaction as both mutants show wild-type activity in their ability to stimulate the Mu transposase to perform donor cleavage and intramolecular strand transfer. Finally, a target dissociation assay has shown that the C99Y-DNA complex generated in the presence of ATP-gamma-S has a drastically reduced half-life as previously found for N-ethylmaleimide treated wild-type Mu B. Modification of cysteine 99 is proposed to block target DNA binding by causing steric interference near the DNA binding pocket.

The Mu transposase tetramer is inactive in unassisted strand transfer: an auto-allosteric effect of Mu A promotes the reaction in the absence of Mu B

A tetramer of the Mu transposase is the structural and functional core in all three stable higher-order nucleoprotein complexes (Type 0, Type 1 and Type 2 transpososomes) generated in a defined in vitro strand transfer reaction. Although functional in donor cleavage, we report here that contrary to previous belief, the Mu A tetramer is incapable of unassisted strand transfer. The Mu B protein is required to stimulate the tetramer for intermolecular strand transfer. In the absence of Mu B protein we show that additional Mu A molecules must be added to the core tetramer to stimulate intramolecular strand transfer. Mapping experiments indicate that domain II of the assisting Mu A mediates functional interactions with the core tetramer. The recipient site for Mu A stimulated strand transfer on the A tetramer is likely in domain II and is clearly different from the domain IIIb site used by the Mu B protein. The Mu accessory end binding sites and the Mu enhancer are not required in the Mu A assisted strand transfer, suggesting that helper A molecules in solution can interact with the core tetramer to stimulate the reaction. Finally, we argue that the strand transfer activity and protein sites for target interaction reside within the core tetramer; hence the role of the stimulatory A molecules appears to be limited to that of an auto-allosteric effector.

Three-site synapsis during Mu DNA transposition: a critical intermediate preceding engagement of the active site

The chemical steps of bacteriophage Mu DNA transposition take place within a higher order nucleoprotein structure. We describe a novel intermediate that precedes the previously characterized transpososomes and directly demonstrates the interaction of a distant enhancer element with recombination regions. The transpositional enhancer interacts with the Mu left and right ends to form a three-site synaptic (LER) complex. Under normal reaction conditions, the LER complex is rapidly converted into the more stable Mu transpososomes. However, mutation of the Mu terminal nucleotides results in accumulation of the LER and a failure to form the type 0 transpososome. During the transition from LER to type 0, the Mu DNA termini and the active site of the transposase engage in a catalytically competent conformation.

The interwoven architecture of the Mu transposase couples DNA synapsis to catalysis

Mu transposition occurs exclusively using a pair of recombination sites found at the ends of the phage genome. To address the mechanistic basis of this specificity, we have determined both where the individual subunits of the tetrameric transposase bind on the DNA and where they catalyze DNA joining. We demonstrate that subunits do not catalyze recombination at the site adjacent to where they are bound, but rather on the opposite end of the phage genome. Furthermore, subunits bound to two different sites contribute to catalysis of one reaction step. This interwoven subunit arrangement suggests a molecular explanation for the precision with which recombination occurs using a pair of DNA signals and provides an example of the way in which the architecture of a protein-DNA complex can define the reaction products.

Assembly of phage Mu transpososomes: cooperative transitions assisted by protein and DNA scaffolds

Transposition of phage Mu takes place within higher order protein-DNA complexes called transpososomes. These complexes contain the two Mu genome ends synapsed by a tetramer of Mu transposase (MuA). Transpososome assembly is tightly controlled by multiple protein and DNA sequence cofactors. We find that assembly can occur through two distinct pathways. One previously described pathway depends on an enhancer-like sequence element, the internal activation sequence (IAS). The second pathway depends on a MuB protein-target DNA complex. For both pathways, all four MuA monomers in the tetramer need to interact with an assembly-assisting element, either the IAS or MuB. However, once assembled, not all MuA monomers within the transpososome need to interact with MuB to capture MuB-bound target DNA. The multiple layers of control likely are used in vivo to ensure efficient rounds of DNA replication when needed, while minimizing unwanted transposition products.

Protein-DNA assemblies controlling lytic development of bacteriophage Mu

Recent analysis of the mechanism and regulation of transposition by bacteriophage Mu has emphasized the importance of controlled assembly of specific protein-DNA complexes. Both the Mu transposase and the Mu repressor engage in multiple protein-protein and protein-DNA interactions that modulate the outcome of a phage infection.

Mechanistic aspects of DNA transposition

The past year has seen a number of important advances in our understanding of the mechanisms of DNA transposition. The molecular details of the protein-protein, protein-DNA and chemical-reaction steps in several transposition systems have been revealed and have highlighted remarkable uniformity in some areas, ranging from bacterial to retroviral mechanisms.