Preparation of a stable fresh frozen primary lipoprotein[a] (Lp[a]) standard

High Lipoprotein(a) May Explain One-Quarter of Clinical Familial Hypercholesterolemia Diagnoses in Danish Lipid Clinics

CONTEXT

Cholesterol carried in lipoprotein(a) adds to measured low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and may therefore drive some diagnoses of clinical familial hypercholesterolemia (FH).

OBJECTIVE

We investigated plasma lipoprotein(a) in individuals referred to Danish lipid clinics and evaluated the effect of plasma lipoprotein(a) on a diagnosis of FH.

METHODS

Individuals referred to 15 Danish lipid clinics who were suspected of having FH according to nationwide referral criteria were recruited between September 1, 2020 and November 30, 2021. All individuals were classified according to the Dutch Lipid Clinical Network criteria for FH before and after LDL-C was adjusted for 30% cholesterol content in lipoprotein(a). We calculated the fraction of individuals fulfilling a clinical diagnosis of FH partly due to elevated lipoprotein(a).

RESULTS

We included a total of 1166 individuals for analysis, of whom 206 fulfilled a clinical diagnosis of FH. Median lipoprotein(a) was 15 mg/dL (29 nmol/L) in those referred and 28% had lipoprotein(a) greater than or equal to 50 mg/dL (105 nmol/L), while 2% had levels greater than or equal to 180 mg/dL (389 nmol/L). We found that in 27% (55/206) of those fulfilling a clinical diagnosis of FH, this was partly due to high lipoprotein(a).

CONCLUSION

Elevated lipoprotein(a) was common in individuals referred to Danish lipid clinics and in one-quarter of individuals who fulfilled a clinical diagnosis of FH, this was partly due to elevated lipoprotein(a). These findings support the notion that the LPA gene should be considered an important causative gene in patients with clinical FH and further support the importance of measuring lipoprotein(a) when diagnosing FH as well as for stratification of cardiovascular risk.

Frequent questions and responses on the 2022 lipoprotein(a) consensus statement of the European Atherosclerosis Society

In 2022, the European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) published a new consensus statement on lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], summarizing current knowledge about its causal association with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and aortic stenosis. One of the novelties of this statement is a new risk calculator showing how Lp(a) influences lifetime risk for ASCVD and that global risk may be underestimated substantially in individuals with high or very high Lp(a) concentration. The statement also provides practical advice on how knowledge about Lp(a) concentration can be used to modulate risk factor management, given that specific and highly effective mRNA-targeted Lp(a)-lowering therapies are still in clinical development. This advice counters the attitude: "Why should I measure Lp(a) if I can't lower it?". Subsequent to publication, questions have arisen relating to how the recommendations of this statement impact everyday clinical practice and ASCVD management. This review addresses 30 of the most frequently asked questions about Lp(a) epidemiology, its contribution to cardiovascular risk, Lp(a) measurement, risk factor management and existing therapeutic options.

Lipoprotein(a) in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and aortic stenosis: a European Atherosclerosis Society consensus statement

This 2022 European Atherosclerosis Society lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] consensus statement updates evidence for the role of Lp(a) in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and aortic valve stenosis, provides clinical guidance for testing and treating elevated Lp(a) levels, and considers its inclusion in global risk estimation. Epidemiologic and genetic studies involving hundreds of thousands of individuals strongly support a causal and continuous association between Lp(a) concentration and cardiovascular outcomes in different ethnicities; elevated Lp(a) is a risk factor even at very low levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. High Lp(a) is associated with both microcalcification and macrocalcification of the aortic valve. Current findings do not support Lp(a) as a risk factor for venous thrombotic events and impaired fibrinolysis. Very low Lp(a) levels may associate with increased risk of diabetes mellitus meriting further study. Lp(a) has pro-inflammatory and pro-atherosclerotic properties, which may partly relate to the oxidized phospholipids carried by Lp(a). This panel recommends testing Lp(a) concentration at least once in adults; cascade testing has potential value in familial hypercholesterolaemia, or with family or personal history of (very) high Lp(a) or premature ASCVD. Without specific Lp(a)-lowering therapies, early intensive risk factor management is recommended, targeted according to global cardiovascular risk and Lp(a) level. Lipoprotein apheresis is an option for very high Lp(a) with progressive cardiovascular disease despite optimal management of risk factors. In conclusion, this statement reinforces evidence for Lp(a) as a causal risk factor for cardiovascular outcomes. Trials of specific Lp(a)-lowering treatments are critical to confirm clinical benefit for cardiovascular disease and aortic valve stenosis.

Canadian Society of Clinical Chemists Harmonized Clinical Laboratory Lipid Reporting Recommendations on the Basis of the 2021 Canadian Cardiovascular Society Lipid Guidelines

There is limited guidance on laboratory reporting and interpretation of lipids and lipoproteins used in cardiovascular risk stratification. This contributes to inconsistencies in lipid reporting across clinical laboratories. Recently, the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) published the 2021 CCS guidelines for the management of dyslipidemia for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in the adult. A subcommittee of the Working Group on Reference Interval Harmonization of the Canadian Society of Clinical Chemists has developed harmonized lipid reporting recommendations that are aligned with the 2021 CCS guidelines, to improve the standardization of lipid assessment and clinical decision-making. The proposed harmonized lipid reporting recommendations were critically reviewed by a broad range of laboratory and clinical experts across Canada. Feedback from approximately 30 expert reviewers was reviewed by the Working Group on Reference Interval Harmonization lipid subcommittee, and consensus decisions were incorporated into the 2021 harmonized lipid reporting recommendations. In this position statement, we provide 6 recommendations for laboratory reporting of lipid parameters. These recommendations include implementing the new National Institutes of Health equation to replace the Friedewald equation for calculating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, offering lipoprotein (a), either as an in-house or send-out test, and using assays that report lipoprotein (a) in molar units (nmol/L). We also developed a harmonized lipid reporting format with interpretive comments that includes flagging results based on screening patients using treatment decision thresholds in a primary prevention setting. Overall, harmonized lipid reporting will help bridge the gap between clinical guideline recommendations and clinical laboratory reporting and interpretation, and will improve cardiovascular risk assessment across Canada.

Lipoprotein(a) measurement issues: Are we making a mountain out of a molehill?

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] became besides LDL cholesterol one of the most attractive targets for intervention in cardiovascular disease. Strong genetic evidence supports the causal association between high Lp(a) concentrations and cardiovascular outcomes. Since specific Lp(a)-lowering therapies are under clinical investigation, the interest in measuring Lp(a) has markedly increased. However, the special structure of the lead protein component of Lp(a), named apolipoprotein(a), creates difficulties for an accurate measurement of Lp(a). A highly homologous repetitive structure, called kringle IV repeat with up to more the 40 repeats, causes a highly polymorphic protein. Antibodies raised against apolipoprotein(a) are mostly directed against the repetitive structure of this protein, which complicates the measurement of Lp(a) in molar terms. Both measurements in mass (mg/dL) and molar terms (nmol/L) are described and a conversion from one into the another unit is only approximately possible. Working groups for standardization of Lp(a) measurements are going to prepare widely available and improved reference materials, which will be a major step for the measurement of Lp(a). This review discusses many aspects of the difficulties in measuring Lp(a). It tries to distinguish between academic and practical concerns and warns to make a mountain out of a molehill, which does no longer allow to see the patient behind that mountain by simply staring at the laboratory issues. On the other hand, the calibration of some assays raises major concerns, which are anything else but a molehill. This should be kept in mind and we should start measuring Lp(a) with the aim of a better risk stratification for the patient and to identify those patients who might be in urgent need for a specific Lp(a)-lowering therapy as soon as it becomes available.

Lipoprotein (a): An Update on a Marker of Residual Risk and Associated Clinical Manifestations

Lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] is a low-density, cholesterol-containing lipoprotein that differs from other low-density lipoproteins due to the presence of apolipoprotein(a) bound to its surface apolipoprotein B100. Multiple epidemiologic studies, including Mendelian Randomization studies, have demonstrated that increasing Lp(a) levels are associated with increased risk of heart disease, including atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and calcific aortic stenosis. The risk associated with elevations in Lp(a) appears to be independent of other lipid markers. While the current treatment options for elevated Lp(a) are limited, promising new therapies are under development, leading to renewed interest in Lp(a). This review provides an overview of the biology and epidemiology of Lp(a), available outcome studies, and insights into future therapies.

In vivo stable-isotope kinetic study suggests intracellular assembly of lipoprotein(a)

OBJECTIVE

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] consists of apolipoprotein B-100 (apoB-100) as part of an LDL-like particle and the covalently linked glycoprotein apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)]. Detailed mechanisms of its biosynthesis, assembly, secretion and catabolism are still poorly understood. To address the Lp(a) assembly mechanism, we studied the in vivo kinetics of apo(a) and apoB-100 from Lp(a) and LDL apoB-100 in nine healthy probands using stable-isotope methodology.

METHODS

The level of isotope enrichment was used to calculate the fractional synthesis rate (FSR), production rate (PR) and retention time (RT) using SAAMII software and multicompartmental modeling.

RESULTS

We observed a similar mean PR for apo(a) (1.15 nmol/kg/d) and apoB-100 (1.31 nmol/kg/d) from Lp(a), which differed significantly from the PR for apoB-100 from LDL (32.6 nmol/kg/d). Accordingly, mean FSR and RT values for Lp(a)-apo(a) were similar to those of Lp(a)-apoB and different from those for LDL-apoB.

CONCLUSION

Two different kinetic apoB pools within Lp(a) and LDL suggest intracellular Lp(a) assembly from apo(a) and newly synthesized LDL.

Nicotinic acid inhibits hepatic APOA gene expression: studies in humans and in transgenic mice

Elevated plasma lipoprotein(a) (LPA) levels are recognized as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. Our knowledge on LPA metabolism is incomplete, which makes it difficult to develop LPA-lowering medications. Nicotinic acid (NA) is the main drug recommended for the treatment of patients with increased plasma LPA concentrations. The mechanism of NA in lowering LPA is virtually unknown. To study this mechanism, we treated transgenic (tg) APOA mice with NA and measured plasma APOA and hepatic mRNA levels. In addition, mouse and human primary hepatocytes were incubated with NA, and the expression of APOA was followed. Feeding 1% NA reduced plasma APOA and hepatic expression of APOA in tg-APOA mice. Experiments with cultured human and mouse primary hepatocytes in addition to reporter assays performed in HepG2 cells revealed that NA suppresses APOA transcription. The region between -1446 and -857 of the human APOA promoter harboring several cAMP response element binding sites conferred the negative effect of NA. In accordance, cAMP stimulated APOA transcription, and NA reduced hepatic cAMP levels. It is suggested that cAMP signaling might be involved in reducing APOA transcription, which leads to the lowering of plasma LPA.

Farnesoid X receptor represses hepatic human APOA gene expression

High plasma concentrations of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a), which is encoded by the APOA gene] increase an individual's risk of developing diseases, such as coronary artery diseases, restenosis, and stroke. Unfortunately, increased Lp(a) levels are minimally influenced by dietary changes or drug treatment. Further, the development of Lp(a)-specific medications has been hampered by limited knowledge of Lp(a) metabolism. In this study, we identified patients suffering from biliary obstructions with very low plasma Lp(a) concentrations that rise substantially after surgical intervention. Consistent with this, common bile duct ligation in mice transgenic for human APOA (tg-APOA mice) lowered plasma concentrations and hepatic expression of APOA. To test whether farnesoid X receptor (FXR), which is activated by bile acids, was responsible for the low plasma Lp(a) levels in cholestatic patients and mice, we treated tg-APOA and tg-APOA/Fxr-/- mice with cholic acid. FXR activation markedly reduced plasma concentrations and hepatic expression of human APOA in tg-APOA mice but not in tg-APOA/Fxr-/- mice. Incubation of primary hepatocytes from tg-APOA mice with bile acids dose dependently downregulated APOA expression. Further analysis determined that the direct repeat 1 element between nucleotides -826 and -814 of the APOA promoter functioned as a negative FXR response element. This motif is also bound by hepatocyte nuclear factor 4α (HNF4α), which promotes APOA transcription, and FXR was shown to compete with HNF4α for binding to this motif. These findings may have important implications in the development of Lp(a)-lowering medications.

Analysis of cholesterol levels in lipoprotein(a) with anion-exchange chromatography

We previously established an analysis method for determining the cholesterol levels of five major lipoprotein classes [HDL, LDL, intermediate density lipoprotein (IDL), VLDL, and chylomicrons] in serum by an anion-exchange (AEX)-HPLC method, but lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], a well-known risk factor for atherosclerotic diseases, was not determinable. Therefore, we established new AEX-HPLC separation conditions for analyzing the cholesterol levels of six lipoprotein classes, including Lp(a). Serum lipoproteins were separated by HPLC with a diethylaminoethyl-ligand nonporous polymer-based column by elution with a stepwise gradient of the sodium perchlorate concentration. In this improved method, HDL, LDL, IDL, VLDL, chylomicrons, and Lp(a) were each eluted from the column. The cholesterol levels of the eluted lipoproteins were measured enzymatically by a postcolumn reaction. The within-day assay and between-day assay coefficients of variation for the lipoprotein cholesterol levels were in the ranges of 0.29-11.86% and 0.57-11.99%, respectively. The Lp(a) cholesterol levels determined by AEX-HPLC were significantly correlated with the amounts of Lp(a) protein measured by an immunoturbidimetry method available commercially (r = 0.9503, P < 0.0001). Taken together, this AEX-HPLC method may be effectively applied to the analysis of serum lipoproteins with high levels of Lp(a).

Impact of elevated serum lipoprotein (a) concentrations on the risk of coronary heart disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is associated with a marked increase of coronary heart disease (CHD). We aimed to assess the impact of elevated serum lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) concentrations on the risk of CHD in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. A consecutive series of 352 outpatients was investigated. We determined the serum lipid profile and checked the patients for a history of CHD and of its traditional risk factors. Furthermore, the patients were divided into 3 groups according to the degree of elevation of the serum Lp(a) concentration: serum Lp(a) concentrations greater than 50 mg/dL, between 30 and 50 mg/dL, and less than 30 mg/dL, a presumed high normal value; and the prevalence of CHD was compared among the 3 groups. The serum Lp(a) concentrations in the subjects varied widely from 0.4 to 163.6 mg/dL. Patients with CHD had significantly higher serum Lp(a) concentrations than those without CHD (P = .0045). Logistic regression analysis to identify factors associated with the presence of CHD revealed that elevated serum Lp(a) is a significant risk factor (P = .0246). The prevalence of CHD increased with increasing serum Lp(a) concentrations (P = .048). Patients with serum Lp(a) concentrations greater than 50 mg/dL had a significantly higher prevalence of CHD than those with serum Lp(a) concentrations less than 30 mg/dL: the odds ratio of an elevated serum Lp(a) concentration was 3.346 (P = .039). In conclusion, elevated serum Lp(a) is a significant risk factor; and the risk of CHD appears to increase with increasing serum Lp(a) concentrations. Serum Lp(a) concentration of 50 mg/dL might represent a threshold level in relation to the risk of CHD in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

In vivo turnover study demonstrates diminished clearance of lipoprotein(a) in hemodialysis patients

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) consists of a low-density lipoprotein-like particle and a covalently linked highly glycosylated protein, called apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)). Lp(a) derives from the liver but its catabolism is still poorly understood. Plasma concentrations of this highly atherogenic lipoprotein are elevated in hemodialysis (HD) patients, suggesting the kidney to be involved in Lp(a) catabolism. We therefore compared the in vivo turnover rates of both protein components from Lp(a) (i.e. apo(a) and apoB) determined by stable-isotope technology in seven HD patients with those of nine healthy controls. The fractional catabolic rate (FCR) of Lp(a)-apo(a) was significantly lower in HD patients compared with controls (0.164+/-0.114 vs 0.246+/-0.067 days(-1), P=0.042). The same was true for the FCR of Lp(a)-apoB (0.129+/-0.097 vs 0.299+/-0.142 days(-1), P=0.005). This resulted in a much longer residence time of 8.9 days for Lp(a)-apo(a) and 12.9 days for Lp(a)-apoB in HD patients compared with controls (4.4 and 3.9 days, respectively). The production rates of apo(a) and apoB from Lp(a) did not differ significantly between patients and controls and were even lower for patients when compared with controls with similar Lp(a) plasma concentrations. This in vivo turnover study is a further crucial step in understanding the mechanism of Lp(a) catabolism: the loss of renal function in HD patients causes elevated Lp(a) plasma levels because of decreased clearance but not increased production of Lp(a). The prolonged retention time of Lp(a) in HD patients might importantly contribute to the high risk of atherosclerosis in these patients.

Electroelution of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] from native polyacrylamide gels: A new, simple method to purify Lp(a)

Lipoprotein(a), Lp(a), is an atherogenic lipoprotein consisting of an LDL like core particle and a covalently linked glycoprotein of variable size. Lp(a), isolated from serum always contains LDL and HDL(2) as contaminants since Lp(a) floats in the density range 1.05-1.12 g/ml which overlaps that of LDL and HDL(2). Purified Lp(a) is increasingly needed as a standard to overcome various problems in the standardization of Lp(a) measurements and for in vitro biological studies. Problems inherent to the purification of Lp(a) include the aggregation of Lp(a) with LDL, overlapping size distribution and the inability of some fractions to bind to affinity columns. Here, we describe the development of a new method to purify Lp(a) from contaminating LDL and HDL(2) particles. Lp(a) was isolated from serum by sequential ultracentrifugation, resolved by native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and the gel segments were electroeluted to obtain pure Lp(a). l-Proline was added to the sample to a final concentration of 0.1 M to prevent the aggregation of Lp(a) with LDL.

A new type of non-Ca2+-buffering Apo(a)-based fluorescent indicator for intraluminal Ca2+ in the endoplasmic reticulum

Genetically encoded Ca2+ indicators are outstanding tools for the assessment of intracellular/organelle Ca2+ dynamics. Basically, most indicators contain the Ca2+-binding site of a (mutated) cytosolic protein that interacts with its natural (mutated) interaction partner upon binding of Ca2+. Consequently, a change in the structure of the sensor occurs that, in turn, alters the fluorescent properties of the sensor. Herein, we present a new type of genetically encoded Ca2+ indicator for the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) (apoK1-er (W. F. Graier, K. Osibow, R. Malli, and G. M. Kostner, patent application number 05450006.1 at the European patent office)) that is based on a single kringle domain from apolipoprotein(a), which is flanked by yellow and cyan fluorescent protein at the 3'- and 5'-ends, respectively. Notably, apoK1-er does not interact with Ca2+ itself but serves as a substrate for calreticulin, the main constitutive Ca2+-binding protein in the ER. ApoK1-er assembles with calreticulin and the protein disulfide isomerase ERp57 and undergoes a conformational shift in a Ca2+-dependent manner that allows fluorescence resonance energy transfer between the two fluorophores. This construct primarily offers three major advantages compared with the already existing probes: (i) it resolves perfectly the physiological range of the free Ca2+ concentration in the ER, (ii) expression of apoK1-er does not affect the Ca2+ buffering capacity of the ER, and (iii) apoK1-er is not inactivated by binding of constitutive interaction partners that prevent Ca2+-dependent conformational changes. These unique characteristics of apoK1-er make this sensor particularly attractive for studies on ER Ca2+ signaling and dynamics in which alteration of Ca2+ fluctuations by expression of any additional Ca2+ buffer essentially has to be avoided.

Quo vadis haemapheresis. Current developments in haemapheresis

The techniques of haemapheresis originated in the development of centrifugal devices separating cells from plasma and later on plasma from cells. Subsequently membrane filtration was developed allowing for plasma-cell separation. The unspecificity of therapeutic plasma exchange led to the development of secondary plasma separation technologies being specific, semi-selective or selective such as adsorption, filtration or precipitation. In contrast on-line differential separation of cells is still under development. Whereas erythrocytapheresis, granulocytapheresis, lymphocytapheresis and stem cell apheresis are technically advanced, monocytapheresis may need further improvement. Also, indications such as erythrocytapheresis for the treatment of polycythaemia vera or photopheresis though being clinically effective and of considerable importance for an appropriate disease control are to some extent under debate as being either too costly or without sufficient understanding of the mechanism. Other forms of cell therapy are under development. Rheohaemapheresis as the most advanced technology of extracorporeal haemorheotherapy is a rapidly developing approach contributing to the treatment of microcirculatory diseases and tissue repair. Whereas the control of a considerable number of (auto-) antibody mediated diseases is beyond discussion, the indication of apheresis therapy for immune complex mediated diseases is quite often still under debate. Detoxification for artificial liver support advanced considerably during the last years, whereas conclusions on the efficacy of septicaemia treatment are debatable indeed. LDL-apheresis initiated in 1981 as immune apheresis is well established since 24 years, other semi-selective or unspecific procedures, allowing for the elimination of LDL-cholesterol among other plasma components are also being used. Correspondingly Lp(a) apheresis is available as a specific, highly efficient elimination procedure superior to techniques which also eliminate Lp(a). Quality control systems, more economical technologies as for instance by increasing automation, influencing the over-interpretation of evidence based medicine especially in patients with rare diseases without treatment alternative, more insight into the need of controlled clinical trials or alternatively improved diagnostic procedures are among others tools ways to expand the application of haemapheresis so far applied in cardiology, dermatology, haematology, immunology, nephrology, neurology, ophthalmology, otology, paediatrics, rheumatology, surgery and transfusion medicine.

Familial lecithin-cholesterol acyltransferase deficiency: biochemical characteristics and molecular analysis of a new LCAT mutation in a Polish family

Familial LCAT deficiency (FLD) is a rare genetic disorder associated with corneal opacities, anaemia and proteinuria with renal failure. Here we report detailed analyses on plasma lipids, lipoproteins, and the molecular defect in two siblings from a Polish family presenting classical symptoms of FLD and their family members with newly discovered Val309Met mutation in exon 6 of LCAT gene. Both patients displayed low total (2.19 and 2.94 mmol/l) and HDL-cholesterol concentrations (0.52 and 0.48 mmol/l), low percentage of cholesteryl esters (CE) (11.1 and 12%), and decreased apo AI and apo AII serum levels. Low LDL-cholesterol, apo B and Lp(a) levels, and increased oleate/linoleate ratios in CE could be of importance in the development of atherosclerosis in these patients with low HDL-cholesterol. LCAT activity was 10% of normal, alpha-LCAT activity was 0, and LCAT concentration was undetectable by immunoassay. Plasma CETP activity was at lower limits of normal. PCR and sequence analysis of DNA from the proband and affected brother revealed a novel G-->A mutation in exon 6 of LCAT gene, which resulted in an amino acid substitution of valine for methionine (Val309Met). The proband and affected brother were both homozygous carriers, while the mother, siblings and children of patients were heterozygous carriers of a newly discovered mutation. This is the first LCAT mutation described in the Slavic population.

Dyslipidemia and nephrotic syndrome: Recent advances

Patients with nephrotic syndrome (NS) have one of the most pronounced secondary changes in lipoprotein metabolism known, and the magnitude of the changes correlates with the severity of the disease. These changes are of a quantitative as well as a qualitative nature. All apolipoprotein B (apo B)-containing lipoproteins, such as very-low-density lipoproteins (VLDL), intermediate-density lipoproteins (IDL), low-density lipoproteins (LDL), and lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], are elevated in nephrotic syndrome. High-density lipoproteins (HDL) are reported to be unchanged or reduced. In addition to these quantitative changes, the lipoprotein composition is markedly changed, with a higher ratio of cholesterol to triglycerides in the apo B-containing lipoproteins and an increase in the proportion of cholesterol, cholesterol ester, and phospholipids compared with proteins. Also apolipoproteins show major changes, with an increase in apolipoprotein A-I, A-IV, B, C, and E. Particularly the changes in apo C-II, which is an activator of the enzyme lipoprotein lipase (LPL), and apo C-III, an inhibitor of LPL, with an increase of the C-III to C-II ratio, might contribute to the impaired lipoprotein catabolism in NS. The mechanisms for these changes in lipoprotein metabolism are discussed in this review as far as they are known. Furthermore, the tremendous elevations of Lp(a) in nephrotic syndrome and its primary and secondary causes are reviewed. Primary causes became recently apparent by a significantly higher frequency of low-molecular-weight apo(a) phenotypes in patients compared with controls. The secondary causes were shown by an increase of Lp(a) in all apo(a) isoform groups. Because Lp(a) is an LDL-like particle that is usually included in the measured or calculated LDL cholesterol fraction, the influence of the extremely high Lp(a) levels in NS on the measurement of LDL cholesterol is discussed.

Lipoprotein(a)- and low-density lipoprotein-derived cholesterol in nephrotic syndrome: Impact on lipid-lowering therapy?

BACKGROUND

Patients with nephrotic syndrome have the highest lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] concentrations known. Lp(a) is an low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-like particle consisting of 45% cholesterol. The usual methods to determine LDL cholesterol do not distinguish between cholesterol derived from LDL and Lp(a) and are thus the net result of cholesterol levels from both lipoproteins. High Lp(a) concentrations therefore significantly contribute to the measured or calculated LDL cholesterol levels. Since statins have no influence on Lp(a) levels, it can be expected that the LDL cholesterol-lowering effect of statins may be diminished in patients who have a pronounced elevation of Lp(a) levels accompanied by only moderate elevations of LDL cholesterol.

METHODS

We investigated 207 patients with nondiabetic nephrotic syndrome in whom Lp(a) concentrations were strikingly elevated when compared to 274 controls (60.4 +/- 85.4 mg/dL vs. 20.0 +/- 32.8 mg/dL, P < 0.0001).

RESULTS

According to National Kidney Foundation Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative (K/DOQI) Clinical Practice Guidelines for Managing Dyslipidemias, almost 95% of these patients are candidates for a therapeutic intervention to lower LDL cholesterol. LDL cholesterol levels corrected for Lp(a)-derived cholesterol, however, were 27 mg/dL lower than uncorrected concentrations (compared to only 9 mg/dL in controls). If Lp(a)-corrected levels instead of total LDL cholesterol levels were used, 25.7% of patients with low-molecular-weight (LMW) apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] isoforms were classified no longer to be in need of LDL cholesterol-lowering therapeutic intervention compared to only 2.3% of patients with high-molecular-weight (HMW) apo(a) phenotypes (P < 0.00001). This ("pseudo") pharmacogenetic effect results in incorrect determination of LDL cholesterol.

CONCLUSION

Our observation has an impact on the indication for, and assessment of efficacy of intervention. This potential artifact should be investigated in ongoing large trials in renal patients as well as in nonrenal African American subjects who have on average markedly higher Lp(a) levels. In nonrenal Caucasian subjects with much lower Lp(a) concentrations, this issue will be less relevant.

Epidemiology, pathophysiology and therapeutic implications of lipoprotein(a) in kidney disease

Chronic kidney disease is associated with a tremendously increased risk for cardiovascular disease. Traditional risk factors for cardiovascular disease, however, show a diminished predictive power in these patients compared with the general population. This review provides an overview of lipoprotein(a), which is considered a nontraditional risk factor. The characteristic genetic and nongenetic changes of lipoprotein(a) in kidney disease are discussed and set into the context of risk prediction. In particular, genetically determined apolipoprotein(a) polymorphism is a powerful risk predictor for cardiovascular disease and total mortality in these patients. Finally, the limited interventional strategies available to lower lipoprotein(a) are considered.

Lipoprotein (a) downregulates lysosomal acid lipase and induces interleukin-6 in human blood monocytes

The association of elevated lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)) with an increased risk for coronary events is clearly established. This increased risk may in part be due to the activation of monocytes as major cells involved in atherogenesis. High concentrations of plasma Lp(a) were shown to influence the gene expression of human blood monocytes and in the present study we demonstrate a reduced abundance of the lysosomal acid lipase (LAL) mRNA in monocytes of patients with coronary disease and selective Lp(a) hyperlipidemia. This is also supported by in vitro studies where purified Lp(a) but not low-density lipoprotein (LDL) was shown to downregulate mRNA levels of the LAL in control monocytes. A correlation of Lp(a) serum levels and the proinflammatory cytokine IL-6 was recently also described. Therefore, we investigated whether Lp(a) is capable to enhance the release of this acute phase cytokine from human blood monocytes. Purified Lp(a) led to an increased secretion of IL-6, but not TNF-alpha arguing against a general activation of these cells. The association of reduced LAL activity with the premature development of coronary artery disease has been demonstrated in patients with hypercholesterolemia, and in the present study we show for the first time that LAL expression is suppressed in monocytes from patients with Lp(a) hyperlipidemia and by purified Lp(a). In addition, increased levels of IL-6 also predict future cardiovascular events and IL-6 secretion was also induced by purified Lp(a).

A more detailed fatty acid composition of human lipoprotein(a)--a comparison with low density lipoprotein

Lipoprotein(a)'s (Lp(a)'s) fatty acid composition is partially known for the cholesteryl ester (CE), triglyceride (TG) and total phospholipid (PL) fractions. Individual PLs' fatty acids are unknown. This study sought to confirm and extend existing data and elucidate the individual PLs of Lp(a). For Lp(a) versus LDL, the mole percentage saturated fatty acids comprised 11.3+/-1.3 versus 16.8+/-1.2 (CE) (P<0.05), 43.4+/-5.2 versus 39.2+/-4.0 (TG) (P<0.05), 55.7+/-6.3 versus 54.7+/-5.9 (PL) (P>0.05), 51.9+/-3.5 versus 50.2+/-4.2 (choline-containing phospholipids (PC)) (P>0.05), 40.2+/-4.6 versus 43.1+/-3.9 (ethanolamine-containing phospholipids (PE)) (P>0.05), 73.2+/-7.6 versus 81.2+/-8.2 (sphingomyelin (SPH)) (P<0.05). Linoleic acid was CE's major fatty acid and while palmitic acid was the major fatty acid in all other fractions except PE.

Lipoprotein(a): still an enigma?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Lipoprotein(a) belongs to the class of the most atherogenic lipoproteins. Despite intensive research - in the last year more than 80 papers have been published on this topic - information is still lacking on the physiological function of lipoprotein(a) and the site of its catabolism. Important advances have been made in the knowledge of these points, which may have some therapeutic implications.

RECENT FINDINGS

The association of high lipoprotein(a) values with an increase in risk for coronary events has been documented in further prospective studies. This increased risk may relate to recent findings that apolipoprotein(a) is produced in situ within the vessel wall. In addition, lipoprotein(a) binds and inactivates the tissue factor pathway inhibitor and induces plasminogen activator inhibitor type 2 expression in monocytes. A new antisense oligonucleotide strategy has been proposed which efficiently inhibits apolipoprotein(a) expression in vitro and in vivo. Apolipoprotein(a), however, suppresses angiogenesis and thus may interfere with the infiltration of tumor cells. Finally, the enzymatic activity leading to the formation of apolipoprotein(a) fragments in plasma and their catabolism have been further elucidated.

SUMMARY

We are still far away from understanding the pathways involved in lipoprotein(a) catabolism, and the physiological function of this lipoprotein. Recent findings, however, provide new insight into pathomechanisms in patients with increased lipoprotein(a) related to hemostasis, which may serve as a basis for designing new treatment strategies.

An ELISA procedure for human Lp(a) quantitation using monoclonal antibodies

The present study describes a monoclonal antibody-based enzyme immunoassay (ELISA) for the quantitation of lipoprotein(a), Lp(a), in human plasma. Two antibodies to Lp(a), 2F4E7 and 8G12G7, were produced and characterized as specific and high affinity antibodies against Lp(a). A reference control serum was utilized to prepare the standard curve in a Lp(a) concentration range from 0.015 to 0.5 ug/ml. A biotinylated monoclonal antibody against apoB-LDL was used as the second antibody. The comparison of the standardized ELISA using mAb 2F4E7 with an ELISA using a characterized mAb against Lp(a) (clone KO9) as capture antibody showed that the Lp(a) concentration of two standard sera was similar with both assays. Furthermore, when compared with an electroimmunoassay kit, similar Lp(a) concentrations for the standard were also obtained.

Instability of Lipoprotein(a) in Plasma Stored at −70 °C

Background: There is considerable evidence to suggest that plasma lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] concentration is a cardiovascular risk factor. Confusing results in epidemiologic studies, however, suggest that the effects of storage should be further investigated. The influence of the assay method, the initial plasma Lp(a) concentration, and the apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] genotype are all factors that should be considered.

Methods: Blood was obtained from 65 survivors of premature myocardial infarction and 95 age-matched controls. The plasma samples were stored in sterile conditions at −70 °C for 5 years in the presence of antioxidant and antiproteolytic substances. Plasma Lp(a) was measured by immunoturbidimetry, and apo(a) alleles were determined by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and Southern blotting.

Results: Plasma Lp(a) was significantly higher in patients. The mean kringle number for the smallest isoform was also lower in patients than in controls, but no differences were found in the distribution of the largest isoform. All patients and controls were heterozygotes. During storage, mean Lp(a) decreased significantly in samples from patients (−23%; P &lt;0.001) but not in samples from controls (−9%; P, not significant). This was not related to the kringle number and was limited to samples with initial plasma Lp(a) concentrations between 41 and 345 mg/L.

Conclusions: Plasma Lp(a) from patients is less stable than Lp(a) from controls, and the difference is not related to distribution of apo(a) genotypes but may be concentration-dependent. Differential sample stability may complicate the interpretation of several studies.

Impact of apolipoprotein(a) on in vitro angiogenesis

Angiostatin, which consists of the kringle I-IV domains of plasminogen and which is secreted into urine, is an efficient inhibitor of angiogenesis and tumor growth. Because N-terminal apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] fragments, which also contain several types of kringle IV domains, are found in urine as well, we evaluated the potential angiostatic properties of these urinary apo(a) fragments and of a recombinant form of apo(a) [r-apo(a)]. We used human microvascular endothelial cell (hMVEC)-based in vitro assays of tube formation in 3-dimensional fibrin matrixes. Purified urinary apo(a) fragments or r-apo(a) inhibited the basic fibroblast growth factor/tumor necrosis factor-alpha-induced formation of capillary-like structures. At concentrations varying from 0.2 to 10 microgram/mL, urinary apo(a) fragments inhibited tube formation by as much as 70%, whereas there was complete inhibition by r-apo(a). The highest concentrations of both inhibitors also reduced urokinase plasminogen activator production of basic fibroblast growth factor-induced hMVEC proliferation. The inhibitors had no effect on plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 expression. If our in vitro model for angiogenesis is valid for the in vivo situation as well, our data point toward the possibility that apo(a) may also be physiologically operative in modulating angiogenesis, as the concentration of free apo(a) found in humans exceeds that tested herein.

Lipoprotein (a) up-regulates the expression of the plasminogen activator inhibitor 2 in human blood monocytes

Elevated plasma lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) and cardiac events show a modest but significant association in various clinical studies. However, the influence of high Lp(a) on the gene expression in blood monocytes as a major cell involved in atherogenesis is poorly described. To identify genes influenced by elevated serum Lp(a), the gene expression was analyzed on a complementary DNA microarray comparing monocytes from a patient with isolated Lp(a) hyperlipidemia and coronary heart disease with monocytes from a healthy blood donor with low Lp(a). By using this approach, numerous genes were found differentially expressed in patient-versus-control monocytes. Verification of these candidates by Northern blot analysis or semiquantitative polymerase chain reaction in monocytes from additional patients with Lp(a) hyperlipidemia and healthy blood donors with elevated Lp(a) confirmed a significant induction of plasminogen activator inhibitor type 2 (PAI-2) messenger RNA (mRNA) in monocytes from male, but not from female, individuals with high Lp(a), indicating that this observation is gender specific. This led also to increased intracellular and secreted PAI-2 protein in monocytes from male probands with Lp(a) hyperlipidemia. Plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1) mRNA was found suppressed only in the patients' monocytes and not in healthy probands with high Lp(a) levels. Purified Lp(a) induced PAI-2 mRNA and protein and reduced PAI-1 expression in monocytes isolated from various controls. The finding that PAI-2 is elevated in monocytes from male patients with isolated Lp(a) hyperlipidemia and male healthy probands with high Lp(a) and that purified Lp(a) up-regulates PAI-2 in control monocytes in vitro indicate a direct, but gender-specific, effect of Lp(a) for the induction of PAI-2 expression.

Properties of human free apolipoprotein(a) and lipoprotein(a) after either freezing or lyophilization in the presence and absence of cryopreservatives

Apolipoprotein(a), apo(a), the specific multikringle glycoprotein constituent of lipoprotein(a), Lp(a), occurs in the plasma mostly bound to apoB100-containing lipoproteins but also in a free form. Often the properties of these products are determined after storage in the cold; yet limited information is available on their stability at low temperatures. To shed light on this subject, we examined the effect of two parameters, freezing and lyophilization, in either the absence or the presence of cryopreservatives. Lp(a)s each having a single apo(a) size isoform containing either 14 or 17 kringle (K) IVs were isolated from the plasma of healthy donors by combining density gradient ultracentrifugation and lysine-Sepharose column chromatography using solutions containing both antioxidants and proteolytic inhibitors. Apo(a) was obtained from parent Lp(a) by a mild limited reductive procedure. Either freezing at -20 degrees C or lyophilization in the presence of 5% sucrose did not change the electrophoretic, immunochemical, and lysine-binding properties of Lp(a) including its ability to generate free apo(a). Irrespective of source, apo(a) remained stable when either frozen at -20 and -80 degrees C or lyophilized in the presence of 125 mM trehalose. In all cases, the absence of cryopreservatives caused the samples to aggregate irreversibly. Thawed or reconstituted samples of both free and bound apo(a) kept at 4 degrees C under sterile conditions in the presence of antioxidants, proteolytic inhibitors, and cryopreservative exhibited no significant changes in properties within the time of observation. Both apo(a) isoforms gave comparable results. We conclude that apo(a), either free or bound, can be kept stable at low temperatures in the presence of appropriate cryopreservatives.