Site of functional interaction of release factor 1 with the ribosome

Diversity and Similarity of Termination and Ribosome Rescue in Bacterial, Mitochondrial, and Cytoplasmic Translation

When a ribosome encounters the stop codon of an mRNA, it terminates translation, releases the newly made protein, and is recycled to initiate translation on a new mRNA. Termination is a highly dynamic process in which release factors (RF1 and RF2 in bacteria; eRF1•eRF3•GTP in eukaryotes) coordinate peptide release with large-scale molecular rearrangements of the ribosome. Ribosomes stalled on aberrant mRNAs are rescued and recycled by diverse bacterial, mitochondrial, or cytoplasmic quality control mechanisms. These are catalyzed by rescue factors with peptidyl-tRNA hydrolase activity (bacterial ArfA•RF2 and ArfB, mitochondrial ICT1 and mtRF-R, and cytoplasmic Vms1), that are distinct from each other and from release factors. Nevertheless, recent structural studies demonstrate a remarkable similarity between translation termination and ribosome rescue mechanisms. This review describes how these pathways rely on inherent ribosome dynamics, emphasizing the active role of the ribosome in all translation steps.

Mechanism of premature translation termination on a sense codon

Accurate translation termination by release factors (RFs) is critical for the integrity of cellular proteomes. Premature termination on sense codons, for example, results in truncated proteins, whose accumulation could be detrimental to the cell. Nevertheless, some sense codons are prone to triggering premature termination, but the structural basis for this is unclear. To investigate premature termination, we determined a cryo-EM structure of the Escherichia coli 70S ribosome bound with RF1 in response to a UAU (Tyr) sense codon. The structure reveals that RF1 recognizes a UAU codon similarly to a UAG stop codon, suggesting that sense codons induce premature termination because they structurally mimic a stop codon. Hydrophobic interaction between the nucleobase of U3 (the third position of the UAU codon) and conserved Ile-196 in RF1 is important for misreading the UAU codon. Analyses of RNA binding in ribonucleoprotein complexes or by amino acids reveal that Ile-U packing is a frequent protein-RNA-binding motif with key functional implications. We discuss parallels with eukaryotic translation termination by the release factor eRF1.

Anisotropic Fluctuations in the Ribosome Determine tRNA Kinetics

The ribosome is a large ribonucleoprotein complex that is responsible for the production of proteins in all organisms. Accommodation is the process by which an incoming aminoacyl-tRNA (aa-tRNA) molecule binds the ribosomal A site, and its kinetics has been implicated in the accuracy of tRNA selection. In addition to rearrangements in the aa-tRNA molecule, the L11 stalk can undergo large-scale anisotropic motions during translation. To explore the potential impact of this protruding region on the rate of aa-tRNA accommodation, we used molecular dynamics simulations with a simplified model to evaluate the free energy as a function of aa-tRNA position. Specifically, these calculations describe the transition between A/T and elbow-accommodated (EA) configurations (∼20 Å displacement). We find that the free-energy barrier associated with elbow accommodation is proportional to the degree of mobility exhibited by the L11 stalk. That is, when L11 is more rigid, the free-energy barrier height is decreased. This effect arises from the ability of L11 to confine, and thereby destabilize, the A/T ensemble. In addition, when elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) is present, the A/T ensemble is further destabilized in an L11-dependent manner. These results provide a framework that suggests how next-generation experiments may precisely control the dynamics of the ribosome.

Crystallographic analysis of archaeal ribosomal protein L11

Ribosomal protein L11 is an important part of the GTPase-associated centre in ribosomes of all organisms. L11 is a highly conserved two-domain ribosomal protein. The C-terminal domain of L11 is an RNA-binding domain that binds to a fragment of 23S rRNA and stabilizes its structure. The complex between L11 and 23S rRNA is involved in the GTPase activity of the translation elongation and release factors. Bacterial and archaeal L11-rRNA complexes are targets for peptide antibiotics of the thiazole class. To date, there is no complete structure of archaeal L11 owing to the mobility of the N-terminal domain of the protein. Here, the crystallization and X-ray analysis of the ribosomal protein L11 from Methanococcus jannaschii are reported. Crystals of the native protein and its selenomethionine derivative belonged to the orthorhombic space group I222 and were suitable for structural studies. Native and single-wavelength anomalous dispersion data sets have been collected and determination of the structure is in progress.

The flexible N-terminal domain of ribosomal protein L11 from Escherichia coli is necessary for the activation of stringent factor

The stringent response is activated by the binding of stringent factor to stalled ribosomes that have an unacylated tRNA in the ribosomal aminoacyl-site. Ribosomes lacking ribosomal protein L11 are deficient in stimulating stringent factor. L11 consists of a dynamic N-terminal domain (amino acid residues 1-72) connected to an RNA-binding C-terminal domain (amino acid residues 76-142) by a flexible linker (amino acid residues 73-75). In vivo data show that mutation of proline 22 in the N-terminal domain is important for initiation of the stringent response. Here, six different L11 point and deletion-mutants have been constructed to determine which regions of L11 are necessary for the activation of stringent factor. The different mutants were reconstituted with programmed 70 S(DeltaL11) ribosomes and tested for their ability to stimulate stringent factor in a sensitive in vitro pppGpp synthesis assay. It was found that a single-site mutation at proline 74 in the linker region between the two domains did not affect the stimulatory activity of the reconstituted ribosomes, whereas the single-site mutation at proline 22 reduced the activity of SF to 33% compared to ribosomes reconstituted with wild-type L11. Removal of the entire linker between the N and C-terminal domains or removal of the entire proline-rich helix beginning at proline 22 in L11 resulted in an L11 protein, which was unable to stimulate stringent factor in the ribosome-dependent assay. Surprisingly, the N-terminal domain of L11 on its own activated stringent factor in a ribosome-dependent manner without restoring the L11 footprint in 23 S rRNA in the 50 S subunit. This suggests that the N-terminal domain can activate stringent factor in trans. It is also shown that this activation is dependent on unacylated tRNA.

Optimization of a ribosomal structural domain by natural selection

A conserved, independently folding domain in the large ribosomal subunit consists of 58 nt of rRNA and a single protein, L11. The tertiary structure of an rRNA fragment carrying the Escherichia coli sequence is marginally stable in vitro but can be substantially stabilized by mutations found in other organisms. To distinguish between possible reasons why natural selection has not evolved a more stable rRNA structure in E. coli, mutations affecting the rRNA tertiary structure were assessed for their in vitro effects on rRNA stability and L11 affinity (in the context of an rRNA fragment) or in vivo effects on cell growth rate and L11 content of ribosomes. The rRNA fragment stabilities ranged from -4 to +9 kcal/mol relative to the wild-type sequence. Variants in the range of -4 to +5 kcal/mol had almost no observable effect in vivo, while more destabilizing mutations (>7 kcal/mol) were not tolerated. The data suggest that the in vivo stability of the complex is roughly -6 kcal/mol and that any single tertiary interaction is dispensable for function as long as a minimum stability of the complex is maintained. On the basis of these data, it seems that the evolution of this domain has not been constrained by inherent structural or functional limits on stability. The estimated stability corresponds to only a few ribosomes per bacterial cell dissociated from L11 at any time; thus the selective advantage for any further increase in stability may be so small as to be outweighed by other competing selective pressures.

Ribosomal protein L11 mutations in two functional domains equally affect release factors 1 and 2 activity

Bacterial release factors (RFs) 1 and 2 catalyse translation termination at UAG/UAA and UGA/UAA stop codons respectively. It has been shown that limiting the amount of ribosomal protein L11 affects translation termination at UAG and UGA differently. To understand the functional interplay between L11 and RF1/RF2, we isolated 21 distinct mutations in L11 as suppressors of either temperature-sensitive (ts) RF1/RF2 strains or read-through mutants of lacZ nonsense (UAG or UGA) strains. 10 of 21 mutants restored ts lethal growth of RF1 and/or RF2 strains. All the selected L11 mutants, including the RF1ts- and RF2ts-specific suppressors, had the same effect, either enhancing or reducing, on UAG and UGA termination efficiency in vivo. The specific properties of the selected L11 mutations remained unchanged in an RF3 deletion strain. Moreover, ribosomes absent of L11 had equally reduced activity for both RF1- and RF2-mediated peptide release in vitro. These results suggest that, unlike the previous notion, L11 has a common, cooperative role with RF1 and RF2. These L11 mutations were located on the surface of two domains of L11, and interpreted to affect the interaction between L11 and rRNA or the RFs thereby leading to the altered translation termination.

Interactions of the release factor RF1 with the ribosome as revealed by cryo-EM

In eubacteria, termination of translation is signaled by any one of the stop codons UAA, UAG, and UGA moving into the ribosomal A site. Two release factors, RF1 and RF2, recognize and bind to the stop codons with different affinities and trigger the hydrolysis of the ester bond that links the polypeptide with the P-site tRNA. Cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) results obtained in this study show that ribosome-bound RF1 is in an open conformation, unlike the closed conformation observed in the crystal structure of the free factor, allowing its simultaneous access to both the decoding center and the peptidyl-transferase center. These results are similar to those obtained for RF2, but there is an important difference in how the factors bind to protein L11, which forms part of the GTPase-associated center of the large ribosomal subunit. The difference in the binding position, C-terminal domain for RF2 versus N-terminal domain for RF1, explains a body of L11 mutation studies that revealed differential effects on the activity of the two factors. Very recent data obtained with small-angle X-ray scattering now reveal that the solution structure of RF1 is open, as here seen on the ribosome by cryo-EM, and not closed, as seen in the crystal.

Domain reorientation and induced fit upon RNA binding: solution structure and dynamics of ribosomal protein L11 from Thermotoga maritima

L11, a protein of the large ribosomal subunit, binds to a highly conserved domain of 23S rRNA and mediates ribosomal GTPase activity. Its C-terminal domain is the main determinant for rRNA binding, whereas its N-terminal domain plays only a limited role in RNA binding. The N-terminal domain is thought to be involved in interactions with elongation and release factors as well as with the antibiotics thiostrepton and micrococcin. This report presents the NMR solution structure of the full-length L11 protein from the thermophilic eubacterium Thermotoga maritima in its free form. The structure is based on a large number of orientational restraints derived from residual dipolar couplings in addition to conventional NOE-based restraints. The solution structure of L11 demonstrates that, in contrast to many other multidomain RNA-binding proteins, the relative orientation of the two domains is well defined. This is shown both by heteronuclear 15N-relaxation and residual dipolar-coupling data. Comparison of this NMR structure with the X-ray structure of RNA-bound L11, reveals that binding not only induces a rigidification of a flexible loop in the C-terminal domain, but also a sizeable reorientation of the N-terminal domain. The domain orientation in free L11 shows limited similarity to that of ribosome-bound L11 in complex with elongation factor, EF-G.

The role of ribosomal protein L11 in class I release factor-mediated translation termination and translational accuracy

It has been suggested from in vivo and cryoelectron micrographic studies that the large ribosomal subunit protein L11 and its N-terminal domain play an important role in peptide release by, in particular, the class I release factor RF1. In this work, we have studied in vitro the role of L11 in translation termination with ribosomes from a wild type strain (WT-L11), an L11 knocked-out strain (DeltaL11), and an L11 N terminus truncated strain (Cter-L11). Our data show 4-6-fold reductions in termination efficiency (k(cat)/K(m)) of RF1, but not of RF2, on DeltaL11 and Cter-L11 ribosomes compared with wild type. There is, at the same time, no effect of these L11 alterations on the maximal rate of ester bond cleavage by either RF1 or RF2. The rates of dissociation of RF2 but not of RF1 from the ribosome after peptide release are somewhat reduced by the L11 changes irrespective of the presence of RF3, and they cause a 2-fold decrease in the missense error. Our results suggest that the L11 modifications increase nonsense suppression at UAG codons because of the reduced termination efficiency of RF1 and that they decrease nonsense suppression at UGA codons because of a decreased missense error level.

Crystal Structures of the Ribosome in Complex with Release Factors RF1 and RF2 Bound to a Cognate Stop Codon

During protein synthesis, translational release factors catalyze the release of the polypeptide chain when a stop codon on the mRNA reaches the A site of the ribosome. The detailed mechanism of this process is currently unknown. We present here the crystal structures of the ribosome from Thermus thermophilus with RF1 and RF2 bound to their cognate stop codons, at resolutions of 5.9 Angstrom and 6.7 Angstrom, respectively. The structures reveal details of interactions of the factors with the ribosome and mRNA, including elements previously implicated in decoding and peptide release. They also shed light on conformational changes both in the factors and in the ribosome during termination. Differences seen in the interaction of RF1 and RF2 with the L11 region of the ribosome allow us to rationalize previous biochemical data. Finally, this work demonstrates the feasibility of crystallizing ribosomes with bound factors at a defined state along the translational pathway.

Interactions of the N-terminal domain of ribosomal protein L11 with thiostrepton and rRNA

Ribosomal protein L11 has two domains: the C-terminal domain (L11-C76) binds rRNA, whereas the N-terminal domain (L11-NTD) may variously interact with elongation factor G, the antibiotic thiostrepton, and rRNA. To begin to quantitate these interactions, L11 from Bacillus stearothermophilus has been overexpressed and its properties compared with those of L11-C76 alone in a fluorescence assay for protein-rRNA binding. The assay relies on 2'-amino-butyryl-pyrene-uridine incorporated in a 58-nucleotide rRNA fragment, which gives approximately 15-fold enhancement when L11 or L11-C76 is bound. Although the pyrene tag weakens protein binding, unbiased protein-RNA association constants were obtained in competition experiments with untagged RNA. It was found that (i) intact B. stearothermophilus L11 binds rRNA with K approximately 1.2 x 10(9) m(-1) in buffers with 0.2 m KCl, about 100-fold tighter than Escherichia coli L11; (ii) the N-terminal domain makes a small, salt-dependent contribution to the overall L11-RNA binding affinity (approximately 8-fold enhancement at 0.2 m KCl), (iii) L11 stimulates thiostrepton binding by 2.3 +/- 0.6 x 10(3)-fold, predicting an overall thiostrepton affinity for the ribosome of approximately 10(9) m(-1), and (iv) the yeast homolog of L11 shows no stimulation of thiostrepton binding. The latter observation resolves the question of why eukaryotes are insensitive to the antibiotic. These measurements also show that it is plausible for thiostrepton to compete directly with EF-G.GDP for binding to the L11-RNA complex, and provide a quantitative basis for further studies of L11 function and thiostrepton mechanism.

Interaction of thiostrepton and elongation factor-G with the ribosomal protein L11-binding domain

Ribosomal protein L11 and the L11 binding region of ribosomal RNA constitute an important domain involved in active functions of the ribosome during translation. We studied the effects of L11 knock-out and truncation mutations on the structure of the rRNA in this region and on its interactions with a translation elongation factor and the antibiotic thiostrepton. The results indicated that the structure of the L11-binding rRNA becomes conformationally flexible when ribosomes lack the entire L11 protein, but not when the C-terminal domain is present on ribosomes. Probing wild type and mutant ribosomes in the presence of the antibiotic thiostrepton and elongation factor-G (EF-G) rigorously localized the binding cleft of thiostrepton and suggested a role for the rRNA in the L11-binding domain in modulating factor binding. Our results also provide evidence that the structure of the rRNA stabilized by the C-terminal domain of L11 is necessary to stabilize EF-G binding in the post-translocation state, and thiostrepton may modulate this structure in a manner that interferes with the ribosome-EF-G interaction. The implications for recent models of thiostrepton activity and factor interactions are discussed.

Thermus thermophilus L11 methyltransferase, PrmA, is dispensable for growth and preferentially modifies free ribosomal protein L11 prior to ribosome assembly

The ribosomal protein L11 in bacteria is posttranslationally trimethylated at multiple amino acid positions by the L11 methyltransferase PrmA, the product of the prmA gene. The role of L11 methylation in ribosome function or assembly has yet to be determined, although the deletion of Escherichia coli prmA has no apparent phenotype. We have constructed a mutant of the extreme thermophile Thermus thermophilus in which the prmA gene has been disrupted with the htk gene encoding a heat-stable kanamycin adenyltransferase. This mutant shows no growth defects, indicating that T. thermophilus PrmA, like its E. coli homolog, is dispensable. Ribosomes prepared from this mutant contain unmethylated L11, as determined by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS), and are effective substrates for in vitro methylation by cloned and purified T. thermophilus PrmA. MALDI-TOF MS also revealed that T. thermophilus L11 contains a total of 12 methyl groups, in contrast to the 9 methyl groups found in E. coli L11. Finally, we found that, as with the E. coli methyltransferase, the ribosomal protein L11 dissociated from ribosomes is a more efficient substrate for in vitro methylation by PrmA than intact 70S ribosomes, suggesting that methylation in vivo occurs on free L11 prior to its incorporation into ribosomes.

Structural analyses of peptide release factor 1 from Thermotoga maritima reveal domain flexibility required for its interaction with the ribosome

We have determined the crystal structure of peptide chain release factor 1 (RF1) from Thermotoga maritima (gi 4981173) at 2.65 Angstrom resolution by selenomethionine single-wavelength anomalous dispersion (SAD) techniques. RF1 is a protein that recognizes stop codons and promotes the release of a nascent polypeptide from tRNA on the ribosome. Selenomethionine-labeled RF1 crystallized in space group P2(1) with three monomers per asymmetric unit. It has approximate dimensions of 75 Angstrom x 70 Angstrom x 45 Angstrom and is composed of four domains. The overall fold of each RF1 domain shows almost the same topology with Escherichia coli RF2, except that the RF1 N-terminal domain is shorter and the C-terminal domain is longer than that of RF2. The N-terminal domain of RF1 indicates a rigid-body movement relative to that of RF2 with an angle of approximately 90 degrees. Including these features, RF1 has a tripeptide anticodon PVT motif instead of the SPF motif of RF2, which confers the specificity towards the stop codons. The analyses of three molecules in the asymmetric unit and comparison with RF2 revealed the presence of dynamic movement of domains I and III, which are anchored to the central domain by hinge loops. The crystal structure of RF1 elucidates the intrinsic property of this family of having large domain movements for proper function with the ribosome.

Stop codon recognition and interactions with peptide release factor RF3 of truncated and chimeric RF1 and RF2 from Escherichia coli

Release factors RF1 and RF2 recognize stop codons present at the A-site of the ribosome and activate hydrolysis of peptidyl-tRNA to release the peptide chain. Interactions with RF3, a ribosome-dependent GTPase, then initiate a series of reactions that accelerate the dissociation of RF1 or RF2 and their recycling between ribosomes. Two regions of Escherichia coli RF1 and RF2 were identified previously as involved in stop codon recognition and peptidyl-tRNA hydrolysis. We show here that removing the N-terminal domain of RF1 or RF2 or exchanging this domain between the two factors does not affect RF specificity but has different effects on the activity of RF1 and RF2: truncated RF1 remains highly active and able to support rapid cell growth, whereas cells with truncated RF2 grow only poorly. Transplanting a loop of 13 amino acid residues from RF2 to RF1 switches the stop codon specificity. The interaction of the truncated factors with RF3 on the ribosome is defective: they fail to stimulate guanine nucleotide exchange on RF3, recycling is not stimulated by RF3, and nucleotide-free RF3 fails to stabilize the binding of RF1 or RF2 to the ribosome. However, the N-terminal domain seems not to be required for the expulsion of RF1 or RF2 by RF3:GTP.