Elective delayed reduction and no anesthesia: 'minimal intervention management' for gastrochisis

Improving outcomes for uncomplicated gastroschisis: clinical practice guidelines from the American Pediatric Surgical Association Outcomes and Evidence-based Practice Committee

BACKGROUND

The authors sought better outcomes for uncomplicated gastroschisis through development of clinical practice guidelines.

METHODS

The authors and the American Pediatric Surgical Association Outcomes and Evidenced-based Practice Committee used an iterative process and chose two questions to develop clinical practice guidelines regarding (1) standardized nutrition protocols and (2) postnatal management strategies. An English language search of PubMed, MEDLINE, OVID, SCOPUS, and the Cochrane Library Database identified literature published between January 1, 1970, and December 31, 2019, with snowballing to 2022. The Appraisal of Guideline, Research and Evaluation reporting checklist was followed.

RESULTS

Thirty-three studies were included with a Level of Evidence that ranged from 2 to 5 and recommendation Grades B-D. Nine evaluated standardized nutrition protocols and 24 examined postnatal management strategies. The adherence to gastroschisis-specific nutrition protocols promotes intestinal feeding and reduces TPN administration. The implementation of a standardized postnatal clinical management protocol is often significantly associated with shorter hospital stays, less mechanical ventilation use, and fewer infections.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a lack of comparative studies to guide practice changes that improve uncomplicated gastroschisis outcomes. The implementation of gastroschisis-specific feeding and clinical care protocols is recommended. Feeding protocols often significantly reduce TPN administration, although the length of hospital stay may not consistently decrease.

Bedside reduction of gastroschisis: A preliminary experience in yaounde-cameroon

Background

Gastroschisis denotes a congenital or sporadic malformation of the anterior abdominal wall, which is rarely associated with other anomalies. The mortality in African countries is still high almost 100%.

Objective

The aim was to determine the feasibility and safety of bedside reduction of gastroschisis and factors affecting the outcome in low-income setting.

Methodology

This was a retrospective, descriptive and analytic study over a period of 6 years conducted in the Pediatric Surgery Service of the Yaoundé Gyneco-Obstetric and Pediatric Hospital. Only neonates with gastroschisis seen within 6 h of life without bowel necrosis and in whom bedside reduction was attempted in the neonatology unit under sedation (with 0.5 mg/kg of diazepam intra-rectally and 0.5-1 mg of atropine intravenously) were included in this study. Ethical clearance was obtained for the Ethical Committee of the Yaoundé Gyneco-Obstetric and Pediatric Hospital and a signed consent form was required from the parents of the children prior to the procedure.

Results

Twelve neonates with a mean age of 16.8 h (0 and 24 h) and mean birth weight of 2245 g (1860-3600 g) were enrolled. The mean time to presentation at hospital was 3.5 h (2-9 h). Bedside closure was successful in 10 patients. Two patients underwent primary closure in the theatre after failure of bedside reduction due to the volume of contents of gastroschisis. Mortality rate in our study was 33.3% and the morbidity was dominated by compartment syndrome and malnutrition.

Conclusion

Bedside reduction of gastroschisis under sedation in Yaoundé seems to be way to reduce the mortality.

Avoidance of routine endotracheal intubation and general anesthesia for primary closure of gastroschisis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Over the last few decades, several articles have examined the feasibility of attempting primary reduction and closure of gastroschisis without general anesthesia (GA). We aimed to systematically evaluate the impact of forgoing routine intubation and GA during primary bedside reduction and closure of gastroschisis.

METHODS

The primary outcome was closure success. Secondary outcomes were mortality, time to enteral feeding, and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

12 studies were included: 5 comparative studies totalling 192 patients and 7 descriptive case studies totalling 56 patients. Primary closure success was statistically equivalent between the two groups, but trended toward improved success with GA/intubation (RR = 0.86, CI 0.70-1.03, p = 0.08). Mortality was equivalent between groups (RR = 1.26, CI 0.26-6.08, p = 0.65). With respect to time to enteral feeds and length of hospital stay, outcomes were either equivalent between the two groups or favored the group that underwent primary closure without intubation and GA.

CONCLUSION

There are few comparative studies examining the impact of performing primary bedside closure of gastroschisis without GA. A meta-analysis of the available data found no statistically significant difference when forgoing intubation and GA. Foregoing GA also did not negatively impact time to enteral feeds, length of hospital stay, or mortality.

Umbilical hernia repair post umbilical cord graft closure of gastroschisis: A cohort study

Introduction

Gastroschisis a common congenital anomaly in the anterior abdominal wall, the bowel is present outside the abdominal cavity, completely devoid of any coverings, management of gastroschisis involves umbilical cord graft coverage of the defect after bowel reduction when there are concerns about compartmental syndrome, this is a widely used technique but there are few reports about the incidence umbilical hernia development after this technique and need for future repair of the defect.

Presentation of cases

We had 8 patients with simple gastroschisis who had umbilical cord graft coverage of the defect at birth between 2017 and 2020, we present 4 patients who had the cord graft without cutting of rectus fascia, 2 patients resolved spontaneously and 2 developed an umbilical hernia requiring repair.

Discussion

Umbilical cord graft has been reported in several studies, in those studies the authors reported the spontaneous closure of the defect and some reported that incising the rectus fascia will contribute to development of the umbilical hernia, in our series the rectus fascia was preserved yet 2 patients developed umbilical hernia.

Conclusion

Pediatric surgeons should look out for umbilical hernia in patients who had umbilical cord graft repair of gastroschisis defect and closure should be carried out by an experienced surgeon.

•

Umbilical cord graft is used in closure of gastroschisis defect.

•

Umbilical cord graft used when there are concerns about compartment pressure.

•

Umbilical hernia can develop following this technique.

•

Incision of rectus fascia increases the incidence of umbilical hernia.

•

Umbilical hernia repair can be challenging due to adhesions.

The incidence of abdominal surgical site infections after abdominal birth defects surgery in infants: A systematic review with meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Surgical site infections (SSI) are a frequent and significant problem understudied in infants operated for abdominal birth defects. Different forms of SSIs exist, namely wound infection, wound dehiscence, anastomotic leakage, post-operative peritonitis and fistula development. These complications can extend hospital stay, surge medical costs and increase mortality. If the incidence was known, it would provide context for clinical decision making and aid future research. Therefore, this review aims to aggregate the available literature on the incidence of different SSIs forms in infants who needed surgery for abdominal birth defects.

METHOD

The electronic databases Pubmed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library were searched in February 2020. Studies describing infectious complications in infants (under three years of age) were considered eligible. Primary outcome was the incidence of SSIs in infants. SSIs were categorized in wound infection, wound dehiscence, anastomotic leakage, postoperative peritonitis, and fistula development. Secondary outcome was the incidence of different forms of SSIs depending on the type of birth defect. Meta-analysis was performed pooling reported incidences in total and per birth defect separately.

RESULTS

154 studies, representing 11,786 patients were included. The overall pooled percentage of wound infections after abdominal birth defect surgery was 6% (95%-CI:0.05-0.07) ranging from 1% (95% CI:0.00-0.05) for choledochal cyst surgery to 10% (95%-CI:0.06-0.15) after gastroschisis surgery. Wound dehiscence occurred in 4% (95%-CI:0.03-0.07) of the infants, ranging from 1% (95%-CI:0.00-0.03) after surgery for duodenal obstruction to 6% (95%-CI:0.04-0.08) after surgery for gastroschisis. Anastomotic leakage had an overall pooled percentage of 3% (95%-CI:0.02-0.05), ranging from 1% (95%-CI:0.00-0.04) after surgery for duodenal obstruction to 14% (95% CI:0.06-0.27) after colon atresia surgery. Postoperative peritonitis and fistula development could not be specified per birth defect and had an overall pooled percentage of 3% (95%-CI:0.01-0.09) and 2% (95%-CI:0.01-0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

This review has systematically shown that SSIs are common after correction for abdominal birth defects and that the distribution of SSI differs between birth defects.

Management of Gastroschisis: Results From the NETS2G Study, a Joint British, Irish, and Canadian Prospective Cohort Study of 1268 Infants

OBJECTIVE

In infants with gastroschisis, outcomes were compared between those where operative reduction and fascial closure were attempted ≤24 hours of age (PC), and those who underwent planned closure of their defect >24 hours of age following reduction with a pre-formed silo (SR).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Inadequate evidence exists to determine how best to treat infants with gastroschisis.

METHODS

A secondary analysis was conducted of data collected 2006-2008 using the British Association of Pediatric Surgeons Congenital Anomalies Surveillance System, and 2005-2016 using the Canadian Pediatric Surgery Network.28-day outcomes were compared between infants undergoing PC and SR. Primary outcome was number of gastrointestinal complications. Interactions were investigated between infant characteristics and treatment to determine whether intervention effect varied in sub-groups of infants.

RESULTS

Data from 341 British and Irish infants (27%) and 927 Canadian infants (73%) were used. 671 infants (42%) underwent PC and 597 (37%) underwent SR. The effect of SR on outcome varied according to the presence/absence of intestinal perforation, intestinal matting and intestinal necrosis. In infants without these features, SR was associated with fewer gastrointestinal complications [aIRR 0.25 (95% CI 0.09-0.67, P = 0.006)], more operations [aIRR 1.40 (95% CI 1.22-1.60, P < 0.001)], more days PN [aIRR 1.08 (95% CI 1.03-1.13, P < 0.001)], and a higher infection risk [aOR 2.06 (95% CI 1.10-3.87, P = 0.025)]. In infants with these features, SR was associated with a greater number of operations [aIRR 1.30 (95% CI 1.17-1.45, P < 0.001)], and more days PN [aIRR 1.06 (95% CI 1.02-1.10, P = 0.003)].

CONCLUSIONS

In infants without intestinal perforation, matting, or necrosis, the benefits of SR outweigh its drawbacks. In infants with these features, the opposite is true. Treatment choice should be based upon these features.

What is the main factor in predicting the morbidity and mortality in patients with gastroschisis: delivery time, delivery mode, closure method, or the type of gastroschisis (simple or complex)?

Background/aim

There are numerous debates in the management of gastroschisis (GS). The current study aimed to evaluate perinatal outcomes and surgical and clinical characteristics among GS patients based on their type of GS, abdominal wall closure method, and delivery timing.

Materials and methods

This study was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of 29 fetuses with GS that were prenatally diagnosed, delivered, and managed between June 2015 and December 2019 at the Obstetrics and Pediatric Surgery Clinics of Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Training and Research Hospital.

Results

Twenty-three of the patients had simple GS, and six of them had complex GS. The reoperation requirement, number of operations, duration of mechanical ventilation, time to initiate feeding, time to full enteral feeding, total parenteral nutrition (TPN) duration, TPN-associated cholestasis, wound infection, sepsis, and necrotizing enterocolitis were significantly lower in the simple GS group than in the complex GS group. The mean hospital length of stay was 3.5 times longer in the complex GS group (121.50 ± 24.42 days) than in the simple GS group (33.91 ± 4.13 days, p = 0.009). There were no cases of death in the simple GS group. However, two deaths occurred in the complex GS group.

Conclusion

This study indicated that simple GS, compared with complex GS, was associated with improved neonatal outcomes. We suggest that the main factor affecting the patients’ outcomes is whether the patient is a simple or complex GS rather than the abdominal wall closure method.

High Abdominal Perfusion Pressure Using Umbilical Cord Flap in the Management of Gastroschisis

Background: Gastroschisis management remains a controversy. Most surgeons prefer reduction and fascial closure. Others advise staged reduction to avoid a sudden rise in intra-abdominal pressure (IAP). This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of using the umbilical cord as a flap (without skin on the top) for tension-free repair of gastroschisis. Methods: In a prospective study of neonates with gastroschisis repaired between January 2018 to October 2020 in Tanta University Hospital, we used the umbilical cord as a flap after the evacuation of all its blood vessels and suturing the edges of the cord with the skin edges of the defect. They were guided by monitoring abdominal perfusion pressure (APP), peak inspiratory pressure (PIP), central venous pressure (CVP), and urine output during 24 and 48 h postoperatively. The umbilical cord flap is used for tension-free closure of gastroschisis if PIP > 24 mmHg, IAP > 20 cmH₂O (15 mmHg), APP <50 mmHg, and CVP > 15cmH₂O. Results: In 20 cases that had gastroschisis with a median age of 24 h, we applied the umbilical cord flap in all cases and then purse string (Prolene Zero) with daily tightening till complete closure in seven cases, secondary suturing after 10 days in four cases, and leaving skin creeping until complete closure in nine cases. During the trials of closure, the range of APP was 49-52 mmHg. The range of IAP (IVP) was 15-20 cmH₂O (11-15 mmHg), the range of PIP was 22-25 cmH₂O, the range of CVP was 13-15 cmH₂O, and the range of urine output was 1-1.5 ml/kg/h. Conclusion: The umbilical cord flap is an easy, feasible, and cheap method for tension-free closure of gastroschisis with limiting the PIP ≤ 24 mmHg, IAP ≤ 20 cmH₂O (15 mmHg), APP > 50 mmHg, and CVP ≤ 15cmH₂O.

Sutureless closure: a versatile treatment for the diverse presentations of gastroschisis

OBJECTIVE

Case series have demonstrated sutureless closures to be safe for the correction of gastroschisis. We hypothesize that sutureless closure is efficacious in patients requiring silo reduction without need for intubation.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a retrospective case control study of infants who underwent gastroschisis repair at our institution (January 2011-August 2018). Patient characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared between sutureless closure and primary fascial repair groups.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients in the sutureless group and 28 patients in the primary fascial repair group were included. Success of sutureless closure was 94%. Mechanical ventilation was reduced by 2.8 days in the sutureless group (P < 0.0001) and fewer patients required general anesthesia (29.4% vs. 100%, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Sutureless closure is effective for the diverse presentations of gastroschisis. Given the concerns of effects of general anesthesia on the developing brain, sutureless closure should be strongly considered.

Serial Reduction of an Extremely Large Gastroschisis using Vacuum-Assisted Closure

We herein describe a case of serial reduction of an extremely large and complex gastroschisis using vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) therapy in a boy born at 35 ^5/7 weeks' gestation. A spring-loaded silicone silo was placed at birth. By day of life (DOL) 22, minimal visceral contents had been reduced, and the silo was difficult to maintain due to the size of the fascial defect and loss of abdominal domain. A bespoke VAC dressing was constructed, and biweekly dressing changes allowed gradual reduction of the gastroschisis until the viscera were consolidated. By DOL 50, the viscera were completely reduced, and VAC therapy was discontinued. Feeds were commenced on DOL 57 and increased to goal by DOL 86. The baby was discharged home on DOL 115. We conclude that VAC dressings can be used to aid gradual reduction of an extremely large gastroschisis, particularly in medical fragile infants.

A Gastroschisis bundle: effects of a quality improvement protocol on morbidity and mortality

OBJECTIVE

Gastroschisis incidence is rising. Survival in developed countries is over 95%. However, in underdeveloped countries, mortality is higher than 15% often due to sepsis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect on morbidity and mortality of a Quality Improvement Protocol for out-born gastroschisis patients.

METHODS

The protocol consisted in facilitating transport, primary or staged reduction at the bedside and sutureless closure, without anesthesia, PICC lines and early feeding. Data was prospectively collected for the Protocol Group (PG) treated between June 2014 through March 2016 and compared to the last consecutive patients Historical Group (HG). Primary outcome was mortality.

SECONDARY OUTCOMES

need for and duration of mechanical ventilation (MV), time to first feed (TFF) after closure, parenteral nutrition (TPN), length of stay (LOS) and sepsis. Data were analyzed using χ2 and Mann-Whitney U tests.

RESULTS

92 patients were included (46 HG and 46 PG). Demographic data were homogeneous. Mortality decreased from 22% to 2% (p = 0.007). Mechanical ventilation use decreased from 100% to 57% (p = <0.001), ventilator days from 14 to 3 median days (p = <0.0001), TPN days: 27 to 21 median days (p = 0.026), sepsis decreased from 70% to 37% (p = 0.003) and anesthesia from a 100% to 15% (p = <0.001), respectively. No difference was found in NPO or LOS.

CONCLUSION

A major improvement in the morbidity and mortality rates was achieved, with outcomes comparable to those reported in developed countries. It was suitable for all patients with gastroschisis. We believe this protocol can be implemented in other centers to reduce morbidity and mortality.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Care of infants with gastroschisis in low-resource settings

There is great global disparity in the outcome of infants born with gastroschisis. Mortality approaches 100% in many low income countries. Barriers to better outcomes include lack of antenatal diagnosis, deficient pre-hospital care, ineffective neonatal resuscitation and venous access, limited intensive care facilities, poor access to the operating theatre and safe neonatal anesthesia, and lack of neonatal parenteral nutrition. However, lessons can be learned from the evolution in management of gastroschisis in high-income countries, generic efforts to improve neonatal survival in low- and middle-income countries as well as specific gastroschisis management initiatives in low-resource settings. Micro and meso-level interventions include educational outreach programs, and pre and in hospital management protocols that focus on resuscitation and include the delay or avoidance of early neonatal anesthesia by using a preformed silo or equivalent. Furthermore, multidisciplinary team training, nurse empowerment, and the intentional involvement of mothers in monitoring and care provision may contribute to improving survival. Macro level interventions include the incorporation of ultrasound into World Health Organisation antenatal care guidelines to improve antenatal detection and the establishment of the infrastructure to enable parenteral nutrition provision for neonates in low- and middle-income countries. On a global level, gastroschisis has been suggested as a bellwether condition for evaluating access to and outcomes of neonatal surgical care provision.

Use of quality improvement (QI) methodology to decrease length of stay (LOS) for newborns with uncomplicated gastroschisis

PURPOSE

Gastroschisis is a congenital defect of the abdominal wall leading to considerable morbidity and long hospitalizations. The purpose of this study was to use quality improvement methodology to standardize care in the management of gastroschisis that may contribute to length of stay (LOS).

METHODS

A gastroschisis quality improvement team established a best-practice protocol in order to decrease LOS in infants with uncomplicated gastroschisis. The specific aim was to decrease median LOS from a baseline of 34days. We used statistical process control charts including rational subgroup analysis to monitor LOS.

RESULTS

From December 2008 to December 2016, 119 patients with uncomplicated gastroschisis were evaluated. Retrospective data were obtained on 25 patients prior to protocol implementation. Ninety-four patients with uncomplicated gastroschisis comprised the prospective process stage. The median LOS for this retrospective cohort was 34days (IQR: 30.5-50.5), while the median LOS for the prospective cohort following implementation of the protocol decreased to 29days (IQR: 23-43).

CONCLUSIONS

With the use of quality improvement methodology, including standardization of care and a change in surgical approach, the median LOS for newborns with uncomplicated gastroschisis at our institution decreased from 34days to 29days.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

The influence of gestational age, mode of delivery and abdominal wall closure method on the surgical outcome of neonates with uncomplicated gastroschisis

AIM OF THE STUDY

To evaluate if gestational age (GA), mode of delivery and abdominal wall closure method influence outcomes in uncomplicated gastroschisis (GTC).

METHODS

Retrospective review of NICU admissions for gastroschisis, August 2008-July 2016. Primary outcomes were: time to start enteral feeds (on-EF), time to discontinue parenteral nutrition (off-PN), and length of stay (LOS).

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 200 patients with GTC were admitted to our NICU. Patients initially operated elsewhere (n = 13) were excluded. Patients with medical/surgical complications (n = 62) were analyzed separately. The study included 125 cases of uncomplicated GTC. There were no statistically significant differences in the outcomes of patients born late preterm (34 0/7-36 6/7; n = 70) and term (n = 40): on-EF 19 (5-54) versus 17 (7-34) days (p = 0.29), off-PN 32 (12-101) versus 30 (16-52) days (p = 0.46) and LOS 40 (18-137) versus 37 (21-67) days (p = 0.29), respectively. Patients born before 34 weeks GA (n = 15) had significantly longer on-EF, off-PN and LOS times compared to late preterm patients: 26 (12-50) days (p = 0.01), 41 (20-105) days (p = 0.04) and 62 (34-150) days (p < 0.01), respectively. There were no significant differences in outcomes between patients delivered by C-section (n = 62) and patients delivered vaginally (n = 63): on-EF 20 (5-50) versus 19 (7-54) days (p = 0.72), off-PN 32 (12-78) versus 33 (15-105) days (p = 0.83), LOS 42 (18-150) versus 41 (18-139) days (p = 0.68), respectively. There were significant differences in outcomes between patients who underwent primary reduction (n = 37) and patients who had a silo (88): on-EF 15 (5-37) versus 22 (6-54) days (p < 0.01), off-PN 28 (12-52) versus 34 (15-105) days (p = 0.04), LOS 36 (18-72) versus 44 (21-150) days (p = 0.04), respectively.

CONCLUSION

In our experience, late preterm delivery did not affect outcomes compared to term delivery in uncomplicated GTC. Outcomes were also not influenced by the mode of delivery. Patients who underwent primary reduction had better outcomes than patients who underwent silo placement.

Variability in outcomes after gastroschisis closure across U.S. children's hospitals

BACKGROUND

In patients undergoing gastroschisis closure, the effects of timing of closure and patient and hospital-level characteristics on length of stay (LOS) and time to enteral autonomy are unknown.

STUDY DESIGN

Using the Pediatric Health Information System, we compared neonates who underwent early (within 1day of birth) versus delayed (>1day after birth) gastroschisis closure from 2005 to 2013. We evaluated the relationship between time to closure and both LOS and days on total parenteral nutrition (TPN).

RESULTS

Of 4459 neonates with gastroschisis, 43.9% underwent early closure and 56.1% underwent delayed closure. Delayed closure, complicated gastroschisis, government insurance, lower birth weight, older age at closure, and complex chronic conditions were associated with longer LOS and days on TPN (all p<0.05). There was significant inter-hospital variability in both outcomes, after adjusting for patient- and hospital-level characteristics, including hospitals' gastroschisis and neonatal volumes, median age at closure, and percentages of complicated and delayed gastroschisis patients, (p<0.01).

CONCLUSION

Delayed gastroschisis closure is associated with longer LOS and duration of TPN, even after excluding complicated cases. Furthermore, after controlling for hospital volume, rate of complicated gastroschisis, and timing of closure, the persistent inter-hospital variability suggests that practice variability is partially responsible for these differences.

TYPE OF STUDY

Retrospective study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

A novel approach in the treatment of neonatal gastroschisis: a review of the literature and a single-center experience

Gastroschisis is a congenital abdominal wall defect and its management remains an issue. We performed a review of the literature to summarize its evaluation, management and outcome and we describe a new type of surgical reduction performed in our center without anesthesia (GA), immediately after birth, in the delivery room. Between January 2002 and March 2013, we enrolled all live born infants with gastroschisis referred to the third-level Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology "San Camillo" of Rome. Two groups of infants were identified: group 1 in which gastroschis reduction was performed by the traditional technique and group 2 in which reduction was immediately performed after birth in the delivery room without GA. Twelve infants were enrolled in group 1, and seven infants in group 2. Statistical significance was observed between the groups regarding the hospital stay, for the duration of parenteral nutrition and full oral feeds (p = .004). Survival was similar between two groups. The reduction without GA performed immediately after birth in a delivery room encourages the relationship between the mother and her child and appears to be a safe and feasible technique in a selected group of patients with simple gastroschisis defect; for this reason, it could represent a valid alternative to traditional approach.

Complications in neonatal surgery

Neonatal surgery is recognized as an independent discipline in general surgery, requiring the expertise of pediatric surgeons to optimize outcomes in infants with surgical conditions. Survival following neonatal surgery has improved dramatically in the past 60 years. Improvements in pediatric surgical outcomes are in part attributable to improved understanding of neonatal physiology, specialized pediatric anesthesia, neonatal critical care including sophisticated cardiopulmonary support, utilization of parenteral nutrition and adjustments in fluid management, refinement of surgical technique, and advances in surgical technology including minimally invasive options. Nevertheless, short and long-term complications following neonatal surgery continue to have profound and sometimes lasting effects on individual patients, families, and society.

Umbilical hernia following gastroschisis closure: a common event?

PURPOSE

To assess incidence and natural history of umbilical hernia following sutured and sutureless gastroschisis closure.

METHODS

With audit approval, we undertook a retrospective clinical record review of all gastroschisis closures in our institution (2007-2013). Patient demographics, gastroschisis closure method and umbilical hernia occurrence were recorded. Data, presented as median (range), underwent appropriate statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients were identified, gestation 36 weeks (31-38), birth weight 2.39 kg (1-3.52) and 23 (43 %) were male. Fourteen patients (26 %) underwent sutureless closure: 12 primary, 2 staged; and 39 (74 %) sutured closure: 19 primary, 20 staged. Sutured closure was interrupted sutures in 24 patients, 11 pursestring and 4 not specified. Fifty patients were followed-up over 53 months (10-101) and 22 (44 %) developed umbilical hernias. There was a significantly greater hernia incidence following sutureless closure (p = 0.0002). In sutured closure, pursestring technique had the highest hernia rate (64 %). Seven patients underwent operative hernia closure; three secondary to another procedure. Seven patients had their hernias resolve. One patient was lost to follow-up and seven remain under observation with no reported complications.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a significant umbilical hernia incidence following sutureless and pursestring sutured gastroschisis closure. This has not led to complications and the majority have not undergone repair.

Management of gastroschisis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The diagnosis and treatment of gastroschisis spans the perinatal disciplines of maternal fetal medicine, neonatology, and pediatric surgery. Since gastroschisis is one of the commonest and costliest structural birth defects treated in neonatal ICUs, a comprehensive review of its epidemiology, prenatal diagnosis, postnatal treatment, and short and long-term outcomes is both timely and relevant.

RECENT FINDINGS

The incidence of gastroschisis has increased dramatically over the past 20 years, leading to a renewed interest in causation. The widespread availability of maternal screening and ultrasound results in very high rates of prenatal diagnosis, which enables evaluation of the optimal timing and mode of delivery. The preferred method of surgical closure continues to be an issue of debate among pediatric surgeons, whereas postsurgical treatment seeks to expedite the initiation and progression of enteral feeding and minimize complications. A small subset of babies with complex gastroschisis leading to intestinal failure benefit from the knowledge and expertise of dedicated interdisciplinary teams, which seek to bring novel therapies and improved clinical outcomes.

SUMMARY

The opportunities to increase the knowledge of causation, and identify best practices leading to improved outcomes, drive the ongoing need for collaborative clinical research in gastroschisis.

Flap versus fascial closure for gastroschisis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Flap closure represents an alternative to fascial closure for gastroschisis. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes comparing these techniques.

METHODS

A registered systematic review (

PROSPERO

CRD42015016745) of comparative studies was performed, querying multiple databases without language or date restrictions. Gray literature was sought. Outcomes analyzed included: mortality, ventilation days, feeding parameters, length of stay (LOS), wound infection, resource utilization, and umbilical hernia incidence. Multiple reviewers independently assessed study eligibility and literature quality. Meta-analysis of outcomes was performed where appropriate (Revman 5.2).

RESULTS

Twelve studies met inclusion criteria, of which three were multi-institutional. Quality assessment revealed unbiased patient selection and exposure, but group comparability was suboptimal in four studies. Overall, 1124 patients were evaluated, of which 350 underwent flap closure (210 immediately; 140 post-silo). Meta-analysis revealed no significant differences in mortality, LOS, or feeding parameters between groups. Flap patients had less wound infections (OR 0.40 [95%CI 0.22-0.74], P=0.003). While flap patients had an increased risk of umbilical hernia, they were less likely to undergo repair (19% vs. 41%; P=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Flap closure has equivalent or superior outcomes to fascial closure for patients with gastroschisis. Given potential advantages of bedside closure and reduced sedation requirements, flap closure may represent the preferred closure strategy.

Challenges of improving the evidence base in smaller surgical specialties, as highlighted by a systematic review of gastroschisis management

Objective

To identify methods of improving the evidence base in smaller surgical specialties, using a systematic review of gastroschisis management as an example.

Background

Operative primary fascial closure (OPFC), and silo placement with staged reduction and delayed closure (SR) are the most commonly used methods of gastroschisis closure. Relative merits of each are unclear.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed comparing outcomes following OPFC and SR in infants with simple gastroschisis. Primary outcomes of interest were mortality, length of hospitalization and time to full enteral feeding.

Results

751 unique articles were identified. Eight met the inclusion criteria. None were randomized controlled trials. 488 infants underwent OPFC and 316 underwent SR. Multiple studies were excluded because they included heterogeneous populations and mixed intervention groups. Length of stay was significantly longer in the SR group (mean difference 8.97 days, 95% CI 2.14–15.80 days), as was number of post-operative days to complete enteral feeding (mean difference 7.19 days, 95%CI 2.01–12.36 days). Mortality was not statistically significantly different, although the odds of death were raised in the SR group (OR 1.96, 95%CI 0.71–5.35).

Conclusions

Despite showing some benefit of OPFC over SR, our results are tempered by the low quality of the available studies, which were small and variably reported. Coordinating research through a National Paediatric Surgical Trials Unit could alleviate many of these problems. A similar national approach could be used in other smaller surgical specialties.

A risk-stratified comparison of fascial versus flap closure techniques on the early outcomes of infants with gastroschisis

BACKGROUND

While fascial closure is traditionally used in gastroschisis (GS), flap closure (skin or umbilical cord) has gained popularity. We evaluated early outcomes and complications of the two techniques.

METHODS

A national, population-based gastroschisis data registry was analyzed from 2005 to 2011. We compared fascial to flap closures and stratified patients into low or high-risk groups using the Gastroschisis Prognostic Score (GPS), a validated marker of post-natal bowel injury. Demographic and outcome data, including length of stay, complications, and markers of resource utilization were analyzed using Fisher's exact and Student's t-tests for categorical and continuous variables, respectively (p<0.05 significant).

RESULTS

The analyzed dataset included 436 fascial closures (344 [78.8%] low-risk, 92 high-risk) and 129 flap closures (112 [86.7%] low-risk, 17 high-risk; p=0.06). Demographics and birth weight did not differ between groups. In patients with low GPS, flap closure demonstrated significant decreases in resource utilization and failure of closure, without differences in complication rates. Analysis of high-risk patients revealed no statistically significant differences in outcome.

CONCLUSION

Flap closure was not associated with an increase in patient morbidity and seemed suitable as a definitive closure method for gastroschisis patients irrespective of disease severity. Furthermore, flap closure reduced several markers of resource utilization in patients with low-risk disease.

Use of paralysis in silo-assisted closure of gastroschisis

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association between pre-closure neuromuscular paralysis and time to final surgical closure for infants with gastroschisis undergoing silo reduction.

STUDY DESIGN

This study was an exploratory review of observational variables obtained from the Canadian Pediatric Surgery Network database. The focus was on the subset of infants with gastroschisis undergoing silo reduction between May 2005 and March 2009. Of the 186 infants, paralysis use could be ascertained for 167 infants (79 received pre-closure paralysis and 88 received none). Groups were compared by using statistical tests, with relationships explored using regression analysis.

RESULTS

Infants receiving paralysis took longer to achieve closure by an average of 3 days (8 versus 5 days; P < .001) and had greater mean number of ventilation days (12 versus 7 days; P < .001). The relationship between paralysis and days to closure remained after adjusting for other variables.

CONCLUSIONS

In infants with gastroschisis undergoing silo reduction, use of paralysis was associated with longer time to closure. Pre-closure paralysis should be carefully weighed in this population.

Fetal counselling for surgical conditions

Foetal counselling is best achieved by a multidisciplinary team that can favourably influence the perinatal management of prenatally diagnosed anomalies and provide this information to prospective parents. Prenatal diagnosis has remarkably improved our understanding of surgically correctable congenital malformations. It has allowed us to influence the delivery of the baby, offer prenatal surgical management and discuss the options of termination of pregnancy for seriously handicapping or lethal conditions. Antenatal diagnosis has also defined an in utero mortality for some lesions such as diaphragmatic hernia and sacrococcygeal teratoma so that true outcomes can be measured. The limitation of in-utero diagnosis cannot be ignored. The aim of prenatal counselling is to provide information to prospective parents on foetal outcomes, possible interventions, appropriate setting, time and route of delivery and expected postnatal outcomes, immediate and long term.

Umbilical cord inverting technique: a simple method to utilize the umbilical cord as a biologic dressing for sutureless gastroschisis closure

A sutureless gastroschisis closure provides a cosmetically appealing outcome. The umbilical cord is usually used as a covering material in a sutureless closure because it is a native tissue. However, during the staged closure with a silo placement, special attention is required to keep the umbilical cord moist. The authors report a simple technique to preserve the feasibility of the umbilical cord as a biologic dressing during the silo placement in staged gastroschisis closures.

Ward reduction of gastroschisis: risk stratification helps optimise the outcome

PURPOSE

Categorization of gastroschisis into low risk (simple) and high risk (complex) has been reported as an important determinant of outcome. The role of risk categorization in choosing the optimal surgical approach is unreported. This study aims to investigate the role of risk categorization in decision making for ward reduction of gastroschisis.

METHODS

Data on a cohort of 52 consecutive neonates with gastroschisis between 2000 and 2009 were reviewed. A clinical pathway based on risk categorization was implemented in 2004, and children with simple gastroschisis underwent ward reduction and those with complex gastroschisis underwent surgical closure. Thirty-three neonates since 2004 were analysed and compared to the 19 born prior to 2004.

RESULTS

Of the 33 children with gastroschisis in the study group, 23 were assessed as simple and underwent ward reduction with 96% survival. Ten had complex gastroschisis and underwent varying surgical procedures. Only six out of ten children (60%) with complex gastroschisis survived in spite of multiple surgical attempts.

CONCLUSIONS

Risk stratification of gastroschisis at birth helps in choosing optimal surgical management. Ward reduction can be successfully and safely performed in all children with simple gastroschisis. Those with complex gastroschisis require conventional surgical treatment.

Gastroschisis: an update

Gastroschisis (GS) continues to increase in frequency, with several studies now reported an incidence of between 4 and 5 per 10,000 live births. The main risk factor would seem to be young maternal age, and it is in this group that the greatest increase has occurred. Whilst various geographical regions confer a higher risk, the impact of several other putative risk factors, including smoking and illicit drug use, may be less important than when first identified in early epidemiological studies. Over 90% of cases of GS will now be diagnosed on antenatal ultrasound, but its value in determining the need for early delivery remains unclear. There would appear no clear evidence for either routine early delivery or elective caesarean section for infants with antenatally diagnosed GS. Delivery at a centre with paediatric surgical facilities reduces the risk of subsequent morbidity and should represent the standard of care. The relative roles of primary closure, staged closure and ward reduction, with or without general anaesthesia, appear less clear with considerable variation between centres in both the use of these techniques and subsequent surgical outcomes. Survival rates continue to improve, with rates well in excess of 90% now routine. The limited long-term developmental data available would suggest that normal or near-normal outcomes may be expected although there remains a need for further studies.

Gastroschisis: a national cohort study to describe contemporary surgical strategies and outcomes

BACKGROUND

Information on adoption of newer surgical strategies for gastroschisis and their outcomes is largely limited to hospital-based studies. The aim of this study was to use a new UK national surveillance system to identify cases and thus to describe the contemporary surgical management and outcomes of gastroschisis.

METHODS

We conducted a national cohort study using the British Association of Paediatric Surgeons Congenital Anomalies Surveillance System to identify cases between October 2006 and March 2008.

RESULTS

All 28 surgical units in the United Kingdom and Ireland participated (100%). Data were received for 95% of notified cases of gastroschisis (n = 393). Three hundred thirty-six infants (85.5%) had simple gastroschisis; 45 infants (11.5%) had complex gastroschisis. For 12 infants (3.0%), the type of gastroschisis could not be categorized. Operative primary closure (n = 170, or 51%) and staged closure after a preformed silo (n = 120, or 36%) were the most commonly used intended techniques for simple gastroschisis. Outcomes for infants with complex gastroschisis were significantly poorer than for simple cases, although all deaths occurred in the simple group.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides a comprehensive picture of current UK practice in the surgical management of gastroschisis. Further follow-up data will help to elucidate additional prognostic factors and guide future research.

The evidence base for neonatal surgery

The practise of evidence based medicine means integrating the clinical expertise with the best available external clinical evidence from systematic research. There is a lack of supporting scientific evidence from rigorous trials in neonatal surgery. The indications for surgery and the type of operation performed in neonates are rarely supported by randomised controlled trials. As a consequence, the majority of the operations performed in neonates are supported by retrospective studies and surgeon preference. This review article is focussed on operations in neonates which are performed by general paediatric surgeons. Only a few randomised controlled trials have been performed in neonatal diseases such as congenital diaphragmatic hernia, necrotizing enterocolitis, pyloric stenosis and inguinal hernia. All of these trials have been based on collaboration between paediatric surgical units highlighting the importance of creating a network of centres that will promote multicentre prospective studies.

Spontaneous sutureless closure of the abdominal wall defect in gastroschisis using a commercial wound retractor system

PURPOSE

We report our experience of using a commercial wound protector and retractor system to allow spontaneous sutureless closure of the abdominal wall defect in gastroschisis.

METHODS

Following birth, eviscerated bowel is wrapped with polyethylene wrap, the umbilical cord is deliberately left long and kept moist, and the patient stabilized and transferred to the operating room. Then the Applied Alexis wound protector and retractor system (Applied Medical Resources Corp, USA) was used for reducing eviscerated bowel. Once all organs have been reduced, the wound protector and retractor system (WPAR) is removed and the abdominal wall defect covered with the umbilical cord without suturing. Tegaderm (3M Health Care, USA) is used as a film dressing and is removed once the umbilical cord becomes adhered.

RESULTS

We have used this technique to treat seven neonates with gastroschisis between April 2006 and March 2009. In three, WPAR was used as a silo initially, and removed after 3-4 days, and in four, WPAR was used only until primary reduction was achieved and removed. The abdominal defect closed spontaneously in all cases with excellent cosmesis. There were no complications attributed to our technique. At the time of discharge, all patients had insignificant umbilical hernias which have all resolved spontaneously.

CONCLUSION

The cosmetic appearance of the abdomen is improved using our technique compared with primary closure involving suturing and a conventional silo.

Ward reduction of gastroschisis in a single stage without general anaesthesia may increase the risk of short-term morbidities: results of a retrospective audit

BACKGROUND

 Ward reduction of gastroschisis in a single stage without the need for general inhalational anaesthesia (ward reduction) has been reported by some authors to be effective and safe. We introduced this practice to our neonatal unit 2 years ago.

AIM

To compare the short-term outcomes of this new practice with the standard procedure of reduction under general anaesthesia (GA).

METHODS

Retrospective case series of all infants with gastroschisis between January 2004 and January 2008.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven infants were managed with the traditional approach and 11 infants underwent ward reduction without GA. Infants in the ward reduction group had an increased frequency for all the three major adverse events (ischemic necrosis of bowel: 27.3% vs. 3.7%, odds ratio (OR) 10.72, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.72, 159.6; need for total parenteral nutrition (TPN) more than 60 days: 18% vs. 3.7%, OR 4.13, 95% CI: 0.28, 61.55; and unplanned return to theatre: 27.3% vs. 7.4%, OR 3.88, 95% CI: 0.44, 34.08), although none of these events reached statistical significance. There were no significant differences between the groups for the outcomes of time to reach full feeds, duration of hospital stay and number of days on antibiotics.

CONCLUSIONS

These results raise concerns over the role of ward reduction of gastroschisis in a single sitting without the use of GA. Randomised trials with appropriate design and sample size are needed before embracing this method as a standard practice.

Intestinal venous congestion as a complication of elective silo placement for gastroschisis

Use of a spring-loaded silastic silo has been advocated as a means of gentle reduction of the herniated bowel, while avoiding the possible complications of primary closure of gastroschisis. We recently encountered intestinal venous congestion during elective silo reduction of gastroschisis. Two babies with gastroschisis were treated postdelivery with a spring-loaded silo placed under the fascial defect and the eviscerated bowel suspended within the silo. Patient #1 had no bowel matting. On day of life 2, the bowel within the silo was noted to be dusky. The silo was removed, and the bowel was indeed congested, but viable. Complete reduction with a modified Bianchi closure was performed at the bedside. Patient #2 had severe matting of the bowel and did not require intubation for silo placement. As daily reductions progressed, the bowel was noted to be congested on day 2. On day 3, removal of the silo revealed frank bowel necrosis with impending perforation. Two-thirds of the small bowel required resection, leaving the child with short bowel. Venous congestion within a silo should be given prompt attention, including removal of the silo, as bowel infarction may result.

Gastroschisis: a third world perspective

PURPOSE

The incidence of gastroschisis is rising worldwide. In developed countries advances in neonatal intensive care (NICU) and the availability of total parenteral nutrition have improved survival for such patients, but in the third world mortality rates remain high. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of modern intensive care facilities on the mortality of babies with gastroschisis in Africa.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all neonates admitted with a diagnosis of gastroschisis at Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital in Durban over a 6-year period (2002-2007) was conducted.

RESULTS

A total of 106 babies with gastroschisis presented during the review period. The prevalence of gastroschisis amongst neonatal surgical admissions increased from 6% in 2003 to 15% in 2007. 72% of patients weighed less than 2.5 kg at birth and 64% were premature (<37 weeks gestation). 91% were "outborn" with 71% delivered vaginally. Median maternal age was 22.6 years and 57% of mothers were primiparous. Primary abdominal wall closure was possible in 74% of patients. The overall mortality was 43% with sepsis being the leading cause. Staged closure was associated with a higher mortality than primary closure.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of gastroschisis amongst neonatal surgical admissions appears to be increasing. Most babies were "outborn" resulting in delays in diagnosis and referral for surgical management. Despite the availability of NICU and total parenteral nutrition the mortality remains high. Reduction in mortality will depend upon improvements in antenatal diagnosis, primary care and transportation, as well as a reduction in postsurgical sepsis.

Contemporary postnatal surgical management strategies for congenital abdominal wall defects

Early definitive closure of abdominal wall defects is possible in most cases. Staged reduction does offer distinct advantages, and mortality and morbidity may be better. Risk stratification may produce outcome and tailor management of difficult cases in the form of a clinical pathway. Stem cell technology may, in the future, offer the ideal allogenic prosthesis in complex cases.

Routine use of a SILASTIC spring-loaded silo for infants with gastroschisis: a multicenter randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Retrospective studies have suggested that routine use of a preformed silo for infants with gastroschisis may be associated with improved outcomes. We performed a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial to test this hypothesis.

METHODS

Eligible infants were randomized to (1) routine bedside placement of a preformed Silastic spring-loaded silo, with gradual reduction and elective abdominal wall closure, or (2) primary closure.

RESULTS

There were 27 infants in each group. There was no significant difference between groups with respect to age, weight, sex, Apgar scores, prenatal diagnosis, or mode of delivery. The total number of days on the ventilator was lower in the spring-loaded silo group, although it did not reach statistical significance (3.2 vs 5.3, P = .07). There was no significant difference between groups with respect to length of time on total parenteral nutrition, length of stay, or incidence of sepsis and necrotizing enterocolitis.

CONCLUSION

Routine use of a preformed silo was associated with similar outcomes to primary closure for infants with gastroschisis but with a strong trend toward fewer days on the ventilator. Use of a preformed silo has the advantage of permitting definitive abdominal wall closure in a more elective setting.

Antenatal magnetic resonance imaging is useful in providing predictive values for surgical procedures in abdominal wall defects

BACKGROUND

Antenatal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is useful for the diagnosis of abdominal wall defects. Its predictive value concerning the possibility of primary closure of the abdominal wall, however, has so far not been reported.

METHODS

Between August 2001 and November 2004, antenatal MRI was performed on 9 patients with abdominal wall defects in whom surgical repair was performed immediately after birth. Areas of the abdominal cavity and exteriorized viscera were manually traced from both sagittal and axial MR images, and the data were further transmitted to a Workstation for MRI Volumetry (Advantage Windows 4.1, General Electric Medical Systems, Milwaukee, Wis). We examined the exteriorized ratio (ER), which is calculated by dividing the absolute volume of the abdominal cavity by that of the exteriorized viscera, and evaluated the predictive value by a retrospective comparison with surgical procedure.

RESULTS

In the primary closure group (n = 5), mean values of ER were 0.33 +/- 0.31 from axial and 0.45 +/- 0.31 from sagittal MR images. In contrast, in the staged closure group (n = 4), mean values of ER were 1.39 +/- 0.40 from axial and 1.34 +/- 0.42 from sagittal MR images. There was a significant difference (P < .05) between the 2 groups for both sets of images. The ER obtained from antenatal MRI correlated well with surgical procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

The ER might be useful for antenatal counseling, planning for delivery, and prediction of the most likely surgical procedure.

Experience of bedside preformed silo staged reduction and closure for gastroschisis

AIM

The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of routine staged reduction and closure at the bedside, using preformed silos with no general anesthesia (PSnoGA), compared to emergency operative fascial closure (OFC) under general anesthesia for gastroschisis (GS).

METHODS

A retrospective matched case-control analysis of neonates with GS was performed between 1990 and 2004 inclusively. Assessment included demographics, method of closure, days on ventilator, days to first enteral feed, days to full oral feeds, days on parenteral nutrition, length of hospital stay, and complications.

RESULTS

Sixty-five patients with GS were treated in our institution between 1990 and 2004. Thirty-five underwent OFC, 4 had Bianchi ward reduction, and 26 received PSnoGA. Seventeen patients with bowel perforation, atresia, ward reduction, medical complications necessitating ventilation, or any other condition requiring urgent surgical intervention were excluded from the analysis. Patients were well matched for gestation and birth weight. Forty-eight patients (OFC = 27 and PSnoGA = 21) were compared by using Mann-Whitney U test. Median days on ventilator (4 vs 0; P < or = .0001) was significantly reduced, but there was no difference for days to full oral feeds (26 vs 31; P = .26), days on parenteral nutrition (25 vs 30; P = .28), and length of stay (32 vs 36; P = .32), respectively. Complications were similar for both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

PSnoGA has outcomes statistically similar to OFC, although days on ventilator are significantly reduced. Slow reduction of the bowel avoids abdominal compartment syndrome and closure may be achieved without fascial sutures. PSnoGA is performed at the bedside and aims to avoid general anesthesia, a period of ventilation, and out-of-hours operating, thereby reducing costs. A prospective, multicenter, randomized control trial is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of PSnoGA.

Does gastroschisis reduction require general anesthesia? A comparative analysis

BACKGROUND

Outcome after gastroschisis repair without general anesthesia is controversial, and published conclusions are variable with no comparative studies.

AIM

The aim of this study was to present a comparative study evaluating outcome after gastroschisis repair with and without general anesthesia.

METHODS

An ambispective nonrandomized study of a cohort of 51 neonates born with gastroschisis between July 1998 and December 2003 was performed. Twenty-four neonates (group 1) had conventional reduction under general anesthesia, and 27 (group 2) cotside minimal intervention reductions were without general anesthesia.

RESULTS

Groups were comparable regarding gestational age, birth weight, and quality of eviscerated bowel. Statistical significance (P < .05) was seen between groups 1 and 2 with regard to age at reduction of gastroschisis (5.6 +/- 2.5 vs 3 +/- 1 hours) and time taken for completion of gastroschisis reduction (58.1 +/- 15 vs 49 +/- 14 minutes). No statistical significance (P > .05) was seen with respect to start of feeds (10.4 +/- 3.6 vs 10.9 +/- 4.1 days), duration of total parenteral nutrition (21.5 +/- 7.3 vs 22.4 +/- 6.8 days), and total hospital (stay 29 +/- 10 vs 30 +/- 13 days). Admission to the intensive care unit was required in 92% in group 1 for 1 to 6 days vs 7% in group 2 for 3 to 6 days. There was 1 death in group 1 (4%). Total hospital cost in group 1 was 12,283 pounds sterling +/- 2438 pounds sterling vs 6208 pounds sterling +/- 2120 pounds sterling in group 2 (P = .013).

CONCLUSIONS

Neonates with gastroschisis, whose bowel was reduced without general anesthesia, have similar outcomes to those whose bowel was reduced under general anesthesia. Both approaches appear to be safe and effective, but reduction without general anesthesia was cost-effective.

The perinatal management of gastroschisis

Gastroschisis is increasing in frequency and is becoming a common condition. It is now invariably detected antenatally and although the long-term outcome in the majority of cases is excellent, the existence of both fetal and postnatal complications has led to variations in practice to try to optimise outcome. This article reviews the evidence for some of these variations where such evidence exists and provides a contemporary view of best practice where it does not.

Effect of paralysis of the abdominal wall muscles by botulinum A toxin to intraabdominal pressure: an experimental study

PURPOSE

To show the effect of botulinum A toxin-induced paralysis of abdominal muscles on intraabdominal pressure.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Fifteen Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into 2 groups. An abdominal skin incision was done, and 2 catheters were placed for the pressure monitoring and saline infusion. Saline solution was given to the abdomen until reaching to a pressure level of 9 cm H2O and 6 mm Hg in pressure device, and the amounts of injected saline were recorded. Then intraabdominal saline was drained. Two milliliters (5 U/mL) botulinum A toxin was applied to the abdominal muscles in group 2. Saline was injected at the same points in same amounts in group 1. After 3 days, catheters were placed, and the saline volumes needed to obtain the same pressure levels were recorded for each rat. Spontaneous motor unit potential (MUP), single MUP analysis and interference patterns of the muscles, respiratory rates, and vascular pressure measurements were recorded before and after botulinum toxin (Botox) injections.

RESULTS

Mean intraabdominal saline volumes in the first and third days were 63.8 and 64.4 mL in group 1 and 67.6 and 80.6 mL in group 2, respectively. Mean MUP amplitude and duration of the rectus muscles in group 2 (17.1 microV and 1.47 milliseconds) were significantly lower than those of group 1 (187 microV and 4.9 milliseconds) in the third day. There were no pathological changes in respiratory rates and pressure measurements before and after Botox injections.

CONCLUSION

This pilot experimental study showed that local injection of botulinum A toxin causes paralysis in abdominal wall muscles, increases the intraabdominal volume, and decreases the pressure, and this application may be used as an adjunct in abdominal wall closure in selective cases.

Clinical analysis of congenital abdominal wall defects - omphalocele and gastroschisis

Introduction. This is a retrospective analysis of therapeutic approaches and treatment outcomes of congenital abdominal wall defects (omphalocele and gastroschisis) in a five year period. The aim of this study was to identify factors which can affect the prognosis of future therapeutic procedures. Material and methods. We evaluated 13 children, 7 with omphalocele (2 female/5 male; mean birth weight of 2862 g; mean gestational age of 37 weeks), and 6 patients with gastroschisis (2 female/4 male; mean birth weight of 2640 g; mean gestational age of 36/2 weeks). All patients were treated at the Clinic of Pediatric Surgeiyfrom 1999 to 2003. Results. In this study, thirteen cases of congenital abdominal wall defects (omphalocele and gastroschisis) were retrospectively investigated. All patients underwent prenatal ultrasound. Omphalocele was prenatally detected in 42.8% of fetuses, and gastroschisis in 16.7%. Coexisting anomalies were present in 57.1% of patients with omphalocele and in 16.7% of newborns with gastroschisis. Three patients with omphalocele were treated operatively, and four only conservatively. The abdominal wall of patients with gastroschisis was primarily closed in three patients. Two patients required a staged abdominal wall closure. One patient with gastroschisis and intestinal atresia underwent primary closure after partial intestinal resection and enterostomy. Based on these responses, a management protocol (algorithm) was recommended. The most common postoperative complication, in 7 cases of omphalocele, was mechanical ileus (n=l), whereas among patients with gastroschisis the commonest were mechanical ileus (n=l) and intestinal perforation (n=1). The mortality of patients with omphalocele was 52% and with gastroschisis 66.7%. Conclusion. A strategy designed to optimize antenatal and neonatal factors is expected to increase the survival rate of patients with abdominal wall defects. .

Gastroschisis reduction using "Applied Alexis", a wound protector and retractor

We used an Applied Alexis (Applied Medical Resources Corp, USA) wound protector and retractor (WPAR) instead of a "spring loaded silo" (SLS) for gastroschisis reduction because SLS is currently unavailable in Japan. Our patient was a 1,707 g female diagnosed prenatally with gastroschisis born at 35 weeks gestation by spontaneous vaginal delivery. Attempted primary closure failed and a WPAR was used as a silo. A piece of the bottom ring of the WPAR was cut out and a smaller ring was made from it, so it would fit into the patient's abdomen. Eviscerated organs were inserted into the retractor through the bottom ring, and the bottom ring was placed into the abdominal cavity through the gastroschisis defect without suturing to complete the silo. Operating time was 20 minutes. Three days later, all eviscerated organs had been reduced into the peritoneal cavity, the silo was removed, and the gastroschisis defect closed without difficulty. Postoperative recovery was uneventful and the WPAR was an excellent alternative for making a silo.

Gastroschisis: ward reduction compared with traditional reduction under general anesthesia

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

In gastroschisis it is proposed that gut reduction may be achieved without intubation or general anesthesia (GA) through ward reduction. The authors aimed to determine if ward reduction decreased morbidity and duration of treatment.

METHODS

Infants born from January 1, 1995, to December 31, 2001, with gastroschisis were managed with either reduction under GA in the operating theatre (OT group)--up to September 1999, or ward reduction (when eligible) in the neonatal unit without GA/ventilation (ward reduction [WR] group)--from September 1999.

RESULTS

Of the 37 infants, 31 were eligible for ward reduction-15 from the OT group, 16 from the WR group. All infants in the OT group had at least 1 episode of ventilation and 1 GA: 62% of infants in the WR group avoided ventilation (P = .0002) and 81% avoided GA (P < .0001). Infants who had ward reduction had significantly shorter durations of ventilation and oxygen therapy. Septicemia occurred in 31% of the WR group and 7% of the OT group (P = .17). Infants who had ward reduction left intensive care 16 days earlier (P = .02) and tended to reach full enteral feeds 8 days sooner (P = .06) and be discharged from hospital 15 days earlier (P = .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Infants who had ward reduction do better in terms of avoiding GA/ventilation, establishing feeds, and going home earlier. A randomized, controlled trial comparing the 2 approaches is feasible, safe, and worthwhile.