Experience with the copper 7 intrauterine device in an adolescent population

Pooled incidence of continuation and pregnancy rates of four contraceptive methods in young women: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Continuation rates of contraceptive methods in young women vary among studies, and there is scarce data regarding the pregnancy rate in this population.

METHODS

Four independently systematic searches were performed in PUBMED, EMBASE, LILACS, and Cochrane databases from inception until January 2021 for oral contraceptive pill (OCP), copper IUD, levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS), and subdermal implant. Inclusion criteria were observational or RCT studies that reported continuation for at least 12 months and/or pregnancy rate of these contraceptives methods in girls aged 22 years old or younger. Two authors extracted data from the study design and the outcomes. Pooled proportions of each method were applied using the inverse variance in all calculations with LOGIT transformation, using the random-effects model. Cochrane collaboration tool and New Castle-Ottawa were used to assess the quality and bias of all included studies. GRADE criteria evaluated the quality of evidence.

RESULTS

Continuation rate for OCP was 51% (95%CI 34%-68%), while for cooper IUD was 77% (95%CI 74%-80%), LNG-IUS 84% (95%CI 80%-87%), and implant 85% (95%CI 81%-88%). The pooled estimated pregnancy rate for OCP was 11% (95%CI 6%-20%), while for cooper IUD was 5% (95%CI 3%-7%), LNG-IUS 1.6% (95%CI 1.2%-2.3%), and implant 1.8% (95%CI 0.4%-8.4%).

CONCLUSION

Long-acting contraceptive methods presented higher continuation rates and lower pregnancy rates when compared to OCPs.

Use of intrauterine contraceptive devices in nulliparous women: personal experience over a 12-year period

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the use of intrauterine contraceptive devices (IUDs) in nulliparous women compared to their use in parous women.

METHODS

A comparative cross-sectional study was carried out to determine the reasons for removal of IUDs inserted between 1985 and 1996 in a sample of 227 nulliparous women and 2080 parous women. The statistical analysis was performed using the chi 2 test; the differences were considered to be significant when p < 0.05.

RESULTS

The reasons for removal of IUDs in the two groups were: expiry, 49.1% in the nulliparous group vs. 48.2% in the parous group; planned pregnancy, 21.7% vs. 15.4%; accidental pregnancy, 4.8% vs. 6.3%; expulsion, 1.6% vs. 5.1%; pelvic inflammatory disease, 1.6% vs. 1.1%; pain and/or bleeding, 14.5% vs. 10.2%; other, 6.4% vs. 6.3%; vasectomy or tubal sterilization, 0% vs. 7%.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that nulliparity is not a contraindication for the use of an IUD, and that the use of an IUD in nulliparous women is as safe and effective as in parous women.

A cohort study of Norplant implant: side-effects and acceptance

OBJECTIVES

Menstrual irregularity is the main cause of termination of Norplant use; a study of its safety and level of acceptance is needed.

STUDY METHODS

A cohort study using medical records of Dr Kariadi Hospital, Semarang, Indonesia and interviews between Norplant and IUD users who had in 1993 been followed-up for 5 years. Expulsion rate, removal rate, level of acceptance and satisfaction were examined.

RESULTS

From 170 Norplant and 168 IUD acceptors, the net cumulative pregnancy rates by month 36 of the Norplant and the IUD groups were 0.0% and 1.19%, respectively (p > 0.05). The net cumulative expulsion rates were 0.61% and 1.32% (p > 0.05). The net cumulative rates of removal for medical reasons were 2.37% and 1.97% (p > 0.05). The net cumulative removal rates for non-medical reasons were 1.80% and 10.38% (p < 0.001); the net cumulative continuation rates were 95.29% and 85.60% (p < 0.002). The net cumulative acceptance rates were 97.04% and 93.83% (p > 0.05). The Norplant users experienced less menstrual and inter-menstrual bleeding and more amenorrhea than the IUD group. The psychological satisfaction scores among the Norplant and IUD users were high (p > 0.05). The Norplant contraceptive is well accepted.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings could be very useful for further steps in promoting Norplant as a contraceptive that is long-acting, with good efficacy, acceptance, and safety.

Intrauterine devices in nulliparous women

The majority of studies on the clinical events following the insertion of an intrauterine device for contraception have observed a higher frequency of adverse effects in nulliparous women. In this review, the significance of nulliparity on the occurrence of medical removal for bleeding and pain, expulsion and pelvic inflammatory disease is estimated. The possible role of the anatomy of the pregravid uterus is discussed, and results obtained through a selective measurement of the endometrial cavity in a population of nulligravidas is presented. It is concluded that IUDs should not be the first choice of contraception in nulliparous women because of an increased risk of long-term adverse effects. The relationship between the length of the intrauterine device and the length of the endometrial cavity does not seem to be of clinical significance for the performance of IUDs in nulliparous women.

Copper IUDs, PID, and fertility in nulliparous women

Some authors have suggested that use of IUDs (intrauterine contraceptive devices) in nulliparous women should be contraindicated because of the risk for PID (pelvic inflammatory disease); others have found nulliparous women to be suitable candidates for IUD use. Clinical studies of copper IUDs in which parous and nulliparous women have been compared with regard to risk of PID often point to young age as a risk factor, regardless of parity. Vital statistics of PID rates also show this trend. An overall PID rate of 1.49/100 woman-years (WY) was calculated from data contained in 28 of the clinical studies reviewed in this paper. These studies included 25,674 women, of whom 42.5% were nulliparous. Studies of fertility following use of copper IUDs indicate that fertility is not impaired by their use.

Adolescent contraception: nonhormonal methods

A comparison of the advantages, disadvantages, and costs of each method is presented in Table 1. Barrier methods of contraception offer adolescents protection against both pregnancy and STDs, but innovative approaches are needed to enhance availability and acceptability. Condom use in conjunction with a vaginal spermicide would provide optimal protection. The "female condom" may prove to be an effective alternative. Diaphragms and cervical caps can be prescribed for well-educated, highly motivated adolescents comfortable with insertion and removal. The vaginal contraceptive sponge provides many of the advantages of the diaphragm and cap without the need for an examination and fitting and also may be used as a backup method with the condom. Vaginal spermicides used alone are significantly less effective than in combination with a mechanical barrier. The IUD is not considered appropriate for most adolescents due to its association with an increased risk of pelvic infection. Periodic abstinence requires accurate identification of the fertile period, extensive education, and partner cooperation. Sterilization is rarely considered an option in adolescents. Alternate forms of sexual expression are available to adolescents who choose to abstain from intercourse.