Lower cardiac troponin T levels in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass and receiving high-dose aprotinin therapy indicate reduction of perioperative myocardial damage

Aprotinin Reduces Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in the Retina of Guinea Pigs

Purpose

The aim of this study was investigate the role of aprotinin on retinal lipid peroxidation and histopathological changes during ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) of guinea pigs.

Methods

Three groups of seven pigmented guinea pigs each were formed: a control (group 1), ischemia/saline (group 2) and ischemia/aprotinin (group 3). One eye of each animal was selected for histopathological evaluation and the other for biochemical assay. Bilateral pressure-induced retinal ischemia was instigated for 90 min and was followed by 24 hours of reperfusion. Animals in the ischemia/aprotinin and ischemia/saline groups received either 20,000 KIU/kg of aprotinin or saline, repeated four times at 6-hour intervals, with the first dose administered 5 min prior to the ischemic insult. The animals were killed at 24 hours of reperfusion. Retinal malondialdehyde (MDA) levels and the thickness of the inner plexiform layers were measured.

Results

The level of MDA in group 1 was significantly (p<0.001) lower than the other groups. The mean MDA level in group 2 was significantly (p<0.01) higher than in group 3. The inner plexiform layer in group 1 was significantly (p<0.001) thinner than in the other groups. The mean thickness of the inner plexiform layer in group 2 was significantly (p<0.01) higher than in group 3.

Conclusions

These data indicate that intraperitoneally administrated aprotinin has a protective effect against I/R injury in the retina of guinea pig as evidenced by reduced retinal MDA level and retinal thickness.

Leukocyte filtration and aprotinin: synergistic anti-inflammatory protection

Cardiopulmonary bypass activates an array of cellular and humoral inflammatory mechanisms that culminate in diverse or organ-specific injury. A manifestation of inflammatory injury to the heart, atrial fibrillation ranks among the most frequent and potentially life-threatening postsurgical complications. Pulmonary manifestations of the inflammatory response are also of major concern. Neutrophils activated by passage through the extracorporeal circuit inflict local injury and provoke the inflammatory cascade by producing oxyradicals and proinflammatory factors. This study tested if a combination of leukocyte depletion and aprotinin suppression of neutrophils could minimize postbypass atrial fibrillation and pulmonary dysfunction. In part one, two randomized groups of 90 patients undergoing primary coronary artery bypass grafting received full Hammersmith aprotinin alone (control group) or combined with leukofiltration (study group) and were prospectively examined. The dual treatment decreased the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation (7 of 90, 7.8%) by 67% versus aprotinin alone (21 of 90, 23.3%). Respiratory gas exchange in these patients was assessed from pulmonary shunt fraction. In the first two hours postbypass, pulmonary shunt fraction in the dual treatment group increased 40% less than in the group receiving aprotinin alone (p = 0.002), and subsided more quickly and completely over the next six hours. In part two, the cardiopulmonary bypass group receiving aprotinin+leukofiltration was retrospectively compared with 45 patients undergoing off-pump coronary revascularization. A strong, albeit not statistically significant trend (p= 0.08) toward a lower incidence of atrial fibrillation was found in the dual treatment group versus the off-pump group (8 of 45, 17.8%). These findings suggest that combining mechanical and pharmacologic suppression of the systemic inflammatory response could mitigate its deleterious arrhythmic and pulmonary complications.

Randomized controlled trials of aprotinin in cardiac surgery: could clinical equipoise have stopped the bleeding?

Background Aprotinin is a serine protease inhibitor used to limit perioperative bleeding and reduce the need for donated blood transfusions during cardiac surgery. Randomized controlled trials of aprotinin evaluating its effect on the outcome of perioperative transfusion have been published since 1987, and systematic reviews were conducted in 1992 and 1997.

Methods A systematic search was conducted for all RCTs of aprotinin that used placebo controls or were open-label with no active control treatment. Data collected included the primary outcome, objective of each study, whether a systematic review was cited or conducted as part of the background and/or rationale for the study and the number of previously published RCTs cited. Cumulative meta-analyses were performed.

Results Sixty-four randomized, controlled trials of aprotinin were found, conducted between 1987 and 2002, reporting an endpoint of perioperative transfusion. Median trial size was 64 subjects, with a range of 20 to 1784. A cumulative meta-analysis indicated that aprotinin greatly decreased the need for perioperative transfusion, stabilizing at an odds ratio of 0.25 (p, 10 2 6) by the 12th study, published in June of 1992. The upper limit of the confidence interval never exceeded 0.65 and results were similar in all subgroups. Citation of previous RCTs was extremely low, with a median of 20% of prior trials cited. Only 7 of 44 (15%) of subsequent reports referenced the largest trial (N 1/4 1784), which was 28 times larger than the median trial size.

Conclusions This study demonstrates that investigators evaluating aprotinin were not adequately citing previous research, resulting in a large number of RCTs being conducted to address efficacy questions that prior trials had already definitively answered. Institutional review boards and journals could reduce the number of redundant trials by requiring investigators to conduct adequate searches for prior evidence and conducting systematic reviews.

The Inflammatory Response to Cardiopulmonary Bypass— Should It Be Treated?

Proinflammatory cytokines, including tumor necrosis factor (TNF) α and the interieukins, are important in the metabolic response to injury or infection. Although the importance of cytokine release during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is not fully appreciated, increasing num bers of publications present evidence that cytokine release during CPB is detrimental. In addition, endoge nous inhibitors of cytokine function, including TNF-sol uble receptor and interleukin 1 receptor antagonist, are released in response to elevated proinflammatory cyto kine levels during and after CPB. The involvement of these endogenous inhibitors in the pathophysiology of proinflammatory cytokine-induced solid organ injury after CPB remains to be defined.

Plasma Troponin Levels after Cardiac Surgery vs after Myocardial Infarction

Raised plasma troponin, a diagnostic marker for myocardial infarction, usually occurs after cardiac surgery, leading to difficulties in diagnosing postoperative myocardial infarction. To ascertain whether the same processes influence troponin elevation in both conditions, a literature search was performed for plasma troponin elimination curves after myocardial infarction, myocardial infarction with reperfusion, and cardiac surgery. From 70 studies, 11 curves using the Stratus immunoassay kit were analyzed: 5 post-cardiac surgery (412 patients), 2 after myocardial infarction with reperfusion (169 patients), and 4 after myocardial infarction (640 patients). For each group, a new plot was formulated from the mean troponin level at each time interval. While the up-slope of the cardiac surgery curve was much steeper than that of myocardial infarction, resembling that of myocardial infarction with reperfusion, its down-slope was significantly more gentle than that of both other groups (−0.91 vs −5.31, t = 3.47, df = 8, p < 0.01). This suggests that postoperative troponin elevation involves enhanced cell permeability as seen after ischemia reperfusion rather than permanent cellular damage. The gentler down-slope may point to surgery-induced impaired troponin removal from the circulation. Due to the different mechanisms proposed, implications from post-myocardial infarction troponin levels may not be conferred on post-cardiac surgery patients.

Using next-generation RNA sequencing to examine ischemic changes induced by cold blood cardioplegia on the human left ventricular myocardium transcriptome

BACKGROUND

The exact mechanisms that underlie the pathological processes of myocardial ischemia in humans are unclear. Cardiopulmonary bypass with cardioplegic arrest allows the authors to examine the whole transcriptional profile of human left ventricular myocardium at baseline and after exposure to cold cardioplegia-induced ischemia as a human ischemia model.

METHODS

The authors obtained biopsies from 45 patients undergoing aortic valve replacement surgery at baseline and after an average of 79 min of cold cardioplegic arrest. Samples were RNA sequenced and analyzed with the Partek Genomics Suite (Partek Inc., St. Louis, MO) for differential expression. Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (Ingenuity Systems, Redwood City, CA) and Biobase ExPlain (Biobase GmbH, Wolfenbuettel, Germany) systems were used for functional and pathway analyses.

RESULTS

Of the 4,098 genes with a mean expression value greater than 5, 90% were down-regulated and 9.1% were up-regulated. Of those, 1,241 were significantly differentially expressed. Gene ontology analysis revealed significant down-regulation in immune inflammatory response and complement activation categories and highly consistent was the down-regulation of intelectin 1, proteoglycan, and secretory leukocyte peptidase inhibitor. Up-regulated genes of interest were FBJ murine osteosarcoma viral oncogene homolog and the hemoglobin genes hemoglobin α1 (HBA1) and hemoglobin β. In addition, analysis of transcription factor-binding sites revealed interesting targets in factors regulating reactive oxygen species production, apoptosis, immunity, cytokine production, and inflammatory response.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors have shown that the human left ventricle exhibits significant changes in gene expression in response to cold cardioplegia-induced ischemia during cardiopulmonary bypass, which provides great insight into the pathophysiology of ventricular ischemia, and thus, may help guide efforts to reduce myocardial damage during surgery.

Anti-fibrinolytic use for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion

BACKGROUND

Concerns regarding the safety of transfused blood have led to the development of a range of interventions to minimise blood loss during major surgery. Anti-fibrinolytic drugs are widely used, particularly in cardiac surgery, and previous reviews have found them to be effective in reducing blood loss, the need for transfusion, and the need for re-operation due to continued or recurrent bleeding. In the last few years questions have been raised regarding the comparative performance of the drugs. The safety of the most popular agent, aprotinin, has been challenged, and it was withdrawn from world markets in May 2008 because of concerns that it increased the risk of cardiovascular complications and death.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the comparative effects of the anti-fibrinolytic drugs aprotinin, tranexamic acid (TXA), and epsilon aminocaproic acid (EACA) on blood loss during surgery, the need for red blood cell (RBC) transfusion, and adverse events, particularly vascular occlusion, renal dysfunction, and death.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched: the Cochrane Injuries Group's Specialised Register (July 2010), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library 2010, Issue 3), MEDLINE (Ovid SP) 1950 to July 2010, EMBASE (Ovid SP) 1980 to July 2010. References in identified trials and review articles were checked and trial authors were contacted to identify any additional studies. The searches were last updated in July 2010.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of anti-fibrinolytic drugs in adults scheduled for non-urgent surgery. Eligible trials compared anti-fibrinolytic drugs with placebo (or no treatment), or with each other.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. This version of the review includes a sensitivity analysis excluding trials authored by Prof. Joachim Boldt.

MAIN RESULTS

This review summarises data from 252 RCTs that recruited over 25,000 participants. Data from the head-to-head trials suggest an advantage of aprotinin over the lysine analogues TXA and EACA in terms of reducing perioperative blood loss, but the differences were small. Compared to control, aprotinin reduced the probability of requiring RBC transfusion by a relative 34% (relative risk [RR] 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.60 to 0.72). The RR for RBC transfusion with TXA was 0.61 (95% CI 0.53 to 0.70) and was 0.81 (95% CI 0.67 to 0.99) with EACA. When the pooled estimates from the head-to-head trials of the two lysine analogues were combined and compared to aprotinin alone, aprotinin appeared more effective in reducing the need for RBC transfusion (RR 0.90; 95% CI 0.81 to 0.99).Aprotinin reduced the need for re-operation due to bleeding by a relative 54% (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.62). This translates into an absolute risk reduction of 2% and a number needed-to-treat (NNT) of 50 (95% CI 33 to 100). A similar trend was seen with EACA (RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.99) but not TXA (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.17). The blood transfusion data were heterogeneous and funnel plots indicate that trials of aprotinin and the lysine analogues may be subject to publication bias.When compared with no treatment aprotinin did not increase the risk of myocardial infarction (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.11), stroke (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.52), renal dysfunction (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.54) or overall mortality (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.06). Similar trends were seen with the lysine analogues, but data were sparse. These data conflict with the results of recently published non-randomised studies, which found increased risk of cardiovascular complications and death with aprotinin. There are concerns about the adequacy of reporting of uncommon events in the small clinical trials included in this review.When aprotinin was compared directly with either, or both, of the two lysine analogues it resulted in a significant increase in the risk of death (RR 1.39, 95% CI 1.02, 1.89), and a non-significant increase in the risk of myocardial infarction (RR 1.11 95% CI 0.82, 1.50). Most of the data contributing to this added risk came from a single study - the BART trial (2008).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Anti-fibrinolytic drugs provide worthwhile reductions in blood loss and the receipt of allogeneic red cell transfusion. Aprotinin appears to be slightly more effective than the lysine analogues in reducing blood loss and the receipt of blood transfusion. However, head to head comparisons show a lower risk of death with lysine analogues when compared with aprotinin. The lysine analogues are effective in reducing blood loss during and after surgery, and appear to be free of serious adverse effects.

Anti-fibrinolytic use for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion

BACKGROUND

Concerns regarding the safety of transfused blood have led to the development of a range of interventions to minimise blood loss during major surgery. Anti-fibrinolytic drugs are widely used, particularly in cardiac surgery, and previous reviews have found them to be effective in reducing blood loss, the need for transfusion, and the need for re-operation due to continued or recurrent bleeding. In the last few years questions have been raised regarding the comparative performance of the drugs. The safety of the most popular agent, aprotinin, has been challenged, and it was withdrawn from world markets in May 2008 because of concerns that it increased the risk of cardiovascular complications and death.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the comparative effects of the anti-fibrinolytic drugs aprotinin, tranexamic acid (TXA), and epsilon aminocaproic acid (EACA) on blood loss during surgery, the need for red blood cell (RBC) transfusion, and adverse events, particularly vascular occlusion, renal dysfunction, and death.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched: the Cochrane Injuries Group's Specialised Register (July 2010), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library 2010, Issue 3), MEDLINE (Ovid SP) 1950 to July 2010, EMBASE (Ovid SP) 1980 to July 2010. References in identified trials and review articles were checked and trial authors were contacted to identify any additional studies. The searches were last updated in July 2010.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of anti-fibrinolytic drugs in adults scheduled for non-urgent surgery. Eligible trials compared anti-fibrinolytic drugs with placebo (or no treatment), or with each other.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

This review summarises data from 252 RCTs that recruited over 25,000 participants. Data from the head-to-head trials suggest an advantage of aprotinin over the lysine analogues TXA and EACA in terms of reducing perioperative blood loss, but the differences were small. Compared to control, aprotinin reduced the probability of requiring RBC transfusion by a relative 34% (relative risk [RR] 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.60 to 0.72). The RR for RBC transfusion with TXA was 0.61 (95% CI 0.53 to 0.70) and was 0.81 (95% CI 0.67 to 0.99) with EACA. When the pooled estimates from the head-to-head trials of the two lysine analogues were combined and compared to aprotinin alone, aprotinin appeared more effective in reducing the need for RBC transfusion (RR 0.90; 95% CI 0.81 to 0.99).Aprotinin reduced the need for re-operation due to bleeding by a relative 54% (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.62). This translates into an absolute risk reduction of 2% and a number needed-to-treat (NNT) of 50 (95% CI 33 to 100). A similar trend was seen with EACA (RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.99) but not TXA (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.17). The blood transfusion data were heterogeneous and funnel plots indicate that trials of aprotinin and the lysine analogues may be subject to publication bias.When compared with no treatment aprotinin did not increase the risk of myocardial infarction (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.11), stroke (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.52), renal dysfunction (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.54) or overall mortality (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.06). Similar trends were seen with the lysine analogues, but data were sparse. These data conflict with the results of recently published non-randomised studies, which found increased risk of cardiovascular complications and death with aprotinin. There are concerns about the adequacy of reporting of uncommon events in the small clinical trials included in this review.When aprotinin was compared directly with either, or both, of the two lysine analogues it resulted in a significant increase in the risk of death (RR 1.39, 95% CI 1.02, 1.89), and a non-significant increase in the risk of myocardial infarction (RR 1.11 95% CI 0.82, 1.50). Most of the data contributing to this added risk came from a single study - the BART trial (2008).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Anti-fibrinolytic drugs provide worthwhile reductions in blood loss and the receipt of allogeneic red cell transfusion. Aprotinin appears to be slightly more effective than the lysine analogues in reducing blood loss and the receipt of blood transfusion. However, head to head comparisons show a lower risk of death with lysine analogues when compared with aprotinin. The lysine analogues are effective in reducing blood loss during and after surgery, and appear to be free of serious adverse effects.

Tranexamic acid and aprotinin in primary cardiac operations: an analysis of 220 cardiac surgical patients treated with tranexamic acid or aprotinin

BACKGROUND

Antifibrinolytics are widely used in cardiac surgery to reduce bleeding. Allogeneic blood transfusion, even in primary cardiac operations with low blood loss, is still high. In the present study we evaluated the impact of tranexamic acid compared to aprotinin on the transfusion incidence in cardiac surgical patients with low risk of bleeding.

METHODS

This prospective, randomized, double-blind study included 220 patients undergoing primary coronary artery revascularization (coronary artery bypass grafting [CABG]) or aortic valve replacement (AVR). Randomized in blocks of 20, patients received either tranexamic acid (approximately 6 g) or full-dose aprotinin (approximately 5-6 x 10(6) Kallikrein Inhibiting Units). Transfusion was guided by a strict transfusion algorithm. Molecular markers of hemostasis were determined to assess differences in the mode of action of the two drugs. Primary end-points were the incidence of allogeneic red cell transfusion and 24-h postoperative blood loss. Data were analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle and compared using the chi(2) and Mann-Whitney U-test.

RESULTS

Two-hundred-twenty patients were enrolled (CABG: 134, AVR: 86). In the aprotinin Group 47% of patients received allogeneic blood during the hospital stay as compared to 61% in the tranexamic acid group (P = 0.036). Aprotinin conferred a 23% reduction in allogeneic transfusion risk (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.53-0.88). Overall, no significant difference in postoperative bleeding was observed, although 24-h blood loss was reduced in aprotinin-treated CABG patients (500, 350-750 mL vs 650, 475-875 mL (median, 25th-75th percentile); P = 0.039). Despite the lower transfusion rate, the hemoglobin concentration on the first postoperative day was higher in the aprotinin group (11.3, 9.9-12.1 vs 10.6, 9.9-11.6 mg/dL; P = 0.023). The fibrinolytic activity at the end of operation determined by D-Dimer was comparable in both groups. (0.15, 0.11-0.17 mg/L [aprotinin] versus 0.18, 0.12-0.24 mg/L [tranexamic acid]). The activated partial thromboplastin time was prolonged up to 4 h postoperatively in the aprotinin group, while the heparin requirement was reduced: 19% of the patients in the aprotinin group and 45% in the tranexamic acid group received at least one additional bolus heparin during cardiopulmonary bypass (P < 0.001). Troponin T levels postoperatively and on postoperative day 1 were significantly higher in the tranexamic acid group (P = 0.017). No differences in renal, cardiac, or mortality outcomes were observed.

CONCLUSION

Considering the rate of transfusion of red blood cells, tranexamic acid was slightly inferior in patients undergoing CABG, but there was no difference in patients receiving AVR. Tranexamic acid seems to be less effective in operations with increased bleeding such as CABG. Clinical benefit depends on specific patient and institution characteristics (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00396760).

Safety aspects of aprotinin therapy in cardiac surgery patients

Aprotinin is the only agent with Class A Level 1 evidence for reduction in rates of transfusion and return to operating theatre to control bleeding after heart surgery. Principal on the list of safety issues raised over the years are increased risk for: a) thrombosis; and b) renal dysfunction. With multiple administrations, hypersensitivity reactions have emerged as a further safety concern. This review discusses these issues, based on the examination of > 500 published articles. The article also specifically places in context the data presented recently from the observational McSPI database analysis. This report suggested that aprotinin should be withdrawn from human use as serious safety issues have been ignored or missed, an inference not in agreement with the majority of the human safety literature.

Anti-fibrinolytic use for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion

BACKGROUND

Concerns regarding the safety of transfused blood have led to the development of a range of interventions to minimise blood loss during major surgery. Anti-fibrinolytic drugs are widely used, particularly in cardiac surgery and previous reviews have found them to be effective in reducing blood loss and the need for transfusion. Recently, questions have been raised regarding the comparative performance of the drugs and the safety of the most popular agent, aprotinin.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the comparative effects of the anti-fibrinolytic drugs aprotinin, tranexamic acid (TXA), and epsilon aminocaproic acid (EACA) on blood loss during surgery, the need for red blood (RBC) transfusion, and adverse events, particularly vascular occlusion, renal dysfunction, and death.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the internet. References in identified trials and review articles were checked and trial authors were contacted to identify any additional studies. The searches were last updated in July 2006.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of anti-fibrinolytic drugs in adults scheduled for non-urgent surgery. Eligible trials compared anti-fibrinolytic drugs with placebo (or no treatment), or with each other.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

This review summarises data from 211 RCTs that recruited 20,781 participants. Data from placebo/inactive controlled trials, and from head-to-head trials suggest an advantage of aprotinin over the lysine analogues TXA and EACA in terms of operative blood loss, but the differences were small. Aprotinin reduced the probability of requiring RBC transfusion by a relative 34% (relative risk [RR] 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.61 to 0.71). The RR for RBC transfusion with TXA was 0.61 (95% CI 0.54 to 0.69) and it was 0.75 (95% CI 0.58 to 0.96) with EACA. When the pooled estimates from the head-to-head trials of the two lysine analogues were combined and compared to aprotinin alone, aprotinin appeared superior in reducing the need for RBC transfusion: RR 0.83 (95% CI 0.69 to 0.99). Aprotinin reduced the need for re-operation due to bleeding: RR 0.48 (95% CI 0.35 to 0.68). This translates into an absolute risk reduction of just under 3% and a number needed-to-treat (NNT) of 37 (95% CI 27 to 56). Similar trends were seen with TXA and EACA, but the data were sparse and the differences failed to reach statistical significance. The blood transfusion data were heterogeneous and funnel plots indicate that trials of aprotinin and the lysine analogues may be subject to publication bias. Evidence of publication bias was not observed in trials reporting re-operation rates. Adjustment for these effects reduced the magnitude of estimated benefits but did not negate treatment effects. However, the apparent advantage of aprotinin over the lysine analogues was small and may be explained by publication bias and non-equivalent drug doses. Aprotinin did not increase the risk of myocardial infarction (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.18), stroke (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.64) renal dysfunction (RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.70) or overall mortality (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.20). The analyses of myocardial infarction and death included data from the majority of subjects recruited into the clinical trials of aprotinin. However, under-reporting of renal events could explain the lack of effect seen with aprotinin. Similar trends were seen with the lysine analogues but data were sparse. These results conflict with the results of recently published non-randomised studies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Anti-fibrinolytic drugs provide worthwhile reductions in blood loss and the need for allogeneic red cell transfusion. Based on the results of randomised trials their efficacy does not appear to be offset by serious adverse effects. In most circumstances the lysine analogues are probably as effective as aprotinin and are cheaper; the evidence is stronger for tranexamic acid than for aminocaproic acid. In high risk cardiac surgery, where there is a substantial probability of serious blood loss, aprotinin may be preferred over tranexamic acid. Aprotinin does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of vascular occlusion and death, but the data do not exclude an increased risk of renal failure. There is no need for further placebo-controlled trials of aprotinin or lysine analogues in cardiac surgery. The principal need is for large comparative trials to assess the relative efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of anti-fibrinolytic drugs in different surgical procedures.

Efficacy and safety of aprotinin use for reoperative valvular surgery

BACKGROUND

Preservation of the hemostatic system during cardiac surgery is a main concern, primarily after repeated cardiac operations.

METHODS

We compared the outcomes of adult patients undergoing isolated reoperative valvular surgery receiving full-dose of aprotinin (redo group, n = 70) with patients experiencing primary isolated valvular surgery not receiving aprotinin (primary group, n = 135).

RESULTS

The mean age was lower in the redo group (45 +/- 14 years vs 50 +/- 17 years, p = 0.036). The redo group had more female patients (73% vs 51%, p = 0.003), patients in functional class IV (15% vs 4% p = 0.009), and patients with chronic atrial fibrillation (48% vs 24%, p = 0.001). The cardiopulmonary bypass duration was longer in the redo group (119 +/- 50 minutes vs 103 +/- 41 minutes, p = 0.014). However, the blood loss was significantly lower (300 +/- 279 mL vs 776 +/- 584 mL, p = 0.001) and fewer patients needed transfusions (3.0% vs 13%, p = 0.023) in the redo group. The postoperative morbidity was similar in both groups. The postoperative in-hospital mortality was 7% in the primary group and 10% in the redo group (p = 0.419). Factors associated with postoperative in-hospital mortality were the following: age greater than 60 years (p = 0.040, odds ratio [OR] 3.0), New York Heart Association class IV (p = 0.022, OR 5.0), preoperative critical state (p < 0.001, OR 12), emergent operation (p = 0.012, OR 7.0), endocarditis (p = 0.004, OR 10.0), and reoperation due to mechanical mitral prosthesis dysfunction (p = 0.009, OR 7).

CONCLUSIONS

The mortality and morbidity in redo valve surgery with aprotinin administration was comparable with primary valve surgery without aprotinin. Bleeding and transfusion requirements were significantly lower in redo patients receiving aprotinin.

Meta-analysis comparing the effectiveness and adverse outcomes of antifibrinolytic agents in cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND

Since the 1980s, antifibrinolytic therapies have assisted surgical teams in reducing the amount of blood loss. To date, however, serious questions remain regarding the safety and effectiveness of these agents.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We conducted a meta-analysis to compare aprotinin, epsilon-aminocaproic acid, and tranexamic acid with placebo and head to head on 8 clinical outcomes from 138 trials. Published randomized controlled trial data were collected from OVID/PubMed. Outcomes included total blood loss, transfusion of packed red blood cells, reexploration, mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, dialysis-dependent renal failure, and renal dysfunction (0.5-mg/dL increase in creatinine from baseline). All agents were effective in significantly reducing blood loss by 226 to 348 mL and the proportion of patients transfused with packed red blood cells over placebo. Only high-dose aprotinin reduced the rate of reexploration (relative risk, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.73). There were no significant risks or benefits for any agent for mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, or renal failure. However, high-dose aprotinin significantly increased the risk of renal dysfunction (relative risk, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.12 to 1.94), 12.9% versus 8.4%. Compared head to head, high-dose aprotinin demonstrated significant reduction in total blood loss over epsilon-aminocaproic acid (-184 mL; 95% CI, -256 to -112) and tranexamic acid (-195 mL; 95% CI, -286 to -105). There were no significant differences among any agent when compared head to head on other outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

All antifibrinolytic agents were effective in reducing blood loss and transfusion. There were no significant risks or benefits for mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, or renal failure. However, high-dose aprotinin was associated with a statistically significant increased risk of renal dysfunction.

Aprotinin reduces cardiac troponin I release and inhibits apoptosis of polymorphonuclear cells during off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery

OBJECTIVES

In addition to blood-sparing effects, aprotinin may have cardioprotective and anti-inflammatory effects during cardiopulmonary bypass-assisted cardiac surgery. In this study, the authors examined whether aprotinin had cardioprotective and/or anti-inflammatory effects in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.

DESIGN

A prospective randomized clinical trial.

SETTING

University hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Fifty patients were randomized to control (n = 25) or aprotinin treatment (n = 25) groups.

INTERVENTIONS

Aprotinin was given as a loading dose (2 x 10(6) KIU) followed by a continuous infusion at 5 x 10(5) KIU/h until skin closure.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Blood samples for cardiac troponin I; interleukin-6, interleukin-8, and interleukin-10; tumor necrosis factor alpha; and elastase were taken after anesthesia induction, completion of revascularization, and 6 hours, 12 hours, and 24 hours after revascularization. Blood samples were taken to assess for apoptosis in polymorphonuclear cells. Baseline plasma levels for cardiac troponin I did not differ between groups but were significantly lower in aprotinin-treated patients at the time of revascularization (p = 0.03) and 6 hours (p = 0.004) and 24 hours (p = 0.03) later. Aprotinin significantly reduced apoptosis in polymorphonuclear cells compared with control-treated patients (p = 0.04). There were no differences in plasma cytokine or elastase levels between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors conclude that aprotinin reduces perioperative cardiac troponin I release and attenuates apoptosis in polymorphonuclear cells but has no significant effects on plasma cytokine levels in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Is There Still a Role for Aprotinin in Cardiac Surgery?

Cardiac surgery is associated with a systemic inflammatory response and systemic coagulopathy, which can result in significant organ dysfunction and bleeding. Aprotinin, a serine protease inhibitor, can limit systemic inflammation, and has been associated with myocardial, pulmonary and cerebral protection in addition to its proven haemostatic efficacy. Data are currently conflicting regarding the haemostatic efficacy of aprotinin relative to alternative agents including tranexamic acid. Recent studies have demonstrated aprotinin usage is associated with increased rates of thrombotic and renal complications, but these findings are at odds with the majority of studies relating to aprotinin safety to date. The lack of adequately powered, randomised studies evaluating aprotinin and alternative agents limits drawing conclusions about the complete use or disuse of aprotinin presently and requires individualised patient selection based on bleeding risk and co-morbidities for its usage.

Cardioprotective effect of aprotinin on myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury during cardiopulmonary bypass

BACKGROUND

Aprotinin is a serine protease inhibitor used extensively in cardiac operations to reduce postoperative bleeding. It also has cardioprotective effects in ischemia/reperfusion injury. In this study, the effects of aprotinin on the release of cardiac markers were evaluated in patients who had good ventricular function and were undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Eighty male patients with an ejection fraction >or=40%, were randomized into either an aprotinin (Group-I; n=40) or control (Group-II; n=40) group. Patients in the aprotinin group received the full Hammersmith doses of aprotinin (2 x 10(6) KIU pre-CPB, 2 x 10(6) KIU at pump prime, 500,000 KIU/h during CPB), whereas the patients in the control group received only saline solutions. Cardiac troponin-I (cTnI) levels were measured before surgery, immediately after surgery, and at postoperative 6(th), 12(th), 24(th) h and 5(th) day. Creatine kinase (CK)-MB measurements were performed at the same time except for the postoperative 5(th) day. Cardiac index (CI), mixed venous oxygen saturation and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) measurements were also performed.

CONCLUSION

Although all patients were in reasonable condition, less myocardial enzyme leakage occurred on the aprotinin group, suggesting that aprotinin has a protective effect on the myocardium beyond that achieved with blood cardioplegia and systemic hypothermia. Because of aprotinin's effects on multiple targets of metabolism, its protective value might increase in more complicated cases.

Effects of half-dose aprotinin in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting

OBJECTIVE

The effects of half-dose aprotinin in off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery have not yet been described. The present prospective study was designed to investigate its effects in OPCAB.

METHODS

Seventy-six patients were randomized into two groups, receiving aprotinin (1 x 10(6) Kallikrein-inactivating units [KIU] loading dose before surgery and 5 x 10(5) KIU/h during surgery, gross dose: 2.5 x 10(6) KIU, n=36) and saline solution (control, n=40) respectively. Perioperative blood samples were collected. Hematologic and hemostatic parameters including platelet adhesion rate, D-dimer, and fibrinopeptide-A (FPA) were analyzed. Perioperative CKMB release was measured. Volume of blood loss, blood transfusion, and other clinical data were recorded throughout the perioperative period.

RESULTS

Postoperative blood loss was significantly reduced in patients treated with aprotinin (2 hours; median [25th-75th]: aprotinin: 90.0 [70.0-125.0] ml, control: 145.0 [70.0-180.0] ml, P<0.05; 6 hours: aprotinin: 150.0 [100.0-220.0] ml, control: 225.0 [200.0-347.5.0] ml, P<0.01; 24 hours: aprotinin: 370.0 [220.0-510.0] ml, control: 655.0 [500.0-920.0] ml, P<0.01). The number of patients receiving blood transfusion in each group was similar. Levels of D-dimer rose significantly after surgery, and were significantly lower in the aprotinin group than in the controls (end of surgery, aprotinin, 0.4 [0.2-0.5] mg/l versus controls, 1.4 [0.8-2.3] mg/l; 2 hours, aprotinin, 0.3 [0.2-0.4] mg/l versus controls, 0.9 [0.5-1.4] mg/l; 6 hours, aprotinin, 0.3 [0.2-0.5] mg/l versus controls, 0.6 [0.4-0.9] mg/l; 24 hours, aprotinin, 0.3 [0.2-0.4] mg/l versus controls, 0.5 [0.4-0.9] mg/l; ANOVA for repeated measures, P<0.01). Platelet adhesion rate and FPA levels remained at baseline levels after the operation in the two groups. Early clinical outcomes were similar in the groups. Levels of CKMB were significantly lower in the aprotinin group than in the controls (6 hours after surgery, aprotinin, 10.0 [8.0-16.0] U/l versus controls, 15.5 [11.0-20.3] U/l; 12 hours, aprotinin, 13.5 [10.0-20.0] U/l versus controls, 19.0 [12.8-24.3] U/l; 24 hours, aprotinin, 19.0 [13.5-33.8] U/l versus controls, 25.0 [15.0-43.3] U/l; 72 hours, aprotinin, 13.0 [8.0-18.0] U/l versus controls, 16.0 [10.0-29.0] U/l; ANOVA for repeated measures, P=0.018).

CONCLUSION

The results indicated that half-dose aprotinin limits fibrinolysis and myocardial injury, and reduces blood loss after OPCAB surgery.

Aprotinin decreases ischemic damage during coronary revascularization

BACKGROUND AND AIM

This study sought to determine whether the favorable anti-inflammatory effects of aprotinin might limit ischemic damage during the revascularization of ischemic myocardium.

METHODS

Twenty pigs underwent 90 minutes of coronary occlusion followed by 45 minutes of blood cardioplegic arrest and 180 minutes of reperfusion. Ten animals received a loading dose of aprotinin (40,000 kallikrein inhibiting units/kg) during the start of coronary occlusion followed by an infusion of 20,000 kallikrein inhibiting units/kg/hour. Ten other animals received no aprotinin. Summary statistics are expressed as the mean +/- standard error.

RESULTS

The aprotinin-treated animals required less cardioversions for ventricular arrhythmias (1.0 +/- 0.7 vs. 3.6 +/- 0.6; p < 0.001), accumulated less lung water (1.0 +/- 0.2% change vs. 6.2 +/- 0.9% change; p = 0.038), had more complete coronary relaxation to bradykinin (34.1 +/- 5.9% change vs. 9.2 +/- 3.5% change; p = 0.01), and had reduced infarct size (area necrosis/area risk = 20 +/- 1.1% vs. 39 +/- 1.2%; p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Aprotinin limits ischemic injury during acute coronary revascularization by decreasing ventricular arrhythmias and lung edema, preserving endothelial function, and minimizing myocardial necrosis.

Modulation of systemic inflammatory response after cardiac surgery

Cardiac surgery and cardiopulmonary bypass initiate a systemic inflammatory response largely determined by blood contact with foreign surfaces and the activation of complement. It is generally accepted that cardiopulmonary bypass initiates a whole-body inflammatory reaction. The magnitude of this inflammatory reaction varies, but the persistence of any degree of inflammation may be considered potentially harmful to the cardiac patient. The development of strategies to control the inflammatory response following cardiac surgery is currently the focus of considerable research efforts. Diverse techniques including maintenance of hemodynamic stability, minimization of exposure to cardiopulmonary bypass circuitry, and pharmacologic and immunomodulatory agents have been examined in clinical studies. This article briefly reviews the current concepts of the systemic inflammatory response following cardiac surgery, and the various therapeutic strategies being used to modulate this response.

Reactive oxygen species as mediators of cardiac injury and protection: the relevance to anesthesia practice

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are central to cardiac ischemic and reperfusion injury. They contribute to myocardial stunning, infarction and apoptosis, and possibly to the genesis of arrhythmias. Multiple laboratory studies and clinical trials have evaluated the use of scavengers of ROS to protect the heart from the effects of ischemia and reperfusion. Generally, studies in animal models have shown such effects. Clinical trials have also shown protective effects of scavengers, but whether this protection confers meaningful clinical benefits is uncertain. Several IV anesthetic drugs act as ROS scavengers. In contrast, volatile anesthetics have recently been demonstrated to generate ROS in the heart, most likely because of inhibitory effects on cardiac mitochondria. ROS are involved in the signaling cascade for cardioprotection induced by brief exposure to a volatile anesthetic (termed "anesthetic preconditioning"). ROS, therefore, although injurious in large quantities, can have a paradoxical protective effect within the heart. In this review we provide background information on ROS formation and elimination relevant to anesthetic and adjuvant drugs with particular reference to the heart. The sources of ROS, the means by which they induce cardiac injury or activate protective signaling pathways, the results of clinical studies evaluating ROS scavengers, and the effects of anesthetic drugs on ROS are each discussed.

Perioperative systemic haemostatic agents

Skilful surgery combined with blood-saving methods and careful management of blood coagulation will all help reduce unnecessary blood loss and transfusion requirements. Excessive surgical bleeding causes hypovolaemia, haemodynamic instability, anaemia and reduced oxygen delivery to tissues, with a subsequent increase in postoperative morbidity and mortality. The role of anaesthetists in managing surgical blood loss has increased greatly in the last decade. Position of the patient during surgery and the provision of a hypotensive anaesthetic regimen were once considered the most important contributions of the anaesthetist to decreasing blood loss. Now, several pharmacological haemostatic agents are being used by anaesthetists as blood-saving agents. After a brief discussion of the physiology of haemostasis, this article will review the evidence for the role of such agents in reducing perioperative blood loss and transfusion requirements.

Reduction of myocardial reperfusion injury by aprotinin after regional ischemia and cardioplegic arrest

BACKGROUND

Surgical coronary revascularization with cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegia has been associated with reperfusion injury. The serine protease inhibitor aprotinin has been suggested to reduce reperfusion injury, yet a clinically relevant study examining regional ischemia under conditions of cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegia has not been performed.

METHODS

Pigs were subjected to 30 minutes of regional myocardial ischemia by distal left anterior descending coronary artery occlusion, followed by 60 minutes of cardiopulmonary bypass with 45 minutes of cardioplegic arrest and 90 minutes of post-cardiopulmonary bypass reperfusion. The treatment group (n = 6) was administered aprotinin systemically (40,000 kallikrein-inhibiting units [KIU]/kg intravenous loading dose, 40,000 KIU/kg pump prime, and 10,000 KIU x kg(-1) x h(-1) intravenous continuous infusion). Control animals (n = 6) received crystalloid solution. Global and regional myocardial functions were analyzed by the left ventricular+dP/dt and the percentage segment shortening, respectively. Left ventricular infarct size was measured by tetrazolium staining. Tissue myeloperoxidase activity was measured. Myocardial sections were immunohistochemically stained for nitrotyrosine. Coronary microvessel function was studied by videomicroscopy.

RESULTS

Myocardial infarct size was decreased with aprotinin treatment (27.0% +/- 3.5% vs 45.3% +/- 3.0%, aprotinin vs control; P <.05). Myocardium from the ischemic territory showed diminished nitrotyrosine staining in aprotinin-treated animals versus controls, and this was significant by grade (1.3 +/- 0.2 vs 3.2 +/- 0.2, aprotinin vs control; P <.01). In the aprotinin group, coronary microvessel relaxation improved most in response to the endothelium-dependent agonist adenosine diphosphate (44.7% +/- 3.2% vs 19.7% +/- 1.7%, aprotinin vs control; P <.01). No significant improvements in myocardial function were observed with aprotinin treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Aprotinin reduces reperfusion injury after regional ischemia and cardioplegic arrest. Protease inhibition may represent a molecular strategy to prevent postoperative myocardial injury after surgical revascularization with cardiopulmonary bypass.

Perioperative myocardial ischemia reperfusion injury

Myocardial I-R injury contributes to adverse cardiovascular outcomes after cardiac surgery. The pathogenesis of I-R injury is complex and involves the activation, coordination, and amplification of several systemic and local proinflammatory pathways (Fig. 4). Treatment and prevention of perioperative morbidity associated with myocardial I-R will ultimately require a multifocal approach. Combining preoperative risk stratification (co-morbidity and surgical complexity), minimizing initiating factors predisposing to SIRS, limiting ischemia duration, and administering appropriate immunotherapy directed toward systemic and local proinflammatory mediators of I-R injury, should all be considered. In addition, the role of the genetic-environmental interactions in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease is also being examined. Thus, in the near future, preoperative screening for polymorphisms of certain inflammatory and coagulation genes should inevitably help reduce morbidity by permitting the identification of high-risk cardiac surgical patients and introducing the opportunity for gene therapy or pharmacogenetic intervention [42,64].

The systemic inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass

Although our understanding of the basic pathophysiology of systemic inflammatory response to CPB has significantly advanced in the last 2 decades, these experimentally derived ideas have yet to be fully integrated into clinical practice. Treatment of the systemic inflammatory response to CPB is also confounded by the fact that inhibition of inflammation might disrupt protective physiologic responses or result in immunosuppression. Although it is unlikely that no single therapeutic strategy will ever be sufficient in of itself to totally prevent CPB-associated morbidity, the combination of multiple pharmacologic and mechanical therapeutic strategies, each selectively targeted at different components of the inflammatory response, may eventually result in significantly improved clinical outcomes following cardiac surgery.

Effect of two different bypass techniques on the serum troponin-T levels in newborns and children: does pH-Stat provide better protection?

BACKGROUND

Cardiac troponin-T is a sensitive marker of myocardial damage. In a prospective study, the effect of 2 different pH strategies during cardiopulmonary bypass on ischemic myocardial injury and clinical outcome was measured in a pediatric population.

METHODS AND RESULTS

One hundred one patients (31 neonates 13.2+/-8.3 days and 70 children 34.5+/-44.1 months of age) undergoing open-heart surgery were selected to either alpha-stat (n=51) or pH-stat (n=50) acid-based management protocol. Serum troponin-T levels were measured before and 30 minutes after bypass and then 4 and 24 hours postoperatively. Surgical procedure, bypass details, inotropic support requirement, and postoperative recovery were recorded. Baseline troponin-T level was higher in neonates than in children (0.18+/-0.22 versus 0.04+/-0.05 microg/L, P=0.02). Also, a higher baseline level was found in patients with pulmonary hypertension (0.13+/-0.21 versus 0.04+/-0.05 microg/L, P=0.04). Cyanotic children showed a higher peak troponin-T level (3.76+/-3.11 versus 1.67+/-1.33 microg/L, P=0.04). Peak troponin levels showed a correlation with the length of circulatory arrest and aortic cross-clamp time. Postoperative levels remained high at 24 hours in patients requiring inotropic support. Peak troponin-T levels were significantly lower in the pH-stat group in patients with pulmonary hypertension (P=0.03) and in cases where circulatory arrest (P=0.01) or inotropic support (P=0.01) was necessary during operation than in those with alpha-stat technique. Postoperative ventilation time and length of intensive care unit stay were also significantly longer with alpha-stat than with pH-stat technique (P=0.005 and P=0.006, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Cardiac troponin-T sensitively reflects myocardial damage in children. Our results suggest that pH-stat acid-based management protocol may provide better protection against ischemic myocardial damage than alpha-stat technique.

Aprotinin and preservation of myocardial function after ischemia-reperfusion injury

Ischemia-reperfusion injury, a complex process involving the generation and release of inflammatory cytokines, accumulation and infiltration of neutrophils and macrophages, release of oxygen free radicals, activation of proteases, and generation of nitric oxide (NO), may result in myocardial dysfunction and possible injury to other major organs. Aprotinin, a nonspecific serine protease inhibitor used to reduce the blood loss and transfusion requirements accompanying cardiac surgery, has dose-dependent effects on coagulation, fibrinolytic, and inflammatory variables. Data indicate that aprotinin may provide protection from ischemia-reperfusion injury. In myocardial tissue models of ischemia and reperfusion, aprotinin has been shown to reduce uptake of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), generation of NO, and accumulation of leukocytes. Improved myocardial function has been observed with aprotinin treatment in animal models of ischemia-reperfusion injury. In humans, data indicate that integrin expression associated with leukocyte transmigration as well as markers of myocardial damage are reduced in patients receiving aprotinin. Further, data suggest that patients who receive aprotinin may have a reduced need for inotropic support and a decreased incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation. In all, review of this topic indicates that aprotinin may reduce aspects of ischemia-reperfusion injury and prospective clinical studies are needed to evaluate the impact of aprotinin on associated patient outcomes.

Cardioprotective effects of the serine protease inhibitor aprotinin after regional ischemia and reperfusion on the beating heart

OBJECTIVE

Early coronary reperfusion of the ischemic myocardium is a desired therapeutic goal to preserve myocardium. However, reperfusion itself contributes to an additional myocardial injury (ie, reperfusion injury), which has been attributed to neutrophil infiltration with subsequent release of proteases and oxygen-derived radicals. We studied the effects of the serine protease inhibitor aprotinin (Trasylol) on myocardial ischemia and reperfusion in a rat model.

METHODS

The effects of aprotinin (5000 and 20,000 U/kg) were examined in vivo in a rat model of regional myocardial ischemia (20 minutes) and long-term reperfusion (24 hours). Cardioprotecive effects were determined by means of measurement of creatine kinase and myeloperoxidase activity within the myocardium, as well as histochemical analysis.

RESULTS

Aprotinin (20,000 U/kg) administrated 2 minutes before reperfusion significantly attenuated myocardial injury expressed as creatine kinase washout compared with that seen in vehicle-treated rats (65 +/- 25 vs 585 +/- 98 creatine kinase difference in units per 100 mg, P <.01). Administration of 5000 U/kg of the protease inhibitor resulted in partial inhibition of myocardial reperfusion injury. Moreover, cardiac myeloperoxidase activity in the ischemic myocardium, a marker of neutrophil accumulation, was significantly reduced after aprotinin treatment. Histologic analysis of the reperfused myocardium demonstrated reduced polymorphonuclear leukocyte infiltration and reduced tissue injury. Furthermore, aprotinin treatment resulted in decreased induction of cardiac myocyte apoptosis compared with that seen in vehicle-treated rats.

CONCLUSIONS

Inhibition of serine proteases with aprotinin appears to be an effective means of preserving ischemic myocardium from reperfusion injury, even after 24 hours of reperfusion. Aprotinin might exert cardioprotection through inhibition of polymorphonuclear leukocyte-induced myocardial injury and inhibition of reperfusion-induced apoptosis of cardiac myocytes.

Protect the heart in the intensive care unit--but how?

The heart plays a pivotal role in determining the oxygen supply to the body. As a result of its high oxygen extraction ratio, the myocardium must function efficiently to supply itself with oxygen. In the context of the ICU, the efficient functioning of the myocardium is confounded by a number of pathologic processes that may interfere with its oxygen supply or increase its oxygen demand. Conventional drug treatment of acute myocardial decompensation tends to increase myocardial oxygen demand. The myocardium may potentially be "protected" by treatment modalities that favorably alter the oxygen supply to demand ratio. Newer methods of protecting the heart may involve improving the coordination of myocardial contraction, using novel inotropic agents, supporting the myocardium metabolically, administrating blood products more conservatively, favorably altering the immune response, and using mechanical support devices. Myocardial protection may be improved by better use and understanding of monitors of myocardial performance.

Aprotinin reduces the IL-8 after coronary artery bypass grafting

The effect of aprotinin, a protease inhibitor, on myocardial interleukin-8 (IL-8) production after ischemia-reperfusion injury was investigated. Twenty patients who had elective coronary artery bypass grafting were included in this study. Patients were randomly divided into two groups (n = 10 in each). Group A patients received high dose aprotinin (20,000 IU/kg as pretreatment followed by 7500 IU/kg for 6 h) and Group B patients received normal saline as a control. Serum IL-8 levels after the termination of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) showed a significant improvement in aprotinin treated group compared to control group (70 +/- 42.6 vs 360.71 +/- 87.9 ng/ml) (P < 0.005). Levels were also significantly higher at post-operative 24th hour in patients who did not received aprotinin (340.16 +/- 92.10 vs 96.13 +/- 34.33 ng/ml). However at post-operative 48th hour levels were again higher in control (untreated) group, but the difference was not statistically significant (78.8 +/- 34.4 vs 42.8 +/- 9.29 ng/ml). Aprotinin prevented the IL-8 release from myocytes in ischemia-reperfusion injury. The mechanism is highly dependent on anti-protease activity of aprotinin.

Na(+)/H(+)-exchange inhibition and aprotinin administration: promising tools for myocardial protection during minimally invasive CABG

OBJECTIVE

Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), carried out on the warm beating heart, does not allow conventional myocardial protection. The objective was to investigate the possibility of enhancing tolerance to ischemia during short episodes of coronary artery occlusion, based on a pharmacological approach using a selective Na(+)/H(+)-exchange inhibitor (cariporide) or a serine protease inhibitor (aprotinin).

METHODS

Four groups (n=6 in each group) of sheep were subjected to 20 min of normothermic regional ischemia (first lateral branch of the circumflex artery occlusion) followed by 1 h of reperfusion. Regional wall thickening was measured using sonomicrometry, and expressed as the percentage of thickening fraction compared with baseline. Group I was the control with no treatment, group II received cariporide (1 mg/kg administered over 2 min prior to ischemia), group III was treated with aprotinin (2.10(6) kallikrein inactivation units (KIU) load followed by 500.000 KIU/h). Group IV was treated with a combination of cariporide and aprotinin at the same concentrations as in groups II and III, respectively.

RESULTS

Wall thickening measurements showed that, compared with control, cariporide was largely able to suppress secondary loss of wall thickening after initial recovery during early reperfusion. Wall thickening in the ischemic/reperfused myocardial area improved from 10+/-31 to 51+/-17% at 1 h of reperfusion (P=0.002). Aprotinin improved wall thickening at the end of 1 h of reperfusion to 70+/-13% (P=0.0001). However, in this group, there was a transient loss of regional contractility similar in amplitude and time course to the one observed in the control group. A combination of cariporide and aprotinin suppressed transient contractile loss and resulted in improved wall thickening at the end of 1 h of reperfusion (65+/-22%, P=0.0002 vs. control). This value was not significantly different from the cariporide (P=0.263) or aprotinin (P=0.704) group.

CONCLUSION

These data indicate that both Na(+)/H(+)-exchange inhibition and aprotinin administration are promising tools for cardioprotection during minimally invasive CABG. A combination of both treatments is able to adequately suppress loss of contractility during early reperfusion as a consequence of reperfusion injury, and results in significantly improved wall thickening at the end of 1 h of reperfusion.

Comparison of epsilon aminocaproic acid and low-dose aprotinin in cardiopulmonary bypass: efficiency, safety and cost

BACKGROUND

In this study we compared the clinical efficiency, safety, and economic benefit of low-dose aprotinin with epsilon aminocaproic acid (EACA) in reducing bleeding after cardiopulmonary bypass operation.

METHODS

In a double-blind, randomized study, 100 patients received low-dose aprotinin (2 x 10(6) kallikrein inhibitor units) or EACA (20 g). The surgical procedure was single- or double-valve replacement with or without coronary artery bypass grafts.

RESULTS

Mediastinal chest drainage and transfusion requirements with both therapies were similar. There were no urgent reoperations to secure hemostasis in either group. Similar levels of D-dimer with both therapies indicate a similar inhibition of fibrinolysis. Release of troponin I was less in the low-dose aprotinin group 1 and 4 hours after bypass, although electrocardiographic measurements did not reflect this difference. Levels of S-100beta and neuron-specific enolase were similar with both therapies, confirming that there was no difference in the occurrence of any adverse neurologic events in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose aprotinin and EACA showed similar effects on the reduction of intraoperative and postoperative bleeding. The lower cost of EACA with no change in safety outcome suggests it is the preferred treatment.

Anti-fibrinolytic use for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion

BACKGROUND

Concerns regarding the safety of transfused blood have prompted re-consideration of the use of allogeneic (blood from an unrelated donor) blood transfusion.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of the anti-fibrinolytic drugs aprotinin, tranexamic acid, and epsilon aminocaproic acid, on peri-operative red blood cell (RBC) transfusion.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched MEDLINE (to May 1998), EMBASE (to December 1997), web sites of international health technology assessment agencies (to May 1998). References in identified trials and review articles were checked and authors contacted to identify any additional studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials of anti-fibrinolytic drugs in adults scheduled for non-urgent surgery.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

We found 61 trials of aprotinin (7027 participants). Aprotinin reduced the rate of RBC transfusion by a relative 30% (RR=0.70: 95%CI: 0.64 to 0.76). The average absolute risk reduction (ARR) was 20.4% (95%CI: 15.6% to 25.3%). On average, aprotinin use saved 1.1 units of RBC (95%CI: 0.69 to 1.47) in those requiring transfusion. Aprotinin also significantly reduced the need for re-operation due to bleeding (RR=0.40: 95%CI: 0.25 to 0.66). We found 18 trials of tranexamic acid (TXA) (1,342 participants). TXA reduced the rate of RBC transfusion by a relative 34% (RR=0.66: 95%CI: 0.54 to 0.81). This represented an ARR of 17.2% (95%CI: 8.7% to 25.7%). TXA use resulted in a saving of 1.03 units of RBC (95%CI: 0.67 to 1.39) in those requiring transfusion. We found four trials of epsilon aminocaproic acid (EACA) (208 participants). EACA use resulted in a statistically non-significant reduction in RBC transfusion (RR=0.48: 95%CI: 0.19 to 1.19). Comparisons between agents Eight trials made 'head-to-head' comparisons between TXA and aprotinin. There was no significant difference between the two drugs in the rate of RBC transfusion: RR=1.21 (95%CI: 0.83 to 1.76) for TXA compared to aprotinin. Adverse Effects Aprotinin did not seem to be associated with an excess risk of adverse effects, including thrombo-embolic events (thrombosis RR=0.64: 95%CI: 0.31 to 1.31) and renal failure (RR=1.19: 95%CI: 0.79 to 1.79). Fewer data were available for TXA and EACA.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

From this review it appears that aprotinin reduces the need for red cell transfusion, and the need for re-operation due to bleeding, without serious adverse effects. However, there was significant heterogeneity in trial outcomes, and some evidence of publication bias. Similar trends were seen with TXA and EACA, although the data were rather sparse. The poor evaluation of these latter drugs is unfortunate as results suggest they may be equally as effective as aprotinin, but are significantly cheaper. The evidence reviewed here supports the use of aprotinin in cardiac surgery. Further small trials of this drug are not warranted. Future trials should be large enough to compare the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of aprotinin with that of TXA and EACA.

Role of aprotinin in the management of patients during and after cardiac surgery

Management of patients undergoing cardiac surgery has evolved in recent years as more is understood about the physiological changes and responses that occur during and after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). In particular, our understanding of the mechanisms involved in haemostasis and in the inflammatory response to bypass surgery, has allowed significant refinements in patient management. Improvements in the pharmacological conservation of blood loss have been striking, particularly with the development of the serine protease inhibitor, aprotinin (Trasylol, Bayer). Aprotinin represents a significant improvement, especially for patients at high risk, since it reduces the need for allogeneic and (sometimes scarce) blood products. However, in view of its cost, making an appropriate selection of patients most at risk of serious blood loss is a major consideration in the use of aprotinin. While its mechanisms of action are not well understood, the use of aprotinin also appears to reduce inflammatory response to CPB.

Does aprotinin reduce lung reperfusion damage after cardiopulmonary bypass?

OBJECTIVE

The role of aprotinin in the prevention of lung reperfusion injury was investigated in the patients undergoing cardio-pulmonary bypass (CPB) for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) operations.

METHODS

The study was planned randomly and prospectively. Two hundred milliliters of physiological saline solution was added to the prime solution of patients in group I (n=10) whereas, 200 ml aprotinin (Trasylol, Bayer AG) was given to patients in group II (n=10). In order to measure lung tissue malondialdehyde (MDA) levels, glutathion peroxidase (GSH-Px) activity levels and polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs) numbers, lung tissue samples were taken before CPB and 5 min after removing the cross clamp. In addition, alveolo-arterial oxygen difference (AaDO(2)) for tissue oxygenation was calculated by obtaining arterial blood gas samples.

RESULTS

MDA levels before CPB increased from 41.72+/-21.00 nmol/g tissue to 66.71+/-13.44 nmol/g tissue in group I and from 43.44+/-5.16 nmol MDA/g tissue to 53.22+/-10.95 nmol MDA/g tissue in group II after cross clamp removal (P=0.001 and P=0.021, respectively). The increase in group II was found to be significantly lower than group I (P=0.048). With the initiation of reperfusion, GSH-Px activity decreased in group I from 3.05+/-0.97 to 2.31+/-0.46 U/mg protein (P=0.015) whereas GSH-Px activity in group II decreased from 3.18+/-1.01 to 2.74+/-0.81 U/mg protein (P=0. 055). This decrease in the group II was less than group I (P=0.049). AaDO(2) significantly increased in the group I and II (P=0.012 and P=0.020, respectively), but elevation in the group I was significant than in the Group II (P=0.049). In histopathological examination, it was observed that neutrophil counts in the lung parenchyma rose significantly following removal of cross clamp in both groups (P=0. 001). The increase in group I was significantly larger than in group II (P=0.050).

CONCLUSION

Results represented in our study indicate that addition of aprotinin (2 million units) into the prime solution during CPB can reduce lung reperfusion injury.

Prophylactic nitroglycerin did not reduce myocardial ischemia during accelerated recovery management of coronary artery bypass graft surgery patients

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the use of a high dose of nitroglycerin (NTG) for prophylaxis against myocardial ischemia and infarction in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery with accelerated recovery.

DESIGN

Prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized study.

SETTING

A university-based medical center.

PARTICIPANTS

Forty adult patients presenting for elective CABG surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

Forty patients were divided into 2 blinded study groups. Twenty patients received 2 microg/kg/min of NTG starting before induction of anesthesia and continuing for 6 hours after extubation in the intensive care unit. The placebo group (n = 20) received normal saline during this same interval.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Hemodynamics, incidence and severity of myocardial ischemia, and myocardial infarction rates were determined. There were no differences in hemodynamic parameters between groups. The incidence of ischemia was approximately 35% in each group. Myocardial infarction (as determined by elevated creatine kinase-MB fraction, troponin I, and electrocardiogram criteria) was 10% in the placebo group and 5% in the NTG group (p = 0.234).

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows a high incidence of myocardial ischemia and infarction in patients presenting for CABG surgery with an accelerated recovery management scheme. NTG was well tolerated clinically; however, it was not found to be protective against myocardial ischemia or infarction in this setting.

Release of cardiac troponin I in antegrade crystalloid versus cold blood cardioplegia

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of myocardial protection, comparing antegrade crystalloid cardioplegia with cold blood cardioplegia, in patients with preserved left ventricular function who were undergoing elective first coronary artery bypass grafting. Release of cardiac troponin I was used as a marker for the effectiveness of myocardial protection.

METHODS

A consecutive series of 62 patients were randomly assigned to receive crystalloid or blood cardioplegia. Cardiac troponin I concentrations were determined in venous blood samples before the operation, immediately after unclamping, at 6, 9, 12, and 24 hours, and daily thereafter for 5 days.

RESULTS

Rising levels of troponin I were found in all patients. The time course and peak release were similar in the crystalloid cardioplegia and the blood cardioplegia groups. No patients in either group had electrocardiographic evidence of perioperative myocardial infarction. Cardiac troponin I was able to detect small areas of myocardial damage, not revealed by electrocardiography or creatine kinase MB release. Aprotinin administration was associated with lower cardiac troponin I release in both groups. Cardiac troponin I was lower in patients whose conditions did not require electrical defibrillation after aortic unclamping, irrespective of cardioplegia type. The presence of a main stem lesion was associated with higher cardiac troponin I release only in the crystalloid cardioplegia group.

CONCLUSIONS

Antegrade cold blood cardioplegia is equally effective as antegrade crystalloid cardioplegia in a randomized group of patients with preserved left ventricular function who were undergoing elective first coronary artery bypass grafting. Aprotinin administration resulted in lower cardiac troponin I release, whereas electrical defibrillation was related to a higher release irrespective of cardioplegia type. The presence of a main stem lesion resulted in higher cardiac troponin I release in the crystalloid cardioplegia group.

Pump prime only aprotinin inhibits cardiopulmonary bypass-induced neutrophil CD11b up-regulation

BACKGROUND

The expression of neutrophil integrin CD11b is up-regulated after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and is the neutrophil adhesive molecule of most importance in neutrophil- endothelial adherence. This neutrophil-endothelial adherence is responsible for post-CPB neutrophil-induced reperfusion injury. Low-dose aprotinin protocols inhibit the CPB-induced neutrophil CD11b up-regulation. This investigation was undertaken to evaluate the effects of pump prime only aprotinin (280 mg) on the CPB-induced up-regulation of this neutrophil integrin.

METHODS

Twenty-two patients scheduled for elective myocardial revascularization were randomized into two groups: (1) control (n = 12), or (2) pump prime only aprotinin (280 mg) (n = 10). Neutrophils were isolated at baseline, 50 minutes of CPB, and 30 minutes after CPB and neutrophil CD11b expression was measured.

RESULTS

The control group demonstrated a significant (p < 0.05) increase in neutrophil CD11b immunofluorescent staining at 50 minutes of CPB and at 30 minutes after CPB when compared to same group baseline and to the pump prime only aprotinin group at similar time intervals.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that pump prime only aprotinin modulates the CPB-induced up-regulation of neutrophil CD11b integrin, an important indicator of the systemic inflammatory response to CPB. In addition to blunting of the CPB-induced up-regulation of this neutrophil integrin expression, this pump prime only dose of aprotinin is also reported to be effective at reducing post-CPB bleeding and transfusion requirements. This salutary effect of pump prime only aprotinin suggests that such low-dose regimens can be both therapeutically effective and cost effective.