Living-donor lobar lung transplantation experience: intermediate results

Adult living-donor lobar lung transplant using a small-for-size graft

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed to examine the outcomes of adult living-donor lobar lung transplants (LDLLTs) using small-for-size grafts.

METHODS

A calculated graft forced vital capacity of <50% of the predicted forced vital capacity of the recipient was considered to indicate a small-for-size graft. Adult recipients (≥18 years) who underwent LDLLTs between 2008 and 2022 were included in this study.

RESULTS

We performed 80 adult LDLLTs, using small-for-size grafts in 15 patients and non-small grafts in 65 patients. Grade 3 primary graft dysfunction developed within 72 h after the transplant in 3 patients (20%) in the small group and in 3 patients (4.6%) in the non-small group (P = 0.0763). The 1- and 5-year survival rates were 86.7% and 69.3% in the small group and 93.8% and 77.1% in the non-small group (P = 0.742). In the small group, the native lungs were spared in 8 patients, whereas 2 lobar grafts were implanted with non-spared native lungs in the other 7 patients. The 1- and 5-year survival rates were significantly better in the spared group (both 100%) than in the non-spared group (71.4% and 23.8%; P = 0.0375). The spared group showed a significantly higher median percent forced vital capacity after the transplant than the non-spared group (68.5% vs 44.9%; P = 0.0027).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the use of small-for-size grafts was associated with a higher rate of severe primary graft dysfunction, no differences were found in survival rates. When the graft is small, the native lung should be partially spared if possible.

Outcomes after lung transplantation from selected donors older than 70 years in a single centre: time to close the debate?

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of lung transplantations using grafts from donors aged over 70 years against those performed using younger donors.

METHODS

This retrospective single-centre analysis includes lung transplants conducted at our institution from January 2014 to June 2022. Lung recipients were classified into 2 groups based on donor age (group A <70 years; group B ≥70 years). Variables regarding demographics, peri and postoperative outcomes and survival were included. The statistical analysis approach included univariable analysis, propensity score matching to address imbalances in donor variables (smoking status), recipient characteristics (sex, age, diagnosis and lung allocation score) and calendar period and survival analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 353 lung transplants were performed in this period, 47 (13.3%) using grafts from donors aged over 70 years. Donors in group B were more frequently women (70.2% vs 51.6%, P = 0.017), with less smoking history (22% vs 43%, P = 0.002) and longer mechanical ventilation time (3 vs 2 days, P = 0.025). Recipients in group B had a higher lung allocation score (37.5 vs 35, P = 0.035). Postoperative variables were comparable between both groups, except for pulmonary function tests. Group B demonstrated lower forced expiratory volume 1 s levels (2070 vs 2580 ml, P = 0.001). The propensity score matching showed a lower chance of chronic lung allograft dysfunction by 12% for group B. One-, three- and five-year survival was equal between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of selected expanded-criteria donors aged over 70 years did not result in increased postoperative morbidity, early mortality or survival in this study.

Living-donor lobar lung transplantation

Living-donor lobar lung transplantation (LDLLT) is indicated for critically ill patients who would not survive the waiting period in the case of severe brain-dead donor shortage. It is essential to confirm that potential donors are willing to donate without applying psychological pressure from others. In standard LDLLT, the right and left lower lobes donated by 2 healthy donors are implanted into the recipient under cardiopulmonary support. LDLLT can be applied to various lung diseases including restrictive, obstructive, infectious, and vascular lung diseases in both adult and pediatric patients if size matching is acceptable. Functional size matching by measuring donor pulmonary function and anatomical size matching by 3-dimensional computed tomography volumetry are very useful. When 2 donors with ideal size matching are not available, various transplant procedures, such as single lobe, segmental, recipient lobe-sparing, and inverted lobar transplants are valuable options. There seems to be immunological advantages in LDLLT as compared to cadaveric lung transplantation (CLT). Unilateral chronic allograft dysfunction is a unique manifestation after bilateral LDLLT, which may contribute to better prognosis. The growth of adult lung graft implanted into growing pediatric recipients is suggested by radiologic evaluation. Although only 2 lobes are implanted, postoperative pulmonary function is equivalent between LDLLT and CLT. The long-term outcome after LDLLT is similar to or better than that after CLT. The author has performed 164 LDLLTs resulting in 71.6% survival rate at 10 years. All living-donors returned to their previous life styles. Because of possible serious morbidity in donors, LDLLT should be applied only for critically ill patients.

Readmissions and costs in cadaveric and living-donor lobar lung transplantation: Analysis using a national database

Living-donor lobar lung transplantation (LDLLT) is a well-established surgical procedure with favorable outcomes; however, the frequency of readmission and costs in LDLLT are poorly understood. Here, we aimed to compare health care costs and readmissions at 90 days and 1 year after the index discharge in LDLLT and cadaveric lung transplantation (CLT) and evaluate the reasons for readmission and in-hospital mortality. In this retrospective cohort study, we used the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database, a nationwide inpatient database in Japan to obtain initial lung transplantation data for all patients from July 2010 to March 2020. Multivariable Poisson or multiple regression analyses after multiple imputation was performed to compare the cumulative number of readmissions and costs between patients receiving LDLLT and CLT. Among 514 recipients, 115 (22%) underwent LDLLT and 399 (78%) received CLT. Overall, in-hospital mortality after transplantation was 4.5%. The LDLLT group showed a significantly lower crude readmission rate (90 days, 22% vs 37%, p = 0.004; 1 year, 48% vs 62%, p = 0.031) and median readmission cost (90 days, United States dollar (USD) 0 vs 0, p = 0.003; 1 year, USD 1178 vs 4714, p = 0.005) than the CLT group. Multivariable regression analyses showed that the LDLLT group had a lower risk of readmission (incidence rate ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.38-0.92; p = 0.020) and lower costs at 90 days (difference, USD -11,629; 95% confidence interval, -5682 to -17,462; p < 0.001). The most frequent cause of readmission was pneumonia in both groups. LDLLT was associated with lower readmissions and health care costs in comparison with CLT. Our findings provide a scientific basis for further studies with larger cohorts.

Technical Aspects of Lung Transplantation: Pediatric and Lobar Transplantation

Fewer patients undergo pediatric lung transplantation (PLT) than adult lung transplantation. Size mismatch is the key factor that limits the availability of potential donors. Every candidate for PLT is in a different scenario in terms of age, height and weight, size of structures, indications for PLT, the concomitant presence of a cardiac anomaly, and other individual-specific factors; thus, a thorough understanding of pediatric patients’ medical problems is essential. Living-donor lobar lung transplantation (LDLLT) has only been performed once in Korea to date. However, since each step in the LDLLT is a well-established procedure, including intrapericardial lobectomy, lung procurement, and lobar lung transplantation, qualified surgeons and lung transplantation teams are competent to perform LDLLT in clinically necessary situations.

Living-donor Segmental Lung Transplantation for Pediatric Patients

OBJECTIVE

The preset study evaluated the outcome of living-donor segmental lung transplantation for pediatric patients.

METHODS

Between August 2009 and May 2021, we performed living-donor segmental lung transplantation in 6 critically ill pediatric patients, including 1 patient on a ventilator alone and another patient on a ventilator and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). There were 4 male and 2 female patients, with a median age of 7 years (range, 4-15 years) and a median height of 112.7 cm (range, 95-125.2 cm). The diagnoses included complications of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (n = 4) and pulmonary fibrosis (n = 2). All patients received bilateral lung transplantation under cardiopulmonary bypass. A basal segment and a lower lobe were implanted in 3 patients, and a basal segment and an S6 segment were implanted in the other 3 patients. In 2 patients, the right S6 segmental graft was horizontally rotated 180° and implanted as the left lung.

RESULTS

Among the 9 segmental grafts implanted, 7 functioned well after reperfusion. Two rotated S6 segmental grafts became congestive, with 1 requiring graft extraction and the other venous repair, which was successful. There was 1 hospital death (14 days) due to sepsis and 1 late death (9 years) due to leukoencephalopathy. The remaining 4 patients are currently alive at 9 months, 10 months, 1.3 years, and 1.9 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Living-donor segmental lung transplantation was a technically difficult but feasible procedure with acceptable outcomes for small pediatric patients with chest cavities that were too small for adult lower lobe implantation.

Long-term outcomes of living-donor lobar lung transplantation

OBJECTIVE

Although living-donor lobar lung transplantation (LDLLT) enables an intermediate survival similar to cadaveric lung transplantation, the long-term outcome remains unknown. We examined the long-term outcomes of 30 patients who received LDLLT more than 16 years previously.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of 30 patients who underwent LDLLT (bilateral LDLLT, 29 patients; single LDLLT, 1 pediatric patient) between October 1998 and April 2004.

RESULTS

LDLLT was performed for 25 female and 5 male patients ranging in age from 8 to 55 years. The diagnoses included pulmonary hypertension (n = 11), pulmonary fibrosis (n = 7), bronchiolitis obliterans (n = 5), and others (n = 7). At a median follow-up of 205 months, 22 patients were alive and 8 were dead. The causes of death were infection (n = 3), malignancy (n = 2), acute rejection (n = 2), and chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD; n = 1). Unilateral CLAD occurred in 17 patients (56.7%), but only 1 of these patients subsequently developed bilateral CLAD. Two patients underwent bilateral cadaveric lung retransplantations. The 5-, 10-, and 15-year CLAD-free survival rates were 80.0%, 62.8%, and 44.3%, respectively. Malignancy occurred in 7 patients. Two of 5 patients with chronic kidney disease requiring hemodialysis underwent living-donor kidney transplantation. The 5-, 10-, and 15-year overall survival rates were 96.7%, 86.7%, and 73.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Although only 2 lobes are implanted, LDLLT provides encouraging long-term outcomes. In patients with unilateral CLAD, the functioning contralateral graft might contribute to a favorable long-term outcome.

Lung transplantation from uncontrolled and controlled donation after circulatory death: similar outcomes to brain death donors

Controlled donation after circulatory death donors (cDCD) are becoming a frequent source of lungs grafts worldwide. Conversely, lung transplantations (LTx) from uncontrolled donors (uDCD) are sporadically reported. We aimed to review our institutional experience using both uDCD and cDCD and compare to LTx from brain death donors (DBD). This is a retrospective analysis of all LTx performed between January 2013 and December 2019 in our institution. Donor and recipient characteristics were collected and univariate, multivariate and survival analyses were carried out comparing the three cohorts of donors. A total of 239 (84.7%) LTx were performed from DBD, 29 (10.3%) from cDCD and 14 (5%) from uDCD. There were no statistically significant differences in primary graft dysfunction grade 3 at 72 h, 30- and 90-day mortality, need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation after procedure, ICU and hospital length of stay, airway complications, CLAD incidence or survival at 1 and 3 years after transplant (DBD: 87.1% and 78.1%; cDCD: 89.7% and 89.7%; uDCD: 85.7% and 85.7% respectively; P = 0.42). Short- and mid-term outcomes are comparable between the three types of donors. These findings may encourage and reinforce all types of donation after circulatory death programmes as a valid and growing source of suitable organs for transplantation.

Current trends in thoracic surgery

Thoracic surgery has evolved drastically in recent years. Although thoracic surgeons mainly deal with tumorous lesion in the lungs, mediastinum, and pleura, they also perform lung transplantation surgery in patients with end-stage lung disease. Herein, we introduce various major current topics in thoracic surgery. Minimally invasive surgical procedures include robot-assisted thoracic surgery and uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery. Novel techniques for sublobar resection include virtual-assisted lung mapping, image-guided video-assisted thoracic surgery, and segmentectomy using indocyanine green. Three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) simulation consists of surgeon-friendly 3D-CT image analysis systems and new-generation, dynamic 3D-CT imaging systems. Updates in cadaveric lung transplantation include use of marginal donors, including donation after circulatory death, and ex vivo lung perfusion for such donors. Topics in living donor lobar lung transplantation include size matching, donor issues, and new surgical techniques. During routine clinical practice, thoracic surgeons encounter various pivotal topics related to thoracic surgery, which are described in this report.

Comparison of de novo donor-specific antibodies between living and cadaveric lung transplantation

BACKGROUND

Despite growing interest in donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in lung transplantation (LTx), no study evaluating the outcomes in recipients with de novo DSAs (dnDSAs) in living-donor lobar LTx (LDLLT) exists. We compared various characteristics of DSAs in LDLLT with those in cadaveric LTx (CLT) based on prospectively collected data.

METHODS

Between October 2009 and September 2019, 211 recipients underwent LTx (128 CLTs and 83 LDLLTs). We reviewed 108 CLTs and 74 LDLLTs to determine the characteristics and clinical impact of dnDSAs. Eighteen data-deficient cases, 7 cases with preformed DSAs, and 4 re-transplants were excluded.

RESULTS

There were significant differences between CLT and LDLLT patients in age, primary disease, ischemic time, and number of human leukocyte antigen mismatches per donor. The dnDSA incidence in LDLLT (6.8%) was significantly lower than that in CLT (19.4%, p = 0.02). The dnDSAs appeared later in LDLLT (mean 1,256 days) than in CLT (mean 196 days, p = 0.003). According to Cox models analyzed using dnDSA as a time-dependent covariate, dnDSA positivity was significantly associated with a poor overall survival (OS; hazard ratio [HR] 3.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.59-7.57, p = 0.002) and poor CLAD-free survival in case of CLT (HR: 2.23, 95% CI: 1.08-4.63, p = 0.003). However, no such significant associations were noted in case of LDLLT.

CONCLUSIONS

The dnDSA occurrence was significantly lower and later in LDLLT than in CLT. Furthermore, dnDSA-positivity was significantly associated with worse OS and CLAD-free survival after CLT but not after LDLLT.

A novel concept for evaluation of pulmonary function utilizing PaO2/FiO2 difference at the distinctive FiO2 in cellular ex vivo lung perfusion-an experimental study

For more accurate lung evaluation in ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP), we have devised a new parameter, PaO₂ /FiO₂ ratio difference (PFD); PFD_1-0.4  = P/F ratio at FiO₂ 1.0 - P/F ratio at FiO₂ 0.4. The aim of this study is to compare PFD and transplant suitability, and physiological parameters utilized in cellular EVLP. Thirty-nine human donor lungs were perfused. At 2 h of EVLP, PFD_1-0.4 was compared with transplant suitability and physiological parameters. In a second study, 10 pig lungs were perfused in same fashion. PFD_1-0.4 was calculated by blood from upper and lower lobe pulmonary veins and compared with lobe wet/dry ratio and pathological findings. In human model, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed PFD_1-0.4 had the highest area under curve, 0.90, sensitivity, 0.96, to detect nonsuitable lungs, and significant negative correlation with lung weight ratio (R²  = 0.26, P < 0.001). In pig model, PFD_1-0.4 on lower and upper lobe pulmonary veins were significantly associated with corresponding lobe wet/dry ratios (R²  = 0.51, P = 0.019; R²  = 0.37, P = 0.060), respectively. PFD_1-0.4 in EVLP demonstrated a significant correlation with lung weight ratio and allowed more precise assessment of individual lobes in detecting lung edema. Moreover, it might support decision-making in evaluation with current EVLP criteria.

The First Living-Donor Lobar Lung Transplantation in Korea: a Case Report

Lung transplantation is the only treatment for end-stage lung disease, but the problem of donor shortage is unresolved issue. Herein, we report the first case of living-donor lobar lung transplantation (LDLLT) in Korea. A 19-year-old woman patient with idiopathic pulmonary artery hypertension received her father's right lower lobe and her mother's left lower lobe after pneumonectomy of both lungs in 2017. The patient has recovered well and is enjoying normal social activity. We think that LDLLT could be an alternative approach to deceased donor lung transplantation to overcome the shortage of lung donors.

History of lung transplantation

Lung transplantation nowadays is a well-accepted and routine treatment for well selected patients with terminal respiratory disease. However, it took several decades of experimental studies and clinical attempts to reach this success. In this paper, we describe the early experimental activity from the mid-forties until the early sixties. The first clinical attempt in humans was reported by Hardy and Webb in 1963 followed by others with short survival only except for one case by Derom et al. who lived for 10 months. Long-term successes were not reported until after the discovery of cyclosporine as a new immunosuppressive agent. Successful heart-lung transplantation (HLTx) for pulmonary vascular disease was performed by the Stanford group starting in 1981 while the Toronto group described good outcome after single-lung transplantation (SLTx) for pulmonary fibrosis in 1983 and after double-lung transplantation for emphysema in 1986. Further evolution in surgical techniques and in transplant type for the various forms of end-stage lung diseases are reviewed. The evolution in lung transplantation still continues nowadays with the use of pulmonary allografts coming from living-related donors, from donors after circulatory death, or after prior assessment and reconditioning during ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) in an attempt to overcome the critical shortage of suitable organs. Early outcome has significantly improved over the last three decades. Better treatment and prevention of chronic lung allograft dysfunction will hopefully result in further improvement of long-term survival after lung transplantation.

Three-dimensional image in lung transplantation

Three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) technologies have been developed and, recently, high-speed and high-quality 3D-CT technologies have been introduced to the field of thoracic surgery. The purpose of this manuscript is to demonstrate the clinical application of 3D-CT technologies in lung transplantation. In Japan, because of the severe donor shortage, living-donor lobar lung transplantation (LDLLT) is essential, in addition to cadaveric lung transplantation. In LDLLT, size matching is a grave issue, since ideal size matching between donor and recipient is usually difficult because of the limited population of potential donor. Size matching using pulmonary function test results has been widely used as a gold standard, but anatomical size matching using 3D-CT volumetry data has also been utilized in LDLLT. In donor lobectomy, 3D-CT images provided a variety of information regarding anatomical variation of pulmonary vessels and bronchial trees preoperatively. These images ensure surgical quality and safety, and they also affect surgical procedures for the recipient. 3D-CT images are also utilized in various aspects of postoperative care, such as detection of chronic lung allograft dysfunction and clarification of its subtypes. Furthermore, preoperative 3D-CT simulation is useful in developing and performing a special surgical procedure, such as right-to-left inverted LDLLT. In conclusion, following the introduction of 3D-CT to the field of thoracic surgery, various 3D-CT images and their application to preoperative simulations have been introduced in lung transplantation. In the near future, this technique will become more prevalent, and frequent use by thoracic surgeons will be seen worldwide in daily practice.

Pulmonary Function and Exercise Capacity in Patients With Flat Chests After Lung Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Severe chest wall deformation is generally a contraindication for lung transplantation; however, it is not known whether patients with flat chests have reduced postoperative exercise capacity and pulmonary function. This study's purpose was to investigate the relationship between preoperative thoracic shape and postoperative exercise capacity and pulmonary function in patients undergoing lung transplantation.

METHODS

Twenty recipients who underwent successful bilateral living-donor lobar lung transplantation were evaluated. To analyze postoperative graft function in relation to preoperative thoracic shape, 40 donor grafts implanted into 20 recipients were divided into two groups: flat chest group and normal chest group. Flat chest is diagnosed when the thoracic anteroposterior diameter to transverse diameter ratio is 1:3 or less.

RESULTS

The ratio of the postoperative forced vital capacity to the preoperatively estimated forced vital capacity was significantly lower in the flat chest group than in the normal chest group 1 year after lung transplantation (p = 0.002). However, there were no significant differences in postoperative 6-minute walk distances between the two groups. Furthermore, the thoracic anteroposterior diameter to transverse diameter ratio in the flat chest group significantly increased after lung transplantation (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Although postoperative pulmonary function was significantly poorer for patients with flat chests than for patients with normal chests, their postoperative exercise capacity was equivalent. We also found that flat chest severity significantly improved after lung transplantation. Our study, the first investigating postoperative functional status in patients with flat chests, clearly shows that it is possible to perform lung transplantation in such patients with acceptable outcomes.

Living-related lung transplantation

Living-donor lobar lung transplantation (LDLLT) was developed to deal with the severe shortage of brain dead door for patients who would not survive the long waiting period. In standard LDLLT, right and left lower lobes removed from two healthy donors are implanted into a recipient after right and left pneumonectomies using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The number of LDLLT has decreased in the USA due to the recent change in allocation system for cadaveric donor lungs. For the past several years, most of the reports on LDLLT have been from Japan, where the average waiting time for a cadaveric lung is exceeding 800 days. LDLLT has been performed both for adult and pediatric patients suffering from various end-stage lung diseases including restrictive, obstructive, vascular and infectious lung diseases. Since only two lobes are implanted, size matching is a very important issue. Functional size matching by measuring donor pulmonary function and anatomical size matching by three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) volumetry are very useful. For oversize graft, we have employed several techniques, including single lobe transplantation, delayed chest closure, downsizing the graft, and middle lobe transplantation. In cases of undersize mismatch, native upper lobe sparing transplant or right-left inverted transplant was performed. The 5-, 10- and 15-year survivals were 80.8%, 72.6% and 61.7%, respectively. There was no difference in survival between standard LDLLT and non-standard LDLLT such as single, sparing and inverted transplant. All donors have been discharged without any restrictions. LDLLT is a viable option for very ill patients who would not survive a long waiting time for cadaveric lungs. We have successfully developed various surgical techniques to overcome size mismatching with favorable outcome.

Pediatric Recipients of Living Donor Lobar Lung Transplants: Postoperative Care

Bilateral living donor lobar lung transplantation is a treatment option for selected children and adults with end-stage lung disease. Careful donor evaluation, skilled intraoperative management and surgical technique, and diligent immediate postoperative care and follow-up all contribute to better outcomes. Although medical management of whole lung transplant recipients in the immediate postoperative period is similar to that of lobar lung transplant recipients, there are specific differences. Anatomical distinctions, such as the entire cardiac output flowing to 2 lobes instead of 5, and thoracic space issues with simultaneous mechanical ventilation and chest tube suction, contribute to these differences. Early postoperative care, including initial postoperative stabilization, ventilation, fluid management, rejection/infection surveillance and prophylaxis, and beginning rehabilitation, can be adapted to ensure successful outcomes in these patients.

Lung transplantation for cystic fibrosis: results, indications, complications, and controversies

Survival in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) has improved dramatically over the past 30 to 40 years, with mean survival now approximately 40 years. Nonetheless, progressive respiratory insufficiency remains the major cause of mortality in CF patients, and lung transplantation (LT) is eventually required. Timing of listing for LT is critical, because up to 25 to 41% of CF patients have died while awaiting LT. Globally, approximately 16.4% of lung transplants are performed in adults with CF. Survival rates for LT recipients with CF are superior to other indications, yet LT is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality (∼50% at 5-year survival rates). Myriad complications of LT include allograft failure (acute or chronic), opportunistic infections, and complications of chronic immunosuppressive medications (including malignancy). Determining which patients are candidates for LT is difficult, and survival benefit remains uncertain. In this review, we discuss when LT should be considered, criteria for identifying candidates, contraindications to LT, results post-LT, and specific complications that may be associated with LT. Infectious complications that may complicate CF (particularly Burkholderia cepacia spp., opportunistic fungi, and nontuberculous mycobacteria) are discussed.

Postoperative respiratory management in living donor lobar lung transplantation

BACKGROUND

We evaluated postoperative respiratory management of living donor lobar lung transplantation (LDLLT).

METHODS

Perioperative variables were reviewed in 21 patients who underwent LDLLT at our institution. Recipients were kept intubated for at least two d after LDLLT to maintain optimal expansion of the implanted lobes. Subsequently, if weaning from artificial ventilation could be tolerated, extubation was considered with the assistance of non-invasive ventilation (NIV). If this could not be tolerated, early tracheostomy was considered.

RESULTS

All 21 recipients were weaned from artificial ventilation. Twelve patients underwent tracheotomy 4.4 ± 1.8 d after LDLLT and were weaned from artificial ventilation 24.3 ± 17.0 d after LDLLT. Eleven patients were extubated 3.6 ± 1.7 d after LDLLT with NIV, but two of them were reintubated, and finally weaned from artificial ventilation via tracheostomy. Excluding these two patients, NIV was required for 3.8 ± 3.9 d after extubation. The early postoperative course was significantly eventful in patients with tracheostomies, and artificial ventilation, ventilatory support, and intensive care unit stays were longer. Twenty patients (95%) showed survival at 24.4 ± 13.4 months of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative respiratory management with NIV and early tracheostomy were useful after LDLLT.

Adaptation over a wide range of donor graft lung size discrepancies in living-donor lobar lung transplantation

Living-donor lobar lung transplantation (LDLLT), unlike deceased donor lung transplantation, often involves a wide range of size discrepancies between donors and recipients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the function of donor lung grafts in the recipient thorax in 14 cases of bilateral LDLLT involving 28 successfully transplanted lower-lobe grafts. Pulmonary function tests and three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) volumetry were performed perioperatively. According to 3D-CT size matching, donor graft volumes ranged from 40% to 161% of the hemilateral thoracic volumes of the recipients. Graft forced vital capacity (FVC) values increased over time, reaching 102 ± 39% of preoperatively estimated values at 12 months postoperatively. Graft volumes also increased over time, reaching 120 ± 38% of the original values at 12 months postoperatively. Undersized donor grafts expanded more after LDLLT than oversized donor grafts, producing greater FVC values than those estimated preoperatively, whereas oversized donor grafts became inflated to their original size and maintained FVC values that approached the preoperative estimates. Thus, donor grafts were found to overinflate or underinflate to the extent that they could preserve their native function in the new recipient's environment.

Living-donor lobar lung transplantation for rapidly progressive interstitial pneumonia associated with clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis: report of a case

Diffuse interstitial pneumonia (IP) associated with collagen disease is a rare indication for lung transplantation. The manifestations of collagen disease are variable and dermatomyositis (DM) is often considered a contraindication for lung transplantation because of active myositis and a high incidence of malignancy. Furthermore, clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis (C-ADM) is associated with rapidly progressive IP resulting in a poor prognosis. Bilateral living-donor lobar lung was transplanted in a 52-year-old female with rapidly progressive IP associated with C-ADM, and the postoperative course was uneventful. To our knowledge, this case represents the first living-donor lobar lung transplantation for a patient with rapidly progressive IP associated with C-ADM.

Cadaveric lobar lung transplantation: technical aspects

BACKGROUND

The use of lobar transplantation and other size reduction techniques has allowed larger donor lungs to be utilized for smaller recipients who tend to have longer waiting times for transplantation. However, despite these advantages, the techniques have not been widely adopted. We outline the surgical and sizing issues associated with this technique.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 23 consecutive patients who received lung transplantation with anatomic lobar reduction was performed, focusing on surgical technique and outcomes.

RESULTS

All 23 patients received an anatomic lobar reduction of between 1 and 3 lobes. Survival analysis showed no difference between the lobar reduction cohort and the other historically comparable lung transplant patients from our institution (p=0.115). Percent predicted forced vital capacity and forced expiratory volume in 1 second at 3 months correlated with transplanted donor to recipient total lung capacity ratio, confirming the importance of correct sizing.

CONCLUSIONS

Anatomic lobar reduction in lung transplantation is a safe and effective means of transplanting pediatric and small adult recipients, and urgently listed patients.

Comparison of pulmonary function test and computed tomography volumetry in living lung donors

BACKGROUND

We previously proposed calculating forced vital capacity (FVC) by the number of segments for size matching in living-donor lobar lung transplantation (LDLLT). The primary purpose of this study was to compare spirometry-obtained calculations of lower lobe volumes with three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) volumetric images. Our second goal was to compare the data of pulmonary function tests with CT volumetry in living lung donors.

METHODS

Pulmonary function test, including FVC and total lung capacity (TLC), and 3D CT volumetry were performed pre-operatively in 21 healthy donor candidates for LDLLT. The relationship of 3D CT volumetric data and calculated volume of lower lobes by the number of segments was investigated. Also studied were 3D CT volumetric data in relation to FVC and TLC. Various pre-operative variables were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

According to 3D CT volumetry, the right and left lower lobe volume was 26.3% ± 2.9% and 22.6% ± 3.1% of the total lung volume, respectively. We found a significant, strong correlation between each lower lobe volume and the total lung volume. Because the calculated volumes of right and left lower lobes by the number of segments were 26.3% and 21.1%, respectively, our results implied that the volume of both lower lobes was accurately described by the number of segments. FVC was significantly associated with TLC and the total lung volume.

CONCLUSIONS

We confirmed that it would be justified to estimate graft FVC by the number of segments according to the CT volumetric data in LDLLT.

[Treatment of superior lobe central lung cancer with lung replantation]

背景与目的

肺癌患者行根治性全肺切除术后生活质量往往较差，最大限度地保留健康肺组织具有临床价值。本文报道3例自体肺再植在上叶中心型肺癌治疗中的应用和经验总结。

方法

本组共3例患者，肿瘤侵犯支气管或转移性淋巴结融合包绕、累及主肺动脉，肿瘤跨越斜裂侵及下叶边缘，先做完全性全肺切除术，体外低钾右旋糖酐液（low-potassium dextran, LPD）顺、逆行灌注后从离体标本中摘取可保留的下肺叶；下肺静脉再植于上肺静脉残端，按肺静脉、支气管、肺动脉顺序依次吻合。

结果

手术总时间220 min-250 min，下叶肺离体时间120 min-150 min；术后3 d-5 d拔除胸管，胸部X线示再植肺膨胀良好；术后随访4个月-8个月，完成3个或4个周期辅助化疗，患者生活质量良好。

结论

自体肺叶再植是一种可行的、可供选择的肺癌完全切除术式，是最大限度地切除病变和保留健康肺组织的理想术式。

[How to increase availability of grafts in lung transplantion: ex vivo lung reconditioning - cardiac death donors - high emergency list]

Lung transplantation has become an established treatment for end-stage pulmonary failure refractory to medical management. However, the scarcity of lung grafts and the growing number of candidates has led to an increase in deaths among patients on waiting lists. Despite improvements in donor management, organ preservation, and the use of marginal and cardiac death donors, only about 20% of candidate lungs are currently being transplanted. A new ex vivo "reconditioning" technique is opening up new perspectives. Indeed, a significant number of rejected lungs can now be retrieved and transplanted with acceptable results. Given the longer storage times provided by this technique, transplantation can be programmed, with better surgical efficiency. A new mobile organ-care machine is currently under evaluation. In near future, a pilot laboratory will be created and dedicated to ex vivo reconditionning of all lung grafts before transplantation and grafts will be sent to lung transplant centers after immunologic cross-matching.

Modified low-flow ultrafiltration ameliorates hemodynamics and early graft function and reduces blood loss in living-donor lobar lung transplantation

BACKGROUND

This study analyzed the clinical application of modified low-flow ultrafiltration (MUF) to minimize cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB)-related adverse effects in patients undergoing living-donor lobar lung transplantation (LDLLT).

METHOD

The study enrolled 33 consecutive patients who underwent LDLLT from 1999 to 2004: 8 patients underwent conventional CPB without MUF (control group), and 15 underwent arteriovenous MUF (MUF-treated group). Hemodynamics, graft function, blood loss and blood transfusion requirements, and clinical outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

There was a significant increase in systolic blood pressure and a decrease in pulmonary to systemic pressure ratio in the MUF-treated group (p < 0.05). No hemodynamic changes occurred in the control group. MUF resulted in significant improvements in arterial oxygen tension/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio (PaO(2)/FiO(2;) 411 +/- 107 vs 272 +/- 107 mm Hg, p < 0.05) and the alveolar-arterial oxygen difference (a-aDO(2); 158 +/- 84 vs 315 +/- 127 mm Hg, p < 0.05) at 15 minutes after CPB. There were no differences in PaO(2)/FiO(2) and A-aDO(2) between the groups beyond 6 hours post-operatively. Post-operative blood loss and blood transfusion requirements were lower in the MUF-treated group than in the control group (p < 0.05). There were no differences in survival, duration of ventilation, intensive care unit stay, and hospital stay between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The low-flow MUF brought improved hemodynamics and gas exchange capacity of transplanted grafts and lowered post-operative blood loss and blood transfusion requirement. This strategy may minimize CPB-related adverse effects in patients undergoing LDLLT.

[Lung transplantation: supply and demand in France]

INTRODUCTION

For a decade lung transplantation has suffered from a lack of donor organs which aroused a national debate and led to planned action in collaboration with The French National Agency for Transplantation.

BACKGROUND

Analysis of the stages of the process from potential donor to lung transplantation identified lung procurement as the main priority. An increase in the number of potential lung donors and revision of the acceptance criteria led to a doubling of the annual rate of lung transplantation in less than two years.

VIEWPOINTS

In the near future we may solve the problem of donor family refusals and establish scientifically based criteria for lung acceptance to increase the rate of lung transplantation. Transplantation from non heart-beating donors and the reconditioning of ex vivo non acceptable lungs might supply additional organs to fulfill demand in the long term.

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of lung transplantation activity in France doubled as the result of a dramatic increase of donor lung proposals. The current improvement in the results of lung transplantation might create new demands and generate future difficulties in the supply of donor lungs. New approaches, such as transplantation from non heart-beating donors and reconditioning ex vivo non acceptable lungs, should be examined in the near future.

Complications related to lobectomy in living lobar lung transplant donors

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate post-operative complications in living lobar lung transplant donors.

METHODS

Between September of 1999 and May of 2005, lobectomies were performed in 32 healthy lung transplant donors for 16 recipients. The medical charts of these donors were retrospectively analyzed in order to determine the incidence of postoperative complications and alterations in pulmonary function after lobectomy.

RESULTS

Twenty-two donors (68.75%) presented no complications. Among the 10 donors presenting complications, the most frequently observed complication was pleural effusion, which occurred in 5 donors (15.6% of the sample). Red blood cell transfusion was necessary in 3 donors (9.3%), and 2 donors underwent a second surgical procedure due to hemothorax. One donor presented pneumothorax after chest tube removal, and one developed respiratory infection. There were two intra-operative complications (6.25%): one donor required bronchoplasty of the middle lobe; and another required lingular resection. No intra-operative mortality was observed. Post-operative pulmonary function tests demonstrated an average reduction of 20% in forced expiratory volume in one second (p < 000.1) compared to pre-operative values.

CONCLUSIONS

Lobectomy in living lung transplant donors presents high risk of post-operative complications and irreversible impairment of pulmonary function. Careful pre-operative evaluation is necessary in order to reduce the incidence of complications in living lobar lung transplant donors.

Adult lung transplantation: technical considerations

The technical details of lung transplantation have seen considerable refinement with two decades of experience. Recent efforts to expand the donor pool are an exciting development. The technical details of donor organ procurement and the implantation are discussed here with a note to common pitfalls encountered.