1
|
Gil Barturen M, Laporta Hernández R, Romero Berrocal A, Pérez Redondo M, Gómez Lozano N, Martín López J, Royuela Vicente A, Romero Román A, Hoyos Mejía L, Crowley Carrasco S, Gómez de Antonio D, Naranjo Gómez JM, Córdoba Peláez M, Novoa NM, Campo-Cañaveral de la Cruz JL. Donor Lung Preservation at 10°C: Clinical and Logistical Impact. Arch Bronconeumol 2024:S0300-2896(24)00081-4. [PMID: 38644153 DOI: 10.1016/j.arbres.2024.03.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2023] [Revised: 02/24/2024] [Accepted: 03/31/2024] [Indexed: 04/23/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cold static donor lung preservation at 10°C appears to be a promising method to safely extend the cold ischemic time (CIT) and improve lung transplant (LTx) logistics. METHODS LTx from November 2021 to February 2023 were included in this single institution, prospective, non-randomized study comparing prolonged preservation at 10°C versus standard preservation on ice. The inclusion criteria for 10°C preservation were suitable grafts for LTx without any donor retrieval concerns. PRIMARY ENDPOINT primary graft dysfunction (PGD) grade-3 at 72-h. Secondary endpoints: clinical outcomes, cytokine profile and logistical impact. RESULTS Thirty-three out of fifty-seven cases were preserved at 10°C. Donor and recipient characteristics were similar across the groups. Total preservation times (h:min) were longer (p<0.001) in the 10°C group [1st lung: median 12:09 (IQR 9:23-13:29); 2nd: 14:24 (12:00-16:20)] vs. standard group [1st lung: median 5:47 (IQR 5:18-6:40); 2nd: 7:15 (6:33-7:40)]. PGD grade-3 at 72-h was 9.4% in 10°C group vs. 12.5% in standard group (p=0.440). Length of mechanical ventilation (MV), ICU and hospital stays were similar in both groups. Thirty and ninety-day mortality rates were 0% in 10°C group (vs. 4.2% in standard group). IL-8 concentration was significantly higher 6-h post-LTx in the standard group (p=0.025) and IL-10 concentration was increased 72-h post-LTx in the 10°C group (p=0.045). CONCLUSIONS Preservation at 10°C may represent a safe and feasible strategy to intentionally prolong the CIT. In our center, extending the CIT at 10°C may allow for semi-elective LTx and improve logistics with similar outcomes compared to the current standard preservation on ice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariana Gil Barturen
- Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Spain
| | | | | | - Marina Pérez Redondo
- Transplant Coordination and Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Spain
| | - Natalia Gómez Lozano
- Immunology Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Spain
| | - Javier Martín López
- Pathology Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Spain
| | - Ana Royuela Vicente
- Biostatistics Unit; Puerta de Hierro Biomedical Research Institute (IDIPHISA), CIBERESP, Madrid, Spain
| | - Alejandra Romero Román
- Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Spain
| | - Lucas Hoyos Mejía
- Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Spain
| | - Silvana Crowley Carrasco
- Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Spain
| | - David Gómez de Antonio
- Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Spain
| | - Jose Manuel Naranjo Gómez
- Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Spain
| | - Mar Córdoba Peláez
- Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Spain
| | - Nuria María Novoa
- Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Spain
| | - Jose Luis Campo-Cañaveral de la Cruz
- Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Spain; Universidad Europea de Madrid, Department of Medicine, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Romero Román A, Gil Barturen M, Crowley Carrasco S, Hoyos Mejía L, Naranjo Gómez JM, Córdoba Peláez M, Pérez Redondo M, Royuela Vicente A, García Fadul C, Gómez de Antonio D, Novoa NM, Campo-Cañaveral de la Cruz JL. Outcomes after lung transplantation from selected donors older than 70 years in a single centre: time to close the debate? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2024; 65:ezae077. [PMID: 38439563 DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezae077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Revised: 02/12/2024] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 03/06/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of lung transplantations using grafts from donors aged over 70 years against those performed using younger donors. METHODS This retrospective single-centre analysis includes lung transplants conducted at our institution from January 2014 to June 2022. Lung recipients were classified into 2 groups based on donor age (group A <70 years; group B ≥70 years). Variables regarding demographics, peri and postoperative outcomes and survival were included. The statistical analysis approach included univariable analysis, propensity score matching to address imbalances in donor variables (smoking status), recipient characteristics (sex, age, diagnosis and lung allocation score) and calendar period and survival analysis. RESULTS A total of 353 lung transplants were performed in this period, 47 (13.3%) using grafts from donors aged over 70 years. Donors in group B were more frequently women (70.2% vs 51.6%, P = 0.017), with less smoking history (22% vs 43%, P = 0.002) and longer mechanical ventilation time (3 vs 2 days, P = 0.025). Recipients in group B had a higher lung allocation score (37.5 vs 35, P = 0.035). Postoperative variables were comparable between both groups, except for pulmonary function tests. Group B demonstrated lower forced expiratory volume 1 s levels (2070 vs 2580 ml, P = 0.001). The propensity score matching showed a lower chance of chronic lung allograft dysfunction by 12% for group B. One-, three- and five-year survival was equal between the groups. CONCLUSIONS The use of selected expanded-criteria donors aged over 70 years did not result in increased postoperative morbidity, early mortality or survival in this study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alejandra Romero Román
- Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mariana Gil Barturen
- Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Silvana Crowley Carrasco
- Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Lucas Hoyos Mejía
- Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation Department, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jose Manuel Naranjo Gómez
- Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mar Córdoba Peláez
- Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Marina Pérez Redondo
- Transplant Coordinator, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ana Royuela Vicente
- Biostatistics Unit, Puerta de Hierro Biomedical Research Institute (IDIPHISA), CIBERESP, Madrid, Spain
| | - Christian García Fadul
- Pneumology Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - David Gómez de Antonio
- Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Nuria María Novoa
- Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jose Luis Campo-Cañaveral de la Cruz
- Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
- Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gil Barturen M, Laporta Hernández R, Romero Berrocal A, Pérez Redondo M, Romero Román A, Crowley Carrasco S, Hoyos Mejía L, Cordero Iglesias P, Naranjo Gómez JM, Córdoba Peláez M, Gómez de Antonio D, Campo-Cañaveral de la Cruz JL. Donor lungs cold preservation at 10 °C offers a potential logistic advantage in lung transplantation. Cir Esp 2022; 101:283-286. [PMID: 36417996 DOI: 10.1016/j.cireng.2022.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2022] [Revised: 10/04/2022] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Donor lung preservation at 10 °C appears to be an innovative and promising method that may improve transplant logistics by extending the cold ischemia time with excellent outcomes. We report the case of two lung transplants from two different donors involving the use of two different preservation methods, highlighting the benefits of using 10 °C lung storage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariana Gil Barturen
- Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Antonio Romero Berrocal
- Anesthesiology Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Marina Pérez Redondo
- Transplant Coordinator, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Alejandra Romero Román
- Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Silvana Crowley Carrasco
- Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Lucas Hoyos Mejía
- Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Pablo Cordero Iglesias
- Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jose Manuel Naranjo Gómez
- Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mar Córdoba Peláez
- Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - David Gómez de Antonio
- Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Barturen MG, Campo-Cañaveral de la Cruz JL, Crowley Carrasco S, Romero Román A, Hoyos Mejía L, Peyró M, Díaz Nuevo G, López García-Gallo C, Pérez Redondo M, Royuela Vicente A, Tanaka S, Naranjo Gómez JM, Córdoba Peláez M, Varela de Ugarte A, Gómez de Antonio D. Interrupted Versus Continuous Suture for Bronchial Anastomosis in Lung Transplantation: Does It Matter? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2022; 62:6747957. [PMID: 36193995 DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezac493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2022] [Revised: 09/21/2022] [Accepted: 10/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Bronchial anastomotic complications remain a major concern in lung transplantation. We aim to compare two different techniques, continuous versus interrupted suture by analyzing airway complications requiring intervention. METHODS Lung transplantations between January-2015 and December-2020 were included. Airway complications requiring intervention were classified following the 2018 ISHLT consensus and analyzed comparing three groups of patients according to surgical technique: Group A, both anastomosis performed with continuous suture; Group B, both with interrupted; and Group C, interrupted suture for one side and continuous suture for the contralateral side. RESULTS A total of 461 anastomoses were performed in 245 patients. The incidence of airway complications requiring intervention was 5.7% (95%CI 2.8; 8.6) per patient (14/245) and 3.7% (95%CI 2.0; 5.4) per anastomosis (17/461). Complications that required intervention were present in 5 out of 164 (3.1%) anastomosis with interrupted technique, and in 12/240 (5%) with continuous suture. No significant differences were found between techniques (p = 0.184). No statistical differences were found among Group A, B or C in terms of incidence of anastomotic complications, demographics, transplant outcomes or overall survival (log-rank p = 0.513). In a multivariable analysis, right laterality was significantly associated to complications requiring intervention (OR 3.7[CI 95%:1.1-12.3], p = 0.030). Endoscopic treatment was successful in 12 patients (85.7%). Retransplantation was necessary in two patients. CONCLUSION In summary, although it seems that anastomotic complications requiring intervention occur more frequently with continuous suture, there are no statistical differences compared to interrupted suture. Endoscopic treatment offers good outcomes in most of the airway complications after lung transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariana Gil Barturen
- Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda
| | | | - Silvana Crowley Carrasco
- Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda
| | - Alejandra Romero Román
- Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda
| | - Lucas Hoyos Mejía
- Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda
| | - María Peyró
- Thoracic Surgery Department, Hospital Universitario de Albacete
| | - Gema Díaz Nuevo
- Pneumology Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda
| | | | - Marina Pérez Redondo
- Transplant Coordination and Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda
| | - Ana Royuela Vicente
- Biostatistics Unit; Puerta de Hierro Biomedical Research Institute (IDIPHISA); CIBERESP, Madrid. Spain
| | | | - Jose Manuel Naranjo Gómez
- Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda
| | - Mar Córdoba Peláez
- Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda
| | - Andrés Varela de Ugarte
- Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda
| | - David Gómez de Antonio
- Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Campo-Cañaveral de la Cruz JL, Crowley Carrasco S, Tanaka S, Romero Román A, Hoyos Mejía L, Gil Barturen M, Sánchez Calle Á, García Fadul C, Aguilar Pérez M, Pérez Redondo M, Naranjo Gómez JM, Royuela A, Córdoba Peláez M, Varela de Ugarte A, Gómez de Antonio D. Lung transplantation from uncontrolled and controlled donation after circulatory death: similar outcomes to brain death donors. Transpl Int 2021; 34:2609-2619. [PMID: 34570381 DOI: 10.1111/tri.14120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2021] [Revised: 09/20/2021] [Accepted: 09/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Controlled donation after circulatory death donors (cDCD) are becoming a frequent source of lungs grafts worldwide. Conversely, lung transplantations (LTx) from uncontrolled donors (uDCD) are sporadically reported. We aimed to review our institutional experience using both uDCD and cDCD and compare to LTx from brain death donors (DBD). This is a retrospective analysis of all LTx performed between January 2013 and December 2019 in our institution. Donor and recipient characteristics were collected and univariate, multivariate and survival analyses were carried out comparing the three cohorts of donors. A total of 239 (84.7%) LTx were performed from DBD, 29 (10.3%) from cDCD and 14 (5%) from uDCD. There were no statistically significant differences in primary graft dysfunction grade 3 at 72 h, 30- and 90-day mortality, need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation after procedure, ICU and hospital length of stay, airway complications, CLAD incidence or survival at 1 and 3 years after transplant (DBD: 87.1% and 78.1%; cDCD: 89.7% and 89.7%; uDCD: 85.7% and 85.7% respectively; P = 0.42). Short- and mid-term outcomes are comparable between the three types of donors. These findings may encourage and reinforce all types of donation after circulatory death programmes as a valid and growing source of suitable organs for transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose Luis Campo-Cañaveral de la Cruz
- Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid., Madrid, Spain
| | - Silvana Crowley Carrasco
- Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid., Madrid, Spain
| | - Shin Tanaka
- Department of General Thoracic Surgery/Organ Transplant Center, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Alejandra Romero Román
- Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid., Madrid, Spain
| | - Lucas Hoyos Mejía
- Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid., Madrid, Spain
| | - Mariana Gil Barturen
- Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid., Madrid, Spain
| | - Álvaro Sánchez Calle
- Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid., Madrid, Spain
| | - Christian García Fadul
- Pneumology Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Myriam Aguilar Pérez
- Pneumology Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Marina Pérez Redondo
- Intensive Care Unit, Transplant Coordinator, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jose Manuel Naranjo Gómez
- Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid., Madrid, Spain
| | - Ana Royuela
- Biostatistics Unit, Puerta de Hierro Biomedical Research Institute (IDIPHISA), CIBERESP, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mar Córdoba Peláez
- Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid., Madrid, Spain
| | - Andrés Varela de Ugarte
- Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid., Madrid, Spain
| | - David Gómez de Antonio
- Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid., Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tanaka S, Campo-Cañaveral de la Cruz JL, Barturen MG, Carrasco SC, Román AR, León MTSD, Mejía LH, Gómez JMN, Peláez MC, Calle ÁS, Redondo MP, Fadul CG, Ugarte AVD, de-Antonio DG. Post-transplant outcomes of standard and extended criteria donation after circulatory death donor lungs categorized by donation after brain death lung criteria. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2021; 60:590-597. [PMID: 33693567 DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezab121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2020] [Revised: 02/02/2021] [Accepted: 02/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Most transplant centres use donation after brain death (DBD) criteria to assess the quality of controlled donation after circulatory death (cDCD) lungs. However, research on the relationship between DBD extended criteria and cDCD lung transplantation outcomes is limited. We investigated the outcomes of using DBD extended criteria donor organs in cDCD lung transplantation, compared to the standard criteria cDCD lung transplantation. METHODS A retrospective chart review of consecutive cDCD lung referrals to Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda from June 2013 to December 2019 was undertaken. Donors were divided into standard and extended criteria groups. Early outcomes after lung transplant were compared between these groups using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. RESULTS Thirty out of 91 cDCD donor lung offers were accepted for transplantation, of which 11 were from standard criteria donors and 19 were extended criteria donors. The baseline characteristics of the 2 recipient groups were similar. There were no differences in the rates of grade 3 primary graft dysfunction at 72 h after lung transplantation (21% vs 18%), duration of mechanical ventilation (48 h vs 36 h), total intensive care unit stay (10 days vs 7 days) and 1-year survival (89% vs 90%). CONCLUSIONS Carefully selecting cDCD lungs from outside the standard acceptability criteria may expand the existing donor pool with no detrimental effects on lung transplantation outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shin Tanaka
- Department of Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Mariana Gil Barturen
- Department of Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Silvana Crowley Carrasco
- Department of Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Alejandra Romero Román
- Department of Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - María Trujillo Sánchez de León
- Department of Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Lucas Hoyos Mejía
- Department of Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jose Manuel Naranjo Gómez
- Department of Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mar Córdoba Peláez
- Department of Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Álvaro Sánchez Calle
- Department of Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Marina Pérez Redondo
- Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Andrés Varela de Ugarte
- Department of Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - David Gómez- de-Antonio
- Department of Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tanaka S, Luis Campo-Cañaveral de la Cruz J, Crowley Carrasco S, Romero Román A, Hoyos Mejía L, Manuel NaranjoGómez J, Córdoba Peláez M, Sánchez Calle Á, Gil Barturen M, Pérez Redondo M, García Fadul C, Varela de Ugarte A, Gómez-de-Antonio D. Effect on the donor lungs of using abdominal normothermic regional perfusion in controlled donation after circulatory death. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2020; 59:ezaa398. [PMID: 33225359 DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezaa398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2020] [Revised: 08/21/2020] [Accepted: 08/22/2020] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Controlled donation after circulatory death (cDCD) donors are becoming a common source of organs for transplantation globally. However, the graft survival rate of cDCD abdominal organs is inferior to that of organs from brain-dead donors. The rapid retrieval (RR) technique is used by most donor organ procurement teams. The abdominal normothermic regional perfusion (A-NRP) technique has been implemented to minimize warm ischaemic damage to the abdominal organs. However, there is limited information on the effect of A-NRP on the quality of the donor lungs. This study aimed to compare lung transplantation outcomes using lungs procured from cDCD donors using the A-NRP and abdominal RR techniques. METHODS A single-centre retrospective analysis of consecutive transplant recipients of cDCD lungs from June 2013 to December 2019 was performed. The recipients were divided into 2 cohorts according to the abdominal procurement technique used. The recipient and donor characteristics (age, sex, cause of brain injury, warm ischaemic time, diagnosis, lung allocation score and other factors), incidence of primary graft dysfunction and early survival were monitored. RESULTS Twenty-eight consecutive lung transplantation recipients were identified (median age 59 years; 61% male); 14 recipients received lungs using the A-NRP and 14 using abdominal RR for abdominal organ retrieval. There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics, primary graft dysfunction (P = 0.70), hospital mortality (P = 1.0) and 1-year survival rate (P = 1.0) between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS No difference was observed in lung transplantation outcomes irrespective of the abdominal organ procurement technique used (A-NRP or abdominal RR).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shin Tanaka
- Department of Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Silvana Crowley Carrasco
- Department of Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Alejandra Romero Román
- Department of Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Lucas Hoyos Mejía
- Department of Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jose Manuel NaranjoGómez
- Department of Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mar Córdoba Peláez
- Department of Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Álvaro Sánchez Calle
- Department of Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mariana Gil Barturen
- Department of Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Marina Pérez Redondo
- Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Christian García Fadul
- Department of Pneumology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Andrés Varela de Ugarte
- Department of Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - David Gómez-de-Antonio
- Department of Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|