Lobe-specific extent of systematic lymph node dissection for non-small cell lung carcinomas according to a retrospective study of metastasis and prognosis

The prognostic significance of right paratracheal lymph node dissection numbers in right upper lobe non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The number of dissected lymph nodes is closely related to the prognosis of patients with non-small cell lung cancer. This study explored the optimal number of right paratracheal lymph nodes dissected in right upper non-small cell lung cancer patients and its impact on prognosis.

METHODS

Patients who underwent radical surgery for right upper lobe cancer between 2012 and 2017 were retrospectively enrolled. The optimal number of right paratracheal lymph nodes and the relationship between the number of dissected right paratracheal lymph nodes and the prognosis of right upper non-small cell lung cancer were analysed.

RESULTS

A total of 241 patients were included. The optimal number of dissected right paratracheal lymph nodes was 6. The data were divided according to the number of dissected right paratracheal lymph nodes into groups RPLND + (≥ 6) and RPLND- (< 6). In the stage II and III patients, the 5-year overall survival rates were 39.0% and 48.2%, respectively (P = 0.033), and the 5-year recurrence-free survival rates were 32.8% and 41.8%, respectively (P = 0.043). Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that among the stage II and III patients, ≥ 6 right paratracheal dissected lymph nodes was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (HR = 0.53 95% CI 0.30-0.92 P = 0.025) and recurrence-free survival (HR = 1.94 95% CI 1.16-3.24 P = 0.011).

CONCLUSIONS

Resection of 6 or more right paratracheal lymph nodes may be associated with an improved prognosis in patients with right upper non-small cell lung cancer, especially in patients with stage II or III disease.

Lymph node dissection in small peripheral lung cancer: Supplemental analysis of JCOG0802/WJOG4607L

OBJECTIVE

The optimal region of lymph node dissection (LND) during segmentectomy in patients with small peripheral non-small cell lung cancer requires clarification. Through a supplemental analysis of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) 0802/West Japan Oncology Group (WJOG) 4607L, we investigated the associated factors, distribution, and recurrence pattern of lymph node metastases (LNMs) and proposed the optimal LND region.

METHODS

Of the 1106 patients included in the JCOG0802/WJOG4607L, 1056 patients with LNDs were included in this supplemental analysis. We investigated the distribution and recurrence pattern of LNMs along with the radiologic findings (with ground-glass opacity, part-solid tumor; without ground-grass opacity component, pure-solid tumor).

RESULTS

The radiologic findings were the only significant factor for LNMs. Of 533 patients with part-solid tumors, 8 (1.5%) had LNMs. Further, only 3 (0.5%) patients had pN2 disease, and no patients had interlobar LNMs from nonadjacent segments. Of the 523 patients with pure-solid tumors, 55 (10.5%) had LNMs, and 28 (5.4%) had pN2 disease. Five patients had metastases to nonadjacent interlobar lymph nodes (LNs). Two (2.0%) patients with S6 tumors had upper mediastinal LNMs. In addition, the incidence of mediastinal LN recurrence in patients with S6 lung cancer was greater in those who underwent selective LND than those who underwent systematic LND (P = .0455).

CONCLUSIONS

Nonadjacent interlobar and mediastinal LND have little impact on pathologic nodal staging in patients with part-solid tumors. In contrast, selective LND is recommended at least for patients with pure-solid tumors.

Investigation of mediastinal lymph node dissection in clinical stage IA pure-solid non-small cell lung cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

To explore the independent predictors of pathological mediastinal lymph node (pN2) metastasis in clinical stage IA (cIA) pure-solid non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, and to find an appropriate method of mediastinal lymph node dissection.

METHODS

This study retrospectively evaluated 533 cIA pure-solid NSCLC patients who underwent radical resection of lung cancer (lobectomy combined with systematic lymph node dissection) from January 2014 to December 2016. The relationship between clinicopathological characteristics and pN2 metastasis was analyzed, and the independent predictors of pN2 metastasis were determined by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. We defined the new factor Y as composed of preoperative cT, CEA, and NSE.

RESULTS

There were 72 cases (13.5%) of pN2 metastasis in cIA pure-solid NSCLC patients. Preoperative clinical tumor diameter (cT), serum CEA level, serum NSE level, and pathological status of station 10 lymph nodes were independent predictors of pN2 metastasis. Patients with cT ≤ 21.5 mm, CEA ≤ 3.85 ng/mL, NSE ≤ 13.40 ng/mL and negative station 10 lymph node group showed lower rates of pN2 metastasis. The new factor Y was an independent predictor of pN2 metastasis. Only 3 (2.1%) of 143 patients in the Y low-risk group showed pN2 metastasis.

CONCLUSION

For patients with low risk of pN2 metastasis, it might be feasible to take lobe-specific lymph node sampling or systematic lymph node sampling. As for those with high risk of pN2 metastasis, systematic lymph node dissection would be recommended.

Prognostic significance of ground-glass areas within tumours in non-small-cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

To validate or refute the hypothesis that non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLC) with ground-glass areas (GGA+) within the tumour on high-resolution computed tomography are associated with a more favourable prognosis than those without GGA (GGA-).

METHODS

We analysed data from a multicentre observational cohort study in Japan including 5005 patients with completely resected pathological stage I NSCLC, who were excluded from the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) 0707 trial on oral adjuvant treatment during the enrolment period. The patients' medical and pathological records were assessed retrospectively by physicians and re-staged according to the 8th tumour, node, metastasis edition.

RESULTS

Of the 5005 patients, 2388 (48%) were ineligible for the JCOG0707 trial and 2617 (52%) were eligible but were not enrolled. A total of 958 patients (19.1%) died. Patients with GGA+ NSCLC and pathological invasion ≤3 cm showed significantly better overall survival than others. In patients with tumours with an invasive portion ≤4 cm, GGA+ was associated with better survival. The prognoses of patients with GGA+ T2a and GGA- T1c tumours were similar (5-year overall survival: 84.6% vs 83.1%, respectively). The survival with T2b or more tumours appeared unaffected by GGA, and GGA was not prognostic in these larger tumours.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with GGA+ NSCLC on high-resolution computed tomography and ≤4 cm invasion size may have a better prognosis than patients with solid GGA- tumours of the same T-stage. However, the presence or absence of radiological GGA has little impact on the prognosis of patients with NSCLC with greater (>4 cm) pathological invasion.

Segmentectomy versus lobectomy in small-sized peripheral non-small-cell lung cancer with radiologically pure-solid appearance in Japan (JCOG0802/WJOG4607L): a post-hoc supplemental analysis of a multicentre, open-label, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Although segmentectomy was better than lobectomy in terms of overall survival for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with a pure-solid tumour appearance on thin-section CT in the open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 JCOG0802/WJOG4607L trial, the reasons why segmentectomy was associated with better overall survival were unclear. We aimed to compare the survival, cause of death, and recurrence patterns after segmentectomy versus lobectomy in trial participants with NSCLC with a pure-solid appearance METHODS: We conducted a post-hoc supplemental analysis of the JCO0802/WJOG4607L randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial for the patients (aged 20-85 years) with small-sized NSCLC with radiologically pure-solid appearance on thin-section CT (≤2 cm, consolidation tumour ratio 1·0). The primary aim was to compare the overall and relapse-free survival, cause of death, and recurrence patterns associated with segmentectomy and lobectomy for patients with radiologically pure-solid NSCLC to determine why the overall survival of segmentectomy was superior to that of lobectomy, even for oncologically invasive lung cancers. JCO0802/WJOG4607L is registered with the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry, UMIN000002317, and is complete.

FINDINGS

Between Aug 10, 2009, and Oct 21, 2014, 1106 patients were randomly assigned to undergo either lobectomy or segmentectomy. Of these participants, 553 (50%) had radiologically pure-solid NSCLC and were eligible for this post-hoc supplemental analysis. Of these 553 participants, 274 (50%) patients underwent lobectomy and 279 (50%) underwent segmentectomy. Median patient age was 67 years (IQR 61-73), 347 (63%) of 553 patients were male and 206 (37%) were female, and data on race and ethnicity were not collected. As of data cutoff (June 13, 2020), after a median follow-up of 7·3 years (IQR 6·0-8·5), the 5-year overall survival rate was significantly higher after segmentectomy than after lobectomy (86·1% [95% CI 81·4-89·7] in the lobectomy group, with 55 deaths vs 92·4% [88·6-95·0] in the segmentectomy group, with 38 deaths; hazard ratio (HR) 0·64 [95% CI 0·41-0·97]; log-rank test p=0·033), whereas the 5-year relapse-free survival was similar between the groups (81·7% [95% CI 76·5-85·8], with 34 events vs 82·0% [76·9-86·0], with 52 events; HR 1·01 [95% CI 0·72-1·42]; p=0·94). Deaths after a median follow-up of 7·3 years due to lung cancer occurred in 20 (7%) of 274 patients after lobectomy and 19 (7%) of 279 after segmentectomy, and deaths due to other causes occurred in 35 (13%) patients after lobectomy compared with 19 (7%) after segmentectomy (lung cancer death vs other cause of death, p=0·19). The locoregional recurrence was higher after segmentectomy (21 [8%] vs 45 [16%]; p=0·0021). In subgroup analyses, better 5-year overall survival after segmentectomy than after lobectomy was observed in the subgroup of patients aged 70 years or older (77·1% [95% CI 68·2-83·8] with lobectomy vs 85·6% [77·5-90·9] with segmentectomy; p=0·013) and in male patients (80·5% [73·7-85·7] vs 92·1% [87·0-95·2]; p=0·0085). By contrast, better 5-year relapse-free survival after lobectomy than after segmentectomy was observed in the subgroup younger than 70 years (87·4% [95% CI 81·2-91·7] with lobectomy vs 84·4% [77·9-89·1] with segmentectomy; p=0·049) and in female patients (94·2% [87·6-97·4] vs 82·2% [73·2-88·4]; p=0·047).

INTERPRETATION

This post-hoc analysis showed improved overall survival after segmentectomy in patients with pure-solid NSCLC compared with lobectomy. However, survival outcomes of segmentectomy depend on the patient's age and sex. Given the results of this exploratory analysis, further research is necessary to determine clinically relevant indications for segmentectomy in radiologically pure-solid NSCLC.

FUNDING

Japanese National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund and Practical Research for Innovative Cancer Control Fund, and a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare of Japan.

A Shift in Paradigm: Selective Lymph Node Dissection for Minimizing Oversurgery in Early Stage Lung Cancer

Systematic lymph node dissection has been widely accepted and turned into a standard procedure for lung cancer surgery. In recent years, the concept of "minimal invasive surgery (MIS)" has greatly changed the surgical paradigm of lung cancer. Previous studies revealed that excessive dissection of lymph nodes without metastases had uncertain clinical benefit. Meanwhile, it leads to the elevated risk of postoperative complications including chylothorax and laryngeal nerve injury. In addition, dissection of nonmetastatic lymph nodes may disturb systematic immunity, resulting in the secondary effect on primary tumor or latent metastases. The past decades have witnessed the innovative strategies such as lobe-specific lymph node dissection and selective lymph node dissection. On the basis of evolution of lymph node dissection strategy, we discuss the negative effects of excessive nonmetastatic lymph node dissection and summarize the recent advances in the optimized dissection strategies, hoping to provide unique perspectives on the future directions.

Extent of Lymph Node Dissection in Patients with Small-Sized Peripheral Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer during Intentional Segmentectomy

PURPOSE

Segmentectomy and mediastinal lymph node dissection (MLND) are becoming standard procedures for small-sized (<2 cm) peripheral non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although the benefits of the less resected lung are proven, the extent of lymph node dissection remains unchanged.

METHODS

We studied 422 patients who underwent lobectomy with MLND (lobe specific or systemic) for small peripheral NSCLC with clinical N0 disease. Patients with middle lobectomy (n = 39) and a consolidation-to-tumor (C/T) ratio ≤0.50 (n = 33) were excluded. We investigated the clinical factors, lymph node metastasis distributions, and lymph node recurrence patterns of 350 patients.

RESULTS

Thirty-five (10.0%) patients had lymph node metastasis; none with C/T ratio <0.75 had lymph node metastasis and lymph node recurrence. None had solitary lymph node metastasis in the outside lobe-specific MLND. Six patients had mediastinal lymph node metastasis at the initial site of recurrence; none had mediastinal lymph node recurrence outside the lobe-specific MLND, except for two patients with S6 primary disease.

CONCLUSION

NSCLC patients with small peripheral tumors and a C/T ratio <0.75 during segmentectomy may not require MLND. The optimal MLND for patients with a C/T ratio ≥0.75, except for those with S6 primary, may be lobe-specific MLND.

A multicenter propensity score-matched analysis of lymphadenectomy in N1-positve lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

Selective mediastinal lymph node dissection based on lobe-specific metastases is widely recognized in daily practice. However, the significance of mediastinal lymph node dissection for N1-positive tumors has not been elucidated.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 359 patients with N1-positive lung cancer who underwent lobectomy with systematic mediastinal lymph node dissection (systematic lymph node dissection) (n = 150) and lobe-specific mediastinal lymph node dissection (lobe-specific lymph node dissection) (n = 209). The operative and postoperative results and their propensity score-matched pairs were compared. The factors affecting survival were assessed using competing risk and multivariable analyses.

RESULTS

The cumulative incidence of recurrence and the cumulative incidence of cancer-specific death were not significantly different between systematic and lobe-specific lymph node dissection in entire cohort. In the propensity score-matched cohort (83 pairs), systematic lymph node dissection tended to detect N2 lymph node metastasis more frequently (55.4 vs. 41%, P = 0.087). Eleven patients (13.2%) in the systematic lymph node dissection group had a metastatic N2 lymph node 'in the systematic lymph node dissection field' that lobe-specific lymph node dissection did not dissect. The oncological outcomes between patients undergoing systematic lymph node dissection (5-year cumulative incidence of recurrence, 62.1%; 5-year cumulative incidence of cancer-specific death, 27.9%) and lobe-specific lymph node dissection (5-year cumulative incidence of recurrence, 60.1%; 5-year cumulative incidence of cancer-specific death, 23.3%) were similar. The propensity score-adjusted multivariable analysis for cumulative incidence of recurrence revealed that the prognosis associated with systematic lymph node dissection was comparable with the prognosis with lobe-specific lymph node dissection (hazard ratio, 1.17; 95% confidence interval, 0.82-1.67; P = 0.37).

CONCLUSIONS

The extent of lymph node dissection can affect accurate pathological staging; however, it was not associated with survival outcome in the treatment of N1-positive lung cancer.

Effect of Surgical Treatment for N2-Positive c-stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma in the "PACIFIC" Era

BACKGROUND

The PACIFIC trial findings drastically changed the c-stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment strategy. However, it remains uncertain whether surgery is no longer needed for treatment. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of surgery and explore the prognostic factors of better outcomes in surgery-treated patients than in PACIFIC regimen-treated patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 2010 to 2020, 107 patients with clinical N2-stage III NSCLC underwent lung resection in our institute. We analyzed and compared the yearly postoperative overall survival (OS) benchmarks of these patients to those of patients treated in the PACIFIC trial.

RESULTS

The 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-year OS rates of patients were 87.7%, 73.9%, 64.9%, 58.2%, and 55.4%, respectively, all of which were superior to those of PACIFIC regimen-treated patients. However, patients with cT3/T4 tumors and skip, multistation, distant, and bulky N2 metastases, as well as those who underwent bronchoplasty, showed inferior results in several yearly benchmarks than in PACIFIC regimen-treated patients. Multivariate analyses conducted among factors mentioned above showed that cT3/T4 tumor was a worse prognostic factor for surgery-treated patients than for PACIFIC regimen-treated patients (hazard ratio [HR] 1.89, P = .036). Distant N2 metastasis was also a worse prognostic factor, although its effect was not statistically significant (HR 1.81, P = .082).

CONCLUSION

Surgery remains the mainstay of N2-positive c-stage III NSCLC treatment, and the PACIFIC regimen may be suitable only for patients with unresectable disease. However, surgery should be cautiously considered for patients with cT3/4 disease.

The number of metastatic lymph nodes is more predictive of prognosis than location-based N stage for nonsmall cell lung cancer: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The eighth edition of nodal classification is defined only by the anatomical location of metastatic lymph nodes and has limited prognostic discrimination power. The authors aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance and discriminatory capability of the number of metastatic lymph nodes (nN) in resected nonsmall cell lung cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with stage IA to IIIB resected nonsmall cell lung cancer between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2013 were analyzed as a Chinese cohort. The optimal thresholds for the nN classification were determined by the X-tile. The receiver operating characteristic curve, net reclassification improvement and standardized net benefit calculated by decision curve analysis was estimated to quantify the nN classification's performance in prognostic stratification. External validation in the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database was performed to test the robustness of the nN classification.

RESULTS

Both cohorts showed a stepwise prognosis deterioration with increasing nN. One to three, four to six, and more than six were selected as optimal thresholds of nN classification in the Chinese cohort, which included 4432 patients, then validated in the SEER cohort ( n =28 022 patients). Multivariate Cox analysis showed the nN classification was an independent predictive factor for overall survival in both cohorts (Chinese cohort and SEER cohort: N 0 vs. N 1-3 , P <0.001; N 0 vs. N 3-6 , P <0.001; N 0 vs. N >6 , P <0.001). And prognostic discriminatory capability was improved in the nN classification compared with location-based N classification [5-year NRI score, 0.106 (95% CI: 0.049-0.132) and 5-year time-independent AUC, 0.593 (95% CI: 0.560-0.625) vs. 0.554 (95% CI: 0.520-0.588), P <0.001].

CONCLUSIONS

The nN classification tended to be a superior prognostic indicator than the location-based N classification. The number of metastatic lymph nodes should be considered in the future revision of the TNM system.

True Prevalence of Unforeseen N2 Disease in NSCLC: A Systematic Review + Meta-Analysis

Patients with unforeseen N2 (uN2) disease are traditionally considered to have an unfavorable prognosis. As preoperative and intraoperative mediastinal staging improved over time, the prevalence of uN2 changed. In this review, the current evidence on uN2 disease and its prevalence will be evaluated. A systematic literature search was performed to identify all studies or completed, published trials that included uN2 disease until 6 April 2023, without language restrictions. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to score the included papers. A total of 512 articles were initially identified, of which a total of 22 studies met the predefined inclusion criteria. Despite adequate mediastinal staging, the pooled prevalence of true unforeseen pN2 (9387 patients) was 7.97% (95% CI 6.67-9.27%), with a pooled OS after five years (892 patients) of 44% (95% CI 31-58%). Substantial heterogeneity regarding the characteristics of uN2 disease limited our meta-analysis considerably. However, it seems patients with uN2 disease represent a subcategory with a similar prognosis to stage IIb if complete surgical resection can be achieved, and the contribution of adjuvant therapy is to be further explored.

Selective Mediastinal Lymph Node Dissection Strategy for Clinical T1N0 Invasive Lung Cancer: A Prospective, Multicenter, Clinical Trial

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to prospectively evaluate our previously proposed selective mediastinal lymph node (LN) dissection strategy for peripheral clinical T1N0 invasive NSCLC.

METHODS

This is a multicenter, prospective clinical trial in China. We set six criteria for predicting negative LN stations and finally guiding selective LN dissection. Consolidation tumor ratio less than or equal to 0.5, segment location, lepidic-predominant adenocarcinoma (LPA), negative hilar nodes (stations 10-12), and negative visceral pleural invasion (VPI) were used separately or in combination as predictors of negative LN status in the whole, superior, or inferior mediastinal zone. LPA, hilar node involvement, and VPI were diagnosed intraoperatively. All patients actually underwent systematic mediastinal LN dissection. The primary end point was the accuracy of the strategy in predicting LN involvement. If LN metastasis occurred in certain mediastinal zone that was predicted to be negative, it was considered as an "inaccurate" case.

RESULTS

A total of 720 patients were enrolled. The median number of LN dissected was 15 (interquartile range: 11-20). All negative node status in certain mediastinal zone was correctly predicted by the strategy. Compared with final pathologic findings, the accuracy of frozen section to diagnose LPA, VPI, and hilar node metastasis was 94.0%, 98.9%, and 99.6%, respectively. Inaccurate intraoperative diagnosis of LPA, VPI, or hilar node metastasis did not lead to inaccurate prediction of node-negative status.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first prospective trial validating the specific mediastinal LN metastasis pattern in cT1N0 invasive NSCLC, which provides important evidence for clinical applications of selective LN dissection strategy.

Comparison of the Outcomes between Systematic Lymph Node Dissection and Lobe-Specific Lymph Node Dissection for Stage I Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

This study compares the surgical and long-term outcomes, including disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS), between lobe-specific lymph node dissection (L-SND) and systematic lymph node dissection (SND) among patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 107 patients diagnosed with clinical stage I NSCLC undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy (exclusion of the right middle lobe) from January 2011 to December 2018 were enrolled. The patients were assigned to the L-SND (n = 28) and SND (n = 79) groups according to the procedure performed on them. Demographics, perioperative data, and surgical and long-term oncological outcomes were collected and compared between the L-SND and SND groups.

RESULTS

The mean follow-duration was 60.6 months. The demographic data and surgical outcomes and long-term oncological outcomes were not significantly different between the two groups. The 5-year OS of the L-SND and SND groups was 82% and 84%, respectively. The 5-year DFS of the L-SND and SND groups was 70% and 65%, respectively. The 5-year CSS of the L-SND and SND groups was 80% and 86%, respectively. All the surgical and long-term outcomes were not statistically different between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

L-SND showed comparable surgical and oncologic outcomes with SND for clinical stage I NSCLC. L-SND could be a treatment choice for stage I NSCLC.

The impact of dissection of station 9 on survival and the necessity of pulmonary ligament division during upper lobectomy for lung cancer

BACKGROUND

We conducted this study to investigate the need for dissection of station 9 lymph nodes during upper lobectomy for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to find out the operative results of inferior pulmonary ligament division.

METHODS

A total of 840 patients who underwent upper lobectomy for NSCLC between January 2007 and June 2020 were evaluated retrospectively. The patients were separated into two groups - those having undergone lymph node dissection of station 9 and inferior pulmonary ligament dissection (Group I) and those who did not (Group II). In these groups, the prognostic value of station 9 lymph nodes and postoperative effects (drainage time, prolonged air leak, dead space and length of hospital stay) of ligament division or preservation were analyzed.

RESULTS

The number of patients with station 9 lymph node metastasis was only one (0.1%) and that was multi-station pN2 disease. Station 9 lymph nodes were found in 675 (80.4%) patients, while 22 (2.6%) patients had no lymph nodes in the dissected material. In the other 143 (17%) patients, the inferior pulmonary ligament and station 9 were not dissected. While 5-year survival was 64.9% in 697 patients of Group I, it was 61.3% in 143 patients of Group II (p = 0.56). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in postoperative effects of ligament division or preservation.

CONCLUSIONS

In upper lobectomies, status of station 9 does not have a significant impact on patients' survival and lymph node staging. Additionally, preservation or division of the inferior pulmonary ligament has no significant advantage or disadvantage.

Lobe-Specific Lymph Node Dissection May be Feasible for Clinical N0 Solid-Predominant Part-Solid Lung Adenocarcinoma With Solid Component Diameter ≤ 2 cm

BACKGROUND

Lymph node (LN) involvement was not rare in patients with radiological solid-predominant part-solid nodules (PSNs). The lymph node dissection (LND) strategy remained unclear.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Six hundred seventy-two patients with clinical N0 solid-predominant PSNs (0.5 < consolidation-to-tumor ratio < 1) receiving systematic LND (development cohort, n = 598) or limited LND (validation cohort A, n = 74) at 2 Chinese institutions from 2008 to 2016 were collected. The development cohort was utilized to investigate the incidence and pattern of LN metastasis. Lobe-specific LN metastasis pattern was defined as superior mediastinal LN involvement from upper-lobe tumor or inferior mediastinal LN involvement from lower-lobe tumor. To further validate the LN metastasis pattern observed in the development cohort, validation cohort B consisting of 7273 patients with primary lung adenocarcinomas who received surgery from 2016 to 2021 was identified. The clinical outcomes between the development cohort and validation cohort A were compared in order to assess the feasibility of limited LND.

RESULTS

LN involvement rate for solid-predominant PSNs was 10.0%. Larger solid component diameter (P = .005) was independently associated with increased risk of LN involvement. In upper/lower lobes solid-predominant PSNs with solid component diameter ≤ 2 cm, a lobe-specific LN involvement pattern was identified. Further validation indicated that the observed mediastinal LN involvement pattern was generalizable, and the oncologic outcomes did not vary by the extent of LND in solid-predominant PSNs with solid component diameter ≤ 2 cm.

CONCLUSION

Lobe-specific LND might be feasible for solid-predominant PSNs with solid component diameter ≤ 2 cm. For other solid-predominant PSNs, systematic LND should be recommended.

Lobe-specific lymph node dissection in early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer: An overview

Lymph node dissection is a vital part of surgical treatment for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Lobectomy with systematic lymph node dissection (SLND) still remains the gold standard surgical treatment for early-stage NSCLC patients. However, an increasing number of studies have demonstrated that lobe-specific lymph node dissection (L-SLND) can be used as an alternative therapy for SLND in carefully selected patients with early-stage NSCLC. However, there are no currently available evidences of review summarizing the role of L-SLDN in treating early-stage NSCLC. Therefore, we performed this literature review by summarizing the existing literatures on the lymph node drainage pattern, definition, scope and role of L-SLND in patients with early-stage NSCLC, aiming to provide evidence for the application of L-SLND in patients with early-stage NSCLC.

Lymph node sampling-what are the numbers?

Lung cancer is a deadly disease. Lymph node staging is the most important prognostic factor, and lymphatic drainage of the lung is complex. Major advances have been made in this field over the last several decades, but there is much left to understand and improve upon. Herein, we review the history of the lymphatic system and the creation of lymph node maps, the evolution of tumor, node, and metastasis lung cancer classification, the importance of lung cancer staging, techniques for lymph node dissection, and our recommendations regarding a minimum number of nodes to sample during pulmonary resection.

The comparison of Lobe-Specific or Systematic Mediastinal Lymph Node Dissection for Early-Stage Lung Adenocarcinoma With Consolidation Tumor Ratio Over 0.5

INTRODUCTION

Surgery is the most effective treatment for early-stage lung cancer. This study will propose a personalized plan for mediastinal lymph node dissection in early-stage lung adenocarcinoma to reduce the risk of surgery and improve the quality of life.

METHODS

This study retrospectively analyzed the patients underwent lobectomy and lymph node dissection in the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University. Clinical stage I lung adenocarcinoma patients with solid component ratio (CTR) between 0.5 and 1 were included. Patients were divided into systematic (S-MLND) and lobe-specific (L-MLND) mediastinal lymph node dissection groups. The days of hospitalization, the presence or absence of complications, the recurrence-free survival rate, and the overall survival rate were calculated to evaluate the postoperative quality and operation risk of the patients.

RESULTS

210 patients (138 L-MLND and 72 S-MLND) were included. 2 lymph node metastases appeared in the S-MLND group while none in the L-MLND group (P = .049). No differences were shown in age, tumor site, size, solid component, degree of tumor invasion, and stage. The proportion of patients with severe postoperative cough and the length of hospital stay in the L-MLND group decreased. The 5-year OS of the entire cohort was 98.1%, 98.6% in L-MLND, compared with 97.2% in S-MLND; RFS was 94.8%, 95.7% in L-MLND, compared with 93.0% in S-MLND.

CONCLUSION

For cIA lung adenocarcinoma, according to the Thin-slice CT within 1 month before the operation, if the main lesion was less than 3 cm and CTR over 0.5, L-MLND is as effective as S-MLND.

Sentinel Lymph Node in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Assessment of Feasibility and Safety by Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging and Clinical Consequences

Occult micrometastases can be missed by routine pathological analysis. Mapping of the pulmonary lymphatic system by near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence imaging can identify the first lymph node relay. This sentinel lymph node (SLN) can be analyzed by immunohistochemistry (IHC), which may increase micrometastasis detection and improve staging. This study analyzed the feasibility and safety of identifying SLNs in thoracic surgery by NIR fluorescence imaging in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This was a prospective, observational, single-center study. Eighty adult patients with suspected localized stage NSCLC (IA1 to IIA) were included between December 2020 and May 2022. All patients received an intraoperative injection of indocyanine green (ICG) directly in the peri tumoural area or by electromagnetic navigational bronchoscopy (ENB). The SLN was then assessed using an infrared fluorescence camera. SLN was identified in 60 patients (75%). Among them, 36 SLNs associated with a primary lung tumor were analyzed by IHC. Four of them were invaded by micrometastases (11.1%). In the case of pN0 SLN, the rest of the lymphadenectomy was cancer free. The identification of SLNs in thoracic surgery by NIR fluorescence imaging seems to be a feasible technique for improving pathological staging.

Pathologic node-negative lung cancer: Adequacy of lymph node yield and a tool to assess the risk of occult nodal disease

INTRODUCTION

Accurate lymph node (LN) staging is crucial for prognostication in NSCLC. Diagnosis of pN0 disease is based on the absence of positive LNs, irrespective of the number of LNs excised, and is thus susceptible to sampling error. Tumors that are assumed to be pN0 may in fact be understaged. We developed a tool to quantify the risk of occult nodal disease (OND) among patients with pN0 NSCLC in terms of the number of LNs examined.

METHODS

Patients treated surgically for stage I-III primary NSCLC between 2004 and 2014 (n = 49,356) were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. The probability of missing a positive node in terms of the number of LNs examined was modeled using a beta-binomial model. A mathematical tool was then used to calculate the negative predictive value (NPV) corresponding to the number of LNs examined. Ranging from 0 to 100%, higher NPV reflects greater confidence in the pN0 diagnosis and a lower probability of OND.

RESULTS

The median number of LNs examined was 7 for N0, 10 for N1/N2, and 8 for N3 disease. The probability of missing a positive node decreased as LNs examined increased. Additionally, higher T stage required more LNs to confirm an N0 diagnosis. After accounting for false-negative diagnoses, the prevalence of node-positive disease was readjusted from 16% to 22% among patients with T1 disease. According to our tool, with 10 LNs examined, the NPV was 85% (15% probability of OND) for a patient with T3 disease, compared with 95% (5% probability of OND) for a patient with T1 disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Accurate pN0 diagnosis depends on the number of LNs examined. The proposed tool offers the ability to quantify, in a patient-specific manner, the confidence in a diagnosis of node-negative disease on the basis of the number of LNs examined.

Intraoperative ultrasound: "Alternative eye" in lymph nodal dissection in non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Staging of the mediastinum lymph nodes involvement in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is an important prognostic factor determining the most appropriate multimodality treatment plan. The objective of this study is to assess ultrasound characteristics of mediastinal lymph nodes metastasis and effectiveness of intraoperative ultrasound-guided mediastinal nodal dissection in patients with resected NSCLC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy and pulmonary lymphadenectomy from November 2020 to March 2022 at the thoracic surgery department of the Vanvitelli University of Naples underwent intraoperative ultrasound-guided mediastinal lymph nodal dissection.

RESULTS

This study evaluates whether individual B-mode features and a compounding thereof can be used to accurately and reproducibly predict lymph node malignancy.

DISCUSSION

Intraoperative ultrasound, during systematic mediastinal lymph node dissection, is helpful in preventing lesion to mediastinal structures. Pathological nodal sonographic characteristics are round shape, short-axis diameter, echogenicity, margin, the absence or presence of coagulation necrosis sign, and the absence or presence of central hilar structure, increased color Doppler flow, the absence or presence of calcification, and nodal conglomeration. Operating time was not substantially prolonged. The procedure is simple, safe and highly accurate.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasonic techniques allow surgeons to detect the relationship between lymph nodes and surrounding large blood vessels during biopsy, improving the safety and simplicity of the operation, increasing the number of harvested lymph nodes, and reducing the risk of intraoperative injury; it is a fast, easily reproducible, and inexpensive method.

Visualization of patterns of lymph node metastases in non-small cell lung cancer using network analysis

Objective

We aimed to visualize complicated patterns of lymph node metastases in surgically resected non-small cell lung cancer by applying a data mining technique.

Methods

In this retrospective study, 783 patients underwent lobectomy or pneumonectomy with systematic mediastinal lymph node dissection for non-small cell lung cancer between January 2010 and December 2018. Surgically resected lymph nodes were classified according to the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer lymph node map. Network analysis generated patterns of lymph node metastases from stations 1 to 14, and the degree of connection between 2 lymph node stations was assessed.

Results

The median number of lymph nodes examined per patient was 20, and the pathological N category was pN0 in 428 cases, pN1 in 132, pN2 in 221, and pN3 in 2. N1 lymph node stations had strong associations with superior mediastinal lymph node stations for patients with primary tumors in the upper lobes and with station 7 for the lower lobes. There was also a connection from the N1 lymph node stations to superior mediastinal lymph node stations in the lower lobes. In the right middle lobe, an even distribution from station 12m toward stations 2R, 4R, and 7 was noted. We released an interactive web application to visualize these data: http://www.canexapp.com.

Conclusions

Lymph node metastasis patterns differed according to the lobe bearing the tumor. Our results support the need for clinical trials to further investigate selective mediastinal lymph node dissection.

Evaluation of the necessity of Pulmonary Ligament Lymph Node Dissection for Upper Lobe Stage IB NSCLC: A Propensity Score-matched Study

Objective: The purpose of this study was to explore whether the resection of pulmonary ligament lymph nodes would affect the prognosis of patients with stage IB non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 341 patients with upper lobe stage IB NSCLC who underwent radical surgery for lung cancer at Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center from 1999 to 2009. The Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to analyze the prognostic factors. After propensity score matching (PSM), 204 cases were selected. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were applied to compare overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Results: Among the 341 cases included in the study, 217 had no pulmonary ligament lymph nodes resected, and 124 had pulmonary ligament lymph nodes resected. They were divided into two groups according to whether the pulmonary ligament lymph nodes were resected; there were significant differences between the two groups in laterality, resected lymph node stations, and resected lymph node numbers (P<0.05). Univariate and multivariate analyses by the Cox proportional hazards model showed that age and family history of malignant tumors were prognostic factors for OS, and no variables were prognostic factors for RFS (P<0.05). Resection of the pulmonary ligament lymph node was not associated with OS or RFS. After propensity score matching (PSM), survival analysis was performed again using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test; the results suggested that resection of the pulmonary ligament lymph node is not statistically associated with OS and RFS (P>0.05). Conclusions: For stage IB NSCLC, resection of the pulmonary ligament lymph nodes was not statistically associated with OS or RFS. Pulmonary ligament lymph node resection is not necessary for early-stage NSCLC.

LobE-Specific lymph node diSsectiON for clinical early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: protocol for a randomised controlled trial (the LESSON trial)

INTRODUCTION

Lung cancer was the most common malignancy and the leading cause of cancer-related death in China or worldwide, and surgery is still the preferred treatment for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The pattern of lymph node metastasis was found potentially lobe specific, and thus, lobe-specific lymph node dissection (L-SLND) was proposed to be an alternative to systematic lymph node dissection (SLND) for the treatment of early-stage NSCLC.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The LobE-Specific lymph node diSsectiON trial is a single-institutional, randomised, double-blind and parallel controlled trial to investigate the feasibility of L-SLND in clinically diagnosed stage IA1-2 NSCLC with ground-glass opacity components (≥50%). The intraoperative frozen section examination of surgical tissues confirms the histological type of NSCLC. We hypothesise that L-SLND (experimental group) is not inferior to SLND (control group) and intend to include 672 participants for the experimental group and 672 participants for the control group with a follow-up duration of 60 months. The primary outcomes are 5-year disease-free survival and 5-year overall survival. The secondary outcomes are metastatic lymph node ratio, postoperative complication incidence and mortality, duration of operation, duration of anaesthesia (min), the volume of bleeding (mL) and drainage volume. The intention-to-treat analysis would be performed in the trial.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This trial was approved by the ethics committee on biomedical research, West China Hospital of Sichuan University (2021-332). Informed consent would be obtained from all participants, and dissemination activities would include academic conference presentations and peer-reviewed publications.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

This trial was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2100048415.

Lobe-specific nodal dissection with intraoperative frozen section analysis for clinical stage-I non-small cell lung cancer: a validation study by propensity score matching

OBJECTIVE

Lobe-specific nodal dissection (LND) is increasingly used for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Japan; however, its treatment validity remains unclarified. Since 2013, LND has been used as a standard procedure for clinical stage-I (c-stage-I) NSCLC at our institution. We aimed to evaluate its validity using intraoperative frozen section analysis (FSA) for c-stage-I NSCLC.

METHODS

The participants comprised patients with NSCLC who underwent LND between 2013 and 2016 (n = 307) or systematic nodal dissection (SND) between 2002 and 2013 (n = 367) for c-stage-I disease. FSA was routinely performed in LND to examine at least three stations. Outcomes were compared between the LND and SND groups. Patients in whom LND was converted to SND due to metastasis on FSA of the sampled lymph node were still categorized into the LND group, i.e., intention-to-treat analysis. The prognostic impact was compared using propensity score matching.

RESULTS

The rate of conversion from LND to SND was 10.4%. Of the patients converted to SND, 12.5% had metastases outside the LND area. False-negative N2 results were detected in only 0.7% of the LND group patients after FSA. After matching, each group had 220 patients. There were no significant between-group differences in the lymph-node recurrence rate (7% vs. 6%), 5-year recurrence-free survival (80.1% vs. 79.0%), and overall survival (90.4% vs. 90.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

LND with intraoperative FSA is a valid modality that could serve as a standard surgical procedure for c-stage-I NSCLC. Intraoperative FSA may lower the residual lymph-node metastasis risk in LND.

Segmentectomy versus lobectomy in small-sized peripheral non-small-cell lung cancer (JCOG0802/WJOG4607L): a multicentre, open-label, phase 3, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial

BACKGROUND

Lobectomy is the standard of care for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The survival and clinical benefits of segmentectomy have not been investigated in a randomised trial setting. We aimed to investigate if segmentectomy was non-inferior to lobectomy in patients with small-sized peripheral NSCLC.

METHODS

We conducted this randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial at 70 institutions in Japan. Patients with clinical stage IA NSCLC (tumour diameter ≤2 cm; consolidation-to-tumour ratio >0·5) were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either lobectomy or segmentectomy. Randomisation was done via the minimisation method, with balancing for the institution, histological type, sex, age, and thin-section CT findings. Treatment allocation was not concealed from investigators and patients. The primary endpoint was overall survival for all randomly assigned patients. The secondary endpoints were postoperative respiratory function (6 months and 12 months), relapse-free survival, proportion of local relapse, adverse events, proportion of segmentectomy completion, duration of hospital stay, duration of chest tube placement, duration of surgery, amount of blood loss, and the number of automatic surgical staples used. Overall survival was analysed on an intention-to-treat basis with a non-inferiority margin of 1·54 for the upper limit of the 95% CI of the hazard ratio (HR) and estimated using a stratified Cox regression model. This study is registered with UMIN Clinical Trials Registry, UMIN000002317.

FINDINGS

Between Aug, 10, 2009, and Oct 21, 2014, 1106 patients (intention-to-treat population) were enrolled to receive lobectomy (n=554) or segmentectomy (n=552). Patient baseline clinicopathological factors were well balanced between the groups. In the segmentectomy group, 22 patients were switched to lobectomies and one patient received wide wedge resection. At a median follow-up of 7·3 years (range 0·0-10·9), the 5-year overall survival was 94·3% (92·1-96·0) for segmentectomy and 91·1% for lobectomy (95% CI 88·4-93·2); superiority and non-inferiority in overall survival were confirmed using a stratified Cox regression model (HR 0·663; 95% CI 0·474-0·927; one-sided p<0·0001 for non-inferiority; p=0·0082 for superiority). Improved overall survival was observed consistently across all predefined subgroups in the segmentectomy group. At 1 year follow-up, the significant difference in the reduction of median forced expiratory volume in 1 sec between the two groups was 3·5% (p<0·0001), which did not reach the predefined threshold for clinical significance of 10%. The 5-year relapse-free survival was 88·0% (95% CI 85·0-90·4) for segmentectomy and 87·9% (84·8-90·3) for lobectomy (HR 0·998; 95% CI 0·753-1·323; p=0·9889). The proportions of patients with local relapse were 10·5% for segmentectomy and 5·4% for lobectomy (p=0·0018). 52 (63%) of 83 patients and 27 (47%) of 58 patients died of other diseases after lobectomy and segmentectomy, respectively. No 30-day or 90-day mortality was observed. One or more postoperative complications of grade 2 or worse occurred at similar frequencies in both groups (142 [26%] patients who received lobectomy, 148 [27%] who received segmentectomy).

INTERPRETATION

To our knowledge, this study was the first phase 3 trial to show the benefits of segmentectomy versus lobectomy in overall survival of patients with small-peripheral NSCLC. The findings suggest that segmentectomy should be the standard surgical procedure for this population of patients.

FUNDING

National Cancer Center Research and the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare of Japan.

Selective Mediastinal Lymphadenectomy or Complete Mediastinal Lymphadenectomy for Clinical Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Selective mediastinal lymphadenectomy (SML) and complete mediastinal lymphadenectomy (CML) are two main types of surgery conducted for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) plus lobectomy or segmentectomy. It is not known whether stage I NSCLC can benefit from CML. Using the meta-analytical method, our research aimed to find out the worth of SML and CML for the therapy of clinical stage I NSCLC.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Ovid, MEDLINE, Cochrane Controlled Trial Register (CENTRAL), Embase, and Google Scholar for literature published up to June 2021 to evaluate the comparative research and to assess the post-operative complications, overall survival rate, disease-free survival rate, and local and distant recurrence. This meta-analysis was conducted by combining the results of the reported incidences of post-operative complications, local and distant recurrence, and short- and long-term mortality. The pooled odds ratios (OR) and the 95% confidence intervals were calculated by random or fixed effects models to compare the effectiveness between these two methods.

RESULTS

Five retrospective studies and one randomized controlled trial study were included in our research. The six studies included a total of 5713 patients, of whom 1480 were assigned to the SML group and 4233 were assigned to the CML group. No statistically significant differences were found in the 1- and 5-year overall survival rates or the 1-, 3-, and 5-year disease-free survival rates between the two groups. However, the 3-year overall survival favored the SML group (P < 0.05). There were also no statistically significant differences between the local and distant metastasis. Among the postoperative complications, pneumonia, atelectasis, and prolonged air leak were more common in the CML group (P < 0.05). There were no differences in the prevalence of dysrhythmia, chylothorax, acute respiratory distress syndrome, or recurrent laryngeal nerve injury between the two groups, which may be due to the limited sample size.

CONCLUSION

Considering the comparable survival rates, disease control, and fewer postoperative complications in the evaluated participants, SML is the preferred treatment with less invasiveness for clinical stage I NSCLC.

Inferior Pulmonary Ligament Division May Be Unnecessary during Left Upper Lobectomy: Effects on Lung Volume, Bronchial Angle and Bronchial Tortuosity

The benefits of dissecting inferior pulmonary ligament (IPL) during upper lobectomy using video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for early-stage lung cancer remains controversial. This study evaluates the effect of IPL dissection by comparing the lung volume, bronchial angle, and bronchial tortuosity of the left lower lobe (LLL) during VATS upper lobectomy. Medical records of all patients who underwent VATS left upper lobectomy for early-stage lung cancer were evaluated. Patients were divided into group P (preservation) and group D (dissection). Pre- and post-surgery lung volumes, bronchial angles (angle 1: axial angulation; angle 2: vertical angulation), and bronchial tortuosity (curvature index of the left main bronchus) were measured using computed tomography images for comparison. Forty patients were included in each group. Patient characteristics such as age, gender, body mass index, and smoking status, and preoperative lung volume, bronchial angles, and tortuosity were not significantly different between the two groups, and there was no statistically significant difference in the axial and vertical angulations; however, the change in pre- and postoperative bronchial tortuosity (0.03 ± 0.03 vs. 0.06 ± 0.03) and lung volume (-558.1 ± 410.0 mL vs. -736.3 ± 382.7 mL) showed a significant difference (p < 0.001 and p = 0.04, respectively). Preservation of IPLs during left upper lobectomy may be beneficial for LLL expansion and induces less movement and positional change in the left main bronchus.

Diversity of lymphatic flow in patients with lung cancer revealed by computed tomography lymphography

OBJECTIVES

This study was conducted to verify the optimal extent of lymph node dissection or sampling during lung cancer surgery based on the sentinel node (SN) map created by computed tomography (CT) lymphography.

METHODS

From April 2010 to January 2015, patients with clinical stage I non-small-cell lung cancer, who were candidates for lobectomy or segmentectomy with standard hilar and mediastinal lymph node dissection, and in whom bronchus reached the tumour, were enrolled. An ultrathin bronchoscope was inserted to the target bronchus under the guidance of virtual bronchoscopic navigation images. CT images of the chest were obtained 30 s after 2.5 ml of iopamidol was injected. SNs were identified when the maximum CT attenuation value of the lymph nodes on postcontrast CT images increased by 30 Hounsfield units or more compared with the precontrast images. Patients underwent lobectomy with standard lymph node dissection.

RESULTS

SNs were identified in 36 (87.8%) of the 41 patients. The average number of SNs was 1.6 (range, 1-4). There was 1 false negative case; therefore, the accuracy of SN identification was 97.2% (35/36). In 5 (13.9%) of 36 patients, SNs were outside the lobe-specific lymph node station range (#11i from right S1, #7 from right S1, #4R from right S8, #12u from right S8, #7 and #12l from left S1 + 2).

CONCLUSIONS

CT lymphography demonstrated the diversity of lymphatic spreading patterns and there were cases in which lymph flows are found outside the lymph node dissection range.

Systematic Versus Lobe-Specific Mediastinal Lymphadenectomy for Hypermetabolic Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

The optimal extent of lymph node dissection (LND) for hypermetabolic tumors that are associated with high rates of nodal disease, recurrence, or mortality has not been elucidated.

METHODS

We reviewed 375 patients who underwent lobectomy with lymphadenectomy for clinical T2-3 N0-1 M0 hypermetabolic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) ≥ 6.60] via a multicenter database. Extent of LND was classified into systematic mediastinal LND (systematic LND) and lobe-specific mediastinal LND (lobe-specific LND). Postoperative outcomes after lobectomy with systematic LND (n = 128) and lobe-specific LND (n = 247) were analyzed for all patients and their propensity-score-matched pairs.

RESULTS

Cancer-specific survival (CSS) and recurrence-free interval (RFI) of the systematic LND group were not significantly different from those of the lobe-specific LND group in the nonadjusted whole cohort. In the propensity-score-matched cohort (101 pairs), systematic LND dissected significantly more lymph nodes (20.0 versus 16.0 nodes, P = 0.0057) and detected lymph node metastasis more frequently (53.5% vs. 33.7%, P = 0.0069). Six (5.9%) patients in the systematic LND group had a metastatic N2 lymph node "in the systematic LND field" that lobe-specific LND could not dissect. The systematic LND group tended to have better prognosis than the lobe-specific LND group (5-year CSS rates, 82.6% versus 69.6%; 5-year RFI rates, 56.6% vs. 47.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Systematic LND was found to harvest more metastatic lymph nodes and provide better oncological outcome than lobe-specific LND in a cohort of hypermetabolic NSCLC patients.

Number of metastatic lymph nodes and zones as prognostic factors in non-small-cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

Characterizing pathological nodes (pNs) by location alone is sometimes inadequate as patients with pN1 or pN2 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) show prognostic heterogeneity. We aimed to assess the relationship of the number of metastatic lymph nodes (LNs) and zones with prognosis in NSCLC patients.

METHODS

We analysed 1393 patients who underwent lobectomy with mediastinal LN dissection for NSCLC at the Osaka International Cancer Institute between January 2006 and December 2015. Patients were classified into 3 groups according to the number of LNs: n1-3, n4-6 and n7-. We investigated the relationship of prognosis with the number of metastatic LNs and metastatic zones.

RESULTS

In the multivariable analyses, the number of metastatic LNs and zones were not independent factors for overall survival or recurrence-free survival in patients with pN1 disease after adjustment for age, sex, tumour histology and tumour diameter. However, n4-6 (ref. n1-3) was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival [hazard ratio (HR) 4.148, P < 0.001] in those with pN2 disease. There were no significant differences in overall survival and recurrence-free survival between pN1 (HR 0.674, P = 0.175) and pN2n1-3 disease (HR 1.056, P = 0.808). Moreover, patients with pN2 disease with a higher number of metastatic zones had a poor prognosis for recurrence-free survival [3 zones (ref. 1): HR 1.774, P = 0.051, and 4 zones (ref. 1): HR 2.173, P < 0.047].

CONCLUSIONS

The number of metastatic LNs and metastatic zones were useful prognostic factors in NSCLC patients. The findings could help in establishing a new pN classification.

Pathological features and prognostic implications of ground-glass opacity components on computed tomography for clinical stage I lung adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

To investigate the prognostic implications and pathological features of clinical stage I lung adenocarcinoma with ground-glass opacity (GGO) on computed tomography (CT).

METHODS

The subjects of this retrospective study were 1228 patients with lung adenocarcinoma classified as clinical stage I, who underwent complete resection by lobectomy. The patients were divided into four groups based on the presence and proportion of GGO according to the consolidation-to-tumor ratio (CTR); A, CTR ≤ 0.5; B, 0.5 < CTR ≤ 0.75; C, 0.75 < CTR ≤ 1.0 with GGO; D, without GGO (pure-solid). We compared overall survival, pathological findings (N/ly/v/STAS), and histological subtypes within each clinical stage among the four groups.

RESULTS

We found no significant differences among tumors with GGO (groups A, B and C) for prognosis or pathological findings in all the clinical stages. The prognoses of groups A, B and C were significantly better than that of group D for patients with clinical stages IA2-IB disease. Tumors without GGO on CT had a significantly larger number of positive N, ly, v and STAS in almost all stages than tumors with GGO on CT. Tumors without GGO on CT had significantly more solid predominant and less lepidic predominant adenocarcinoma.

CONCLUSION

Not the proportion of GGO, but its presence on CT, as well as the size of the solid component, were correlated significantly with pathological characteristics and survival.

Tumor-to-liver standard uptake ratio using fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography computed tomography effectively predict occult lymph node metastasis of non-small cell lung cancer patients

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to investigate predictive factors of occult lymph node metastasis and to explore the diagnostic value of various standardized uptake value (SUV) parameters using fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (F-FDG) positron emission tomography computed tomography (PET/CT) in predicting occult lymph node metastasis of clinical N0 non-small cell lung cancer patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed PET/computed tomography parameters of tumor and clinical data of 124 clinical N0 non-small cell lung cancer patients who underwent both preoperative F-FDG PET/computed tomography and anatomical pulmonary resection with systematic lymph node dissections. The SUVmax, SUVmean, metabolic total volume, and total lesion glycolysis of the primary tumor was automatically measured on the PET/computed tomography workstation. Standardized uptake ratio (SUR) were derived from tumor standardized uptake value divided by blood SUVmean (B-SUR) or liver SUVmean (L-SUR), respectively.

RESULTS

According to postoperative pathology, 19 (15%) were diagnosed as occult lymph node metastasis among 124 clinical N0 non-small cell lung cancer patients. On univariate analysis, carcinoembryonic antigen, cytokeratin 19 fragment, lobulation, and all PET parameters were associated with occult lymph node metastasis. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, and negative predictive value of L-SURmax were the highest among all PET parameters (0.778, 94.7%, and 98.4%, respectively). On multivariate analysis, carcinoembryonic antigen, cytokeratin 19 fragment, and L-SURmax were independent risk factors for predicting occult lymph node metastasis. Compared to L-SURmax alone and the combination of carcinoembryonic antigen and cytokeratin 19 fragment, the model consisting of three independent risk factors achieved a greater area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.901 vs. 0.778 vs. 0.780, P = 0.021 and 0.0141).

CONCLUSIONS

L-SURmax showed the most powerful predictive performance than the other PET parameters in predicting occult lymph node metastasis. The combination of three independent risk factors (carcinoembryonic antigen, cytokeratin 19 fragment, and L-SURmax) can effectively predict occult lymph node metastasis in clinical N0 non-small cell lung cancer patients.

New N1/N2 classification and lobe specific lymphatic drainage: Impact on survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with surgery

OBJECTIVE

to validate the proposed N descriptor revision on a large cohort of patients and assess the impact of tumour location on the distribution pattern of lymph node metastases for patients with NSCLC.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of a consecutive series of patients who had anatomical lung resections. Systematic lymph node dissection was done for all patients.

RESULTS

Between January 2009 and December 2019 2566 patients had surgical resection for NSCLC. 448 patients (17.5%) had histologically confirmed lymph node metastases: 257 (57.4 %) had pN1 and 191 pN2. Median age of the study population was 69.1 years. Overall survival (OS) for study population was 37.3 months with 5-year survival rate of 35.7 %. The survival analysis of the N subgroups showed the pN2 patients had a median OS of 27.9 months vs. 41.7 months for pN1 patients (p = 0.013). Analysis as per the new proposal of the N subgroups N1a vs N1b vs N2a1 vs N2a2 vs N2b showed that median survival OS was 41.7 vs. 39.2 mo vs. 33.3 mo vs. 28.9 mo vs. 24.6 mo (p = 0.099). There was statistically significant difference in survival between N2 patients with skip metastasis and N2 patients without skip metastases: OS 32.2 (95 % CI: 16.8-47.6) months vs. 24.2 months (p = 0.024). On multivariate analysis only pathological N (p = 0.011) and the new proposed N classification (p = 0.006) were independent prognostic factors for survival.

CONCLUSIONS

N1 and N2 disease are heterogeneous groups and require further stratification. The number of N2 lymph node stations involved and the presence or not of N1 disease translated to significant differences in survival and therefore have to be included in N staging.

Lobe-specific Lymph Node Dissection in Clinical Stage IA Solid-dominant Non-small-cell Lung Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Study

BACKGROUND

Lobectomy with systematic lymph node dissection (SND) remains the standard procedure for resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), whereas lobe-specific lymph node dissection (LSND) was reported to have more advantages in perioperative recovery and complication reduction in treating early-stage diseases. Survival outcomes after LSND remains controversial compared with SND.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 2014 to 2017, data of 546 patients with clinical stage IA solid-dominant NSCLC and who underwent curative lobectomies with LSND (n = 100) or SND (n = 446) at our institution were collected. Propensity score matching was conducted to eliminate the biases. Five-year disease-free survival and overall survival were compared between the groups. Perioperative parameters and postoperative complications were also analyzed.

RESULTS

Lobectomies with LSND or SND were performed in 100 patients and 446 patients, respectively. After matching, there were 100 patients in each group and no significant differences in 5-year overall survival (P = .473) and disease-free survival (P = .789) were found between the groups. Recurrence patterns were also similar (P = .733). Perioperative parameters were similar, whereas the incidence of postoperative complications in the SND group was found to be significantly higher than that in the LSND group (P = .003).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated that LSND has similar efficiency to SND in terms of survival, recurrence, lymph node dissection, and perioperative recovery of patients with clinical stage IA solid-dominant NSCLC, as well as significant advantages in reducing postoperative complications. Therefore, curative lobectomies with LSND may be more suitable and practical for clinical stage IA solid-dominant patients with NSCLC.

Impact of histological components on selecting limited lymphadenectomy for lung adenocarcinoma ≤ 2 cm

OBJECTIVES

There is still some dispute regarding the performance of limited mediastinal lymphadenectomy (LML) even for lung adenocarcinoma ≤ 2 cm. We aimed to recognize the potential candidates who can benefit from LML based on the percentage of histological components (PHC).

METHODS

We analyzed 1160 surgical patients with invasive lung adenocarcinoma ≤ 2 cm from seven institutions between January 2012 and December 2015. All histological subtypes were listed in 5% increments by pathological slices. To test the accuracy of frozen section in judging PHC, frozen section slides from 140 cases were reviewed by three pathologists.

RESULTS

There were 882 patients with systematic mediastinal lymphadenectomy (SML) and 278 with LML. Multivariable analysis indicated that, the total percentage of micropapillary and solid components (PHC_MIP+S) > 5 % was the independent predictor of N2 metastasis (P < 0.001). Overall, recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) favored SML compared with LML, but the subgroup analysis revealed LML and SML had similar prognosis in the group of PHC_MIP+S ≤ 5 %. Moreover, multivariable Cox analysis showed LML (vs. SML) was independently associated with worse prognosis for patients with PHC_MIP+S > 5 % (RFS, HR = 2.143, P < 0.001; OS, HR=1.963, P < 0.001), but not for those with PHC_MIP+S ≤ 5 % (RFS, P = 0.398; OS, P = 0.298). The sensitivity and specificity of frozen section to intraoperatively identify PHC_MIP+S ≤ 5 % were 97.6 % and 84.2 %, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

PHC_MIP+S showed the predictive value for N2 metastasis and procedure-specific outcome (LML vs. SML). It may serve as a feasible indicator for identifying proper candidates of LML by using intraoperative frozen section.

Comparison of Involved Field Radiotherapy versus Elective Nodal Irradiation in Stage IIIB/C Non-Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma Patients Treated with Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy: A Propensity Score Matching Study

Background

We retrospectively compared the incidence of isolated elective nodal failure (IENF) and toxicity rates and survival outcomes after elective nodal irradiation (ENI) versus involved-field RT (IFRT) by employing the propensity score matching (PSM) methodology in stage IIIB/C inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (C-CRT).

Methods

Our PSM examination included 1048 stage IIIB/C NSCLC patients treated with C-CRT from January 2007 to December 2016: a total dose of 66 Gy (2 Gy/fraction) radiotherapy and 1–3 cycles of platinum-based doublet chemotherapy concurrently. The primary and secondary endpoints were the IENF and toxicity rates and survival outcomes after ENI versus IFRT, respectively. Propensity scores were calculated for each group to adjust for confounding variables and facilitate well-balanced comparability by creating 1 : 1 matched study groups.

Results

The median follow-up was 26.4 months for the whole study accomplice. The PSM analysis unveiled 1 : 1 matched 646 patients for the ENI (N = 323) and IFRT (N = 323) cohorts. Intergroup comparisons discovered that the 5-year isolated ENF incidence rates (3.4% versus 4.3%; P=0.52) and median overall survival (25.2 versus 24.6 months; P=0.69), locoregional progression-free survival (15.3 versus 15.1 months; P=0.52), and progression-free survival (11.7 versus 11.2 months; P=0.57) durations were similar between the ENI and IFRT cohorts, separately. However, acute grade 3-4 leukopenia (P=0.0012), grade 3 nausea-vomiting (P=0.006), esophagitis (P=0.003), pneumonitis (P=0.002), late grade 3-4 esophageal toxicity (P=0.038), and the need for hospitalization (P < 0.001) were all significantly higher in the ENI than in the IFRT group, respectively.

Conclusion

Results of the present large-scale PSM cohort established the absence of meaningful IENF or survival differences between the IFRT and ENI cohorts and, consequently, counseled the IFRT as the elected RT technique for such patients since ENI increased the toxicity rates.

Nodal Involvement Pattern in Clinical Stage IA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer According to Tumor Location

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate lymph node involvement pattern in clinical stage IA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Clinical stage ⅠA NSCLC patients who underwent lobectomy and lymph node resection were included in this retrospective study. Mediastinal lymph node involvement was distinguished by different lobes and tumor size.

RESULTS

From 2000 to 2015, a total of 759 patients were identified: 282 (37.2%) with tumors in the right upper lobe (RUL), 183 (24.1%) in the left upper lobe (LUL), 124 (16.3%) in the right lower lobe (RLL), 103 (13.6%) in the left lower lobe (LLL), and 67 (8.8%) in the right middle lobe (RML). Patients with tumor size ≤1 cm accounted for 19.6%, >1 and ≤2 cm for 47.8%, >2 and ≤3 cm for 32.5%. Patients with pN1 accounted for 8.2%, and pN2 for 12.5%. Among patients with pN2, the inferior mediastinum was involved in 9.7% of RULs and 17.4% of LULs; the superior mediastinum was involved in 52.2% of RLLs and 36.4% of LLLs. Mediastinal lymph node metastasis was found in 13.2% of patients with size >1 and ≤2 cm, and 19.0% of >2 and ≤3 cm. Patients with tumors ≤1 cm had no N2 lymph node involved.

CONCLUSION

Selective lymph node dissection based on tumor location is not recommended in clinical stage ⅠA NSCLC, and systemic lymph node dissection should be performed for NSCLC with size >1 cm.

Lymph node assessment in early stage non-small cell lung cancer lymph node dissection or sampling?

Lymph node assessment is an essential component of the treatment of lung cancer. Identification of the correct "N" stage is important for staging which in turn determines treatment. Assessment of lymph nodes may be accomplished using imaging with CT scan and PET-CT, invasive techniques such as mediastinoscopy, endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) or endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA). Ultimately, regardless of any pre-resection assessment, lymph nodes must be assessed at the time of resection. The question to be addressed in this report is the role of mediastinal lymph node dissection versus lymph node sampling. However, the issues surrounding lymph node assessment in NSCLC are complex, depending on clinical stage, imaging and histology.

Is lobe specific lymph node dissection adequate for cN0-1 non-small cell lung cancer?

Purpose

This study aims to explore whether lobe specific lymph node dissection (LND) is adequate for cN0–1 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or not.

Methods

Among 5613 cN0–1 NSCLC patients, 394 cases (7.0%) with pN2 were enrolled and the distribution of mediastinal lymph node metastasis was analyzed. The included patients were divided into the non-lobe specific lymph node metastasis (NLSLNM) group and the lobe specific lymph node metastasis (LSLNM) group. The clinicopathological characteristics were compared between two groups and multivariable analysis was performed to find independent factors predicting NLSLNM.

Results

The incidence of pN2 cases deserved serious attention. The proportion of upper zone lymph node metastases was not rare in right (55.0%) and left (35.7%) lower lobe tumors. The proportion of subcarinal zone lymph node involvement was also high in right (21.8%) and left (25.8%) upper lobe tumors. Multivariable analysis showed that elevated carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level (P = 0.034), right lower lobe (RLL) tumors (P = 0.022) and station 11 involvement (P = 0.030) were independent risk factors for NLSLNM.

Conclusion

Systematic LND seems to be superior to lobe specific LND in the assessment of lymph node status and high CEA level, RLL tumors and station 11 involvement are predictors for NLSLNM.

Segment Location and Ground Glass Opacity Ratio Reliably Predict Node-Negative Status in Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Although selective mediastinal lymph node dissection based on lobe-specific nodal metastasis has been proposed for non-small cell lung cancer, controversy remains over its validity. We hypothesized that different segments within the same lobe might have different patterns of lymph node metastasis.

METHODS

Data on 2749 invasive non-small cell lung cancer patients who underwent pulmonary resection with systematic lymph node dissection from April 2008 to December 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. The segment location and consolidation tumor ratio were identified using preoperative computed tomography scans.

RESULTS

None of the 151 tumors with consolidation tumor ratio ≤ 0.5 had lymph node involvement. None of the 333 tumors located in apical segments had inferior mediastinal lymph node metastasis. When the analysis was limited to patients without hilar nodes involvement, only 7 out of 740 (0.9%) peripheral upper lobe tumors had inferior mediastinal lymph node metastasis. Interestingly, all these 7 tumors showed visceral pleural invasion. If hilar nodes were negative, superior mediastinal lymph node metastasis was not present for lower lobe ground glass opacity lesions. Among patients with left lower lobe tumors, if hilar nodes were negative, station 4L lymph node metastasis was not found in superior-segment or basal-segment tumors, and station 5/6 lymph node involvement was always absent in basal-segment tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

Segment location, ground glass opacity proportion, and absence of hilar lymph nodes involvement are reliable predictors of node-negative status in specific mediastinal regions. Based on these findings, we propose a new selective mediastinal lymph node dissection strategy for non-small cell lung cancer.

Selective lymph node dissection for clinical T1 stage non-small cell lung cancer

Background

More and more pulmonary nodules are detected by CT scan, and postoperative pathology reveals many lymph nodes without metastasis. The purpose of this study was to investigate the characteristics of T1 stage lymph node metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to explore the indications for selective lymph node dissection (SLND).

Methods

A total of 841 patients with stage T1 of NSCLC were performed lobectomy and systemic lymphadenectomy. We analyzed the types of lymph node metastases and the relationship between lymph node metastasis and pulmonary pleural invasion, thrombosis of vascular carcinoma and tumor size in all patients.

Results

Among them, 257 cases of tumor in the right upper lobe (RUL) and 186 cases in the left upper lobe (LUL), and no metastasis was found in the inferior mediastinal lymph nodes. Tumor metastases occurred in subcarinal lymph nodes, with hilar and/or mediastinal lymph node metastasis. Among the 171 cases with right lower lobe (RLL) tumors and the 151 cases with left lower lobe (LLL) tumors, patients with superior lymph node metastasis were all associated with hilar and/or subcarinal lymph node metastasis. Among the 76 cases with right middle lobe (RML) tumors, no metastasis with inferior mediastinal lymph node was observed. Lymph node metastasis is much easier in patients with pulmonary pleural invasion or thrombosis of vascular cancer. The larger the tumor diameter, the greater the possibility of lymph node metastasis.

Conclusions

SLND is a feasible treatment for clinical T1 stage NSCLC under the guidance of intraoperative frozen results of lobe-specific lymph nodes.

[The technique of thoracic lymph node dissection]

Systematic mediastinal, hilar and interlobar lymph node dissection is required in the S3 guidelines for the treatment of operable lung cancer. The lymph node involvement is considered one of the key prognostic factors. The type of lymph node resection is repeatedly the subject of controversially discussion. Lymph node dissection is essential for staging, prognosis, survival and recurrence rate. It should be standardized as a compartmental dissection with en bloc resection of lymph nodes including surrounding fat and connective tissue. Thus, exact knowledge of the anatomy of the thoracic organs with their peculiarities and high anatomical variability is necessary.

Impact of Different Types of Lymphadenectomy Combined With Different Extents of Tumor Resection on Survival Outcomes of Stage I Non-small-cell Lung Cancer: A Large-Cohort Real-World Study

Background: To investigate the prognostic impact of different types of lymphadenectomy with different extents of tumor resection on the outcomes of stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods: Patients were classified into lobectomy and sublobectomy groups, and then each group was subdivided according to the types of lymphadenectomy. The end points of the study were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Propensity score matched (PSM) comparative analysis and univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed.

Result: A total of 1,336 patients were included in the current study. Lobectomy was associated with better OS and DFS. In the lobectomy group, lobectomy with bilateral mediastinal lymphadenectomy (BML) was associated with better OS than lobectomy with systematic nodal dissection (SND) or lobe-specific systematic node dissection (L-SND). Lobectomy with SND or L-SND was associated with better OS than lobectomy with systematic nodal sampling (SNS) or selected lymph node biopsy (SLNB). Additionally, lobectomy with BML or SND was associated with better DFS than lobectomy with L-SND or SNS or SLNB. After PSM, compared with lobectomy with SNS or SLNB, lobectomy with SND resulted in more favorable OS and DFS. There was no survival difference between different types of lymphadenectomy for patients who underwent sublobectomy. A multivariable analysis revealed independent associations of lobectomy with BML or SND with better OS and DFS compared with those of lobectomy with SNS or SLNB.

Conclusion: This study reveals an association of lobectomy with more systematic and complete lymph node dissection, such as BML or SND, with better prognosis in stage I NSCLC patients.